Very slow create, image is local

All
Installed the VM template for Oracle 10g, seemed successful (using Oracle VM Manager)
Trying to create VM from the template and its really slow. The create has been running for 1/2 hr so far
and the stats below are pretty constant over this period. CPU mostly waiting
This is a HP DL140G3 with dual 5150 and 7Gb ram.
Is this expected behaviour, previous experience with VMWare on the SAME box
was very different (MUCH faster at loading VMs)
2 drives, 147Gb 15K SAS
500Gb SATA
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdb1 3.0G 738M 2.1G 27% /
/dev/sdb2 462G 150G 313G 33% /OVS
/dev/sda1 99M 36M 59M 38% /boot
tmpfs 324M 0 324M 0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda2 133G 192M 126G 1% /opt
top - 21:35:16 up 56 min, 1 user, load average: 1.95, 1.83, 1.65
Tasks: 106 total, 2 running, 102 sleeping, 0 stopped, 2 zombie
Cpu0 : 0.0%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 0.0%id, 99.3%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu1 : 2.0%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 97.4%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu2 : 0.7%us, 0.7%sy, 0.0%ni, 98.6%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Cpu3 : 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 662704k total, 658344k used, 4360k free, 968k buffers
Swap: 1052248k total, 108k used, 1052140k free, 514572k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
6251 root 18 0 18312 8724 1544 D 1 1.3 0:11.66 python
3600 root 15 0 12376 5316 2156 D 0 0.8 0:05.19 python
9758 root 18 0 0 0 0 Z 0 0.0 0:00.01 python <defunct>
1 root 15 0 2044 628 540 S 0 0.1 0:00.32 init
2 root RT 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.04 migration/0
3 root 34 19 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.03 ksoftirqd/0

haven't tried the vm.cfg create yet
[root@oraclevmserver init.d]# ./iptables status
Table: filter
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num target prot opt source destination
1 DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21
2 DROP tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80
3 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)
num target prot opt source destination
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
num target prot opt source destination
Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (1 references)
num target prot opt source destination
1 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
2 ACCEPT icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 icmp type 255
3 ACCEPT esp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
4 ACCEPT ah -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
5 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.251 udp dpt:5353
6 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:631
7 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:631
8 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED
9 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21
10 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22
11 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW udp dpt:53
12 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:53
13 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80
14 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:2049
15 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpts:5900:5950
16 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:8002
17 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:8003
18 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:8899
19 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:7777
20 REJECT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-host-prohibited

Similar Messages

  • Very slow DVD image creation: is there a faster way.

    Hi to everybody.
    I often need to create images from DL DVD2 and each image takes around 45 minutes. All this time for just 7,8Gbytes of datas (using Disk Utility)? Is there a faster software for doing this?
    TIA
    majortom67

    Make sure you set Disk Utility's "Image Format" to "DVD/CD master", not "compressed". (Video data is already compressed, so "compressed" will not be much smaller but takes a lot more computing.)

  • Itunes VERY SLOW creating iphone version of a video

    I used HANDBRAKE to convert a 43 minute video from .avi to mp4, supposedly optimized for ipod/iphone. When I tried to sync the video I could not. I also tried to just drag the video from the itunes video list to the phone, this did not work either.
    Next i chose the advanced options in iTunes and clicked on "create ipod or iphone version".
    This is taking an extraordinary amount of time. The first attempt went on for about 2 hours and only got through about 2/3 of video. I cancelled the conversion, restarted the computer, and started again. The computer has been working on this task alone for about 30-40 minutes and seems to have converted only about 15-20% of a 43 minute video, from MP4 to iphone mp4.
    IS THIS NORMAL ????? SHOULD THIS PROCESS BE MUCH FASTER ?
    IS THERE A BETTER WAY ???? WHY DID HANDBRAKE NOT WORK (when it says it is creating an ipod version)?
    Thanks for any help and advice !

    Install Perian from here http://perian.org/ it will help quicktime play avi files then you can export from quicktime to iphone m4v format. Then just drag file to itunes icon in the dock. Make sure you do nothing else on the computer at the same time. Video encoding is very cpu intensive, and should always be done with nothing else running at the time for best performance.

  • Creating ImageIcon from Image is very slow

    Hi I have a program which reads a number of files which may contain (amongst other things) image data in various formats such as JPG.I read scale this down into an image object fine, and then I want to display a small version of it on screen so I put the scale dimage into an ImageIcon which i display later using a JLabel.
    Anyway it runs very slow , the funny thing is using JProbe Ive tracked the problem down to creation of the ImageIcon constructor, the actual thumbnail image creation is very quick.
    Why does ImageIcon take so long or is there a simple way of displaying the image in a Swing Application
    without using JLabel.
    BufferedImage bi = ImageIO.read(new DataInputStream(new ByteArrayInputStream(imageData)));
    Image thumbnaiImage = image.getScaledInstance(20,20Image.SCALE_FAST);
    ImageIcon thumbnail     = new ImageIcon(thumbnailImage);

    If you're not too picky about the image quality (and I see you're using SCALE_FAST), you can set the
    source subsampling on your ImageReadParam so that you never construct the large image: you start
    with the thumbnail.
    import java.awt.*;
    import java.awt.image.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import java.net.*;
    import java.util.*;
    import javax.imageio.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    public class AllThumbs {
        public static void main(String[] args) throws MalformedURLException {
            String prefix = "http://www3.us.porsche.com/english/usa/carreragt/modelinformation/experience/desktop/bilder/icon";
            String suffix = "_800x600.jpg";
            JPanel p = new JPanel(new GridLayout(0,3));
            for(int i=1; i<9; ++i) {
                try {
                    p.add(getThumb(new URL(prefix + i + suffix), 200, 150));
                } catch (IOException e) {
                    System.out.println(e.getMessage());
            JFrame f = new JFrame("AllThumbs");
            f.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            f.getContentPane().add(p);
            f.pack();
            f.setLocationRelativeTo(null);
            f.setVisible(true);
        public static JLabel getThumb(URL url, int maxWidth, int maxHeight) throws IOException {
            String suffix = getSuffix(url);
            Iterator readers = ImageIO.getImageReadersBySuffix(suffix);
            if (!readers.hasNext())
                throw new IOException("No reader for suffix " + suffix);
            ImageReader reader = (ImageReader) readers.next();
            reader.setInput(ImageIO.createImageInputStream(url.openStream()), true, true);
            int w = reader.getWidth(0), h = reader.getHeight(0);
            int subsampling = Math.max(1, Math.max(w/maxWidth, h/maxHeight));
            ImageReadParam param = reader.getDefaultReadParam();
            param.setSourceSubsampling(subsampling, subsampling, 0, 0);
            BufferedImage image = reader.read(0, param);
            String path = url.getPath();
            String text = path.substring(1+path.lastIndexOf('/'));
            JLabel label = new JLabel(text, new ImageIcon(image), SwingConstants.CENTER);
            label.setHorizontalTextPosition(SwingConstants.CENTER);
            label.setVerticalTextPosition(SwingConstants.BOTTOM);
            label.setBorder(BorderFactory.createEmptyBorder(5,5,5,5));
            return label;
        public static String getSuffix(URL url) throws IOException {
            String path = url.getPath();
            int dot = path.lastIndexOf('.');
            if (dot == -1)
                throw new IOException("No . in " + path);
            return path.substring(1+dot);
    }It is also possible for there to be thumbnail images stored in an image file. (These thumbnails
    don't even have to be related to the main image.) ImageIO has methods to read these directly,
    so if you have control over your image files you can create them with thumbnails in place.

  • CS4 very slow image linking.

    We are having a efficiency issues with CS4.
    We have a large IDML document with 80 pages and 1800 images. Each image is about 24kb jpg.
    If we open the document and InDesign can find images, it will take hours to open the document. And it is very annoying that InDesign stops responding and doesn't show even a progressbar while opening the document.
    If we open the document and InDesign cannot find images, it will open the document in few minutes. Then if we fix the location of images and say "Update all links" or "Relink" broken links, InDesign will start fetching the images but it again takes hours..
    It doesn't matter if the images are on the server or local machine.
    If we update the links in smaller chunks, it will take a few minutes to update all the links. Little more testing shows that the time the InDesign takes to fetch the images increases exponentially when the amount of images increases. That seems a bug to me.
    I'm not sure what InDesign is doing when it fetches images but I know it becomes way too slow and it propably does too much.
    Is this fixed in CS5? And if not, please fix this.
    We are running CS4 InDesign 6.0.6 in Mac OSX 10.5.8 in Mac pro (2.66GHz with 8Gb memory)

    Hello,
    I have a strange problem.
    Some of my images are VERY slow to load,
    scale... (any image operation).
    I have those 2 images :
    http://193.252.5.30/tmp/cat1.jpg (25Ko : 295x551
    pixels)
    http://193.252.5.30/tmp/cat2.jpg (24Ko : 295x551
    pixels)
    I wrote a little program which load and scale the
    image.
    Here is the result :
    cat1.jpg
    Time to load image : 171 ms.
    Time to scale image : 157 ms.
    cat2.jpg
    Time to load image : 1157 ms.
    Time to scale image : 2578 ms.How can this huge difference explained ?
    Thanks for your help.Using the Netbeans profiler, I can see that for some reason, the cat2.jpg image is resulting in a hot spot where the scale() method ends up performing a color conversion via ColorConvertOp. Placing a debugger breakpoint on this call and debugging the code using cat1.jpg, the method is never called. So, there is something different about the color models of the two images, or there is a bug in the image reading code that is misinterpreting the image data.
    This bug may be what you are seeing:
    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4705399

  • InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text

    InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text.
    Running on 2010 Macpro 2.4GHz. 8GB RAM. Any solutions? I've read through many forums on this and tried several fixes.

    Have exact same issue on  my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
    So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
    Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
    Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
    I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

  • Live Cam Voice on HP DV8305 -- Video image very slow

    I installed Live! Cam Voice on my HP DV8305 succussfully, it works, but the video image is very slow. it needs about 30sec to capture a frame, sometime just stucked. I changed the Display Adaptive Driver, used differrent USB IF, checked my CPU and Memery usage, my HD space, use differrent IM -- skype, MSN, .... Any one can help?

    As further information, the issue seems to be with the exposure setting. When I turn auto exposure off, then set exposure down as low as it will go, the picture darkens, but the frame rate goes up. I don't have this problem with my Logitech QuickCam Orbit -- I'm not sure if the problem is with the firmware, or if the CMOS sensor in the Live! Cam Voice is just smaller.

  • The latest issue of Pages for iPad: 1. Very slow. 2. Late in reacting to typing. 3. When I go to a specific file, informs me that some images were deleted and therefore file has been changed. Then when OPEN option used, opens file slowly. Please, help!

    What I have to do to correct the following problems with Pages app. For iPad:
    Hesitates to display results of typing, some times for 5-6 characters;
    Very slow in opening files;
    Before opening of a specific file displays message: DOCUMENT DETAILS. SOME CHANGES WERE MADE TO YOUR DOCUMENT. SOME IMAGES ARE MISSING BECAUSE THEY WERE DELETED FROM YOUR DOCUMENT. We'll, nothing is missing. But it takes forever to open this file. The previous issue of Pages worked very good. But they would not let me to go back to it. Please, help!

    Tmobile did the exact same thing to me. So that is customer service at work in general. Nice try though lol.
    To the OP
    I see you said You paid for shipping, did you Insure it? Claim insurance on it. If you did not, It may not be Verizon or your fault in the sense of the phone not making it to the warehouse. There are people out in the postal world that will steal phones that are not insured. It could have been a Verizon employee, i suppose.
    But, if this was to be a bought in court, if you shipped it with out insurance, sadly your at fault.
    Do you still have the Serial number of your old phone? If so, you should be able to track where your phone is (if it is reported as a defect/damaged) If so, you may be able to use that as proof. If it does not show up as a defect or what ever they determine use as a loss, then you know it did not make it to the warehouse to be checked in. I would suspect Apple or Verizon could tell you what the Serial number came up as.

  • Safari, at times does not load images on webpages, is very slow, or doesn't work at all. Rarely does it operate as one would expect.

    iMac 27" 2009 intel core 4 gigs of ram, 1tb HD, Current operating system. 2 user accounts, myself, my fiancee's. Each with iPhones so each setup to utilize iCloud. I have disabled 3rd party plug-ins once with only short-term effects. There are other issues with the computers performance and I have spoken to apple support regarding them multiple times. Some include iCloud not syncing properly to the iMac (though it does to phone and online), Finder windows getting "lost" between "digital desktops". Desktop image not syncing across all "digital desktops". iTunes often has issues with syncing with and playing from my iTunesMatch account.
    Safari's issues include it not loading any images on a website, when trying to load a new page by typing a search in the the url it won't even begin to load a page, sometimes it is very slow to load a page, a lot of time it will spend 5+ minutes "attempting" or not even visually attempting to load a webpage without warning the page can't be found, and then of course there are the "page can't be found" warnings as well.
    Very much thanks in advance,
    AK

    Safari 5.0.1 or later: Slow or partial webpage loading, or webpage cannot be found

  • While creating Billing, system is very slow..performance issue

    Hi,
    While creating Billing, system is very slow. How can I debugg and provide the analysis where is the exact problem.
    This is showing performance issue.
    Waiting for kind response.
    Best Regards,
    Padhy
    Moderator Message : Duplicate post locked.
    Edited by: Vinod Kumar on May 12, 2011 10:59 AM

    hi,
    Chk the links
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4a/e71f39488fee0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
    Re: How to create Secondary Index?
    How may secondary indices I can create on the ODS?
    Deletion of ODS index
    Ramesh

  • ADF BC: create is very slow

    Hi
    I have the following scenario:
    An ADF BC application against a Oracle10g DB, aprox 30.000 rows in the DB.
    The client is using uix.
    The server is a standalone OC4J on linux. It has 512M RAM.
    When I want to create a new record via the browser, it is very very slow (20-40 sec.) I'm using the 'immidiate' update mode. However the search facility is fast, even if I lookup all the (30.000)rows. I use the same view object for both.
    Any ideas why the create function is slow, please.

    And this one as well
    ADF Mobile: Android performance is very slow - when will this be fixed?

  • Why reports created in 8.5 and saved in XI.5 are very slow?

    Hello,
    Here is my problem :
    I worked with Crystal Report 8.5 and my reports were speedy.
    I saved a report in a new version (Crystal XI.5) and the report generation is very slow.
    If i saved the same report (saved in 8.5) in the version XI (not the XI.5) the report is speedy.
    If i saved the report from XI.5 to XI there is no change (report slow).
    Have you ever seen this problem?
    The database used is Advantage Database Server 8.1.0.26
    Thanks for the help.
    Mickael

    Hi Mariusz,
    It is expected that the reports will run a bit slow in the newer version as the entire report engine has undergone chnage after version 8.5.
    With the new version, the database security has been enforced a lot more as compared to version 8.5. Along with this, the SQL generation process has also undergone change and the SQL which is now generated is much more optimized.
    Also, there are a lot of new features in terms of formatting the report, which can cause the delay in showing you the first page of the report. It may not just be the database access that is taking time.
    As suggested earlier, if you find the query generated in 8.5 was fetching records faster, you can surely create a command object in XI R2 to check if you get the same speed of data retrival.
    Regards,
    Abhishek Jain.

  • Recently bought a samsung NX30 camera which came with lightroom 5, after several hours of googling i got it setup properly with the correct camera raw to be able to access my raw images. I found my old laptop was very slow when processing the hundreds of

    recently bought a samsung NX30 camera which came with lightroom 5, after several hours of googling i got it setup properly with the correct camera raw to be able to access my raw images. I found my old laptop was very slow when processing the hundreds of images I usually take on a weekly basis.  I bought a new faster laptop but when I looked for the cd with the software and serial I could not find it in the Xmas clutter.  I downloaded a trial version of lightroom and got it working on my new laptop. Is there a way to access the serial number from my previously installed version and insert it into the trail version to make it work for me?
    Myron

    Mea culpa
    While i registered all my cs2 thru 6 versions and my lightroom 2 thru 4 versions and recorded the serials and saved the adobe registration emails.  Since this came as a freebee with the camera i neglected this vital step.  I have the instslled version on my old laptop but want to install it on my new one.  Thanks to Jim Hess I got the serial so all is well in my world and I will register it with ADOBE
    Myron

  • Updated to LR 5.4, images now importing extremely slow. After importing and rendering images are still very slow to go through and develop. No issues in LR 5.3 which was very fast.

    After importing and rendering images are still very slow to go through and develop. No issues in LR 5.3 which was very fast. Canon,Nikon, Leica and Fuji files all rendering slow. iMac 2.9 ghz 16gb RAM OSX 10.8.5. Catalogs and images are kept on external drives. Drives running fine. Really need a fix on this since I'm norally imported and processing at least 4,000 images per LR Catalog. Is there way to revert back to 5.3? I can't use 5.4 is its current state. Thanks.

    Download LR 5.3 and install it
    By the way, lots of people have this complaint about LR 5.4, and the advice I give is to use LR 5.3 unless you need one of the new camera models supported by LR 5.4

  • Facebook loading is very slow with nearly no images , i'm using mac

    facebook loading is very slow with nearly no images , i'm using mac os x 10.8

    i did it many times and the same problem exists

Maybe you are looking for