Very bad performance

I have mabook pro mid 2012. Memory 8 GB, SSD 256 GB. After update to yosemite, my performance is very bad.
this screens of usage cpu
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s301/sh/ec3e4aaf-8c39-4971-bd4d-6343e040516c/cfe5 2044dd723500517a1b0630bc07cc/deep/0/Мониторинг-системы-(Все-процессы)-и-Start-Ne w-Discussion---Apple-Support-Communities.png
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gnsf9jqao0qeknz/%D0%A1%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%BA%2 0%D1%8D%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%202014-10-18%20%D0%B2%2022.33.10.png?dl=0
On the second screen idle 97%+. What is?

Some value...sorry but the editor it doesn't help..
Blocking Session Id 0
Wait Type null
Wait Time 0
last_wait_type
SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD
open_transaction_count
open_resultset_count
2
1
transaction_id
context_info
percent_complete
estimated_completion_time
cpu_time
total_elapsed_time
2528356
0x
0
0
20866516
23232274
reads
writes
logical_reads
text_size
331686   
1175137
346450263
 2147483647
transaction_isolation_level
lock_timeout
deadlock_priority
row_count
prev_error
nest_level
granted_query_memory
executing_managed_code
2
-1
0
0
0
0
761341
0

Similar Messages

  • Very Bad performance with high stress on Tempdb

    Hello ,
    below is the execution plan for a query rapidly increase the Tempdb and has very slow performance,
    appreciate your suggestion to enhance this query (any data is available upon request) 

    >Covering indexes will make a huge difference.
    You can't simply "create-covering-index" yourself out from every performance jam.
    Questions:
    Is the query important enough to justify special consideration?
    How many covering indexes?
    What is the performance impact of the new covering indexes on other queries?
    Query optimization:
    http://www.sqlusa.com/articles/query-optimization/
    Kalman Toth Database & OLAP Architect
    SELECT Video Tutorials 4 Hours
    New Book / Kindle: Exam 70-461 Bootcamp: Querying Microsoft SQL Server 2012

  • Very bad performance of NWBC in IE11

    Hello colleagues!
    I've faced with a bad performance of NWBC in IE11 after update to NW7.02 SP16 GRC10 SP18. According to the pam IE 11 is supported.
    When I log in and try to create an access request I get a picture with slow circle
    (the message at the bottom of the window indicates that I've switched off all security settings and plug-ins)
    After 1-1,5 minute I get a normal screen
    If I try select an entry from any drop list or perform any other actions the window hangs with information (Not responding)
    Has anyone experienced the same problem in GRC or similar products?
    My search results for this issue were not successful.
    I suspect that the problem is in NWBC, because webgui works fine, and hope that someone can provide with the corrections.
    I've tried to use httpwatch, but it hasn't shown any useful information. I only identified that big time consumption happens when load one page (see below)
    Could any one advice how to resolve the issue ?
    System parameters:
    SAP_BASIS    702    0016    SAPKB70216    SAP - базисная система
    SAP_ABA    702    0016    SAPKA70216    Компоненты, общие для всех приложений
    PI_BASIS    702    0016    SAPK-70216INPIBASIS    Basis Plug-In
    ST-PI    2008_1_700    0011    SAPKITLRDK    SAP Solution Tools Plug-In
    SAP_BW    702    0016    SAPKW70216    SAP Business Warehouse
    GRCFND_A    V1000    0018    SAPK-V1018INGRCFNDA    GRC Foundation ABAP
    ST-A/PI    01Q_700    0002    SAPKITAB7L    Servicetools for other App./Netweaver 04
    Regards,
    Artem
    P.S. notes that I have checked:
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1717650
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1674530
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1937379
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1926394
    http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/2016738

    Hello Samuli!
    I've implemented all corrections up to Corrections for unified rendering 702/17 VII.
    Program WDG_MAINTAIN_UR_MIMES shows the following output:
    Status
    ZIP Archive Path in MIME Repository:     /sap/public/bc/ur/ur_mimes_nw7.zip
    ZIP File Prefix:                         mimes/
    ZIP Archive Timestamp:                   11.03.2015 16:37:21
    ZIP Archive LOIO:                        0019BBCA3D421DEDB6E50FEB0CAFEA8B
    ZIP Archive Size [Bytes]:                12.879.368
    Deployed ZIP Archive Timestamp:          11.03.2015 16:37:21
    Deployment Timestamp:                    11.03.2015 17:09:09
    Number of deployed files:                8.161
    Deployed version.properties:
      urversion:                             7.33.3.80.0
      urrelease:                             UnifiedR_03_REL
      urchangelist:                          222951
      urtimestamp:                           201410291102
      urimplementationversion:               03.000.20141028171614.0000
      urspnumber:                            00
      ursppatchlevel:                        0
      urtarget:                              NewYork
      codeline:                              $File: //tc1/uicore/UnifiedR_03_REL/src/_version/version/version.properties $
    CLUR_NW7=>VERSION_PROPERTIES:
      urversion:                             7.33.3.80.0
      urrelease:                             UnifiedR_03_REL
      urchangelist:                          222951
      jschangelist:                          223208
      urtimestamp:                           201410291102
      urimplementationversion:               03.000.20141028171614.0000
      urspnumber:                            00
      ursppatchlevel:                        0
      urtarget:                              NewYork
      codeline:                              $File: //tc1/uicore/UnifiedR_03_REL/src/_version/version/version.properties $
    Previously I had 7.33.3.68.0.
    So, I don't know what else can do... If I roll back to Explorer 9, the problem disappears, however another user with IE9 experiences the same problem. FF works fine.
    Could you give me please another idea to resolve the data?
    Regards,
    Artem

  • Very Bad performance when previewing song in iTunes 9 through new interface

    Hi, Since upgrading to the new iTunes (9.0.2) I cannot preview the music any longer without many stops in the preview for the computer to re-buffer the download. There are so many that you cant listen to the song as you only get clips that seem to be less than a second long.
    Before upgrading to 9 the previews played perfect. I then also went out to my AppleTV and tried to preview music which played perfect with no stops.
    On further investigation in iTunes I recognized that if I go to the Browse area of iTunes (4 buttons down under your name where it says Welcome (and your name) on the Main menu of the iTunes store (not in music or movies etc)) I can still preview songs perfect with no interruptions! This area (the browse area) still displays music in the old way that iTunes 8 did with blue and white strips separating each song and the old buy buttons.
    So the problem seems to only be happening in the areas of the iTunes store that has the new feature set in iTunes 9 for displaying and previewing music.
    I also tried to go into the preferences to see if I could set settings to download the whole preview first before playing but that has been removed.
    Finally I was in a hotel last week and tried to preview music and it worked fine in the preview. However, I find it hard to believe that it is a speed problem in my house since the ATV works perfect and the previews in the browse area play perfect.
    This problem is happening on my home iMac / my Power book (3 years old) and my sons power book (1 year old). I am also up-to-date with all updates from the system side.
    Any suggestions?
    Alfredo

    I have the same issue. It wasn't this bad until recently and my bandwidth has increased if anything. Terribly annoying. It very adversely affects my iTunes store experience and encourages me to look elsewhere for music.
    Yes, I have the buffer control set to large. Why don't they have an option to download the whole preview before playing like they used to?
    Any solutions?
    Message was edited by: John Cover

  • MBP SSD - Very Bad Performance via BlackMagic

    What's up guys, I decided to run a blackmagic SSD r/w test because it's been a while since I have... just to see where I'm at.  I was very dissapointed, I remember when this thing was new I was getting around 700mb read... now it's somewhere around 400mb r/w.  Others are getting 700+ so I just don't get what happened here?
    I have the late MBP retina 15" (2.7ghz, 16gb ram, Mavericks OS, 500gb w/ 40gb free space)
    Any ideas on what I need to do here, should I just do a clean install?

    You should really have a little more free space available. The number I've seen is 15%. You've got less than 10. It's an easy test. Offload some stuff, repair the disk, and run the test again.

  • CMP 6.1 Entity bad performance.

    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session bean method: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? Should I use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all the application on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS (weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    Thanks

    Historically its hard to get good performance & scalability out of sybase
    without using stored procs. Using dynamic sql on sybase just doesnt do as
    well as procs. Oracle on the other hand can get very close to stored proc
    speed out of well written dynamic sql.
    As far as weblogic goes, my experience is the focus of their testing for db
    related stuff is Oracle, then DB2, then MSSQLServer. Sybase is usually last
    on the list.
    As far as the 6.1 cmp, haven't used it much, but because of these other
    things I would be cautious about using it with Sybase.
    Joel
    "Antoine Bas" <[email protected],> wrote in message
    news:3cc7cdcf$[email protected]..
    >
    I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
    around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
    When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session beanmethod: around
    90 ms.
    I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
    to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? ShouldI use EJB
    2.0 to have significant perf ?
    Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all theapplication on stored
    procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
    My config:
    WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
    SGBD: Sybase
    Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS(weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
    >
    Thanks

  • How to solve bad performance in vi server

    I'm useing vi server in a recursively programming structure in labview 7.1.
    I have very bad performance result so i made a test comparing the speed of che various vi server call and the native.
    my tests are:
    normal calling.
    vi server calling by reference node
    vi server calling by invoke node
    for each vi server calling type i tried:
    unique reference calling
    different reference calling
    different reference, preloaded,  calling
    the only 1 case i found a loosing of performace acceptable 24% respect the normal calling: vi server calling by reference node with unique reference.
    unfortunately this kind of calling is able to catch come kind of recunsion an forbidden it and this calling wait all the time the end of the execution of the vi called.
    All the oter kinds of caling have very bad performance: from 90% to 99,9% LESS then the normal calling (10 to 1000 times more in execution time).
    In addition there is a prblem in invoke colling: if you execute a invoke node with wait until done true, the mouse pointer fliks with the busy icone. that heppens in all the possible configuration.
    I would like ti know if someuone as some solution to this performance problem and if Labview 8.0 fixs this problems.
    Best regarda.
    ing. Luca Benvegnù

    Hi Luca,
    I've made some researches for you and, what can I say is that there is a certain number of requests about "vi server performances". There are some things that are in general suggested in this situation:
    1) Be "minimalist" about the use of images, graph,... And avoid Large data structures: wiring large structures into/out-of sub-VI's can take time: pass the smallest amount of data.
    2) Avoid repeated calls. Calling the sub-VI's frequently, in a loop for example, create a call over-head that could be an issue. For the same reason put the "wait until" function with a specification of time in order to run loops only as often as strictly required.
    However, about your question of fixing the problem with LabVIEW 8.0, I suggest you to download the Evaluation Version of LabVIEW 8.2 and try by yourself if performances are better.
    I hope I've been of some help.
    carlo>  

  • Master column tree - bad performance

    Hello,
    I have a table with master column that uses recursive node without Load Children event. the whole table loads at startup. I Have very bad performance : every click on the little triangle takes about 6-7 seconds, and there is even no round-trip to server because all data is already at the client!
    I need to show list of products by there family (50 families, each has 10 products). How can i imporve my performance (maybe server configuration or my code or another method)
    I work with ep 7 sp12.
    Thanks
    Roni.

    Hi Roni,
    Yes, you have to manipulate the add element on before loading the tree.  Best Practice is to use onLoadChildren event. Loading the tree at once will always have performance issues.
    Refer to these tutorial for creating tree using onLoadChildren event.
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webdynpro/wd%20java/wd%20tutorials/constructing%20a%20recursive%20and%20loadable%20web%20dynpro%20tree.pdf">Recursive Loadable Tree</a>
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/webdynpro/wd%20java/wd%20tutorials/integration%20of%20a%20tree%20structure%20in%20a%20web%20dynpro%20table.pdf">Integration of Tree Structure in Table</a>
    There are no limitations on this UI control, you can stay with any number of levels.
    Regards
    Srikanth

  • Bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

    bought i phone 6 64 GB just 3 days before performance is very bad.Couldn't even open app store it takes too much time for opening a web page.

    You may need to reset your network settings, making sure the network you're accessing is stable: tap Settings > General > Reset > Reset Network Settings.
    If your iPhone still can't connect to App Store, tap Settings > iTunes & App Store > tap the Apple ID and sign out > later, sign in with your Apple ID.

  • Is it possible to set the performance in Camera Raw, like in PS? I have problems with the performance of the adjustment brush. It is a very bad workflow.

    I have problems with the performance of the adjustment brush. It is a very bad workflow.

    Had you specified you're on Windows, I wouldn't even have replied. I don't do windows.
    Yes, it has been a waste of time for both you and me.
    You don't even know how to ask a question properly and you want me to read the FAQs?  Hah! 
    No one will take your word for "ACR latest version", and "PS CC latest VersionVersion [sic]", as many users believe they are fully updated when they are not. Exact version numbers are needed.
    8 GB is considered the realistic minimum to run Photoshop CC, but it's far from optimal—on any platform.  There are other factors that can be at play and which you don't specify, such as the space available on each of your hard drives, whether you have a physically separate, dedicated hard drive for Photoshop's scratch drive, what video card you have and how much VRAM does it have, what your graphics settings are in Photoshop's Preferences > Performance, etc.
    That's why I had indicated a link for you to read:
    Please read this FAQ for advice on how to ask your questions correctly for quicker and better answers: 
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/419981?tstart=0
    If you read that link in its entirety and provide the pertinent information, maybe some of the Windows experts will be able to help you out.
    Now I'm out of here.

  • AIR application performance is very bad(slow)

    I have an AIR application developed using Flash CS3. The
    issue is application performance is very bad(slow) when the OS
    (Windows XP) display property setting is in 16 bit color mode. When
    the display property setting is changed to 32 bit color mode
    applications performance is good and faster.
    Application has used lots of color gradients, tween
    animations.
    System Configuration:
    Windows XP (SP2)
    1 GB RAM
    INTEL P4 , 1.5 GHz Processor Speed.
    Can any one explain that is there any issue with Flash Player
    or AIR runtime.

    quote:
    Originally posted by:
    cyberKafka
    I also understand that creating windows via AS (not MXML)
    could help a bit (apparently a lot with memory allocation. have not
    tested myself thou.)
    Do you have a link for any more info on this? Sounds
    interesting.

  • Bad performance when open a bi publisher report in excel

    We use bi publisher(xml publisher) to create a customized report. For a small report, user like it very much. But for a bigger report, users complain about the performance when they open the file.
    I know it is not a native excel file, that may cause the bad performance. So I ask my user to save it to a new file as a native excel format. The new file still worse than a normal excel file when we open it.
    I did a test. We try to save a bi publish report to excel format, the size shrink to 4Mb. But if we "copy all" and "Paste Special" value only to a new excel file, the size is only 1Mb.
    Do I have any way to improve that, users are complaining everyday. Thanks!
    I did a test today.
    I create a test report
    Test 1: Original file from BIP in EBS is 10Mb. We save it in my local disk, when we open the file, it takes 43 sec.
    Test 2: We save the file in native excel format, the file size is 2.28Mb, it takes 7 sec. to open.
    Test 3: We copy all cell and "PasteSpecial" to a new excel file with value only. The file size is 1.66Mb, it takes only 1 sec to open.
    Edited by: Rex Lin on 2010/3/31 下午 11:26

    EBS or Standalone BIP?
    If EBS see this thread for suggestions on performance tuning and hints and tips:
    EBS BIP Performance Tuning - Definitive Guide?
    Note also that I did end up rewriting my report as PL/SQL producing a csv file and have done with several large reports in BIP on EBS.
    Cheers,
    Dave

  • Laser Jet P1008 - Very Bad Performanc​e

    I have been using HP LaserJet P1008 since 06th june 2008. It worked very nicely during the 2 months only. after that it started to show some problems. we changed its Toner atleast 3 times due to poor quality print outs. Now a days,apart from poor quality print outs,the printer is not respnding on time to the print request.To get a single page print out we need to wait for long time.I tried many times to rectify the problem by calling a technincian, but the thing is still not working properly. What should I do to fix this problem? Is there any option to exchange this printer with a better one by giving additional amount? Thanks

    1GHz AMD Dual-Core E1-2100 APU processor is a big let down, whichever brand laptop it is.
    Actually, 1GHz is the minimum requirement for Windows 8/8.1 Operating system.
    It is the bottlenecking factor for the bad performance you're getting. And the processor is not replaceable also unless you're going for the whole board replacement -
    http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c04162986.pdf
    Regards
    Visruth
    ++Please click KUDOS / White thumb to say thanks
    ++Please click ACCEPT AS SOLUTION to help others, find this solution faster
    **I'm a Volunteer, I do not work for HP**

  • Reporting on master data customer and bad performances : any workaround ?

    Hello,
    I've been asked to investiguate on bad performances encountered when performing reporting
    on the specific master data zcustomer.
    Basically this master data has a quite similar design that 0customer, there are 96000 entries in the master data table.
    A simple query has been developed : the reporting is done on the master data zcustomer and its attributes : no key figure, no calculation, no restriction ...
    Nevertheless, the query can not be executed .. the query runs around 10 minute in rsrt, then the private memory is exhausted and then a short dump is generated.
    I tried to buid a very simple query on 0customer, this time, without the attributes ... and it took more than 30 sec before I get the results.
    I checked the queries statistics :
    3.x Analyzer Server 10 sec
    OLAP: Read Texts : 20 sec
    How is it that it is so long to performthe reporitng on those master data, while in the same time If i try to display the content in SAP by choosing "maintain master data", I have an immediate answer.
    I there any workaround ?
    Any help would be really appreciated.
    thank you.
    Raoul

    Hi.
    How much data have you got in the cube?
    If you make no restrictions, you are asking the system to return data for all 96.000 customers. That is one thing that might take some time.
    Also, using the attributes of this customer object, fx making selection or displaying several of them, means that the system has to run through the 96.000 records in masterdata to know what goes where in the report.
    When you display the masterdata, you are by default displaying just the 250 or so first hits, and you are not joining against any cube or sorting the result set, so that is fast.
    You should make some kind of restriction on other things than zcustomer (time, org.unit, version, etc, to limit the dataset from the cube, but also a restriction on one of the zcustomer attribs, with an index for that maybe, and performance should improve.
    br
    Jacob

  • Bad performance with brandnew system

    hello,
    i set up a completely new win7-64bit based on a fresh osx (snow-leopard update) on a fresh harddisk....and i have very bad 3d performance with only 3 (!!) programs installed. i am working with autodesk 3ds max and autocad and both run very slow. my last system was win7-64bit, too, but running MUCH faster.
    it must be a driver problem, but i dont know how to change the nvidia driver.
    edit:
    after having changed driver from directx 9 to open-gl performance is very fast.
    please help.
    alex
    Message was edited by: mbp_3d

    Hi Bruno
        In the following Re: Generic Sync: Object can not be deserilized / Multiple synchronization call you had mentioned that you are using MI 2.5 SP16 Client.  For your information MI doesnt support Windows Mobile 5 OS on SP16 but only from SP18 does it support this OS.  Have you tried upgrading the client to any of the SPs i had mentioned in the above thread and then checked the performance?
    Best Regards
    Sivakumar

Maybe you are looking for