Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate

Hi Gurus,
When i am trying to create Purchase Order with the QM active for that material, system gives me the following error,
Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate. I have gone through the similar thread but it gives the solution for the material whose QM is not active but in my case QM is active. Guide me if i am missing some process.
Thanks,
Deven

Hi
Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate
this error is due to
You have maintained QM view--> target QM system.
Say ISO :9001
But in QI01 -->Qinfo record you have maintained existing QM sytem say ISO 9002
or
In vendor master you have maintained some other QM system
If there is difference in Vendor master or QM view & QInfo record ...then while creating PO this error will occure.
Maintain same QM system or remove.
Regards
Sujit

Similar Messages

QA System inadequate

hi
While creating Purchase order , "Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate" error message observed. Since I have maintained quality procurement data active, with QM control key 0005.Also maintained certificate type and target QM system. Inspection type 01 material master... Vendor info record , QA info record created.
What else to be maintained?
Please let me know
Thanks and regards

Dear,
Please refer this link,
[ QA System inadequate|Problem in PO]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Nov 28, 2008 4:36 PM

Vendor's/manufacturer's QM system validity

Hi Team,
How to increase Vendor's/manufacturer's QM system validity date?
ERROR: While creating PO is as below.
Vendor's/manufacturer's QM system only valid to 06.05.2010
Message no. QB301
Diagnosis
The quality assurance system of the chosen vendor/manufacturer is no longer valid. You cannot, therefore, order the material concerned from this vendor/manufacturer.
Thanks

It seems vendor/Material QM info record date is past .Go to transaction QI02 ,Check the date in inspection control tab and change the date to valid date.

Vendor's/manufacturer's QM system only valid to 06.05.2010

Hi Team,
Please help how to correct following error.
Vendor's/manufacturer's QM system only valid to 06.05.2010
Message no. QB301
Diagnosis
The quality assurance system of the chosen vendor/manufacturer is no longer valid. You cannot, therefore, order the material concerned from this vendor/manufacturer.
Thanks

Hi
Check Quality Info record for the material-vendor-plant in tcode QI02. Check the date entered in the tab Insp control.
Either Existing QM system date is past or Vendor's QM system date is past.
If vendor's QM system is past, change the date in vendor master.
regards

Debliery Units : VENDOR IS NOT DEFINED FOR THIS SYSTEM

Dear Experts,
In prespective modeler , tried creating 'DELIVERY UNITS'. However get error message
"CANNOT CREATE DELIVERY UNIT AS CONTENT VENDOR IS NOT DEFINED FOR THIS SYSTEM" ?
How can we maintain CONTENT VENDOR ? we are using in-house HANA installation.
Regards
Prashant

Hi Shrikant,
Please do not reply with your same question in all of the threads which are answered.
What is the version you are using?
Where exactly you are unable to see?
Once you edited the field as mentioned by Jody, it will be in green circle. Also while creating the package, you can see this DU as shown below:
Regards
Raj

Vendor Replication and Different Back-end Systems

Hello,
Currently, we have vendor replication were the vendor number from the back-end is used in SRM-EBP. Now, we want add another back-end but there are vendor number conflicts. Is there a way to configure it so that the new back-end replicaition generates new numbers in SRM-EBP?
Honestly, there should be a cleansing and alignment of vendor numbers between the two back-end systems. However, that is big task that the organization doea not want to take on at this time.
Has anyone encounter this issue and how did you resolve it?
Regards, Dean.
Edited by: Dean Hinson on Feb 3, 2010 3:26 PM

Hi,
You can find option "If R/3 number assignment is not possible: Internal number assignment" in the bottom of BBPGETDV transaction screen.
Regards,
Masa

Automatic Replication of Vendors from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System

Hi All,
I am searching for any existing standard configuration in SRM V 4.0 System for replicating Vendors of selected Purchasing Organizations from SAP R/3 Backend System to SRM System.
I have checked in the SPRO settings of SRM System and found/could make out from the documentation avalable in help itself, that there is a standard configuration by which you can automatically replicate the Vendors created in SAP R/3 by activating the following in SPRO: By putting a tick mark against the Check Box existing against "Create New Vendors also" under Vendor Synchronization with Make Global Settings I hope.
If the above statement is correct, then I hope we have to schedule a job ,since the above configuration is based on a job based execution which should run at least once a day.
In that case,which would be the relevant job which has to be created WITH A VARIANT in order to filter the Purchasing Organizations desired for.
Please help me out since we have to implement this asap.And if the above solution is not at all feasible,then please do reply at the earliest.
Awaiting for your early reply .
Regards
Annette

Hi
Please try this ->
<b>http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/56/54f137a5e6740ae10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/bb/6c0e3b02616a42e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/62/fb7d3cb7f58910e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/5e/88ef3bc8821d0de10000000a114084/frameset.htm</b>
Regards
- Atul

Vendor Master Replication from 2 Backend System

Hi Experts,
I am facing a problem in replicating the vendor masters from two Different Logical ECC systems.
The vendor master at 1st Backend system
Vendor Master: 0011000196
Company Code: C001
Pur.Organization: P001
The vendor Master at 2nd Backend system
Vendor Master: 0011000196
Company Code: 1000
Pur.Organization: 1000
In BBPGETVD, the vendor from 1st backend system is replicated successfully and available in VENMAP table. Again, I entered the same vendor code and change the 2nd Backend destination in BBPGETVD and clicked on start transfer , In SLG1 i could find the error as below
"Error: The Vendor Number Exists as a Partner Number Vendor: 0011000196”.
In VENMAP table for the above vendor there is only one entry for the 1st logical system alone.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks& Regards,
Ramprakash N

If it is the same vendor - it must have the same address in both backends.
After that you should be able to start BBPGETVD with following checkbox activated.
Then VENMAP should be extended automatically.
Regards
Konstantin

Catalog vendor having different vendor number in different R/3 system

Hello Experts,
We are in SRM 7.0 classic scenario and we are facing an issue as described below:-
We are using a punched out catalog which has different venor number in different backend system.We have 2 R/3 backend system say R/3 sys1 & R/3 sys2.
Vendor No for the Catalog vendor is say:-
Vendor No     R/3 sys
V123              R/3 sys1
V567              R/3 sys2
We have connected the R/3 sys2 just a week back.We have replicated the catalog vendor number V567 from R/3 sys2 into SRM system and we are able to successfully create a Shopping cart in R/3 sys2 using catalog.
However,we are facing a problem and the problem is that,
When we create a shopping cart in R/3 sys2 using catalog,by default we get a message that "Vendor V123 is not intended for plant"
We are able to change the vendor from V123 to V567 in the portal,but we are unable to understand why the vendor V123 is picked up as a default catalog vendor.
Can you all experts,plz help us understand why this vendor V123 is picked up as default vendor and how we can ensure that Vendor V123 is picked up when we are creating SHC is system R/3 sys1 & vendor V567 is picked up as default vendor when we are creating SHC in system R/3 sys2?
Any pointers will be highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
RKS

Hello RKS,
>
RKS_Jsr wrote:
> (...)
> Can you all experts,plz help us understand why this vendor V123 is picked up as default vendor and how we can ensure that Vendor V123 is picked up when we are creating SHC is system R/3 sys1 & vendor V567 is picked up as default vendor when we are creating SHC in system R/3 sys2?
>(...)
This means for same Product Category (and same material ID) coming from your Punch-Out catalog, you can create a Purchase Requisition in R/3 sys1 OR R/3 sys2 ?
If i am correct, how can you manage in your catalog two vendor numbers for same Product Category (and material ID) ?
I guess only one vendor number (V123) is maintained in your catalog. That's why, even if your management rule is to send your SC to R/3 sys2, you will have always vendor V123 as the default one, as it is the only one in your catalog...
Regards.
Laurent.

Problem in PO

hi friends
when i m trying to create the PO
I m getting the following error
1) Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate
Kindly mail me the solution
Urgent Please

Hello Ajit,
The error may be due to the program error. Look at the correction instructions given in SAP Note <a href="https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=536176&nlang=EN&smpsrv=https%3a%2f%2fwebsmp103%2esap-ag%2ede">536176</a>.
Below I am giving you the detail of that note.
Summary
Symptom
When you create a purchase order, the system displays error message 06873 ("Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate"), although the quality management is not active in the procurement for the corresponding material.
Other terms
ME21, ME21N, ME22N, ME23N, SAPMM06E, MEPO, purchase order, QM, QSSYS, procurement data, QM procurement active, target QM system, QM system, 06873, quality inspection
Reason and Prerequisites
This is caused by a program error.
Solution
See the correction instructions.
Thanks
Murtuza

Cannot approve PO

Hi,
While creating PO for vendor- cannot approve PO....i am getting error message -
Vendor or manufacturer's QA system inadequate
Thanks

Dear Robinson,
I think you are facing missing functionality if you received the message mentioned.
'No inspection lot' of Q-Info record for HU-managed materials can be carry out.
Please try using enhancement QAAT0001.
Best regards,
Loke Foong

The system extension "/Library/Frameworks/PrivateTunnel.framework/Versions/Current/Extensions/tap.ke xt" was installed improperly and cannot be used. Please try reinstalling it, or contact the product's vendor for an update.

My MacBookPro freezes and i have to force shut it down and restart.
It then gives me these errors...
The system extension “/Library/Frameworks/PrivateTunnel.framework/Versions/Current/Extensions/tun.ke xt” was installed improperly and cannot be used. Please try reinstalling it, or contact the product’s vendor for an update.
The system extension “/Library/Frameworks/PrivateTunnel.framework/Versions/Current/Extensions/tap.ke xt” was installed improperly and cannot be used. Please try reinstalling it, or contact the product’s vendor for an update.
What does this mean? How can I fix it so it doesn't freeze again.
(All software up to date)

hello,
I have the same problem. does anyone have any ideas on what's going on and or how to fix it.
Thanks!!
Luis

In MIRO,more than one PO with different vendors than also system is posting

Dear All,
When in MIRO, vendor invoice is posting with reference to more than one PO's and if vendors are different in PO's then also system is posting vendor invoice and in this case, system is considering vendor of first mentioned PO and posting the document. This is error found to be in factory business process and need to be controlled immediately, otherwise any repercussions can be faced in future.
Can anyone advice how to control this.
Thanks
Madhukar Mittal

Hi,
The system will take over the invoicing party from the first PO and
ignore the invoice party from other POs.
You can see it in Detail tab in MIRo (or in MIR4). This is standard funktionality.
Please check the information from the following notes.
393431
458692
Best regards
Erika

Manufacturer plant Partner not defaulting in PO

hi all
according to SAP Help, the setting for checking manufacturer plants are supposed to be the following:
1) Vendor with account group001 and partner roles LF
2) Manufacturer with account group MNFR which, unless I am missing something, allows partner role MN only(no connection to main vendor???) and manufacturer plants in partner tab, with partner role MN
3) Manufacturer plant(s) with account group MNFR, partner role MN (manufacturer plant) to be entered in the Manufacturer partner tab (see point 2).
the system is supposed to check the plants at PO creation but this is not happening: it does only if the vendor is also the manufacturer and i enter the plants directly in the vendor master.
Also, assuming I am entering the manufacyturer in the partner roles of the vendor master, the manufacturer plants defined in the manufacturer master record, are not defaulted in the PO.
all the settings in Custmizing are checked: schemes, asignments to PO etc.
I also checked Notes but could not find something suitable....i might have missed something tho.
any ideas?

Open personal settings of TCD ME21N/22N/23N and select Display key in box. Save.
Log out and log in again. and open PO.
This is showing because, your personal settings are made to show description.
Raghavan

Customized manufacturer driver cant be updated.

Hello, my computer is a HP p6642f with windows 7 64 bit OS.  I need to update my graphics card for gaming, I have tried updating my graphics card from HP but the version my computer came with is the most recent version that HP provides, 8.15.10.2119 dated 20/04/2010. I dont know exactly what graphics card I have, my dxdiag says;
System
System Information
Current Date/Time: December-26-12 7:07:40 pm
Computer Name: OWNER-HP
Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7600)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Hewlett-Packard
System Model: p6642f
BIOS: 7/12/10 14:03:04 Ver: 6.12
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) I5 CPU 650 @ 3.20GHz (4 CPUs), ~3.2GHz
Memory: 6144MB RAM
Page File: 6649MB used, 5106MB available
DirectX Version: DirextX 11
Display
Device
Name: Intel(R) HD Graphics
Manufacturer: Intel Corporation
Chip Type: Intel(R) HD Graphics (Core I5)
DAC Type: Internal
Approx. Total memory: 1760 MB
Current Display Mode: 1680 x 1050 (32 Bit) (59 Hz)
Monitor: generic PnP Monitor
Drivers
Main Driver: igdum64.dll,igd10um64.dll,igdumd>
Version: 8.15.10.2119
Date: 20/04/10 9:18:38 PM
WHQL Logo'd: n/a
DDI Version: 10
Driver Model WDDM 1.1
What I need to know is what graphics card I have, what the most recent update is that will be compatible, and how to install the new version over the Customized manufacturer driver. Any help will be greatly appreciated. I received 2 games for christmas, DOOM 3 BFG Edition and Medal of Honor Warfighter Limited Edition. Neither will run and I suspect that updating my graphics card may fix both problems. When I try to load DOOM 3 BFG Edition I get the message:
'Unable to initialize OpenGl' followed by;
QA Timing INIT: 000124ms
D3BFG 1.1400 win-x86 Nov 9 2012 10:38:21
3192 MHz Intel CPU with MMX & SSE & SSE2 & SSE3 & HTT
5872 MB System Memory
-1284 MB Video Memory
Winsock Initialized
Found interface: {F9AFD013-48F7-493D-9C22-4B7CE725EA9F} Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport Adapter - 0.0.0.0 NULL netmask - skipped
Found interface: {79F8D309-CA49-4F2A-91FB-E5E15A263ED0} Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller - 192.168.0.43/255.255.255.0
Found interface: {C4E9EFF8-DC43-4D3A-BD95-6E8012AB6738} 802.11n Wireless LAN Card - 0.0.0.0 NULL netmask - skipped
Sys_InitNetworking: adding loopback interface
doom using MMX & SSE for SIMD processing
enabled Flush-To-Zero mode
enabled Denormals-Are-Zero mode
------ Initializing File System ------
Loaded resource file _common.resources
Loaded resource file _ordered.resources
Loaded resource file _sound_pc.resources
Loaded resource file _sound_pc_gr.resources
Reading resource CRCs...
Current search path:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Steam\steamapps\common\DOOM 3 BFG Edition/base
C:\Users\owner\Saved Games\id Software\DOOM 3 BFG/base
file system initialized.
WARNING: Unable to open resource file maps/_startup.resources
----- Initializing Decls -----
Couldn't open journal files
execing default.cfg
couldn't exec D3BFGConfig.cfg
couldn't exec autoexec.cfg
----- R_InitOpenGL -----
Initializing OpenGL subsystem with multisamples:0 stereo:0 fullscreen:1
...registered window class
...registered fake window class
...initializing QGL
...calling LoadLibrary( 'opengl32' ): succeeded
X..WGL_EXT_swap_control_tear not found
display device: 0
DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1
DeviceString: Intel(R) HD Graphics
StateFlags : 0x8000005
DeviceID    : PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0042&SUBSYS_2A9C103C&REV_18
DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{A8527AB9-54FB-49BE-BF2F-02D86CE8A950}\0000
      DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1\Monitor0
      DeviceString: Generic PnP Monitor
      StateFlags : 0x3
      DeviceID    : MONITOR\HWP2654\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
      DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
          dmPosition.x      : 0
          dmPosition.y      : 0
          dmBitsPerPel      : 32
          dmPelsWidth       : 640
          dmPelsHeight      : 480
          dmDisplayFlags    : 0x0
          dmDisplayFrequency: 59
...calling CDS: ok
display device: 0
DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1
DeviceString: Intel(R) HD Graphics
StateFlags : 0x8000005
DeviceID    : PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0042&SUBSYS_2A9C103C&REV_18
DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{A8527AB9-54FB-49BE-BF2F-02D86CE8A950}\0000
      DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1\Monitor0
      DeviceString: Generic PnP Monitor
      StateFlags : 0x3
      DeviceID    : MONITOR\HWP2654\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
      DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
          dmPosition.x      : 0
          dmPosition.y      : 0
          dmBitsPerPel      : 32
          dmPelsWidth       : 1280
          dmPelsHeight      : 720
          dmDisplayFlags    : 0x0
          dmDisplayFrequency: 60
...created window @ 0,0 (1280x720)
Initializing OpenGL driver
...SetPixelFormat failed
Shutting down OpenGL subsystem
...wglMakeCurrent( NULL, NULL ): failed
...releasing DC: failed
...resetting display
...shutting down QGL
...unloading OpenGL DLL
Initializing OpenGL subsystem with multisamples:0 stereo:0 fullscreen:1
...initializing QGL
...calling LoadLibrary( 'opengl32' ): succeeded
X..WGL_EXT_swap_control_tear not found
display device: 0
DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1
DeviceString: Intel(R) HD Graphics
StateFlags : 0x8000005
DeviceID    : PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0042&SUBSYS_2A9C103C&REV_18
DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{A8527AB9-54FB-49BE-BF2F-02D86CE8A950}\0000
      DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1\Monitor0
      DeviceString: Generic PnP Monitor
      StateFlags : 0x3
      DeviceID    : MONITOR\HWP2654\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
      DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
          dmPosition.x      : 0
          dmPosition.y      : 0
          dmBitsPerPel      : 32
          dmPelsWidth       : 1680
          dmPelsHeight      : 1050
          dmDisplayFlags    : 0x0
          dmDisplayFrequency: 59
...calling CDS: ok
display device: 0
DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1
DeviceString: Intel(R) HD Graphics
StateFlags : 0x8000005
DeviceID    : PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_0042&SUBSYS_2A9C103C&REV_18
DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Video\{A8527AB9-54FB-49BE-BF2F-02D86CE8A950}\0000
      DeviceName : \\.\DISPLAY1\Monitor0
      DeviceString: Generic PnP Monitor
      StateFlags : 0x3
      DeviceID    : MONITOR\HWP2654\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
      DeviceKey   : \Registry\Machine\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e96e-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0002
          dmPosition.x      : 0
          dmPosition.y      : 0
          dmBitsPerPel      : 32
          dmPelsWidth       : 1280
          dmPelsHeight      : 720
          dmDisplayFlags    : 0x0
          dmDisplayFrequency: 60
...created window @ 0,0 (1280x720)
Initializing OpenGL driver
...SetPixelFormat failed
Shutting down OpenGL subsystem
...wglMakeCurrent( NULL, NULL ): failed
...releasing DC: failed
...resetting display
...shutting down QGL
...unloading OpenGL DLL
Unknown command 'vid_restart'
Unable to initialize OpenGL
Shutting down OpenGL subsystem
...shutting down QGL
And when I try to load Medal of Honor Warfighter Limited Edition I get a window saying:
'DirectX device creation error' followed by;
Failed creating D3D device of at least version 10.0 on adapter "Intel(R) HD Graphics" with driver "Unknown". Error is DXGI_ERROR_UNSUPORTED ("Unsuported.").
This is typically casued by not having the minimum required DirectX support in the GPU.
For NVIDIA GPUs, DirectX 10.0 support is required.
For AMD and GPUs from other vendors, DirectX 10.1 support is required.
Ok, for Medal of Honor Warfighter it says my graphics processor doesnt support DirectX 10.1, but the fact is I have direct X 11 which contains everything that DirectX 10.1 contains. So I assume that DirectX or Medal of Honor Warfighter is looking at the name of my video card, comparing it to a list of compatable cards, my card having been customized by the manufacturer is not on the list, and so it refuses to try to load DirectX or Medal of Honor Warfighter? I dont know, if there is some other way to correct the problem that would be great, but I'd really like to update my video card. I have heard that updating a customized manufacturer driver can casue instability, but i'm willing to take the risk. If I cant get a solution to my problem here, I'd like to at least know what my graphics card model is other than just 'Intel(R) HD Graphics (core I5)' so that I can continue searching on my own.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Well, yes and no... the card requires 2 "physical slots" but only connects to one "electrical slot"... the PCIe x16 slot. Your computer has 5 expansion slots... one PCIe x16 slot, three PCIe x1slots, and a mini-PCIe x1 slot. The mini-PCIe x1 slot hosts the factory wireless card and it appears the the other four slots are empty. The GTX 550 Ti card would connect to the PCIe x16 slot and cover or hide the adjacent PCIe x1 slot. This is normal and designed to work like that. It just requires that the adjacent slot is empty.
Frank
{------------ Please click the "White Kudos" Thumbs Up to say THANKS for helping.
Please click the "Accept As Solution" on my post, if my assistance has solved your issue. ------------V
This is a user supported forum. I am a volunteer and I don't work for HP.
HP 15t-j100 (on loan from HP)
HP 13 Split x2 (on loan from HP)
HP Slate8 Pro (on loan from HP)
HP a1632x - Windows 7, 4GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
HP p6130y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
HP p6320y - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240
HP p7-1026 - Windows 7, 6GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6450
HP p6787c - Windows 7, 8GB RAM, NVIDIA GT 240

Vendor's or manufacturer's QA system inadequate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for