Version conflict while targeting a vi to RT engine

When i am targeting a vi to Labview RT engine the message "Version Conflicts between Host Labview and RT engines" is coming.
I am using a CFP-2100 and want to run a vi on it. (No PC should be connected with it)
After targetting how will i execute it on CFP? is it automatically executable?
Please reply me
--Alok Trivedi
Pune
-AL☼K

Thanx for replying me so soon.
I am still stucked with the problem.
I have Labview 7.0 installed on my computer and where i am making a vi which is to b loaded into CFP - 2100.
Here are other versions i am using.....
Field point VI manager 3.1.0
Field point Drivers 5.1.0
Data socket for Labview Real Time 4.2
Labview Real Time 7.1
NI-Irda RT 1.0.1
NI-Serial RT 2.5.4
NI-VISA 3.2
NI-Watchdog 2.1.2
When i switch the execution target to RT engine for remote device and enter the machine IP address it shows me "Version Conflict while targeting a VI to RT engine".
I talked to Rahul about this and he well told me how to repair version conflicts between Host machine and RT engine. I went to remote machine and by right clicking on "software" installed all the versions to remote machine according to the host machine.
the interesting thing is here it's not showing any version mismatch all the versions shown above are same as the host machine......but whenever i try to target the execution to RT engine it shows the version conflict.
now what all questionis running in my mind are :
1. Why the version conflict is occuring?
2. If I get succeed to targeting the execution of vi onto RT engine how would i install it to CFP, if i just copy and paste it via FTP how will it know what vi is to run? i think we'r missing some way to "install" the vi into CFP.
3 What is "RT Communication wizard for".......why it makes 3 other vi's....
4. what are the total ways to run a vi onto CFP
Waiting for your reply...
thanks again
-Alok Trivedi
Pune
-AL☼K

Similar Messages

Target fieldpoint connection failed due to version conflicts

I have set up a small network of fieldpoint (fp-2015) and laptop with Ethernet. Then, I have succesfully configured this fp with MAX and downloaded the iak file to it. Now, I want to target the labview RT of this fp. However, the the connection failed with following message "Version Conflicts between host labview and RT Engine". I'm using Labview 7.1 released in August.

It sounds like the FP-2015 that you have has an older version of software on it (probably LabVIEW 7.0). To upgrade the software on the FP-2015, first launch Measurement & Automation Explorer. Locate the FP-2015 under Remote Systems. Right click on the software item and select Install Software. This will allow you to install the new software image and upgrade the controller to LabVIEW 7.1. Note: You will need FieldPoint Explorer 4.1 which shipped with LabVIEW 7.1. If you have an older version of FieldPoint Explorer, it will not have the 7.1 image for the FieldPoint controller.
Regards,
Aaron

Possible version conflict, sending purchase order to SUS in MM-SUS scenario

We are currently trying to get the MM-SUS scenario working. In this
scenario, we create a purchase order in the ERP/MM system. The
purchase order is then transferred into SUS via XI/PI.
After creating a purchase order in the MM system, the purchase order
reaches the SUS system, but then errors-out in the SUS system upon
posting. The specific error is paraphrased as follows:
No interface action for sender or receiver found (from Trace)
PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA
CX_ST_MATCH_ELEMENT
System expected the element http://sap.com/xi/SAPGlobal20/Global;
PurchaseOrderRequest
We suspect a version conflict. The SUS version is 7.01. The XI/PI
system is version 7.11.
Can you confirm or rule-out a version conflict?
The Integration Builder scenario we are using is Plan
Driven Procurement with Supplier Enablement.
We have tryed many variations in Integration Builder, but all
produce errors in SUS. The test tool in Integration Builder also shows errors
for certain message types. The message type ORDERS.ORDERS02
needed to be added manually, and did not come along with the scenario.
Edited by: Bill Guderian on Mar 19, 2010 4:53 PM

Any clue from here.
Note 936003 - ERS Invoice causes conversion error within SRM
When the SRM system attempts to process an ERS Invoice sent from the MM backend, a PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR fault is thrown.
Other terms
CX_ST_DESERIALIZATION_ERROR PARSE_APPLICATION_DATA SUS SRM EBP ERS Invoice XI Exchange Infrastructure Mapping
Reason and Prerequisites
This error will occur when the IDOC does not have a VPREI value; it is the result of an error within the divide logic of the XI mapping operation. This operation is performed within the XI system. A calculation of NETWR/MENGE is performed; however, the result is not properly formatted. As such, 72.30/10 produces a result of 7.2300002. This value is too long for the inbound SRM proxy and hence the error is thrown.
Solution
The solution to this problem is to add a FORMATNUM function within the XI mapping operation. This restricts the result to 2 decimal places, which adheres to the definition of the inbound proxy.
Step by step directions on how one implements the FORMATNUM function are as follows:
1. Log into the XI system with SAPGUI
2. Start the Integration Builder:Design tool (for steps on how to do this, review the steps below):
    a. Run transaction sxmb_ifr
    b. This will cause a browser to come up. Select the Integration Repository link
3. In the left pane, select the Objects tab
4. Navigate to the SAP SRM SERVER ' SAP SRM SERVER 5.0 ' http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global --> Mapping Objects --> Message Mappings folder
5. Double-click on MM2SUSInvoice
6. The right pane will display the mapping object
7. Select Edit mode
8. In the box that contains the output (Message Type: InvoiceRequest), navigate to InvoiceRequest ' Invoice ' Item ' Price ' NetUnitPrice
9. Double-click on the Amount element and you should see the mapping, represented graphically in the bottom pane
10. In the status line of the graphical editor, select Arithmetic from the list box:
11. To the right of the listbox, scroll until you see the FormatNum function
12. Click on FormatNum, which will cause the function to be added to the graphical editor. You may drag the box as desired
13. Select the connection that binds the if/then/else to the Amount box by grabbing the arrow within the input of the Amount
14. Release the drag of the connection while over the input to the FormatNum box. This will reassign the output of the if/then/else to the input of FormatNum
15. Create a connection between the output of the FormatNum box and the input of the Amount box. You accomplish this by clicking within the output and releasing within the input (respectively).
16. Save the modified mapping object
17. Activate the changes
    a. In the left pane, select the Change Lists tab
    b. Navigate to the Standard Change List entry
    c. Right-click the Standard Change List entry and select Activate
    d. Select only MM2SUSInvoice if more than one item is available, and press the Activate button
18. This will complete the required modification.

File Transport: Version conflict.

Hi,
I have a doubt on a particular scenario while transporting object from QA to PRD using File transport.
I have exported a tpz file say 1.tpz from QA with say the following objects
Obj_1(ver 1.0)
Obj_2(ver 1.0)
Obj_3(ver 1.0)
Now before this 1.tpz is imported in PRD few more changes happend to Obj_3 and I exported again a file say 2.tpz
Now this 2.tpz has only Obj_3(ver 2.0)
Now the basis has by mistake Imported this 2.tpz file before importing the 1.tpz file. SO in my PRD the object Obj_3 is existing with a advance version i.e 2.0
Now my doubt is can we Import 1.tpz now in PRD and then again import 2.tpz ?
I am having a feeling that we will definately get in version conflict. Even if I ignore the warning during transport and go ahead with this procedure of importing 1.tpz and then 2.tpz again, will it impact my scenarios.
I am lookign for a quick suggestions.
Regards,
Rahul.

Hi Rahul,
If you import V1 file first & later V2, it will not impact on your scenarion & you wil be able to see latest object in PRD.
But V2 is already imported so import of V1 may not be successful.
You may generate a new export if possible & transport this. It should include all object with their lastest version.
Regards
Sushil

Help with x64: fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'X86' conflicts with target machine type 'x64'

Hello, I am trying to complie some C code for some applications I am working on in labview (I am using Labview 2012 64bit).
When I try to build my code in Visual C++ 2010 ( I have set it up to be able to use x64) I get the following fatal error:
nivision.lib(StartupShutdown.obj) : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'X86' conflicts with target machine type 'x64'
Which I understand that .lib does not have a 64bit compatability. However, if I were to use 32bit code, how can I link/emulate it to my 64bit labview? Is there a good tutorial on this application? The problem is the rest of my application uses and requires 64bit labview, so I am stuck in this enviroment.
Thanks.

dbrittain wrote:
Thanks for the reply. The C code I have cross correlates images, and it does reference the image inputs and size variables from the nivision classes. I am thinking of using a side by side labview environment with shared variables. I have not done this before, do you have any good examples? Can you make the library function node a shared variable or only the elements within it?
I guess I could try to convert to labview, but the are a lot of lines of code that I would prefer not to try to wrap my head around in translation.
The LabVIEW API in Vision Development Module has functions that let you get access to all those parameters as well as the raw image data pointer. A common design is to query those items on the LabVIEW diagram and then pass them to your DLL. This would mean you wouldn't need to make any calls into the Vision DLL from your C code.
As for examples showing how to use shared variables, keep in mind that it isn't just like doing a function call. The more appropriate way to think of it would be communicating with another VI by getting and setting controls and indicators while it runs. You could put all your arguments into a shared variable and set a boolean indicating it is ready, then wait for another boolean to go high indicating the other code has finished and placed its results in another shared variable. Your application code interacts with the shared variables just like a control/indicator/local variable. This of course is a simple description and I would not be surprised if there are well-defined frameworks/examples searchable in the forums that use shared variables in this manner.
Eric
Eric

ERROR: Invalid java version found: while runing Autoconfig

Hi
while upgrading EBS 12.1.3 Database from 11.1.0.7 to 11.2.0.2
We got the below error on autoconfig.
F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\appsutil>F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbho
me_1\appsutil\bin\adconfig.cmd contextfile=prod_srv-moc.xml
Enter the APPS user password: apps
cygwin warning:
MS-DOS style path detected: F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\appsutil\bin
\adconfig.pl
Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/f/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
appsutil/bin/adconfig.pl
CYGWIN environment variable option "nodosfilewarning" turns off this warning.
Consult the user's guide for more details about POSIX paths:
    http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames
The log file for this session is located at: F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome
_1/appsutil/log/prod_srv-moc/02040321/adconfig.log
AutoConfig is configuring the Database environment...
AutoConfig will consider the custom templates if present.
        Using ORACLE_HOME location : F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1
ERROR: Invalid java version found:
        sh: F:appmocppdproduct11.2.0dbhome_1jdkjre/bin/java: No such file or dir
ectory
ERROR: Invalid java version found:
        sh: F:appmocppdproduct11.2.0dbhome_1jdkjre/bin/java: No such file or dir
ectory
        Classpath                   :
sh: - : invalid option
Usage: sh [GNU long option] [option] ...
        sh [GNU long option] [option] script-file ...
GNU long options:
        --debug
        --debugger
        --dump-po-strings
        --dump-strings
        --help
        --init-file
        --login
        --noediting
        --noprofile
        --norc
        --posix
        --protected
        --rcfile
        --restricted
        --verbose
        --version
        --wordexp
Shell options:
        -irsD or -c command or -O shopt_option          (invocation only)
        -abefhkmnptuvxBCHP or -o option
Version Conflicts among development maintained and customized templates encounte
red; aborting AutoConfig run.
The logfile for this session is located at: F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_
1/appsutil/log/prod_srv-moc/02040321/adconfig.logThanks
Nawneet

Hi Helios,
I have changed the prod_srv-moc.xml script and executed the script.
And now i got the below error.
F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\appsutil>F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbho
me_1\appsutil\bin\adconfig.cmd contextfile=prod_srv-moc.xml
Enter the APPS user password: apps
cygwin warning:
MS-DOS style path detected: F:\app\mocppd\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\appsutil\bin
\adconfig.pl
Preferred POSIX equivalent is: /cygdrive/f/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/
appsutil/bin/adconfig.pl
CYGWIN environment variable option "nodosfilewarning" turns off this warning.
Consult the user's guide for more details about POSIX paths:
http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using.html#using-pathnames
The log file for this session is located at: F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome
_1/appsutil/log/prod_srv-moc/02040605/adconfig.log
AutoConfig is configuring the Database environment...
AutoConfig will consider the custom templates if present.
Using ORACLE_HOME location : F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
Classpath : :F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/jdb
c/lib/ojdbc6.jar:F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/appsutil/java/xmlparserv2
.jar:F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/appsutil/java:F:/app/mocppd/product/1
1.2.0/dbhome_1/jlib/netcfg.jar:F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1/jlib/ldapjc
lnt11.jar
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: oracle/apps/ad/tools/
configuration/VersionConflictListGenerator
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: oracle.apps.ad.tools.configuration.
VersionConflictListGenerator
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(Unknown Source)
Could not find the main class: oracle.apps.ad.tools.configuration.VersionConflic
tListGenerator. Program will exit.
ERROR: Version Conflicts utility failed.
Terminate.
The logfile for this session is located at: F:/app/mocppd/product/11.2.0/dbhome_
1/appsutil/log/prod_srv-moc/02040605/adconfig.log
Thanks
Nawneet

Only Remaining var. in version 0 - no target cost for order

Hi,
I am getting the error message "Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs for 000060003328" while performing the Variance Calculation in KKS2 transaaction.
The order is having status DLV and TECO.
Kidny give your suggestions
Thanks and regards
Murugesan

Got answer from Financials forum

Datapump version conflict

hi....
we have a requirement of exporting all the scehma object.............from 11.1.0.6.0 to 10.2.0.1...with the help of
datapump utility......
previously that database was migrated from SQLserver to oracle 11.1.0.6.0..(with lot of efforts ofcourse)
one thing which is bothering me is that there are lot of warning generated in the stored procedure while conversion...so, will there be any issue once the export and import is finished cause of error acompanied procedures???..
and another thing is that i have been suggested from the forum itself that i have to use the datapump utility of the same version on the target database as the versions are differing here...
so i m sort of confused which verion's datapump utility will be used where???
is it possible that datapump utility of 11.1.0.6.0 can be used on 10.2.0.1.0 or vice versa??
thnaks for the support
regards...

expdp help=y or reading documentation will show the
version=
clause, which allows the export to be in a lower version.
Kindly refrain from asking questions for which you can find the answer yourself without effort.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

How do I correct version conflicts between host and RT engine?

I was running LabVIEW RT7.0 on a host PC (WinXP) and PXI-8145 system. I installed LV7.1 and LVRT7.1 on the host. However, the software versions in MAX still report as 7.0
I would like to upgrade to 7.1 on my 8145-RT. I cannot run 7.1 on the host and target the 7.0 RT engine (results in version conflict). Version 7.0 is installed on C:, but 7.1 is installed on D: due to space.
How can I get MAX to recognize my latest version (which should allow my to download it to the PXI)?
Thanks.
Laine

Thank you for the response.
C:\RT Images contains only a single folder for NI-PAL
However, I backed it up and copied the RT Images folder from D:, but still the same effect (MAX thinks 7.0 is the latest LabVIEW version).
D:\RT Images\LabVIEW\7.0 contains subfolders and install scripts (e.g., 7002.rts)
D:\RT Images\LabVIEW\7.1 contains subfolders but no install scripts. Also, there are many fewer files in these subfolders than in the 7.0 folder. I'm worried about trying to manually install from the 7.1 folder.
Any other suggestions? Thanks.
Laine

Version conflicts between host labview and RT engine

there is problem that i cannt switch target to feild point. It said that "version conflicts between host labview and RT engine" . But my labview is version 7.0 and the real time module is version 7.0 too. Anyone can give me hand? Thanks

Depending on your version of MAX, you should be able to change the version on the FP (in remote systems). If you can't do it in 3.0, try upgrading to 3.1 (you will have to search for it on the site). If that doesn't work, you can try resetting to factory default and then see if you can do this.
Another tip, which for some reason seems to help, is updating the OS\Run-Time Engine when windows is in safe mode.
Try these and see if they help.
BTW, as a tip for next time, you're more likely to get a good answer for something like this if you post in the FieldPoint board.
Try to take over the world!

MySQL conflicts while synchronizing

I am getting the following exception
javax.sql.rowset.spi.SyncProviderException: 286 conflicts while synchronizing
when i do an acceptChanges on a mysql database.
It only happens when a time/date/datetime field is null. Am I doing something work or is this a bug?
Anyone have any suggestions on how to fix this?
My environment is as follows
Tomcat 5.5.9
Java Version: 1.5.0_05-b05
MySQL 4.1.14-nt
OS Name: Windows XP
OS Arch: x86
OS Version: 5.1

You are setting it to NULL or it is NULL already? Can't you work around this.. by making it not NULL? I can't say if it is a bug or not I really don't know but it seems easily fixable.

DAQmx version conflict preventing deployment

Hi all,
After installing LV2010 on both my dev machine and my RT target (rt desktop running Pharlap), I am unable to deploy DAQmx tasks to the target. The error message suggests that the deployment problem is related to a daqmx version conflict between the two systems, but looking at the software lists in Measurement and Automation Explorer (v4.7) both show components for DAQmx 9.5.1. I've reinstalled the daqmx components on both systems and have not gotten any different behavior. Anyone else having this problem or know of anything else to try?
Thanks,
tHa
CLAD

In grasping at straws I also noticed that the entries visible under the Software tree in MAX Explorer do not match those that appear in the dialog box when I select "Add/Remove" software. Maybe my system is using the wrong version of daqmx when it tries to deploy?
I've also been able to successfully run the tasks from the Explorer window.
CLAD

Resolving version conflict

1)Developer1,(Client as Client1)creted Hello.java file chked in now the version is 1.0
2)Developer2,(Client as -
) checked out synched edited Hello.java file chked in version is 2.0
Now both the developers checked out the version2.0 Devloper1 cheked in while developer2 got checkin conflict.
Assume that by some means he deleted client,he wont remeber what client name he has given. How to merge this conflict.

How can he check-in and get a version conflict if he doesn't have a client? Checking in is only possible if you have a client.
Message was edited by: Pascal Willemsen

Version conflicts and similarities..

is it that supposing i have a version of Dev2000 Ver6 then i
have to have the same version of Designer2000 ie Ver6 only?
or else there will be a version conflict or probably the product
might not install??
I have Oracle 8i Personal Edition.
Dev2000 Ver 6
Des2000 Ver 2.1
but Des2000 fails to install in the ORACLE_HOME directory after
Dev2000 is installed.

You are a very astute person, jdhore! Thank you very much!
q ~ $ pacman -Syu
:: Synchronizing package databases...
testing is up to date
core is up to date
extra is up to date
community is up to date
unstable is up to date
archlinuxfr is up to date
gianvito is up to date
archlinux.pl is up to date
lnf is up to date
tango is up to date
:: Starting full system upgrade...
:: Replace bluez-libs with testing/bluez? [Y/n] n
:: Replace gtk-engines with gianvito/gtk-engines-svn? [Y/n] n
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (4): ncurses-5.6-8 ntfs-3g-1.2812-1 qt-4.4.1-3 xine-lib-1.1.15-2
Total Download Size: 23.46 MB
Total Installed Size: 76.40 MB

Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs

Hi!
We are doing settlement for process orders, most of the process orders are created and goods receipts happened before standard cost estimation is released.
So during varaince calculation (KKS2/KKS1) we are getting error message: Only remaining var. in version 0 - no target costs
as we cannot cancel the goods receipts for process orders, we are doing settlements with remaining variance only.
The variance will directly go to CO-PA, as we have activated the same.
the example of one process order:
Total goods receipt is : 44175.58     co-product 1
                                   3757.38     co-product 2
total receipt              47932.96
Materials Issued(GI)     20025.98
Activity Cost          11985.3
_Total Cost     _     32011.28
the variance is:            13764.86             co-product 1 ( as per settlement rule 95%)
                                  2156.82              co-product 2 ( as per settlement rule 5%)
                                  15921.68
Once we have done the settlement there are 4 accounting documents posted for variance:
1.     Cost of production a/c DR 3757.38
                    TO Variance A/C Cr 3757.38 ( value flowing to COPA)
2.     Cost of production a/c DR 44175.58
                    TO Variance A/C Cr 44175.58 ( value flowing to COPA)
3.     Cost of production a/c CR 1600.56
                   TO Variance A/C Dr 1600.56 ( value is not flowing to COPA)
4.     Cost of production a/c CR 30410.72
                    TO Variance A/C Dr 30410.72 ( value is not flowing to COPA)
So the net effect of variance account posting in FI is OK.
But where as in CO-PA, variance is different, because only first two values ( total goods receipt value as variance amount) as above are passing to COPA.
Now how can we rectify the variance values in CO-PA?
We are using PA transfer structure A1 with the following assignments:
10     Input price variance
20     Mat Input quantity variance
30     Mat Resource-usage variance
40     Remaining input variance
50     Mixed-price variance
60     Output price variance
70     Lot size-/fixed-cost variance
80     Remaining variance
90     Scrap
regs,
ramesh
Edited by: Ramesh Balivada on Jul 28, 2011 6:41 PM

Hi ramesh
You need to live with this as you cant reverse the GR
To check this henceforth, use badi Workorder_update and write abap code for the Method AT SAVE or AT RELEASE... Check if field MBEW-LPLPR is INITIAL
br, Ajay M

Version conflict while targeting a vi to RT engine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for