Vendor Evaluation : Manual changes

Dear  All ,
We have taken Autometic vendor Evaluation for sm vendors .
In One case i need to change manually the score for one criteria ?
How to do the same ?
REgards
Edited by: venky  shree on Sep 22, 2008 12:27 PM

Hi,
spro - MM- purchasing - vendor evaluation -
1) define weight keys: equal / un equal
2) define criteria : based on creteris u select like price, delivary , service...
3) Miantainpur org data: based on ur pur org data u can set the evaluation; u select pur org & click on points score for the automatic creteria, u select based on client, then set & save
Pandari

Similar Messages

  • Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

    Hi,
    I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
    Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
    Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards

    hi,
    Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
    Variance             Score
    -99.9%               1
    +99.9%              100
    A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
    check the following link.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    regards
    sumit simran

  • Vendor Evaluation Index Recalculate

    Dear Sir,
    We have a scenario where we have already calculated Vendor Evaluation Score for a Vendor and saved it . Now we want to recalculated the score again as we have done some changes in the img setting . Kindly guide us how to go for score reclculation . Can simply running the tcode ME61 , recalculate the score and overwrite the already saved score .
    Pl help us .
    Regards
    Sonia Agarwal

    Hi.
    Recalculate the scores by ME63 & not by ME61.
    It is not possible to recalculate every time the vendor evaluation scores manually by ME63.
    Create background job for this with T.code ME6G.
    Regards,
    Satpal

  • Info Record with  Vendor Evaluation

    Hi gurus.
    I'm activating Vendor valuation functionality at ECC6.0, so I have defined the following:
    Main Criteria . 05-Services
    Subcriteria           1- Quality Services with scoring method C
                               2-Services timeliness with scoring methos D
    Both subcriteria are semi automatic, means is possible include any score via Info Record and after that run  vendor evaluation via ME61.
    When I try to update info record (Me12 ) via Extras->Vendor Evaluation, no subcriteria is showed for change. I just get Main criterion 05-Service. I think any customizing is missing..
    please advice...
    Best Regards.
    JB

    Hi Arminda.
    Yes, they were set as you mentioned but the  problem persist.
    Best regards.
    JB.

  • Vendor evaluation in purchase order (vendor unknown)

    Hi!
    I created 2 new evaluation criteria for vendor evaluation.
    When i go to tcode ME25 "create PO vendor unknown", I assign the source of suplly and click on "vendor evaluation" my 2 new criterias do not appear in the "Ranking list of vendors".
    Any ideas?
    Regards.

    I think the new vendor is having a different pricing schema than the old vendor. Check the pricing schema for the old vendor (in purchasing view in field 'Schema Group. vendor) and compare it to the new vendor. I think they're different.
    If it is then what i think happening is the user already input the price for the condition type in pricing schema A, then the vendor is changed and the new pricing schema is kiciking in thus making the old condition type missing.
    Try to either:
    A. Change to the old vendor back,
    B. Change the pricing schema of the new vendor to be the same with old vendor

  • MATERIAL & VENDOR EVALUTION

    CAN ANY BODY DONE MATERIAL & VENDOR  EVALUTION  LIKE MY SCENARIO IS  I  CONFIGURED 3 SELECTED  AS A  ACCEPTED ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION AND  ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY AND REJECTED   I DONE  QUALITY SCORE  ACCEPTED 100 ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION 70 ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY 30 REJECTED 1
    IN CONFIGURATION DEFINITION OF QUALITY SCORE CLASS LIMIT I ALSO CONFIGURED  BUT WHAT IS THE MEAN OF EXPONENTIAL AND EQUIDISTANT IF I ASSIGN MY QUALITY SCORE  USAGE INDICATOR  ANYTHING WILL HAPPEN OR WE CAN AND I ALSO  TRIED ASSIGNED QUALITY SCORE CLASSES  FOR  INFO STRUCTURE SYSTEM NOT ALLOWED
    FINALLY HOW  I WILL ASSIGN  MY QUALITY SCORE TO MATERIAL ANALYSIS AND VENDOR ANALYSIS KINDLY GUIDE ME IF ANY BODY DONE THIS  SCENARIO.

    I hope you would have wrote it readable & formatted in good sentence...........
    Nevertheless.......
    As per SAP std settings....................
    Both uniform and exponentially weighted classifications are predefined in the standard system. The uniform classification is proposed as the default.
    Equidistant is uniform one ...uni formally increasing where as Exponential score is exponentially which is predefined.
    Now Its only "statistics" & not "Evaluation" info structure you can assign here............
    Warning: You cannot change classifications that have already been used! First, you must delete the data contents in the related information structures. You can then change the classification. Finally, you must update the information structures to provide them with data entries, provided that the original documents have not already been archived.

  • Is Quality management module required to be used for vendor evaluation?

    Hi,
    There is vendor evaluation functionality in MM. Is use of quality management module is mandatory for this? I wish to track the performance of vendor regarding quality (How much he has supplied, out of which how many are accepted and how many are rejected). Can I get this report without using QM?
    Thanks in advance,
    Satish

    you can enter Quality results manually in vendor evealuation, so QM is not necessary for this, however with QM you can get the scores semi-automatic and  automatically.

  • ME6H - Vendor Evaluation Analysis

    Hi Guru´s,
                    Im running the report "Vendor Evaluation Analysis". The system show me some columns with Key figures.
    I would like to Know if it is possible to change the name of the Key figures becuase it seems like technic name, and I want the standar name.
    Example:  QtyRL1 (technic name).
                    Qty.Reliability 1 (standar name).
    Thanks in advance for the help
    Regards
    Enzo

    Thanks for the answer...
    Please, can you explain me how can i do what you told me.
    Regards.
    Enzo

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • PO Valuation Type for Vendor Evaluation

    Dear Gurus
    I want to ask, can the Vendor evaluation program in SAP check the Purch.Order up to Valuation type ?
    So the VE program can differ the valuation type in Purchase order.
    Any respond are highly regarded
    Thanks and Best Regards
    Christian
    Edited by: C J Lee on Feb 1, 2011 6:38 AM

    Hi Piyush,
    Your answer is correct. Val type does not come from info record to MRP created PRs, even there is a fixed vendor in the PR, coming from source list.
    But, this happens in the PO, that val type is an obligatory field, for a split valuated material.
    In PR, it can only be maintained manually, I guess.

  • Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

    Hello All,
    Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
    1) Effective Price
    2) Calculated Effective Price
    3) Actual Effective Price
    4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
    I see all this in the following link
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    Under "How the System computes Scores:"
    Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
    Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
    Thanks

    Hi ZEYNEP,
    1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.)  into account.
    2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
    3) Total value = total quantity x price
    When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
    4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
    In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
    Here is an example
    Material Price is $ 1000/-
    & Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
    So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
    Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
    Here Net Price $ 900/-
    Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
    Freight $ 50/-
    $ 1040/-
    The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
    Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
    Thanks

  • Vendor Evaluation - Price history

    Hi
    In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
    The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
    What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
    Regards

    to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
    The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
    If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
    If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
    The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
    The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
    This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
    The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

  • Vendor Evaluation Period Selection

    Dear Sir,
    We use ME63 for Vendor Evaluation , here we do not find any option to give  the period over which Vendor should be Evaluated . We have a requirement that Vendor Evaluation must be based upon the Purchases made during period 1-DEC-2007 to 31-DEC-2008 .
    Kindly guide us , as how can be achive it please .
    Rgds
    B Mittal

    Hi
    Standard SAP does not provide you such a facility, wherein you can run the vendor evaluation for a specific date range.
    There is a days selecion criteria in customizing settings for a purchasing organization wherein you specify the no. of days which needs to be considered for reporting from the current date, the documents that are posted within that date range from the current date are only taken into consideration for vendor evaluation.
    You can manually maintain the number of days in the customizing, which needs to be considered for scores calculation.
    Thanks
    E.Avudaiappan.

  • Price level in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    I have created 1st PO with price 50 and checked the ME63, system showed score for price level as 40. Then I made another PO with price 55 and checked ME63, system displayed the same score 40,
    While there is change in price of 10 %, so I was expecting score of 10 .
    Can anyone explain about this.

    Hi,
    Following is the calculation procedure for
    1) Price Level -
    If you have maintained market price for the material, the system checks vendor's price level with the market price, otherwise it compares the vendor's price with average price of material by all vendors. Then the price variance is calculated in percentage. The score is awarded for this price variance as per settings in your system configuration. This process is repeated for all the materials supplied by the vendor. The overall score is the average of all these scores.
    2) Price Behaviour -
    System checks market price / average price of the material for last year as well as for current year. System calculates the percentage change for the market price. System repeats this procedure for price of material by vendor. Then system compares these two values & calculates percentage variance. The score is awarded for this variance as per system configuration. The overall score is the average of all these scores of the materials.
    3)Online Delivry statistics -
    System calculates the difference between scheduled delivery date in PO & actual delivery date & calculates the percentage variance. The score is awarded as per settings in system configuration. This process is repeated for each P.O. & overall score is average of all these values.
    Hope the answer is helpfull. For more details, you can avail online help at site http//:help.sap.com on subject Vendor Evaluation.
    Regards,
    Prashant Kolhatkar

  • Delete score in vendor evaluation

    Hi, everyone!
    How can i delete  vendor evaluation score for delivery?
    After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
    If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
    Thanks

    Hi,
            GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
    >07 automatic determination from system audit.
    but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
    with regards
    Yashodhan

Maybe you are looking for