Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

Dear Folks,
Customer requirement is to see subcriterion level scores of Vendor
Evaluation according to material, Material group wise. But the
datasource provided by SAP is providing the data according to
Purchasing Organisation level and Vendor level (0MM_PUR_VE_01).Is it
Possible to break the scores according to material group and material
as TC in r/3: ME6B provides ranking based on Main Criterion level
scores. If possible, what is the logic?
Thanks in Advance

Hi Anil,
Thanks for ur reply.
But Customer requires vendor evaluation data through Automatic route.
0MM_PUR_VE_02 caters to semi-automatic data which needs to be configured in r/3, and customer doesn't want to do that. Is there any other solution.

Similar Messages

Vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group

Hi experts!
Thank you for pay attention to my message! I have a question about the fields in customer master date.
What does it mean or what will happen to the customer master if I entry a vendor no. or a company ID for trading partner in the field vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group in the customer master general data?
In other words, in which business scenario or situation should I entry data in these fields:
vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group in the customer master general data?
Thank you for your help!
TangDark.

Hi,
Vendor- when the customer is also a vendor( i.e. supplying any form of product- raw material) you need to enter vendor no.
Trading partner- If this customer is trading with other company code of the same client.
Authorization- To protect access of the data maintained
Corporate group- If customer belongs to a group ,maintain group key here.
Thanks,
Vrajesh

How to get classification for a given material and material type in MM

Hello Friends,
One of my developer colleagues is struggling to find out : how to get classification for a given material and material type in MM?
He is looking for probable table and table fields to Select from.
I would appreciate seriously any help in this regard.
~Yours Sincerely

Hi
Below given the flow and table details for a given class and class type.
- Table KLAH --> This contains the "Internal class no" [ for the given Class & Class type ]
- Table KSML --> This contains the " internal character numbers " [ nothing but characteristics attached to the class ] , which can be fetched with the above fetched internal class no
- Table AUSP --> This table contains the objects ( material ) attached to the internal characters of that class
- Table CABNT --> This table contains the "Description" for the internal character numbers.
- award points if this is ok

Vendor Evaluation - Price level and Price Behavior

Dear All,
In Vendor Evaluation - What's the Difference between Price level and Price Behavior.
On what basis these two will be calculated.
Thanks

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Vendor evaluation - General Service and support

Hi
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
How the scores are calculated for this?\
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Regards
Soumen

Hi,
Following are the answers for your questions.
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
Ans: - Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
How the scores are calculated for this?
Ans: - For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Ans: - And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it duirng ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Report to transport vendors for a plant and material type

Hi Guys ..
Is there any report fwhere is can download all the vendors for a particular Plant and type of material.
Thanks for your support

Hello Vivek,
I have checked these tables but my issue is to get the list of Material numbers in the table along with a field for Class type.
So this does not happen in these tables.
However thank you for the tables given
Regards
Mahesh

Link between material and material groups

hi all,
I have reploicated material groups and materials in SRM.How do i link these naterial group and materials?

Deepa,
When you replicate material from ECC, data from multiple tables in backend is extracted and sent to SRM in BDOC. One of the tables is MARA and it has material group information.
Check COMMPR01 transaction in SRM and pull up a material you replicated. It should show there the material group.
SG

Config: planning material and material blocking

Hi all,
Is there a config that can be done to prevent the locking of material when sales personnel are entering orders in the system.
Example:
sales person in entering order for material m1 thats in planning material p1
planning material p1 includes material m1,m2,m3.
all material m1 m2 m3 are locked because they bellong to planning material p1.
In SM12 the only blocking element is on planning material p1.
if a shipping is done during this time using LT03 we get material m3 blocked.
Regards!
Curtis
Edited by: Curtis Marchand on Feb 19, 2009 1:58 PM

Hi,
I have tried this and all this does is not allow the material m1 with planning material p1 to be added in a sales order.
What I want is for material m1 to be added in sales order and at the same time to be able to not block the material m1 for shipping in LT03 or vl02n.
If there's a lock on the planning material p1 that is associated to the material m1 also this will block all material that has planning material m1 associated to it.
I tried several combinations in ovsu and nothing seems to work the way I want it to.
Maybe this is not possible?
Regards!
Curtis

Vendor Report G/L and open item wise

hello all,
I need to execute a vendor (for bulk vendor) report with following data/field, please suggest.
Vendor Code Vendor Name G/L code G/L description Balance Open items
I tryed with FBL1N, FBL3N but I want a report in a simplest format.

HI,
Try this,
S_ALR_87012301: GL Account Balances (Totals & Balances )
S_ALR_87012282 GL Line Items
S_ALR_87012082: Vendor Balances
You have standard tcode for vendor line item display S_ALR_87012103 - List of Vendor Line Items
Regards
KK
Edited by: Kishore Kumar Galla on Mar 18, 2010 2:52 PM

Vendor evaluation at material level

Hi friends,
I have one requirement from client. A vendor supplies many materials. My client want to get report of vendor rating of the vendor for each material and material groupwise.
Can this objective can be achieved?
Please suggest.
Regards

Hi,
When you run Vendor Evaluation (for all criteria), sysytem keeps log of all material level points the Vendor has achieved. You can view the same in transaction ME64.
Regards,
Prashant

Material and representative material in PCA

Hello all,
I have an issue concerning material numbers in Profit Center Accounting. My aim is to be able to report on material group (attribute on 0MATERIAL) in BW for both plan and actuals.
In R/3 PCA they plan on field "representative material". Furthermore they post actuals on "material" field.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_1 brings all postings (plan + actuals) to BW, but does not include the "material" field. It only includes the "representative material" field, so I'm missing the possiblity to see the actuals per material number.
Extractor 0EC_PCA_3 brings all actual postings to BW and includes the "material number". However the representative field is not filled (since this is only actuals)
So I get what I need into BW, but in two different extractors (and also on two different aggregation levels).
I somehow need to merge the information of these two extractors. Is it a multi cube I should use here? Or should I rather try to modify 0EC_PCA_1 by adding the material number in an append structure? I actually tried this, but I still couldn't find the new field in the extractor. So I guess this is not possible here and that I have to go for the multi cube solution?
I need to get both the "representative material" and the "material" into info object "0MATERIAL" since the material group is an attribute of that. Could this work if I modify the update rules in cube 0PCA_C01 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_1) so that repr. material points at 0MATERIAL (for plan values) and at the same time use cube 0PCA_C03 (this is filled with records from 0EC_PCA_3) which uses 0MATERIAL as standard (for the actuals).
I'd be extremely thankful for some ideas/help...
Thanks in advance!
best regards,
Fredrik

Hi Fredrik,
Some questions:
Is there a 1 on 1 relation between repr. mat. and material?
Do you have PCA_1 as Totals or Line Items?
If you want to report on material group you somewhere have to have a relation between repr. material and mat. group.
Of course you can always map the rep. into 0MATERIAL, but you MD has to be correct too.
And: Adding in PCA extractors is difficult!

Authorization for material type and material views

Hello all,
I would need to restrict a user group, in creation (MM01) and modification of material master, based of type material and material views.
The authorization, for each user should be:
- view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER;
- view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF.
I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects:
1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B)
2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
but the effect is to be authorized, to all view for material type ZFER and ZOFF.
I have already updated the authorization group of the type materials (OMS2).
Is there a solution for this problem?
(component version SAP ECC 6.0)
Thanks.
Regards,
Luca

I tried to create 2 roles in PFCG with the following authorization objects: 1) M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) 2) ) M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = B
- Are both these roles assigned to the same user? then your purpose is not solved, It is more or less like giving full authorization.
- One role should be
M_MATE_MAR (Material Master: Material Types) ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZFER and M_MATE_STA (Maintenance Statuses) ACTVT = *, STATM = A,C, D, E, F, G,K, L, P, Q, S, V, X, Z (excluding B) for view, modify and create of all views, except accounting (B) for type material ZFER. This should be assigned to one user
- Second role should be
M_MATE_MAR ACTVT = *, BEGRU = ZOFF and M_MATE_STA ACTVT = *, STATM = * for view, modify and create of all views for type material ZOFF. This role should be assigned to the second user.
Regards,
Subbu

Vendor Ageing Report Business Area and Profit Center wise

Dear Experts,
I have a requirement where user wants a Report for Vendor Ageing Business Area and Profit Center wise.I checked Standard T Codes but the same were Business Area wise but i could'nt find Profit Center wise Report.If their is any standard functionality then please advice.
We are using SAP ECC 6.0 Classic GL with Spl Purpose Ledger active.Can someone please advice can i derive such a report through Report Painter.If possible please advice in details.
Your Valuable inputs shall be appreciated....
Regards
Rahul

Hi Durga,
Can you please elaborate further on the same how you are determining the Report in FBL1N.What are the prerequisited to be taken care of and some further details on the same.
My Bus Area is not as same as Profit Center eg
BA          PC
FXRT     RT0001 / 2 / 3
TMMG   TM0001/ 2 / 3
LTOB     LO0001/ 2 / 3
I checked in my system but we do not have the Program for the following T Codes
S_PCO_36000218 - Segment Receivables
S_PCO_36000219 - Segment Payables
S_AC0_52000887 - Profit Center Receivables
S_AC0_52000888 - Profit Center Payables
Regards
Rahul

Vendor evaluation and audit management

Hi,
do you know if there is a link between the 'vendor evaluation' procedure (ME61) and the 'Audit management' (PLMD_AUDIT)?
If yes, where I can setup this link?
Thanks
xmfa4

Vendor evalution has no link to the audit management.
this is strictly for supply chain

Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

Hi experts,
I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date. These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively. In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date). When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity. But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0. Does anyone know why there is no weight shown? I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting. Can anyone help? Thanks!
Regards,
Julie

Hi,
As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for