Verizon's Long Term Plan
I am writing to try and save Verizon from themselves. I have had a Verizon Wireless Account for almost as many years as there has been a Verizon Wireless. I used to have four lines but a couple years ago my son decided he wanted an iPhone and at that time Verizon did not have a phone that could compete. I tried to persuade him to stay with Verizon on our Family Plan but he was determined to have the iPhone so he is now and AT&T customer. Even though I was paying for his phone service he was willing to take on the expense of his own account to have the iPhone. Now my daughter wants an iPhone but I was able to convince her that the Android HTC Incredible would be almost as good as the iPhone with better coverage and she could stay on my plan. She agreed to stay with Verizon and was willing to wait for the back ordered Incredible. When I tried to order the phone and upgrade my service I was told I would have to pay retail for the phone ($500.00!) which is not an option for me. I am not due for any "Upgrade" pricing but since I would be changing my plan and, of course, agreeing to a 2 year committment, I assumed that I would at least get a discount on the price of the phone.I was told this would not be the case.
So Verizon is losing my daughter as a customer. I will have to take a hit on my account because my contract goes through 6/02/11. But Verizon will take a bigger hit because my daughter is 27 years old and would have probably continued to be a Verizon customer for the foreseeable future. I am 60 so my foreseeable future is not nearly as long. And I am not sure if I want to stay with Verizon either. I have a land line (unlike my daughter and son) and I do use my cellphone for making calls (which my kids do not do so much) but even though I enjoy the better signal coverage of Verizon I don't enjoy being taken advantage of. I have been a loyal customer but I would like to think that my loyalty was appreciated by Verizon.
Most importantly, I think the short term profit that Verizon may be making on this decision will be far outweighed by the long term losses on the many young customers who are leaving Verizon. I have tried to keep two customers for Verizon but apparently Verizon does not want or need them. I believe that Verizon will someday regret this policy.
I asked to be allowed to do this and I was told I could not. This would have been an acceptable but it was not an option. By the way, the last phone I got from Verizon Wireless (Samsung Convoy) I paid full price on because I was not due for a new phone then either. I bought it to replace an LG phone that had difficult to use voice dialing. The Samsung Convoy was not functioning properly and even though I had paid full price and the defects were apparent soon after I bought it, I had to accept a "refurbished" phone as a replacement. In fact I now am aware that if you buy any Verizon cellphone and it is defective you will recieve a refurb when you get any exchange at all. (And they are pretty sneaky about this process, I might add.)
I'm pretty sure Verizon is doing ok on recouping on their hardware.
Anyway, the point is that I think it is short-sighted for Verizon to be churlish about selling smartphones to previously non-smartphone customers. Just bad business.
Similar Messages
-
Long Term Planning-Planning File Entry
Hi Gurus/Friends
In the long term planning after PIR with inactive version and creating Scenario, assinging versions, Plants,....then
during Release+Save it is giving the Result of Planning File Entries
Logically the system has suppose to give the Number of Planning File Entries in Propotionate to the Specific Planning Scenario number and materials inside
But it is giving for all the Materials inside the Plant
Is there any settings to restrict the Planning File Entry creation w.r.t Planning scenario during Release+Save
other than the solutions through Transaction MS20,MS22 and MSAB
(Because during Release+save logically it has to call the MS22 t.code and do planning file entries for the materials in that scenario)
Awaiting for reply
thanks
K.PrabakaranHi,
Please Refer Below SAP help .
*Releasing a planning scenario*
You first have to release a planning scenario before you can plan it in the long-term planning run. When you release the planning scenario, the system creates planning file entries for all materials in all the plants allocated to the planning scenario. There is a separate planning file entry for this purpose. This guarantees that your operative planning is kept completely separate from your simulative planning. This long-term planning file contains all the materials that are also contained in the operative planning file. After the release, every change relevant to MRP triggers an entry in the planning file as in operative planning.
Pradeep
Edited by: Pradeep Kumar on May 9, 2008 4:22 PM -
Excluding storage location from MRP run in Long Term Planning
Hi,friends,
In my scenario , i want to exclude storage location from MRP run in long term planning.When i set storage location MRP indicator "2" in SPRO and SLoc MRP indicator "1" MRP4 in material master, i can exclude the storage location after run MRP with MD01/MD02,and i can see the expected result in MD04.But in Long Term Planning scenario the storage location can not be excluded after run MRP with MS01/MS02,and the requirements list in MS04 include the stock in the storage location i want to exclude. i dont know if i miss something.Plz give me some advice.
Regards
JoeyHi,
Refer the OSS Note 208017 - LTP: Long-term planning and storage locations
==========================================================================
Symptom
In long-term planning (Transactions MSBT / MS01 / MS02 / MS03), the MRP indicator of a storage location for a material is not taken into account (material master, view MRP 2 [up to and including Release 3.1I] or MRP 4 [as of Release 4.0A]).
The storage locations excluded by MRP or planned separately are also planned in the plant segment.
Additional key words
LTP, MM01, MM02, MM03, master data, MRP indicator, LGORT ...
Cause and prerequisites
The MRP indicator for a certain storage location of a material is only taken into account in operative planning (requirements planning, MRP).
The long-term planning occurs exclusively at plant level.
Solution
This is no error. The system works as intended.
The individual storage locations should not be distinguished in the long-term planning, in order to perform a comprehensive long-term planning.
This is important, for example, within the kanban processing where the storage locations with kanban MRP are excluded from the MRP, but in spite of that should be included in the long-term planning.
==========================================================================
Regards,
Siva -
Extracting LTP (Long Term Planning) Data from SAP ECC to SAP BW
Hello all
Here is the task in hand. There is a standard report that Production Planners execute post their MRP/LTP runs. This report can be accessed through T-code "MCB)". The program in action is RMCB1200. I tried looking for any standard extractors but to no avail. I would be fine to know either or both of the following:
An extractor
All the primary tables involved ( I have found a few tables through the program but a list by some expert will help me understand that I have not missed anything significant)
Also, if anyone has done this before, how was your experience with the extraction in terms of extraction volume and performance.
Regards
GajendraAfter further digging, here is some information that I found out.
T-code
Program
BADI
MSEX
RMDMRPEXTRACT02
MD_SR_LIST_EXTRACT
This could possibly provide the data required. The program can be scheduled and the output can be managed by SPRO settings for Extraction Mode. I am running tests to confirm if it provides me the correct information and matches with MCB) output.
Here are some tables, just for reference:
LTP Tables: PLSC, PBHI, PLPT, MDTP, PLPR, PLPB
MRP Records:
MDKP
MRP Document Header Data
MDTB
MRP Table Structure (no data)
PLSC
Planning Scenario (Long-term Planning)
MDFD
MRP Firming Dates
MDVM
Planning File Entries
S094
LIS -- Stock/Requirements Analysis -
How to consider the Purchase Orders in Long Term Planning
Hi All,
I wanted to include the Purchase Orders of Finished Material in Long Term Planning.
I have selected the check box "Long-term planning: include firmed issues and receipts" in the Planning Scenario but after LTP run system is not considering the Purchase Orders of Finished Materials for Planning.
Regards,
Shailendra
Edited by: Shailendra Hadkar on Apr 5, 2010 12:41 PMDear,
Could you please explain usage of purchase orders for Finished product?
Regards,
SAP CONS -
I need to stock available qty at long term planing (ms05) not calculate some location that qty status nettable.
Example : Location yy stock onhand 100 EA (Nettable)
Location xx stock onhand 10 EA (Nettable)
MRP display stock available 100 ea but
Long Term Planning display stock available 110 ea (I need to display 100 ea same MRP because MRP can set config exclude from MRP)
Please advise me?Hi,
Can you make this Location stock XX as blocked or Restricted stock, then you will be able to exclude it from the Net requirement calculation.
By deselecting the Blocked Stock or Restricted use stock for avaialbile stock in Avaialble stock configuration. -
Implementing Long-Term Planning
Dear Guys,
Is that possible to implement Long-Term Planning (LTP) in SAP when there is no SOP module in the system. Would you please inform me the basic requirements or basic setup to implement LTP in SAP system.
Thank you in advance!Hi Payam,
This is always recommended to implement LTP if you have long lead times for some procured parts, bottle necks in capacities for work centers and most important to plan about budget required for the production of those parts.
The above things you cannot check with STP/MTP and perform changes after the STP/MTP runs. But this you can do with LTP with diffrent scenarios and compare it till you satisfy.
You can do the precosting of the parts and check what would be your future costing and plant budget.
You can transfer the requireemnst of the critical parts to vendors well in advance after LTP run and before running the actual planning for the entire year, so the vendors will be well prepared to supply you the parts.
You can also checks the capacities required for the production before the STP run.
If this is OK then please close this thread.
Regards
TAJUDIN -
Long-Term Planning (PP-MP-LTP)
Do you know BI content for Long-Term Planning (PP-MP-LTP)?
Not that I know.
Often business people actually mean SOP (BC: 0SOP_PLANNING) when talking about long-term planning. I don't see any point in reporting LTP that is more like alternative MRP scenarios. It is operational and different scenarios easily get confusing in reporting.
BR,Tuomas -
Long term planning in ECC for materials planned in SAP APO
Hi SAP PP and APO Experts,
I would like to know whether it is possible to plan a material in SAP ECC with Long Term Planning to create Simulative Planned Orders in ECC, when the MRP Type for the material is set to X0 (Planning in SAP APO).
Warm regards,
PremHi Dhaivakumar,
Appreciate your prompt response.
My business is MTS. I have made all settings for LTP planning for the material. (M|RP Type is set to X0-Planning in APO). When I execute the transaction MS02, I get the error message "Material 5200000013 J310 is not planned automatically. Message no. 61008". The details of the error message is:
The material 5200000013 in plant J310 or in MRP area is not included in automatic MRP because
either the MRP data for plant J310 or MRP area has not been created
or an MRP type has been entered for the material in plant J310 or MRP area that does not allow automatic MRP.
Warm regards,
Prem -
I can't see planned order in Long Term Planning Stock/requirements list.
Hi
I am trying to use Long Term Planning in SAP.
I created scenario dates from 01.03.2011 to 03.09.2011. Between those dates i entered planned independent requirements as 300.
When i went to Long Term Planning Stock/requirements list, i can see all planned independent requirements but i run Multilevel single-item planning and then when i went to Long Term Planning Stock/requirements list again, i couldnt see planned order for planned independent requirements.
So what is the problem? Can anyone help me please?
Thank you.HI
check the planning scenario in MS31 and the PIR assignment in MS31 also check the plant assignement.
Check In MD61 you have enter PIRs in simulation version and the same version is to assigned in planning scenario
Also check T code OPU5 for LTP setting for planned orders
Regards
Anupam Sharma
Edited by: anupam sharma on Sep 3, 2010 2:33 PM -
Inconsistent - Work Centre's Long-term Planning (KAKO-KAPLPL)
Hi Experts,
we're upgarding from SAP4.5 to ERP6.
I reviewed OSS note 950834, but it's not related.
We extracted from SAP4.5 Work Centre - Capacity Header - Long-term
Planning.
It's ticked (X) in CR03, but blank () in table KAKO-KAPLPL.
We loaded into ERP6 Work Centre - Capacity Header - Long-term Planning.
It's blank () in CR03, but ticked (X) in table KAKO-KAPLPL.
Please advise the fix for this issue.
Thanks,
ThomasDear Thomas,
I suggest you to check relevant OSS notes. Also creaete a OSS message for this issue.
thanks and regards
muru -
Hi,
Please suggest how to analyze the output of MCB) transaction for long term planning.
Thanks & Regards,
NatarajHi there,
Could you please give more details such as what are your objectives, the type of material (high frequency demand, low frequency, etc) and the span of long term planning (1 year, 5 years, 10?).
Cheers,
Rodrigo -
Dear All,
I am trying to do Long term Planning. In my case I am not using SOP. Demand is entered into SAP through PIR (i.e. PIR).
I want to see how much load is there on all the resources available.
Please advice me how to proceed in this direction.
Regards,
Vivek SharmaDear Vivek,
Check with these steps,
1.A plannig scenario has to be created for a plant in T code MS31 & for the same Planning scenario
configuration settings has to be made in OPU5 for the planned orders for LTP.
2.Requirements has to be given in MD61 in an inactive version and also after giving the requirements
kindly remove the tick mark against version- active check box.
3.Assign this plan to the planning scenario in MS32,release it and ensure the planning file entries are
entered or created,the same can be checked using MS21.
4.After taking LTP simulation run in MS02(individual material) or MS01 you can see the simulated
planned orders obtained in MS04 T code.
5.These Simulated planned orders can't be converted into production orders or it cant be used for any
business confirmation purpose.
6. For capacity planning analysis,use T Code CM38,
Before that Ensure for all the work centers in CR03 which are used for operation under capacity header
you have included the check box for Long term planning,otherwise in CM38 you can't see any capacity
requirements data.
7.Before executing CM38,ensure under settings---> general you are giving the period settings properly.
Revert back incase of any more clarifications required.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Vendor's long term plans regarding actualizations
Hi,
Possibly we will decide in 2014 to purchase MBP.
It will be than the first Apple's product in our environment.
If it should run that way we expect to use the mbp for approximately
next 10 years.
How does the Apple's current long term plans conform with the above target
regarding actualizations (bug fixes, security patches) for
OS and all other on-board software of mbp version currently in sell?molom wrote:
dav7 wrote:
Oh, and the medium I want to use needs to scale high. Very high. Into the order of more than a decent amount of TBs... like, say, 40 or 50. Of course that nice, round figure wouldn't pop up out of nowhere the day I have my plans in order, it'd grow - slowly - over time. So not only do I need something scalable, I need something that can scale slowly.
So kinda like a NAS or external HDD type of solution, except one that doesn't use failure-prone media like HDDs. Unless there's a kind of hard disk out there that doesn't fail very "easily" and lasts in an order of years?
-dav7
I believe there is nothing that exists in the world, unless you pay huge money for Solid State Hard Drives. The only solution I see is using a bunch of rewritable double layer Blu-ray discs. I don't think there is any proper solution for what your looking for. Your looking for the perfect that doesn't exist.
I'm not sure how long SSDs will last and I don't think there is any reliable information out there, wether an SSD I plugin now will still work in ten years. Plus you would need one hell of a lot SSDs to store Terabytes of data. BlueRay is probably worse than DVD regarding reliability, until the manufacturers get more experience with them.
Am I the only one to see a pattern with dav7 opening threads looking for things which don't exist?
Last edited by Garns (2008-10-08 13:39:29) -
Short, medium and long term planning in SNP
Hi,
can somebody explain me what Short, medium and long term planning mean in SNP?
Lets, say I have this scenario:
If I have a product with SNP horizon of 35 days, which means that the product is planned in SNP only after 35 days from today. Only PPDs deals with orders in these 35 days.
I have a 3 planning books
short term with 30 days from today
medium term with 7 months from today and
long term with 2 years from today.
When I say short, medium and long term planning in SNP what exactly happens in these ?? What do users usually do in these books?
SNP horizon is 35 days and the short term book is 30 days long, in which SNP does nothing. What's the use of this book?
Thanks.When I say short, medium and long term planning in SNP what exactly happens in these ??
Nothing much from a technical stand point.
What do users usually do in these books?
Check the Time Bucket Profile for the different books. The short Term Book will be in days, the mid term in weeks and the long term in months/quarters etc. The different books allows users to see the keyfigures in different time-based aggregate level.
But if Heuristic is executed then behaviour will be different. Remember SNP Location Heuristic run uses the bucket of the data view to compute the Net Requirement and then try creating Receipts in each bucket within the time horizon of the data view using suitable master data. So if you run Location Heuristic in the short Term (daily) view then you will have many receipts one per day most likely. If you run in mid-term Weekly view then there are less number of receipts one receipt per week till 7 months. likewise for the long term view.
SNP horizon is 35 days and the short term book is 30 days long, in which SNP does nothing. What's the use of this book?
Maybe just to see the data. Location Heuristic run will not generate any new receipt.
Thanks,
Somnath
Maybe you are looking for
-
Where is the jar file includes ejb3.0 interface
I just start using ejb 3.0, when i create a stateless session bean, i can not find the Stateless interface when import javax.ejb.Stateless. Appreciated if someone can let me which jar file includes those interface (like javax.ejb.Remove, javax.ejb.St
-
Functional Areas (FA) in Profit Center Accounting (PCA)
Dear all, We use Functional Areas (FA) to separate fixed costs in Profit Center Accounting (PCA). Originally, in FI, fixed costs are posted with Cost Center which is linked to FA. Now we find out that some cost centers missed their link to FA and hen
-
How to execute the blocks in java
Hi I have doubt on block programing class A{ System.out.println("hai"); public static void main(String[] args){ A a = new A(); compile and run the code the its display "hai" in console how is it possible. How it default called ?
-
Unable to download any of the apps
Over the past couple of weeks I have been having trouble both updating and dowloading new apps on my iPhone 4 and in iTunes. Some work perfectly fine but others just won't download, the size of the app does not matter. On my iPhone it often comes up
-
SNMP Protocol from Azure virtual machine
Hi All, We have one web application where we use .Net OLEPPRN.SNMP protocol library for get the printer details. I am not able to get the printer details from Azure virtual machine(It works fine in my network). Allowed SNMP ports in Azure EndPoints (