Version Compatibility

We have a running application which uses Weblogic Server 6.1. We wanted to download
an evaluation copy of 6.1 from one of our other centers to try and run the same
application. However, on going to the site I find that only 8.1 (or 7.0) is available
for downloading as an evaluation copy. Kindly confirm if the existing application
(which is currently running on 6.1) will continue to run without any problems
on Weblogic 8.1. If any other patch/software needs to be downloaded to make it
compatible, can u please provide us with the URL along with the patch names/software
names.
Regards,
V.Pradeep

Hi.
Yes, your application should be able to run without problems on WebLogic
8.1, unless your application use some of WebLogic APIs which may be
deplicated or changed in 8.1 :)
Regards,
Tinnapat.
"V Pradeep" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3e96bf0c$[email protected]..
>
We have a running application which uses Weblogic Server 6.1. We wanted todownload
an evaluation copy of 6.1 from one of our other centers to try and run thesame
application. However, on going to the site I find that only 8.1 (or 7.0)is available
for downloading as an evaluation copy. Kindly confirm if the existingapplication
(which is currently running on 6.1) will continue to run without anyproblems
on Weblogic 8.1. If any other patch/software needs to be downloaded tomake it
compatible, can u please provide us with the URL along with the patchnames/software
names.
Regards,
V.Pradeep

Similar Messages

  • Version compatibility  of 10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2  with  JDK 1.5.

    hi buddies,
    I want to know that whether
    10G Application Server 10.1.2.0.2 with JDK 1.5. is Version compatibility
    pls do send ur replies if known to you.

    Hi ,
    As far as I know AS 10.1.2.0.2 is Not certified with JDK 1.5.
    Please see below some links where you can double-check this
    1. OC4J with JDK 1.5 JSP compilation error
    2. http://docs.huihoo.com/oracle/docs/B14099_19/web.1012/b14011/chap1.htm
    "Only the JDK 1.3.1 and JDK 1.4 compilers are supported and certified by OC4J. It is possible to specify an alternative compiler by adding a <java-compiler> element to the server.xml file, and this might provide a workaround for the "classes not in packages" issue, but no other compilers are certified or supported by Oracle for use with OC4J."
    3. "Certified JDKs" from
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/ias/files/as_certification_r2_101202.html
    BR,
    Mihai

  • Version compatibility for installing WLS and ADR for ADF 11.1.2.0

    Hi,
    Can anyone pls let me know what versions of Weblogic server, Application Development Runtime (ADR) is required to install Oracle JDeveloper 11.1.2.0
    B'coz currently I am trying to install Weblogic server, ADR and ADF separately and try to deploy and publish an application in ADF 11.1.2.0 verison.
    I am trying this for the past 4 days, but still can't deploy an application successfully in ADF 11.1.2.0 version. Pls let me know the version compatibility.
    Thanks,
    Aparna

    Hi John,
    Even I saw the link that u had mentioned. From where can I install these ?
    I had downloaded WLS 10.3.5 and ADR 11.1.1.5 separately. But from where do I install the patch ?? I didn't find a proper source to download.
    Pls help.
    Thanks,
    Aparna

  • NWDI version compatibility

    Hi,
    Does anyone know if there are any version compatibility constraints developing Java WebDynpro applications on an NWDI (WAS6.40) for deployment on a WAS7.00 instance (e.g. JDK's)?
    I've yet to find a general recommendation similar to that seen for SLD (i.e. keep in line with the highest WAS version on the estate) or any clear documentation on version compatibility across WAS stacks with respect to NWDI.
    We have a highly complex landscape with multiple component/ product versions, and we'd prefer to have a singel central NWDI instance, but I'm not sure if this is practical and/ or possible.
    Any pointers/ documentation/ comments gratefully received
    Cheers
    Neil

    While I can't remember where I've seen it, SAP does recommend that the DI always be kept patched to the latest levels, regardless of what version your landscape (or pieces thereof ) is at.
    So, as long as your DI is at patched to at least the same level as your most 'advanced' system, you should not have any problem.  You should also match your Developer Studio to the same level as your target system to avoid using any plug-ins that offer features not offered by the eventual runtime system.  Yes, the required libraries will be ok (as long as you configure the SLD and the associated track correctly), but the Developer Studio itself needs to be matched up.
    Hope that makes sense.

  • Photoshop Extended version compatability

    I have Photoshop CS3 Extended on both PC (Windows XP) and Mac (OS X Leopard). I'm able to upgrade the PC to CS5 Extended but not the Mac.
    My questions are:
    1 - Will Photoshop CS5 extended work on Windows XP?
    2 - Are CS3 and CS5 backwards compatible - if I work on a document in PC CS5 will the Mac CS5 version be able to open it? I know there will be some things that would not translate backwards, such as Puppet Warp and some of the newer masking and layers features, but I'd still like to be able to work on more basic functions of masking, cloning, etc. on both computers.
    Thanks for any help,
    Marcy

    Noel Car boni wrote:
    For the most part, a document saved from Photoshop CS5 will be no problem to open in CS3.  There's a "Maximize Compatibility" setting in Edit - Preferences - File Handling section that you'll want to set to "Always".
    -Noel
    My take is that the compatibility setting should be set based on the kind of work one does.  I have it set to  "Never".  When you check this setting ON you tell Photoshop to save along with all your layers another entity, which is a flattened version of the image. This, makes every PSD file you save larger by a non trival amount.
    So this setting should have no effect regarding Photoshop to Photoshop version compatibility. All Photoshop versions understand layers and do not need a flattened version.  It's intended to maximize the compatibility between Photoshop and any other program  that does not know about  layers but reads PSD files. If you have many of your PSD files going to, for example,  Lightroom or Premiere then set it to "Always". If not, you can set it to "Ask" or "Never" and save yourself a lot of storage space.
    Paulo

  • Re: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Fortev30L2 on D

    Dirk:
    I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
    it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
    -cflags "-oldcxx only"
    Dwayne Kryger
    "Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
    To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
    cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
    Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
    Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
    G'day Folxs
    Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
    a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
    with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
    access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
    I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
    box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
    drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
    interfacing to existing web pages!
    NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
    TIA,
    /[:-)irK
    Dirk Haben, Perth WA
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

    Dirk:
    I ran into a similar problem. I added an other flag to my fcompile script and
    it seems to be working fine, your mileage may vary. The flag was
    -cflags "-oldcxx only"
    Dwayne Kryger
    "Haben, Dirk" <[email protected]> on 08/25/99 02:09:16 AM
    To: "'Soapbox Forte Users'" <[email protected]>
    cc: (bcc: Dwayne Kryger/SEH)
    Subject: (forte-users) C++ version compatibility question. Forte v30L2 on
    Digital Unix 4 d and C++ version ???
    G'day Folxs
    Just installed Forte as a Simple Server on a Digital UNIX (v4.0d) box (being
    a VMSbot it was much easier than I thought). We want to use it to interface
    with an existing web client. The Forte part is to provide us a scalable
    access path to Oracle DBs on the VMS machine; already running Forte.
    I'm having trouble finding media that contains C++ v5.4.-006 for the Unix
    box. Does anyone know of/has used higher versions of C++ without too much
    drama? How about v5.7 or even v6.1? We will be using extensive C++
    interfacing to existing web pages!
    NB: The current web system client is compiled using EGCS 2.91.66.
    TIA,
    /[:-)irK
    Dirk Haben, Perth WA
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.sageit.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: [email protected]

  • WAP54G Version compatibility

    I am trying to create a wireless bridge between a network with ip's 198.1.1.xxx (this network has the gateway) to a network with ip's 198.1.2.xxx -  so that it can access the internet thru the gateway).  Both AP's are WAP54G set to bridge mode. Both are configured identically except for the IP numbers.  SSID broadcast disabled and security off.  From everything I have read, I should be able to ping (example 4.2.2.2) from 198.1.2.xxx - but cannot.  The only difference I can see it that one of the WAP54G's is version 2 and the other is Version 3.  Both have firmware 3.0.4.
    Question: Can anyone confirm that I can or cannot create a wireless bridge with differing versions of the same device?
    As a plan B, I have on order a WET200.  Should I have two on order to act as a matched pair as the WAP54G's had to be?
    Thank you.
    Craig

    I work with psd, indd and illu/eps files. I've heard the weird argument that "cause of new features it's not possible to be version compatible, but that's down right silly. Text on top of an image should be readable in any version. Even with a copule of adjustment layers it should be no problems with version compatibility. That Adobe choose to lock and force is another story. I guess I will be sticking to my CS6 version in the years to come. I paid a lot of money for that Master Collection. I also corresponde files with many CS4 users on the client side.

  • RoboHelp Version Compatibility

    Hello everybody from Greece,
    I want to ask about version compatibility. I've got RoboHelp
    HTML 5.0.2 and my client has RoboHelp HTML 3.1. He asks if I can
    compile his project, but I wnt to know if he will be able to work
    with the project that I will work with in version 5.0.2.
    Is there a way to save the project to an older version?
    Is there a compatibility problem in general?
    Is there going to be a problem if I compile the project in
    the newer version? (Will he see any differences?)
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Tansou and υποδοχή,
    You should be able to open up the X3.1 in X5.02 without a
    problem. X5 will preserve all the feature used in X3.1. Are you
    compiling HTML Help? My guess is that you won't see any difference
    in the output when you compile.
    However, the problem comes when you try and do this the other
    way around. Robohelp is not backward compatible. So you won't be
    able to pass a modified project back to your client. Rick the
    robowizard has a few tricks to help with backward compatibility if
    you don't mind going under the hood. However, not sure if this
    works with X3.1 jumping to X3.1.
    What type of output are you generating?
    Hope that helps
    Craig

  • Adobe Reader version compatability

    I have a PDF that is compatible with Adobe reader 11.0.2 and I have version 11.0.5 currently installed.  Version 11.0.5 won't open the PDF.  How can I open this PDF? Do I need to specifically download version 11.0.2?
    Thanks for any help!

    I can open Reader on its own.  I am trying to download a grant application and when I click on the link that is supposed to open it through Reader it says that Reader is not compatible and that I need to install the latest version of the PDF viewer.  When I click on the link to install the latest version it send me to the Reader installation.  I have installed and tried reinstalling Reader and it hasn't helped.  In the instructions for the grant it only talks about compatability for versions up to 11.0.2 that's why I wasn't sure if maybe the problem is because I have 11.0.5. 

  • Adobe AIR version compatibility

    Hi,
    I am trying to run my application built in Flex Builder 3 and
    compatibility with Adobe AIR beta 3 on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e. latest
    version 1.0.7.4880); but its not working. It gives "This
    application requires a version of Adobe AIR which is no longer
    supported. Please contact the application author for an updated
    version."
    So is there any solution for this, that i can run my Adobe
    AIR beta 3 compatible application on Adobe AIR 1.0 (i.e.
    1.0.7.4880)?
    Thanks,
    vijayataV

    No, AIR applications that target Beta 3 can only be run on
    Beta 3. To target the 1.0 release, you must migrate your
    application. In most cases, this only requires changing the
    namespace in the application descriptor to refer to 1.0.
    Oliver Goldman | Adobe AIR Engineering

  • Discoverer version compatable with 8.1.7

    We are currently upgrading from 7.3 to 8.1.7, and I am wondering if the current version of Discoverer will still be compatable. What I am looking for is for someone to tell me what versions of Discoverer are compatable with 8.1.7 of the database or point me to a page on the Oracle web site.
    Cheers

    Pl open an SR with Support for this issue
    Srini

  • Lightroom, Bridge, Photoshop version compatibility

    I am now using Lightroom 1.1 and also have Photoshop CS2 (version 9.0.2), Bridge CS2 and of course Camera Raw (version ?)installed on my Windows XP computer. My question is, do I have to upgrade to Photoshop CS3 and Camera Raw 4 for compatibility with Lightroom? Also, how do I know which version of Camera Raw is installed?
    PB

    Lightroom has its own version of Camera RAW. The only reason you'd need to upgrade to CS3 is to get the latest version of Camera RAW, and the only reason you'd need to do that is if you want to be able to open the images you edit in Lightroom in Camera RAW and still have all the edits in place. You can open the image itself (processed through Lightroom) in Photoshop will all the edits in place regardless of what version you are using (I use Elements 3.0).

  • NWDS version compatibility !!

    Dear Friends,
    I would like to pose a simple question on the compatiblity of the NWDS version with my Portal version
    My client set up has Portal version of NW 7.0.1 SP3 .The information i get from the SLD has the following info
    Software Components all components...
    Name Version Applied
    sap.com/SAP-JEECOR 7.01 SP3 (1000.7.01.3.0.20081208163400) 20090713142753
    sap.com/SAP-JEE 7.01 SP3 (1000.7.01.3.0.20081208163400) 20090713142549
    Now the client says it has an NWDS version with 7.01.03
    Now we need to set up a system at offshore as well.I couldnt find an NWDS version of the afore said 7.01.03 so i got NWDS 7.1 EHP1 SP4 Preview version from SDN .I would like to ask you if this version is compatible with the NW 7.0.1 SP3. You can also suggest me a more compatible version of NWDS or a place in SDN where i can look up for the compatibility between NWDS and the NW .
    Kindly do the needful.

    Hi Nishita,
    I agree with Gilles... You can not use NWDS 7.1 for your portal 7.0.1. it wont support.
    Always see to it that ur portal version matches with NWDS (even lower version of NWDS works).
    For confirmation check below threads...
    /thread/1551768 [original link is broken]
    NWDS Compatability issue
    Thanks,
    pradeeP

  • Version compatibility issues

    After installing 2.0, will Encore projects from previous versions open seamlessly into 2.0? I'm in the middle of a large project--is it safe to change horses mid-stream?
    Julie

    You guys really never had any problems with 1.0 or 1.5? 2 out of 3 friends of mine (professional DVD authors, as myself), had to abandon Encore because of bugs. And yes, as a programmer, I certainly do know when a program has bugs, as opposed to my own errors. I'm not saying I have never had problems that weren't my own fault, obviously I have.
    Encore 1.51, on an ongoing basis would randomly corrupt files, menus, subtitles etc., which caused me to do over days of work more than once. Almost everyone I know has had these corruption problems, and I have seen it mentioned in these forums many times. These problems happened on at least 6 different PCs, with Encore being reinstalled on some of the machines a couple of times. Drivers/compability issues don't apply to most of the problems (for instance simply closing a working project and then reopening it the next day, and it becoming corrupt, wouldn't be a compatibility issue). I use many high-end animation programs, graphic design tools and interactive media creation tools without problems like I have witnesssed with Encore.
    As for subtitling issues - I thought that was clear how I knew that the fault was within Encore and not the user. I'm not talking about simple overlap issues and incorrect coding issues, which I have had, I'm talking about Encore deleting all subtitles throughout the project, once you completed adding them.
    Question for those that disagree with me, who say that Encore 1.51 works great - have any of you done really in-depth interactive projects? (I am asking seriously, not sarcastically) For instance, I did not have problems on simple DVDs with 2 or 3 menus and 10 or 11 linked videos. When Encore seemed to start corrupting my files was when I was working on educational DVDs with 30-40 menus, 50+ linked videos, with each video having subtitles in english and spanish, as well as audio in English and Spanish. {Encore advertises that all this should not be a problem]. So I'm asking seriously - has anyone worked on really complicated projects, with many subtitle and audio tracks, that took weeks or months to complete - without any corruption problems? I'd actually like to know - I'm not putting it out there to be rude.
    If Adobe can admit that since 1.0 and 1.5 were early versions of the product, and, not surprisingly, had some issues which have now been fixed, then I'll gladly upgrade. If Adobe's official position is that Encore NEVER had any bugs, and the only possible errors were on the user end, then I am not interested in upgrading.

  • Version Compatibility Frustration

    Hello,
    Development would be so much easier if J2ME CDC was compatible with J2SE1.4. When will the CDC 1.1 be complete (JSR218)?
    I'm new to J2ME development and have had good success with some prototypes (CDC 1.0.1). One of the significant reasons for choosing Java is the wealth of APIs available from Sun and from open source projects. However, I keep running into roadblocks caused by version incompatibilities. Although some have options for backward compatibility, most APIs seem to favor being built with v1.4. This is an issue for us because of attempts to make portions of our application portable between an embedded WinCE device, desktop, and server. To top if off, Sun is pushing J2SE 5.0. I'm stuck trying to make things work with v1.3 !!! We will probably end up with .NET for all of it.
    Thanks for reading my rant.

    Rob,
    This is mmore of a question to you than a response to your rants... rants are therapeutical though...
    You seem to be already developing in the CVM/CDC/J2ME/etc. environment.
    I have a client for whom I need to develop an app for a Windows CE3.0 platform.
    What, in total, do I need to do this? I've already downloaded the j2me_cdcfp-1_0_1-fcs-src-b12-linux-i686-14_May_2002.zip file. What else do I need to do this? Is there any special licensing, other software downloads, supporting files?
    I posted this question a few days ago on this forum but haven't yet received any replies and I need to get hot on this.
    Your help would be appreciated.

  • WCS & WLC version compatibility

    Are there any compatibility issues between WCS version 7.0.164.0 and WLC version 7.0.116.0?

    Hi Jason,
    Table 1     WCS Versions 
    WCS Version Supported Controller Versions Supported Location Server Versions Supported MSE Versions Release Date Upgrade Supported From Operating System Requirement
    7.0.172.0
    7.0.116.0
    7.0.98.218
    7.0.98.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.199.4
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    4.2.209.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.202.0
    7.0.201.0
    April 2011
    7.0.164.3
    7.0.164.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    7.0.164.3
    7.0.98.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.199.4
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    4.2.209.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.103.0
    7.0.105.0
    December 2010
    7.0.164.0
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    7.0.164.0
    7.0.98.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.199.4
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    4.2.209.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.103.0
    7.0.105.0
    June 2010
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.199.4
    6.0.199.0 (pulled from CCO)
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    4.2.209.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.202.0
    6.0.202.0
    April 2011
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.199.4
    6.0.199.0 (pulled from CCO)
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    4.2.209.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.102.0
    6.0.105.0
    15 July 2010
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    6.0.181.0
    6.0.196.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.101.0
    6.0.103.0
    17 Feb 2010
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    6.0.170.0
    6.0.188.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.97.0
    6.0.97.0
    8 Nov 2009
    6.0.132.0
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    6.0.132.0
    6.0.182.0
    6.0.108.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    6.0.85.0
    6.0.85.0
    11 June 2009
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.2.148.0
    5.2.193.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.2.100.0
    5.2.100.0
    25 June 2009
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.2.130.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.2.91.0
    5.2.91.0
    21 Feb 2009
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.2.125.0
    5.2.178.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.2.91.0
    5.2.91.0
    10 Feb 2009
    5.2.110.0
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.64.0
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.2.110.0
    5.2.157.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.2.91.0
    5.2.91.0
    24 Nov 2008
    5.1.64.0
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.1
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.1.65.4
    5.1.163.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.1.35.0
    5.1.35.0
    9 Jan 2009
    5.1.64.0
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.x
    RHEL 5.x
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.1.64.0
    5.1.151.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.173.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    5.1.30.0
    5.1.30.0
    21 July 2008
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.1
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.0.72.0
    5.0.148.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.38.0
    Not Applicable
    5 Aug 2008
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.1
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.0.56.2
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.x.x
    4.0.33.0
    Not Applicable
    14 Apr 2008
    5.0.56.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    5.0.56.0
    5.0.148.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.x.x
    4.0.32.0
    Not Applicable
    16 Feb 2008
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.128.0
    4.2.207.0
    4.2.205.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.43.0
    Not Applicable
    13 May 2009
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0
    RHEL 5.0 (5.1 and later no supported)
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.110.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.42.0
    Not Applicable
    29 Sep 2008
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.97.0
    4.2.176.0
    4.2.130.0
    4.2.112.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.38.0
    Not Applicable
    3 Jun 2008
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.81.0
    4.2.99.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.36.0
    Not Applicable
    17 Mar 2008
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0
    RHEL 5.0
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.62.11
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.35.0
    Not Applicable
    25 Jan 2008
    4.2.62.0
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0 Update 5
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    4.2.62.0
    4.2.61.0
    4.1.185.0
    4.1.171.0
    4.0.216.0
    4.0.206.0
    4.0.179.11
    4.0.179.8
    4.0.155.0
    3.1.35.0
    Not Applicable
    9 Nov 2007
    4.1.91.0
    4.1.83.0
    4.0.100.0
    4.0.97.0
    4.0.96.0
    4.0.87.0
    4.0.81.0
    4.0.66.0
    Windows 2003 SP2 32-bit
    RHEL 4.0 Update 5
    Windows/ RHEL on ESX 3.0.1 and above
    No support for 64 bit
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/release/notes/WCS_RN7_0_172.html
    Cheers!
    Rob
    PS: +5 to my friend Leo using the invisible Stars

Maybe you are looking for

  • GDI/Driver error in rendering - XP Service Pack 2

    Hi There We are having an issue with XP SP2. After the installation, ip based printing worked fine, but Queue based print broke. Broke: -Print jobs sit in local machine queue. Windows system event logs return the following errors in order. 1.) Docume

  • How to call the abap program in workflow

    HI Exeprts, I need to call one abap program in workflow. can any tell me how to call the abap program in workflow. thanks &regards ramesh

  • ORACLE 9i-illegal get command

    HELP HELP New to Oracle 9i, learning to use database and sql*plus. It took 2 weeks to download (issues) and 1 week to create and password correctly sql to make some practice tables. The tables are created in notepad and when I try to open them -- 1.

  • InfoViewBranding changes not showing

    Hello, I followed steps below for branding changes on 4.1 but I cannot get changes to show. Below are steps I've done. 1.) Unpackaged com.businessobjects.webpath.InfoViewBranding.jar 2.) Made my changes to customize.css and added my images and remove

  • My ipad isnt fully recognized on my pc laptop running windows 8 pro

    When I plug my ipad2.4 into my laptop it only allows me to check my (DCIM) picture folder but doesn't recognize nothing else thru the usb. So I can't load it up to put music from itunes or anything else for that matter. Can someone help me to resolve