Versions of RFX in srm 7

HI Gurus,
We are in SRM 7, when I am trying to publish a bid the version of the bid changes to 2 insted of 1, If again the bid is republish the version changes to 3 but in tracking it show version 1 as a historical doc.
Is it standard behavior??or should I raise it to SAP ?
As per my understanding first change should be caught as version 1 and then it should change to 2 then 3 ....
Can any one please make me understand the versioning in RFx.
Thanks & Regards
        NITIN

Dear Jay,
Thanks for your clarification,
Will you please clarify the system behaviour for the Response version also ?? As I am seeing the version 2 as the active version for the first response and parallely historical version  1 , in the bbp_pd,
But  on the portal, Response version is still 1. which version I have to take in to account for our further development ??
Thanks in advance
NITIN
Edited by: nitinkk on Nov 10, 2011 7:38 AM

Similar Messages

  • Error creating RFx in SRM 7.0

    Hi all,
    When creating a new RFx in SRM, I am getting the following error message:
    "No status object is available for "
    This occurs when I try to add a bidder, which is also not added to the list.
    Does anyone knows why this may occur?
    Thanks in advance.
    Best regards,
    Joã

    This issues is solved.
    It was necessary to add an entry in customizing for "Assign User-Specified Status Profiles to Purchasing Documents":
    SPRO -> SRM Server -> Cross-Industry Functions -> Application Settings -> User-Specified Status -> Assign User-Specified Status Profiles to Purchasing Documents

  • Applet version does not match SRM server version error in SRM

    Hi Expert,
    I get error as "Applet version does not match SRM server version" when trying to trigger the auction cockpit by clicking the button 'Live Auction'.
    sap details:
    OS : AIX
    DB : Oracle 11.2
    SAP_Basis : 740 patch 9
    SRM server : 713 patch 7
    I installed JRE 6. (1.6.0.45) in my local system also later installed JRE 8 (latest version) but still issue not resolved.
    I try to implement below note which is showing message "Can not be Implemented" in snote transaction
    "1846990 Applet version does not match abap server version SRM 703"
    We are using ABAP LAC
    Kindly advice to resolve issue
    Regards,
    Dev

    Hi,
    Issue resolved after implementing Note no. 2113801
    Regards,
    Dev

  • Question on SUS version on SRM 5.0

    Hi all,
    What is the version of SUS on SRM 5.0? What are the business packages that come with that version of SUS?
    Regards,
    Ashwini.

    Hi,
    Please look at business package for supplier collaboration :
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/webcontent/uuid/209c9c49-b76d-2910-d1bc-fa4aa399dde3 [original link is broken]
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • RFx Header Target Value in Sourcing  is Zero for RFx created in SRM Manually

    Hi All,
      We are facing the issue with RFx Header Target Value, before proceeding with question , like to share our scenario's
    We are using SAP SRM Classical Strategic Scenario.  and below are two possible ways.
      Case1)ECC PR - SRM SC (EXTR-BUS2121) - SRM RFx(BUS2200) - SRM RFx Response(BUS2202) - > ECC PO.
      Case2)ECC PR - SRM SC (EXTR-BUS2121) - SRM RFx(BUS2200) - SRM RFx Response(BUS2202) - > SRM Contract - ECC Contract.
      Case3) SRM RFx(user create RFx directly in SRM ) - SRM RFx(BUS2200) - SRM RFx Response(BUS2202) - > SRM Contract - ECC Contract.
      Case4)SRM RFx(user create RFx directly in SRM ) - SRM RFx(BUS2200) - SRM RFx Response(BUS2202) - > - > ECC PO.
       Now for cases  1 & 2 ,  Target Value in the RFx Header is populating correctly ,but  for Cases 3 & 4 where the RFx is directly created in SRM  ,the Target Value field is visible and editable in the RFx Header ,but when we enter some value and go to other tab, like bidder, the "Target Value" is getting cleared.,
      Can any help to understand this  SAP behavior of application ,Is this SAP standard? or is there is any miss in our configuration.? Kindly provide some inputs on this. I also cross checked the notes
    Thanks
    Channa

    Hello Channa,
    There is note 1992525 and 1712226.
    Please refer to the note 2037465 for important information about pricing.
    This note has all information about pricing in SRM for different scenarios.
    Best regards,
    Rohit

  • Things to look for in SRM 7.0 upgrade.

    Hello Everyone,
    We are using SRM 5.0 with Extended classic scenario and we need to upgrade from SRM 5.0 to SRM 7.0.
    We are going to send RFP to different vendors for this upgrade project.
    As a project manager what I should ask from different vendors before the upgrade?
    What things I should look for from vendors before the SRM 7.0 upgrade or what questions I should ask to different vendors before the SRM 7.0 upgrade?
    Regards,
    Khushbu.

    Hi Khushbu ,
    This are the sample basic question for SRM upgrade .
    SAP SRM Upgrade Questionnaire
    Basic Information
        Company / Project Name
        Current Backend SAP R/3 or ECC Version / Plug-In Version
            - OLTP Backend System 1
            - OLTP Backend System 2
            - OLTP Backend System 3
            - OLTP Backend System n
        Current SRM Release / Plug-In Version
    Components in SAP SRM
    Please list which of the following Components are currently implemented (Y/N) and their release versions :
    a) EBP
    b) SUS
    c) Live Auction
    d) Requisite Catalog
    e) CCM
    f) MDM Catalog
    f) IPC
    b) XI
    h) Enterprise Portal
    i) BW (SRM Analytics)
    j) ITS
    k) CRM Middleware
    l) HR Integration
    m) Others
    If the answer to any of the above is No, Are you considering implementing additional SRM components?  If so, please list the components
    Do you have any of the following scenarios :
    a) 1 EBP client connected to Multiple backend SAP R/3 clients
    b) Multiple EBP Clients connected to Multiple backend SAP R/3 systems
    SRM Scenarios currently used
    Self Service Procurement
    Service Procurement
    Plan Driven Procurement
    Contract Management
    Supplier Self Services
    Strategic Sourcing - RFx, Live Auction
    Other SAP Solutions
       Please List R/3 or ECC  Modules Currently In Use
    Have you implemented SAP Supply Chain Management (APO)?
    If yes, what is your current APO Version
    Have you implemented Product Lifecycle Management (PLM)?
    If yes, what is your current PLM Version
       Please name any other SAP Add-ons or Industry Solutions in use
    Basis Information
        Database release for current backend SAP R/3 or ECC system
        Operating System release for current backend SAP R/3 or ECC System
        What is your Hardware Platforms for current backend SAP R/3 or ECC system (e.g.HP, IBM, etc.)?
    How many systems are in your landscape for current backend SAP R/3 or ECC system (e.g., Development, Quality Assurance, Production, etc.)?
         How large is your current Production Database in backend SAP R/3 or ECC system (in GB)?
    Current SRM Database Size?
       Database release for Current SRM system?
       What is your SRM Hardware Platforms (e.g., HP, IBM, etc.)?
    What is your current OS for the different components of SRM which are in use
    Please explain the complete system Landscape for SRM (Use a separate sheet, if required)
    SRM Data Conversion or Replication (if any)
       Business Partners
        How many vendor records are handled in SRM ?
    Product Masters
        How many product master records are there in SAP R/3 ?
        How many product master records are available in SRM ?
    Legacy Systems and their Migration
    Any new data migration from legacy systems
    System Enhancements
    Custom Developments
        Complex
        Medium
        Minor
    Custom Tables
    Custom Java codes (e.g in IPC)
    Badi's / User Exits
    Screen modifications
    z-transactions
    Non-SAP External Systems and Integration issues
       Have you integrated any Non-SAP External systems to SRM ? 
       List of Interfaces :
       1) EBP-Business Connector-WOI (IBM Web Order Interface)
       2)
       3)
    Is SRM integrated to a Third Party Tax Engine e.g Vertex, Taxware
         Are you using email servers integrated with SRM ?  If yes, which email system (e.g., Lotus Notes, Outlook, etc.)?
    XI (Exchange Infrastructure)
    List of Interfaces
    1) P.O create
    2) P.O Change
    3) Order Acknowledgement
    4)
    5)
    Project Management Tools used in Project
    Are you using Solution Manager ?
    Other Tools used
    Size of  Current SAP Team and Availability of SAP Resources
          What is the size of the existing SAP SRM support team : Any Consulting / AMS Team
          What is the size of the existing SAP SRM support team : Internal Team / COE
    Training Requirements
        Please Explain the User training methods used in Previous ERP or SRM implementations.
        How many Super Users, and End Users got trained during SRM 3.0 implementation?
       Do you have additional training Requirements?  If so, please describe.
       What testing tools are used currently ?
    Project Constraints
    What are the budgetary constraints for this project?
    What are the  resource constraints for this project?
    What are the timeline (duration) constraints for this project?
    Additional Comments
    Is there any plan to upgrade any of the OLTP R/3 systems in the near future
    UNICODE
    Are your current OLTP R/3 systems Unicode complaint
    Is your current SRM system Unicode Compliant
    What languages are used in the current R/3 systems
    What additional languages are required in the R/3 systems
    What languages are used in the current EBP system (Core)
    What additional languages are required in the EBP system (Core)
    What are the languages supported in the HTML layer currently
    What additional languages are required in the HTML layer
    Hope this will be useful to you .
    Thanks & Regards
    Pradeep Kumar Dondeti

  • Technical Help on creation of an Object in SAP SRM 4.0

    Being on SAP SRM 4.0, we currently have a requirement for creation of Need Definition( Basically a build up for the contract ). Need being collected from the Backend systems need to be validated and approved by Buyers & Lead Buyers in the SRM system.
    Technically, this task is broken down to below tasks.
    1) Creation of need definition screen - Basically a template where a need can be created with Items, Sub Items and other related information
    2) Selection Screen for Buyers and Lead Buyers - This enables the the Buyers to select the Need Definition assigned to them based on the status. 
    3) Report - List of all the Need Definition( Item and Sub Item)satisfying the selection of step 2. with the possibility to navigate to the Need Definition screen ( Step 1) upon selection.
    Now the question is,
    what technology is recommended for the above Tasks? We thought it would be BSP but do you guys have any suggestions...
    Do we have any issues in displaying the report in BSP? please let me know
    Remember we are version 4.0 of SRM.
    Thanks in Advance..
    Mohan.

    Even though I don't have much knowledge on BSP, it should be a good option. Since SAP has used BSP to develop new screens in SRM 5.0.
    Regards, IA

  • Can two different SRM clients systems connect to one R/3 Back-end system?

    Hello,
    Trying to developing SRM Co-Exist/Global strategy, based on the following scenario:
    1.  Two different SRM client systems, each at DIFFERENT SRM Version/Release Level.  SRM system "A" runs in Stand-Alone and Extend Classic Scenario mode.  SRM system "B" runs in Classic Scenario mode
    2.  Two different R/3 back-end systems, each with SAME R/3 4.7 Version/Release Level.
    Question 1:  Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
    Question 2:  Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
    Question 3:  Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
    Question 4:  Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
    Please advise and thanks in advance for your feedback!
    Regards,
    Ed
    Edited by: Ed Shigo on Mar 16, 2009 6:40 AM

    Question 1: Can the two (2) different SRM client systems be connected to one (1) of the R/3 back-end systems?
    They can be connected
    Question 2: Are there any Basis Plug-In (PI_BASIS) issues/difficulties to consider from either the SRM client or R/3 back-end side?
    Make sure that you have unique consumer entries for Middleware for Material replication, RFCs etc
    Question 3: Does each SRM client need it own unique transaction document type(s) and number range(s) definitions?
    Yes you need to have them.
    Question 4: Are there any other difficulties, for example, with RFC and Partner Profile related definitions and what are the steps to address/resolve difficulties?
    Don't see any difficulties as long as the a structured approach is followed.

  • Purchase Order version issue...

    Hi,
    We are facing one very picular issue.
    Whenver an PO is getting created with reference to the Shopping Cart or through carry out sourcing or a direct PO, system is generating the version as 2.
    Actually, once the SC is approve through various stages or when we are creating a PO using carry out sourcing or we are creating an puchase order directly then the version should always be zero.
    Can somebody help/guide me to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ~Abey

    Whenver an PO is getting created with reference to the Shopping Cart or through carry out sourcing or a direct PO, system is generating the version as 2.
    Not only PO, but all business document types that are configured to have versioning turned on have the same behavior as you described, which is standard. The reason is that when PO is first created and ordered, a historical version is generated as a copy of the active document. That historical document is given version 1. The current active document would then be 2 to begin with. There has never been a version zero concept in SRM standard.

  • Error while process the CPPR-Rfx "No receiver could be determined"

    Hi Experts,
    We are working on SRM 7.0 Extended Classic Scenario, While testing the CPPR-Rfx process we are getting the error msg in Portal
    "No receiver could be determined".
    We implemented Badi ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST & BBP_EBPXML_OUT_BADI
    We are getting this ERROR " No receiver could be determined" While clicking the "CREATE RFX" with reference to Purchase Requisition through Hormonized roles.
    Pl suggest what could be the problem.
    Regards,
    Mohan

    Check if below settinjgs are in place:
    Parameter CV_EXT_RFX_IND is set to true in ME_REQ_SOURCING_CUST  to create RFX.
    Business functions are activated in backend ECC system.
    In backend system Event type linkage is activated for receiver WS53800009, event RFXREQUESTED and BO BUS2105
    In Backend system Activate outbound messages for events RFCREQUESTED for object type BUS2105.
    RFC user used in PI system is assigned to Purch org in SRM org structure.
    Maintain the service call RFQRequestSUITERequest_In in XI/PI.
    Maintain transac type for RFx in SRM.
    Do you see any entries in XI monitor and queues?
    Thanks,
    Jagadish

  • Item info gets blanked while creating RFx response

    Hi,
    I am facing a strange issue while creating the RFx response (SRM 7.0).
    when I try to create a Bid, the item info (required quantity and Unit) gets blanked and this fields are blocked.
    Did any one faced any similar issue. Any possible solutions.
    Regards,
    Francisco Salvado

    Hi,
    This subject is widely discussed in SDN, you could have searched SDN before posting this thread.
    As you do not have info record, then tax code defaulted in the Purchase order by maintaining condition record only  with your material (may be with other criteria)which you said item number 10.More details on default tax code, check link:
    Default Tax code in P.O
    Also check link for SDN rules
    https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/RulesofEngagement
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Can we creat  the inforecord in ECC  as the follow on document  of the RFX

    Hi ,experts :
      As we know , we can create the contract as  the follow on document  of the RFX in SRM  .But ,in my case ,the client do not want to use the contract  .The use the inforecord  in ECC .
      So ,I want to know how to create the inforecord  as the follow on document  of  RFx ?
    Any suggestions ,welcome .
    Bestregards !
    Alex !

    Hi,Masa:
        Thanks for your reply .
       I checked the function modle .In  this FM  , the system has one Remote Fuction Call ---'BBPV_CONTRACT_CREATE'(this function is on the backend system ).So ,I should change this FM  use the new one ,right ?
      I am sorry ,do you know the funtion name  that can create the inforecord  in Ecc?
      many thanks !
    Bestregards !
    Alex !

  • Change Mail content for standard mail 'Simultaneous logon approval required' in 2 Envelop RFx

    Hi Experts,
    Please suggest, we have a requirement where we need to Change Mail content for standard mail 'Simultaneous logon approval required' and Simultaneous Logon Successful in 2 Envelop RFx in SRM.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

    Hi Gaurav,
    please implement BADI /SAPPSSRM/BD_SIM_LOGIN
    Enhance Simultaneous Logon
    Use
    You can use this Business Add-In (BAdI) to incorporate customer-specific functions into the initiation and completion processes for simultaneous logon and to adapt simultaneous logon e-mail notifications.
    Method PROCESS_FINISH
    You use this method to add customer-specific functions to the simultaneous logon process. This method is called on completion of the simultaneous logon process.
    The following parameters are provided
    IV_EXT_GUID
    Process ID of the external process
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (completion)
    CV_SUCCESS
    Indicates whether the process was successful
    IV_SET_GUID
    Process ID of the customer-specific process
      Method PROCESS_INIT 
    You use this method to add customer-specific functions to the simultaneous logon process. This method is called on initiation of the simultaneous logon process.
    The following parameters are provided:
    IV_EXT_GUID
    Process ID of the external process
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (initiation)
    IV_SET_GUID
    Process ID of the customer-specific process
      Method SIM_EXT_MAIL 
    You use this method to change the content of the e-mail sent to participants on successful initiation, completion or failure of the simultaneous logon session and to define the external process that is calling the simultaneous logon application.
    The following parameters are provided:
    IV_OBJECT_ID
    Business object identifier
    IV_MODE
    Indicates the mode of the e-mail function (initiation, completion or failure)
    IV_EXT_MODE
    Indicates the external process, for example, technical RFx response opening, of the calling application. This could be any process for which you want to use simultaneous logon.
    CT_MAIL_BODY
    Content of the e-mail
    CV_MAIL_SUB
    Subject line of the e-mail
    Standard settings
    If the customer does not define a BAdI implementation, SAP delivers a default BAdI implementation. The default implementation incorporates the simultaneous logon process with the two-envelope RFx response process. You cannot use the simultaneous logon process with standard RFxs in the default implementation.
    Activities
    Information about the implementation of BAdIs in the context of the enhancement concept is available in the SAP Library for SAP NetWeaver under BAdIs - Embedding in the Enhancement Framework.
    Regards,
    raghuveer

  • SRM 7.0 EHP1 integartion with ECC

    HI,
    We are currently using EHP4 of ECC and upgraded our SRM system from 5.0 to EHP1.
    What is the min version reqt for integration SRM 7.0 EHP1 with ECC??
    I read somehere that SRM 7.0 EHP1 cannot be integarted with ECC lower than EHP5?can someone confirm?

    Hi Ricardo,
    Thanks for the response!
    It is recommended to have SRM 7.01 with ECC EHP4 (at least) to get the maximum advantage of integration part of SRM and ECC system. With these combination, you can create central contract via ESOA services and distribute the contract to R/3 backend system.
    -->By SRM 7.0 .1 do you mean SRM 7.0 EHP1?
    Can you also confirm if all features of ECC EHP4 are part of EHP5?(EHP4 is subset of EHP5)
    We are currently on  SRM 7.0 and are planning to upgrade to EHP1.However on the ECC side,we have all business functions needed in both EHP4 and EHP5.Considering this,would it be advisable to anyways upgrade SRM to EHP1?
    Also by upgrading to EHP1,my undesratanding is that we only activate the scenario specific switches in the system..is that true?
    Please advise.

  • Contract Replication SRM 7.0 for ECC 6.0

    I am in the version 7.0 of SRM and I need to send the contract PCTR of SRM for ECC 6.0. 
    - Connections SM59 is well; 
    - Attribute CT_PROC_TY of the structure is well; 
    - Transaction Types and Number Screech is well; 
    - IDOCs BLAORD y defined COND_A in WE20 is well; 
    Did I forget something? 
    All creates the contract and I try to distribute the same, the mistake below it is exhibited: 
    " Could not determines back-end system goes contract " 
    Determination of Back End is well. 
    Some idea?
    Rgs,
    Pedro

    Hi, Pedro:
    It is SRM Extended Classic mode?
    You want to transfer the contract to ECC？
    Please check the ECC and SRM both sides of the scope of the contract number.
    Sarah

Maybe you are looking for