Very high data traffic generated by Nokia Messagin...

Is anyone else seeing really high data use on their phone log following last week's Messaging outage?
Up until last week's outage, the data traffic generated by Messaging was about 5kb an hour (with no new emails sent or received). Presumably this small amount of data traffic results from the Nokia email server "pinging" the phone periodically to keep the connection open.
But after last week's outage and issues with passwords being requested etc etc, I saw that the data traffic generated by the Messaging app has gone through the roof - about 400 - 500kb an hour! Again, this is with no new emails sent or received - so theoretically is just the server pinging the phone to keep the idle connection open!
I reinstalled Nokia Messaging on my phone (E61i) - no difference - the data generated by the Messaging app is still 400 - 500 kb an hour (it stops when I take Messaging offline).
I have friends roaming in Ireland and their phone has had the same problem - the data traffic generated by their Messaging app is sky high and they have had to shut it down because of the high cost of data whilst roaming.
I also newly installed Messaging on another phone (N95) that I have, using a brand new email account and a new T-mobile SIM card, and guess what - that phone also has sky high data traffic due to Messaging.
What is going on?? Can someone at Nokia Messaging please sort this out? Anyone roaming with Nokia Messaging enabled is facing hugh data charges from their network.

The data traffic occurs in phones which are on a home network (mine in the UK) and on a roaming network (my friends traveling in Ireland). Interestingly, I've now checked with another friend who is roaming in Italy and they also use Messaging but haven't seen any high packet data issues with their phone.
The data traffic shows up in the Packet Log, as well as on the actual T-Mobile network account (plus the charges for the data!) Accessing a T-Mobile UK account online shows all packet data use - in this case, 120-150 kb every 15 minutes, whereas before last week it was 1-2kb every 15 minutes.
When I "Go Offline" with Nokia Messaging, the high data traffic stops, both on the Packet Log and network account, so I am 100% certain this is due to Messaging.

Similar Messages

I am receiving bills from my carrier with very high data usage. I read books from apple store. Do ibooks use gb once purchased?

I am receiving bills from my carrier with very high data usage. I read books from apple store. Do ibooks use gb once purchased?

To reduce data usage, you should put iPad on Aeroplane Mode to stop all background activities when not using iPad.
Message was edited by: Diavonex

Very high network traffic to printer

I am seeing very high network traffic between my Mac (iMac, running Mavericks) and my printer, a Canon MP640, connected via Ethernet. This is when the printer is idle. According to Little Snitch, the traffic is on the order of about 50 kB/s! The network traffic comes from mDNSresponder, and is directed to canonmp640.local; it is using UDP port 5353, which seems to be the mDNS port (again, according to Little Snitch). The traffic of course goes away if the printer is off, but it needs to remain on because it is being used as a printer for other computers/devices around the house.
Is this amount of network traffic for an idle printer normal? Anyone has any idea how to stop it from doing that? I even captured some of that traffic using Little Snitch, but nothing that provided any insight to me...
Thanks in advance for any help or suggestion!

mDNSresponder is the Bonjour agent. Perhaps your printer is connecting as a Bonjour printer. See Disable Bonjour by turning off mDNSResponder - OS X Daily and OS X: How to disable Bonjour service advertising without .... I would also do a little Google search on "mdnsresponder." Also, you may want to contact Canon tech support.

Very high data block waits

I have one table xxxx in a tablespace tbx and the tablespace tbx has only 1 datafile. The table xxxx size is 890MB w/ 14 millions records. The datafile size is 2048MB. This table is a frequently access with insert/delete/select. The system spends alot of time waiting on this datafile. If I create a new tablespace abc with 20 datafiles worth about 100MB each, would it help reducing the data block wait count? The pctfree/pctused is 10/40 respectively.
Can anyone please give me an how to resolve this?

I am looking at an Oracle Statistics. We use SAN technology with RAID 0+1 Striped across all disks.
First I use this query to get the wait statistics:
select time, count, class
from v$waitstat
order by time, count;
From this query above, I got this result and database just been up 02/17/2004, just about 4 days ago:
TIME COUNT CLASS
0 0 sort block
0 0 save undo block
0 0 save undo header
0 0 free list
0 0 bitmap block
0 0 unused
0 0 system undo block
0 0 system undo header
0 0 bitmap index block
10 10 extent map
48 656 undo header
271 853 undo block
301 730 segment header
780382 1214405 data block
Then I use this query to find which datafile is being hit the most:
select count, file#, name
from x$kcbfwait, v$datafile
where indx + 1 = file#
order by count desc;
The query above returned:
COUNT     FILE#     NAME
473324     121     /xx/xx_ycm_tbs_03_01.dbf
104179     120     /xx/xx_ycm_tbs_02_01.dbf
93336     118     /xx/xx_idx_tbs_03_01.dbf
93138     119     /xx/xx_idx_tbs_03_02.dbf
80289     90     /xx/xx_datafile67.dbf
64044     108     /xx/xx_ycm_tbs_01_01.dbf
61485     41     /xx/xx_datafile25.dbf
61103     21     /xx/xx_datafile8.dbf
57329     114     /xx/xx_ycm_tbs_01_02.dbf
29338     5     /xx/xx_datafile02.dbf
29101     123     /xx/xx_idx_tbs_04_01.dbf
file# 121 is in a tablespace with this only datafile and this tablespace hold only one table. file#120 is the same thing, it's in another tablespace and only one table in that tablespace.
At the same time, i use TOP in Solaris I see iowait range between 5-25% during busy hour.

Extremely high 3g traffic since updating my iPhone 4 to iOS 5

Hi!
Since I updated my iPhone 4 to iOS 5.0 I recogniced that my device is generating extreme high amounts of traffic on 3G.
Sometimes 60MB each day (= 1,8 GB traffic per month, but only 1GB data option, could get expensive)!!! Before updating I had this traffic in about a week or so.
I have already shut down ALL sync services, I am not logged in to GameCenter or other services.
Before updating to iOS 5.0 I also used Twitter & FANCY and so on, these apps generates a lot of traffic when using them several times each day.
Now I have already deleted Twitter and FANCY and some other apps and anyway the traffic generated by the OS itself is really huge!!!
Anyone has the same problem or anyone can help me finding the reason for this high traffic in iOS 5.0??
Also some location services are permanently running and are killing the battery within a day... Why are they always turned on?
Now I turned off all location services and the battery life is still bad - only 1,5 days with low usage (former 3 or 4 days)...
Please help!!
Thanks in advance,
Wolfgang

Hi Urs
I searched a lot and maybe found a part of the reason for this high data traffic.
I'm synchronizing my contacts, calendar & reminder with iCloud & my mail with Hotmail.
When push is activated for Hotmail, that doesn't matter, but when push is activated for iCloud, the amount of data nearly explodes. So I turned iCloud to manual and let Hotmail on push.
Contacts, calendar & reminder are synchronizing when opened (I think this is enough).
Also I do a backup on iCloud and than I deactivate the function (I do not delete the last backup, I only deactivate the option for automatic backup).
It seems, that the backup functionality also generates traffic when not on WiFi - especially at night!!
The battery life has been getting better, when I deactivated the support for automatic time zone changes (location services were always on).
The battery finaly got MUCH BETTER since the update on iOS 5.0.1.
My traffic is actually higher than on iOS 4 but not so high as before I deactivated some services...
I hope this info is a little help for you!!
Let me know if this works for you, ok?
Best regards,
Wolfgang

1300 wireless bridge secured data traffic encryption --high

   Hi All,
I am looking secured encrypt configuration for the 1300 bridge wireless network . i have below configuration please suggest any change or modification on the configuration .
network topology
R1--------------SW1<-----------------> root bride-1 <---------------------------> Non-root bridge-1 <------------------------ >SW2( remote office)--------LAN hosts
SW1- Gi0/0- 10.200.32.1/29            BVI- 32.2/29                               BVI - 32.3/29                                   SW2-GI0/0 - 32.4/29
network setup : SW1 - LAN port to root bridge connection -- Gi 0/0 - ip address configured -10.200.32.1/29
                         Root-brdge -------------------------------------------- BVI 10.200.32.2/29 -----
                         Non root bridge----------------------------------------BVI 10.200.32.3/29
                         SW2 LAN port-Non root bridge ----------------- Gi0/0 10.200.32.4/29
both bridge have only BVI configured and no VLAN or subniterface on the both bridge .
SW1 and SW2 port connected to bridges are not part of vlan , ports configured with specfic IP address
Below is bridge configration . I would like to know with this below configuration data traffic will get compelete encrytion ??? or any security threat ?? . please suggest
dot11 ssid
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa
   wpa-psk ascii 7 123456
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm
station-role root bridge
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
hold-queue 80 in
interface BVI1
ip address 10.200.32.2 255.255.255.248
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 10.200.32.1
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
************************************Configuration on non root bridge.******************************************************************
dot11 ssid
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa
   wpa-psk ascii 7 123456
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
hold-queue 80 in
interface BVI1
ip address 10.200.32.3 255.255.255.248
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 10.200.32.2
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip

Thanks Scott. We can go as high as we need to clear the fresnel zone. There is nothing but an empty parking lot in between the 2 building and about 1500 - 2000 feet of space but I have not done a site survey to see about the 2.4Ghz. I think we are going to need different antennae as well correct? I think the internal ones only go about 626 feet or so. I was thinking about using AIR-ANT3338. your thoughts.
Thanks in advance!

Very high "Control File" IOStat -- Reads: Data = 70G

What could cause the IOStat value for "Control File -- Reads: Data" to be very high relative to the IOStat value "Data File" for example? In looking at one AWR report I see a value of 70G for "Control File -- Reads: Data" while the "Data File -- Reads: Data" value is only 20G.

user11976449 wrote:
What could cause the IOStat value for "Control File -- Reads: Data" to be very high relative to the IOStat value "Data File" for example? In looking at one AWR report I see a value of 70G for "Control File -- Reads: Data" while the "Data File -- Reads: Data" value is only 20G.post results from following SQL
SELECT * FROM V$VERSION;
over what duration was the AWR report.
please post FORMATTED excerpts from AWR report so we can see for ourselves what you report.

Is there any way to find out what caused Push Services to generate 22 MEGAbytes of data traffic in less than 20 minutes?

Fortunately I was on Wifi when that happened, but my 500 MB data could run out quickly that way. According to Dataman it happened only once and I used only one other application at that time. Testing the same app with comparable usage didn't yield the same excessive data traffic. Normally Push Services comes to about 4MB per day (which in my opinion is already a lot). Though I use Wifi whereever I can, I am now really reluctant to have cellular data enabled and that's completely NOT the point of having a smartphone, or is it?
I hope someone can shed some light on this.

Sorry no, there isn't a way to turn off those reminders.
You can send Apple a feedback here http://www.apple.com/feedback/

Which perspectives I should consider about Av Rd(ms) is very high just for

db version: 11.1.7
os: RH linux 5.5
I was seeing i/o stats from AWR generated for one hour, and all the value of Av Rd(ms) for files i/o stats are under around 10, however except for one file, the Av Rd(ms) just for one data file is very high(38325.25), even Av Rd(ms) of the others data files which are on same mount point with that one file are also normal, so I think this should be caused by application, however I can not find out clue.
so could you please give me some perspectives to be considered and to be researched? thanks so much!

RLUO wrote:
db version: 11.1.7
os: RH linux 5.5
I was seeing i/o stats from AWR generated for one hour, and all the value of Av Rd(ms) for files i/o stats are under around 10, however except for one file, the Av Rd(ms) just for one data file is very high(38325.25), even Av Rd(ms) of the others data files which are on same mount point with that one file are also normal, so I think this should be caused by application, however I can not find out clue.
so could you please give me some perspectives to be considered and to be researched? thanks so much!Look at the v$event_histogram report for anything to to with file reads. It's possible that you will find that a single read request got an extremely high time - I've seen odd glitches occasionall, with a single block read taking (apparently) several weeks to complete - and that you can ignore the side effects .
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

How to totally turn off data traffic when using ma...

Nokia N8-00:
I only use the integrated gps and have turned off the assisted gps, net based gps and Wi-Fi/Network but when accessing maps it still generates data traffic.
Normally this is´nt a problem but when traveling abroad data traffic costs a small fortune.
In my old N95 when I downloaded offline maps and turned everything but integrated gps off there was no data traffic at all but even after the latest maps updates (i.e. yesterday) it appears that the maps still needs downloading when accessed...
Any suggestions how to completely avoid data traffic when using maps?

Set all destinations to always ask and select no whenever the phone gives you a request, set Maps to offline, and set location to just use intergrated GPS. By the way, just been to Portugal using Vodafone and data charges only about £5 for week, and they've just improved allowances, may be worth checking your service providers web site and see if it's necessary to bother about data roaming, they all tend to follow each other, and Data roaming charges in europe seem to be coming down !
If I have helped at all, a click on the White Star is always appreciated :
you can also help others by marking 'accept as solution'

Very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO

Hi There; I’m an ‘Accidental DBA’ with a problem (is there any other kind?).
We seem to be getting very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO; with a WaitCount of around 20 million hits per 24 hour period (total wait time around 9 hours in that same period).
I’ve spent a lot of time researching this wait and as I understand it ASYNC_NETWORK_IO is most often caused by the application not consuming data fast enough; so we had a programmer work through the code and resolve all locations where we are using a IQueryable
in a for next loop and converting them immediately into arrays (Linq To SQL).
This seems to have made no difference.
I would like to set up an extended event trace to find which queries are generating this particular wait, but at an average of over 200 hits per second I’m concerned about performance impact such a trace might have.
I’m looking for suggestions as to how to move forward in resolving this issue.
My first question is, am I correct in thinking that the number of these waits that we are getting is excessively high?
Assuming that is the case how can I go about tracing the offending queries without hammering the system?
If (as I suspect) it is not individual queries that are causing the issue, what else should I be looking for?
Thanks in advance
Paul.

Hi chaps
Thanks for the help.
We have about 100 concurrent users and they are always complaining about the application being slow, so the application is definitely not performing well.
Using activity monitor the cpu is normally at 20-60% and there are usually no more than 0-4 waiting tasks and a few hundred batch req/sec.
The only thing that stands out is the very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO, in terms of both wait time & wait count.
Raju, thank you for the link, I have read that blog post before in my research: the server is using only about 2.5% of the available bandwidth (1gb). Our network admin assures me that the network is set-up correctly. while it is possible that there are a
few badly written queries most of them are quite lean. Almost all of our processes use Linq to SQL, there are no bulk dataloads
You also said:
>I’ve spent a lot of time researching this wait and as I understand it ASYNC_NETWORK_IO
>is most often caused by the application not consuming data fast enough; so we had a
>programmer work through the code and resolve all locations where we are using a IQueryable
>in a for next loop and converting them immediately into arrays (Linq To SQL).
I'm not familiar with what kind of SQL that generates.
I asked about a design issue of too much data before, if you are using a low-level interface then the opposite is a question as well, even for modest amounts of data if you somehow use server-side cursors, or otherwise end up sending SQL commands for
just one row at a time, then you can get slow response and high asynch waits. I'm also not sure what you mean by having the programmer "resolve" these locations.
David also asks a good question whether there are just a couple of waits that throw off the totals. A similar but more design-oriented question is whether your app has some little widget that is always tickling SQL Server for an update, 100 users issuing
a one-line query once a second, to fill some tiny counter on the user screen, can have this same kind of effect.
Finally on the perceived app slowness *again* I would ask about design issues, I've seen apps that were very cleverly doing async, background data loads on ten hidden panels while the user gazed at their data. This was very heavily loading the system
for basically no good reason, but it wasn't SQL Server's fault.
Josh

Unexpected background data traffic?

Hi,
Just successfully connected and started using BT Broadband today via a Dell Studio 1749 and BT Home Hub3A.
However, when I connect a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop via an ethernet cable, after an expected initial burst of internet traffic, it settles down to a steady 10 KiB/s (approx.) of internet traffic both in the upload and download directions! I use a simple monitor utility of internet traffic called 'Netmeter' to view the activity.
The O/S on the Dimension is 'XP' with SP3 and has the latest Windows updates loaded. There are many applications loaded on the p.c., but using 'Task Manager' I cannot find any obvious rogue programmes or processes running that are the likely cause of the traffic! 'Norton Internet Security V18.6.0.29' is the anti-virus programme. My previous 'ISP' was 'O2' with a Thomson router, and there was no such activity when using that!
With 'BT Broadband Option 1' I'm obviously concerned that my 10GB download limit is being eaten into at a startling rate if I leave my 'Local Area Connection' enabled.
Not a lot to go on I appreciate, but does anyone have any ideas as to what might be causing the traffic, or how I can drill down deeper to find where the traffic is originating? Bit strange with similar levels of traffic being generated in both directions, almost as if some kind of 'loopback' on the network card is in operation.
I would add that when I use a 'dongle' from Orange, there is no such problem! I have an old Netgear wireless adapter which I've yet to plug into a USB port and see if that behaves in the same manner.
Thanks

Ectophile wrote:
It's not easy to see what programs are transmitting data. It could be almost anything trying to do an auto-update.
If all else fails, then there are tools such as Wireshark (http://www.wireshark.org/) which will look at the individual packets going back and forth. But unless you're conversant with the details of Internet protocol, that can be a bit daunting.
Agreed. Ah..Wireshark, that brings back memories....I remember using that in the dim and distant past. Thanks for the reminder. Know what you mean about Internet protocols, but I should really have a good idea as for my sins I was in the Datacomms business up until I retired a few years back....but I'm a little rusty these days
I know I've made no changes to the desktop since having changed ISPs, the only difference is connecting to a different router, so it leads me to thinking it's more to do with interaction with the Home Hub compared with the Thomson router!
I don't believe it's an application running an auto update as the traffic flow is almost equal in both directions and not at a high rate. Were it an update, I'd expect high data rate in the receive direction and the occasional ack/nak in the transmit path!
When I get some time, think I'll dig out Wireshark and see what it comes up with...thanks.

E52 Mfe heavy data traffic

Hi,
We are using E series phones for Mail and Calender in my Company.
I have on my new E52 discovered that Syncronization with Mfe is using between 130-140kb on each sync, this compared to E51/E66 that uses around 6-7kb for Sync. This is every sync, even with no new messages.
Doing sync every 15 min, 10 hours a day, this is getting VERY expensive, paying around 1,5€ for each MB, it sums up to 7-8€ daily, this is not acceptable.
Why is Nokia Mail 2.0.5 so traffic consuming?
Dennis

Has anybody else looked at the Data traffic for mail on the E52?
if not on an unlimited service, this will get Expensive.

Very High messages not forwarded to SAP out of the Business Hours

Dear Gurus,
I work for a SAP partner and we have the Solution Manager 7.0 + EHP1, SP stack 24, running under a Windows Server Machine with MS Sqlserver Data Base and we're facing the following problem:
In between the business hours we are able to forward messages to SAP manually, however, after the business hours, messages set as 'very high' priority aren't being forwarded automatically to SAP.
We have already triple checked the configs listed on the SAP Notes 1084744, as well ran the Z-Report included in the note 1225682, however no success at all.
Would you kindly please shed a light on this matter?
Thank you in advance.
Everton.

Hello Everton,
If you are a var Customer using the transaction type ZLFN and action profile ZSLFN0001_ADVANCED, the action profile should be AI_SDK_STANDARD.
I don't now if that is the case.
If your issue persists, please trigger a message in SV-SMG-SUP.
Best regards,
Guilherme

Re: How to disable MIG 7 Traffic Generator in simulation

Hi Everyone,
I was wondering how can I disable vivado traffic generator in simulation?
I have fine tune my DDR channel and need to disable traffic generator for simulation purposes, however, I don't see any option in MIG7 GUI interface, or any parameter that I can pass to traffic generator from my top level simulaion file to stop traffic generator for issuing command and putting random rd/wr data on my DDR bus.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Mike

Hi,
If you generate the IP alone there will not any tarffic gen, only example design comes with tarffic gen(right click on .xci and choose example design)
So while generating the IP there is no GUI option to disable traffci gen.
But if you attempt to link user deisgn top with memory model then you have to be ultimately careful in passign the parameters and mapping the signals
instead if you are running MIG example design simulation but wanted to drive your own tarffic, you can simply commet out tarffic gen in example_top and have your own fsm for driving the MIG user intefrace.
Hope this helps
-Vanitha

Very high data traffic generated by Nokia Messagin...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for