Vendor Evaluation on QM notification type

Dear Experts,
Is it possible to add another type of QM notification in the vendor evaluation or only the F2 can be considerer?
We are thinking in getting another type of QM notification in the evaluation achievment.
Kind regards to all
Oliver F

Thanks...
If possible can you please explain , how the enhancement MM06L001 will overwrite the score with an example.
Rajesh

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation and inspection type 17

All,
Iam using EWM QIE as a result of which i have to use inspection type 17. Does Vendor Evaluation work with inspection type 17. I know for a fact that in standard ECC Vendor Evaluation works with the 01 inspection type, but i am not sure of inspection type 17. Any input will be appreciated.
Thanks

Dear Ramki,
Thanks for your input; if I don't use the user exit, then the quality score is being shown there for the material level.
But still, there are a few problems:
1. Material wise Quality score, which is being displayed in ME64, is not getting updating in any of the table. Table ELBM is also blank. There is not even a single record.
2. The quality rating that is being calculated here is as per following:
     The user gives disposition for the incoming material as
          Qty accepted directly: A1
          Qty accepted after segregation: A2
          Qty accepted as major deviation: A3
          Qty accepted as minor deviation: A4
          Qty Rejected.     : A5
The formula is
Q.R. = (A11 + A2(-0.5) + A30.5 + A4(0.8) +A5(-1) - Line Rej. qty(-1)) /
               Total No. of Qty Received.
Final Q.R. = Q.R. - Mix up complaints*10 - Genuine complaints * 5
Since the formula have subtraction(negative quality score) also, I don't think that this subtraction or negative score would be able to capture in FM for Quality score procedure and the notification qty will not be able to be calculated.
So, to get the quality rating as per above and getting the same for the material wise also.
After that i need to get one report for vendor wise material wise report at month period.
How should I proceed?
Thanks once again for your valuable input.
Thanks & Regards,
SUMIT GUPTA

PO Valuation Type for Vendor Evaluation

Dear Gurus
I want to ask, can the Vendor evaluation program in SAP check the Purch.Order up to Valuation type ?
So the VE program can differ the valuation type in Purchase order.
Any respond are highly regarded
Thanks and Best Regards
Christian
Edited by: C J Lee on Feb 1, 2011 6:38 AM

Hi Piyush,
Your answer is correct. Val type does not come from info record to MRP created PRs, even there is a fixed vendor in the PR, coming from source list.
But, this happens in the PO, that val type is an obligatory field, for a split valuated material.
In PR, it can only be maintained manually, I guess.

Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints

Hi,
I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
Thanks

Hi Shailendra,
I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
"I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
Thanks

Quality score and vendor evaluation?

Dear Sapient,
Can any one help me to know how quality score in QA11 or QA12 is hitting vendor evaluation programs?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Hi
Rejection/complaint : This comes from the Following calculation.
Only consider the Q2 type of notification score.
If no complaint then this is 100 otherwise following formula:
The complaints score is calculated from the number of complaints against the vendor, according to the following formula:
QSc = QScmin + (QScmax - QScmin) * (1 - (N * K) / (F * U))
QSc = QScmin if (N * K) > (F * U)
QScmin = Lower limit for QSc
QKZmax = Upper limit for QSc
N       = Number of Q-notifications in the applicability period
K       = Estimated nonconformity costs
F       = Share of business volume for QSc calculation
U       = Sales of the vendor in the applicability period
K is maintained at
QCC0>Quality notification->Information system--->Define NC cost for Vendor Evaluation
Audit:
The audit score is either the average quality score for the audits or is made up of the quality scores for the most recent audits. You can also enter an audit score manually.
This is 07 inspection type average score.
Again depend upon UD score of 07 inspection type.
I hope this will help
Regards
Sujit

Vendor Evaluation Report

Hi All,
We have a problem. The vendor evaluation report is not considering the rejections of goods and shows the quality as 100.
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VT

hi
for vendor evalution you have to do the necessary settings in MM and QM. then you have to carry out the transactions in MM and QM

Goods receipt sub critaria in vendor evaluation

In vendor evaluation there is one sub-critaria goods receipt under main critaria quality, in this how system calcutae the tax.
i went through the sap help doc, in this it is mentiaoned that
"When you run an automatic re-evaluation for a vendor, the system selects all the incoming inspection lots for the vendor that lie within the validity period and calculates the average of the scores. The result is the vendor's score for the quality of goods received."
i m not understand with this. plz specify in your words and where we maintain the validity period?

Hi,
In the sub-criteria Goods Receipt, system dows not calculate tax. In the main criteria of Quality, if your material is maintained for quality inspection type 01, then system creates inspection lots for GRN. The score of each inspection lot is calculated based on you settings (For example based on usage decision). The system then saves these scores of each inspection lot. These scores are then averaged out for all the inspection lots those lie within the validity periods.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Prashant

Vendor evaluation in purchase order (vendor unknown)

Hi!
I created 2 new evaluation criteria for vendor evaluation.
When i go to tcode ME25 "create PO vendor unknown", I assign the source of suplly and click on "vendor evaluation" my 2 new criterias do not appear in the "Ranking list of vendors".
Any ideas?
Regards.

I think the new vendor is having a different pricing schema than the old vendor. Check the pricing schema for the old vendor (in purchasing view in field 'Schema Group. vendor) and compare it to the new vendor. I think they're different.
If it is then what i think happening is the user already input the price for the condition type in pricing schema A, then the vendor is changed and the new pricing schema is kiciking in thus making the old condition type missing.
Try to either:
A. Change to the old vendor back,
B. Change the pricing schema of the new vendor to be the same with old vendor

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Discrepency in Vendor Evaluation Report

Hi All,
The vendor evaluation report does not consider the rejections and shows the quality as 100. Any suggestions on how to rectify the same?
Thanks

Hi All,
The client has not maintained any scores for quality. This may be the reason, or is it mandatory to have QM module to evaluate vendors based on quality??
Currently they receive goods into GR blocked stock first. If its fine, then they goods receipt it or else they return it using Mov Type 124. Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
VT

Vendor Evaluation(2LIS_02_S013)

Hello Friends
i have issue with 2lis_02_s013 vendor evaluation . issue is when i do full upload for this data source i can retrive around 12000 records and when i try to do intial upload the system gives me error
LIS updating is still activated (client 200 )M+     25
Errors in source system     RSM     340
so i am unable to intial load so i did intial load without any datatransfer . it works fine . it has transfered only one record . but when i do the delta upload it does not extarct any data it shows 0/0 records but the staus is green . when i see the details tab Processing (data packet): No data .i have already activated delta in the lbw1 . there i find only two options one asynchronous and noupdating i have selected . asynchronus. here do i need to fill any setup sepatretely for delta . so how can we delete the setup tables for 'S'types data sources. is that same as lbwq. plz let me know what need to be done inorder to fill the cube with delta upload . look forward to your valuble replays and points will be awareded .
Thankyou

Kumar,
     Fill up the setup tables for that extractor. Because the LO extraction only eorks on the the setup tables. And the setup tables are used when you do the delta.
Go to SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures ->
Initilization -> Delete the setup tables. Select your extractor and delete the setup tables for it..And...
SBIW -> Business Information Warehouse -> Logistics -> Managing Extract Structures -> Initilization -> Filling setup tables. Fill the corresponding setup tables for vendor evaluation.
Try checking the data in RSA3.
Hope this helps.....

Vendor evaluation reports

Hey Gurus,
During the pre-study for implementation of the vendor evaluation tool in R/3 my business team has asked for reports showing the data/orders behind the evaluations. If, for instance, a low score is computed for the u201COn-time deliveryu201D criterion they would like to know which orders/deliveries have caused this low score for a vendor.
They see a danger in contacting vendors with low scores and complaining/trying to negotiate better rates based on scores without being able to tell how the scores were calculated and which orders were u201Cbadu201D.
Hope you can help.
Thanks in advance.
K.R.
Dag

Hi,
Normally you can use the "Additional Info´s" functionality but
the function 'Additional Infos' is not available for all subcriterias.
Especially for the delivery criterias it is not possible, because there
is no more detailed information in the system about the score which is
already shown on vendor/material level.
The scores of delivery criterias are calculated for each GR but the
scores are not stored on this level in statistics. The scores are
stored on 'Inforecord-level' therefore there is no lower level
available in the protocol (no more detailed information about this
line).The function 'Detailed information' is only available for
criterias with type '4' pricelevel
                    '5' pricehistory
                    '7' Quality lot GR
                    '9' Quality lot audit
                    '1' semi-autom. Criterias.
So, you can not have this information in the standard.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Delivery rating in vendor evaluation

Can I know on what logic system calculates the delivery rating, for schedule agreement which has more than one schedule lines.
Regards,
M.M

Dear Magesh,
This is for On time delivery:
===========================================================
At the time of a goods receipt against a purchase order, the system checks whether the delivery was on time or late:
GR date - delivery date = date variance
If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity is to be taken into account.
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If no value exists, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If there no such value in this case either, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Minimum delivery percentage field is used. If no value exists, goods receipts of fractions of the order quantity are included in the calculation of the score.
If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery date adhered to, the variance is zero and the system awards the highest points score for the relevant goods receipt.
If the delivery is not on time, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
In the process, the system searches for the standardizing value as follows:
It checks the Minimum delivery quantity/standardizing value for delivery time variance from material indicator.
If the indicator has been selected, it checks whether a value has been maintained in the material master record.
If a value exists, it is used. If not, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value in this case either, one of the following values is used:
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
If the indicator has not been selected, the value from the Standardizing value for delivery time variance field is used. If there is no such value, one of the following values is used
in the case of goods receipts against scheduling agreement releases: the firm zone
in the case of goods receipts against purchase orders: the difference between the statistical delivery date and the order date
The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The new score is then included in the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor Date variance defined in Customizing.
When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendor's score for "On-Time Delivery Performance".
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and included in the existing score for on-time delivery performance for the vendor
Adherence to Conf. Date :
===========================================================
1. When a goods receipt is posted for an order item, the system checks whether open inbound deliveries exist for the order item, i.e. inbound deliveries for which no goods receipts have yet been recorded.
If open inbound deliveries exist, the system checks whether the date previously notified by the vendor has been adhered to or whether the goods receipt date differs from the date thus confirmed:
GR date - date confirmed by vendor in shipping notification = date variance
2. If the delivery was on time, the system checks whether a minimum delivery quantity has been defined in Customizing.
a. If you have not set a minimum delivery quantity, goods receipts representing partial deliveries will also be included in the calculation of the score.
b. If the minimum delivery quantity is not reached, the system does not determine a score for the goods receipt.
c. If the minimum delivery quantity is reached and the delivery is on time, the variance is zero. This means that the system awards the maximum score for the goods receipt.
3. If the delivery date is not in accordance with the notified one, the system calculates the date variance in days and converts it into a percentage variance.
4. The system then awards the score you defined in Customizing for this percentage variance.
5. The new score is then merged with the vendor's previous score for the subcriterion. To calculate the new score for the subcriterion from the already existing composite score and this new individual score, the system applies the smoothing factor On-time delivery performance/Timeliness of service provision (defined in Customizing for Vendor Evaluation under Purchasing organization data for Vendor Evaluation).
6. When you run a new evaluation, the system calculates the average of the individual scores for all materials. The result is the vendors score for adherence to the confirmation date.
If a goods receipt covers several schedule lines, MM Vendor Evaluation performs this calculation for each schedule line.
This results in more than one score for the single goods receipt. Each of these scores is multiplied by the quantity delivered against the relevant schedule line and is thus weighted by quantity.
The sum of the weighted points scores is divided by the total goods receipt quantity. The result is the score for this one goods receipt.
The score for the goods receipt is smoothed and merged with the existing score for adherence to the confirmation date for the vendor.
Regards,
w1n

Weighting Key in Vendor Evaluation

Hi all,
Is there any configuration by which the weighting key is defaulted?
My client uses only one weighting key and whenever a vendor evaluation is run, they want the weighting key to be autopopulated.
FYI
No customization. Is this possible only through normal SAP configuration?
Thanks

Generally last time used weighting key will defult to ME61 but if not then you can create screen variant using SHD0 transaction.
Go to SHD0 adn type tcode ME61 and in tran variant type e.g. ZME61
and then hit create button
go through the transaction, every step popup will come
here just enter
and when you see the weighting key popup screen here check the w. content and output only check box (the value of weighting key should be populated)
then hit exit and save
it will ask object
enter the object and save
then from main screen
hit GOTO from header and click on create variant transaction and enter the variant transction code
e.g. ZME61 and save
give this to user
systen will defualt the weighting key
reward the points

Delete score in vendor evaluation

Hi, everyone!
How can i delete vendor evaluation score for delivery?
After make evaluation, I delete a good reciept document (cancellation), so now I don't have movement document for this vendor.
If i make new vendor evaluation old score doesn"t change.
Thanks

Hi,
GO to Spro--->Material Management -> Purchasing-->Vendor evaluation ->define criterial>01 quality--> subcriteria ->03 Audit---> Scoring method -
>07 automatic determination from system audit.
but for that please create the inspection lot with 07 inspection type and do the UD .
with regards
Yashodhan

Vendor Evaluation on QM notification type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for