Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores

Dear Gurus,
On what basis are the scores assigned for the percentage that is assigned. For Eg. what do you mean by the following:
Percentage   Score
20.0-        10
10.0-        65
2.0-       100
2.0        100
10.0         50
what does 20.0- mean and how is a score of 10 assigned to the same.same is the case for all the entries.
Kindly explain me the entire process as to what does this percentage mean. Assume that we are evaluating the vendor based on Price.

Hi,
The system calculates the scores for vendor evaluation as follows.
Calculating the Overall Score
The system derives the overall score from the scores for the various main criteria, taking the
weighting factors assigned by Purchasing in the system settings for each main criterion into
account.
The following example explains this process:
Example
The table below shows the scores for a vendor and their weighting factors:
Main criterion Score Weighting factor
Price 70 40
Quality 85 25
Delivery 50 10
General service/support 50 5
Converting Weighting Factors into Percentages
To make the weighting factors clearer to the user, the system converts them into percentages.
1. The system adds the factors together and equates the total with 100 %:
40 + 25 + 10 + 5 = 80 equals 100 %
2. To express the individual weighting factors as percentages of 100%, the system first divides
100% by the sum of the weighting factors:
100 / 80 = 1.25 %
3. Then the system multiplies the weighting factors the buyer assigned to the main criteria by
this figure:
40 x 1.25 = 50.00 %
25 x 1.25 = 31.25 %
10 x 1.25 = 12.50 %
5 x 1.25 = 6.25 %
4. The following are the results of percentage of overall score
Main criterion Score Percentage of overall score
Price 70 50.00 %
Quality 85 31.25 %
Delivery 50 12.50 %
General service/support 50 6.25 %
However, internally, the system uses the weighting factors to compute the overall score.
1. The scores for the main criteria are multiplied by their weighting factors.
70 x 40 = 2800 points
85 x 25 = 2125 points
50 x 10 = 500 points
50 x 5 = 250 points
2. Total points = 5675.
3. This total is divided by the sum of the weighting factors:
5675 / 80 = 70.94 points
The vendor is awarded an overall score of 71 points
Please go though this link for clear understanding.
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Regards,
Manik

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Dear Gurus,
Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
Follow the bellow steps:
1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
Select.Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5. ME61
With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Regards,

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

Dear Team,
Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
Thanks & Regards
Nireesh

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathy

hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish

Vendor Evaluation through ME63

Hi all,
Kindly give me the configuration steps for Vendor Evaluation. The specific requirement is
only for two main criteria 1. Quantity - subcriteria GR/IR inspection & Rejection/Complaint
2. Delivery - subcriteria Ontime Delivery & Quantity Reliability.
During evaluation, the score of the vendor should be calculated as 50% of Quality Score + 50 % of Delivery score.
Warm Regards,
Sadashivan

Hi,
Check below links...
Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
Edited by: Julfikar Ali on Apr 13, 2009 1:30 PM

Vendor Evaluation tab not coming in Service Entry sheet.

Please guide me to get the vendor eval tab in Service entry sheet creation and also provide the what are the transaction code to be used.
How to run the back ground job.
In Vendor evaluation each and every vendor need to be maintained the scores?
Regards,
Hanuman.

Hi,
T.code: ML81N below mentioned tabs are coming.
1. Basic Data
2. Accept data
3. Value
4. Long txt.
5. History.
Vendor Evaluation tab not coming
Regards,
Hanuman

Vendor Evaluation steps

Hi,
We are using ECC 6.0 with single purchasing organisation.
Can anybody send the steps to configure Vendor Evaluation settings and report.
regards,

Hi
Kindly refer the link for detailed vendor evaluation.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Thanks

Vendor evaluation - Automatic new evaluation

Hi,
Vendor evaluation is maintained. But it does not get updated automatically after GR. We have to update them one by one (ME61/ME63). Is there a way to automatically revaluate multiple vendors at the same time.
Regards,
Pratap

Hello,
If you want to evaluate vendors on a large scale, the system offers standard analysis to meet with your needs. They are transactions ME6B, ME6C, and ME6D. YOU can access these transactions via the front-end SAP menu Logistics>MM>Purchasing>Master Data>Vendor Evaluation>List Displays. For details about these standard analysis
report, you can read the online documentation at SAP Liabrary>Logistics>MM>Information System>MM Vendor Evaluation>Reports and Analyses in Vendor Evaluation.
What data will be taken into account in vendor evaluation is defined by the applicability period (period in calendar days) in IMG Customizing >MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation. Note: The applicability period is not taken into account with respect to all vendor evaluation criteria. It is therefore not designed to restrict the period to a certain year.
Example:
If you enter the value 150 here, the system will take into account data from the past 150 days for vendor evaluation purposes. Data that is more than 150 days old will not be included in the evaluation process.
Next, after a configuration change, you will have to rebuild table S013 to get data before the configuration into vendor evaluation with transaction OLI3. I have attached note 64636 which describes the process of rebuilding your statistics.
Regards,

ME6H : point score for vendor evaluation

Dear guru ,
In vendor evaluation analysis for on-time delivery performance
I can see fields point score 1 and point score 2.
Can you explain me which is the difference between these two fields ?
Thanks in advance.

HI,
ON TIME DEL 1-it is for a specific period(day,month,yr)
ON TIME DEL 1-cumilative value

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Quality score and vendor evaluation?

Dear Sapient,
Can any one help me to know how quality score in QA11 or QA12 is hitting vendor evaluation programs?
Regards,
Kaushal Rai

Hi
Rejection/complaint : This comes from the Following calculation.
Only consider the Q2 type of notification score.
If no complaint then this is 100 otherwise following formula:
The complaints score is calculated from the number of complaints against the vendor, according to the following formula:
QSc = QScmin + (QScmax - QScmin) * (1 - (N * K) / (F * U))
QSc = QScmin if (N * K) > (F * U)
QScmin = Lower limit for QSc
QKZmax = Upper limit for QSc
N       = Number of Q-notifications in the applicability period
K       = Estimated nonconformity costs
F       = Share of business volume for QSc calculation
U       = Sales of the vendor in the applicability period
K is maintained at
QCC0>Quality notification->Information system--->Define NC cost for Vendor Evaluation
Audit:
The audit score is either the average quality score for the audits or is made up of the quality scores for the most recent audits. You can also enter an audit score manually.
This is 07 inspection type average score.
Again depend upon UD score of 07 inspection type.
I hope this will help
Regards
Sujit

Vendor Evaluation Message ML037 "Minimum Point Score is 1"

Dear Gurus
Where is the settings/configuration for vendor evaluation message, on SAP customizing (SPRO)
Any comments are highly appreciated
Thank You
CJ

this is a hardcoded message, which canot be custmized. correct your customizing and follow the rules given by SAP.

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation data in tables ELBM and ELBP

Hello,
Please can someone provide some direction for this issue we have with MM Vendor Evaluation in ECC5.0.
Basically, I have set up SAP standard Vend Evaluation config for our companies Purchase Orgs in SPRO, however, tables ELBM, and ELBP are not storing any values. The config that I have maintained includes:
-     Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J : set to equal weightings
-     Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G: left as standard
-     Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M: left as standard
-     Define Purchasing Organization data: left as standard but no Subcriterion maintained. Weightings set as equal weightings. Points scores also left as standard/
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Dave
FL,USA.

Once you do all the config than you have to use ME61 than use ME6H transaction.

Vendor Evaluation-- Points and Scores

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for