Vendor Evaluation Automatic calculation
Dear Experts ,
How can I calculate delivery and quality main criteria Automatically in Vendor evaluation.
Thanks & Regards
Hi,
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
- You should have some transactions done in the system.
To maintain the IMG settings :
SPRO>Material Management > Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>
1. Define Weighting Keys (Need to define factors like Equal & Unequal )
2. Define Criteria (Need to define Criteria - Price, Quality, Delivery)
3.Define Scope of List & (Ranking)
4.Maintain Purchase Org (Maintain Values in Pur Org with Factors and their scores)
(If you have already maintained the above settings you would simply need to use Tcode ME63)
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
(You should have some transactions done in the system )
Hope this helps,
Amit Bakshi
Similar Messages
-
Vendor Evaluation Automatically
Dear all
Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi -
Vendor evaluation score calculations.
Hi Guys,
I urgently need your assitance here.
May someone explain to me how the how the system calculates the scores for the automatic criteria "Quality" and "Service"
I understand the score calculation for criteria "Delivery" - the system looks at the delivery date on the PO v/s the GR date as well as the quantity on the PO v/s quantity on at GR.
please assist.
thaksu2022Quality - Scoring method 7
- Calculated with the information of the quality notification.
- Each time a GR is posted for quality inspection a score should be introduced manually for this audit lot.
- First system computes a score for the lots that were inspected.
- If there is a GR without inspection it will receive the maximum score.
- Then system compares the number of GR for the period (table S012 field ALIEF) against the information from the quality notification.
Automatic EvaluationShop floor Complaint
u2022Shop Floor Complaint - Scoring method 8
- From the on-line documentation:"During the vendor evaluation process, the system checks whether the costs associated with the faulty delivery exceed the maximum percentage of business volume defined in the Customizing system."
- The "cost associated" are based on the information from Quality Notification (transaction QM03). This information is saved on table QMEL.
- The "business volume" is determined by the invoice value for the period defined on the purchasing org. vendor evaluation customizing: T147-STAGE.
- The sums of invoice's values are taken from table S012 for the period.
- Check if the USER-EXIT is not active.
- Check if there are invoices for the period.
Automatic EvaluationQuality Audit
u2022Quality Audit - Scoring method 9
- Based on the information of Quality Management.
- The scores for an Audit lot are introduced in the Quality Management system.
- When an evaluation is carried out system check the parameter Quality audit in customizing.
- If the indicator is set, the system calculates the average score for all the quality audits in the validity period.
- The result is the vendor's score for the quality audit.
- If the indicator is not set, only the most recent audit lot is included. This then represents the vendor's score for the sub-criteria
- Check if the USER-EXIT is active.
For services
u2022 The scores for semiautomatic criteria come from informastion entered in the service entry sheet (for an externally performed service).
u2022
When you define a scoring method "C" - Determination from quality ratingor "D" - Determination from timeliness rating of service then you can enter a manually score in the Entry Sheet under Vendor Evaluation -
Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation
Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
PratapHello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards, -
Vendor evaluation - Automatic scoring method
Dear All,
With auto evaluation of vendors, I get some vendors without having any score in some main criteria i.e. Price, Quality and Delivery. What may be the reasons? How we can cross check system alloted scores?
Regards
Manojvendor evaluation to work in your system you need to have it integrated with other modules like QM etc. so as to get the data updated in form of scores and soem of the scores are accessed by the system from info record
-
Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage
Dear Experts,
I have mention below % and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
- 100 On-time del.
1,0 90 On-time del.
2,0 95 On-time del.
10,0 80 On-time del.
20,0 60 On-time del.
30,0 40 On-time del.
40,0 20 On-time del.
50, 5 On-time del.
99,9 1 On-time del.
-5,0 95 On-time del.
-10,0 65 On-time del.
-20,0 75 On-time del.
-30,0 60 On-time del.
-40,0 40 On-time del.
-50,0 20 On-time del.
-60,0 5 On-time del.
-99,9 1 On-time del.
Thanks,Hi Shyam,
I am also looking for the same.
can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic, Fully Automatic Evaluation. what is the difference.
what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
Regards,
Anthyodaya. -
Dear friends !
I have a doubt about Vendor Evaluation criteria calculation.
For example , Price
Into Price(main criteria) we have Price Level and Price history.
SAP calculate scores to price using which tables ? this criteria is accumulated by month ? or by Purchase order ?
Does anyone could help to understand the places where SAP catch data to calculate vendor scores ?I really do not understood the help.sap.com regarding this subject.
Best regards,
AleHi Alessandro Brazil
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
Thanks -
Vendor Evaluation Smoothing Factor an average
Hi,
We are setting up Vendor Evaluation and would like the Delivery scores to be closer to a true average of all of the scores. We are having difficulty getting to that number. Is there a way to do it in SAP?
Thanks.
BeverlyHi Beverly
Have a look at the following notes
459516 FAQ: Vendor evaluation
806834 Calculation of score for Quantity Reliability
and also the following documentation
Determining Scores - MM Vendor Evaluation - SAP Library -
Vendor Evaluation using Material Group
Dear all
Kindly let me know whether Vendor evalation is possible using material Group.
Regards
M.Chandra mohanDear all
What I mean to say it, we do not have follwoing master in our company.
Material master, Vendor master & Pur.Info records,I did not know what configuration has been there in PRD server,But once we gave Authorization to our user regarding Vendor Report, they are getting the Vendor evaluated automatically,So I thought It is taking the material Group as a reference for Evaluation,That why i requesting your guy how we can do configuration in related to Vendor Evaluation.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan -
Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation
Hello All,
Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
1) Effective Price
2) Calculated Effective Price
3) Actual Effective Price
4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
I see all this in the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Under "How the System computes Scores:"
Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
ThanksHi ZEYNEP,
1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.) into account.
2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
3) Total value = total quantity x price
When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
Here is an example
Material Price is $ 1000/-
& Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
Here Net Price $ 900/-
Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
Freight $ 50/-
$ 1040/-
The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
Thanks -
Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)
Hi Experts,
We have defined vendor evaluation in such a way. Price, Quality & Delivery - Automatic Evaluation and Service - Manually Entered. When we do Automatic evaluation thru T-Code ME61, Score of price, quality and delivery appears in the system. How can we see the backend data from which these scores derives. So that we can explain user, that the scores have come due to following data / calculation done by system in background.
Can anybody help me. Full points to helping answers.
Regards
GRHi GR,
In Help documentation you have the details how each score is getting calculated. We can use this documentation to explain to the client. Also you can take the help of OSS notes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Regarding to know how the system arrived at that score, is very difficult as it calculates the score by taking all the trasactions happend for that period. And no where in the system it shows how it calculated per transaction-wise.
But if you are so determined, note down the previous score for the vendor, then do one transaction ( PO and GR). Manually Claculate the for one perticular criteria score as defined in the Help documentation. Then run the evaluation and cross check your manually calculated score to the new score.
Hope this helps you in answering your query,
With Regards,
Krishna -
Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria
Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathyhi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish -
Vendor evaluation: Calculation of subcriteria.
Hi Gurús,
I would like to know, how subcriterias of criteria delivery is calculate it by the system
Thanks in advance
Regards
EnzoThe subcriteria of delivery is calculated based on the Info structure data.
it is automatically done by the system.
when you do the GR of the PO system update the info sturcture based on the deli date on the PO and GR receipt date
same way it is calculating the qunatity and updates the info structure and when you run the vendor evaluation it is fatching the data from this sturcture
that's the reason, point of this criteria you should keep automatic which is defined by the system. -
Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation
Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
Thanks and regards
sriramhi sriram
vendor evaluation can be done
main criteria score from sub criteria
sub criteria
each sub criteria scores will be cal based
1.maual
2.semi auto
3.automatic
if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
ok
can u understand that
if ok assign points me
nani -
Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date
Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
CharudattaHi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I uninstall 11.4 and return to an earlier version?
iTunes 11.4 (OS 10.6.8) is highly dysfunctional on my system. Highly unresponsive, Activity Monitor shows it's not responding, have to force quit many times, lots of SPODs, etc. etc. etc. How do I back out of this version and return to an earlier one
-
Files not created with iTunes do not play from remote iTunes library
I hve ripped a large part of my CD collection into music files into FLAC format. I have since converted my music files from FLAC into Apple Lossless Audio Codec (ALAC) format and imprted them into iTunes. The files play with no problem on iTunes if t
-
Hi, I'm new to this forum and fairly new to Java. I'm trying to run RMI from an applet, it works fine on the LAN but has problems externally due to firewalls. I'm now trying to set up RMI over HTTP to negate this problem but cannot find the Java-RMI.
-
Hi, I'm new here, people...and definitely new to iDVD. Hoping for some guidance. This seems like a good place to look for it. Just made a nice 2 minute iMovie (3.0.3), using lots of stills, transitions, and video. 646 MB. Soundtrack's key and very ni
-
Resource Allocation for IEEE 1394 (Firewire) Cameras in Triggered Mode
In this article: Resource Allocation for IEEE 1394 (Firewire) Cameras in Triggered Mode http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/ED092614FCCC900D86256D8D004A3B0C it says "The Bytes Per Packet value represents the number of bytes that are transmitted a