Verizon FIOS Intermitte​nt Packet Loss Problem - How to Convince Verizon Support it's NOT ME

Hi,
I have been having a problem with Verizon FIOS Internet AND Phone since Thursday afternoon.
Basically I have intermittent outages several times a day of 15-40 seconds where my download doesn't work, but upload still does. This happens on BOTH my phone and internet. Therefore it's not my router or computer equipment causing the problem.
Here's what happens:
- On the internet: I have a periodic download problem where I can receive no data for about 15 - 40 seconds. After that it returns to normal
- On the phone: If I'm on the phone at the same time then during that period of internet loss I also can not hear anything that the person I am talking to says. However they can hear me just fine (ie. download only problem)
I have been talking to Verizon technical support and they have blamed my router and ONT. I have tried switching off the router, and using a different one. Also they have replaced the ONT twice.
* This problem occurs on BOTH the phone and internet at the same time. This clearly suggests the problem is not in my own house.
In fact I know exactly where the problem lies. I did a traceroute to google below:
Tracing route to google.com [74.125.113.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
  1     4 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  192.168.1.1
  2     5 ms     4 ms     4 ms  L300.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-122.verizon-gni.net [74.105.157.1]
  3     9 ms     8 ms     7 ms  G2-0-0-1822.NWRKNJ-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net [130.81.133.156]
  4    11 ms     8 ms     7 ms  P15-0.NWRKNJ-LCR-07.verizon-gni.net [130.81.30.148]
  5     9 ms     6 ms     7 ms  so-5-0-0-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.8]
  6     7 ms     6 ms     7 ms  0.so-7-0-0.XL3.EWR6.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.177]
  7     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms  0.so-1-0-1.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
  8     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms  TenGigE0-6-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.41]
  9    33 ms    31 ms    35 ms  google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
 10     8 ms    11 ms    10 ms  209.85.252.215
 11    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms  209.85.249.11
 12    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms  209.85.241.222
 13    30 ms    29 ms    29 ms  209.85.241.207
 14    41 ms    39 ms    34 ms  209.85.243.1
 15    27 ms    27 ms    29 ms  vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]
Trace complete.
Then I pinged each device for hops 2-4. When the problem occurs the first one in the hop - 74.105.157.1 - runs fine. The second device - 130.81.133.156 - times out, and all other devices further down the chain time out. This clearly suggest that the device:
130.81.133.156 has major problems.
I have mentioned this to tech support, but they have no way for me to send them logs. Apparently the support technicians at Verizon can not be trusted with even the most basic of tools like email and the web. They also shield me from the NT (Network technician), who is so special that even the tech support guys are only allowed to text chat with him, not actually talk to him. I have enough logs here to clearly show what the problem is.
The latest from tech support is that they are sending yet another guy by my house tomorrow to witness this problem firsthand. Then he will call support that will text chat with the NT, and MAYBE they'll start thinking it's not me.
My main question here is: "How do I get Verizon to believe it really could be a problem in their own network?"
Here are some threads from last year that explain exactly the same problem I'm having. So it wasn't just me:
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-TV-Technical-Ass​istance/Verizon-FIOS-intermittent-connection-drops​...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Intermi​ttent-Network-Timeouts/m-p/28138
One person said Verizon finally fixed it by replacing a PON card. I'm not sure if this is the same problem as that though.
I am an avid Starcraft player and this is driving me crazy because I am getting dropped from my games all the time. Also phone conversations suck when there's these big lags where I can't hear who I'm talking to.
I have had Verizon FIOS internet for 3 years now and this is the first problem I've ever had with it. But I'm starting to get majorly frustrated at how long it's taking to resolve the problem.
Here is a sample of the ping logs I was talking about for different devices all at the same time.
Device 2 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Device 3 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=253
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
Device 4 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Any help, thoughts, suggestions, etc would be great appreciated!
~David

I understand your logic, but you have not eliminated 74.105.157.1 as the problem.  It could be allowing packets out, like outside callers hearing you, but not allow them back in. Since you have results pinging out, trying ping back in. Use this packet loss tool.  You do not need to catch it when it's not working because this tool will ping your IP address (and all the hops in between) for up to 7 days. You will easily see when packet loss is occurring.
If it can successfully ping 74.105.157.1 when the problem occurrs, then 130.81.133.156 is not the issue. This may not help dealing with the personalities at Verizon, but it will help definitively knowing which device is the issue.

Similar Messages

  • ME3600 packet loss problem - reboot to fix.

    One of our ME3600 units has developed a problem where we would lose IPv6 Neighbours and OSPFv3 neighbours, followed by the device not passing MPLS traffic. IPv4 traffic suffering bad packet loss.
    I discovered that devices attached to the Gigabit ports were receiving errored frames so the ME3600 seemed to be sending out bad frames.
    rebooting the device would fix it for a while but it kept happening at regular intervals, usually when the box was carrying more ipv6 traffic.
    We have upgraded to the latest firmware which did not help, and performed a full hardware replacement from Cisco only to find we are still seeing the same issue!
    there was no configuration change that I could point as being a catalyst for the problem, the most recent thing was enabling ipv6 VRFs, but IPv6 is also carried in the global table while we move some services around.po
    Has anyone else experienced similar problems with the ME3600?

    This sounds very similar to a problem we have seen across multiple boxes.
    I've not noticed whether OSPFv3 neighcors drop, however have seen MPLS stop forwarding and heavy v4 loss.  Control plane for v4 seems to stay up (ie v4 OSPF neighbors keep their adjacany) so routes still advertised etc.  Performing a shut / no shut of one of the core interfaces will generally result in a complete failure of the interfaces on that ASIC (the two 10G ports in our case) - can't ping adjacent devices after the no shut, but the GE ports still work.
    10G ports are core facing on our boxes, and adjacent neighbors see increasing input errors when the issue occurs.
    Issue has only been seen during peak traffic times.  Reboot fixes the problem.
    Did you find any resolution?  We've been pointed at CSCui23725, and advised to use the command "platform acl egress-disable".  This appears to be working so far.

  • Packet loss problems with the CSS

    Hi All,
    I have a CSS 11503 with 2 interfaces, one connecting to the firewall and one to the server vlan 203. Some server traffic bypass the content rules based on the ACL on the CSS whereas some traffic is load balanced. Continous pings to the server on vlan 203 is consistently loosing packets.
    I was able to confirm that it is not the firewall that is causing this. How do I troubleshoot this problem?

    capture sniffer trace in front of CSS and on the back of the CSS simultanously.
    See where the packet is lost.
    Gilles.

  • Security and packet loss problem

    Guys,
    I'm using WRTP54G-NA and I have 2 problems with it...
    First one: is about security, if I access direclty http://192.168.0.1/admin/voice or any other subfolder it doesn't ask me the password...
    The other problem is that I can't let my connetion 100%, It always has packet loss, in both way, wired and wireless (more in wireless), I had already tried to fix the Negotiation to 100Mbps Full duplex, changed the MTU values for different values and there is always packet loss...
    I tried to plug my pc directly to the cable modem and it works perfectly...
    I'm using firmware version 3.1.24, I also tried with 3.1.27, but with 3.1.27 the number of problem increases including now ones...
    Any advice ??
    http://brunozp.com || http://brunozp.com.br
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I don't think that the rotuer will ask you for username & pasword once you login to setup page ... Only once it will show you the same when you are typing http://192.168.0.1 on the browser address bar ...

  • Verizon FIOS, Time Capsule, and Airport Express - How to Extend Network

    OK, I just got Verizon FIOS (TV, Internet, and phone). Don't care for the wireless router that is required to be used with it (want 802.11n and Time Capsule). I turned of the wireless on the Verizon FIOS router and installed a Time Capsule in Bridge Mode, which is how the Verizon rep told me to install it. As I understand it, the Verizon FIOS router is still handling DHCP, NAT, etc. I would like to extend the wireless network to reach some dead spots in my house. I have read that the Airport Express can be used to extend a wireless network from an Airport Extreme or Time Capsule, but it appears that I need to set up a WDS with the Time Capsule as the base station, which is apparently not possible on the Time Capsule in Bridge Mode. I am desperately seeking any advice on how to use Verizon FIOS, my Time Capsule, and extend the wireless network to reach the farther corners of the house. I am using a Macbook and a Thinkpad as well as an iPhone on the wireless network with a Dell desktop connected to the Time Capsule via Ethernet. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Before I switched, I had Cox Cable with a Buffalo wireless router and it had great range. Now I seem to be in a worse situation from a wireless perspective with higher TV and Internet quality. Thanks in advance.

    Welcome to the discussions!
    +I would like to extend the wireless network to reach some dead spots in my house. I have read that the Airport Express can be used to extend a wireless network from an Airport Extreme or Time Capsule, but it appears that I need to set up a WDS with the Time Capsule as the base station, which is apparently not possible on the Time Capsule in Bridge Mode+
    If you have an AirPort Express(n), you can configure it to "extend a wireless network". This is a more efficient way to add additional wireless coverage (and much easier to configure than a WDS arrangement).
    However, if you have an older "b/g" AirPort Express, you must use the WDS configuration method with this device and the Time Capsule if you want to increase your wireless coverage.

  • How to convince Apple Support of faulty iPod?

    I have some Problems with the battery life of my touch.
    1. sometimes my touch won't charge the battery, even if it shows the battery charging symbol on the ipod. have to unplug an replug it several times, problem is since it is always stating that the battery is being charged i have to check an hour later or so if it really charged my ipod.
    2. the battery indicator does weird stuff. today for example the indicator showed like 80% charged… i plugged the ipod in, unplugged it 5 mins later and the battery went down to like 20%.
    3. sometimes battery is drained from 100% to 10% in half an hour, other times it lasts as long as it should…
    these are problems i can't reproduce - they just happen! so i sent the ipod to apple to have a look at it. they sent it back without having done anything, but a reset. said they couldn't find a problem. i know they have software to check the hardware and stuff, but i'm not making this up in my mind.

    Echoing Mrtotes, another great way to document is video the event. Most cell phones will allow small video recording, a camcorder or some small digital cameras allow for recording, my Olympus does this, had to use it to film a window leak on new construction and everyone thought I was nuts until I showed the video, then utter silence from the window manufacturer, the contractor, etc. When you charge the iPod, film what you're doing, show the battery level prior to charging and after. You may have already thought of this, but is it possible your cable for the iPod to charge or the USB connected is bad, thus robbing you of charging, that happened with several of the cigarette lighter chargers.
    Hope you get it resolved.

  • Consistent packet loss just a few hops into Verizon's network

    I have had consistent packet loss just a few hops into Verizon's network for some time. I have tried the normal things like rebooting routers and releasing my ip address but none of that helps. Most routes do not have an issue, but there is one particular service in Verizon's network which I have issues with, and it happens to be the server that Verizon routes me through when I am gaming online.
    The server is : G0-3-3-6.RCMDVA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.191.80) and I average around 50% packet loss each night. It is just the second hop into my route:
    1) My Router Internal IP
    2) L100.RCMDVA-VFTTP-16.verizon-gni.net (98.117.88.1) with a ping of 9 and 0 packet loss
    3) G0-3-3-6.RCMDVA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.191.80)  with a ping of 15 and 50-80% packet loss.
    How can I get Verizon to stop routing me through this troublesome server? If I look at the route to goggle.com for example, I don't go through that server and there is no packet loss at all.

    mrballcb wrote:
    Since it's a congested link, you also should be aware that ICMP (what ping and traceroute use) become nearly useless for determining packet loss.  A router backplane assigns a grade to every packet that wants to cross from one network connection to another, and ICMP typically is assigned low grade/value.  So when a router is congested and needing to drop packets, ICMP is one of the first ones to get dropped.  Less than 1% of your TCP traffic may be having problems, but ICMP failure might be greater than 50%.  Find a traceroute program that can use TCP to do the traceroute for more accurate results.  I'm not a Windows guy, so I have no clue what programs you have which can do this.
    On my Linux/Unix computer, I use tcptraceroute
    On a Windows computer, you need to download and install tracetcp.
    If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

  • How to get Verizon FiOS SDK?

    HI Folks, I'm trying to get Verizon FiOS SDK. Here's the link: https://www22.verizon.com/fiosdeveloper/General/Login.aspx
    It doesn't say where to sign up so I asked support (using contact us form), but haven't got any response for over 2 days now.
    Does anyone know how to get FiOS SDK?
    Thanks,
    GT

    I am sorry to hear about your frustrations accessing the site. It is still in beta right now. I have sent you a private message.
    Anthony_VZ
    **If someones post has helped you, please acknowledge their assistance by clicking the red thumbs up button to give them Kudos. If you are the original poster and any response gave you your answer, please mark the post that had the answer as the solution**
    Notice: Content posted by Verizon employees is meant to be informational and does not supersede or change the Verizon Forums User Guidelines or Terms or Service, or your Customer Agreement Terms and Conditions or plan

  • How do I fix 100% packet loss?

    I have an 8mb connect but i roughly get like 4-5mb. I think i have the homehub version 1 or 1.5.
    When i search for servers on Counter Strike Source and team fortress the whole interenet just resets and no servers found. I posted on the steam forums and they said it wass to do with packet loss.
    I tried to test for packet loss on http://freeola.com/line-test/ and it says i have 100% packet loss then i tried on http://pingtest.net/ and it was unable to test for packet loss.
    How do i fix 100% packet loss?

    matrixrory wrote:
    I have an 8mb connect but i roughly get like 4-5mb. I think i have the homehub version 1 or 1.5.
    When i search for servers on Counter Strike Source and team fortress the whole interenet just resets and no servers found. I posted on the steam forums and they said it wass to do with packet loss.
    I tried to test for packet loss on http://freeola.com/line-test/ and it says i have 100% packet loss then i tried on http://pingtest.net/ and it was unable to test for packet loss.
    How do i fix 100% packet loss?
    Hi. Welcome to the forums.
    I tried both, and the freeola one failed with 100% packet loss, but the pingtest site returned 0% packet loss.
    I expect the former is being blocked by firewall/router as expected.
    Seems like they aren't quite doing the same thing.
    http://www.andyweb.co.uk/shortcuts
    http://www.andyweb.co.uk/pictures

  • WRT1900AC packet loss

    I never thought upgrading a router and modem would be so much trouble. And every time I work with support for either, they want you to unplug both and let them reset. Maybe the technology today requires that unplugging be done before you want to use the internet? Okay, I bought this high-end router to go along with my Cisco 3010 modem. I fought this setup for 2 weeks, and then got Cox to send a technician out to check my lines. After an hour, we discovered that the modem was putting out the 50Mbs that my service provided. But, the router was only kicking out 15Mbs and having packet loss. I got on here, and used technical help chat to find the settings required to get the 50Mbs coming out of the router now. I don't know why I had to make these manual settings, and go through all that work. But, for now I'll just grit my teeth and say "that's the technology of today". But after a few days, I find that streaming Amazon is not fixed, I still get buffering and poor quality. So, I decided to try and do a ping test, and the report is showing packet loss. How do I fix this, in simple terms? If I knew it took a technician to come out and set this router up in the first place, I can assure you I wouldn't have spent $200+ on this device! If I can't get this router working top-notch today, it's going back and I'll buy another brand ASAP. I'll gladly take any recommendations for a better model, if you can't help me fix the issues.

    What Firmware version is currently loaded?
    What region are you located? Are you wired or wireless when connected to the router?
    Internet Service Provider and Modem Configurations Check cable between Modem and Router, swap out to be sure. Link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CAT6 is recommended.
    Check ISP MTU requirements, Cable is usually 1500, DSL is around 1492 down to 1472. Call the ISP and ask.
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=88e63d78588142e6bb68e22d7faf2046_Configuring_the_MTU_Settings_of_your_Linksys_Smart_Wi_Fi_rou.xml&pid=80&respid=0&snid=2&dispid=0&cpage=search Router and Wired Configurations
    Setup DHCP reserved IP addresses for all devices ON the router. This ensures each devices gets its own IP address when turned on and connected, eliminates IP address conflicts and helps in troubleshooting and maintain consistency for applications that need to connect as well as mapped drives.
    Ensure devices are set to auto obtain an IP address.
    If http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipv6 is an option on the router, select Local Connection Only. Wireless Configurations
    Ensure the default (linksys) SSID name is changed. Ensure that different SSID names are used between each WiFi 2.4/5Ghz radios for dual band routers. Can be anything and not something that's already in use by any neighbouring WiFi routers.
    What wireless modes are you using?
    Any 2.4Ghz or 5Ghz cordless house phones or WiFi APs near by?
    Any other WiFi routers in the area? Link> Use http://www.techspot.com/downloads/5936-inssider.html to find out. Use v3. How many?
    Router Placement
    Forum User - "Well I feel really dumb. After moving the router away from other electronic devices my speeds are back to normal. Just a heads up for anyone experiencing slow speeds, you might want to move it away from other electronics and see if that helps."
    3-6' feet minimum safe distance between devices.
    Placement on main level floor and central in the building and WELL ventilated is preferred. Not in basements or closets as building materials, or near by electronics devices could interfere or hinder good signal propagation.
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=d9a3b1b2039741948a2365b053a93ea8_3759.xml&pid=80&respid=0&snid=2&dispid=0&cpage=search
    http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/wireless/wireless-basics/31083-smallnetbuilders-wireless-faq-the-essentials
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/GetArticle.aspx?docid=acca9b9008f04a66af818c2ab366001e_Positioning_the_external_antennas_on_the_Linksys_WRT1900AC.xml&pid=80&converted=0 Media Prioritization:
    Enable Media Prioritization
    Enable WMM Support
    Set Downstream\Bandwidth to the maximum value your ISP provides you. ## x 1024=##### value to enter into the Downstream box.
    http://support.linksys.com/en-us/support/ccc/MEDIAPRIORITIZATION

  • Severe packet loss through tinet

    Hi,
    i've just spent the evening trying to track down somone at BT tech support who would/could discuss routing/packet loss problems but with no luck.
    Essentially i'm trying to contact 206.127.158.1 and suffering very heavy packetloss, this seems to be consistent and not just a 6-8pm thing.
    The route has been fine for the past 2 years but began acting up in the last month.  The service at the other end is now pretty much unusable (it's a game, GuildWars2/gw2).
    I'd very much like to know why/if the routing has changed and if there's anything BT can do to fix it.  Other BB providers don't appear to route through the ti-net nodes and don't exhit the problem. 
    help?
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    7 25ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% acc2-10GigE-9-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.228]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    8 37ms 2/ 25 = 8% 2/ 25 = 8% core1-te0-3-0-13.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.152]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    9 31ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% 109.159.252.61
    1/ 25 = 4% |
    10 37ms 4/ 25 = 16% 3/ 25 = 12% 166-49-211-196.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.196]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    11 27ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% 166-49-211-38.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.38]
    3/ 25 = 12% |
    12 49ms 4/ 25 = 16% 0/ 25 = 0% xe-4-0-1.fra23.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.157]
    1/ 25 = 4% |
    13 42ms 20/ 25 = 80% 15/ 25 = 60% 89.149.164.42
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    14 --- 25/ 25 =100% 20/ 25 = 80% 206-127-157-86.plaync.com [206.127.157.86]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    15 44ms 5/ 25 = 20% 0/ 25 = 0% p4-23-c0-ncdc-pub.plaync.net [206.127.158.1]
    Trace complete.

    same problem here BT please read this and do something about tinet. I would phone your customer service but it is so awfull I could not bear it
    2 35ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% 217.47.106.250
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    3 --- 25/ 25 =100% 25/ 25 =100% 217.47.105.161
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    4 42ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% 213.1.69.162
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    5 --- 25/ 25 =100% 25/ 25 =100% 31.55.165.181
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    6 41ms 2/ 25 = 8% 2/ 25 = 8% 31.55.165.107
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    7 102ms 5/ 25 = 20% 5/ 25 = 20% 109.159.250.48
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    8 109ms 5/ 25 = 20% 5/ 25 = 20% core2-te0-13-0-14.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.46]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    9 50ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% peer2-xe3-1-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.254.233]
    2/ 25 = 8% |
    10 52ms 3/ 25 = 12% 1/ 25 = 4% t2c3-xe-0-1-2-0.uk-lon1.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.166]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    11 50ms 5/ 25 = 20% 3/ 25 = 12% 166-49-211-38.eu.bt.net [166.49.211.38]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    12 70ms 2/ 25 = 8% 0/ 25 = 0% xe-4-0-1.fra23.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.181.157]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    13 77ms 20/ 25 = 80% 18/ 25 = 72% 89.149.164.42
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    14 --- 25/ 25 =100% 23/ 25 = 92% 206-127-157-86.plaync.com [206.127.157.86]
    0/ 25 = 0% |
    15 71ms 2/ 25 = 8% 0/ 25 = 0% p4-23-c0-ncdc-pub.plaync.net [206.127.158.1]

  • WRT610N Packet Loss (Again)

    I have been reading through the forums for the past few hours and and have seen others with this problem, but no clear solution.
    I installed my new WRT610N (FW 1.00.18) and I am experiencing packet loss when pinging. When I ping from my laptop to an AT&T DNS Server (4.2.2.2), I get 20-40% packet loss. Also, the average ping time is about 15ms, but on every 5-6th ping, the time jumps to 1600-1900ms (sometimes as high as 3000ms). As an additional test, I also ping the router directly at 192.168.1.1 and I get the same poor results.
    I have verified that the loss is happening between the laptop and the router. When I use the router's built in ping feature, I get good speeds and no packet loss to the same address.
    -I have tried this on both 2.4ghz and 5ghz radios.I disabled each radio to esnure the test.
    -I have tried disabling all security settings on the router (was using WPA2-Personal.
    -I changed the Beacon Interval to 75, Fragmentation Threshold to 2304 and RTS Threshold to 2304 as other posts suggested.
    -I have tried different channels on each radio. 
    -I went back and reinstalled my WRT54g and had no lag or loss.
    I'm really stuck on what to try next. I also have one other small problem. Whenever I make a change to the router settings through the web interface, and I hit SAVE SETTINGS, my laptop loses the wireless connection and I have to re-select my wireless network.
    Has anyone found a solution to what appears to be a somewhat common problem?
    Message Edited by cj415 on 12-31-2008 10:13 AM
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thanks for your help. I tried a hard reset, and then a clean firmware install. The packet loss problem has improved significantly.
    I turned of all security to perform the tests.
    I am still having some problems maintaining a 5GHz connection, but I will try different channels, and going wide, to see if that helps.
    Thanks for your help¡

  • Connecting  AirPort Extreme 802.11n directly to my Verizon FiOS service

    I want to connect my new AirPort Extreme 802.11n directly to my Verizon FiOS service. The ActionTec wireless router supplied by Verizon died, and I bought an AirPort Extreme as a replacement. When I configured the AirPort extreme, it would not connect to the internet. I have read some posts here that indicate I plug my AirPort Extreme into the ActionTec and I am OK, however the ActionTec is dead.
    Are there settings for the AirPort Extreme that are unique for going straight to the internet? What am I missing? My FiOS connection is an Ethernet connection- not coax.
    Here is the interesting thing- I have an old AirPort Extreme (the round cone shaped model) that I plugged into the Verizon FiOS Ethernet connection. Everything works fine- I have a wireless connection to the internet. I didn't set anything. So my assumption is that I can make the new AirPort Extreme work with the Verizon FiOS.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated, as I do not know if I have the strength to go through the Verizon help desk.

    Good news! My problem was solved by calling Verizon FiOS support. The service tech said an AEBS can connect straight to the FiOS Ethernet connection. He broke the "lease" on my connection, had me connect the cable from the wall to my WAN slot, and then he "leased" my network connection to my AEBS. Works like butter now.
    He said that the Verizon FiOS network "leases" the network connections every 24 hours or so, and had I left my AEBS connected to the network, it would have pushed the new setting down to the AEBS.
    Thanks for all of the input.

  • Linksys Wireless Router - Unusable internet and major packet loss

    I installed a Linksys Wireless router at my friend's home and the internet connection is nearly unusable. About 1 in every 10 packets are lost between the router and internet modem. I have replaced this router with a 2 brand new routers of the same make and incurred the same problem (new ethernet cables and new power supplies as well). Even if wireless is disabled on the router, the same problem occurs. Interestingly, I tried a basic non-wireless router and there is no problem whatsoever. Any ideas on what could be causing the wireless routers to not work correctly?

    First, connect your system up:    EUM3005 -- WRT54GS -- computer.  And in the computer, temporarily turn off your software firewall.  Does this correct your packet loss problem?  If not, then power down your system, and proceed with the following tests, and post your results:
    Connect your computer directly to your EUM3005 modem.  (Do not use the WRT54GS for this test.)  Power up your system, and verify that you have a working Internet connection, then do the following:
    In the computer, go to "Start" > All Programs > Accessories > Command Prompt.
    A black DOS box will appear. Type in "ipconfig /all" (with no quotes), then hit the Enter key.   Post all of your results, except post only the first half of your IP address.  To copy the results to your post, highlight the data, then use the copy (Ctrl-c) keys and the paste (Ctrl-v) keys.
    Next, power down your entire system, then connect the WRT54GS to your EUM3005.  Connect your computer to the WRT54GS.  Boot up your system.  Go into the WRT54GS setup menu  (at 192.168.1.1)  and ping the EUM3005.  Did that work?  Next, in the WRT54GS, go to the "Status" tab, "Router" subtab.   Look down the page to the area labeled "Internet", then post the following info from the page:  "Login type", "IP address", "Subnet mask", "Default Gateway", and "Primary DNS"  values, except post only the first half of your IP address.
    Is the IP address the same from both tests?

  • Verizon Fios & NTT Packet loss/Slow Speeds..

    Hello,
    Recently there has been lot of packet loss between NTT and Verizon Fios.
    mtr -rn 108.51.80.12x
    HOST: localhost Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1.|-- 77.247.178.xxx 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 1.2 0.3
    2.|-- 85.159.239.6 0.0% 10 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.0
    3.|-- 85.159.239.29 0.0% 10 0.9 0.9 0.6 2.4 0.5
    4.|-- 81.20.64.113 0.0% 10 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.2 0.1
    5.|-- 129.250.2.146 0.0% 10 1.3 1.3 0.8 3.9 1.0
    6.|-- 129.250.2.144 0.0% 10 96.0 97.5 96.0 108.8 4.0
    7.|-- 129.250.4.207 0.0% 10 92.6 92.7 92.5 93.0 0.1
    8.|-- 129.250.8.38 0.0% 10 144.8 148.0 142.2 164.0 7.1
    | `|-- 129.250.8.34
    9.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    10.|-- 108.51.80.12x 10.0% 10 142.5 143.9 141.2 146.7 2.2
    Anyone else having same issues? I tried contacting support but problem happens offten at night time and is fixed within 6 to 8 hours.
    Thanks

    Hi, wondering if you were ever able to resolve this or get any additional info from Verizon on it?
    I have some customers on FIOS reporting problems to our ec2 servers.   After some a couple nights of debugging I found your post and I have a set of remarkably similar mtr output (also have a similar trace to a 108.x.x.x FIOS endpoint):
    HOST: ip-10-45-5-2xx Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
    1.|-- 100.104.104.1xx 0.0% 10 0.7 1.3 0.7 6.3 1.8
    2.|-- 100.74.169.9 0.0% 10 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.1
    3.|-- 100.74.169.24 0.0% 10 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.6 0.1
    4.|-- 100.66.98.4 0.0% 10 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.0
    5.|-- 100.66.3.190 0.0% 10 1.3 1.3 0.9 1.7 0.2
    6.|-- 100.64.226.55 0.0% 10 1.0 1.4 0.9 2.2 0.4
    7.|-- 100.64.225.182 0.0% 10 1.5 1.3 0.9 2.6 0.5
    8.|-- 100.64.58.100 0.0% 10 0.4 1.2 0.3 5.6 1.8
    9.|-- 100.64.13.89 0.0% 10 1.0 1.3 0.9 2.3 0.4
    10.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    11.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    12.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    13.|-- 100.64.16.1 0.0% 10 0.5 1.4 0.4 7.6 2.2
    14.|-- 205.251.245.43 0.0% 10 6.6 9.8 0.4 66.4 20.4
    15.|-- 205.251.245.46 0.0% 10 0.7 0.9 0.7 1.1 0.1
    16.|-- 205.251.245.0 0.0% 10 1.2 1.1 0.8 1.2 0.1
    17.|-- 168.143.228.37 0.0% 10 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.5 0.0
    18.|-- 129.250.8.38 0.0% 10 46.4 49.8 46.4 52.6 2.2
    | `|-- 129.250.8.34
    19.|-- ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    20.|-- 173.79.220.xxx 10.0% 10 63.1 59.8 53.7 63.1 2.9
    Wondering how to proceed with Verizon, as you mention this only seems to occur during night-time hours, so it's a tricky issue to get support on.  For us it means very slow (1mbps or less) transfer speeds between our servers and the FIOS customer, which is unacceptable. 
    -Tom

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to find out the descendants of one node that has a nameplace

    hello i got a littile trouble when i try to find out the descendants of node which has a nameplace,check this sample code below please. no matter i try to use the node's local name,name,i still got a blank.i am confused about that. do u people know h

  • Triggering an idoc for FI tcodes

    Hi all How to tirgger an idoc for FI transactions for eg F-31.as in SD and MM can we use message control technique to trigger idocs ? Regards Uday

  • Depreciation external  number range

    Hi, I am having one doubt: the depreciation posting always happens with external document number range If the external no range tick is not clicked then the system should take the internal number range. But if the check is not ticked then the system

  • Financial Reporting - Essbase alias issue

    Hi, issue with FR or Essbase. i have two applications. ASO has the same outline with BSO(planning). both of them have same alias table in Arabic. problem is i created two reports(one is copy of the other). RPT1(ASO Datasouce): member1 alias is not di

  • Search on ALV Grid

    Hello ABAPERS!!! I'm a abap jr and I need your help let me explain..... On ALV Grid I added a button on the status menu, this button is for make an "advanced search data" if the data were found I need focus the cursor on the row (only one row). Also