Vendor Evaluation(2LIS_02_S013)

Hello Friends
i have issue with 2lis_02_s013 vendor evaluation . issue is when i do full upload for this data source i can retrive around 12000 records and when i try to do intial upload the system gives me error
LIS updating is still activated (client 200 )M+ 25
Errors in source system RSM 340
so i am unable to intial load so i did intial load without any datatransfer . it works fine . it has transfered only one record . but when i do the delta upload it does not extarct any data it shows 0/0 records but the staus is green . when i see the details tab Processing (data packet): No data .i have already activated delta in the lbw1 . there i find only two options one asynchronous and noupdating i have selected . asynchronus. here do i need to fill any setup sepatretely for delta . so how can we delete the setup tables for 'S'types data sources. is that same as lbwq. plz let me know what need to be done inorder to fill the cube with delta upload . look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
Thankyou

Kumar,
Fill up the setup tables for that extractor. Because the LO extraction only eorks on the the setup tables. And the setup tables are used when you do the delta.
Go to SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures ->
Initilization -> Delete the setup tables. Select your extractor and delete the setup tables for it..And...
SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures -> Initilization -> Filling setup tables. Fill the corresponding setup tables for vendor evaluation.
Try checking the data in RSA3.
Hope this helps.....

Similar Messages

Alternative for extractor 2LIS_02_S013 Vendor Evaluation InfoCube 0PUR_C02

Hi BW Gurus
Could some one advise me any alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 (Vendor Evaluation).
Vendor evaluation data is required for my customer.
At present 0PUR_C02 (Vendor evaluation) deactivated. due to miss match of fields S013, S013BIW1 and S013BIW2.
We are facing MIGO posting error update terminated. Now i had deactivated S013 at LBW0.
We already tried as per SAP note Note 115192 and 818652.
But thre is no use.
Look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
Thankyou

Hi,
There is no alternative alternative for 2LIS_02_S013 to upload the cube 0PUR_C02
But I hope, we can replace the cube 0PUR_C02 with 0PUR_C05 .0PUR_C05 gets the data by the data source 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e7/daba37d4c2503ee10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Vendor evaluation - Datasource?

Hi,
is 2LIS_02_ITM an alternative and a better Datasource over 2LIS_02_S013 for vendor evaluation when purchase order fields are included ?

Hi Akhilesh,
Thanks you for quick response.
As you said I decided to write user exit for MATNR, MATKL.against Vendor.
Let me know from which table Vendor I have to consider. and Vendor is also not available in MARA table.
How will I apporach to enhance MATNR, MATKL.
Let me know brief logic of coding..
Regards,
Sudhir

Vendor evaluation infosource

Hi all,
I have to evaluate scores for the vendors ,can anyone suggest which infosource should i have to use and what type of extraction(LIS or LO) i had to go with.
Like wise for customer(2LIS_01_S001) shall i have to go with 2LIS_02_S013 and follow the conventional method(LIS) or is there any other way.
Thanks & regards
Lisa

Hi Lisa,
besides LIS datasource 2LIS_02_S013 (which feeds 0PUR_C02 infocube and works as the other 'old' LIS datasources), you can also choose from 0MM_PUR_VE_01 and 0MM_PUR_VE_02 datasources.
The first one (feeding 0PUR_C05 infocube) describes vendor evaluation overall data and the second one (feeding 0PUR_C06 infocube) displays the scores for semiautomatic subcriteria at info record level, in order to compare your vendors at material level.
The only prerequisite to use these datasource is their activation (RSA5).
Remember only that the characteristic Cancel (Reverse) (0REVERSEDOC) is currently not supplied with data from the OLTP system for the datasource 2LIS_02_S013 and, for the others datasources, only changed data is transferred; so, you have to carry out a new evaluation of your vendors before transferring the data from R/3 to BW.
Hope it helps (and don't forget to assign some points by clickin'on the yellow star to the contributors that help you !!!)
Bye,
Roberto

Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

Hello all,
Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
(ME61/ME62/ME63)
Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Joy Ghosh

The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

Vendor Evaluation

Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at material level for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance at material level .
Example :
Materials A and B were purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
The on time delivery for Material A as 100 % ( if he did good performance )
The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance ) ,they donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
Any Thoughts on that?

Hi Tafanzas,
The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
BR
Raf

Vendor Evaluation Report

Hi All,
We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VT

hi
for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM

Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

Hi everyone,
Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
any other Program names will also do...
Thanks
Sukriti...

hi
S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
ME65 - Evaluation Lists
regards
kunal

Custom report for vendor evaluation

Hai All,
My client requires custom report to show the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format for the purpose of TPM audit.
Regards
R.Senthilnambi

Hi Senthil,
u can download the documents from sap help to show the logic to ur audit, how sap will calculate the scores.
If they insist for certain data with logic, u can develop a z-report and show them for 10 or 20 materials.
hope this resolves ur problem

Goods receipt sub critaria in vendor evaluation

In vendor evaluation there is one sub-critaria goods receipt under main critaria quality, in this how system calcutae the tax.
i went through the sap help doc, in this it is mentiaoned that
"When you run an automatic re-evaluation for a vendor, the system selects all the incoming inspection lots for the vendor that lie within the validity period and calculates the average of the scores. The result is the vendor's score for the quality of goods received."
i m not understand with this. plz specify in your words and where we maintain the validity period?

Hi,
In the sub-criteria Goods Receipt, system dows not calculate tax. In the main criteria of Quality, if your material is maintained for quality inspection type 01, then system creates inspection lots for GRN. The score of each inspection lot is calculated based on you settings (For example based on usage decision). The system then saves these scores of each inspection lot. These scores are then averaged out for all the inspection lots those lie within the validity periods.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Prashant

Performance in Vendor Evaluation (ME61)

Hi, I configured a new subcriteria (Complaints) in the Quality criteria, and after my job of Vendor Evaluation decreased the performance.
Is there any procedure to increase the performance?
Regards,
Anna Pinheiro

Dear Sachin,
You can go to SPROMM-Purchasing-Vendor evaluationMaintain P.Organization data .
Then select the P.Org , then go to point score for automatic criteria.
You also can maintain the smoothing factor , min delv.var,etc, Just double click(go to detail) when you select the p.org.
The percentage score is define as per business req.
Regards,
w1n

Vendor evaluation report to be run for previous period

Hi,
Is the possible to run the Vendor evaluation report for back date.
i.e. if the period of evaluation is 30 days, can we run the report for previous periods
Regds,
Ritesh

Depending on the library you are using, can you verify whether you can use one of the following variables?
1PERIK
1PERW
5ACPERI
6-PERIK
8WPERIO
All these variables use fiscal periods and not calendar periods, that way you don't have to bother about number of weeks in a period, unless you really need to do the calculation based on number of days in a period.
If your library does not support these variables, then pl copy one of these variables (GS11) with appropriate details into a custom variable and use it in your report.
Let me know.
Regards
Subodh

Vendor evaluation report for a definite time period

Hi Experts,
Vendor Evaluation Summary Report required for the vendors for a definite time period. Output of the report should show the scores of vendors for criteria like Price, Delivery, Quality, Service and summation of all these scores.
Please let me know if any standard report is available which can fulfill my requirement.
Thanks in advance.
Kishore.

Hi,
ME6H report is not fulfilling my requirement since i require the output format in the form like vendor, vendor name, plant, price, delivery, service, quality and the summation of scores given to these criterias.
Thanks
Kishore.

Vendor Evaluation - Query

Dear all.
I need to create a query for the Process vendor Evaluation, that display the Notes of one Vendor. Is there a logical database to access this Info.
At the moment i created an infoset link to table ELBK, and created some Adicional Fields but when i'm generating the Infoset System Returns the Following Message "Do all fields used have a name? (use help)".
Best Regards
Thanks in Advanced
PMR

Could you explain what you mean in your reply.
Thanks in advance
Roger

Tables for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    I want to know the tables in which vendor evaluation data is being stored, and I need to get vendor evaluation data through my RFC, can u suggest me the procedure how I need to do it.
                             Thank you
                              Regards
                                Srinivas

Dear,
You ask a whole Vendor evaluation concept you need to read the help and do customizing depend on the requirement, then you evaluate the vendor using ME61 or ME6G.Almost all of your question need customizing setup first
below is the guide book :
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Vendor Evaluation(2LIS_02_S013)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for