Vendor evaluation using Invoice criteria

Hi SAP gurus,
I want to know if anybody has used de Invoice criteria in Vendor Evaluation, that is available in ERP 2005.
The subcriterias Price Variance and Quantity Variance are automatic?
Can we use them only with MM Module or do we need the SRM functionalities?
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards,
SN

Hi
In invoice main criteria we have
- Quantity variance
- Price variance
Quantity Variance
With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the quantity to be invoiced agrees with the quantity actually invoiced.
Price Variance
With this criterion, you evaluate how exactly the price to be invoiced agrees with the price actually invoiced.
In order for evaluation results for the two last-mentioned subcriteria to be generated automatically, you must activate invoice evaluation for the company code. In the process, you also define the maximum points score per company code.
You can refer the documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Thanks !
E.Avudaiappan

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation using Factory Calendar?

Hello,
Can I set up Vendor Evaluation to consider the Factory Calendar when scoring with the Standard Delivery Date Variance?
I have set it up to allow the delivery to score 100% of the points if the delivery is in by 6AM the following day. But this does not work over the weekends.
Thanks,
Matt

Please help.
There must be some way to do this.
If the factory is closed on the weekends and you miss a Friday delivery, even though you could have made the Saturday delivery you have to wait until Monday and SAP scores you as though you were 3 days late instead of the actual 1 day late.
How can I make Vendor Evaluation use the factory calendar?
Thanks,
Matt

Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathy

hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish

Vendor Evaluation using Material Group

Dear all
Kindly let me know whether Vendor evalation is possible using material Group.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Dear all
What I mean to say it, we do not have follwoing master in our company.
Material master, Vendor master & Pur.Info records,I did not know what configuration has been there in PRD server,But once we gave Authorization to our user regarding Vendor Report, they are getting the Vendor evaluated automatically,So I thought It is taking the material Group as a reference for Evaluation,That why i requesting your guy how we can do configuration in related to Vendor Evaluation.
Regards
M.Chandra mohan

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Score problem in vendor evaluation for sub criteria Quantity Reliability...

Hi Experts,
For the subcriteria Quantity Reliability i have calculated the score like below,
pur.order quantity - 1000.
receipt qty - 900.
var = 900-1000/1000 *100 = 10%.
10% var = 90 pts.
old score - 41
new score -90
smoothing factor - .30
41 * (1-.30) + 90 * .30 = 56. Am getting,but
system calculates 59.how.Is there any configuration problem.
I hardly need to solve this.pls anyone help me.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Ranganayahi Chandirasekaran on Nov 4, 2009 12:17 PM

Hi,
to answer your question satisfactorily we need to knwo about more details.
what are the minimum delivery factors, overdelivery and underdelivery tolerances?
these all are considered in the score calculations.
to adjust the score the system gives high priority to average score that is 1-smoothing factor.
if you have just updated the score for same delivery then the score calculation is different.
in case of further queries please find the MMSIV document you could find it in some fo the posts.
you will get some more information in one of my earlier posts.
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Vendor evaluation at material level

Hi friends,
I have one requirement from client. A vendor supplies many materials. My client want to get report of vendor rating of the vendor for each material and material groupwise.
Can this objective can be achieved?
Please suggest.
Regards

Hi,
When you run Vendor Evaluation (for all criteria), sysytem keeps log of all material level points the Vendor has achieved. You can view the same in transaction ME64.
Regards,
Prashant

Mass Maintain weighting key for vendor evaluation.?

Hi experts
Can anybody give some inputs for below issue
1.How to maintain weighting key for vendors .
2.How to maintain weighting key for all vendors in mass .(Mass maintainence)
3.How to get the report of vendor ranking list duration wise (Month, year..etc).
Regards
MM group

weighting keys is customizing, and this is certainly not by vendor.
you define one weighting key and then you run vendor evaluation using this weighting key.

Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

Hi,
I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
2. Morale
These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and 2) Service Timeliness are already available.
Thanks in advance.
Chetan Shah

Hello Chetan,
have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
Kind Regards
TomT

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Vendor evaluation criteria rejects/complaints

Hi,
I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ?
Also is it mandatory to use the Q2/F2 notifications types for vendor evaluation.? What if I create my own Z notification type with origin Q2 ? Will vendor eval still work ?
Thanks

Hi Shailendra,
I am aware of all these settings and have gone thru your document as well. However if you read my post carefully you will see what I am actually asking.
"I have configured the vendor evaluation to look at the rejection/complaints sub criteria with the scoring method as 8 = Automatic Determ. from Quality Stat.: Quality Notification. The first time I create a notification, the score drops from 100 straight to 1. Then later no matter how many notifications I create and close with external or internal origin, the score remains at 1. How do I change the score ? "
My question is...how do I show all the notificaitons of type external origin when I run my ME63 report ? Right now no matter how many notifications I create and assign the the external origin, they dont show up in ME63.
Thanks

Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

Please can any one update on it.
Dear Friends.
I have configured vendor evaluation in following way .
1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
               Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
Regards,
MAhesh
Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

Hi Mahesh,
the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
Vendor Evaluation Process
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Vendor Evaluation - Creating new partial criteria

Hello,
My client wants to use Vendor Evaluation but wants to use another date to evaluate its vendors.
Is it possible to define a new partial criteria based on a date which are not the standard Confirmation date or expected receipt date and use it in automatic valuation of the principal criteria? like a date which one manages in a table Z?
Are there any user exits or Badi´s to acomplish this?
Anyone had experience with this already. How did they resolve it?
Thanks for any clue.
Aart

Use MM06L001 the user Exit for determination of ratings in vendor evaluation .

Is Quality management module required to be used for vendor evaluation?

Hi,
There is vendor evaluation functionality in MM. Is use of quality management module is mandatory for this? I wish to track the performance of vendor regarding quality (How much he has supplied, out of which how many are accepted and how many are rejected). Can I get this report without using QM?
Thanks in advance,
Satish

you can enter Quality results manually in vendor evealuation, so QM is not necessary for this, however with QM you can get the scores semi-automatic and automatically.

Vendor evaluation using Invoice criteria

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for