Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
Charudatta

Hi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items

Hi experts,
Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
Anybody face such issue before?
Plz provide your inputs..thanks!

Hi.
You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning). Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
regards,
Shashidar

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Vendor Evaluation Price Level For services

Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
Thanks !!

Hi,
Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Vendor Evaluation - Underdelivery Tolerance for Qty. reliability Criteria

Hi experts.
When using Underdelivery tolerance in a PO, the Evalation criteria Qty. reliability is not taking into account this tolerance and give a vendor a score based on the requested qty.
It doesn't make any sense to me, since I'm allowing the vendor to deliver up to this tolerance.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi,
When calculating score for quantity reliability, the Minimum delivery quantity % mentioned in customizing (Txn OMGL) is only taken into account, so that if the delivered quantity is below this then the score for the vendor will not be calculated.
The underdelivery tolerance is not checked. This is the standard functionality.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Vendor evaluation: Calculation of subcriteria.

Hi Gurús,
I would like to know, how subcriterias of criteria delivery is calculate it by the system
Thanks in advance
Regards
Enzo

The subcriteria of delivery is calculated based on the Info structure data.
it is automatically done by the system.
when you do the GR of the PO system update the info sturcture based on the deli date on the PO and GR receipt date
same way it is calculating the qunatity and updates the info structure and when you run the vendor evaluation it is fatching the data from this sturcture
that's the reason, point of this criteria you should keep automatic which is defined by the system.

Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

Dear Experts,
I have mention below % and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
-          100     On-time del.
1,0       90     On-time del.
2,0         95     On-time del.
10,0         80     On-time del.
20,0         60     On-time del.
30,0         40     On-time del.
40,0         20     On-time del.
50,         5     On-time del.
99,9           1     On-time del.
-5,0            95     On-time del.
-10,0     65     On-time del.
-20,0     75     On-time del.
-30,0     60     On-time del.
-40,0     40     On-time del.
-50,0     20     On-time del.
-60,0     5     On-time del.
-99,9     1     On-time del.
Thanks,

Hi Shyam,
I am also looking for the same.
can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic, Fully Automatic Evaluation. what is the difference.
what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
Regards,
Anthyodaya.

Vendor Evaluation - Calculating Price Statistics

All,
In vendor evaluation, can someone please provide details of how standard report calculates the price statistics. I know the data it uses, so plesae don't copy and paste links to SAP documentation.
Someone please provide a working example so I can see the calculation process.
Thanks.

The effective price store in the info sturcture S013 and when you do the GR/IR that time if any diff will be recorded to the infostructure and based on that system will calulate the price level
price behaviour will be based on the market price if you have maintianed in the system.

Vendor evaluation calculations

Dear experts,
I want to give some calculations in vendor evaluation.
For eg. .45 x Quantity supplied / Quantity ordered + .45 x Quantity accepted / Quantity supplied + .1 ISO
How to calculate.
Please guide me.
Asok

hi
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
regds
sri

Vendor Evaluation Report as per the delivery date

Dear Experts,
Please guide how view reports for
1. Varince of delivery date for goods recieved from the Vendor as per the delivery date in the PO.
2. Variance of delivery date for goods recieved from the Vendor as per Standard Varinace %age defined in purchasing Value Key ?
Regards,
Vikas

Hi Narendra,
Thxs for quik response,
I created Purchasing value key with Negative indicator like first reminder is -8.second is -4 and third is -2 and assigned the respetive material master and w r t material PO created. When i am doing ME9F exceuting its showing error No suitable purchasing documents found,while i am exceucting i select PO No,Purchase Org,application EF and message type MAHN but its shoing error ..kindly let me know how i can proceade.
Please note, My client requirment is once PO delivery date falls with the reminder period its should remind vendor through mail,
Regards
Santosh

Unsupplied vendors shouldnt consider during vendor evaluation

Dear Gurus,
At present during vendor evaluation system considering all vendors including un supplied for a period of time. the requirement is how , and where to exclude the unsupplied vendors, during the vendor evaluation , please share with full details im fresher in sap mm.

Do you have an evidence that the vendor evaluation calculated scores for a vendor who had not any transaction?

Vendor Evaluation - Price history

Hi
In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
Regards

to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Delete score in vendor evaluation

Hi, everyone!
How can i delete vendor evaluation score for delivery?
After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
Thanks

Hi,
GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
>07 automatic determination from system audit.
but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
with regards
Yashodhan

Tracing Vendor Evaluation Data

Hi friends,
I want to trace detail of Vendor Evaluation results. For example for a one vendor evaluation we used 5 different control party result. I would like to see this 5 value. Is it poosible? How?
Thanks, have a nice day

Thank you for your reply. Of course checked ME65. For example.
Vendor valuated for 120 days. Purchased raw material with 4 different order. Created 6 different control party. Now when I check the evaluation report at ME65.
X Vendor
Purchasing score %100
Quality score %75
@detail.
Quality score %75. Which control parties created for this score? How can I understand??

Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for