Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

Dear Experts,
I have mention below % and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
-          100     On-time del.
1,0       90     On-time del.
2,0         95     On-time del.
10,0         80     On-time del.
20,0         60     On-time del.
30,0         40     On-time del.
40,0         20     On-time del.
50,         5     On-time del.
99,9           1     On-time del.
-5,0            95     On-time del.
-10,0     65     On-time del.
-20,0     75     On-time del.
-30,0     60     On-time del.
-40,0     40     On-time del.
-50,0     20     On-time del.
-60,0     5     On-time del.
-99,9     1     On-time del.
Thanks,

Hi Shyam,
I am also looking for the same.
can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic, Fully Automatic Evaluation. what is the difference.
what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
Regards,
Anthyodaya.

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation Scoring methods E & F

Dear Folks,
In the vendor evaluation, I see two scoring methods:
E Determination of Price Variance from Invoice Documents
F Determination of Quantity Variance from Invoice Documents
Can anyone advice me how these two scoring methods works?
For example, the method E, price variance from invoice documents. What does it means? It's the price variance from invoice documents against what? Is it against the PO price?
And for method F, what's the quantity variance compared against? GR quantity or PO quantity?
Best Regards
Junwen

Hi,
In case of scoring method E, the price variance in invoice is with reference to the price mentioned in PO. In customization, you maintain the score for each percentage or a range of percentage variance. System calculates variance from price entered in Invoice with reference to the PO & then assigns the score from the values entered in Customization.
In case of scoring menthod F, Quantity Variance is with reference to the quantity in GRN. In this case you enter the score in customization for the variance. System calculates the variance from the quantity entered in Invoice & the GRN quantity & assigns the score you maintained in Customization.
Hope this is clear.
Regards,
Prashant

Vendor Evaluation Price Level For services

Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
Thanks !!

Hi,
Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items

Hi experts,
Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
Anybody face such issue before?
Plz provide your inputs..thanks!

Hi.
You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning). Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
regards,
Shashidar

Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

Hi,
I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
Thanks & Regards,
Charudatta

Hi,
Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Vendor Evaluation - Underdelivery Tolerance for Qty. reliability Criteria

Hi experts.
When using Underdelivery tolerance in a PO, the Evalation criteria Qty. reliability is not taking into account this tolerance and give a vendor a score based on the requested qty.
It doesn't make any sense to me, since I'm allowing the vendor to deliver up to this tolerance.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi,
When calculating score for quantity reliability, the Minimum delivery quantity % mentioned in customizing (Txn OMGL) is only taken into account, so that if the delivered quantity is below this then the score for the vendor will not be calculated.
The underdelivery tolerance is not checked. This is the standard functionality.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

QM Settings for Vendor Evaluation

Hi All,
I am having a small issue with QM settings in Vendor Evaluation.
Actual Scenario - My client makes use of "Weighted Charateristics" instead of "Usage Decisions" and decides whether the material can be used or rejected etc at the time of Quality Inspection.
And, i believe that whatever the score or decision regarding the material was observed, it will be stored in a file with scores.
Now, the problem is Automatic Vendor Evaluation is simply giving a single score of 82 for whatever decision they make. Please try to address my following queries
1) Where the person responsible in QM needs to maintain the actual file with scores so that Vendor Evaluation can pick those scores for calculation?
2) Is there any configuration involved in either QM or Vendor Evaluation?
I came to know that all the configuration on the Vendor Evaluation side is OK
Thanks

In the MM side for QM criteria you have to make automatic only than rest will take by the QM module
see below
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Vendor Evaluation - Price history

Hi
In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
Regards

to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation with QM - Tables

Hello
Can any one help the table information such us vendor evaluation main criteria and sub-criteria. Information stored in the audit lot , rejections and complaints etc. Please i am looking for only Vendor Evaluation with QM - related Tables information only .
Thanks for your help
Nic

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor evaluation - Price level

Hi,
pls can anybody help me to explain procedure how system calculating the sub criteria PRICE LEVEL, PRICE HISTORY , ONTIME DELIVERY,QTY RELIABILITY (Under main criteria PRICE,DELIVERY) in vendor evaluation process.
Possible give sample calculation.
Aparji

Price Level
This subcriterion compares relationship of a vendor's price to the market price. If the vendor's price is lower than the market price, he/she receives a good score; if it is higher than the market price he/she is assigned a poor score.
On the basis of the subcriterion "Price Level" you can compare a vendor's price to the current market price at a certain point in time.
Price History
This subcriterion compares the development of the vendor's price with the market price.
On the basis of the subcriterion "Price History", you can determine whether the vendor's price has increased or decreased over a certain period in comparison with changes in the market price over the same period.
Goods Receipt
This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality of the material that the vendor delivers. Quality inspection takes place at the time of goods receipt.
Quality Audit
This subcriterion is used to evaluate the quality assurance system used by a company in manufacturing products.
Complaints/Rejection Level
This subcriterion is used to evaluate whether the materials delivered by the vendor are regularly found to be faulty subsequent to incoming inspection (for example, on the shop-floor) leading to additional expense and loss of time (due to loss of production, reworking etc.).
The score (QM key quality figure) is calculated in QM Quality Management and the data passed on to MM Vendor Evaluation. This key quality figure is converted for use in the Vendor Evaluation scoring system.
On-Time Delivery Performance
This subcriterion is used to determine how precisely a vendor has adhered to the specified delivery dates.
Quantity Reliability
This subcriterion is used to determine whether a vendor has delivered the quantity specified in the purchase order.
"On-Time Delivery Performance" and "Quantity Reliability" always have to be seen in conjunction. You can specify for each material (in the material master record) or for all materials (in the system settings) the minimum quantity of the ordered materials that must be delivered in order for a goods receipt to be included in the evaluation. This enables you to avoid a situation in which a punctual goods receipt involving only a small quantity of ordered materials is included in the evaluation with a good score for "On-Time Delivery Performance". If this minimum quantity is not delivered, the vendor is not awarded a score. However, in this case the vendor

Weight Key in Vendor Evaluation

Hi all,
How the Weighting key in Vendor Evaluation is updating for Each Vendor?
If it is automatically Updating why ME6E is required?
regardds
Gibi Philip

hi,
Weighting Keys
A weighting key is an identifier under which the weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved.
If you know that you will want to carry out an evaluation repeatedly with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The system then automatically sets all the weighting factors.
There are two possible types of weighting key in the standard system:
Key 01
Key 02
Key 01 permits the equal weighting of all criteria.
Key 02 enables you to evaluate vendors supplying small parts, for example.
The weighting factors under this key are distributed as follows:
Price 5
Quality 3
Delivery 2
Gen. service/support 1
External service provision 2
Hope it explains you the importance ...
Regards
Priyanka.P
AWARD IF HELPFULL

Tracing Vendor Evaluation Data

Hi friends,
I want to trace detail of Vendor Evaluation results. For example for a one vendor evaluation we used 5 different control party result. I would like to see this 5 value. Is it poosible? How?
Thanks, have a nice day

Thank you for your reply. Of course checked ME65. For example.
Vendor valuated for 120 days. Purchased raw material with 4 different order. Created 6 different control party. Now when I check the evaluation report at ME65.
X Vendor
Purchasing score %100
Quality score %75
@detail.
Quality score %75. Which control parties created for this score? How can I understand??

Unsupplied vendors shouldnt consider during vendor evaluation

Dear Gurus,
At present during vendor evaluation system considering all vendors including un supplied for a period of time. the requirement is how , and where to exclude the unsupplied vendors, during the vendor evaluation , please share with full details im fresher in sap mm.

Do you have an evidence that the vendor evaluation calculated scores for a vendor who had not any transaction?

Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for