Very imp vendor evalution

please provide me the relevant configeration settings step by step for vendor evalution.
regards
meena

1. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Weighting Keys
2. SPRO>MM>Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Define Criteria
Price,
Quality,
Delivery,
Service
For each criteria you will have Sub criteria
Criteria Sub-Criteria
3. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation>Define Scope List.
4. SPRO->MM->Purchasing>Vendor Evaluation> Maintain Purchasing Organization Data
5.Run ME61
Note: Follow the below links
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation - Fully Automatic

Hi all,
Could you please answer two queries in Vendor Evaluation.
1. What is use and where we assign scope of list in vendor evaluation
2. I want to take evaluation from Invoice also. Configurations I have done but system is not calculating the score on base of invoice verification.
Regards

Hi
for your first question:
The Vendor Evaluation component helps you select sources of supply and facilitates the continual monitoring of existing supply relationships. It provides you with accurate information on prices, and terms of payment and delivery. By evaluating vendors, you can improve your enterprise's competitiveness.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b97c2d414511d188fc0000e8322f96/content.htm
for your second question
please re check your setting..
very imp vendor evalution
these links will help you.
thanks..

Vendor Evaluation - Issue

Good afternoon!
I need your help to resolve a claim made by the user.
The user uses the 0PUR_C05_Q0003 report. In the same vendor evaluation displayed for a given period.
The user is requesting that vendors are not displayed in R / 3, have the flag for deletion.
I am currently using the DS 0MM_PUR_VE_01.
The DS gets data from tables and ELBP, ELBK. Information for deletion flag is not displayed in these tables.
Could you help me find a solution to the problem?
Thank you very much.
Javier .-

anybody?

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Mapping Ontime delivery requirement in sap vendor evaluation

Hi,
Have below requirement for calculating score for ontime delivery performance.
1. Evaluation will be executed weekly once
2. For the given weekf if18 are on time out of 20 total, then the vendor gets a 90% on time score
Tried mapping this
1. By making std.delivery date variance as 0
2. Maintaining points as below
0 100
99.9 1
but the above settings are not working. With the above settings, system is not even calculating the on-time delivery performance.
with this I realized that maintaining std.delivery date variance(at least 1) is mandatory for SAP.
Can I one guide me how to map above requirement.
Thanks in advance
Hari

Hi,
I have logged similar request before and never got a satisfactory solution. My recommendation is to check the attached link, it details how the scores are calculated with reference to the config you have created. Just rolled out vendor evaluation in my organisation and this document was very useful.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Vendor Evaluation in MM

Hi All
Can u tell me the Detail process of Vendor Evaluation in MM
Regards
Manju

HI,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
You can also refer http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b97e4f414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

MM Vendor Evaluation Score Card Program RM06LBAT

Hello MM gurus,
I am trying to figure out what record selection criteria SAP uses in calculating a score in the Vendor Evaluation score card program RM06LBAT. We have our applicability period set to 090 days in configuration. Does the program look at records in S013 for the last 090 days from the run date of RM06LBAT? Or does the program look at records in S013 since the last vendor score card was generated? Is applicability period used in running the score card? How is the applicability period used in SAP for vendor evaluation?
We would like to run the score card program every 090 days (or once per quarter) and have SAP only evaluate scores for activity generated over the 090 day period.
I appreciate your assistance.
Regards,
Julie

HI,
The information you need from vendor evaluation is contained in the criteria on-time delivery.
The market price is a dat you introduce in the info record.
There is a very good information in the online help:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cde414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Vendor Evaluation implementation

Dear Buddies
This has reference to the subject matter, we needs to implement the Vendor Evaluation in SAP, being an Audit Requirement.
We needs to fix the following parameters for the same:
"QUOTE"
CRITERIA FOR VENDOR RATING
                    W1xQr + W2xDr + W3xSr + W4xAr
Vendor Rating (VRML) =     -
                              100
     Where      Rating          Weightage          To be rated by
     Quality (Qr)          W1 = 50          Unit Mat Deptt/ Stores
     Delivery (Dr)          W2 = 30          Unit Mat Deptt/Stores
     Service (Sr)          W3 = 10          Purchase Department
     Adaptability (Ar)          W4 = 10          Purchase Department
     1)      QUALITY RATING (Qr)      =     (Q1 + Q2 x 0.8 + Q3 x 0.5 + Q4 x 0)
                                             Q
          Where   Q =      Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4
               Q1 =     Quantity Accepted
               Q2 =     Quantity accepted with Deviation (Demerit Factor = 0.8)
               Q3 =     Quantity accepted after rework (Demerit Factor = 0.5)
               Q4 =     Quantity Rejected
     2)     DELIVERY RATING (Dr)      =      Q1 x 100
                                         Q
          Where   Q =      Total consignments delivered
                          Q1 =     Consignments delivered in Time
3)     SERVICE RATING (Sr)
           To be given on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the Very Good Service,
           Response Time, both Pre- Sales and After-Sales. e.g. 7 point = 70%).
4)     ADAPTABILITY TO CHANGES & IMPROVEMENT (Ar)
           To be given on a scale of 1 to 10 (10 being the Proactive in Improving the      Product &   Service, Very much Adaptable to Changes. e.g. 7 point = 70%).
VENDOR RATING GRADES
          A     100 u2013 80 %
          B     79 u2013 70 %
          C     69 u2013 60 %
          D     < 60 %
I just aware where we can do the configurations. But not understanding how to put the scores, weight ?

Dear Friends
Can you explain how to calculate this things thro VE implementation ? Where i can mention in configurations to calculate the these ratings?
QUALITY RATING (Qr)      =     (Q1 + Q2 x 0.8 + Q3 x 0.5 + Q4 x 0)/ Q
Where   Q =      Q1 + Q2 + Q3 + Q4
               Q1 =     Quantity Accepted
               Q2 =     Quantity accepted with Deviation (Demerit Factor = 0.8)
               Q3 =     Quantity accepted after rework (Demerit Factor = 0.5)
               Q4 =     Quantity Rejected
DELIVERY RATING (Dr)      =      Q1 x 100 /    Q
          Where   Q =      Total consignments delivered
                          Q1 =     Consignments delivered in Time
There after only I can do the these ratings weighing %. Please help me out

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation Automatically

Dear all
        Kindly sent the related Document both configuration & end user details for Vendor evaluation.
Urgent Please.

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing:
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
regards,
sasi

Vendor Evaluation Score ...???

Hi MM Gurus,
My client requires score calculationfor the vendor evaluation i.e., it has to show the working how it has arrived at the final score, to be clear systems works automatically and displays the final score based on certain main and sub criteria that working has to be shown in a table format
and what is mean by Market Price.. where can i get this in Vendor Evaluation.
Thanks in Advance,
Anthyodaya.

HI,
The information you need from vendor evaluation is contained in the criteria on-time delivery.
The market price is a dat you introduce in the info record.
There is a very good information in the online help:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/EN/8d/b97cde414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Vendor Evaluation - Help Needed

Hello,
We do not have any errors for the vendor evaluation as we are yet to develop the model.
We are trying to get the Automatic scores for Pricing, Quality, Delivery and invoices from ECC to BW.
At the same time we want to use a Web Survey for additional scoring based on Plant
We are not able to find the data sources that can bring the automatic scores especially for Pricing into BW. Also integrating the Web survey scores with the Automatic scoring is not very clear from the configuration documents from SAP. Can you please give me the appropriate information and/or SAP notes pertaining to this development.
Thank you so very much,
Lynda

Hope it is a program BBPUPDVD and take help from technical resource and massage this program as you expected and schedule it.
I have multiple user IDs on SCN, is it possible to consolidate my IDs and my points?
Yes it is possible. You need to decide which user ID you want to keep, then send an email to [email protected], provide the user ID and ask for the consolidation to be done.
Your blog and forum contributions will all be moved to your single user ID and the points will be consolidated. For the wiki, your points will be brought to your unique user ID but unfortunately, we don't have the ability to move your Wiki contributions to another user ID at this time.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/crphelp

Automatic Evaluation Data (Vendor Evaluation)

Hi Experts,
We have defined vendor evaluation in such a way. Price, Quality & Delivery - Automatic Evaluation and Service - Manually Entered. When we do Automatic evaluation thru T-Code ME61, Score of price, quality and delivery appears in the system. How can we see the backend data from which these scores derives. So that we can explain user, that the scores have come due to following data / calculation done by system in background.
Can anybody help me. Full points to helping answers.
Regards
GR

Hi GR,
In Help documentation you have the details how each score is getting calculated. We can use this documentation to explain to the client. Also you can take the help of OSS notes.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Regarding to know how the system arrived at that score, is very difficult as it calculates the score by taking all the trasactions happend for that period. And no where in the system it shows how it calculated per transaction-wise.
But if you are so determined, note down the previous score for the vendor, then do one transaction ( PO and GR). Manually Claculate the for one perticular criteria score as defined in the Help documentation. Then run the evaluation and cross check your manually calculated score to the new score.
Hope this helps you in answering your query,
With Regards,
Krishna

Vendor evaluation periods

Hi,
In vendor evaluation, How system calculates from and To date?
Example, Vendor is evaluated yearly twice such as september and March Months.
First evaluation happened in the september,on that time system takes current date.Next evaluation happened in March month on that time system takes current date .Here current date means TO date ,
Hence any Validation should be between the periods only.
but which date system consider the From date?
Thanks in advance.
Kumar.

Hi,
Perhaps my answer was not very clear, but the months I chose were just an example.
What I try to explain is that you cannot set a "from" period in vendor evaluation. An evaluation covers all data that exists for the vendor, this is because it is important to get an accurate score. To select when the evaluation was to start from would have a negative effect on the score for the vendor.
What you can do is search for vendors not evaluated since (ME6D) and enter a date yourself or before you carry out your evaluations download all the scores to a spreadsheet to record the improvement.
Where Date Evaluation created = ELBK - LEBDT and overall score = ELBK - GESBU.
The document below is excellent to understand whole process.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Thanks.

Vendor evaluation points automatic criteria

Hi
How the percencetage & points are determined for automatic criteria.
Regards
Umapathy

hi,
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Go to SPRO --> Materials management --> Purchasing -
> vendor evaluation
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion Key 01 Key 02
Price 1 5
Quality 1 5
Delivery 1 2
Gen. service/support 1 1
Ext. service provision 1 2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders
Regards,
Manish

Very imp vendor evalution

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for