Vendor Evaluation - Underdelivery Tolerance for Qty. reliability Criteria

Hi experts.
When using Underdelivery tolerance in a PO, the Evalation criteria Qty. reliability is not taking into account this tolerance and give a vendor a score based on the requested qty.
It doesn't make any sense to me, since I'm allowing the vendor to deliver up to this tolerance.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi,
When calculating score for quantity reliability, the Minimum delivery quantity % mentioned in customizing (Txn OMGL) is only taken into account, so that if the delivered quantity is below this then the score for the vendor will not be calculated.
The underdelivery tolerance is not checked. This is the standard functionality.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Similar Messages

  • Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

    Please can any one update on it.
    Dear Friends.
    I have configured vendor evaluation in following  way .
    1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
    Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
                   Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense  that it will give me Ven. evaluation
    Regards,
    MAhesh
    Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

    Hi Mahesh,
    the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
    also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
    Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
    Vendor Evaluation Process
    regards,
    Adwait Bachuwar

  • Vendor evaluation - Quantity Score for Service Items

    Hi experts,
    Vendor Evaluation is active in our client system.
    There are both material and service vendors for score evaluation.
    One of the service vendors is having a Quantity Reliability (Delivery criteria) score of 100.
    Only services (item cat SERVICE) is procured from this vendor.
    The On-Time Delivery performance score is 0 (not calculated).
    Why is Quantity Reliability set to 100 if all material documents are related to service items?
    Anybody face such issue before?
    Plz provide your inputs..thanks!

    Hi.
    You need to configure Output type NAHN (Dunning).  Define condition records. Follow the same steps as you configure PO output type NEU.
    Make sure the 1st/2nd/3rd reminder days are maintained n PIR.
    These days are displayed in Delivery Tab of the PO.
    If the above output type is determined, then a standard SAP batch job automaticall ryns  ME9F to send reminders /expeditors to the vendor. You dont have to do any other config for this
    regards,
    Shashidar

  • Vendor Evaluation-Scoring logic for percentage

    Dear Experts,
    I have mention below %  and score of vendors for sub criteria on-time delivery,it is mention in std SAP..I want to know % value is calculated here? how negative % values is given score?
    -          100     On-time del.
    1,0       90     On-time del.
    2,0         95     On-time del.
    10,0         80     On-time del.
    20,0         60     On-time del.
    30,0         40     On-time del.
    40,0         20     On-time del.
    50,         5     On-time del.
    99,9           1     On-time del.
    -5,0            95     On-time del.
    -10,0     65     On-time del.
    -20,0     75     On-time del.
    -30,0     60     On-time del.
    -40,0     40     On-time del.
    -50,0     20     On-time del.
    -60,0     5     On-time del.
    -99,9     1     On-time del.
    Thanks,

    Hi Shyam,
    I am also looking for the same.
    can u send me the full details of the Vendor Evaluation score % calculation .
    and MANUAL, Semi Auromatic,  Fully Automatic  Evaluation. what is the difference.
    what is the function of end user for execute Vendor evaluation for all the VENDORS AT A TIME.?
    Regards,
    Anthyodaya.

  • Vendor Evaluation Price Level  For services

    Hi expert, I've seen that the Main Criterion "Price" is just for materials, and I wanted to know whether there is a way of Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria for services.
    I also wanted to know if there is any other standar criterion for evaluating services.
    Thanks !!

    Hi,
    Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
    C Determination from quality rating of service
    D Determination from timeliness rating of service
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
    At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
    - Quality of service
    - Service timeliness
    Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
    Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
    And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it during ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

  • Vendor Evaluation - calculating score for subcriteria Confirmation date

    Hi,
    I have configured vedor evaluation with subcriteria Confirmation date with B
    But while maintaing vendor evaluation ,system is not calculating score.
    As per my understanding system compares the date of inbound delivery and actual GR date.
    Can somebody help me on this how system calculates score or what is missing.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Charudatta

    Hi,
    Look at this article, it explains how it is calculated.
    [http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
    Thanks.

  • Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

    Hi,
    I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
    Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
    Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
    Thanks in advance,
    Kind regards

    hi,
    Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
    Variance             Score
    -99.9%               1
    +99.9%              100
    A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
    check the following link.
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
    regards
    sumit simran

  • Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

    Hi Gurus
    I have a requirement wherein I  have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
    1. Productivity  with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
    2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
    3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
    The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and  25 respectively.
    Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
    I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
    An early reply will be very helpful to me.
    thanks and regards
    Ashok Kumar Pitla

    T147   - Control table for vendor evaluation
    T147A - Definition for main criteria
    T147B - Text for main criteria
    T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
    T147D - Text for sub-criteria
    T147E - Definition of weighting keys
    T147F - Description of weighting keys
    T147G - Main criteria
    T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
    T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
    T147J - Weighting keys
    T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
    T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
    T147M - Definition of scope of list
    T147N - Text for scope of list
    T147O - Scope of List
    T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
    T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

  • System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

    HI....
    I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
    Regards
    SARFRAZ

    Hi,
    Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
    1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
    2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
    3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
    4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic  criteria for each percentage vainance
    Hope this fulfils your query
    Regards

  • How to induct Quality criteria in to already existing Vendor Evaluation ?

    Hi
    My Client has configured all the Vendor Evaluation structure. But Quality is not maintained in that structure. Now,
    1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
    2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
    3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
    Thanks
    Maruthi

    1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
    you can just activate the quality criteria (it is already exist in the system)
    2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
    No
    3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
    Yes if you want the system to be calculated automatically otherwise make the quality criteria as manual and enter the points when you run vensor evaluation.
    if you keep automatic than it will read from usage decision and to have that the QM should be active.

  • Purchasing Vendor Evaluation

    Please help me by providing the business content datasources that provides me the bewlow information.
    From which extractor , I can get the vendor evaluation score based for Invoices .?
    the criteria we are concerned with for vendor evaluations are as follows:
    · Delivery
    o On-Time Delivery (Statistical GR Date vs. Actual GR Date)
    o Quantity Reliability (Qty to be shipped on PO vs. Qty actually received)
    · Invoice

    thank you for your help, I need this information on schedule line level. I have looked at the datasource 2lis_02_scl and this datsource does not have PO order qty or Delivery Level Information.
    I can enhance the datasource to add these keyfigures but my concern is how to handle the delta. If the quantity is changed by itself and this will not be picked by the delta.
    Can you provide some solution to handle the delta issue.
    Regards,
    Raghu Reddy

  • Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

    Dear Friends,
    I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
    Regards,
    Saurav

    Dear Friend,
    Kindly go through the below documents,
    Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
    http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

  • Vendor Evaluation with QM - Tables

    Hello
    Can any one help the table information such us vendor evaluation main criteria and sub-criteria. Information stored in the audit lot , rejections and complaints etc. Please i am looking for only Vendor Evaluation with QM - related Tables information only .
    Thanks for your help
    Nic

    T147   - Control table for vendor evaluation
    T147A - Definition for main criteria
    T147B - Text for main criteria
    T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
    T147D - Text for sub-criteria
    T147E - Definition of weighting keys
    T147F - Description of weighting keys
    T147G - Main criteria
    T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
    T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
    T147J - Weighting keys
    T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
    T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
    T147M - Definition of scope of list
    T147N - Text for scope of list
    T147O - Scope of List
    T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
    T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

  • Weight Key in Vendor Evaluation

    Hi all,
    How the Weighting  key in Vendor Evaluation is updating for Each Vendor?
    If it is automatically Updating why ME6E is required?
    regardds
    Gibi Philip

    hi,
    Weighting Keys
    A weighting key is an identifier under which the weighting factors for a number of main criteria can be grouped together and saved.
    If you know that you will want to carry out an evaluation repeatedly with certain main criteria and certain weighting factors, you can save this combination under a weighting key.
    When you carry out the next vendor evaluation, just enter the relevant weighting key instead of entering a weighting factor for each individual criterion. The system then automatically sets all the weighting factors.
    There are two possible types of weighting key in the standard system:
    Key 01
    Key 02
    Key 01 permits the equal weighting of all criteria.
    Key 02 enables you to evaluate vendors supplying small parts, for example.
    The weighting factors under this key are distributed as follows:
    Price 5
    Quality 3
    Delivery 2
    Gen. service/support 1
    External service provision 2
    Hope it explains you the importance ...
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    AWARD IF HELPFULL

  • Vendor Evaluation - Price history

    Hi
    In vendor evaluation the score for the subcriteria Price History is not getting calculated.
    The scoring method that I have used is : Automatic Determ. from Purch. Statistics: Price Behavior
    What can be the reason? How it is calculated?
    Regards

    to determine how a vendor's price for a material has changed over the last few years, the material's price history is compared with the market price history.
    The system first checks whether the buyer has maintained the current market price and last year's market price for the material.
    If not, the system uses the price for the material group to which the material belongs.
    If this price is not maintained either, the system uses the effective prices from the previous year and the current year. Prices from standard purchase orders for materials and prices from subcontract orders are dealt with separately.
    The system then calculates the percentage variance between the old and new market prices.
    The vendor's effective price is re-calculated with this percentage variance. The result represents the effective price the vendor should be asking if his price had changed over time in the same way as the market price.
    This calculated effective price is then compared with the actual effective price, and a percentage variance is determined.
    The system then awards the vendor the score you have maintained in Customizing for this percentage variance.
    The system repeats this process for all the materials you procure from the vendor. Each time you start an evaluation, the system calculates the average score for all the materials. The result is the vendor's score for the subcriterion "Price History".

Maybe you are looking for