Vendor Evaluation related

Hi Experts
During vendor evaluation which program gets hit. particularly delivery date related. In the selection criteria the proposed delivery date is from PO creation date say if 5 days is the lead time, the PO creation date is 10.11.08 ,po release date is 11.11.08 and proposed delivery date is 15.10.08 and if the reciept date is 16.10.08 the delay is 1 day.
In my scenerio the system should consider po release date as the start date and not the po creation date.
Which tables get effected and which tables I have to change
Regards

Hi SAPMAN, the system uses the SIL for its calculation.
In case you need to extend the timeline you could use the Statistics-Relevant Delivery Date in Delivery Schedule tab, so the vendor wont get a bad scor due to your internal delay.
Regards.
Willy.

Similar Messages

FM creation for vendor evaluation data

Hai,
    In my function module I need to get vendor evaluation data. To do this from where I can get the details, r there any tables for this, could u suggest something for this, actually I'm new for this MM. Eventhough if there r any tables, before writing FM r there any settings to be done for this.
            I know in ME61 we can get these details, but to write RFC how to proceed.
                                   Thank you
                                 Regards
                                  Srinivas

hi
check
ELBK, ELBN, ELBP u2013 Vendor Evaluation Related Data
ELBM ( Vendor Evaluation: Material-Related Item)
S013
regards
kunal

Query related to vendor evaluation

Hi Experts,
I want to start evaluating some of my suppliers.
Specifically, I would like to evaluate suppliers for 1) on-time delivery 2) did they send the Certificate of Analysis as requested.
How can i achieve this in system
What transaction is the best for this?
How exactly do I run it (choices to make, etc)?
Where is the COA information available ?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prakash

Dear all
You can do vendor evaluation by 3 ways
1.Automatic--Pre-requisite master data
2.Semi-automatic--Pre-requisite master data
3.Manual- No need of master data
You need to do some configuration before doing vendor evaluation,
Ven eval. can be done only at pur.Org level.
You can set your own criteria for Ven eval
Standard criteria in SAP is Price,Quality,Delivery & service.
Do you want to know further let me know
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Problem related to Vendor Evaluation?

Hi All,
I want to give weightage of 50: 30:20 for quality / delivery / serviceu2026. but I am not getting How Do I do That. Please Help

you can do that in SPRO go to material management then purchasing then vendor evaluation then define weithing keys.
regards,
qsm sap

Vendor evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE

We require Vendor Evalution report in SAP BUSINESS ONE which has information about receipt(GRPO) perfomance against purchase order issued. We require item code, item description, p.o.no., p.o.qty, delivery date, GRPO NO., GRPO Date, GRPO QTY, Delay no. of days. If there is any report in SAP please inform us. Otherwise any query we can make please inform us how to make query in SAP business one.

Hi,
The query from the thread is modified as below to include the customer/vendor name :
SELECT T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode, SUM(T0.Quantity) 'PO Qty',SUM(T1.Quantity) 'GRPO Qty', SUM(T2.Quantity) 'Return Qty'
FROM dbo.POR1 T0
LEFT JOIN dbo.PDN1 T1
ON T0.DocEntry = T1.BaseEntry AND T0.LineNum = T1.BaseLine
LEFT JOIN dbo.RPD1 T2
ON T1.DocEntry = T2.BaseEntry AND T1.LineNum = T2.BaseLine
INNER JOIN dbo.OPDN T3
ON T1.DocEntry = T3.docentry
WHERE T0.ItemCode is not NULL AND T0.DocDate >= [%0] AND T0.DocDate <= [%1]
GROUP BY T3.cardcode, T0.ItemCode
Check if this helps.
Please make sure you have a look on the Query Generator and the related books on the SQL query writing before you start creating your own.
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

MATERIAL & VENDOR EVALUTION

CAN ANY BODY DONE MATERIAL & VENDOR EVALUTION LIKE MY SCENARIO IS I CONFIGURED 3 SELECTED AS A ACCEPTED ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION AND ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY AND REJECTED I DONE QUALITY SCORE ACCEPTED 100 ACCEPTED CERTAIN DEVIATION 70 ACCEPTED DEVIATION WITH PENALTY 30 REJECTED 1
IN CONFIGURATION DEFINITION OF QUALITY SCORE CLASS LIMIT I ALSO CONFIGURED BUT WHAT IS THE MEAN OF EXPONENTIAL AND EQUIDISTANT IF I ASSIGN MY QUALITY SCORE USAGE INDICATOR ANYTHING WILL HAPPEN OR WE CAN AND I ALSO TRIED ASSIGNED QUALITY SCORE CLASSES FOR INFO STRUCTURE SYSTEM NOT ALLOWED
FINALLY HOW I WILL ASSIGN MY QUALITY SCORE TO MATERIAL ANALYSIS AND VENDOR ANALYSIS KINDLY GUIDE ME IF ANY BODY DONE THIS SCENARIO.

I hope you would have wrote it readable & formatted in good sentence...........
Nevertheless.......
As per SAP std settings....................
Both uniform and exponentially weighted classifications are predefined in the standard system. The uniform classification is proposed as the default.
Equidistant is uniform one ...uni formally increasing where as Exponential score is exponentially which is predefined.
Now Its only "statistics" & not "Evaluation" info structure you can assign here............
Warning: You cannot change classifications that have already been used! First, you must delete the data contents in the related information structures. You can then change the classification. Finally, you must update the information structures to provide them with data entries, provided that the original documents have not already been archived.

Vendor Evaluation formula

Dear All,
Kindly give me the vendor evaluation formula.
I have configured the vendor evaluation with the following weighting factors:
Price : 30%
Quality: 50%
Delivery : 20%
i want to know how it is calculating internally in SAP .i want the formula for thes
Regards
Kumar.

Hi,
please go through the following link. there is a document given by SAP.
COIN error during MB1A transaction code
this document explains all the formulae you are asking.
agian there are many threads which discuss about the various problems faced in this functionality and there you may find the explainations related to it with the formulaes.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time del

hi
We have following requirement related to Vendor evaluation - main criterion : Delivery ; Sub criterion : On time delivery
The requirement is:
Deliveries late by 7 days should be considered as on time.
pl suggest

Hi Chintu,
Thanks for ur reply.
scores i have configured for qty.variance as,
2     Qty. reliability                      100
2     Qty. reliability     5.0-              90
2     Qty. reliability     10.0-      80
2     Qty. reliability     20.0-      75
2     Qty. reliability     40.0-      50
2     Qty. reliability     50.0-      40
2     Qty. reliability     75.0-      20
2     Qty. reliability     80.0-        1
My dought is, For on on-time delivery we are not maintaining any smoothing factor right?
So, Which smoothing factor we should consider for on-time delivery?
I have maintained smoothing factor for
Timeliness service - .20
Quantity Reliability - .30
Shipping Instructions - .25.
Thanks in Advance.
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 4:43 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Nov 19, 2009 8:25 AM
Edited by: SAPr3.HELP on Dec 1, 2009 6:30 AM

Vendor evaluation tab not appearing in ML81N

Hi,
Vendor evaluation tab not appearing in ML81N.
Please suggest

Hello,
Please maintain vendor evaluation for related purchasing organization. Afterwards, vendor evaluation tab will be appeared in ML81N.
Thanks.
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation with QM - Tables

Hello
Can any one help the table information such us vendor evaluation main criteria and sub-criteria. Information stored in the audit lot , rejections and complaints etc. Please i am looking for only Vendor Evaluation with QM - related Tables information only .
Thanks for your help
Nic

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation in ML81N

Dear Gurus
I need to maintain some additional sub criteria for External Services, since sap standard has only 2 Sub criteria, in ML81N the vendor evaluation TAB Appears over there.
My problem is, I can add the additional sub criteria as business requirement, but in ML81N its not appearing for Manual Input, only SAP Standard 2 Sub criteria appears over there, not other additional sub criteria.
How to make appear the additonal sub criteria in ML81n transcation>>Vendor evaluation tab???
Please advise me on this. Your help is most appreciated
Thanks
RS
Edited by: RS on Apr 27, 2009 3:18 PM

Hello,
Please maintain vendor evaluation for related purchasing organization. Afterwards, vendor evaluation tab will be appeared in ML81N.
Thanks.
Regards,

Vendor Evaluation using Material Group

Dear all
Kindly let me know whether Vendor evalation is possible using material Group.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Dear all
What I mean to say it, we do not have follwoing master in our company.
Material master, Vendor master & Pur.Info records,I did not know what configuration has been there in PRD server,But once we gave Authorization to our user regarding Vendor Report, they are getting the Vendor evaluated automatically,So I thought It is taking the material Group as a reference for Evaluation,That why i requesting your guy how we can do configuration in related to Vendor Evaluation.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Vendor Evalution - Vendor Class

Hi
1. What is the exact purpose of Vendor class ? How it can be used in Vendor Evaluation and other areas ?
2. Can we group some Vendors in to a Vendor class so that we can assign the Weighting key to the Vendor Class instead of Vendor by Vendor in Vendor Evalution.
Thanks
Maruthi

Hi Experts
Any related answers or related research.??
Any documentation or related links in SAP Help ?
Regards
Maruthi Ram

Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

Hi,
We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation. I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these. Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to?
Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
Percentage
Score
0
100
10
90
20
95
100
80
200
60
300
40.......
When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are? Or is there another way to look at it?
Thanks
Beverly

Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank to 99.9 and your from -99.9 to blank
this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week each day corresponds to 20%

Vendor Evaluation related

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for