Vendor Evaluation steps

Hi,
We are using ECC 6.0 with single purchasing organisation.
Can anybody send the steps to configure Vendor Evaluation settings and report.
regards,

Hi
Kindly refer the link for detailed vendor evaluation.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • Looking for Vendor evaluation steps

    HI All.
    Looking for venfor evaluation steps in sequence.
    Regards.
    Parameshwar
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jul 5, 2011 7:51 AM

    May be of help
    [Vendor evaluation]
    [Vendor evaluation]
    [Re: vendor evaluation]
    Edited by: Karthik on Jul 5, 2011 1:28 PM

  • Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

    Please can any one update on it.
    Dear Friends.
    I have configured vendor evaluation in following  way .
    1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
                   Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense  that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    Regards,
    MAhesh
    Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

    Hi Mahesh,
    the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
    also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
    Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
    Vendor Evaluation Process
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Steps for VEndor Evaluation

    Hi friends,
    Can you give me some idea about vendor evaluation ,its purpose ,steps from config to maitain ..report..
    Thanks,
    Dharmveer

    Hi,
    Check following links
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/be/09283486c9ac42a20156c345f2a3fc/content.htm
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Thanks and Regards,
    Pritish
    Edited by: Pritish Naik on Jul 15, 2009 6:56 AM
    Edited by: Pritish Naik on Jul 15, 2009 7:00 AM

  • Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Dear Gurus,
    Pls explain me Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation is the process of analyzing and assessing the performance of the external vendors. In this processes vendors are allowed to score in different criteria and the highest points scored by vendor is selected for procurement.
    Follow the bellow steps:
    1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
    Select…………….Equal Weighting or Unequal Weighting
    2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
    Price,
    Quality,
    Delivery,
    Service
    For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
    Criteria Sub-Criteria
    Price, 1.Market Price,2. Price List
    Quality, 1.Goods receipt,2.Quality Audit
    Delivery 1.On time deliver,2. Confirmation, 3.Shipment Intructions
    Service 1. Innovative, 2. Flexibility
    3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
    4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
    5. ME61
    With above, you need to explore urself and read SAP help files.
    Note: Follow the below link and check saphelp file
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Regards,

  • Regarding vendor evaluation

    Hello Gurus,
    Can any one tell me about the vendor evaluation.
    What is the transaction code for vendor evaluation?
    Reg/ Shankar G

    Hi shankar,
    please go through this: step by step guide
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Please check whether you concidered all these points in your configuration
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97dda414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97f3e414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
    Regards,
    Hareesha

  • Vendor Evaluation (End-User process)

    which are the end user transaction code for the activity involved in the Vendor Evaluation?
    I need the Steps considering the creation of Purchase requisition till the report of Vendor evaluation.
    **Urgent**
    Regards
    Sandeep

    Hi Sandeep,
    I just have heard abt the process which i would like to share with u...
    the process goes like this
    PR ==> RFQ ==> Quotation ==> price comparison
    Guru's if I'm wrong please correct me. Even i would like to know the transaction code involved in this...
    anything left by my side pls do correct me.
    regards
    namrati

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • Help...Vendor Evaluation Websurvey not showing

    Dear All,
    Im facing a problem in Vendor evaluation. I've done the following steps:
    1. Create Questionnaire and assign it to Survey
    2. Define Event for survey
    3. Activate SRM_VE_SERVICE and UWS_FORM_SERVICE in SICF
    When I create confirmation for PO, the survey page should appear automatically so I can fill the questionnaire. But it only show a blank page. Does anyone has ever experienced the same problem?
    Rgds,
    Aleluya.

    Hi Aleluya ,
    you nee to perform this config steps
    1.To create surveys and questionnaires, make the necessary settings in Customizing for Supplier
    Relationship Management (SRM) under SRM Server Integration with Other mySAP Components
    Data Transfer to the SAP Business Information Warehouse Settings for Application-Specific DataSources (SRM)
    Web Survey Cockpit for SRM Supplier Evaluation .
    or you can use  this tcode  BBP_EVAL_SURVEY
    2. To create a Web survey, choose Survey Create from the menu. The name and the identifier
    can be chosen freely. The survey credentials are not used for calling up the questionnaire later on,
    but are helpful for categorizing the different questionnaires.
    3. After having saved a survey for the first time, you can add a new target group for mass data to its
    target group hierarchy. No additional user information (e-mail, user) is needed here, because user
    information is added to the questionnaire at runtime.
    4. To create a questionnaire, choose the Questionnaire pushbutton.
    Note
    Thanks & Regards
    Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

  • Weighting Key in Vendor Evaluation

    Hi all,
    Is there any configuration by which the weighting key is defaulted?
    My client uses only one weighting key and whenever a vendor evaluation is run, they want the weighting key to be autopopulated.
    FYI
    No customization. Is this possible only through normal SAP configuration?
    Thanks

    Generally last time used weighting key will defult to ME61 but if not then you can create screen variant using SHD0 transaction.
    Go to SHD0 adn type tcode ME61 and in tran variant type e.g. ZME61
    and then hit create button
    go through the transaction, every step popup will come
    here just enter
    and when you see the weighting key popup screen here check the w. content and output only check box (the value of weighting key should be populated)
    then hit exit and save
    it will ask object
    enter the object and save
    then from main screen
    hit GOTO from header and click on create variant transaction and enter the variant transction code
    e.g. ZME61 and save
    give this to user
    systen will defualt the weighting key
    reward the points

  • Vendor Evaluation error

    Hi,
    During maintaining a vendor evaluation, I am getting the following error message:
    "System settings for purchasing org 0001 incomplete".
    I've maintained the following settings in Customizing:
    1) Define weighting keys
    2) Define criteria
    3) Define scope list
    4) Maintaining Purchasing Organization Data
    Are there any other settings to be made somewhere?
    Thanks for your help.

    This is becuause some customising is not  complete in 4)Maintaining Pur org data. Please go thro each step  1) Main creteria 2) Sub createria for each main creteria 3) Weighing key assignments ...
    Regards
    Mani

  • Vendor Evaluation in MM

    Hi All
    Can u tell me the Detail  process of Vendor Evaluation in MM
    Regards
    Manju

    HI,
    Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
    Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
    weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
    Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
    Price 1 5
    Quality 1 5
    Delivery 1 2
    Gen. service/support 1 1
    Ext. service provision 1 2
    Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
    In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
    specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
    automatically.
    You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
    form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
    Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
    Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
    An example :-
    How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
    "On-Time Delivery Performance"?
    The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
    (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
    You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
    will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
    delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
    September 15.
    In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
    the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
    effect on the score for this goods receipt.
    However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
    which the vendor will actually adhere to.
    The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
    into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
    are the movement types 101 and 105.
    Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
    but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
    in Customizing.
    Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
    time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
    not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
    that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
    bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
    for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
    conjunction with quantity reliability.
    Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
    To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
    If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
    high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
    low percentage variance:
    The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
    the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
    The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
    12 / 20 x 100 = 60
    If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
    (12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
    If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
    the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
    statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    You can also refer http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97e4f414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    Thanks & Regards,
    Kiran

  • Vendor Evaluation during Service entry sheet

    Dear all,
    I would like to know, which place in Service entry sheet, the score are entered for vendor evaluation and also please guide me how to run vendor evaluation back ground, by steps
    Thanks for your help and appreciated if you can help me immediate
    Regar

    1. Execute ME6G transaction
    2. Click Step icon or Edit>>Step or Press F6
    Click Goto>>Variant if variant exist or Click Maintain Variant (if variant dont exist)
    Select the variant and follow from Step 3 Given below
    If you dont want to maintain variant
    1. Execute ME6G
    2. Click Start Condition
           Click Immediate button or maintain date/Time
    3. click Check and Save
    4. Save the Transaction
    5. Go to SM37 Transaction
    6. Enter the selection parameter (Check all the checkbox in selection indicator)
    7. Check Check box Near the Job
    8. Click Spool
    9. Check Spool No check box
    10 Click ABAP List In Type Colomn
    11. Spool request display will be there

  • Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented)

    Hi
    Can I have more input on Vendor Evaluation process (with QM module not implemented)  please ?

    Hi,
    Vendor evaluation can be automatic, manually or semi automatic. It is done on 4 criteria;
    1.     Price
    2.     Quantity
    3.     Delivery
    4.     Service 
    VE is done at p.org level, the Maximum no. of criteria that can be used are up to 99.
    IT is done in 4 steps:-
    1.     Define Weighing keys( equal weighing for all criteria or unequal weighing )
    2.     Define criteria
    3.     Define Scope of list
    4.     Define Pur. Org data for vendor.
    5.     
    SPRO—MM—PURCHASING --- VENDOR EVALUATION 
    ME61 Maintain vendor evaluation (Put p.org and vendor)
    Then ME65 Ranking list of vendor….
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Vendor Evaluation through ME63

    Hi all,
    Kindly give me the configuration steps for Vendor Evaluation.  The specific requirement is
    only for two main criteria  1. Quantity - subcriteria  GR/IR inspection & Rejection/Complaint
    2. Delivery - subcriteria Ontime Delivery & Quantity Reliability.
    During evaluation,  the score of the vendor should be calculated as 50% of Quality Score + 50 % of Delivery score.
    Warm Regards,
    Sadashivan

    Hi,
    Check below links...
    Vendor Evaluation Configuration and steps?
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
    Edited by: Julfikar Ali on Apr 13, 2009 1:30 PM

Maybe you are looking for