Version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6

hey all
am trying to install database 9i on readhat 5
installation is done but DBCA NETCA are giving error
/u01/oracle9/jre/1.1.8/bin/../lib/i686/green_threads/libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
Unable to initialize threads: cannot find class java/lang/Thread
Could not create Java VM
soo how can i solve that please???
i tryed the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL and didnt work also the patch compat-libcwait is installed and is installed and the patch 3006854 is also installed
what can i do????

i tryed the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL Is still your LD_ASSUME_KERNEL set?
Recommended Settings for Installing Oracle Products
O/S
RHEL5, OEL5, SLES10
LD_ASSUME_KERNEL setting
Should not be set
Additionally you can review: Oracle Metalink Document: What should the value of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL be set to for Linux?: Doc ID: Note:377217.1
Adith

Similar Messages

  • GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6

    I am attempting to install the patch 11I.ATG.PF.H Detla 7, got errors at the end with 7 reports not compiling successfully. I went to recompile one report and got the following error message
    Error Message:
    /finora/product/10222/8.0.6/bin/rwcon60: relocation error: /finora/product/10222/8.0.6/network/jre11/lib/i686/native_threads/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
    Some articles state that LD_ASSUME_KERNEL needs to be set which is untrue for Redhat Linux 5.5. In fact things break if this is set in RHEL5.5.
    Not sure why this is not working.....any one else have issues with this?

    I am attempting to install the patch 11I.ATG.PF.H Detla 7, got errors at the end with 7 reports not compiling successfully. I went to recompile one report and got the following error message
    Error Message:
    /finora/product/10222/8.0.6/bin/rwcon60: relocation error: /finora/product/10222/8.0.6/network/jre11/lib/i686/native_threads/libjava.so: symbol __libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time referencePlease see these docs.
    ar60runb Relocation Error 'Version Glibc_2.0 Not Defined In File libc.so.6' When Running Concurrent Requests [ID 284535.1]
    Concurrent Requests Getting Error: ar60run: Relocation Error [ID 389698.1]
    Running Concurren Request Causes ar60run: relocation error libjava.so: symbol__libc_wait, version GLIBC_2.0 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference [ID 404500.1]
    Concurrent Requests Produce Zero Byte Output Files [ID 415196.1]
    Standard Concurrent Requests Fail After Fresh Install or Clone on Linux [ID 264951.1]
    rwcon60 Fails With 'Symbol __libc_wait, Version Glibc_2.0 Not Defined' Error Generating Reports [ID 371344.1]
    Concurrent Manager Jobs Fail After Reinstallation of the Operating System [ID 464960.1]
    > Some articles state that LD_ASSUME_KERNEL needs to be set which is untrue for Redhat Linux 5.5. In fact things break if this is set in RHEL5.5.
    Not sure why this is not working.....any one else have issues with this?Do not set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL on OEL5/RHEL5 -- What should the value of LD_ASSUME_KERNEL be set to for Linux? [ID 377217.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Number of iterations is not defined in file

    My environment HP Performance Center
    PC Standalone Edition 11.52.341Internal Components BuildOTA Client 11.52.341.0
    User Interface 11.52.341.0
    WebGate Client 11.52.341.0
    Test Run Scheduler 11.52.341.0
    Site Administration Client Not Available
    Sprinter 11.50.341
    Analysis Extension 11.50.341
    Quality Center 11.50.341
    ALM Lab Extension for functional and performance testing11.50.983  Issue I got two errors at the beginning of test:Error (-81015): LR_VUG: Number of iterations is not defined in file 'C:\Program Files (x86)\HP\Performance Center Host\Temp\lr5tmpdireFn.620\lrcfgYAR.621\cfgAKT.626'Error: The user files were not transferred to the local load generator In the PC11.52 Release Notes says that it is known Defect ID: QCCR1J25640 and it was fixed.  Why I still get these errors?

    Hello Henry,
    If it is a One Client Scenario the BBPGETVD transaction will not work. You will require to use MDS_LOAD_COCKPIT for vendor replication for the same.
    Regards,
    Sapna

  • In archiving job getting error: F5210 period version is not defined

    Hi All,
    When trying to execute T-code SARA using object FI_documnt, I encounter an error message :F5210 period version is not defined. Checked tables T070(document type life), table T071 (account type life) and found that they are properly maintained.
    What should I do next? Please advice.
    Regards
    kapil Kukreja

    Hi Kapil,
    I could not sure what input parameters you have entered. You are recommended to not enter a company code, because if yes, the archiving program has to determine the current fiscal year for all company codes defined in your customizing. This is necessary, as the summary records can not
    be archived for the current and the last year.
    Please review note SAP note 141322.
    Regards, Gordon

  • Version  0 not defined for fiscal year...

    Dear Experts..
    Im trying to do an hiring action but system says Version  0 not defined for fiscal year...
    Could someone tell me wat could be the reason???
    Regards
    Shanthini

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO: Controlling -  General controlling - Org - Maintain versions
    On the right hand side select version 0 then select controlling area settings.
    Again select version 0 on the right hand side and select Settings for each fiscal year.
    Then maintain the settings for the relevant fiscal year.
    Regards,
    Dilek

  • VERSION 0 NOT DEFINED

    Dear friends
    VERSION 0 NOT DEFINED ERROR
    I am working on CC 4000. When I save sales order, system give 0 version not defined problem.
    I did: 
    SPRP-IMG-Controlling-Organization-Maintain version-select 0 Version and click on Setting for Fiscal year then entered the Controlling Area.
    Message display – Controlling Area 300 does not exist. But I checked in IMG in FI it is there.
    Then I did: 
    SPRP-IMG-Controlling-Organization-Maintain Controlling Area.
    Copy 2200 Controlling Area to 3000. Then repeated the same steps.
    SPRP-IMG-Controlling-Organization-Maintain version-select 0 Version and click on Setting for Fiscal year then entered the Controlling Area.
    Marked the check box in 20007-Integrated Planning and Copy Allowed box then save.
    After when I save sales order system still display the same error “version 0 is not defined”
    But when I changed the system date to October 2002 there is no version 0 error.
    Can any one give me solution where I am doing mistake or what the exact problem is 
    Thanks
    Raj

    Hi,
    Go to SPRO-IMG-Controlling-General Controlling-Organisation-Maintain Versions
    Select  0
    Go To Setting for each Fiscal year on the left side ,
    Put your Controlling Area and Version 0 and click Tick
    Then select year 2007 and tick copying allowed and save.
    Regards
    Adarsh

  • Executable version does not match resource file

    Hi everybody
    I have built and application and installer, using LabVIEW 7.1
    The application runs correctly, but when I install it on the PC (the same that correctly runs the application). The following message is shown: "executable version(7.1.1) doesn't match resource file (7.1). Check your configuration". How can I change this configuration and solve the problem??
    Thanks in advance

    I haven't found the way to "change configuration", but I have managed to get it work. I will explain it, because perhaps somebody needs it sometime...
    The other day I installed LabVIEW RTE 7.1.1, and I have included when building the installer the LabVIEW RTE (in settings). This way, the application shows the error I mentioned previously.
    Now, I have rebuilt the application and installer without including the LabVIEW RTE and everything works OK.

  • Reader version 9 not opening some files: error "insufficient data for an image"

    Adobe reader version 9 is having difficulties opening PDF's, mainly with PDF's that contain charts or jpg's.
    When using Google Chrome browser, I get the message "insufficient data for an image."
    I am using windows XP.  When I open these same PDF's using Internet Explorer, they display fine, but some of them don't print, and cause the printing spooler to malfunction, i.e., the print spooler begins turning itself off repeatedly, and then I can't print anything from any program. This print spooler problem is really difficult to solve. But I think all of this is originating from some inability of the current version of Adobe to handle some PDF's, which is a recent phenomenon. I've never had problems like this before with previous versions.

    I've had the same problem then it got "magically" fixed by itself. A big thanks to Adobe for their updates

  • "GLIBC_2.3.3 not defined" problem when10g express installation in Red Hat9

    I downloaded "oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0.i386.rpm" from Oracle website, and then
    updated the Red Hat 9 with " libaio-0.3.96-3.src.rpm" patch. Now, the RH9 linux looks as below:
    ==========================
    $ rpm -q glibc
    glibc-2.3.2-11.9
    $ rpm -q libaio
    libaio-0.3.96-3
    ==========================
    After that, I installed Oracle 10.2.0 express on the RH9 linux with below commands:
    ===========================================
    $ rpm -ivh downloads/oracle-xe-univ-10.2.0.1-1.0.i386.rpm
    $ /etc/init.d/oracle-xe configure
    ============================================
    When I tried to start SQLPLUS, but I encounter the error described as the title:
    ==========================================================
    relocation error: /usr/lib/oracle/xe/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/server/bin/../lib/libclntsh.so.10.1: symbol semtimedop, version GLIBC_2.3.3 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference
    ==========================================================
    I just checked the forum, and found many people have asked the same problem. Have we got one solution to the problem?
    At the same time, I found Red Hat 9 does NOT occur in the document "Oracle Express Installation Guide 10g Release 2 (10.2) for Linux" (http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/database/xe/files/install.102/b25144/toc.htm)
    My question is whether Oracle Express 10.2 can NOT be installed on RH9 or not? Does any expert give us one clear answer? If not, we shall not try it on RH9, and we can install it on Fedora Core4 or SESE SLES-9
    Message was edited by:
    user545243

    My question is whether Oracle Express 10.2 can NOT be
    installed on RH9 or not? Does any expert give us one
    clear answer? If not, we shall not try it on RH9, and
    we can install it on Fedora Core4 or SESE SLES-9Oracle CAN be installed on RH9.
    However, if you try to mount a modern engine in an ancient Model-T ford car, you must be prepared to make some adjustments.
    Same here ... RH9 was released several years before Oracle Database 10.2 and many, many things have been changed in Linux. Oracle assumes that the Linux you are using has a specific set of libraries (glibc being the most important) available at a specific version - they were not available with the same API in RH9 days so you would need to make those libraries available yourself without interfering with other operations of RH9.
    The same holds true for other combinations of Linux distro and Oracle database distro. However, some very sharp people have installed using some of those combinations and have published those installation cookbooks - Werner Puschitz at http://www.puschitz.com and Ivan Kartik at http://ivan.kartik.sk/ are the most notable.
    I'd highly recommend you consider getting a newer version, and possibly staying very close to a version that Oracle used, to keep the opportunities for troubleshooting to a minimum.

  • /libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0

    Hi ,
    I am trying to run the postclone of 11.5.8 on apps node on oracle enterprise linux 5.2 but throws below mentioned error
    /libzip.so: symbol errno, version GLIBC_2.0
    not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference (libzip.so)
    Thanks&Regards,
    Apps DBA

    Hi ,
    Now we are not able to connect to database from application,below is the error from clone log file.
    AutoConfig Setup Phase
    Running Setup Process 1 of 4 for AD_TOP
    Executing script in InstantiateFile:
    /applbfkd/bfkdcomn/admin/install/BFKD_bfkskrue02/admkxdir.sh APPS apps
    script returned:
    .end std out.
    AutoConfig Setup Phase
    Running Setup Process 2 of 4 for AD_TOP
    Executing script in InstantiateFile:
    /applbfkd/bfkdcomn/admin/install/BFKD_bfkskrue02/adsupmult.sh APPS apps
    script returned:
    adsupmult.sh is obsolete. Use CVM (Context Value Management) instead.
    .end std out.
    AutoConfig Setup Phase
    Running Setup Process 3 of 4 for AD_TOP
    Executing script in InstantiateFile:
    /applbfkd/bfkdcomn/admin/install/BFKD_bfkskrue02/adgentopfile.sh APPS apps
    script returned:
    Context file does not exist: /admin/BFKD_bfkskrue02.xml
    ERRORCODE = 1 ERRORCODE_END
    .end std out.
    AutoConfig Setup Phase
    Running Setup Process 4 of 4 for AD_TOP
    Executing script in InstantiateFile:
    /applbfkd/bfkdcomn/admin/install/BFKD_bfkskrue02/afcpnode.sh APPS apps
    script returned:
    afcpnode.sh started at ons des 31 11:37:51 CET 2008
    Parameters passed are : APPS apps
    The environment settings are as follows ...
    ORACLE_HOME : /applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6
    ORACLE_SID :
    TWO_TASK : BFKD
    PATH : /applbfkd/bfkdora/iAS/Apache/perl/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdappl/fnd/11.5.0/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdappl/ad/11.5.0/bin::/applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdcomn/util/jre/1.1.8/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/ccs/bin:/usr/sbin:/applbfkd/bfkdcomn/util/jre/1.1.8/bin:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/applbusk/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdcomn/clone/bin:/applbfkd/bfkdcomn/clone/bin
    LD_LIBRARY_PATH : /applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/network/jre11/lib/i686/native_threads:/applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/network/jre11/lib/linux/native_threads:/applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/lib:/applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/thrlib:/usr/dt/lib:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/openwin/lib
    SQLPLUS Executable : /applbfkd/bfkdora/8.0.6/bin/sqlplus
    SQL*Plus: Release 8.0.6.0.0 - Production on Wed Dec 31 11:37:51 2008
    (c) Copyright 1999 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    ERROR:
    ORA-12203: TNS:unable to connect to destination
    afcpnode.sh exiting with status 1
    Thanks&Regards,
    Apps DBA

  • Facebook games keep giving draggable not defined error

    hi i keep getting draggable not defined when trying to click tab ( link ) pages on facebook games. both firexox and java are latest versions, this is a fresh install of vista 64 and i have tried it on my windows 7 also 64 bit. sorry im not java minded at all.
    Error: Draggable is not defined
    Source File: http://cdn1.kingdomsofcamelot.com/fb/e2/src/js/camelotmain.js?112233449900886
    Line: 1
    after evaluation i get
    Error: missing ; before statement
    Source File: javascript:%20Error:%20Draggable%20is%20not%20defined%20Source%20File:%20http://cdn1.kingdomsofcamelot.com/fb/e2/src/js/camelotmain.js?112233449900886%20Line:%201
    Line: 1, Column: 8
    Source Code:
    Error: Draggable is not defined Source File: http://cdn1.kingdomsofcamelot.com/fb/e2/src/js/camelotmain.js?112233449900886 Line: 1

    Hi Chief Mendenhall,
    It's really a Microsoft error, not a Acrobat error, but I know that doesn't make the inability to sign any less frustrating.  This probably has something to do with the communication bridge between Acrobat, Windows, and the CAC software. I know you're not responsible for software upgrades, but is there any chance you can download the free Adobe Reader (Adobe Reader Install for all versions). Even though Reader doesn't have the same editing capability as Acrobat Pro, it will allow you to sign a PDF file, and what I'm looking to see is if this is somehow related to the age of version 8.1, which is well past its end-of life. Even version 9 in longer supported.
    Thanks,
    Steve

  • GLIBCXX_3.4 not defined [solved]

    I'm trying to compile a C++ program (for school), but I'm getting an error.
    Error:
    ./mymain: relocation error: ./mymain: symbol _ZNKSt9basic_iosIcSt11char_traitsIcEEcvPvEv, version GLIBCXX_3.4 not defined in file libstdc++.so.6 with link time reference
    It was working a couple days ago.
    I tried recompiling libstdc++5, but it didn't help.
    I don't know much about this library, so some help would be nice.
    ~jnengland77
    Last edited by jnengland77 (2008-10-28 23:20:31)

    Well I'm just compiling use g++ -o mymain mymain.cpp  or make (e.g. make mymain ). 
    As far as changes I hadn't updated in a while so I updated I think last Friday.  I think there was like 400 MB in downloads.  I can't remember what was updated.  It must have been from that night though.  Since it worked that night, but I haven't compiled anything till now (been rebooted a couple times since then).
    I haven't rebooted my desktop for a while, and recently updated it, too.  But it's more frequently updated.  Till I get the laptop to compile stuff I'll be leaving the desktop running.
    ~jnengland77
    UPDATE:  I think I fixed the problem by reinstalling gcc and gcc-lib.  And maybe using more parameters for g++ such as -g -Wall  and-Os .  There after it fixes make, too.  I don't quite understand why that fixed it, unless it was the reinstall of gcc and gcc-libs that did it.
    Last edited by jnengland77 (2008-10-28 07:03:35)

  • Error: $x_ShowChildren is not defined

    The page definition page is not displaying any of the usual page objects. I'm getting an Error: $x_ShowChildren is not defined in the error console.
    Source File: http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=4000:4150:1692562586117686::NO:::
    Line: 39 error on the page definition page.

    Hi all, we are experiencing this "$x_ShowChildren is not defined" error on our new
    APEX 3.0 installation.
    I've already checked the notes at
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/html/3.0_fsps.html#01
    and our page really looks as depicted at point one but the refresh doesn't seem to
    do anything. We have tried to flush the cache and even change browser (IE and FF)
    but the problem is still there.
    I've checked the page source and the missing function is defined in
    /i/javascript/htmldb_html_elements.js
    The js file is visible if loaded directly but somehow the page fails with
    Error: $x_ShowChildren is not defined
    Source File: [...]/f?p=4000:4150:4106999370516652::::FB_FLOW_PAGE_ID,FB_FLOW_ID:1,101
    Line: 39
    (I've removed our address there ...)
    The strange thing is that this happens only from certain PCs but all the
    configurations (browser, network, ...) seem to be identical.
    Any idea of what might be going on?
    Thanks in advance for your kind help

  • Just Upgraded to 3.1.2 - doSubmit is not defined.

    I just upgraded to the latest XE by running the download.
    I am getting this error on the browser when I try to login :
    Error: doSubmit is not defined
    Source File: http://127.0.0.1:8080/apex/f?p=4550:1:1915389911065507
    Line: 1
    Any suggestions?
    -SJ

    Hello,
    Did you follow all the post installation steps? (Updating the Javascript/CSS files etc?). If so, try clearing out your browser cache to make sure your browser is getting the latest files.
    Hope this helps,
    John.
    Blog: http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net
    Work: http://www.apex-evangelists.com
    Author of Pro Application Express: http://tinyurl.com/3gu7cd
    REWARDS: Please remember to mark helpful or correct posts on the forum, not just for my answers but for everyone!

  • [solved] libc.so.6 version GLIBC_2.16 not found

    i have tried to upgrade arch today, and i am getting too deep,
    im stilll getting error message
    pacman: /lib/libc.so.6 version GLIBC_2.16 not found (required by /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4)
    i followed the instructions here https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/De … iki:usrlib and am not getting anywhere. i am following the instructions here https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1144268 and im also not getting anywhere with this. 
    i did untar the package curl-7.26.0-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz from cache and tried to overwrite teh curl libs in /usr/lib and im still getting this error.  previously i ignored the unresolvable dependencies which i now feel is a mistake, the list is quite long, heres an example
    warning: ignoring package glibc-2.16.0-2
    warning: cannot resolve "glibc>=2.16", a dependency of "gcc-libs"
    :: The following packages cannot be upgraded due to unresolvable dependencies:
    binutils gcc gcc-libs
    Do you want to skip the above packages for this upgrade [y/N]
    and the actual ones i ignored that i still have to upgrade because they have been ignored are as follows
    pacman -Sd binutils dbus dbus-core gcc gcc-libs ghostscript glib2 glibmm gnutls grep gtk2 icu initscripts libcups libgl linux mesa mkinitcpio pcre php php-apache php-gd php-mcrypt php-pear phpmyadmin samba systemd-tools
    im going to stop here until i get some assistance if possible before i break anything.  i do have my original curl libs backed up to /tmp/pacman_build/usr directory
    where to go from here?
    Last edited by wolfdogg (2012-08-12 06:45:49)

    okay so here's the output of the command:
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib'
    /lib/libnss_files-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_db.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libresolv.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libutil.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libc.so.6 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_nis-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libmemusage.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libBrokenLocale-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/ld-linux.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_hesiod-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libSegFault.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libcrypt-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_nisplus.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnsl-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libpthread-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libm-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libdl.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/ld-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libcidn-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_files.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_nis.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libresolv-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/librt.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_compat-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libpcprofile.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libcidn.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_hesiod.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_db-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libdl-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libthread_db.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libpthread.so.0 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_nisplus-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libm.so.6 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libthread_db-1.0.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_dns-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/librt-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libutil-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libBrokenLocale.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libc-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libcrypt.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libanl.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib/modules'
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH'
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.ccwmap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.ofmap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.ieee1394map
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.pcimap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.inputmap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.usbmap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.seriomap
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/3.1.9-2-ARCH/modules.isapnpmap
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH'
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel'
    error: cannot determine ownership of directory '/lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss'
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_hdaudio.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_via97.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_cmpci.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_ali5455.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_envy24.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_imux.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_audiopci.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_midimix.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_ich.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_madi.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_solo.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_digi96.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_emu10k1x.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_midiloop.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/osscore.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_cs4281.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_envy24ht.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_cs461x.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_audioloop.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_via823x.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_trident.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_sbpci.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_geode.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_cmi878x.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_atiaudio.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_fmedia.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_sbxfi.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_ymf7xx.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_usb.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_audigyls.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_sblive.ko
    error: No package owns /lib/modules/extramodules-3.2-ARCH/kernel/oss/oss_userdev.ko
    /lib/libanl-2.15.so is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_compat.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnsl.so.1 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    /lib/libnss_dns.so.2 is owned by glibc 2.15-12
    if you say "have a look in /lib yourself if there are any leftover files or directories" then what files exactly do you mean? those who are still owned by glibc? and how do I move them properly (or is this already described in the wiki)?

Maybe you are looking for