Vendor evaluation - downgrade analysis

Hi,
I've a requiremnte in my project that the client wants to see why the grade for some criteria is below 100. So, I would like to know if I have any report showing de delays of the vendor and quantity difference in the goods receipt by Purchase Orden.
Then it will be possible to show vendor why he had a grade of 80.
Thanks in advance,
Guiza

there is no report in SAP that will give you the evaluation at document level.
Basis for the vendor evaluation is the data captured in info structure S012.
Here you can see the variations at least at period level  per vendor material combination.
so you can find the period that causes the bad valuation.
then you have to list the PO for that period in e.g. ME80FN or ME2L and evaluate the PO data yourself.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation and Analysis

    Hello,
    Where can i find " vendor evaluation and analysis" information from SRM 5.0 datasources. I looked at it and i couldnot find it. Is it from SRM or do we get the data from ECC.
    Need your assistance.
    Thanks,
    Lasya.

    From ECC.

  • Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg

    Dear Experts,
    In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
    (We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
    Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
    delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
    Plz solve this issue.
    full rewards assured.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Viju.

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • What is differnace betweem vendor evaluation & vendor analysis

    Hi,
            What is differnace betweem vendor evaluation & vendor analysis? Please, any one can elaborate it?
    ( In domain they have different terminology)
    if there is differnce between these two term, How we do in SAP MM. I mean is there any Tcode for this?
    Regards,

    Pls go through the below link..
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=68747605
    BR

  • ME6H - Vendor Evaluation Analysis

    Hi Guru´s,
                    Im running the report "Vendor Evaluation Analysis". The system show me some columns with Key figures.
    I would like to Know if it is possible to change the name of the Key figures becuase it seems like technic name, and I want the standar name.
    Example:  QtyRL1 (technic name).
                    Qty.Reliability 1 (standar name).
    Thanks in advance for the help
    Regards
    Enzo

    Thanks for the answer...
    Please, can you explain me how can i do what you told me.
    Regards.
    Enzo

  • Vendor Evaluation

    Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at  material level  for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance   at  material level .
    Example :
    Materials  A and B were  purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
    The  on time delivery for Material A as 100 %  ( if he did good performance )
    The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance  ) ,they  donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
    The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
    Any Thoughts on that?

    Hi Tafanzas,
    The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
    BR
    Raf

  • Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

    Hi everyone,
    Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
    any other Program names will also do...
    Thanks
    Sukriti...

    hi
    S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
    ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
    ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
    ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
    ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
    ME65 - Evaluation Lists
    regards
    kunal

  • MATERIAL & VENDOR EVALUTION

    CAN ANY BODY DONE MATERIAL & VENDOR  EVALUTION  LIKE MY SCENARIO IS  I  CONFIGURED 3 SELECTED  AS A  ACCEPTED ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION AND  ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY AND REJECTED   I DONE  QUALITY SCORE  ACCEPTED 100 ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION 70 ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY 30 REJECTED 1
    IN CONFIGURATION DEFINITION OF QUALITY SCORE CLASS LIMIT I ALSO CONFIGURED  BUT WHAT IS THE MEAN OF EXPONENTIAL AND EQUIDISTANT IF I ASSIGN MY QUALITY SCORE  USAGE INDICATOR  ANYTHING WILL HAPPEN OR WE CAN AND I ALSO  TRIED ASSIGNED QUALITY SCORE CLASSES  FOR  INFO STRUCTURE SYSTEM NOT ALLOWED
    FINALLY HOW  I WILL ASSIGN  MY QUALITY SCORE TO MATERIAL ANALYSIS AND VENDOR ANALYSIS KINDLY GUIDE ME IF ANY BODY DONE THIS  SCENARIO.

    I hope you would have wrote it readable & formatted in good sentence...........
    Nevertheless.......
    As per SAP std settings....................
    Both uniform and exponentially weighted classifications are predefined in the standard system. The uniform classification is proposed as the default.
    Equidistant is uniform one ...uni formally increasing where as Exponential score is exponentially which is predefined.
    Now Its only "statistics" & not "Evaluation" info structure you can assign here............
    Warning: You cannot change classifications that have already been used! First, you must delete the data contents in the related information structures. You can then change the classification. Finally, you must update the information structures to provide them with data entries, provided that the original documents have not already been archived.

  • Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
    Regards,
    Pratap

    Hello,
    If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
    report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
    What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
    Example:
    If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
    Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
    Regards,

  • Query related to vendor evaluation

    Hi Experts,
    I want to start evaluating some of my suppliers. 
    Specifically, I would like to evaluate suppliers for 1) on-time delivery  2) did they send the Certificate of Analysis as requested.
    How can i achieve this in system
    What transaction is the best for this?
    How exactly do I run it (choices to make, etc)?
    Where is the COA information available ?
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prakash

    Dear all
        You can do vendor evaluation by 3 ways
    1.Automatic--Pre-requisite master data
    2.Semi-automatic--Pre-requisite master data
    3.Manual- No need of master data
    You need to do some configuration before doing vendor evaluation,
    Ven eval. can be done only at pur.Org level.
    You can set your own criteria for Ven eval
    Standard criteria in SAP is Price,Quality,Delivery & service.
    Do you want to know further let me know
    Regards
    M.Chandra mohan

  • ME6H :  point score for vendor evaluation

    Dear guru ,
    In vendor evaluation analysis for on-time delivery performance
    I can see fields point score 1 and point score 2.
    Can  you explain me which is the difference between these two fields ?
    Thanks in advance.

    HI,
    ON TIME DEL 1-it is for a specific period(day,month,yr)
    ON TIME DEL 1-cumilative value

  • Vendor evaluation cube ?

    Hello ,
    I was just going through business content cube for vendor evaluation and i could see mutipple cube with same name in convention .
    Could you please let me know which one is the latest one and how to determine it ?
    Vendor Evaluation  Technical name: 0PUR_C02
    Vendor Evaluation Data   Technical name: 0PUR_C05
    Vendor Evaluation Data (Semi-Automatic)  Technical name: 0PUR_C06
    Subsequent Settlement u2013 Evaluation   Technical Name: 0PUR_C03
    Which one should i active ?
    Regards

    Hi,
    It depends on your reuirement for Vendor analysis, and you need to activate all/some  of them.
    For example ; you can take some of the infoobjects like
    0PUR_C02 - Vendor information, material, purches org, plant and some score fields as key figure
    0PUR_C05- Overall score , score on time basic , delivery basic etc.. and create a generic datasource for the  above required fields and pull the data from R/3 to BW.
    Also pls chk this link;
    Re: Vendor evaluation infosource
    Regards
    CSM Reddy

  • ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background

    Dear Gurus,
    Can explain me this transcation ME6G - Vendor Evaluation in Background . How to execute this by steps?
    Please advice me
    THanks
    Rs

    Dear,
    You can evaluate your vendors on a regular basis by means of background processing. The Evaluation in the Background function can be found in the Purchasing menu.
    If you want to start a background processing request for vendor evaluation, you need a variant (to limit the number of vendors to be evaluated, for example).
    Maintaining and Displaying Variants
    When you invoke the Evaluation in the Background function, you can display existing variants in editing mode of the step list, and create new variants or change existing ones.
    To do so, choose Edit Steps and then
    Goto Variant (to display), or
    Goto Variant maintenance (to create)
    Procedure
    Choose Master data - Vendor evaluation.- Follow-on functions - Evaluation in the background.
    On the initial screen, enter a job name and the name of the variant. Specify when the background evaluation should take place and how often it should be repeated.
    Save the background processing request.
    You require certain authorizations in order to carry out evaluations in the background and define new variants. If you have any queries in this connection, please consult your system administrator.
    If you require more detailed information about working with background processing requests, please refer to the documentation Getting Started with R/3.
    Subsequent Maintenance of Background Evaluations
    In background processing, you usually evaluate vendors belonging to the same group (that is, vendors who have the same weighting key). However, it is possible that you have selected an interval that contains different groups of vendors. For this reason, you have not entered a weighting key.
    To ensure that the scores are calculated correctly, you must therefore subsequently maintain the weighting key for such evaluation records at certain intervals of time.
    The evaluation records in question can be determined using the analysis report Vendors Without Weighting Keys.
    This function can be found in the purchasing menu under Master data - Vendor Evaluation - Follow-on functions - Vendors without weighting key
    From this report you can branch directly into the screens for maintaining evaluations.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • Vendor Open Item Analysis by Overdue Items

    Hi Freinds,
    The users desire to generate the Vendor Open Item Analysis by Overdue Items. When the report is generated using the Program RFKOPR10, the report gives the list of Vendors with the details of overdues as per the buckets selected. However, along with the Vendor Codes, the list gives the short name of the Vendor, which is picked form the 'Search Feild' in the Vendor Master and is the short name, whereas the users desire to have the full name exhibited in the report.
    How can we have the full name in the report instead of the short name? Can any one help us in this matter?
    Thanks for the assistance.
    Regards

    Hello Pankaj,
    Thanks for the prompt response. Our problem is that we require an AP Aging Analysis giving the overdue amounts by days - such as 30/60/90/120/>120. We are able to get the report but the name is not appearing in full. How can we have the full name displayed in the Report?
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for