Version 7 improved compared to 4?

Hi Everyone,
Has anyone upgraded from version 4 to version 7 of premiere elements (or replaced)? Have you found 7 to be more stable? I use 4 for large mpeg2 compilations from my sony hdd camcorder and have considerable instability when adding multiple titles (I title the date on every clip).
Thanks, Eric

As far as I'm concerned, Mpeg and PE, is like oil and water, they just don't mix very well.
This is especially true with large files, or reasonably complex projects.
I doubt this has changed much with PE7, but I'm all ears if someone wants to convince me otherwise (I'm currently using PE4).
If you want to make your life more enjoyable, convert Mpeg to DV-AVI and use that, PE loves DV-AVI.
I use Windows Movie Maker to convert my Sony Handycam Mpeg's to DV-AVI, and PE4 runs okay with these conversions.
Another option is to switch to Sony's Vegas software, this pakage is geared towards Mpeg and handles these files with no conversion to DV-AVI...

Similar Messages

LD-3W new version with improved battery life. Myth...

I am looking to get an LD-3W and searching the net for what is available I find one or two UK vendors are offering what they describe as "New version with improved battery life".
One showed a picture of an LD3W box with a small V2 printed on it in the same font style as the rest of the product text. Is there such a thing as a version 2 with improved battery life?
6120c (3uk) and 6300 (Orange), LD-3W

Hi knockknock
Latest user guides still describe battery as BL-5C but I notice my box has Euro1 under Nokia LD-3W.
Happy to have helped forum in a small way with a Support Ratio = 37.0

64 bit version in Essbase version 11 performance compared to 32 bit

Hi :)
I am interested if anyone could tell me about performance experience in an Essbase 64 bit version 11.x.x installation compared to a 32 bit version 9.3 installation? I am currently working with BSO cubes and would like to know if we could aggregate/calculate cubes faster switching to a newer version and a 64-bit installation.
BR
Michael

You can address up to eight threads in parallel calc in 64 bit versus the four in 32 bit.
And you have much more efficient access to memory.
I know I have read of some people seeing slower performance post the move to 64 bit, but that's the exception, not the rule.
You may have to reconfigure (it's likely a good chance to examine your applications regardless of what you end up doing) the block and the caches and maybe even the calcs to get the best performance, but regardless of what you end up doing, moving to 64 bit should see significant speed increases.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Version-performance improve

Hi,
When I am creating a version for the interface its taking lot of time.some times I am getting memory out of bound exception.When Ever I see this exception am closing all the ODI related apps( like operator etc..) and I am able to create the version.But,is there any way to improve the performance,when we create the version.
"Is there any way to reduce the version creation time ?".In my case to create a version for an interface having 8-10 tables taking around 15mins.
I want to decrease this time as suppose If i will have to create 10 interfaces version then on an average i am spending 150mins without any productivity.
Please let me know is it possible?
Thanks in advance
ODI version: 10.1.3.4

In Flash Player, SWF versioning is primarily a mechansim for maintaining backwards compatiblity.
New features are tied to the version where they're introduced, but the important distinction is that we offer bug-for-bug backwards compatibility, with security as an exception.
If we encounter an API that works incorrectly in previous versions and the fix is likely to break existing content, we'll version-check the fix and apply it to only versions equal or greater to the SWF version where it's introduced.
I can't think of a good example where we've version-checked a performance fix off the top of my head, but it's definitely within the realm of possibility.
TLDR; You'll probably want to publish to the highest SWF version unless you have a good reason not to, especially now that background update is widely deployed.

DR site OS version is different compare with Production

Hi All,
In my production 11gR2 database running in RHEL 5.6 version.
My DR site DELL server is advance version and the minimum OS version RHEL 5.7. So I couldn't able to install RHEL 5.6.
If I install advance version of OS then it will give any issues during the DR database implementation. Anyone please give your suggestion....
Muthu

Hello,
Please refer this http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25608/standby.htm#i58150
You can have your OS on primary and standby servers to be different, but make sure that the same release of Oracle Database is installed on both primary and standby servers.
Note from the document:
Data Guard provides increased flexibility for Data Guard configurations in which the primary and standby systems may have different CPU architectures, operating systems (for example, Windows & Linux), operating system binaries (32-bit/64-bit), or Oracle database binaries (32-bit/64-
bit).
The same release of Oracle Database Enterprise Edition must be installed on the primary database and all standby databases, except during rolling database upgrades using logical standby databases.

Menu dropdowns dissappear. I loved FFV3 why are there so many changes to Firefox and no update works properly? Can you stick to a version and improve on that one? It seems everything is getting screwed up.

I think I covered it. I want a stable browser. I work on computers for a living and Firefox has been the proven browser for a very long time and FFV3 was the best browser on the planet. Why fix something that isn't broken. I don't know what other browser will fulfill my needs like firefox did. Why are you guys screwing around with the best browser on the planet? Get it together guys.

You could take a look at this iTunes Version History on Wikipedia if you want a feel for what goes on in each update and how frequent they are. The last few major updates have been two years apart. Most of the point updates have little impact on the way the user interacts with the software. You don't have to upgrade with each update unless you have bought or upgraded a device that now requires a newer minimum version to work with. E.g. iOS 8 requires iTunes 11.4 or later.
There are some major layout changes in iTunes 12, but by and large any task that you could do in 11 can be done in 12. For example the new Get Info dialog lacks right-click context menus (at least for now) but it still accepts most standard keyboard shortcuts and drag & drop actions. If you're used to doing everything via a context menu it is going to be confusing to start with. A workaround is to hold down shift as you right-click > get info on a track selection to get the old style dialog.
Regarding the inability to delete playlists from the device I suspect you were working in the wrong context, i.e. looking at the playlists on the device in say the Music > Playlists sidebar for a device that is synced to the library. You should select the device first from the row of source icons, then Settings > Music from the sidebar, then deselect the playlist in question from the list of playlists scheduled to sync to the device, and sync.
tt2

Exported version looks terrible compared to what i see in iMovie

trying to export a vid i've got done. it is for youtube. i've got some text in a few spots. when i'm looking at the vid in Movie, it looks great! it looks exactly like it should. the text has a nice solid outline. but when i export, the text on the vid looks horrible and blotchy and in general the footage (some live action stuff) looks at least 50% worse than what i see in iMovie. totally unacceptable, really. there's got to be a better way.
i have tried different options when exporting. but there has to be something i'm missing. what are my options? here is a comparison of what i see in imovie vs what i see when i export:
http://i320.photobucket.com/albums/nn356/Deloreans/imovievsexportcomp.jpg

If this is reproducible, you should report it as a bug at http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family#problem
Exporting at 100% is a workaround to a problem that shouldn't exist.

How to compare 2 version strings (of the format x.x.x.x where x : {0, 99})

I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production,
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
I have a scenario like:
Table1:
Name Null Type
NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(64)
VERSION NOT NULL VARCHAR2(64)
Data:
Table1
Name Version
A 1
B 12.1.0.2
B 8.2.1.2
B 12.0.0
C 11.1.2
C 11.01.05
I want the output as:
Name Version
A 1
B 12.1.0.2
C 11.01.05
Basically ,I want to get rows for each name which having highest version. For this i am using following query:
SELECT t1.NAME,
t1.VERSION
FROM TABLE1 t1
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE1 t2
on (t1.NAME = t2.NAME and t1.VERSION < t2.VERSION)
where t2.NAME is null
Now 't1.VERSION < t2.VERSION' only works in normal version cases but in cases such as:
B 12.1.0.2
B 8.2.1.2
It fails, So i want a PL/SQL script to normalize the version strings and compare them for higher value.

Hi,
Here's one way:
ORDER BY REGEXP_REPLACE ( REGEXP_REPLACE ( version
                                       , '(\d+)'
                            , '0000\1'
                , '0+(\d{5})'
                , '\1'
                )This assumes that you never have more than 5 digits in a row. You can easily change that to any fixed number.
This will not cause an error if you have letters or other symbols in the string.
This makes no assumptions about how many numbers are in the string, or what characters delimit the numbers.
Here's how it works:
The inner REGEXP_REPLACE adds 4 '0's immediately before any substring of digits. This guarantees that all numbers are at least 5 digits long.
The outer REGEXP_REPLACE removes '0's from the beginning of numbers that are more than 5 digits long, which guaranteees that the numbers will be exactly 5 digits long. '00008' will come before '00012'

Hierarchical report to compare simulation version

Hi,
Which are the hierarchical report where simulation version can be compared?
Thx

Hi,
In addition you can directly access from T Codes like CN41, CN41N, CNE5 etc.... Please see that "Version Data" is selected in the DB Profile.
Regards,
Arul.

Compare Versions of Message mapping?? possible??

Hi guys,
Just want to check, if Messag mapping versions can be compared, as we do in ABAP versions.
I think, answer is almost NO.
Just want to confirm before concluding.

Hi,
I've never heard of such functionality in PI. But actually there is one smart thing you can do simply display both your mappings as text and put them both into a single Excel spreadsheet and write a simple Excel expression that will compare mappings for particular fields. I think that also some text editors have a functionality to compare two text files, but I cannot recall any particular one right now.
Hope this helps,
Greg

Compare the versions of a Report Tree

Hi All,
How to compare the 2 versions of the same Report Tree in the same client? I have a Report Tree and I need to identify the changes made in each versions (Transports).
Is there any Program/Function Module that servers the purpose.
Regards,
Kriththika

Hi,
Open the program in SE38.
Goto menu Utilities->Versions->Version Management.
There select the two version you want compare and click on the Difference Button on the application toolbar(Second button).
Regards,
Sesh

Comparing two PDF documents | Acrobat Tips and Tricks | Adobe TV

This video will get you started with using the improved Compare Documents command in Acrobat 9 to identify what has changed between two versions of a PDF file.
http://adobe.ly/xqvrc7

Hi there. Thanks for the video. But is there a feature to move among the found differences? Or to show ONLY the differences? In a large document, it's not enough to just "look for" the color-coded differences.
I have not found any such features on viewing a compared doc. I've also looked in the help and now am looking to see if other resources discussing PDF compare might show it. Thanks for any thoughts.

New version of soundblaster xfi xtrememu

comes with heatsink and additional power supply. This addition power supply cause temperature to raise up. what are improvements, compare this new version to the older version?
thanks

How is it stupid? Who mentioned overclocking? Anyone with a clue knows that if you pump more volts through silicon it can clock higher. This is the same for chips that come off the line that may be unstable at creatives reference 400mhz, but add more voltage and away they work at 400mhz. Tell me how thats stupid? Obviously you know nothing about silicon, transistor junction leakage, nor electronics.
And please tell me how higher thermal has anything to do with chip yield? The originals never got hot at all so how could that be it's
Nobody in the public will really know unless they pop the sinks off and compare numbers and measure the input core voltages on a sinked and unsinked card.Message Edited by spikestabber on 09-03-2006 05:8 AM

Error while transporting function grp from lower version to higher version

Dear Experts,
While transporting the function group and function modules from system A to system B, I am getting the below error
"Program SAPLZATSCSNG_EINB, Include LEINBF10: Syntax error in line 000068
Field 'GF_ETS_MODIFIED' is unknown. It is neitherin one of the specified tables nor defined by a 'D"
System A is a lower version SAP system and system B is a higher version. I compared the code of Include LEINBF10 in both the systems and there is a data declaration of field GF_ETS_MODIFIED in system B. But this is missing in system A.
Please guide me for this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Thankyou for your reply Rob.
Actually I am transporting the function group and modules from my development system to the client development system.
I dont have any other option but transport the files.
Is there any possibility to modify the include without applying a patch or upgrading my system?
Edited by: ShwetaD on Apr 15, 2010 10:24 PM

LenovoS10-3t Ideapad; Want to clean install Windows XP,current version:Windows7starter wont start

Hello! This is my first time visiting this forum, nice to meet you all. I have a LenovoS10-3t laptop that I purchased maybe 2 years or so ago, and have since bought myself a newer/faster laptop. I now let my son use the Lenovo for playing games, mostly World of warcraft and facebook things. The laptop is ridiculously slow, and has gotten even more so lately. It's been years since I've tinkered with anything technical, so I absent-mindedly decided to do a spur of the moment 'One-click-recovery' thinking it would restore the laptop to the condition it was in when I purchased it.... well several minutes into this recovery there was an error (I didn't save the code, not sure what happened...) and upon restarting the laptop, windows cannot start any longer! I receieve an error:
Windows failed to start. A recent hardware or software change might be the cause. (pic1)
They want me to insert the windows installation disk, which obviously didn't come with the laptop (remember, windows 7 starter edition) So my motherinlaw says she has a WindowsXP SP2 CD brand new at her house that I can have! Great! So I pop it in, boot up the laptop, change the BIOS to boot from USB drive CD (this particular laptop doesn't have a disk drive, so I have a USB external disk drive); Press F12 for boot menu; Press any key to boot from CD; Then a blue screen appears: Windows Setup. Setup is loading files (random files appearing in parenthesis)..... Then after 2-3 minutes: Setup is starting windows.... then a blue screen appears: A problem has been detected and windows has been shut down to prevent damage to your computer. If this is the first time you've seen this stop error screen, restart your computer. If this screen appears again follow these steps: Check for viruses on your computer. Remove any newly installed hard drives or hard drive controllers. Check your hard drive to make sure it is properly configured and terminated. Run CHKDSK /F to check for hard drive corruption, and then restart your computer. Technical Information: *** STOP: 0x0000007B (0xF7A8B524, 0xC0000034, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)
If anyone has any information or ideas to help me, basically I don't want to save/restore anything on the harddrive, I just want to wipe it clean and start fresh, hopefully with this windows XP since it's a 'full version' of windows compared to the old windows 7 starter.... so that way it's a faster more efficient laptop for my son to play his games on... Thanks in advance for any help/info/points in the right direction. Hopefully I gave enough information, I'm not great with computers these days so I tried not to leave anything out! =)
Solved!
Go to Solution.

kellyabobbyc, welcome to the forum,
the 7B error message you are receiving is due to the fact that XP doesn't have the SATA driver necessary for it to recognise the hard disc properly and continue with the installation.
One of the methods of getting around this problem would be to set the SATA mode to compatability in BIOS, the XP disc will then recognise the hard drive properly.
Hope this helps
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog

Version 7 improved compared to 4?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for