Vendor evaluation - Automatic scoring method

Dear All,
With auto evaluation of vendors, I get some vendors without having any score in some main criteria i.e. Price, Quality and Delivery. What may be the reasons? How we can cross check system alloted scores?
Regards
Manoj

vendor evaluation to work in your system you need to have it integrated with other modules like QM etc. so as to get the data updated in form of scores and soem of the scores are accessed by the system from info record

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation Automatic calculation

Dear Experts ,
How can I calculate delivery and quality main criteria Automatically in Vendor evaluation.
Thanks & Regards

Hi,
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
- You should have some transactions done in the system.
To maintain the IMG settings :
SPRO>Material Management > Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>
1. Define Weighting Keys (Need to define factors like Equal & Unequal )
2. Define Criteria (Need to define Criteria - Price, Quality, Delivery)
3.Define Scope of List & (Ranking)
4.Maintain Purchase Org (Maintain Values in Pur Org with Factors and their scores)
(If you have already maintained the above settings you would simply need to use Tcode ME63)
Use T Code ME63 to get output by the system. Select Weighting Key and click on all logs to get the report.
(You should have some transactions done in the system )
Hope this helps,
Amit Bakshi

Vendor Evaluation using Material Group

Dear all
Kindly let me know whether Vendor evalation is possible using material Group.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Dear all
What I mean to say it, we do not have follwoing master in our company.
Material master, Vendor master & Pur.Info records,I did not know what configuration has been there in PRD server,But once we gave Authorization to our user regarding Vendor Report, they are getting the Vendor evaluated automatically,So I thought It is taking the material Group as a reference for Evaluation,That why i requesting your guy how we can do configuration in related to Vendor Evaluation.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Vendor Evaluation Scoring methods E & F

Dear Folks,
In the vendor evaluation, I see two scoring methods:
E Determination of Price Variance from Invoice Documents
F Determination of Quantity Variance from Invoice Documents
Can anyone advice me how these two scoring methods works?
For example, the method E, price variance from invoice documents. What does it means? It's the price variance from invoice documents against what? Is it against the PO price?
And for method F, what's the quantity variance compared against? GR quantity or PO quantity?
Best Regards
Junwen

Hi,
In case of scoring method E, the price variance in invoice is with reference to the price mentioned in PO. In customization, you maintain the score for each percentage or a range of percentage variance. System calculates variance from price entered in Invoice with reference to the PO & then assigns the score from the values entered in Customization.
In case of scoring menthod F, Quantity Variance is with reference to the quantity in GRN. In this case you enter the score in customization for the variance. System calculates the variance from the quantity entered in Invoice & the GRN quantity & assigns the score you maintained in Customization.
Hope this is clear.
Regards,
Prashant

Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathy

hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish

Automatic Vendor Evaluation - Compliance with Shipping Instructions

Hi Gurus,
Can anybody help me for "Compliance with Shipping Instructions".
I have maintained the shipping instructions but i need to know where the receiving person needs to enter score for Vendor's compliance for shipping instructions before posting the GR inorder to do Vendor Evaluation.
Thanks

hi
u find out what is main criteria
if Sub criteria is Compliance with shipping instr
u need to find out which scoring method ur foloowing
if it is automatic u need to maintain points score for sub criteria then system automatically will do.
for that u need maintain Compliance with shipping at the time of GR
in WHERE tab page in item .
ok
nani

Automatic criteria in Vendor evaluation

Can anybody tell me what is difference between automatic criteria and semi automatic creteria in vendor evaluation? can anyone explain me automatic criteria with some example?
Thanks and regards
sriram

hi sriram
vendor evaluation can be done
main criteria score from sub criteria
     sub criteria
           each sub criteria scores will be cal based
                1.maual
                2.semi auto
                3.automatic
if auto means u need to define points score for each sub criteria.once u define criteria for scoring based on that system automatically allot score for each sub criteria
if semi auto means u need to enter score manually at inforecord level for each subcriteria for each operation u do in purchasing.Here u r not defigning criteria for alloting score to sub criteria u need to enter manually for each operation.
ok
can u understand that
if ok assign points me
nani

Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

Dear Team,
Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
Thanks & Regards
Nireesh

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

Hello All,
Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
1) Effective Price
2) Calculated Effective Price
3) Actual Effective Price
4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
I see all this in the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Under "How the System computes Scores:"
Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
Thanks

Hi ZEYNEP,
1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.) into account.
2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
3) Total value = total quantity x price
When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
Here is an example
Material Price is $ 1000/-
& Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
Here Net Price $ 900/-
Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
Freight $ 50/-
$ 1040/-
The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
Thanks

Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

Dear Experts,
I have mention below % and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
-          100     On-time del.
1,0       90     On-time del.
2,0         95     On-time del.
10,0         80     On-time del.
20,0         60     On-time del.
30,0         40     On-time del.
40,0         20     On-time del.
50,         5     On-time del.
99,9           1     On-time del.
-5,0            95     On-time del.
-10,0     65     On-time del.
-20,0     75     On-time del.
-30,0     60     On-time del.
-40,0     40     On-time del.
-50,0     20     On-time del.
-60,0     5     On-time del.
-99,9     1     On-time del.
Thanks,

Hi Shyam,
I am also looking for the same.
can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic, Fully Automatic Evaluation. what is the difference.
what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
Regards,
Anthyodaya.

Vendor Evaluation semi-automatic TABLE ELBM

Hi,
i am BW consulting,
i want use the 0PUR_C06 cube but this use the extractor 0MM_PUR_VE_02 in R3, this extractor read information the ELBM table.
When run de vendor evaluation, fill de ELBP (customer level)table but not ELBM (material level) table.
someone knows how to fill the table?
or the procedure for vendor evaluation semi-automatic at the level of material?
Thanks!

Hi,
The table ELBM is filled in the info record. If you go to transaction ME12 and then to Extras/Vendor Evaluation, there you have a field Market behavior. This is the way this table is filled.
I hope this helps!.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

AUTOMATIC VENDOR EVALUATION

Dear SDN Experts & MM Gurus,
I had run automatic vendor evaluation in back groung . I need your experities in the following queries .
1. system is giving messsage weighing Key doesnot exists for the purchase organization & in overall score in Me62 or Me63 transaction showing Zero for all vendors .what is the difference between Me63 & me62 display.
2. After running the report for all vendors i want to view the comparision list or Rank for all vendors .
3. i would like to view the report by vendor code main crtieria scores & overall score ,but system is not showing report in this format ,is there any report where i can get the automatic vendor evaluated list in this form.
Thanks in Advance .
regards,
Injeti.

please advice /comment on the above query .
regds,
injeti

Vendor evaluation - Automatic scoring method

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for