Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

Please can any one update on it.
Dear Friends.
I have configured vendor evaluation in following way .
1)     Price (main criteria) u2013 a) price level [60] b) price behavior [30] c)market behavior[10]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
2)     Quality (main criteria)- a) GR inspection [40] b)Rejection/complaints [40] c)Audit [20]
Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
3)     Delivery- a)Ontime[30] b)Qty reliability[40] c) shiping instruction[10] d) adhere to conf.date[20]
               Que u2013 where we have to put above sub criteria a, b, c mans at which transaction level in sense that it will give me Ven. evaluation
Regards,
MAhesh
Edited by: mahesh A on Jul 11, 2011 8:53 PM

Hi Mahesh,
the path is img.....mm......purchasing......vendor evaluation......maintain criterion for purchasing organizations
also please find some useful links for vendor evaluation
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/VendorEvaluationin+MM-PUR
Looking for Vendor evaluation steps
Vendor Evaluation Process
regards,
Adwait Bachuwar

Similar Messages

Where can we see the cost estimate which is got deleted.

Where can we see the cost estimate which is got deleted.

Hello rajesh as you told that the cost esimate is deleted.
Then there is no way to see the cost estimate.
You canonly see the cost esimate in CK40N or in CK13N but you can not see the itemiaxation of that material for ehich we create the cost estimate.
Hope it will clear you
IF this informetion is usefull for you please assign some points
Regards
Ravi

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Partial Good Receeipt for Evaluation of On Time Delivery Sub Criteria

Hello
Im customizing Vendor Evaluation in SAP ECC 6 I defined a Purchasing Value Key, as a follow:
Minimun Req Qty: 99,9%,
StdValue Days: 1 Day ,
because of a lot partial delivary for special material we prefer system score delivary time according to last GR posting date .
when run ME63 ,In the first delivary posting the system do not calculating score that is correct but in the next delivary system still do not considering score ,why? we expext in the last delivary the system finally calculating rate?
I think the system can not add all partial delivary for calculating score?
It would be my pleasure if you help me,
Regards,
Azam

I don't think that you can have an individual scoring method for one vendor, so a change of customizing will affect all vendors.
A delivery date of an entire month would mean the last date of the month is the date in date field.
So you would need to setup your percentages so that 30 days early delivery are still get a 100 %

Vendor Evaluation - Underdelivery Tolerance for Qty. reliability Criteria

Hi experts.
When using Underdelivery tolerance in a PO, the Evalation criteria Qty. reliability is not taking into account this tolerance and give a vendor a score based on the requested qty.
It doesn't make any sense to me, since I'm allowing the vendor to deliver up to this tolerance.
Please advice.
Thanks.

Hi,
When calculating score for quantity reliability, the Minimum delivery quantity % mentioned in customizing (Txn OMGL) is only taken into account, so that if the delivered quantity is below this then the score for the vendor will not be calculated.
The underdelivery tolerance is not checked. This is the standard functionality.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N).

Hi,
I like to add two additional sub criteria for Vendor Evaluation tab in SES (ML81N). Based on which vendor evaluation will be calculated.
1. Safety/Envt Upkeep
2. Morale
These two are added in SPRO->Purchasing->Vendor Evaluation ->Define Criteria. But not displayed in ML81N->Vendor Evaluation tab.
Existing criteria. 1) Quality of Service and 2) Service Timeliness are already available.
Thanks in advance.
Chetan Shah

Hello Chetan,
have you checked note 79166 "MM-SRV Hint: Vendor evaluation for service"?
Define an evaluation criterion for services in Customizing of the vendor evaluation to be able to use the vendor evaluation also for the services management.The main criterion must contain the determination methods 'C' (determination from the quality valuation of the service) and 'D' (determination from the timeliness rating of the service) in the sub-criteria.
Kind Regards
TomT

How to induct Quality criteria in to already existing Vendor Evaluation ?

Hi
My Client has configured all the Vendor Evaluation structure. But Quality is not maintained in that structure. Now,
1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
Thanks
Maruthi

1. How can we induct Quality in to the Vendor Evaluation without disturbing the other main criteria in it ?
you can just activate the quality criteria (it is already exist in the system)
2. Will there be sudden impact on the other areas in the system ?
No
3. Should the Quality management be activated for the materials if they are to be considered in to this Vendor Evalution. ?
Yes if you want the system to be calculated automatically otherwise make the quality criteria as manual and enter the points when you run vensor evaluation.
if you keep automatic than it will read from usage decision and to have that the QM should be active.

System setting for vendor evaluation incomplete

HI....
I want to caryout automatic vendor evaluation when i run t code ME63, its show an error system setting for purchase org incomplete where as i have maintained all the parameters from standarfd 0001, can anyone tell me how to carry out ven evaluation.
Regards
SARFRAZ

Hi,
Select SPRO --> Materials Management --> Purchasing --> Vendor Evaluation. Select following criteria -
1) Define Weighing keys - Here define weighing keys in addition to 01- Equal Weighing & 02- Unequal Weighing (if required)
2) Define Criteria - Here 5 standard criteria are maintained. Maintain additional criteria if required. Also maintain sub-criteria. Each main criteria contains some standard subcriteria. If required you may maintain additional subcriteria upto 20 per main criteria.
3) Define Scope List - Here you may maintain how the evaluated vendors should be ranked.
4) Define Purchase Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation - Here you may maintain main criteria & sub-criteria for your purchasing organisation. Also maintain score for equal & unequal weighing. Maintain point score for automatic criteria for each percentage vainance
Hope this fulfils your query
Regards

Lead time in Vendor Evaluation

Hi MM Gurus,
I want to add Replenishment Lead Time in Vendor Evaluation.Where from the lead time effects the scoring of a vendor in the vendor evaluation means the vendor evaluation also be based on Lead time?
Please give step by step procedure.....
Points will be awarded.

hi,
Lead time for processing u can mention in the Material master .
OR u can put it in inforecord also.
from that system will propose the planned delivery date in PO
with reference to this date and the actual GR posting date system will calculate the varience and gives points to the vendor.
i think if this is ur requirement then it is available in standard SAP functionality.
regards,
sujit

Vendor evaluation - Service

hi
we have following requirements:
1) Addition of new sub criteria for the main criterion "Service"   (we already use standard sub criterion --- timeliness of service and quality of service).
       i) Legal requirements
      ii) Safety
     iii) Damanges / Penalty
These sub criterion should appear during Service entry sheet (as timeliness of service and quality of service appears) and user will enter the scores against this sub criterion.
Pl suggest.
2) When Service will be procured by central purchasing group ---vendor evaluation should consider following sub criterion only
     i) Timeliness of service
    ii) Quality of service
When Service will be procured by local purchasing group ---vendor evaluation should consider following all sub criterion
   i) Timeliness of service
    ii) Quality of service
iii) Legal requirements
      iv) Safety
     v) Damanges / Penalty
Pl suggest how we can achieve this
regards
Pravin

Hi,
the enhancement MM06L001 comprises four function exits, which are invoked
during the calculation of the scores for the subcriteria.
In order to satisfy your business process you need to write your own
coding into the function modules
1. EXIT_SAPLMEL0_001
2. EXIT_RM06LBAT_001
3. EXIT_SAPMM06L_001
4. EXIT_RM06LBEW_001
Regards,
Edit

Vendor evaluation cube ?

Hello ,
I was just going through business content cube for vendor evaluation and i could see mutipple cube with same name in convention .
Could you please let me know which one is the latest one and how to determine it ?
Vendor Evaluation Technical name: 0PUR_C02
Vendor Evaluation Data Technical name: 0PUR_C05
Vendor Evaluation Data (Semi-Automatic) Technical name: 0PUR_C06
Subsequent Settlement u2013 Evaluation Technical Name: 0PUR_C03
Which one should i active ?
Regards

Hi,
It depends on your reuirement for Vendor analysis, and you need to activate all/some of them.
For example ; you can take some of the infoobjects like
0PUR_C02 - Vendor information, material, purches org, plant and some score fields as key figure
0PUR_C05- Overall score , score on time basic , delivery basic etc.. and create a generic datasource for the above required fields and pull the data from R/3 to BW.
Also pls chk this link;
Re: Vendor evaluation infosource
Regards
CSM Reddy

Automatic Sub-Criteria: PRICE HISTORY in Vendor Evaluation

Hello All,
Can anybody help me in understanding what actually the following mean in Automatic Vendor Evaluation!!
1) Effective Price
2) Calculated Effective Price
3) Actual Effective Price
4) Calculated Effective Price for a particular Vendor
I see all this in the following link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cf8414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Under "How the System computes Scores:"
Under "Calculating Scores for Automatic Subcriteria:Overview"
Under "Price History (Main Criterion "Price")"
Thanks

Hi ZEYNEP,
1) Effective price - End price after taking all conditions (for example, cash discounts, delivery costs etc.) into account.
2) Total Price - Price arrived at after taking all discounts and surcharges into account
3) Total value = total quantity x price
When a price changes, the value of the stock changes, since the value is calculated from the price:
4) Effective (actual) price: Net price minus cash discount and plus miscellaneous provisions and delivery costs as well as non-deductible input tax
In simple - Total Cost - Expenditure on material till Goods Receipt (Procurement) and Effective cost - including all expenses till delivery from factory or some times till reach the consumer (vary depend upon the nature of business).
Here is an example
Material Price is $ 1000/-
& Discount is 10% and tax is 10% and freight is $ 50/-,Fixed( it may also %)
So Here the Material Price is called Gross Price $ 1000/-
Gross Price ($ 1000/-)- Discount {$ 100/-(10% of $ 1000/-)}= Net Price $ 900/-
Here Net Price $ 900/-
Tax $ 90/- ($ 900/- +$ 90 = $ 990/- is called sub-total)
Freight $ 50/-
$ 1040/-
The Total Price ($ 1040/-) is called Effective Price.
Hope this is helpful. Reward if useful.
Thanks

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Goods receipt sub critaria in vendor evaluation

In vendor evaluation there is one sub-critaria goods receipt under main critaria quality, in this how system calcutae the tax.
i went through the sap help doc, in this it is mentiaoned that
"When you run an automatic re-evaluation for a vendor, the system selects all the incoming inspection lots for the vendor that lie within the validity period and calculates the average of the scores. The result is the vendor's score for the quality of goods received."
i m not understand with this. plz specify in your words and where we maintain the validity period?

Hi,
In the sub-criteria Goods Receipt, system dows not calculate tax. In the main criteria of Quality, if your material is maintained for quality inspection type 01, then system creates inspection lots for GRN. The score of each inspection lot is calculated based on you settings (For example based on usage decision). The system then saves these scores of each inspection lot. These scores are then averaged out for all the inspection lots those lie within the validity periods.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Prashant

Vendor evaluation- where to put (see) sub criteria on which screen

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for