Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg

Dear Experts,
In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
(We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
Plz solve this issue.
full rewards assured.
Thanks & Regards,
Viju.

Hi,
I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

    Hi experts,
    I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date.  These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively.  In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date).  When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity.  But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0.  Does anyone know why there is no weight shown?  I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting.  Can anyone help?  Thanks!
    Regards,
    Julie

    Hi,
    As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
    Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
    Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
    an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
    here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

  • Vendor evaluation delivery rating

    hi,
    Presently working on vendor evaluation.
    i did config. but not getting proper result
    pl note the scenario; ifany body can help.
    a)On time delivery rating (ODR):- ODR is calculated to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
      Scoring Procedure:-
    ODR =1 if Goods receipt dateu2264 Specified delivery date
    ODR =0 if Goods receipt date>Specified delivery date
    b)     Quantity Rating (QNR):- QNR is calculated to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
    Scoring Procedure:-
    Quantity Rating Score (QNRS) = _Qty Received/Total qty to be delivered    *100
    QNRS                      QNR
    QNRSu2265100     1
    75u2264 QNRS <100     0.75
    50u2264 QNRS <75     0.50
    20u2264 QNRS <50     0.20
    0u2264 QNRS <20     0
    mainly problem is in spro-purchasingvendor evaluationdefine purchasing org data for vendor evaluation--pointscore
    if anybody can help
    regards

    Hi,
    Computing scores for DELIVERY, minimum delivery percentage and the standardizing value for delivery time variance are taken from the material master record(In purchasing value key) or from the fields : Minimum delivery qty. in percentage and Standard del. time variance fields in Txn: OMGL.
    1. You maintain minimum delivery percentage, if you do not want a vendor to receive a very good scoreif delivered goods on time, but not the exact qty.
    2. You maintain Standard del. time variance, to reate delivery dates variances in days.
    *% variance= (Difference between Statistical delivery date & GR Date)/Standard del. time variance 100.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Shilpa

  • Vendor  Evaluation - New Subcriteria  in Quality

    Hi,
    We want to go for new subcriteria in quality called "vendor returns" which should be calculated based on returned qty out of delivered qty by the user through User Exit.
    1 Which table will I be getting total delivered qty and returned qty for a vendor?
    2.Which user exit / FM to be used?
    Expecting your expertise.
    Regards,
    K Bharath

    Hi Bharath,
            There is no user exit available and suitable for you requirement. But, there is a work around. You can create a manual inspection lot and reject the material before sending it back to the vendor. The process will hit the same criterion of quality.
    Regards,
    Ashish J. K.

  • Vendor evaluation- delivery

    i am working on -on time delivery  performance sub criteria . i want to know how entries are made ( in which code )  into s013 table for the subciteria scores for different materials once goods receipt is done for a purchase order...?  i want to change the goods receipt date to posting date.

    df
    Edited by: AppasahebN on Dec 23, 2011 12:22 AM

  • Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

    Hi,
    I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
    But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
    As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
    Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Charudatta

    Hi,
    Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

    Dear all,
    I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
    For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
    Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
    Vendor XYZ
    Material ABC
    For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
    For 2010 Maket price 8.2  Effective price 8.5
    Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
    Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
    Vendor XYZ
    Material DEF
    For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
    For 2010 Maket price 20  Effective price 22
    Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
    When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
    5     Price behavior     5.0     10
    5     Price behavior     10.0     15
    5     Price behavior     20.0     20
    5     Price behavior     50.0     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0     10
    5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
    5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
    5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
    5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
    Pls help me resolve the issue
    Regards.
    Milind Dugade

    Hi Siva,
    [Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    [Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Reward if helpful.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Naveen Dasari
    Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores

    Dear Gurus,
    On what basis are the scores assigned for the percentage that is assigned.  For Eg. what do you mean by the following:
    Percentage   Score
    20.0-        10
    10.0-        65
      2.0-       100
      2.0        100
    10.0         50
    what does 20.0- mean and how is a score of 10 assigned to the same.same is the case for all the entries.
    Kindly explain me the entire process as to what does this percentage mean. Assume that we are evaluating the vendor based on Price.

    Hi,
    The system calculates the scores for vendor evaluation as follows.
    Calculating the Overall Score
    The system derives the overall score from the scores for the various main criteria, taking the
    weighting factors assigned by Purchasing in the system settings for each main criterion into
    account.
    The following example explains this process:
    Example
    The table below shows the scores for a vendor and their weighting factors:
    Main criterion Score Weighting factor
    Price 70 40
    Quality 85 25
    Delivery 50 10
    General service/support 50 5
    Converting Weighting Factors into Percentages
    To make the weighting factors clearer to the user, the system converts them into percentages.
    1. The system adds the factors together and equates the total with 100 %:
    40 + 25 + 10 + 5 = 80 equals 100 %
    2. To express the individual weighting factors as percentages of 100%, the system first divides
    100% by the sum of the weighting factors:
    100 / 80 = 1.25 %
    3. Then the system multiplies the weighting factors the buyer assigned to the main criteria by
    this figure:
    40 x 1.25 = 50.00 %
    25 x 1.25 = 31.25 %
    10 x 1.25 = 12.50 %
    5 x 1.25 = 6.25 %
    4. The following are the results of percentage of overall score
    Main criterion Score Percentage of overall score
    Price 70 50.00 %
    Quality 85 31.25 %
    Delivery 50 12.50 %
    General service/support 50 6.25 %
    However, internally, the system uses the weighting factors to compute the overall score.
    1. The scores for the main criteria are multiplied by their weighting factors.
    70 x 40 = 2800 points
    85 x 25 = 2125 points
    50 x 10 = 500 points
    50 x 5 = 250 points
    2. Total points = 5675.
    3. This total is divided by the sum of the weighting factors:
    5675 / 80 = 70.94 points
    The vendor is awarded an overall score of 71 points
    Please go though this link for clear understanding.
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards,
    Manik

  • Info Record with  Vendor Evaluation

    Hi gurus.
    I'm activating Vendor valuation functionality at ECC6.0, so I have defined the following:
    Main Criteria . 05-Services
    Subcriteria           1- Quality Services with scoring method C
                               2-Services timeliness with scoring methos D
    Both subcriteria are semi automatic, means is possible include any score via Info Record and after that run  vendor evaluation via ME61.
    When I try to update info record (Me12 ) via Extras->Vendor Evaluation, no subcriteria is showed for change. I just get Main criterion 05-Service. I think any customizing is missing..
    please advice...
    Best Regards.
    JB

    Hi Arminda.
    Yes, they were set as you mentioned but the  problem persist.
    Best regards.
    JB.

  • Score system in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Please explain how scoring system works in vendor evaluation for criteria Delivery and sub criterias on time delivery and qty reliability.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Jana

    Please check these answered links:
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ..
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ...???
    Vendor Evaluation-Delivery Score
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 21, 2010 1:58 PM

  • Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
    I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria  "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
    But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
    Pls advice on this.
    Regards,
    Venu

    Hi
    There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
    Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards
    Raja

  • Vendor evaluation: Calculation of subcriteria.

    Hi Gurús,
                   I would like to know, how subcriterias of criteria delivery is calculate it by the system
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Enzo

    The subcriteria of delivery is calculated based on the Info structure data.
    it is automatically done by the system.
    when you do the GR of the PO system update the info sturcture based on the deli date on the PO and GR receipt date
    same way it is calculating the qunatity and updates the info structure and when you run the vendor evaluation it is fatching the data from this sturcture
    that's the reason, point of this criteria you should keep automatic which is defined by the system.

  • Reg:Vendor Evaluation

    Hello Experts,
    I have small doubt in vendor evaluation; we are not purchased any material from vendor “X”. But when I run the evaluation transaction (ME61 and ME63) it will give the some score. My question is why it is giving score? It should be a 0.
    Kindly any one suggest me why it is happening.
    Reg/ Shankar

    Hi Shankar
    Manual scores can be given even when you did not purchase any material.
    This means you have given manual scores. The final score 46 is calculated based on the weightages you have given to price, quality & delivery.
    Does this clarify ?
    Best regards
    Ramki

  • Vendor Evaluation on Delivery

    Hi All,
    We have configured the vendor evaluation in our ECC 5.0 Dev system.
    We have Defined the main criteria, respective sub criteria s, weighting keys and also the purchase org level data.
    The weighting level is equal.
    The scoring methods have also been set such as:
    For Main Criteria Delivery,  Subcriterias such as On Time delivery, Quantity reliability, Adherence to confirmation date ...etc has been given the scoring methods.
    3 for On Time delivery
    2 for Quantity reliability
    B for Adherence to confirmation date.
    The point scores for these methods have also been set with scales such as
    for 5.0 %  score is 20
    for 20.0 %  score is 10
    for 50.0 %  score is 5
    for 99.9 %  score is 1
    In ME61 the vendor evaluation is created.
    We tried 2 scenarios.
    Scenario 1: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is done at a later date than mentioned in the PO as the delivery confirmation date.
    Scenario 2: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is taken for a quantity which is less than the quantity ordered.
    When the vendor evaluation is carried out in ME61 Automatic New Evaluation or ME63 we get the result for only price and that too
    The score is 1.
    The weighting is 100%
    The overall score is 1
    My Doubt is why isn't there a calculation on the scores done for criteria 03 - Delivery ???
    It shows a score of 0. But the scenarios mentioned should have populated the score for Delivery, I presume.
    Please advice where I have gone wrong or what is that I have missed to configure.
    Regards
    Govind
    Edited by: Govind Ramesh on Aug 23, 2011 11:54 AM

    I can see that you are using a ZSAP update group , and think this is the root cause for all your problems.
    See OSS Note 397864 - Self-defined info structures purchasing similar to S013
    it explains:
    Therefore, you are not permitted
    a) to use info structure S013 as a template for self-defined info structures (This is prevented as of Release 4.5 due to a termination message).
    b) to create any update rules for S013 with a self-defined update group.
    c) to include the enhanced update rules that are used for S013 during the definition of key figure updating into the definition of the update of a self-defined info structure (compute...).
    Sorry for this late update, just saw that you found it yourself, I had the reply open but then went for a breakfast without sending.
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 24, 2011 9:55 AM

  • Mapping Ontime delivery requirement in sap vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Have below requirement for calculating score for ontime delivery performance.
    1. Evaluation will be executed weekly once
    2. For the given weekf if18 are on time out of 20 total, then the vendor gets a 90% on time score
    Tried mapping this
    1. By making std.delivery date variance as 0
    2. Maintaining points as below
    0          100
    99.9      1
    but the above settings are not working. With the above settings, system is not even calculating the on-time delivery performance.
    with this I realized that maintaining  std.delivery date variance(at least 1) is mandatory for SAP.
    Can I one guide me how to map above requirement.
    Thanks in advance
    Hari

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Not authorization when create a global variant

    Hi developers, if i create a variant for execute a query in BI 7.0 with flag for user the system work, while I create a global variant I have problem with the authorization. There are specifics authorizations object for the creation of variant global

  • Need Notification for attaching the handler On Closing of the HTML Extension in Indesign CC 2014

    Need Notification for attaching the handler On Closing of the HTML Extension in Indesign CC 2014 Hi, I need to process a couple of tasks after clicking on cross button(on top right corner of HTML extension) and before the Extension actually gets clos

  • Upgrade Weblogic 8.1 with JMS 1.1

    Hello,           I am trying to use a Foreign JMS server that I would like to run within the same JVM are my Weblogic server. The foreign JMS is ActiveMQ and supports JCA. This is especially important for XA connections to be managed by the container

  • I have i Tunes Match and ICloud but my Ipad 16G is almost full.

    I bought the I cloud storage it says total storage 15GB Available 14.5GB and when I take a video I run out of space on my ipad. How can I manage this so I have more space to take photos and video when needed? I believe my music takes up 80% of this s

  • Opmn.exe the application failed to initialize properly

    hi, i have installed SOA for OBIEE on windows 2008 server. i am able to start the SOA without any issues but when i am logging off my windows machine i am getting this error and the SOA suite is getting shutdown opmn.exe the application failed to ini