Vendor field as required for SRM 7.0
Hello,
when we are creating a Shopping Cart, I need to put vendor field as mandatory for some categories in SAP SRM 7.0
I know how to do it in SAP SRM 4.0, however they change it in this version...
could you please help me?
Thanks.
Regards,
Nelson
Hello,
Have you tried to use BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI?
Depending on the product category, you can check if vendor field is empty. If so, an error message would be raised.
Kind regards,
Ricardo
Similar Messages
-
Vendor material no. required for consignment
Hi Experts,
I need to make the Vendor Material No field mandatory in the Info Record for all consignment inforecords.
In Tcode OMF1 I can choose Vendor Material as required field, but this affects all inforecords.
Does anyone know how to specify that this <b>only</b> will be required for Consignment Info Records?
Thanks in advance,
AndersHI,
I am afraid that the field controls do not have the type of info record as part of the check and so the short answer is that it can't be done this way.
I suppose that you therefore have two possible solutions, a user exit or if one is not available a copy of ME12 modified to make the field mandatory according to the info record type. (perhaps the modified ME12 could only be used for consignment info records)
I don't like mods like this but if you really need to do it I cannot think of another way.
Steve B -
Vendor Field not available for Tax Condition
Hello Gurus
We have created a new pricing condition type to capture the Taxes
Condition Class: A( Taxes)
Calculation Type : A (Percentage)
Cond Category: D(Tax)
When i used this condition in PO and select the details of the conditions i can't find the field (vendor-lifnr) in the condition type at all.
When i checked the same for Frieght ( FRB1) in the condition type detials i can see the vendor which i can even change.\
Is it not possble to have vendor field when i have taxes condition class? If not how can i bring this into my condition type details screen
regards
mohammedThanks for you speedy reply ,
We wanted to post this TAX condition to a different vendor than the vendor of the PO. in my condition i did not see the field VENDOR, how can i get this feild VENDOR in this condition details.
Regard
Mohammed -
Vendor field on PO for Subcontracting
Their is a vendor field (EMLIF) and subcontracting vendor field (LBLKZ) that can be used with subcontracting PO's. Is there a way to default this from the PO info record? I have searched thru this forum and other locations. The only thing I have seen is you might be able to default this from a contract.
I would appreciate any ideas on defaulting these 2 fields besides using contracts.
Thanks,
MarkHi,
Only way this can be done would be through enhancement, rather than defaulting the field from Info Record (especially subcontractor vendor field) maintain Z table and populated them from there based on (say document type, item category) etc.
Hope you find this useful.
Reetesh
Edited by: Reetesh on Nov 19, 2011 9:35 PM -
Requirements for SRM 2007 (EBP:E-Procurement)?
Hi Guys,
I recently was scheduled to implement the latest release of SRM/E-Procurement to our ERP6.0 Landscape.
Unfortunately, I am pretty new to this topic and everything I know is that the latest release is SRM2007.
Could anybody tell me what exactly needs to be installed?
What packages?
As far as I know, EBP is included into SRM. But is it enough to just install SRM or do I need any additons to run EBP (E-Procurement).
The underlying system is/will be SAP ECC 6.0.
I am really looking forward to your answers
yours
Erik
Edited by: Erik Nagler on May 27, 2008 1:50 PMSRM 2007 (SRM 6.0 )is still not avilable for general release and ongoing for ramp-up customers only.
The release was due this year but delayed.
For SRM add on installations on ECC
you should see the follow threads
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/index_srmaddon.htm
Re: SRM Addon Upgrade Path with ERP2005 ( ERP 6.0 )
SRM 5.0 as an Add on with ECC 6.0
SRM 5.5 as an add-on on ECC 6.0 vs SAP SRM 5.5 server
BR
Dinesh -
Backup requirements for SRM/SUS
Hi Gurus,
is there any special reuirement for backing up the SRM and SUS system.
Regards!Normally when upgrade patches are applied to systems basis advise to backup the working clients
but have not heard about special back up for SRM-SUS.
BR
Dinesh -
New field NOTES required for each activity listed in BP factsheet
Hi Experts.
We are trying to have a new field NOTES for each activity listed in BP factsheet. For activity we have several fields like description, status , dates etc but notes (long text) is not there for the activity.
Could anyone help us out.
Regards,
RahulHi Saumya,
I want to use the standard activity notes field here.
My requirement is to display the column Activity notes in activities assigment block of account Factsheet.
BP_Factshheet/Activities is the view and the Context node BUILACTIVITY does not have the attribute activity notes.
Please give your inputs
Regards,
Rahul -
How to set a signature field as 'Required' with selection of a Check Box
I have a set of 3 check boxes and would like to set a unique combination of pre-existing signature fields as 'required' for each respective check box.
Given Check Box names of Box1, Box2, Box3 and Signature Field names of Sig1, Sig2, Sig3, can someone provide example JavaScript for setting Sig1 and Sig3 as required upon a Mouse Up of Box 1?
Otherwise, can someone let me know if this might be more trouble than it's worth?
Thanks!Sorry to keep you waiting Greenstead - and thank you for responding.
My need for this feature, however, has passed.
I do have another question or two, but will post as a separate thread.
Thanks again -
Business Package for SRM 7.0 EHP1
Dear `SRM Gurus,
What is which SRM business package version required for SRM 7.0 EHP1
Reagrds,
VinodIt is BP SRM 7.01
-
Mutiple Bidding for SRM 7.0 SP01
Hi All,
We have one requirement for SRM 7.0, we want to use Single step bid and two step bid, which will depend on requirements.
Any ideas, how to achieve this two step bidding?
Thanks,
AnkurHi,
Could you explain details of "2 step bidding"?
Is it 2nd round of RFx? 1st RFx is like RFI for 10 suppliers and 2nd Rfx is like RFQ for 5 suppliers.
Regards,
Masa -
USER EXIT or BADI for Vendor field in MIRO
Hi Experts,
In MIRO transaction vendor field gets defaulted from Purchase Order. So my requirement is to changes that vendor with alternate payee.
To <u>replace the vendor with alternate payee</u> I need the <b>USER EXIT or BADI</b>, kindly help me on this will be useful for us.
Thanks in Advance.
SAP ConsultantTransaction Code - MIGO Goods Movement
Exit Name Description
MBCF0002 Customer function exit: Segment text in material do
MBCF0005 Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0006 Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0007 Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0009 Filling the storage location field
MBCF0010 Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_
MBCF0011 Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MB_CF001 Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Ma
No of Exits: 8
BAPI-step by step procedure
http://www.sapgenie.com/abap/bapi/example.htm
list of all BAPI's
http://www.planetsap.com/LIST_ALL_BAPIs.htm
Rewards if useful.................
Minal -
Vendor Material No. and Vendor Batch field in MIGO for GR against Order
HI,
I received a very specific requirment for one of our client: Client need the field Vendor Material No. and Vendor Batch in the detail data --> material and batch tab in MIGO transcation for A01 (Goods receipt ) against R08 (Order), this is for good receipt against Process Order, Here though the vendor does not come in picture , these field are required. These field are appearing in GR(A01 against Purchase order(R01)
Regards
RahulHi,
First of all, why do you want Vendor Batch no & material no while doing receipt against process order. You can enter the same while doing a GR against Purchase order & same can be tracked using some reports.
As you said, since you are doing a receipt against the Process order, vendor doesn't come in picture. Hence the vendor batch no: or vendor material no: wont be populated as per Std.SAP. You can check for some enhancements/BAdi's in MIGO transaction to populate the same.
Thanks & Regards, -
SAP components required for implemeting SAP SRM MDM
Hi all,
Plz let me know , the SAP components required for implemeting SAP SRM MDM , for the following points:
· Internal catalogs hosted and maintained by buyer?
· Internal catalogs that are maintained by vendor (vendor will be using buyer's firewall)?
· External catalogs hosted and maintained by vendor?
Thanks and regards
HarishHi Harish,
The SAP components you would be needed are
SAP MDM5.5 or 7.1
- MDM server
- MDIS server
- MDSS server
SAP SRM5.5 or 7.0
SAP SRM-MDM business content
WAS engine typically used for deploying sca files given by SAP for configuring MDM as catalog. Mostly was engine of SRM is used in such case.
If you need an integration with backend system SAP PI will be used.
refer note
1057316 - SRM-MDM Catalog 2.0 - Installation & configuration.
refer article for understanding mdm catalog configuration steps
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10d1bde2-699f-2910-8e86-f46bfe045fdc
Regards,
Abhijeet
Edited by: abhijeet more on Apr 20, 2009 1:19 PM -
Field STCEG required at FB01 (one-time vendor account)
Hello,
Does anyone know how to put the field STCEG required when posting, through FB01 or similar, to an one-time vendor account?
Thanks!Hi,
Account group field status determine the status while creating/ changing the master data.
For posting, you can control via posting key setting or field status assigned to gl.
As you need to make it as required only for one time vendors, so create a validation in OB28/ GGB1 for it.
Regards,
Gaurav -
Vendor field empty for RE line items in FBL3N
dear all-
I'm experiencing a strange situation. Instead of using the MM-report, I want to do a GRIR analysis in FI. When I run FBL3N for the GRIR account I see that for the goods-receipt related documents (doc type WE) field like puchase order and vendor number are populated (and contain a value). However for the line items that come from the invoice the field purchase order is filled but the field vendor is blank.
I did have a look at the BSEG table for the WE- and RE-related documents: for all line items of the WE document (goods receipt) the fields purchase order and vendor contained a value, for the RE document (invoice receipt) all line items have a value for purchase order but only the first line item (vendor line) has a value for the field vendor. On all the other line items the vendor field is blank.
Looks pretty strange to me, who has a good solution?
thx
Benhi Vishal-
Thanks for the BSIK, BSIS tip!
In the meantime I did find report RFWERE00. I was able to generate a list that indeed showed the vendor number on the GRIR account both from the GR- and RE-document. Didn't have time yet to go over the code to figure out where this report gets its data from.
The report offers options to do actual clearing and do postings ... I'm not interested in that. Only in the list. I have a start now ...
... If you have another I idea that prevents me from creating a customer report ... I'm eager to hear it!
rgds
Ben
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to check/verify running sql in lib cache is using updated statistics of table
How to check/verify running sql in lib cache is using updated statistics of table used in from clause. one of my application table is highly busy i.e frequent update/insert/delete. we gather table stats every 30 min.
-
Pdf files as attachments, inconsistent, some open some as file?
WHen i attach multiple pdf files, sometimes they just show up at the attachment and sometimes they are open in the email. I prefer the former. How can I make them all the same? They can be created from the same application the same way, no rhyme or r
-
Process order settlement error
Hi all while doing settlement of process order in KO88, system throwing the follwing error. '' valuation data for the material is being locked by the user xxxxxx'' . If we check in transaction: SM12 , here system showing
-
Every time. And there's no obvious way to avoid it.
-
ConcurrentModificationException in RequestContextImpl class
Am currently getting a ConcurrentModificationException thrown by the notifyRequestCompletionListeners method of the RequestContextImpl class. The context is: A JSP includes two JSP fragments, containing tiled views bound to primary models and surroun