Vendor Evaluation implementation

Dear Buddies
This has reference to the subject matter, we needs to implement the Vendor Evaluation in SAP, being an Audit Requirement.
We needs to fix the following parameters for the same:
"QUOTE"
CRITERIA FOR VENDOR RATING
                    W1xQr + W2xDr + W3xSr + W4xAr
Vendor Rating (VRML) =     -
                              100
     Where      Rating          Weightage          To be rated by
     Quality (Qr)          W1 = 50          Unit Mat Deptt/ Stores
     Delivery (Dr)          W2 = 30          Unit Mat Deptt/Stores
     Service (Sr)          W3 = 10          Purchase Department
     Adaptability (Ar)          W4 = 10          Purchase Department
     1)      QUALITY RATING (Qr)      =     (Q1 + Q2 x 0.8 + Q3 x 0.5 + Q4 x 0)
                                             Q
          Where   Q =      Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4
               Q1 =     Quantity Accepted
               Q2 =     Quantity accepted with Deviation (Demerit Factor = 0.8)
               Q3 =     Quantity accepted after rework (Demerit Factor = 0.5)
               Q4 =     Quantity Rejected
     2)     DELIVERY RATING (Dr)      =      Q1 x 100
                                         Q
          Where   Q =      Total consignments delivered
                          Q1 =     Consignments delivered in Time
3)     SERVICE RATING (Sr)      
           To be given on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the Very Good Service, 
           Response Time, both Pre- Sales and After-Sales. e.g. 7 point = 70%).
4)     ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGES & IMPROVEMENT (Ar)      
           To be given on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the Proactive in Improving the      Product &   Service, Very much Adaptable to Changes. e.g. 7 point = 70%).
VENDOR RATING GRADES
          A     100 u2013 80 %
          B     79 u2013 70 %
          C     69 u2013 60 %
          D     < 60 %
I just aware where we can do the configurations. But not understanding how to put the scores, weight ?

Dear Friends
Can you explain how to calculate this things thro VE implementation ? Where i can mention in configurations to calculate the these ratings?
QUALITY RATING (Qr)      =     (Q1 + Q2 x 0.8 + Q3 x 0.5 + Q4 x 0)/ Q
Where   Q =      Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4
               Q1 =     Quantity Accepted
               Q2 =     Quantity accepted with Deviation (Demerit Factor = 0.8)
               Q3 =     Quantity accepted after rework (Demerit Factor = 0.5)
               Q4 =     Quantity Rejected
DELIVERY RATING (Dr)      =      Q1 x 100 /    Q
          Where   Q =      Total consignments delivered
                          Q1 =     Consignments delivered in Time
There after only I can do the these ratings weighing %. Please help me out

Similar Messages

  • Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented)

    Hi
    Can I have more input on Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented)  please ?

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation can be automatic, manually or semi automatic. It is done on 4 criteria;
    1.     Price
    2.     Quantity
    3.     Delivery
    4.     Service 
    VE is done at p.org level, the Maximum no. of criteria that can be used are up to 99.
    IT is done in 4 steps:-
    1.     Define Weighing keys( equal weighing for all criteria or unequal weighing )
    2.     Define criteria
    3.     Define Scope of list
    4.     Define Pur. Org data for vendor.
    5.     
    SPRO—MM—PURCHASING --- VENDOR EVALUATION 
    ME61 Maintain vendor evaluation (Put p.org and vendor)
    Then ME65 Ranking list of vendor….
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Vendor Evaluation in SAP

    Hi SAP Experts,
    We want to implement the vendor evaluation system for all material and service vendors in SAP. We have evaluated the standard functionality in SAP and most of the requirements are met if we use the standard system. But we are facing few major problems.
    Firstly it is regarding the evaluation level. The purchasing team wants to do the evaluation for each purchase order raised for the vendor. As per my understanding, we can do the vendor evaluation at the most at the purchasing info record level. This might not be sufficient for us.
    Secondly, we have a lot of cases of Service POs where we dont have info records since materials are not involved. I am not sure if the standard system would work in evaluating such cases at each PO level.
    Appreciate your comments and suggestions.
    Thanx & Regards,
    Sateesh

    Hi,
    Evaluating the vendor at PO level meaning we want to evaluate the performance of the vendor for each PO / Service PO. We want a provision to enter the ratings for each criterion for each PO. e.g. Quality of material for PO 45_01 and PO 45_02 would be evaluated seperately. Then we would like to consolidate the data at the vendor level.
    Hope this clarifies the doubt.
    Regards,
    Sateesh

  • Vendor evaluation reports

    Hey Gurus,
    During the pre-study for implementation of the vendor evaluation tool in R/3 my business team has asked for reports showing the data/orders behind the evaluations. If, for instance, a low score is computed for the u201COn-time deliveryu201D criterion they would like to know which orders/deliveries have caused this low score for a vendor.
    They see a danger in contacting vendors with low scores and complaining/trying to negotiate better rates based on scores without being able to tell how the scores were calculated and which orders were u201Cbadu201D.
    Hope you can help.
    Thanks in advance.
    K.R.
    Dag

    Hi,
    Normally you can use the "Additional Info´s" functionality but
    the function 'Additional Infos' is not available for all subcriterias.
    Especially for the delivery criterias it is not possible, because there
    is no more detailed information in the system about the score which is
    already shown on vendor/material level.
    The scores of delivery criterias are calculated for each GR but the
    scores are not stored on this level in statistics. The scores are
    stored on 'Inforecord-level' therefore there is no lower level
    available in the protocol (no more detailed information about this
    line).The function 'Detailed information' is only available for
    criterias with type '4' pricelevel
                        '5' pricehistory
                        '7' Quality lot GR
                        '9' Quality lot audit
                        '1' semi-autom. Criterias.
    So, you can not have this information in the standard.
    Best Regards,
    Arminda Jack

  • Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date

    Hi,
    The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
    After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
    But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
    Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
    with regards

    Use this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
    Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM

  • Vendor Evaluation - complaints/rejections

    Hi friends,
    I'm going to implement vendor evaluation without QM. But my customer wants to evaluate the vendors using the number of complaints.
    Can I use Quality subcriteria complaints/rejections only creating a notification? If so, where do I change the points/scores determination for that subcriteria?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    plz refer above link
    hope it helps

  • Vendor evaluation in SRM

    Hi experts
    I need implement SRM vendor evaluation and I would likte to know maore informations abaout it.
    Someone could explain me hot works the processes of evaluation based in Goods receipt, invoice verification, confirmations vendor list?
    Thaks
    Nilson

    I am interested in this also. Need to trigger Evaluation survey being sent out when GR is posted.

  • Perform VENDOR EVALUATION for MORE THAN ONE VENDORS at a time

    Hello all,
    Please guide for any process where i can perform Vendor Evaluation for MORE THAN ONE vendors AT A TIME.
    At my location there are around thousand vendors, which are to be evaluated, and difficult to perform the evaluation process one-by-one.
    (ME61/ME62/ME63)
    Detailed replies with various possibilities would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Joy Ghosh

    The vendor evaluation for some thousand vendors at the same time has already been in SAP long before they developed LSMW. The purpose of LSMW is to load data from a legacy system, of course you can (mis-)use it for a lot other things.
    But you should not always use LSMW if you are to lazy to go thru the SAP standard menu to find a transaction like ME6G
    There you define a job that runs RM06LBAT report.
    You first have to define a selection variant for this report. this can be done in SE38 by entering the report name, select variant, clicking display, then entering a name for the variant and clicking Create.

  • Vendor Evaluation

    Business Requires that for Vendor Evaluation, the scores to be at  material level  for the same vendor which means if they put the vendor number in the report parameter , the system will give them the vendor performance   at  material level .
    Example :
    Materials  A and B were  purchased 10 times from vendor 100001 so the system will give:
    The  on time delivery for Material A as 100 %  ( if he did good performance )
    The on time delivery for material B as 50% ( if he did bad performance  ) ,they  donu2019t want the system to give the on time delivery for both the material as 75% (100+50 )
    The benefit of this is that SRS can find out another resources for the material with bad performance .
    Any Thoughts on that?

    Hi Tafanzas,
    The Vendor Evaluation system actually collects data on material level and then accumulates it for display in e.g. trs ME65. The data are collected in LIS and you can run the analyses from there using trs ME6H.
    BR
    Raf

  • Vendor Evaluation Report

    Hi All,
    We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
    The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
    Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards
    VT

    hi
    for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM

  • Standard report for Vendor Evaluation

    Hi everyone,
    Is there any standard reports (ALV) to display Vendor evaluation ranking list except ME65, ME6B, ME6H.
    any other Program names will also do...
    Thanks
    Sukriti...

    hi
    S_ALR_87012990 - Evaluation Comparison
    ME6H - Standard Analysis: Vendor Evaluation
    ME6E - Evaluation Records Without Weighting
    ME6C - Vendors Without Evaluation
    ME6B - Display Vendor Evaluation for Material
    ME65 - Evaluation Lists
    regards
    kunal

  • Custom report for vendor evaluation

    Hai All,
    My client requires custom report to show the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format for the purpose of TPM  audit.
    Regards
    R.Senthilnambi

    Hi Senthil,
    u can download the documents from sap help to show the logic to ur audit, how sap will calculate the scores.
    If they insist for certain data with logic, u can develop a z-report and show them for 10 or 20 materials.
    hope this resolves ur problem

  • Goods receipt sub critaria in vendor evaluation

    In vendor evaluation there is one sub-critaria goods receipt under main critaria quality, in this how system calcutae the tax.
    i went through the sap help doc, in this it is mentiaoned that
    "When you run an automatic re-evaluation for a vendor, the system selects all the incoming inspection lots for the vendor that lie within the validity period and calculates the average of the scores. The result is the vendor's score for the quality of goods received."
    i m not understand with this. plz specify in your words and where we maintain the validity period?

    Hi,
    In the sub-criteria Goods Receipt, system dows not calculate tax. In the main criteria of Quality, if your material is maintained for quality inspection type 01, then system creates inspection lots for GRN. The score of each inspection lot is calculated based on you settings (For example based on usage decision). The system then saves these scores of each inspection lot. These scores are then averaged out for all the inspection lots those lie within the validity periods.
    Hope this helps,
    Regards,
    Prashant

  • Performance in Vendor Evaluation (ME61)

    Hi, I configured a new subcriteria (Complaints) in the Quality criteria, and after my job of Vendor Evaluation decreased the performance.
    Is there any procedure to increase the performance?
    Regards,
    Anna Pinheiro

    Dear Sachin,
    You can go to SPROMM-Purchasing-Vendor evaluationMaintain P.Organization data .
    Then select the P.Org , then go to point score for automatic criteria.
    You also can maintain the smoothing factor , min delv.var,etc, Just double click(go to detail) when you select the p.org.
    The percentage score is define as per business req.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Vendor evaluation report to be run for previous period

    Hi,
    Is the possible to run the Vendor evaluation report for back date.
    i.e. if the period of evaluation is 30 days, can we run the report for previous periods
    Regds,
    Ritesh

    Depending on the library you are using, can you verify whether you can use one of the following variables?
    1PERIK   
    1PERW   
    5ACPERI  
    6-PERIK  
    8WPERIO
    All these variables use fiscal periods and not calendar periods, that way you don't have to bother about number of weeks in a period, unless you really need to do the calculation based on number of days in a period.
    If your library does not support these variables, then pl copy one of these variables (GS11) with appropriate details into a custom variable and use it in your report.
    Let me know.
    Regards
    Subodh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to update CC Desktop ...

    -SMB environment -Computer account is  a member of a Windows domain  -Microsoft Windows 8.1 Enterprise (64-bit) 1) User receives notification of available update for CC 2) User attempts to install updates 3) User doesn't have admin privileges so they

  • Windows Vista on MacBook Pro?

    Can I install a purchased copy of Windows Vista on my new MacBook Pro, or will it only accept Windows 7?

  • Provisioning to AD - in another forest

    Hi, I have tried to setup FIM2010 to provision users to AD (different forest). While configuring the AD MA, have provided IP address in the place of server, and UPN for login and left the domin blank. Have configured "Preferred DC" to use in the MA.

  • URLXML fetchlet: how to map Tabledescritptor with QueryDescriptor

    I have a problem: 1. I have a xml file which looks like this <?xml version="1.0" ?> <testfile>1</testfile> 2. my URLFetchlet looks like this <QueryDescriptor FETCHLET_ID="URLXML"> <Property NAME="url" SCOPE="GLOBAL">http://thil0010:7001/examplesWebAp

  • 2010 12Core MacPro not booting Win Installer

    I am trying to install Win7 Home Premium 64Bit on my MacPro (2010, 12 Core, ATI 5870). I assigned an internal hdd to windows and the bootcamp assistant is booting the machine from the Win7 DVD. I can see the typical PC bios white-on-black text, when