Very high temp. with GNB MAX

Hello, i have a problem with my MSI GNB MAX motherboard and my p4 3,06 ghz
My cpu temperatures are very high, with a maximum of 85/86c,,, is this normal??
Anyone else having a similar problem like this?
MSI GNB MAX (ms-6565) motherboard
P4 3,06 ghz processor with standaard p4 cooler
1024 mb DDR 266 mhz (dual) memory
Geforce 4 mx videocard
60Gb Maxtor ATA133 HD
Promedium Mars case with a total of 6 fans
(not overclocked)

If Vcor is 1.4 (I'm running 1.525 but reads 1.47 in PCAlert), AND fsb is set for 134, AND your HSF is running AND has good contact, there is no way for it to be that hot. The stock HSF is a pretty good part. I would suggest getting a temperature probe and touching it to the base edge of the HSF to see if you are really that hot. In Bios, I have the cut off threshold at 65C and alarm at 63C. I dont know the exact conversion but 86C is near hot enough to boil water. The laquer from the chip would probably begin to melt and create an odor.

Similar Messages

I have an imac 27 inch O SX 10.6.8. using iphoto 11 Version 9.1.5. I have scanned some photos at very high resolution with each photo being about 45MB. They're saved to desktop. How can I reduce the size of the scanned photo's they are crashing iphoto

I have an imac 27 inch O SX 10.6.8. using iphoto 11 Version 9.1.5. I have scanned some photos at very high resolution with each photo being about 45MB. They're saved to desktop. How can I reduce the size of the scanned photo's they are crashing iphoto.

What format are they? Tiif? Jpeg? You can compress them with a lot of apps - including Preivew and just about any graphics editor out there. I'm not sure that 45mb would crash iPhoto thogh, are yo sure that's the cause? I know that some folks have mentioned pixel dimensions causing issues, as can color profiles.
Regards
TD

Very high temp, but no problems at all!!!

Ok I got this k7n2-l last month. When I installed it with my 1800 xp, the temps would hover about 60 to 75 c. So I went and bought a new cpu cooler( therm vol 7) adn applied some artic silver 2. no change in temps. this cpu ran like 30 to 40c in my old k7s5a board with retail cpu fan. So I went and bought a xp 2200. and had them install it pro installed with retail cpu fan and thermal pad. now my temp hover between 70 and 100 c. the funny thing is I have never had a crash or any system problems what so ever. And I play counter-strike everyday. I ordered a ther volc 9 with some artic silver 3. But doesnt this seem weird. that I get these high temps and my system is very stable. I even oc'd the 2200 to a 2400 and get the same temp readings. I think the temp is wrong. Oh and I'm reading it from the bios and pc alert 4. what do you guys think?

With a Duron 800 and a Thermalright SK-5 and a 60 MM fan blowing about 12 CFM i was sitting around 120 F. I installed a Valcano 9 and the temp whent up to 131 F. I thougth i installed it wrong so i took it off, cleaned it and re aplied some Arctic Alumnia and the temp was stilla round 130 F. I took it off, put the SK-5 back on and it dropped to around 124 F. I took the 80 MM fan off the Valcano 9 and placed it on the SK-5. The temp whent down to around 118 F. Needless to say the Valcano 9 heatsink is a peice of . Or my first generation old ass SK-5 is badder asser. But i dought that seeing the I was getting the same temps with a $8 CoolerMaster.
Now with my Athlon 1700+ @ 195x10 I hover around 127 - 131 F with the Thermaltake fan from the Valcano 9 at its lowest setting, compleatly silent, spinning about 2500 RPM's.
I attached the sensor from the Valcano 9 to the bottem of the Proc whith some thermal tape. With a little re-wiring i ran it into my Vantec NXP 201. What ever it reports is usally around 3 - 5 C lower then the Bios. Usually around 48 C. I thought the Bios temps where way off. But now lookign at it i'm not so sure they are. If the temp in the Bios is being taken fromthe core of the Proc and the temp on the Vantec Nesus is being taken from the bottom of the proc, and theres only a free degrees difrence, i'm not sure the Bios is wrong.
This is on an ILSR BTW..

GT60 0NE new EC getting very high temps

Hi , i have a GT60 0ne with gtx680m. I just update the firmware n bios but the new EC which i download (16F3EMS1.413.zip) from the msi site is making my gpu pretty hot. Temps used to be 79-80 on full load and
now my highs are like getting onto 90s and it seems the fan doesnt scale very well with the temps. It is much more quiet in fact after the new EC update but its making my gpu running like an oven.
Any advice or help would be appreciated.
Thank you

Quote from: trigger25sg on 24-November-12, 05:20:18
Hi flobelix and thanks for the clarification. I just flashed back the old EC from msi china as most msi sites have been updated with the new EC. Yup its loud but i think i have more peace of mind.
Thank you.
which old version is this?

GeForce NX8600GTS-T2D256EZ, Very High Temp; should I be concerned?

Hello,
I have the MSI GeForce 8600 GTS NX8600GTS-T2D256EZ-HD. I just opened the case and realized it runs really hot; I can barely touch the copper pipes or the aluminum heat sink. I have a Silenex Fan right under it and some air flows over the surfaces. For reference, the 975X chips/heat sinks are near room temp.
Anyone notice this issue? Should I be concerned about a video card in the computer that run this hot? If so, any suggestions for cooling? I have P182 case and 5 fans.
Scott

Quote from: jsmartin22 on 15-July-07, 13:41:39
Had no idea what these were, but searched/read. Downloaded & installed Nvidia Ntune, which added features to the control panel, including temp monitoring. GPU Temp is 48c, and I can't imagine that is an issue, right?
Thx for the good suggestion; I appreciate it!
Scott
nop, GPU can running very hot without to worry about. 80-90C underload temp can be expected.
if you don't have real issues don't worry about the temp.

Do all the PowerBooks get to very high temps?

My PowerBook G4 gets to 185 (85 celsius)

My PowerBook G4 gets to 185 (85 celsius)
Hello Victor,
85°C? Wow! That's way too hot, at least for the 12" model. The fan is supposed to activate at 60°C. Recently my 12" PowerBook's fan has not activated - and my PB is overheating too, up to 72°C after 10-15 minutes of 100% CPU load running Folding@Home.
Let's try to help each other since no one else is answering our questions.
- Do you hear fan noise from your PB when it gets very hot?
- How are you monitoring the temperature? (I use X-Resource-Graph)
- What application(s) were you running when your PB heated to 85°C? Do you know the %CPU utilization? (as you may know already, you can see this in Activity Monitor)
- What was the last software update you installed on your PB?
- What did you do when you noticed how hot your PB was? Did you shut it off, or did it go to sleep by itself?
Thanks Victor - I'm sure that if we get a good thread going here, we can figure out these overheating problems.
Best wishes,
Jean
PowerBook G4 DVI 867 MHz Mac OS X (10.3.9) 640 Mb RAM, original 37+ Gb hard drive. Usually running Folding@Home (cpu-intensive)

CPU temp with Zalman9700 and MSI P965 Platinum ?

Hi.
its funny. My old Asrock DUAL-VSTA showed CPU temp and other temps in programs like HMonitor and Speedfan but this
MSI dosent show anything about CPU in any programs ?
I must say, i was a little confused when i installed the board because there was 2 CPU fan slots, one with 4 pins and one with
3. I have a Zalman CNPS 9700 LED, very nice fan btw. Shoulden this fan be controled by the CPU automaticly ? i do have a
fan regulator in the end of the wire outside the cabinet. I have it on the bag side of the computer case so i can turn it op and
down. But i think i read someware that it could be controled automaticly. Is that right ?
And what about the 3 and 4 pins CPU fan slots on the board. Right now i cant remember in witch of the 3 or 4 slot i installed
the fan in to. But anybody know witch slot is the right one for my CPU fan ?
http://techgage.com/article/zalman_9700led_cpu_cooler/1
http://www.zalman.co.kr/usa/product/view.asp?idx=70&code=017
http://www.zalmanusa.com/
Please if anybody could help here i would be extremely happy.
Mugge

Quote from: MuggeGHQ on 05-March-07, 09:44:13
Listen. Forgot to say.
I'm still a little little bit concerned about 40c-41c idle. but but.
Relax, it's quite alright...
Quote
But what i was trying to say is. I have 3 running SATA drives also and only the stock (Normal) 120 fan that came with the Antec case.
1 fan, the Zalman 9700LED and the PSU fan ofcause. and then OC at 300FSB. Could that be why i'm at 40c idle ?
All the drives + only 1 fan in the case ? i mean. I'm not shure the standard 120 fan that came with the Antec case is good enough.
Any sugestions ?
My case has three 120mm case fan in addition to the 120mm power supply and the Zalman fan, five of them altogether. The Antec P180 case has separate compartment for the hard drives and the power supply, which made a big difference from the temperature's perspective. The box also has four hard drives and I do not OC; I did try, but I didn't see much of a difference and shut it off.
Quote
btw. what is a good stress test apps to test my cpu temp with on max load ?
The Orthos Stress Prime is pretty good and so is Intel's TAT; the link I've posted earlier has more information.
Cr00zng

IPhone 4 OS 7.1.2 (11D257) display normal when switching on, turns to very high contrast primary colours only, no tonal graduation. Wifi no longer works.

iPhone 4 OS 7.1.2 (11D257) display normal when switching on, turns to very high contrast with bright primary colours only, no tonal graduation.Initially problem arose every time I switched the Camera on, but has worsened such that any application can cause it. In Camera, after a short time screen goes black. Also, Wifi no longer works.

You're welcome
In case you don't want to buy a new iPhone, Apple will replace the whole unit if you are willing to pay the service fee of 149$ for the iPhone4.
Out-of-warranty repair service
If your repair isn’t covered by Apple’s One Year Limited Warranty, AppleCare+, or AppleCare Protection Plan, your iPhone might be eligible for out-of-warranty service. For example, liquid damage isn’t covered by warranty but might be eligible for out-of-warranty service. Some damage isn’t eligible at all, for example if your device has been broken into multiple pieces. See Apple’s Repair Terms and Conditions for complete details.
Read Apple’s Repair Terms and Conditions
Model
Out-of-warranty service fee
Battery service*
iPhone 6 Plus
$329
$79
*available only if battery
fails Apple’s diagnostic test
iPhone 6
$299
iPhone 5s, iPhone 5c, iPhone 5
$269
iPhone 4s
$199
iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3G,
Original iPhone
$149
Plus a $6.95 shipping fee, if required. Fees are in USD and exclude local tax. Pricing is for service through Apple. The final service fee we charge will be determined during testing and may be less than the service fee listed above. Pricing and terms vary for service through an Apple Authorized Service Provider.
copied from Service Answer Center - iPhone

SG200 high "Packets With Errors"

Hi, I have a SG200-18 switch that's been in production for about 6 months. About a month ago we had a severe ice storm and everything lost power including the switch. Afterwards I started to see very high "Packets With Errors" in the interface statistics in the web gui. When looking at the Ethernet statistics, the errors are mainly "Internal MAC Receive Error" with only a few "Frame Check Sum" errors.
Before the power outtage I was seeing about 0.035% packets with errors on the heaviest loaded interface. After the power outtage I saw 1.60% packets with errors on the same interface. Other busy interfaces saw similar raise in packets with errors. Again these errors were mainly "Internal MAC Receive Error" with only a few "Frame Check Sum" errors.
I contacted Cisco and was told that the firmware could be corrupted and that I should update to the latest firmware version: 1.3.5.58 (I was running 1.3.0.62). I updated to the latest firmware (including updating the boot code). Verified that the md5 check sums listed on the web gui match that of the firmware files that I loaded onto the switch.
It's been a couple days since upgrading the switch firmware and I've noticed that the packets with errors has gone down; now around 0.3% on busiest interface. Should I be concerned by this number of packets with errors? What does "Internal MAC Receive Error" even mean?
Thank you.

Tom,
I've seen a similar issue on SG300 switches.
While I haven't completely eliminatated cabling issues (I can only continuity check the cables which are ducted and perviously terminiated and the continutity check is ok) I have had an increase in "Internal MAC Receive Error" counts following upgrades to 1.3.5.58 and 1.3.7.18 firmware versions.
In my case I have four switches connected in a star topology around a central switch and interconnected via LAG groups- three swtiches are showing error counts on some ports (a mix of LAG and single ports) and one has remained error free.
At least one LAG group is showing "Internal MAC Receive Errors" at one end of the LAG but not the other- this isn't the behaviour I'd expect from a cable fault.
The "Internal MAC Receive Error" counts appear to increase disproportionally when the port or LAG is under load (eg speed testing LAN connections between Ruckus AP and Zonedirector).
Is this type of behaviour consistent with what you have seen?
In your last posted you said:-
"But I've also found upgrading to 1.3.5.58 there is a lot of tail error in some situations and a factory reset and manual configuration clears those errors entirely"
Are you able to definie those situations any more? Is factory defaulting the switch and restoring a backup a workable sloution or should it be a completely manual restore (ie re-creating the configuration)?
I can of course try a factory default and manual configurationre- but it will take some time and planning to implement!
Kind Regards,
Andy.

Very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO

Hi There; I’m an ‘Accidental DBA’ with a problem (is there any other kind?).
We seem to be getting very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO; with a WaitCount of around 20 million hits per 24 hour period (total wait time around 9 hours in that same period).
I’ve spent a lot of time researching this wait and as I understand it ASYNC_NETWORK_IO is most often caused by the application not consuming data fast enough; so we had a programmer work through the code and resolve all locations where we are using a IQueryable
in a for next loop and converting them immediately into arrays (Linq To SQL).
This seems to have made no difference.
I would like to set up an extended event trace to find which queries are generating this particular wait, but at an average of over 200 hits per second I’m concerned about performance impact such a trace might have.
I’m looking for suggestions as to how to move forward in resolving this issue.
My first question is, am I correct in thinking that the number of these waits that we are getting is excessively high?
Assuming that is the case how can I go about tracing the offending queries without hammering the system?
If (as I suspect) it is not individual queries that are causing the issue, what else should I be looking for?
Thanks in advance
Paul.

Hi chaps
Thanks for the help.
We have about 100 concurrent users and they are always complaining about the application being slow, so the application is definitely not performing well.
Using activity monitor the cpu is normally at 20-60% and there are usually no more than 0-4 waiting tasks and a few hundred batch req/sec.
The only thing that stands out is the very high ASYNC_NETWORK_IO, in terms of both wait time & wait count.
Raju, thank you for the link, I have read that blog post before in my research: the server is using only about 2.5% of the available bandwidth (1gb). Our network admin assures me that the network is set-up correctly. while it is possible that there are a
few badly written queries most of them are quite lean. Almost all of our processes use Linq to SQL, there are no bulk dataloads
You also said:
>I’ve spent a lot of time researching this wait and as I understand it ASYNC_NETWORK_IO
>is most often caused by the application not consuming data fast enough; so we had a
>programmer work through the code and resolve all locations where we are using a IQueryable
>in a for next loop and converting them immediately into arrays (Linq To SQL).
I'm not familiar with what kind of SQL that generates.
I asked about a design issue of too much data before, if you are using a low-level interface then the opposite is a question as well, even for modest amounts of data if you somehow use server-side cursors, or otherwise end up sending SQL commands for
just one row at a time, then you can get slow response and high asynch waits. I'm also not sure what you mean by having the programmer "resolve" these locations.
David also asks a good question whether there are just a couple of waits that throw off the totals. A similar but more design-oriented question is whether your app has some little widget that is always tickling SQL Server for an update, 100 users issuing
a one-line query once a second, to fill some tiny counter on the user screen, can have this same kind of effect.
Finally on the perceived app slowness *again* I would ask about design issues, I've seen apps that were very cleverly doing async, background data loads on ten hidden panels while the user gazed at their data. This was very heavily loading the system
for basically no good reason, but it wasn't SQL Server's fault.
Josh

P7N SLi, Very High NB / SB / PCI Express cooler.

I noticed that i have very high temps on my mobo, when i have my finger on the NB / PCI express cooler over 1 sec i i feels like a have in in fire?
This cant be good!
what shall i do?

did you install the right one it has 32 and 64 bits ?? please double check
http://s240.photobucket.com/albums/ff177/kourosh22/?action=view&current=ScreenShot041-1.jpg
mine is ok

GNB Max temps and worries

Okies, I have a question / problem... maybe?
My MB, after being turned off for 30 minutes, on bootup, going DIRECTLY into the Bios, shows, under PC Health, a temp of 51C and climbs to 57..varying to..58.
Now I have the 3.06 GHZ Intel chip.
(No, I really don't care about anyone else's temp if they are overclocking or using something like a 2.4)
No overclocking anything.
Bios 2.2 and I did as Asaaf suggested and changed the thingys to 134 and 1.525.
I have an Alpha PAL8942 - which is supposed to be a decent heatsink on the P4.
IS THIS NORMAL / USUAL or not? If not, then should I take the sink off and re-apply the Artic Silver and try for "better"?
Oh, and MB temp is at 41C. - But I didn't mess with tha because the fan came on the MB attached.
Thank you in advance for your response.

Quote
Originally posted by scorpes
I have a p4 3,06 ghz with standaard P4 cooler and GNB MAX with a total of 6 fans and my normal cpu temp is: 54c and system temp is 35c, and mine cpufan speed is around 3700 rpm (says pcalert)
but if i play a game such as unreal 2003, my cpu is getting very hot: between 80c/85c and my vcore is 1,4
AND MSI SAYS IT'S NORMAL THAT THE TEMPERATURE IS THIS HIGH?
(http://www.msi.com.tw/program/e_service/forum/viewindex.php?threadid=13840&boardid=10&styleid=1)
MSI GNB MAX (ms-6565) motherboard
P4 3,06 ghz processor with standaard p4 cooler
1024 mb DDR 266 mhz (dual) memory
Geforce 4 mx videocard
60Gb Maxtor ATA133 HD
Promedium Mars case with a total of 6 fans
I have had the same problems. The cpu temperature was about 52c when the using was idle.
When the using was more then 80% the temperature was rising in some secons over the 75c.,after replace the cooler there where no more problems. He was not realy good placed on the cpu
Now the temperature is between 46c and 52c.
MSI GNB MAX (ms-6565) motherboard
P4 3,06 ghz processor with standaard p4 cooler
2x512 mb DDR 266 mhz (dual) memory
MSIGeforce 4 ti4800SE
80Gb Maxtor ATA133 HD
60Gb Seagate Baracuda ATA100

Very high latency on my MBP 3,1 (mid 2007) with airport extreme card 0x168C

Hi
I wanted to let you know that i filled a bug report concerning a problem involving a MacBookPro3,1 and my airport extreme card (AirPort Extreme (0x168C, 0x87) Firmware Version 1.4.16.2)
If you've got any feedback, please feel free to share it with me.
Here's the bug report:
Hello
I'm experiencing very high latency on my MBP when connected using Wi-Fi in my living room and I believe this is a software bug.
This is the trace of my ping test to my router (5m from me):
macbookpro:~ laurent$ ping 192.168.0.254
PING 192.168.0.254 (192.168.0.254): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1536.229 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=536.642 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3444.466 ms (DUP!)
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=2547.260 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=2671.552 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=1671.272 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=2619.991 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=1619.350 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=2362.474 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=1362.662 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=363.461 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=1407.557 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1020.437 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.254: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=119.570 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.254 ping statistics ---
14 packets transmitted, 13 packets received, +1 duplicates, 7% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 119.570/1663.066/3444.466/937.468 ms
These are the details of my network when alt clicking on the network icon:
ca:69:50:37:c7:b2
Channel: 5
RSSI: -54
Transmit Rate: 54
I'm using Channel 5 where my router is the only device available (checked with iStumbler and KissMac).
I compared these results with another computer sitting at the same place:
This is the trace of my ping test to my router using a PC laptop:
C:\Documents and Settings\Laurent>ping -t 192.168.0.254
Envoi d'une requête 'ping' sur 192.168.0.254 avec 32 octets de données :
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=2 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=3 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=6 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=8 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=4 ms TTL=64
Réponse de 192.168.0.254 : octets=32 temps=1 ms TTL=64
Statistiques Ping pour 192.168.0.254:
Paquets : envoyés = 16, reçus = 16, perdus = 0 (perte 0%),
Durée approximative des boucles en millisecondes :
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 8ms, Moyenne = 3ms
(PC: Win XP SP3 with Linksys Wi-Fi card)
Obviously, my Mac has very high latency where my PC works as expected.
I tried resetting the PRAM, but i didn't affect my results.
I tried updating Airport with the latest AirPort Client Update (http://support.apple.com/downloads/AirPortClient_Update_for_MacBook_and_MacBookPro), but my hardware wasn't eligible for that update (Mid 2007 MacBookPro).
I believe this isn't a hardware bug because i get acceptable ping results when next to my router or in other rooms of my flat.
Can you help me with that bug ?
Regards,
Laurent
Hardware Overview:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
Model Identifier: MacBookPro3,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2.2 GHz
Number Of Processors: 1
Total Number Of Cores: 2
L2 Cache: 4 MB
Memory: 2 GB
Bus Speed: 800 MHz
Boot ROM Version: MBP31.0070.B07
SMC Version (system): 1.16f11
Serial Number (system): W874551DX91
Hardware UUID: 00000000-0000-1000-8000-001B63B19195
Sudden Motion Sensor:
State: Enabled
AirPort:
Type: AirPort
Hardware: AirPort
BSD Device Name: en1
IPv4 Addresses: 192.168.0.2
IPv4:
Addresses: 192.168.0.2
Configuration Method: DHCP
Interface Name: en1
NetworkSignature: IPv4.Router=192.168.0.254;IPv4.RouterHardwareAddress=00:07:cb:3e:04:ef
Router: 192.168.0.254
Subnet Masks: 255.255.255.0
DNS:
Server Addresses: 212.27.40.241, 212.27.40.240
DHCP Server Responses:
Domain Name Servers: 212.27.40.241,212.27.40.240
Lease Duration (seconds): 0
DHCP Message Type: 0x05
Routers: 192.168.0.254
Server Identifier: 192.168.0.254
Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0
Proxies:
Exceptions List: *.local, 169.254/16
FTP Passive Mode: Yes
Ethernet:
MAC Address: 00:1e:52:72:05:2c
Media Options:
Media Subtype: Auto Select
AirPort Card Information:
Wireless Card Type: AirPort Extreme (0x168C, 0x87)
Wireless Card Locale: Worldwide
Wireless Card Firmware Version: 1.4.16.2
Current Wireless Network: kalamar
Wireless Channel: 5

Ok, I must have jinxed myself.
High latency with my Negear WPN824v3. As previously mentioned, the other wireless computers connect fine. Latency remains regardless of the power connected or not.
Please advise.
PING 192.168.0.1 (192.168.0.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=11.607 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=7280.106 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=9209.019 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=8237.475 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=7262.603 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=4313.763 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=3336.361 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=10 ttl=64 time=2339.579 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=11 ttl=64 time=1344.110 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=12 ttl=64 time=345.132 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=13 ttl=64 time=1191.119 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=14 ttl=64 time=3969.730 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=15 ttl=64 time=3992.111 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=16 ttl=64 time=3692.648 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=17 ttl=64 time=2927.634 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=18 ttl=64 time=2130.216 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=19 ttl=64 time=1437.424 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=20 ttl=64 time=2385.203 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=21 ttl=64 time=1393.622 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=22 ttl=64 time=396.783 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=23 ttl=64 time=1.295 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=24 ttl=64 time=115.793 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=25 ttl=64 time=3.137 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=26 ttl=64 time=10.240 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=27 ttl=64 time=2.709 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=28 ttl=64 time=9.958 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=29 ttl=64 time=1818.371 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=30 ttl=64 time=1470.613 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=31 ttl=64 time=472.520 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=32 ttl=64 time=2255.417 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=33 ttl=64 time=18198.039 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=34 ttl=64 time=23288.761 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=35 ttl=64 time=25150.840 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.0.1: icmp_seq=36 ttl=64 time=26813.832 ms
^C
--- 192.168.0.1 ping statistics ---
63 packets transmitted, 34 packets received, 46% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 1.295/4906.111/26813.832/7241.136 ms

Very high cpu utilization with mq broker

Hi all,
I see a very high cpu utilization (400% on 8 cpu server) when I connect consumers to OpenQ. It increase close to 100% for every consumer I add. Slowly, the consumer comes to a halt, as the producers are sending messages at a good rate too.
Environment Setup
Glassfish version 2.1
com.sun.messaging.jmq Version Information Product Compatibility Version: 4.3 Protocol Version: 4.3 Target JMS API Version: 1.1
Cluster set up using persistent storage. snippet from broker log.
Java Runtime: 1.6.0_14 Sun Microsystems Inc. /home/user/foundation/jdk-1.6/jre [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] IMQ_HOME=/home/user/foundation/sges/imq [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] IMQ_VARHOME=/home/user/foundation/installation/node-agent-server1/server1/imq [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] Linux 2.6.18-164.10.1.el5xen i386 server1 (8 cpu) user [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] Java Heap Size: max=394432k, current=193920k [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] Arguments: -javahome /home/user/foundation/jdk-1.6 -Dimq.autocreate.queue=false -Dimq.autocreate.topic=false -Dimq.cluster.masterbroker=mq://server1:37676/ -Dimq.cluster.brokerlist=mq://server1:37676/,mq://server2:37676/ -Dimq.cluster.nowaitForMasterBroker=true -varhome /home/user/foundation/installation/node-agent-server1/server1/imq -startRmiRegistry -rmiRegistryPort 37776 -Dimq.imqcmd.user=admin -passfile /tmp/asmq5711749746025968663.tmp -save -name clusterservercom -port 37676 -bgnd -silent [06/Apr/2011:12:48:44 EDT] [B1004]: Starting the portmapper service using tcp [ 37676, 50, * ] with min threads 1 and max threads of 1 [06/Apr/2011:12:48:45 EDT] [B1060]: Loading persistent data...
I followed step in http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=4884 to narrow it down to Threads that was causing high cpu. Both were around 94%.
Following is the stack for those threads.
"Thread-jms[224]" prio=10 tid=0xd635f400 nid=0x5665 runnable [0xd18fe000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.TransactionList.isConsumedInTransaction(TransactionList.java:697) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:918) - locked <0xf3d35730> (a java.util.Collections$SynchronizedMap) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:810) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.destroyConsumer(ConsumerHandler.java:577) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.handle(ConsumerHandler.java:422) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.PacketRouter.handleMessage(PacketRouter.java:181) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.readData(IMQIPConnection.java:1489) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.process(IMQIPConnection.java:644) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.OperationRunnable.process(OperationRunnable.java:170) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.util.pool.BasicRunnable.run(BasicRunnable.java:493) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None
"Thread-jms[214]" prio=10 tid=0xd56c8000 nid=0x566c waiting for monitor entry [0xd2838000] java.lang.Thread.State: BLOCKED (on object monitor) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.TransactionInformation.isConsumedMessage(TransactionList.java:2544) - locked <0xdbeeb538> (a com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.TransactionInformation) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.TransactionList.isConsumedInTransaction(TransactionList.java:697) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:918) - locked <0xe4c9abf0> (a java.util.Collections$SynchronizedMap) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:810) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.destroyConsumer(ConsumerHandler.java:577) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.handle(ConsumerHandler.java:422) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.PacketRouter.handleMessage(PacketRouter.java:181) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.readData(IMQIPConnection.java:1489) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.process(IMQIPConnection.java:644) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.OperationRunnable.process(OperationRunnable.java:170) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.util.pool.BasicRunnable.run(BasicRunnable.java:493) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None
"Thread-jms[213]" prio=10 tid=0xd65be800 nid=0x5670 runnable [0xd1a28000] java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.TransactionList.isConsumedInTransaction(TransactionList.java:697) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:918) - locked <0xe4c4bad8> (a java.util.Collections$SynchronizedMap) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.core.Session.detatchConsumer(Session.java:810) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.destroyConsumer(ConsumerHandler.java:577) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.handlers.ConsumerHandler.handle(ConsumerHandler.java:422) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.data.PacketRouter.handleMessage(PacketRouter.java:181) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.readData(IMQIPConnection.java:1489) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.IMQIPConnection.process(IMQIPConnection.java:644) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.service.imq.OperationRunnable.process(OperationRunnable.java:170) at com.sun.messaging.jmq.jmsserver.util.pool.BasicRunnable.run(BasicRunnable.java:493) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Locked ownable synchronizers: - None
Any ideas will be appreciated.
--

Thanks ak, for the response.
Yes, the messages are consumed in transactions. I set imq.txn.reapLimit=200 in Start Arguments in jvm configuration.
I verified that it is being set in the log.txt file for the broker:
-Dimq.autocreate.queue=false -Dimq.autocreate.topic=false -Dimq.txn.reapLimit=250
It did not make any difference. Do I need to set this property somewhere else ?
As far as upgrading MQ is concerned, I am using glassfish 2.1. And I think MQ 4.3 is packaged with it. Can you suggest a safe way to upgrade to OpenMQ 4.5 in a running environment. I can bring down the cluster temporarily. Can I just change the jar file somwhere to use MQ4.5 ?
Here is the snippet of the consumer code :
I create Connection in @postConstruct and close it in @preDestroy, so that I don't have to do it everytime.
private ResultMessage[] doRetrieve(String username, String password, String jndiDestination, String filter, int maxMessages, long timeout, RetrieveType type)
throws InvalidCredentialsException, InvalidFilterException, ConsumerException {
// Resources
Session session = null;
try {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Creating transacted session with JMS broker.");
session = connection.createSession(true, Session.SESSION_TRANSACTED);
// Locate bound destination and create consumer
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Searching for named destination: " + jndiDestination);
Destination destination = (Destination) ic.lookup(jndiDestination);
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Creating consumer for named destination " + jndiDestination);
MessageConsumer consumer = (filter == null || filter.trim().length() == 0) ? session.createConsumer(destination) : session.createConsumer(destination, filter);
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Starting JMS connection.");
connection.start();
// Consume messages
if (log.isDebugEnabled()) log.trace("Creating retrieval containers.");
List<ResultMessage> processedMessages = new ArrayList<ResultMessage>(maxMessages);
BytesMessage jmsMessage = null;
for (int i = 0 ; i < maxMessages ; i++) {
// Attempt message retrieve
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Attempting retrieval: " + i);
switch (type) {
case BLOCKING :
jmsMessage = (BytesMessage) consumer.receive();
break;
case IMMEDIATE :
jmsMessage = (BytesMessage) consumer.receiveNoWait();
break;
case TIMED :
jmsMessage = (BytesMessage) consumer.receive(timeout);
break;
// Process retrieved message
if (jmsMessage != null) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Message retrieved\n" + jmsMessage);
// Extract message
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Extracting result message container from JMS message.");
byte[] extracted = new byte[(int) jmsMessage.getBodyLength()];
jmsMessage.readBytes(extracted);
// Decompress message
if (jmsMessage.propertyExists(COMPRESSED_HEADER) && jmsMessage.getBooleanProperty(COMPRESSED_HEADER)) {
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Decompressing message.");
extracted = decompress(extracted);
// Done processing message
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Message added to retrieval container.");
String signature = jmsMessage.getStringProperty(DIGITAL_SIGNATURE);
processedMessages.add(new ResultMessage(extracted, signature));
} else
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("No message was available.");
// Package return container
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Packing retrieved messages to return.");
ResultMessage[] collectorMessages = new ResultMessage[processedMessages.size()];
for (int i = 0 ; i < collectorMessages.length ; i++)
collectorMessages[i] = processedMessages.get(i);
if (log.isTraceEnabled()) log.trace("Returning " + collectorMessages.length + " messages.");
return collectorMessages;
} catch (NamingException ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Unable to locate named queue: " + jndiDestination, ex);
throw new ConsumerException("Unable to locate named queue: " + jndiDestination, ex);
} catch (InvalidSelectorException ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Invalid filter: " + filter, ex);
throw new InvalidFilterException("Invalid filter: " + filter, ex);
} catch (IOException ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Message decompression failed.", ex);
throw new ConsumerException("Message decompression failed.", ex);
} catch (GeneralSecurityException ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Message decryption failed.", ex);
throw new ConsumerException("Message decryption failed.", ex);
} catch (JMSException ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Unable to consumer messages.", ex);
throw new ConsumerException("Unable to consume messages.", ex);
} catch (Throwable ex) {
sessionContext.setRollbackOnly();
log.error("Unexpected error.", ex);
throw new ConsumerException("Unexpected error.", ex);
} finally {
try {
if (session != null) session.close();
} catch (JMSException ex) {
log.error("Unexpected error.", ex);
Thanks for your help.
Edited by: vineet on Apr 7, 2011 10:06 AM

GNB MAX very hot !!!!

Always my temps have been very high (IDLE:CPU 54Cº,System 41Cº. FULL LOAD: CPU 72Cº, System 48Cº) but the computer have been working very stable always.
I´ve two fans in the case, and the fans in the cpu and in northbridge chipset works fine. When I turn on the computer, quickly I go to the bios and the cpu temp is 45C and It starts to increase. So I think that the temps are wrong and I think that is a bios problem, but the only bios update for my GNBMAX is beta (v2.42b) so I don´t know what can I do.
Any ideas?

I agree ;-))But Keep an eye on it, as you dont want to get too complacent, because you are used to seeing a high number, If 72C is the Norm at Max CPU Utilization, then you know that when you see 78-80C that something is Wrong, but for now get your Temps Idle and Max, and Look at these temps as Normal for Now , But like I said just because the Temp Sensor is Off, Does NOT mean that it is Not Measuring Temps. Make sure that you Watch it for any Craziness, either Up or Down ...And once the New BIOS Rev. Come Available I would Jump on it....And did you Put Your Finger-Hand on the CPU heatsink?...How about the System itself? you said that the sys. temp. is being reported as 41C, why dont you get one off those $9 US For the Regular 1 Probe Thermometer to $19.99US For the Fancy Model, And install it in your PC Case (For Peace of Mind and Cheap) I also saw one for $6 US that has Velcro and you put the tiny wire probe into your Case (As it will fit through a screw hole or seam because it's that slim) and you stic it to the Side, or Front of your Case, and you will Know your system, motherboard (Or tape the Probe to the NB Heasink) and you wont have to worry about Burning up your CPU..............Sean REILLY

Very high temp. with GNB MAX

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for