Very poor performance Windows RT with Citrix

Hi All,
I'm currently in a project with a customer implementing XenApp 7.6. The customer uses Dell XPS 10 tablets with Windows RT installed. We have installed the latest Receiver from the Microsoft Store and added a connection through a Citrix NetScaler Gateway
VPX version 10.5.
The user experience on the tablet is very very poor. This is extreme when browsing using Internet Explorer 11. On a normal Windows 8 client or a thin client with WES2009 the experience is good.
Besides the bad performance there's also a problem with the home/start button on the remote OS (Windows Server 2012 R2). The button isn't working or only after multiple tries.
This experience is also on a windows 8.1/10 machine with the Citrix Receiver from the store.
Any thoughts about the issue's above? What can we do to optimize the environment for working with the Citrix Receiver from the store?
Kind Regards,
René
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights. Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question.
Click on "vote as Helpful" if you feel this post helpful to you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

I would recommend turning to Citrix to get support on this. After all it's their product!
MCP/MCSA/MCTS/MCITP

Similar Messages

MSI GE70 2OE-015NL very poor performance on battery power

Hey guys,
First of all I want to say that I'm really happy with my GE70 notebook. Everything works perfectly fine except for this one thing... When I play games on the notebook while on battery power, the performance is very poor. For example when I normally on AC power get around 250 FPS, it drops down all the way to around 40-60 FPS on battery power. In real demanding games this can be very annoying, since I have to play on AC power constantly for games like Battlefield 4. Although this isn't really a problem for me most of the time, I just don't think that's the concept of a notebook... I monitored some statistics using MSI Afterburner and I noticed that the GPU's core clock is clocked all the way down to a constant 135MHz whilst gaming and the memory is clocked all the way down to around 400MHz. I'm using a GTX 765M. I've already tried changing settings in the Windows power settings, the NVIDIA control panel and I even looked into the BIOS, but I couldn't find a solution to this problem. Apparently the GTX 700M series GPUs support Optimus technology which should give a decent battery life using the full power of your GPU, but for me it doesn't do so. The battery gets drained in around 45 minutes while gaming on very poor performance. I hope you guys can help me out!

Oyo,
All Gamer NB are not done for play in battery mode, battery life are short and the power provide by a battery are far from the power adapter, this mean the NB get less power and your CPU and VGA are working in lower mode = lower result.
This is normal because link to the battery, thepower adapter provide 120W, the battery 49W, you see the gap between them ^^
So for play games, use the power adapter and the battery together, this is the best way.

URGENT: Migrating from SQL to Oracle results in very poor performance!

*** IMPORTANT, NEED YOUR HELP ***
Dear, I have a banking business solution from Windows/SQL Server 2000 to Sun Solaris/ORACLE 10g migrated. In the test environment everything was working fine. On the production system we have very poor DB performance. About 100 times slower than SQL Server 2000!
Environment at Customer Server Side:
Hardware: SUN Fire 4 CPU's, OS: Solaris 5.8, DB Oracle 8 and 10
Data Storage: Em2
DB access thru OCCI [Environment:OBJECT, Connection Pool, Create Connection]
Depending from older applications it's necessary to run ORACLE 8 as well on the same Server. Since we have running the new solution, which is using ORACLE 10, the listener for ORACLE 8 is frequently gone (or by someone killed?). The performance of the whole ORACLE 10 Environment is very poor. As a result of my analyse I figured out that the process to create a connection to the connection pool takes up to 14 seconds. Now I am wondering if it a problem to run different ORACLE versions on the same Server? The Customer has installed/created the new ORACLE 10 DB with the same user account (oracle) as the older version. To run the new solution we have to change the ORACLE environment settings manually. All hints/suggestions to solve this problem are welcome. Thanks in advance.
Anton

On the production system we have very poor DB performanceHave you identified the cause of the poor performance is not the queries and their plans being generated by the database?
Do you know if some of the queries appear to take more time than what it used to be on old system? Did you analyze such queries to see what might be the problem?
Are you running RBO or CBO?
if stats are generated, how are they generated and how often?
Did you see what autotrace and tkprof has to tell you about problem queries (if in fact such queries have been identified)?
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10752/sqltrace.htm#1052

Poor Performance of Safari with YouTube

Recently I have noticed really poor performance of Safari when I try to watch videoes on YouTube.
I have experienced this both with my 2009 iMac desktop and my brand new MacBook Pro w/ Retina Display.
This can't be a network problem because I pay Verizon way too much money every month for their FiOS Quantum service and various speedtests that I run look OK.
Is the problem with Safari or what?

You guys are not following me. And, I'm not sure if I used that term right. I was talking about answers you see from google searches, not from people here. I am a 40 year old business owner not a kid. What I meant by "fanboy" is that a lot of times when you search online for something like "Itunes on my PC is not seeing my ipod", you see the most popular answer is "Buy a mac". Yes it may be funny, but it is not really helpful. That is the type of person I was referring to, and I was not talking about people here. People on this discussion board seem to be very helpful. I own macs and PC's, so don't like the answer "get a mac". I have one (three in fact), but I also have PC's. I love my mac computers, my iPhone, my iPad, my AppleTV and all of that just like you guys probably do.
I still think it is an interesting and strange issue. If you contacted the IE folks, they would say "Are you having this problem on all websites?". As soon as you said "No, just this one". They would say "It must be the way the website is written". If you talk to someone here, the answer might lean towards "If it runs fine on Safari, but not on IE, it must be an IE issue".
I was just thinking it was an interesting enough scenario that someone had looked into it. Sorry if I was misunderstood and riled someone up.
Message was edited by: Austin Rob

Very poor performance on oracle linux 6.3 on virtual-box 4.2

Dear all,
I installed an oracle linux 6.3 on vbox VM (2 gb RAM, 20 gb disk): the installation took a long time and after, I faced poor performance and big latency.
One bug reported:
WARNING: at kernel/time/clockevents.c:47 clockevent_delta2ns+0x79/0x90()
Hardware name: VirtualBox
Modules linked in:
Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-200.24.1.el6uek.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8106ad1f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
[<ffffffff8106ad7a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[<ffffffff8109d649>] clockevent_delta2ns+0x79/0x90
[<ffffffff819b8427>] calibrate_APIC_clock+0xeb/0x2f6
[<ffffffff819b874c>] setup_boot_APIC_clock+0x59/0x7e
[<ffffffff819b8336>] APIC_init_uniprocessor+0xfc/0x102
[<ffffffff819b60fc>] smp_sanity_check+0x69/0x145
[<ffffffff819b62fd>] native_smp_prepare_cpus+0x125/0x215
[<ffffffff819a776b>] kernel_init+0x1c9/0x2a8
[<ffffffff8150edc4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[<ffffffff819a75a2>] ? parse_early_options+0x20/0x20
[<ffffffff8150edc0>] ? gs_change+0x13/0x13
I upgraded memory to 4 gb RAM but it was on vain
Please, any idea so far ?
Best Regards

I can confirm that there is no issue with Virtualbox 4.2 and Oracle Linux 6.3. I use it all the time. Performance should be near native and some aspects like disk I/O may even be faster. Your problem could be insufficient hardware, like missing x86_64 or hardware virtualization support. However, like rukbat wrote, this is not the right forum to discuss Virtualbox and your computer hardware here. I suggest to start with the Virtualbox documentation to verify your hardware is sufficient.
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch10.html#hwvirt
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch14.html

Macbook (mid 2012, 9,2) has very poor performance since the day I bought it (less than 2 months ago)

Problem description:
My macbook is extremely slow since the day I bought it (which was less than 2 months ago)…Came preinstalled with Mavericks and 4GB of RAM. Upgraded it to 16GB hoping that would help, but that did very little…then upgraded to Yosemite. That just made it worse. Formatted the whole thing and installed clean Yosemite. Still, every time I right click, I get the rainbow loading icon and it hangs. Every time I open any file, or click any app, it hangs for a few seconds, again with a loading icon. Every time I play a song on iTunes or even VLC for that matter, it stops multiple times, every few seconds. Feels like it’s “buffering” while I’m playing a song off my hard drive. It’s been bothering me for too long now…Any idea what the issue is exactly?
EtreCheck version: 2.0.11 (98)
Report generated 12 November 2014 23:55:47 GMT-3
Hardware Information: ℹ️
MacBook Pro (13-inch, Mid 2012) (Verified)
MacBook Pro - model: MacBookPro9,2
1 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 CPU: 2-core
16 GB RAM Upgradeable
BANK 0/DIMM0
8 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
BANK 1/DIMM0
8 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
Wireless: en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
Video Information: ℹ️
Intel HD Graphics 4000 -
Color LCD 1920 x 1080
LCD TV spdisplays_1080p
System Software: ℹ️
OS X 10.10 (14A389) - Uptime: 2 days 10:0:44
Disk Information: ℹ️
APPLE HDD TOSHIBA MK5065GSXF disk0 : (500.11 GB)
S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted> [Recovery]: 650 MB
Macintosh HD (disk1) / [Startup]: 498.88 GB (374.54 GB free)
Core Storage: disk0s2 499.25 GB Online
MATSHITADVD-R   UJ-8A8
USB Information: ℹ️
SIGMACHIP USB Keyboard
Apple Inc. FaceTime HD Camera (Built-in)
Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
Apple Inc. Apple Internal Keyboard / Trackpad
Apple Computer, Inc. IR Receiver
Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
Configuration files: ℹ️
/etc/hosts - Count: 6
Gatekeeper: ℹ️
Anywhere
Kernel Extensions: ℹ️
/Library/Application Support/VirtualBox
[loaded] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxDrv (4.3.18) Support
[loaded] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxNetAdp (4.3.18) Support
[loaded] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxNetFlt (4.3.18) Support
[loaded] org.virtualbox.kext.VBoxUSB (4.3.18) Support
Startup Items: ℹ️
TuxeraNTFSUnmountHelper: Path: /Library/StartupItems/TuxeraNTFSUnmountHelper
Startup items are obsolete and will not work in future versions of OS X
Launch Agents: ℹ️
[not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
[running] com.teamviewer.teamviewer.plist Support
[running] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_desktop.plist Support
Launch Daemons: ℹ️
[loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2.Agent.plist Support
[loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
[loaded] com.teamviewer.Helper.plist Support
[running] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_service.plist Support
[not loaded] org.virtualbox.startup.plist Support
User Launch Agents: ℹ️
[loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
[loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
[loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.diskSpaceWatcher.plist Support
[loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.scheduledScan.plist Support
[loaded] com.macpaw.CleanMyMac2Helper.trashWatcher.plist Support
[not loaded] org.virtualbox.vboxwebsrv.plist Support
User Login Items: ℹ️
iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
Dropbox Application (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.5 - SDK 10.6 Support
AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 1.0.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
Tuxera NTFS Support
Time Machine: ℹ️
Time Machine not configured!
Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
      20% mds
      6% Google Chrome
      4% WindowServer
      1% hidd
      0% Dropbox
Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
481 MB Coda 2
258 MB Google Chrome
189 MB softwareupdated
189 MB loginwindow
189 MB Finder
Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
5.71 GB Free RAM
7.22 GB Active RAM
2.63 GB Inactive RAM
1.62 GB Wired RAM
25.24 GB Page-ins
0 B Page-outs

If it has been slow since it came out of the box, it's probably defective. The warranty entitles you to complimentary phone support for the first 90 days of ownership.

Poor Performance generating pdf with Disco Viewer

Version: 10.1.2.54.25
Please humour me, I’m not a Discoverer friendly person.
Never even seen it.
But I am supporting a client who brings me Discoverer problems in the third person...
So issue is...
They often generate large reports.
Sometime, the users will export (not sure if that is correct term or not) them to pdf format.
This part of the process takes a while.
A 10,000 line/row report can take 25 minutes to generate in pdf.
Users are finding this unacceptable.
Excel generation for a similar report is done in approx 1.5 minutes.
Sorry, I can find nothing at Oracle sites, and a few things using google.
I can see that there are some client level controls in Disco that allows you to control resolution, memory, etc for pdf generation.
So..
1.     What exactly are all the related setting and what do these settings control.
2.     Are there any known issues for this?
3.     How is the pdf generated, this client process or server ? How can I describe this process to my client so that it can justify the difference between pdf & excel (assuming there is no known issue).
4.     Any good documents dealing with this (please don’t point me to user guides)
5. any other ideas, thoughts ?

Hi
Well if the same issue occurs in both Desktop and Viewer then you have your answer. It's not the way that Discoverer is running the workbook its the way the workbook has been constructed.
For a start, 40000 rows for a Crosstab is way over the top and WILL cause performance issues. This is because Discoverer has to create a bucket for every data point for every combination of items on the page, side and top axes. The more rows, page items and column headings that you have, the more buckets you have and therefore the longer it will take for Discoverer to work out the contents of every bucket.
Also, whenever you use page items or crosstabs, Discoverer has to retrieve all of the rows for the entire query, not just the first x rows as with a table. This is because it cannot possibly know how many buckets to create until it has all the rows.
You therefore to:
a) apply sufficient filters to reduce the amount of data being returned to something manageable
b) reduce the number of page items, if used
c) reduce the number of items on the side or top axis of a crosstab
d) reduce the number of complex calculations, especially calculations that would generate a new bucket
If you have a lot of complex calculations, you should consider the use of a materialized view / summary folder to pre-calculate the values.
Does this help?
Best wishes
Michael Armstrong-Smith
URL: http://learndiscoverer.com
Blog: http://learndiscoverer.blogspot.com

Poor/slow window load with 8mb of ram and A7 chip ***

A new Macbook pro with all the trimmings and its slower then my old dilapatated h/p ***.

i just wonder why this so. i check my networking and cpu usage and it seems fine but then while on line my windows either wont completely load or some other silly glitch and its odd for suck a new and equipped laptop. am i missing something or should i take it in to have some one give it a once over.

MOVED: K8MM3-V win2000 very poor performance

This topic has been moved to AMD64 ATI/SiS/VIA based board.
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=105470.0

I've tried:
original install of win2000: problems as above
Fresh install of win2000 no service packs: same problems
Fresh isntall of win2000 with lastest drivers from MSI website: same problems
Fresh install of win2000 with service pack 4 (latest): same problems
Fresh install of winXP: No problems at all
As above but with latest MSI drivers: Still no problems at all
It's definitely related to win2000 and I suspect it must be a mobo driver issue?

One specific MSAD account having very poor performance

We have one specific MSAD EPM account that takes forever to login, access a planning form and run a report. If this same user uses our testing native directory IDs he session is as fast as all other MSAD accounts.
If another MSAD account uses his workstation they encounter no problems (thus not a workstation problem)
We have dropped and added him back to the security groups, refreshed filters and reviewed his MSAD setup to make sure it is not different.
Looking for other avenues or tools to use to determine why this individual is having problems.
JTS

Had to share this will all,
Finally figured out what the problem was after sniffing through our entire network. It was a workspace preference for Accessibility Mode. For this user it was checked (File/Preferences/General/Accessibility Mode)
Once unchecked the system speed was normal to other users
Always the little things
JTS

Poor Performance with 10.1

I'm on a windows xp sp 3 machine with an x800 xt pe graphics card using the latest catalyst drivers from Ati. Ever since I updated flash, I'm getting very poor performance during 720p with acceleration enabled. I'm also getting bad performance when it's disabled. Is there an issue with the 10.2 legacy (ati) drivers not enabling hardware acceleration with 10.1 flash?
BTW I went back to using 10.0.42.34 flash and everything is running fine again.

I've also noticed poor performance since installing the 10.1 plugin. Not just in HD video etc, but in general use. So much for "improved performance"...
No idea on solutions at this stage - In the process of downgrading to previous version to see if that fixes my problems

CS4 poor dialog window performance with huge screen dual 30 inch

Hi, I am running dual 30 inch monitors each one at 2560x1600 resolution, on windows xp sp3 on an nvidia quadro FX 3700M (dell precision M6400 laptop)
If I use CS4 from the single laptop screen, everything is fine. However, whenever Im on the huge dual screen desktop any dialog box activity has a very poor performance. For example, I select File>New and the dialog window takes some two to three seconds to draw on the screen... it might not seem like a big problem but it is very very annoying since I am used to the snappy response of the user interface from years of PS use. It really affects my workflow since I work with many files at the same time.
Also, the bigger the dialog window the slower it takes to appear. If I select File > Save for Web and Devices, that dialog window will take up to five seconds to appear on the screen.
The problem seems to get worse the longer the OS has been working, ie. if the PC is freshly booted the problem seems a bit lighter. So it might be related to video card memory or something.
Here's what I have tried so far to solve this:
Since what I'm using is a laptop, the driver choices are limited, however I've been able to force install the 181.20 version of the nvidia driver, but it made no difference. All the official driver versions (176 series) from Dell also have the problem.
The problem doesn't seem related to Photoshop's use of the GPU as the problem remains while the GPU acceleration disabled.
This problem is also present in PS CS3 as well as CS2 CS1 and version 7 which are all I am able to test.
I was able to reproduce this problem on a desktop computer with the same setup on an nvidia quadro FX 5500 card. The dialog box window performance is really terrible.
I did not notice this problem in any other application that spans the two screens, even high end 3d ones.
Ok well it seems from my testing that Photoshop is simply bogged down by having such a huge desktop area to work with. It is really disappointing since PS was my only reason to spend so much money on this dual 30 inch screen setup.
Has anyone else noticed this? Are there any other suggestions? Any adobe support on this?
Thank you

I have tried with both open gl enabled and disabled (edit > preferences > performance)
The problem is present even in Photoshop version 7, I think that one didnt even notice the presence of a 3d accelerator chip.
Both video cards tested have 1GB of video ram.
Thanks.

Blackberry Link for Q10 with Outlook Sync has very poor performance and not good Functionality

I am wondering if anyone has tested this software. Blackberry Sync software for my previous phones were wonderful. I can sync my contacts and calender in a very short time. With this new Blackberry Link it takes about 1 1/2 hours Plus to complete. And when it does complete - it duplicates entries which I did not want.
Plus what is missing is the following:
1. I am not able to say Update both Device and Outlook any longer. This functionality is gone.
My question: How does it do a two way sync if I only have a choice to use what I have on my phone or on outlook only
I want to be able to update my Outlook contacts with changes and addition I made on my Q10 phone and update my device with changes I made to Outlook.
Why did Blackberry remove this very flexible choice? Plus Blackberry Link has very poor performance.
I work for a large company and I do Enterpirse Software testing daily. Performance is the number one complaint for customers on top of the UI and functionality.

Thanks for the reply.
OS: Windows 8.1 Pro 6.3.9600 Build 9600
Link: 1.2.3.23
BB Desktop: 7.1.0.41
Anti Virus: Avast 140312-0
Firewall: None
A thing I noticed when I opened Descktop Software for the first time since the new Z30 is that the old application thinks it is looking for a Z30. I havent even opened the application since before I got the new device. The only way it could think I have a Z30 is if it is using a lot of the same files as Blackberry Link. That is some pretty terrible software development practices in my opinion. I'm going to take your suggestion and uninstall both apps, run a registry cleaner and reinstall BB Link and I bet it works a lot better afterwards.
EDIT 12 March 2014 7PM EST
Still all of the same errors with regard to syncing outlook contacts and Schedules. I will post all of the error messages I recieve here as I see them. Application is always started by connecting device with USB cable.
"Sync was unseccessful
Caught _com_error exception. Description(): Error in MAPILogonEx: MAPI_E_CALL_FAILED; Error(): -2147467259 (0x80004005); ErrorMessage(): Unspecified error; Source(): XCPCRdmptn.RdRDOSession"
REBOOT
Change to sync contacts only, 1-way sync to computer, always use device data
"Sync was unsuccessful
CPreferencesManager: Configuration Value for /Preferences/Account_1_65537/DevicePin not set in TransConfig.xml for translator RimBB"
REBOOT
Application went through the whole process and hung for about 15 minutes and then completed successfuly syncing contacts only.
Change to callendar only. Sync completed successfuly. No hang or errors. very quick.
A new recurring appointment on the device was not transferred to the computer.
Sync callendar again, completed successfuly.
Appointment is still not transferred to computer.
So far I've spent an hour tonight trying to sync my contacts and appointment changes from just one day. I'm not thrilled.

PCMCIA gigabit cards are poor performance with lenovo n100

Hello,
I have a lenovo n100 and I tried two pcmcia gigabit cards (Dlink DGE 660TD and TRENDnet TEG-PCBUSR) with very poor performance. I tested with iperf (cat6 cable with Siemens Sinergie S300 server) and Windows, linux, normal config, tunned tcp parameters, the outcome is always the same, 200Mbits upload and 76Mbits for download.
Any sugestion?
Kind regards,
André P. Muga

lead_org wrote:
There is two type of PCMCIA, one is running at 16 bit another is running through 32 bit.
You can achieve the gigabit requirements quite comfortably with the 32 bit, but i think the 16 bit version is not going to be enough for the gigabit ethernet.
Running at Mhz??? I don't understand how that is anything to with data bandwidth.
Both are pcmcia2, 32 bits, gigabit ethernet, full duplex, cards.
The peak transfer rate is calculated by <bus speed MHz> * <bus width> = <Mbps>
Example:
Bus speed 33MHz, Bus width: 32bits
33 * 32 = 1056 Mbps or 132MBps
Bus speed 667MHz, Bus width: 32bits
667 * 32 = 21344Mbps or 2668MBps
The lenovo N100 has a 32 bit bus with 667MHz.... no limitation here.

Poor performance with WebI and BW hierarchy drill-down...

Hi
We are currently implementing a large HR solution with BW as backend
and WebI and Xcelcius as frontend. As part of this we are experiencing
very poor performance when doing drill-down in WebI on a BW hierarchy.
In general we are experiencing ok performance during selection of data
and traditional WebI filtering - however when using the BW hierarchy
for navigation within WebI, response times are significantly increasing.
The general solution setup are as follows:
1) Business Content version of the personnel administration
infoprovider - 0PA_C01. The Infoprovider contains 30.000 records
2) Multiprovider to act as semantic Data Mart layer in BW.
3) Bex Query to act as Data Mart Query and metadata exchange for BOE.
All key figure restrictions and calculations are done in this Data Mart
Query.
4) Traditionel BO OLAP universe 1:1 mapped to Bex Data Mart query. No
calculations etc. are done in the universe.
5) WebI report with limited objects included in the WebI query.
As we are aware that performance is an very subjective issues we have
created several case scenarios with different dataset sizes, various
filter criteria's and modeling techniques in BW.
Furthermore we have tried to apply various traditional BW performance
tuning techniques including aggregates, physical partitioning and pre-
calculation - all without any luck (pre-calculation doesn't seem to
work at all as WebI apparently isn't using the BW OLAP cache).
In general the best result we can get is with a completely stripped WebI report without any variables etc.
and a total dataset of 1000 records transferred to WebI. Even in this scenario we can't get
each navigational step (when using drill-down on Organizational Unit
hierarchy - 0ORGUNIT) to perform faster than minimum 15-20 seconds per.
navigational step.
That is each navigational step takes 15-20 seconds
with only 1000 records in the WebI cache when using drill-down on org.
unit hierachy !!.
Running the same Bex query from Bex Analyzer with a full dataset of
30.000 records on lowest level of detail returns a threshold of 1-2
seconds pr. navigational step thus eliminating that this should be a BW
modeling issue.
As our productive scenario obviously involves a far larger dataset as
well as separate data from CATS and PT infoproviders we are very
worried if we will ever be able to utilize hierarchy drill-down from
WebI ?.
The question is as such if there are any known performance issues
related to the use of BW hierarchy drill-down from WebI and if so are
there any ways to get around them ?.
As an alternative we are currently considering changing our reporting
strategy by creating several higher aggregated reports to avoid
hierarchy navigation at all. However we still need to support specific
division and their need to navigate the WebI dataset without
limitations which makes this issue critical.
Hope that you are able to help.
Thanks in advance
/Frank
Edited by: Mads Frank on Feb 1, 2010 9:41 PM

Hi Henry, thank you for your suggestions although i´m not agree with you that 20 seconds is pretty good for that navigation step. The same query executed with BEx Analyzer takes only 1-2 seconds to do the drill down.
Actions
suppress unassigned nodes in RSH1: Magic!! This was the main problem!!
tick use structure elements in RSRT: Done it.
enable query stripping in WebI: Done it.
upgrade your BW to SP09: Has the SP09 some inprovements in relation to this point ?
use more runtime query filters. : Not possible. Very simple query.
Others:
RSRT combination H-1-3-3-1 (Expand nodes/Permanent Cache BLOB)
Uncheck prelimirary Hierarchy presentation in Query. only selected.
Check "Use query drill" in webi properties.
Sorry for this mixed message but when i was answering i tryied what you suggest in relation with supress unassigned nodes and it works perfectly. This is what is cusing the bottleneck!! incredible...
Thanks a lot
J.Casas

Very poor performance Windows RT with Citrix

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for