Verizons best kept secret

I purchased a new iPhone 6 plus when it first came out was on a waiting list to get one. after I received the phone in less than 2 weeks the phone died.
T took the phone back to the Verizon store and they told me they would replace the phone but I had to wait until the manufacturer sends me a new device. In a week a new phone arrived (or I thought it was new). Recently I dropped my phone and cracked the glass so I took it to Verizon for repairs they told me that it would be cheaper for me to just go to apple and have the glass replaced. They provided me with the information and I was given an appointment four days later. One at the apple store the techinicians examined my phone and stated that it wasn't an apple product but a remanufactured phone from another company. They stated that they would not repair my phone because it didn't contain original apple parts. Also I was told Apple does not honor Verizon refurbished phones.
Needless to say I am furious that Verizon didn't replace my original product with a new phone. After further investigation Verizon admits giving me a refurbished product because at the time there was a six week waiting list on iPhone 6 plus phones and they didn't think I wanted to wait that long.
Now understand I was not made  aware of any of this nor did I know what they were doing. Verizon took it upon themselves to do this. So my phone was switched to a non original apple product. And Apple does not support remanufactured phones from Verizon. Originally Verizon told me that apple was wrong but after some time waiting on line they returned and verified that its correct that apple will not support remanufactured phones from Verizon.
Of course this information was never told to the customer.
Now the only solution Verizon has offered me was to go find another place to repair my phone or file a claim and get another remanufactured phone.    

So you were charged for the replacement??? Full price, no less. That is weird. Whenever I have had a warranty replacement(only once), I have not been charged.
Warranty replacements are not really a secret. Any replacement made after the 14 day return period will be made with a refurbished device. This is per the manufacturers warranty which Verizon is simply facilitating for you. If you made the exchange at an Apple store, it is possible you would have received a new device, but it is not certain you would.
From Apple's warranty:
If during the Warranty Period you submit a valid claim to Apple or an AASP, Apple will, at its option, repair the Apple Product using new or previously used parts that are equivalent to new in performance and reliability, (ii) replace the Apple Product with a device that is at least functionally equivalent to the Apple Product and is formed from new and/or previously used parts that are equivalent to new in performance and reliability, or (iii) exchange the Apple Product for a refund of your purchase price.

Similar Messages

  • Best kept secret??

    I'm beginning to think that the Fascinate is the best kept secret in the android community. With it's update to Froyo it is up to date with all the other phones. The display is unmatched as far as I'm concerned. And trust me when I say that I have been reading and following all the reviews on the androids both here and on the blogs. Unless you want to wait for Droid Charge at sometime in the future and need that front facing camera, the Fascinate is the prettiest phone around. I don't think HTC Motorola or iPhone can match the screen. I hope it stays free over on Best Buy til next month when I can upgrade. I don't need to vid chat. Coming from BB tour, I want one that is trustworthy and will, bottom line, work for calls. I live in Wisconsin and we rely heavily on VZW for connections. Especially in our rural areas which is where I live and drive. Make mine the White Fascinate!!

    So you were charged for the replacement??? Full price, no less. That is weird. Whenever I have had a warranty replacement(only once), I have not been charged.
    Warranty replacements are not really a secret. Any replacement made after the 14 day return period will be made with a refurbished device. This is per the manufacturers warranty which Verizon is simply facilitating for you. If you made the exchange at an Apple store, it is possible you would have received a new device, but it is not certain you would.
    From Apple's warranty:
    If during the Warranty Period you submit a valid claim to Apple or an AASP, Apple will, at its option, repair the Apple Product using new or previously used parts that are equivalent to new in performance and reliability, (ii) replace the Apple Product with a device that is at least functionally equivalent to the Apple Product and is formed from new and/or previously used parts that are equivalent to new in performance and reliability, or (iii) exchange the Apple Product for a refund of your purchase price.

  • One of Adobe's best kept secrets: Audition Content Download! (With Soundbooth Files?)

    I just learned about this yesterday from the cutting edge tour - that with audition you get tons of royalty free sound effects and audio clips.  I never knew that, but to me that should be advertised a bit more!
    Anyhow, as I'm downloading these, I noticed the section called "Soundbooth Scores".  In those folders, there are .SBST files, which I learned are soundbooth files (I've never used soundbooth) .  This leaves me a bit perplexed since soundbooth is discontinued, and when I open them in Audition, I just get a waveform file.  Is that how it's supposed to open?  If so why not simply have a .wav file instead of the .SBST files?  Really cool stuff, just a bit confused if it's supposed to open some sort of multitrack project and I'm not doing it right?
    Thanks!
    (And thanks Adobe for the files!!)

    Thanks!  Great to hear you enjoyed Adam's workshop tour!
    Indeed, the additional content in Audition and Soundbooth has suffered from shifting tides in technology.  Audition itself, when it shipped on shiny disks, came with Loopology, an amazing collection of instrument loops and music beds recorded by Adobe Evangelist and long-haired musician, Jason Levine.  Later, when Soundbooth was the audio application in the Creative Suite, an in-app panel called Resource Central provided access to our collection of around 12,000+ sound effects and Soundbooth Scores - dynamic music projects which could intelligently recompose themselves based on duration and parameters, and offered some limited mixing options.
    Around the time Soundbooth was discontinued, the Resource Central servers were as well as it was based upon Flash and some legacy server backends that were being retired.  To ensure users still had access to all this royalty-free content, it was moved to a download page on adobe.com and linked to in the application menu.
    I have been in the process of creating a much nicer landing page for accessing this content, as well as fixing a few issues with the Soundbooth Scores bundles.  Expect some news about this very soon.
    Edit:  Oh!  As for your question about Scores in Audition, the Score projects themselves were a proprietary SBST file, which contained the sequence details for the composition, and an Assets folder, which contains the loops and clips used to make up the overall song.  While Audition doesn't currently support SBSTs or Scores in general, you could conceivably re-arrange the assets to build compositions.  SBSTs ARE supported in Premiere Elements since 2013, I believe.
    Have a great day!

  • Whats the best Audio Interface to use with Logic and MacBook Pro?

    I currently own a Line 6 Pod X3 Pro and although its much better than the Eleven Rack (what an overrated piece of junk in a pretty candy coating, more fizz than club soda and still no balls. Some say it just needs a cheap overdrive box to do the trick. I say how can it possibly be worth a Grand if a cheap added piece of equiptment is needed to improve the sound?) It's still not exactly top notch, to say the least.
         I was really considering the SSL (Solid State Logic) XLogic Alpha-Link MADI, a 24 channel high-end AD/DA Converter. It's somewhat pricy, but you can't possibly find a bigger bang for your buck, however I don't really need that many channels. I'm really going for quality over quantity, but I'll pay for the extra inputs if there's no way around getting top of the line otherwise.

    Thanks but I already figured it out, or rather B&H did for me. Firstly, to use the SSL with a DAW you'll need to use the Extreme "PCIe card" which neither notebooks or iMacs accomodate. So unless I want to dish out an additional $1,500 for an RME laptop interface (with built in PCIe card) for this interface i'm shoot out of luck, boo! I was really looking foreward to that set up.
        However, to answer my own question (and save a couple hundred bucks) you simply can't beat Apogee's Ensemble, which is built specifically for Mac. Much simpler - no drivers needed, and I actually understand the specs, 16 channels, and 4 of which even have transparent mic preamps. And its only $200 more than the Rosetta (only 2 channels, and nothing but converters - no preamps).
         The main thing I also wanted was to have as least components as possible going into Logic. I already passed my "gear collecting phase," and the more I added the worst it sounded. I was already forewarned of such results, but when your a newbe like I was I guess you have to find out for yourself. So I'll be getting rid of my Line 6 POD X3 Pro; dbx 1066; Presonus Eureka; Aphex 204; and 8821 Sonic Maximizer ( I already got rid of the 11-Rack, good riddence!
       And replacing them all with an Avalon 737 - anything that sounds that good over YouTube has gotta kill - and the guy from B&H said "thats one SWEET set up!" Of course every body knows Apogee and Avalon are no brainers (if you've got the patience to save up for the good stuff) but I'm more of a best kept secret type of guy (or try to be) however this time I don't mind conforming. Taylored quality and simplicity...Perfect...what more can a guy (or girl) ask for (now if I can only get my hands on some Vienna Symphonic Orchestra Software to pick up the slack where Logic is lacking.)
        I just want to stop with the learning every new gadget nonesense already and get back to being a musician again.
    PS How do I switch this topic to the Logic forum? I'm sure it will be more helpful to others there.

  • Domain purchase of e-mail address

    Looking for some assistance with a similar problem as posted by ANGRYELF on 1-22-15.  My situation came about by moving to an area that is on the fringe of all carrier zones.  Prior to moving I contacted Verizon to see if they had equipment to sell that would allow me to keep my DSL and home phone with them.  They looked at their coverage map and said I was out of any coverage area.  I then contacted Verizon Moving folks.  They could not even find my address and had to send it to engineering to add the address in and would contact me in 2 weeks.  They never called back and as my hard wire phone lines ends 1/2 mile from the new house, I called back to ask that if I had the hard wire line extended, could I get DSL.  They again checked and said that DSL was not available in this area.  Net result was No phone and No internet thru Verizon.  Finally found a work around to get phone and internet with different providers and when I installed the equipment, I ported my Verizon number as I'd had it for a number of years and everyone has it.  Received a call from the new provided stating that Verizon had contacted them and my phone would be released in 3 days.  Not being a computer tech type, I never realized that an e-mail address could be ported or purchased/rented on an annual basis to keep it active.  Nowhere on the Verizon web site do they mention this fact nor do they bother to send out any notification that the customer can keep their same e-mail account for a fee.  Zip as for information.  I figured I may lose my DSL when the phone ported but since they are 2 different functions, I expected a notice that my DSL access would be discontinued in X-days and options presented at that time.  Nothing.  When I tried to log in after porting the phone over, I received a message saying my account has been suspended and to contact Tech Support.  I spent the next 2.5 hours talking to customer service, tech support twice, sales, domain management and all to no purpose.  Since the account had been closed, there was nothing that could be done to even temporarily reinstate it to allow me to submit a work requet to buy/rent the account on an annual basis.  Are any Verizon customers aware that there is a whole segment that deals with just internet, domains, and e-mails for residential and business customers?  I wasn't until I called tech support trying to get my account re-activated.  They transferred me to them.  Several options exist thru them such as repairmyemail.com or KEEPMYEMAIL.COM.  Best kept secret in the world.  Option 3 allows you to put in a work request to allow the customer to buy and keep their existing e-mail for about $20 per year.  Since mine had been active for several years and like ANGRYELF, 90% of my dealings referenced this address.  The bottom line in talking with everyone at Verizon (other than the failure to present options prior to closing the phone account) was that since the account had been closed by billing, there was no way to re-activate the DSL portion long enough to submit the work request under the keepmyemail.com screen.  I am very surprised that a communications company of this size with the number to customers they have would be so callused to just drop a former long term customer cold with no regard or options especially after they were unable to provide the requested  transfer of services.  I also don't beleive they are incapable of making this happen - everything that pertains to an account - setup, activation, billing, fixing problems, closure- is under their control.  It is just a matter of putting the right infomation in the right box and hitting enter.  Just like past experience with my hard wire phone line problems. 

    Hi ANGRYELF,
    Your issue has been escalated to a Verizon agent. Before the agent can begin assisting you, they will need to collect further information from you. Please go to your profile page for the forum and look at the top of the middle column where you will find an area titled "My Support Cases". You can reach your profile page by clicking on your name beside your post, or at the top left of this page underneath the title of the board.
    Under "My Support Cases" you will find a link to the private board where you and the agent may exchange information. The title of your post is the link. This should be checked on a frequent basis, as the agent may be waiting for information from you before they can proceed with any actions. To ensure you know when they have responded to you, at the top of your support case there is a drop down menu for support case options. Open that and choose "subscribe". Please keep all correspondence regarding your issue in the private support portal.

  • Books on SAP Event Management

    There are 3 books on SAP Event Management out there:
    SAP Event Management - SAP's best kept secret...
    Title: SAP Event Management - SAP's best kept secret
    ISBN:   978-0-9842350-1-8
    Author: Kevin Wilson,  Author Profile: Amazon
    Publisher: Genie Press,  Published: 2/5/2010
    Book website: Genie Press
    Available at: Genie Press, Amazon
    SAP Event Management - Das umfassende Handbuch (German)
    Title: SAP Event Management - Das umfassende Handbuch, Language: German
    ISBN:   978-3836215510
    Authors: Berthold Hege, Jens Kappauf, Bernd Lauterbach, Frank Overgoor, Rob Uljee
    Publisher: SAP Press,  Published: August 2010
    Available at: Amazon
    Implementing and Configuring SAP Event Management
    Title: Implementing and Configuring SAP Event Management
    ISBN:  978-1-59229-316-2
    Author: Sandeep Pradhan
    Publisher: SAP Press,  Published: 2010
    Book website: SAP Press
    Available at: SAP Press

    Thanks Kevin.

  • Why more people don't use iWork Revealed

    I just upgraded to Lion and am faced with upgraded a number of my computer apps. I have used Office for eons but have Pages and Numbers on my iPhone and iPad but have NEVER thought of iWork with any seriousness. Until today.
    In ready about Lion and Mountain Lion (around the corner), I see that IF you have iWork your Pages and Numbers docs can sync seamlessly with your Pages and Numbers apps on your iDevices. Hmmm. I thought. And Office 2011 is $150 for the Home Student version and iWork is $79.  Hmmm...
    So I went to <apple.com> and the Store and clicked "Mac Software" only to see this:
    And as I scrolled down the page, I can't find iWork anywhere!
    It seems it is only listed under "Apple Software"
    Is is not "Mac Software?"
    And why would Apple willingly promote Office over iWork? Why put Office in the middle of the top row of apps between Adobe and Filemaker? And as already said, not even list iWork in the Mac Software section at all?
    All of a sudden, my enthusiasm for iWork was diminished as I started to wonder: if Apple doesn't have the faith to promote iWorks over Office, maybe iWorks isn't as good as Office and I should heed this and just stick with what I've used for years and not stray.
    How could one of the best marketing companies in the world, Apple, not promote it's own same featured software over it's competitor's unless it wasn't as good and Apple didn't want to over state it's software's value?
    Apple to my observation, and I say this as a BIG fan wanting the best for Apple, is treating iWork as an adobpted child they don't love much.
    Because iWorks syncs with Apple devices and seems to have great functions, it would seem that Apple marketing should hike to the mountain top and trumpet it's existence as loud as possible! But Apple is not. iWork is a best kept secret. Why? I don't have the foggiest. But Apple needs to wake up, unless it's a political thing and Apple has told Bill it wouldn't step on his shoes and over promote iWork.
    I would almost bet my last dime, there's some politics going on here. Why else would Apple hold back? They don't on anything else. Strange indeed.
    I'm still considering buying iWork instead of Office 2011. But the wind has diminished in my sails thanks to Apple's lack of enthusiasm.
    Fix this Apple.

    Your points are well taken Tom. I realize that if I abandon Office, since the world seems to turn on Office, that I would have to save my work as both an iWork doc and then an Office doc if I need to send it to someone that needs to edit it. Otherwise, I would send it as a PDF which is still double work to some extent.
    But regarding preaching to the converted, I don't know. I think there are a lot of folks that don't know about iWorks and being that Apple keeps it a bit of a secret, this was the reason I created this thread.
    But I absolutely copied the text and then sent it to the Feedback link found in the bottom right of each page instead "Contact Us" as I always do when I have a point I want to convey to Apple.
    But I'm really considering going with iWork over Office since iWork can save as Office docs. And with that being so, being able to sync iWork docs to my iPhone and iPad seems kind of new and cool. Granted I'm not about to do any heavy work on an iWork doc via my iPhone. But I could read one from my iPhone. And I "could" actually edit an iWork doc on my iPad even though virtual keyboards are a tad tough to work on versus a physical keyboard.

  • How get links the way I want them on new pages?

    For new pages, is there a way I can tell DW to make the links the color I want on all new pages? thanks.

    Yes you can by learning how to style your links:  I suggest try this link:
    <http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_link.asp>
    Make sure these new links are local to your pages.  this is done by putting the styles in the header section (avoid using inline styles for reasons best kept secret to avoid arguments).
    hth

  • Creating IRs from digital sources...READ THIS ;-)

    THE BEST WAY TO CREATE AN IMPULSE RESPONSE:
    This technique ONLY works if your staying in the digital domain......
    eg: IRing a Lexi 960 or similar that is hooked up over spdif / etc... or (WAVES, Altiverb libraries This Technique WILL NOT yield results in the analog domain....for that you will have to deconvolve and sweep.
    1) Record some silent audio.......(in other words nothing)
    2) Open "nothing recording" in sample editor.....silence the whole thing.
    3) With the pencil-tool draw 1 spike (it has to be just one)
    4) Now set-up a digital-reverb on a buss in Logic (set to 100% wet)
    5) Place "spike" audio on an audio track
    6) Route that tracks output to the Reverb buss.
    7) Bounce in real-time the reverberated spike
    8) Open the reverberated spike in the sample-editor and chop the the front and rear
    YOU ARE DONE
    You now created a perfect 100% impulse-response....completed perfectly cloned....no deconvolution needed...it's done!
    I work for a major video-game company.........and our Audio-Programmer (a genius) taught me this......(He has a doctorate in synhesis)
    You see the sine sweeping is neccessary only when IRing in the analog world .....The result of deconvolution is actually a spike..
    So the other week I was at a friends place....He has altiverb and IR1 from waves....Their libraries have fantastic famous drum rooms / concert-halls etc......
    I spiked it all
    I'm not kidding...If you don't believe me ( I was-a non-believer myself....) Just research it ...........It's the best kept secret For years I was friggin sine-sweepimg digitally hooked-up reverbs....takes forever and the result is not as good as the spike technique....
    The Spike technique is 100% acurate..
    Go have fun
    Cheers.
    SvK

    You can draw by hand whatever impulses responses you want in the digital domain. As to whether they will faithfully replicate any of the "famous" reverb trails that some libraries go to great lengths to capture is doubtful I think, though it would be interesting to do listening tests to compare them. But given the sensitivity of the ear in the analog domain, the complex nature of impulse responses that are well cpatured from complex acoustic environments, and what you can draw with your hand - I would bet that no IR vendor is losing any money to someone trying to replicate the impulse response of the Vienna Philharmonic's hall with the pencil tool in Logic.

  • Changing Owner & Business Group of ASD Custom Resource

    So this is a bit of an expansion of this discussion: https://communities.vmware.com/thread/500669?start=0&tstart=0
    You will see that pizzle85 managed to solve his challenge of BG object ownership by using an ASD Service Catalog Request located in each Business Group's Entitlements so a member of the business group can just run the Provision required to bring the BG item under management in the business group.  This is quite an effective method to solve the need.  He then has a Resource Action that allows for re-"Provision" which changes owner within the business group: a necessary task because managers tend to move around a lot so they can look busy. (just kidding, I love managers--who have a sense of humor)  So to change owner... just perform a "provision" again.
    Apparently this is one of the best kept secrets in vRA because it has been hard to figure out, and nobody is writing about it.  (I can only assume that there is some SE out there who has worked with the developers to get this capability going and it hasn't been shared widely.)
    Note: I think Business Groups as a Service is something I need to plan for (vs centrally managed Business Groups) even though their future implementation might vary, so my examples here are related to that effort because I am too lazy to demonstrate a generic example.  BUT... the idea is... ownership of ASD Inventory Objects (representing ANY Custom Resource) can be modified using this method.  Ownership includes both the owner represented by "ME" in the Items list... and the Business Group  (subtenant Reference & Label) where the item resides in inventory.
    In 6.2.x, I have not found any method in the vRO plugin for vRA to be able to change ownership and business group of an ASD Custom Resource Inventory Item, but it can be accomplished via a combination of (1) ASD Service Catalog or Resource Action "Provision" capabilities and (2) REST calls through the vRA plugin service channels.  (the latter uses the plugin service account authorizations/entitlements)
    Consider this image...
    This could represent a central management point for many business groups: where I can assign a set of resource actions allowing for automation of various business group needs, an anchor point for actions.   Those in the sktest business group Support User or Manager Role would be able to see all the business groups globally if they were all provisioned in sktest.  (a bucket to manage from)
    This also could represent a starting point where business groups are created as real objects, returned as custom resources, and "provisioned" as inventory object items.  But once there...maybe you want to move it?
    Let's say we later decided, seantesting doesn't belong in sktest because we wanted to change from the "we manage it for you" model to the "manage it yourself" model.  How do you move it?
    Like this...
    And it moves now owned by the vRA plugin service account... (which an entitled user could run Take Ownership and own it in that business group)
    The service account obviously needs to be part of the destination business group and as it ends up, has to have an entitlement to any "provision" action in the business group even though the object doesn't exist there.
    This is a tricky hack and this is how it works...
    1. vRO workflow calls the Take Ownership Action in vRA via REST (front door process).  As noted before, this has a provision attribute to the action which we know changes the owner.  So we would expect that the owner would change to the user that is making the request: which is the service account.  The service account becomes the owner, but this wouldn't change the Business Group.
    2. So we change subtentantRef and subtenantLabel in the REST call to the business group we want to target, even though the object isn't in inventory in that business group.  And Voila! The business group item representation re-provisions as a new owner in a new business group.  Effectively changing the owner and moving the object from one BG to another BG using the management-method vs the self-service-method (the latter as pizzle85 did).
    Again... maybe you care less about Business Groups.  Maybe you would prefer self-service. It is the capability of moving a custom resource inventory representation that matters.
    Here is an example of the REST call to run the "Take Ownership" action.  I have a script before this that pulls in all the variables for the "Resource" I am targeting (from the BusinessGroup object ID), the action I am running  (Take Ownership ID), the business group Ref and Label) and some of the properties I need for the Take Ownership action like bgName... but those are actually not necessary. (all of the "entries" are what is required per the Take Ownership request... if that request didn't require any inputs, there would be no entries... it is the top change of subtenant that allows for the BG move)
    System.log("resourceRef: " + resourceRef);
    System.log("resourceActionRef: " + resourceActionRef);
    System.log("targetRef: " + targetRef);
    System.log("targetLabel: " + targetLabel);
    System.log("bgName: " + bgName);
    var payload ={
    "@type":"ResourceActionRequest",
    "resourceRef":{"id":resourceRef},
    "resourceActionRef":{"id":resourceActionRef},
    "organization":{"tenantRef":"vsphere.local","tenantLabel":"vsphere.local","subtenantRef":targetRef,"subtenantLabel":targetLabel},
    "state":"SUBMITTED",
    "requestNumber":0,
    "requestData":
    {"entries":[
    {"key": "provider-rYouSure","value":{"type":"boolean","value":"true"}},
    {"key": "provider-bgName","value": {"type": "string","value":bgName}}]}
    payload = System.getModule("org.dojotoolkit.dojo.json").serialize(payload);
    System.log(payload);
    Server.log(payload);
    var catalogRest = cafeHost.createRestClient(vCACCAFEServicesEnum.CATALOG_SERVICE);
    var response = catalogRest.post("consumer/requests",payload);
    Best of luck in your Automation Efforts!
    Sean

    Turns out... it is likely not required as part of the request data.

  • Why does the Fireworks save for web function give better results than in Photoshop?

    Having used the trial version of Fireworks, I have noticed that the save for web function gives greater compression and image quality than saving for web in Photoshop. Why is this?
    As Adobe are not continuing in developing Fireworks, does anyone know if will they will improve the save for web function in Photoshop to match the Fireworks version?
    Are there any third party companies who anyone can recommend who will process large volumes of images for web?
    Thanks

    One of my favourite topics ;-P
    First, the save for web function in Photoshop has not seen any real updates in a long time. In Fireworks PNG export allows for fully transparent optimized files with indexed 256 or less colours, which is impossible in the save for web function in Photohop. It is unsupported.
    This is one of the reasons why Fireworks does a much better job than Photoshop. Another reason is that Photoshop adds meta junk in its exported files, and this also increases the file size (and should be removed, because there are also a number of fields which include information about your setup).
    One other caveat is that Photoshop's save for web functions neither allows for a choice in chroma subsampling, and instead decides automatically below a certain quality threshold to degrade the colour sharpness quality. The user has no control over this. (Fireworks also limits the user this way.)
    One thing to be careful of: FW's jpg quality setting, and PS's quality settings are very different - a 50 in Photoshop is not the same 50 setting in Fireworks.
    For jpg optimization I generally use RIOT (free): http://luci.criosweb.ro/riot/
    (When you install, be careful NOT to install the extra junkware!)
    Fireworks cannot change the chroma subsampling to 4:2:0, which does degrade the quality a bit compared to RIOT and Photoshop in my experience. Photoshop adds useless meta information, even if the user tells it not to do that. RIOT allows you to remove that information, saving 6k. RIOT also offers an automatic mode that optimizes existing jpg images without degrading the quality further, and often saves 10k or more, depending on the images.
    Interestingly enough, in my tests exported Fireworks jpg images are always reduced in file size by RIOT, due to FW's jpg export limitations, without any image degradation.
    In my tests FW's jpg quality versus file size turns out to be the worst of all three. RIOT generally wins, or is at least on par with Photoshop.
    As for PNG export, Photoshop's save for web function is quite abysmal. No 256 colour full transparency export is possible, while Fireworks does support this.
    Having said that, there is a free alternative that leaves both Photoshop AND Fireworks in the dust: Color Quantizer. http://x128.ho.ua/color-quantizer.html
    CQ is an amazing little tool: with it anyone can create PNG files with full transparency and reduced to ANY number of colours! It means that a 512 colour PNG with full transparency is now very easy to do. On top of that, for more difficult images a simple quality mask brush tool allows the user to control and retain even small colour details in a PNG, while reducing the file size to an absolute minimum.
    CQ is one of the best kept secrets of a Web Developer's toolkit. And it is free!
    Both RIOT and Color Quantizer have a built-in batch mode. Both are available for WIndows. Not for Mac. If you are on a Mac, try imageOptim. Not nearly as good as RIOT and CQ, but quite passable.
    PS to be fair, the newest versions of Photoshop do allow for export of 8bit PNGs with full transparency through the use of its Generator functionality. But again, it cannot compete with CQ. And as far as I am aware, Generator cannot be used in Photoshop's batch processing (which, btw, is very slow! For simpler daily image processing tasks I have to do in batches, I prefer IrfanView, which is lightning fast! IrfanView).

  • Will i need to have streaming server

    Hello and happy saturday,
    I have not used robohelp before, and thought I would download
    the trial. but
    just a quick question.
    when I create a robohelp application, do I need to put it on
    a streaming
    server, I am confused as to what to do when I have all
    created as, I wouldnt
    want my user to get to my page and then have to wait ages for
    it to open. I
    was going to use captive to capture me doing some things with
    somftware and
    create a small tutorial, I want to use that with robohelp.
    should I or will i need to have my application on a streaming
    server, if so
    can any one recomend some where that i can page a few dollars
    a month that
    is ok.
    best regards
    kenny

    Thanks you very much
    gratefully appreciated
    Kenny
    "johndaigle" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:f2ncae$sa5$[email protected]..
    > Hi, Twocans
    > Rick is right on. If I could expand a bit in case others
    are lurking with
    > similar questions. One of the great things about Adobe
    Captivate is that
    > the
    > Flash player is so common in all web browsers these
    days, most everyone
    > can
    > view them quite easily. More and more authors are using
    camcorder video to
    > illustrate real life situations to users and not just
    talking heads.
    >
    > The Flash Video format (FLV) is now supported by Adobe
    Captivate and Adobe
    > RoboHelp. This is where the Flash Streaming Server Rick
    referred to may be
    > involved. Fortunately in most cases I've not found it
    necessary. You can
    > just
    > include your Captivate movie (with or without FLV) into
    your RoboHelp
    > project
    > and publish to your webserver. If you are using FLV, you
    would want to add
    > the
    > file to the Baggage virtual folder.. If you have a bunch
    of FLV video and
    > this
    > is a major part of your project, then it might be worth
    the extra
    > investment
    > to host them on a Flash Streaming Server (your own, or a
    hosted server).
    > Meanwhile, if you'd like to read more about ways to
    include movies into
    > RoboHelp projects, check out my article on the Adobe
    Developer Center.
    >
    >
    http://www.adobe.com/devnet/captivate/articles/cp_rh_integration.html
    >
    > While, you're there, check out the many other articles
    by Rick Stone,
    > Peter
    > Grainge, Craig Clarke and Matthew Ellison.
    > The developer center is one of Adobe's best kept
    secrets. I'm surprised
    > many
    > folks simply don't know about it.
    > Thanx,
    > john
    >

  • Install Problem Android Market Place

    Using Android 2.2.1.  Get error when trying to install Flash Player.  From a barcode it says the app is not found from the market place it says the same thing.  Running on a Star S3000 with MediaTek MTK6516, 416MHZ processor.

    Hi, This is the latest info as far as I know on these devices:
    http://www.adobe.com/flashplatform/certified_devices/   
    You may want to contact your Carrier or Manufacturer for more information. From all I've seen and read it seems like getting Flash Player on these phones is a best kept secret, LOL
    Hope you can find it.
    Thanks,
    eidnolb

  • Closed captioning with Premiere Pro CS5.5, exported to wmv/mp4

    My employer suddenly has a push to be ADA compliant, so all videos going forward need to have captioning, and would prefer to have it closed captioned. I've read that you can add captions with Encore and output them to disc, but since all of the videos are posted online, nothing is burned to disc so that doesn't help. I also know you can use scc or mcc files to add closed captions to a broadcast stream, but since these aren't for broadcast, that doesn't help either.
    All of this means is that I need to add closed captioning to online video only. What I'd like to know is this: Is there any way to add closed captioning to video that will be streamed online? Or, am I doomed to putting everything into lower thirds?
    I'm using Premiere Pro CS5.5 (I also have AE CS5.5).
    Thanks

    As a broadcast engineer, I would suspect, and it would make sense that online video files would also be encoded with EIA-608 and EIA-708 set forth by the Electronic Industries Alliance and monitored by the FCC ( Broadcast Standard ). This makes sense to me as all existing video programs which already comply with the EIA-608 and 708 standards would then, automatically play closed captioning when encoded to a video file for playback.
    The FCC has recently required all online video to include Closed Captioning as per the Accessibility Act of 2010 ( FCC: MB Docket No. 11-154) Subpart 6 of this document appears to define that all devices which may playback video through the internet, must be able to support the CEA-708, or closed captioning for digital broadcast television. CEA-708 is a form of embedded data often referred to as metadata which is contained within the MPEG-2 stream.
    Not to get too technical about MPEG streams, but in essence, even though your end up with a single file, there are traditionally 3 elementary streams of data contained within. Each one has a PID, or Program Identifier number which identifies the Video Stream, Audio 1 stream and Audio 2 Stream. Additional elementary streams can be added such as a data stream containing Closed Captioning- or whatever like Dolby Digital. The PID allows a Demultiplexer to split the streams appropriately for playback.
    I would hope there is a program out there that would embed the scc or mcc file ( however they are produced )  possibly after you export the sequence to a file. One of my favoite and best kept secret long-term video websites out there is videohelp DOT com. there is a plethera of kewl software to do all weird things to video, maybe even add CC!
    All this still doesn't help us with Premiere Pro though...

  • Director v Flash

    How is Director different then Flash, and which is better for
    game development, web based games or otherwise?
    What is latest or best version of Director avaialble today?

    ripps7 wrote:
    > How is Director different then Flash, and which is
    better for game development, web based games or otherwise?
    > What is latest or best version of Director avaialble
    today?
    Hi Ripps.
    The question of Director vs Flash has been asked many times.
    I have a FAQ page relating to this with links to articles at:
    http://www.fbe.unsw.edu.au/learning/director/resources/FAQ/web.asp#5
    Here's another link to an article called
    The Best Kept Secret in Town - Application development with
    Macromedia Director
    http://webddj.sys-con.com/read/45623.htm
    It also compares Director to Flash from an application
    development point of view.
    The Director Podcast had an episode on Director vs Flash. It
    can be downloaded from:
    http://www.magicgate.com/podcast/director/shownotes/director_podcast_ep20_06_13_06.html
    The short answer is that Director is superior to Flash in
    many ways including
    * supports real-time 3D
    * has a greater range of digital media support
    * supports plugins (Xtras) to allow the software to be
    extended
    * Director can access operating system commands
    Flash is better than Director in some areas. So, if you want
    to create a game or some other application, your
    choice of tool will depend on what exactly you want it to do.
    To your other question, the current version of Director is MX
    2004. This is version 10. There's a 10.1 and 10.1.1
    update that are free to download. Adobe have announced that
    Director 11 will be released by the end of this year.
    regards
    Dean
    Director Lecturer / Consultant / Director Enthusiast
    http://www.fbe.unsw.edu.au/learning/director
    http://www.multimediacreative.com.au
    email: [email protected]

Maybe you are looking for