Vendor Release Group Change but not Confirmed

Dear experts,
Good day!
I would like to seek your thoughts regard with change in vendor release group.
We have vendor XXX which change relase group (LFB1-FRGRP) from AP01 to AP02.
The change was not yet confirmed (FK08).
Apparently document posting use AP02 (new) as release group. Since it is not yet confirmed AP01 should be in use.
Greatly appreciate your thoughts.
Thanks!

Hello,
Check if the field you mentioned is a sensitive field.
SPRO => Financial Accounting => Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable => Vendor Accounts => Master Data => Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data => Define Sensitive Fields for Dual Control (Vendors)
REgards,
REnan

Similar Messages

Storage bin available when posting change is not confirmed completely

Dear Gurus, I have a question for you:
My costumer wants to do a posting change when the material is released from QM with a decision usage from Q to unrestricted use. The process is done in two steps: with LU04 the TO is generated and with LT12 is confirmed. When the TO is generated the position is half confirmed. With LT21 we can see the row for the ST (lets say ST 504 Open Storage type) and a second row 922 TR-ZONE. The first row appears green (as confirmed) and the second row appears red (Not confirmed).
My costumer says that " beacause of the strategy given for the storage entry, the storage bin released in the TO (not confirmed completely yet) is available at this moment.
If the storage bin is still physically full, the carrier will found not space for leaving the goods even SAP is telling him there is space available at this storage bin."
I have read that once yo start a TO the storage bin is blocked until the transaction is fully confirmed.
If this is correct I need to demostrate it and I don not find the way to do it.
I hope you understand my explanation and give me any clue.
I appreciate very much some help.
Al

agmogena wrote:
Ok, I will tell you the configuration I have. Lets point in a movement 921 quality to unrestricted use.
> Type Storage origin: 902 EQ and RC flags are set on. (confirmation control for storage type)
> Type storage TR: 922 are set on.
>
> Movement type 921 the flags for Confirm immed and Propose confirm are NOT set.
>
> I do a LU01 to create a intruction to change a material from Q to Unrestricted.
> with LT05 I create the TO.
> At this time if I look LT21 the TO created I see the tag source with two positions one for TS 902 green color and the second 922 in red.
> For the tag of target We can see the first position 922 In red and the second position 902 in green color.
>
> Perhaps this detailed explanation will help you to fully understand the scenario.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Al.
From the above it isn't entirly clear that the first part of the T.O. is actualy confirmed, my settings are to autoconfirm this so I have no example to look at in my system. Perhaps the display shows the first line green before any actual confirmation..
I assume the stock status has not changed when you first view the T.O.? If the t.o. is partly confirmed I would expect to see the stock status changed and a neg in 922 until the second part is confirmed. Perhaps there is no confirmation at all yet, in LT21 what is the confirmation status? If you view the transfer order header there would be a partial confirmation showing with a yellow triangle, do you see this or no confirmation indicated at all?

Timestamp for the redologs belong to that instance is changing but not for

redo logs on
Group Member THREAD# Archived Status ( MB)
00 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount 1 NO CURRENT 100
01 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount 1 YES INACTIVE 100
02 /mount1/dbname/mount2_a.mount 2 NO CURRENT 100
03 /mount2/dbname/mount2_b.mount 2 YES INACTIVE 100
04 /mount1/dbname/mount3_a.mount 3 NO CURRENT 100
05 /mount2/dbname/mount3_b.mount 3 YES INACTIVE 100
06 /mount1/dbname/mount4_a.mount 4 YES INACTIVE 100
07 /mount2/dbname/mount4_b.mount 4 NO CURRENT 100
Timestamp for the redologs belong to that instance is changing but not for the otherinstances on a commom storage area..
Like on node1
00 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount 1 NO CURRENT 100
01 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount 1 YES INACTIVE 100
Time stamp is changing on node 1 for redologs belong to group 10 and 11 but not for others .same thing on other nodes groups which belong to that node(thread ) are changing.
On node1.
[node51-dbname1] ls -ltr /mount*/dbname/mount*
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount3_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount2_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount3_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount2_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 21:12 /mount2/dbname/mount4_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 23:07 /mount1/dbname/mount4_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 10:54 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 12:06 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount
On node2:
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount3_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount3_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:10 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:15 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 21:12 /mount2/dbname/mount4_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 23:07 /mount1/dbname/mount4_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 10:54 /mount2/dbname/mount2_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 12:06 /mount1/dbname/mount2_a.mount
On node3:
ls -ltr /mount*/dbname/mount*
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount2_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount2_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:10 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:15 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 21:12 /mount2/dbname/mount4_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 5 23:07 /mount1/dbname/mount4_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 09:13 /mount2/dbname/mount3_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 12:06 /mount1/dbname/mount3_a.mount
On node4:
ls -ltr /mount*/dbname/mount*
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount3_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount2/dbname/mount2_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount3_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:09 /mount1/dbname/mount2_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:10 /mount2/dbname/mount1_b.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Jan 23 01:15 /mount1/dbname/mount1_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 06:07 /mount1/dbname/mount4_a.mount
-rw-r----- 1 oracle dba 104858112 Feb 6 12:06 /mount2/dbname/mount4_b.mount

If there is a question here, and a version number here, I can't find either one.
Please return to your first post, use the edit button, and format your listing use the tags show in the FAQ so what you post can be read.
Thank you.

Release is certified, but not listed in windows store

Hi
I updated my app and it was approved and certified on the 12/2/2015. I had a email with a link
http://apps.microsoft.com/windows/app/islide/51ebbb45-ff17-4c4c-80fe-f9abef20f05b
to my app but when I click on this, my app has been removed. On the dashboard it says my app has admin suspended next to it and a notification Release is certified, but not listed in windows store.
I have tried the support pages but I cannot see where I can submit a support ticket and all the links pages cannot be displayed?
How can I get my app listed on the store?
Many thanks.

Hello,
Please use the following to
contact support. We will be happy to review this for you.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Windows and Windows Phone Dev Center Support
Office Store Developer Support
Send us your feedback about the Windows Platform

Open vendor items in FBL1N but not shown in F-44 clearing vendor

Dear SAP team,
I have open items in FBL1n (display) but are not present in F-44 (vendor clearing).
Therefore clearing not possible. What can be causing this issue?
Regards
Roger

Hi
Changing Payment block many times should not be problem, unless the document currently shows with payment block.
Check corresponding entries in BSIK table for the following :
1. Payment block is blank.
2. Clearing document number and clearing date is blank.
3. Special GL indicator type and special GL indicator (UMSKS & UMSKZ) is blank.
Check in BKPF table, that the document is not having any values in reversal document number/date field.
Also go through that other values are correct at the table level.
Check for any BTE implementation too.
Regards

Vendor account group change

Hi,
I have created one vendor with wrong account group. Without changing this venor code I wanted to change the vendor account group.
I have tried with XK01 but I am getting one error "You cannot make this change because the new account group
results in the following field groups being switched off:"
Please guide me.
Thanks in advance.
Gitesh

Dear All,
Thanks to all for ur fast reply.
According to ur suggestions I have matched every thing with the old customization.
Now screens are same,partner function and schema assignment is also same.But I am geting below warning message
Caution: partner determination procedure will change from to L1 on P.Organization level
Caution: partner determination procedure will change from to L1 on VSR level
Caution: partner determination procedure will change from to L1 on Plant level
Only L1 scema is assigned to both a/c gropus.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Edited by: gitesh mahamuni on Oct 10, 2011 7:29 AM

In PP PDC Interface IDOC Message 53 , But Not Confirmed

In PP / PDC Interface is to update confirmation to the SAP system that were entered in the subsystem by IDOC.
In the incomming message status "53 Application document posted".
But the confirmation has not came.
Kind Advice .
Prasanna

Hi,
As you are saying that, status is 53 and conformation is not coming. Actually, there will be some table , which will be updating the conformation to SAP. First check that table. status doesnot depend whether your conformation is there are not. it purely, related , how you have written your code and updating the status.
thanks
manju.

Lvm2 on LUKS @ boot time: volume group found but not importing

I have so far succeeded in making ArchLinux boot as far as properly asking for my encrypted partition's passphrase and unlocking the encrypted partition (/dev/sda2) whererein lies the root filesystem; the encrypted partition contains a lvm2 group that has logical volumes on it for swap and root. However, instead of importing the group, it simply acknowledges that one exists;
:: Running Hook [lvm2]
Scanning logical volumes...
Reading all physical volumes. This may take a while...
Found exported volume group "crypt" using metadata type lvm2
Activating logical volumes...
Volume group "crypt" is exported
Waiting 10 seconds for device /dev/mapper/crypt-root ...
Root device '/dev/mapper/crypt-root' doesn't exist. Attempting to create it
Should I just increase timeout (and how do I?), or is there something else I must enable? The last 4 of my hooks are (and I know them by heart at this point): usbinput encrypt lvm2 filesystems. I do not have
I am at my wits' end. I've tried everything from different mount points in fstab (i.e. /dev/crypt/root instead of /dev/mapper/crypt-root) to putting the encrypted partition in /etc/crypttab to changing the order of "root=" and "cryptdevice=" in the kernel parameters in menu.lst, and this is as far as I have gotten.
Last edited by deconstrained (2010-11-18 11:33:47)

In https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=164267
there is a similar issue of today, but with a UUID naming instead of a label. Maybe you want to try the workaround described there with an udev-rule. If you re-typed the kernel line, please double-check it (asking that because you have lvm and LVM in there).
What's the problem with the "block" hook for you regarding the partition size?
The initramfs does not fit with the block hook? I'm asking that too, because the "block" hook includes the old "usb" one.
Is the usb-stick there at "/dev/disk/by-label/MARTINC" after boot?

SRM - PO Value changed but not updated in in R/3 and SC

Hi Yann, Vadim, Christ,
I have a query that the PO after creation in the R/3 we then uplifted the PO value. The SC has been approved earlier. Now the PO value is not updated in the backend and the SC.
I have run the FM BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC, BBP_PD_SC_TRANSFER_INTERNAL but still does not update the value
BBP_PD Shows the follwing status.
MAIN status
0000000001 I1111 Item in Transfer Process X
0000000001 I1113 Follow-on Document Created
HEADER I1009 Held X
HEADER I1015 Awaiting Approval X
HEADER I1021 Created
HEADER I1038 Complete
HEADER I1039 Incomplete X
HEADER I1080 In Transfer to Execution Syst.
HEADER I1106 Shopping cart ordered
HEADER I1129 Approved
HEADER STATUS
HEADER I1015 Awaiting Approval X
HEADER I1021 Created
HEADER I1038 Complete
HEADER I1043 Ordered
HEADER I1080 In Transfer to Execution Syst. X
HEADER I1120 Change was Transmitted
HEADER I1132 Transfer Failed (E.Sys.)
HEADER I1180 Document Completed
0000000001 I1021 Created
Please could anyone help.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Uma.

Uma,
if the second status group is for the ECS PO, I can see
HEADER I1132 Transfer Failed (E.Sys.)
The transfer of updated SRM PO to R/3 was not succesfull.
Look at application monitors in SRM (PO --> Backend errors).
Look at ST22 in R/3.
Rgds
Christophe

Password changed but not accepted when trying to sign back in

I go online and change my password. This has happened several times now. Anyway, long story short, I change it, it says okay, and then when I go back to iTunes, it lets me sign in. HOWEVER, that is as deep as I can go as I need to change the billing information and it will not let me do that.
This is a continuing headache.
There are other things, but I'll let this one be it for now
thanks
df

Try here > iTunes Store: My credit card's security code or zip code does not match my bank's records

Junk Mail colour changing, but not being flagged

I installed Tiger a couple of days ago and updated to 10.4.4. I'm noticing that particularly when I recieve several junk emails together the colour of them is changed as per my junk mail preferences, however, they are not always actually flagged as junk mail as well.
I report all of my spam through Spamcop.net, so I open all of my junk mail, however, if I see the colour has changed I know it's spam, but if I don't notice it's not actually flagged then the images load upon opening ... which is obviously not what I want.
I'm still trying to figure out a pattern for when this happens as I'm sure it's not happening all of the time - and it does seem related to receiving a batch of spam, such as first thing in the morning. I will do more attention paying, but if anyone has any clues about what the problem might be I'd be most grateful.
Thanks!

You would need to tell us what your various rules are doing, and what chaes you hve made to the junk rule.
AK

Honeycomb some time navigating in tabs does not work. if i select tab a from tab b, the header changes but not the page. It does if i move out of app and return

using samsung p6200.
If i open multiple tabs (say more than 14) so say ifi am on 14 tab and back to 12th then it will switch properly but if i go back to first tab it wont show the webpage. some tabs will show and some wont. sometime the tab will show a type of progressive image of tab which wont get more clear. But tab switches if i move out of application and return. example i am not tab 14 say gizmodo.com and i return to tab 2 say wikipedia then it wont change the page. if i go to task manager and return back to firefox then it will show the page.

I agree that it cant be as smooth but this issue is replicable in much less tabs as well.. around 4. Also i dont see any reason not to open 14 tabs as when i run Ubuntu on sam tablet parallel to Android, i can open tabs in firefox in Ubuntu. I understand the architecture difference of green bot and ubuntu for which i hate android. i wanted to hilight that firefox is working fine but somewhere it is unable to fetch data from its cache, while when OS reloads the app from background to foreground, the cache is retrieved.

Cancel the Release to Accounting but not the Billing Document

Hi Gurus,
Is there a way to Cancel the release to accounting billing document but it will not cancel the billing document. I can't cancel the billing documen because it is already used as a reference to one of our orders.
I hope you can help me...
Thanks a lot!
Mon Magallanes

Hi,
As per my understanding the accounting document in itself cannot be canceled. Because once the posting is done it will be reflected in the PL. If you cancel the billing document itself then the Accounting entries would be reversed.
Thanks,
Mukund

Midnight Release for BF3 but not MW3?

Just checked my local store events tab and it show a midnight release for Battlefield 3 but nothing for MW3...I would think if they are doing BF3 they surley would do MW3...for what its worth there was nothing on there for last nights Batman so must not have done it.
I would like to no as i preordered the MW3 Hardened Edition for in store pickup in hopes of midnight release but can go to wal-mart if i have too.,

Hey KKING,
They might not be doing a release for both of those titles as they pick which titles they want to stay open late for in advance. You could give them a call or double check on your next visit as it might not have been updated quite yet on their website given that MW3 is still 3 weeks out.

Bluegrass Cellular's Deceit! Why will Verizon allow change but not Bluegrass Cell.

Premise- The two carriers have a reciprocal agreement between the two and via that contract, Verizon supplies equipment (specifically LTE tech) onto Bluegrass towers, agreeing to share towers and equipment while Verizon agrees not to compete with BG Cellular in their small 34 county area.
Details- My wife gets a healthy corp discount through AT&T. We make the decision to move all family phones to AT&T for huge financial savings. Prior to finalizing our decision, I called Verizon for an unlock code. The support person tells me their iPhones aren't locked, at least that she's aware. Still cautious, I take my Verizon Phone to the AT&T store, insert an AT&T SIM and after a network reset, sure enough, the VZ iPhone 5 gets an AT&T signal. It's not LTE due the the difference in the two networks but it is4G HSPA+ Which I fully expected. We also spoke with Bluegrass Cellulars Corp people from the AT&T store in order to port numbers and make all necessary Changes on the spot. We asked what Bluegrass needed from us in order to complete necessary changes and they told us Nothing; they would take care of everything. They went on to tell my wife, via conf call (she wasn't with me at the time nor did we have her phone with us) what time (the following day) to turn her phone off, insert the AT&T SIM CARD, and turn back on. At that time she was to be fully functional with an AT&T signal. I completed all paperwork, paid for amenities, and we had just added 5 lines to AT&T.
Problem- after turning her phone off, inserting the new SIM AS TOLD, message on phone came up stating the SIM card would not work with that phone. Without going further into a real cluster of a mess, I'll finish this with just necessary facts in order to provide enough detail to hopefully find an answer that makes sense. I called Bluegrass Cellular requesting an unlock code in order to finish making this change. 3 times I called talking with 3 different people, all giving me the same answer...Bluegrass Cellular doesn't lock their phones. I believe that each support person honestly believed what they were telling me was true; problem is, I know it isn't. After several days of my wife having to travel for work without a phone, I just went to the AT&T store and purchased a new 5s.
We sent a complaint to the BBB just because we felt we were treated with deceitfulness. Bluegrass's response was that they did not lock their phones and the reason the phone wouldn't work was due to the different networks Bluegrass CDMA and AT&T GSM worked with. I kept telling them that answer didn't hold water because I was talking to them on a CDMA VZ phone proving they had not been admitting their phones are indeed locked.
Question- what, if anything have I overlooked? I was out $700 additional I wasn't planning on before changing her over. Can this Bluegrass Cellular phone be unlocked by a 3rd party. Bluegrass refuses to do anything. If they helped me now, they would just be admitting their deceitful practice. I'd love nothing more than to make educate the Bluegrass customers in some way. I paid my dues but don't want others blind-sided by their diligent intent to tell people whatever it is they think someone wants to hear as opposed to what's needed in order to make informed financial decisions.
Sorry for this long post but I wanted to add enough factual information and hope for I helpful replies based on good factual information. I'd love to post their BBB response as well as my rebuttal but I don't see any good coming from it. The facts are here!!!
Thanks for any help someone might provide us.
Sincerely,
Bhelson.

According to this article, iPhone: Wireless carrier support and features , Bluegrass Cellular does not offer unlocking, sorry.

Vendor Release Group Change but not Confirmed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for