Vendor evaluation on JIT delivery

In case of JIT scenario how vendor rating on delivery, as schedule lines are dynamically changed in past and future.
Does this mean that for a JIT scenario vendor is suppose to be delivering on time? And rating could be affected. Is there sufficient justification for this functionality not being available? Most of the automotive industry works on daily JIT schedules.  Clients say that it is important for the on-time and quantity reliability of vendors to be evaluated based on Goods receipt against JIT call. How vendor evaluation can be performed based goods receipt using JIT call.
Rgs

Hi Pankaj,
I found a table called T147K ..
I am passing xyz Purch Org. and Scoring Method is 3 (on-time delivery)..
Here I found that
Percentage Score Percenta
000        100   100.0
010        90    101.0
020        95    102.0
100        80    110.0
200        60    120.0
300        40    130.0
400        20    140.0
500         5    150.0
999         1    199.9
050        95    95.0
100        65    90.0
200        75    80.0
300        60    70.0
400        40    60.0
500        20    50.0
600         5    40.0
999         0     0.1
which one we need to consider when .. I am doing the calcuation to get percentage for vendor...
Vendor Percentage =
( actual Del date - statistical del date) / Std del time var * 100.
Raghunath.S
Edited by: Raghunath Shyamala on Aug 29, 2008 1:07 PM

Similar Messages

  • Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del

    hi
    We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
    The requirement is:
    Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
    pl suggest

    Hi Chintu,
    Thanks for ur reply.
    scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
    2     Qty. reliability                      100
    2     Qty. reliability     5.0-              90
    2     Qty. reliability     10.0-      80
    2     Qty. reliability     20.0-      75
    2     Qty. reliability     40.0-      50
    2     Qty. reliability     50.0-      40
    2     Qty. reliability     75.0-      20
    2     Qty. reliability     80.0-        1
    My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
    So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
    I have maintained smoothing factor for
    Timeliness service -  .20
    Quantity Reliability - .30
    Shipping Instructions - .25.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
    Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM

  • Vendor Evaluation on time delivery criteria based on Month

    Dear Gurus,
    I have requirement that , in vendor evaluation the score calculation based on sub criteria on time delivery should not be on date basis , but need on period basis.
    Ex. I am giving PO to Vendor and delivery date criteria is on month basis means whole month he can provide me material based on his capacity. date is not fixed.
    can system score on the basis of period or it will be always on date basis, please guide me.
    Thanks & Regards
    Akshay

    I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
    A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
    So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get  a 100 %

  • Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

    Hi experts,
    I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date.  These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively.  In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date).  When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity.  But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0.  Does anyone know why there is no weight shown?  I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting.  Can anyone help?  Thanks!
    Regards,
    Julie

    Hi,
    As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
    Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
    Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
    an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
    here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

  • Delete score in vendor evaluation

    Hi, everyone!
    How can i delete  vendor evaluation score for delivery?
    After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
    If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
    Thanks

    Hi,
            GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
    >07 automatic determination from system audit.
    but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
    with regards
    Yashodhan

  • Score system in vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Please explain how scoring system works in vendor evaluation for criteria Delivery and sub criterias on time delivery and qty reliability.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Jana

    Please check these answered links:
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ..
    Vendor Evaluation  Score ...???
    Vendor Evaluation-Delivery Score
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Apr 21, 2010 1:58 PM

  • Mapping Ontime delivery requirement in sap vendor evaluation

    Hi,
    Have below requirement for calculating score for ontime delivery performance.
    1. Evaluation will be executed weekly once
    2. For the given weekf if18 are on time out of 20 total, then the vendor gets a 90% on time score
    Tried mapping this
    1. By making std.delivery date variance as 0
    2. Maintaining points as below
    0          100
    99.9      1
    but the above settings are not working. With the above settings, system is not even calculating the on-time delivery performance.
    with this I realized that maintaining  std.delivery date variance(at least 1) is mandatory for SAP.
    Can I one guide me how to map above requirement.
    Thanks in advance
    Hari

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

    Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
    Regards,
    M.M

    Dear Magesh,
    This is for On time delivery:
    ===========================================================
    At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
    GR date - delivery date = date variance
    If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
    It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
    – If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
    If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
    – If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
    If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
    If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
    If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
    In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
    It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
    – If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
    If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
    – in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
    – in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
    – If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
    – in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
    – in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
    The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
    When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
    If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
    This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
    The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
    The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
    Adherence to Conf. Date :
    ===========================================================
    1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
    If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
    GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
    2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
    a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
    b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
    c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
    3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
    4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
    6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor’s score for adherence to the confirmation date.
    If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
    This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
    The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
    The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
    Regards,
    w1n

  • Vendor Evaluation - Statistical Delivery Date

    Hi,
    The statistical delivery date is an important field during the calculation of the on-time delivery score. (see note 310666)
    After implementing a new support package this field wasn't filled up automatically anymore. Fortunately note 1039344 and 1164767 helped overcome this.
    But ... in the meantime purchase orders were created and received without a statistical delivery date.
    Which date / or what does sap do when calculating on-time delivery score if there is no statistical delivery date ? Does it take the "delivery date" into account ?
    with regards

    Use this link http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Or find on the SAP help Vendor evaluation white Paper its there.
    Edited by: Prashant Prasad on Jul 31, 2009 12:01 PM

  • Reg: Vendor Evaluation - Criteria "Delivery"

    Hi Gurus,
    I am in process of vendor evaluation in system. Confguration is maintained and I am opting for Automatic vendor evaluation and our interest is in Price and delivery. When I am doing Vendor evaluation in ME61,
    I am getting the automatic values for Criteria "Delivery" and subcriteria  "Price Level" "Price Behavior".
    But incase of delivery I am not getting any values. I checked for settings in confirguration but not able to trace why the delivery vendor evaluation is not happening.
    Pls advice on this.
    Regards,
    Venu

    Hi
    There are some settings like minimum delivery percentage which needs to be fulfilled for calculating score with respect to delivery performance.
    Check the PDF from the link, it gives you more details on how score is been calculated for each criteria and customizing settings
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Regards
    Raja

  • Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

    Hi,
    We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation.  I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these.  Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to? 
    Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
    Percentage
    Score
    0
    100
    10
    90
    20
    95
    100
    80
    200
    60
    300
    40.......
    When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are?  Or is there another way to look at it? 
    Thanks
    Beverly

    Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
    The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank  to 99.9  and your from -99.9 to blank
    this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
    the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
    You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
    From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
    and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week  each day corresponds to 20%

  • Vendor evaluation delivery rating

    hi,
    Presently working on vendor evaluation.
    i did config. but not getting proper result
    pl note the scenario; ifany body can help.
    a)On time delivery rating (ODR):- ODR is calculated to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
      Scoring Procedure:-
    ODR =1 if Goods receipt dateu2264 Specified delivery date
    ODR =0 if Goods receipt date>Specified delivery date
    b)     Quantity Rating (QNR):- QNR is calculated to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
    Scoring Procedure:-
    Quantity Rating Score (QNRS) = _Qty Received/Total qty to be delivered    *100
    QNRS                      QNR
    QNRSu2265100     1
    75u2264 QNRS <100     0.75
    50u2264 QNRS <75     0.50
    20u2264 QNRS <50     0.20
    0u2264 QNRS <20     0
    mainly problem is in spro-purchasingvendor evaluationdefine purchasing org data for vendor evaluation--pointscore
    if anybody can help
    regards

    Hi,
    Computing scores for DELIVERY, minimum delivery percentage and the standardizing value for delivery time variance are taken from the material master record(In purchasing value key) or from the fields : Minimum delivery qty. in percentage and Standard del. time variance fields in Txn: OMGL.
    1. You maintain minimum delivery percentage, if you do not want a vendor to receive a very good scoreif delivered goods on time, but not the exact qty.
    2. You maintain Standard del. time variance, to reate delivery dates variances in days.
    *% variance= (Difference between Statistical delivery date & GR Date)/Standard del. time variance 100.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Shilpa

  • Vendor evaluation delivery subcriteria's calculation verification - reg

    Dear Experts,
    In display vendor evaluation & Standard analysis we get to know the quantity reliability, on time delivery criterias individual scores but can anyone plz guide the tcode to verify the score calculation for delivery and quality criterias. Ontime delivery and quantity reliabiltiy verification mc$6, mc$8 respective tcodes values not satisfactory to us for analysis.
    (We have analyzed the Price criteria - "price level" factors by comparing info record/PO price history and effective price of vendors).
    Simillarly plz guide how to confirm scores that are getting calculated is correct or not for
    delivery criterias - quantity reliabililty, on time delivery.
    Plz solve this issue.
    full rewards assured.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Viju.

    Hi,
    I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Vendor Evaluation on Delivery

    Hi All,
    We have configured the vendor evaluation in our ECC 5.0 Dev system.
    We have Defined the main criteria, respective sub criteria s, weighting keys and also the purchase org level data.
    The weighting level is equal.
    The scoring methods have also been set such as:
    For Main Criteria Delivery,  Subcriterias such as On Time delivery, Quantity reliability, Adherence to confirmation date ...etc has been given the scoring methods.
    3 for On Time delivery
    2 for Quantity reliability
    B for Adherence to confirmation date.
    The point scores for these methods have also been set with scales such as
    for 5.0 %  score is 20
    for 20.0 %  score is 10
    for 50.0 %  score is 5
    for 99.9 %  score is 1
    In ME61 the vendor evaluation is created.
    We tried 2 scenarios.
    Scenario 1: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is done at a later date than mentioned in the PO as the delivery confirmation date.
    Scenario 2: Where the purchase order is created and the receipt is taken for a quantity which is less than the quantity ordered.
    When the vendor evaluation is carried out in ME61 Automatic New Evaluation or ME63 we get the result for only price and that too
    The score is 1.
    The weighting is 100%
    The overall score is 1
    My Doubt is why isn't there a calculation on the scores done for criteria 03 - Delivery ???
    It shows a score of 0. But the scenarios mentioned should have populated the score for Delivery, I presume.
    Please advice where I have gone wrong or what is that I have missed to configure.
    Regards
    Govind
    Edited by: Govind Ramesh on Aug 23, 2011 11:54 AM

    I can see that you are using a ZSAP update group , and think this is the root cause for all your problems.
    See OSS Note 397864 - Self-defined info structures purchasing similar to S013
    it explains:
    Therefore, you are not permitted
    a) to use info structure S013 as a template for self-defined info structures (This is prevented as of Release 4.5 due to a termination message).
    b) to create any update rules for S013 with a self-defined update group.
    c) to include the enhanced update rules that are used for S013 during the definition of key figure updating into the definition of the update of a self-defined info structure (compute...).
    Sorry for this late update, just saw that you found it yourself, I had the reply open but then went for a breakfast without sending.
    Edited by: Jürgen L. on Aug 24, 2011 9:55 AM

  • Vendor Evaluation Report as per the delivery date

    Dear Experts,
    Please guide how view reports for
    1. Varince of delivery date for goods recieved from the Vendor as per the delivery date in the PO.
    2. Variance of delivery date for goods recieved from the Vendor as per Standard Varinace %age defined in purchasing Value Key ?
    Regards,
    Vikas

    Hi Narendra,
    Thxs for quik response,
    I created Purchasing value key with Negative indicator like first reminder is -8.second is -4 and third is -2 and assigned the respetive material master and w r t material PO created.  When i am doing ME9F exceuting its showing error No suitable purchasing documents found,while i am exceucting  i select PO No,Purchase Org,application EF and message type MAHN but its shoing error ..kindly let me know how i can proceade.
    Please note, My client requirment is once PO delivery date falls with the reminder period its should remind vendor through mail,
    Regards
    Santosh

Maybe you are looking for

  • 10.8.5 constant freeze

    I have a lot of problems with my MBP 10.8.5 freezes very often. The consol shows a lot of problems and I do not know what to do to fix this and would so much appreciate help to fix this. After reading about the next generation OSX i decided to not do

  • Macbook Pro Running Slow and have NO Idea Why!

    For the last few days, my 10 month old Macbook Pro has been running really slowly. Sometimes, it is perfectly normal. But other times, it just is really slow. Typing will show up a few seconds later, it will take a few seconds to switch tabs in safar

  • I cant see old messages and calls when i use same ...

    please skype community help me.. i cant see conversations or incoming/outgoing calls when i use the same account on other phone.. please give me advice what to do..  thank you so much..

  • Problem with Today view in the Notifications Centre on iPhone 5

    I recently updated to iOS7 on my iPhone 5 and was configuring the notifications centre

  • Can I restore contacts from an earlier iCloud backup?

    Hi I hope someone can help me...! My son had contacts syncing via iCloud on his iPod so ended up with all the contacts from my iPhone.  At his request I removed all my work/social contacts, just leaving on his iPod the few for family members that he