Very slow graphics on Windows XP

I've just ontalled Boot Camp and the windows xp professional on my MacBook Pro (mid 2010 2.66 GHz Core i7, 8 GB Ram).
All seems to work vell BUT the graphics in Windows is EXTREMELY slow (unaceptable) when une 100% graphic acceleration and definitively SLOW (just acceptable) when reducing to zero the acceleration.
Now I'm going to install a program (simulator) that needs fast graphics and it refuse to run because it detects a too slow graphics performance of the system.
This one is a new installation of Boot Camp since I've upgraded to a new 750 GB hard disk and I had to reinstall all Windows from scratch; in the previous disk I had no problem with the same Windows and (as far I remember) the same installation.
Is there anyone that can help me? Is there any new Boot Camp version around? I've just upgraded to Mac OS Lion, but it seems that Lion does not have nothing to do.

I would have moved to Windows 7, better support for i7 and of course 64-bit / 8GB, seriously.
I am not sure but guessing it has Nvidia 3xxM (Mobility)
Verde Driver v267.24 BETA
267.24
March 1, 2011
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/Find.aspx
And yes, the latest beta. Though with XP I am never 100% certain, and use to be modified drivers such as from Laptop2go had to be used, I think that is less an issue; though one person recently said they had to use very old 18x.xxx driver on their system.
Windows 7 has better driver support today.

Similar Messages

  • Very slow graphics when using AMD Radeon HD 6490M with Yosemite

    I'm using a 15" MacBook Pro early 2011. When I switch to the GPU using gfxCardStatus (or because an app requires it), all graphics become very slow: window dragging, window miniaturize animation, moving the mouse in the menubar etc. 3D view in Maps.app is very slow. All is fine when using the integrated Intel HD 3000. I did not have this problem with Yosemite Developer Previews (I did not install the GMs), nor with Mavericks.
    I tried using AMD kext from the DP, but things are worst (I suppose the kext are not loaded at all because the signature does not match).

    Hi. I tried to do that with the same download package on my Pavilion DV6 CTO Quad edition and it fails to install the driver because of a conflict with the C++ Redistributable 2010 package build into the installer. Does anyone know if HP is going to update the switchable graphic drivers for Windows 8? They better!

  • Very slow bootup for windows 7 home premium on x200

    hi i had recently bought the windows 7 home premium upgrade for my x200 with ocz vertex ssd. x200 model : 7459 p57. since i have install the os, i got a very slow bootup at the welcome page. anyone facing the issue or any solution? previously using the windows 7 rc edition with the ssd, there's no issue. can anyone help me?

    You can probably simply download all the Windows 7 versions from the Lenovo Web site. Win 7 by itself will install enough to get you running for the most part.

  • CS4 apps are VERY slow to open Windows file browser with File Open or File Save As commands

    We are running CS4 on Windows 7 with all available updates installed.   Photoshop and the other CS4 applications are VERY slow to open a Windows file browsing window to select files when File Open or File Save As menu options are run -- it can take as long as a minute or two for the window to open.  Once the window opens and a file is selected, then opening or saving the file is very quick.  The location of the default directory, whether it is on a local drive or a network drive, makes no difference.  Any suggestions as to what the problem might be?

    Raphman02
    The link that I posted earlier is off.  Read this one
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2501584.  I discovered in my network that the MS Office File Validation Patch made excel crawl when opening over the network though nothing else changed. At the time I was opening Excel on Office 2003.
    You can manually turn this off by editing the registry and tunring it off.  Going forward I skipped the patch to keep my sanity.  Not sure if this is the same as your issue, but the support article will go into detail how to either have Fix it
    clear the issue or change the proper registry keys.
    Hope this helps

  • Satellite A300 - Very slow statrting of Windows OS

    hello
    i own a Toshiba a300.
    I'm facing a lot of problems with it.
    Firstly, its very slow at start up..... I'v read read this post
    -removing all useless software from the system
    -removing preinstalled antivir application and installation of Avira Antivir software (for me definitely the best one because it doesn't need so many resources)
    -disabling start up for all processes that I donâ't need (MSCONFIG)
    -disabling all hardware components I don't need in device manager (modem, multicard reader, PCMCIA slot, firewire)
    Pls can u mention precisely what all are useless softwares in my laptop...... This is first time im owning a computer so i donnno much....
    I'm using kaspersky anti virus. Should i switch to avira?? I'm also facing another problem. My led on/off function doesnt work instead it acts as a mute button. It used to be fine earlier... I tried button support (dimmer.exe), HW setup but both failed... then i uninstalled n reinstalled some value added pack from an australian site but that too failed... pls help ..... I'm p***** off..... any suggestions/help will be really appreciated.

    >Pls can u mention precisely what all are useless softwares in my laptop......
    Only you can decide what software is not important for you
    Toshiba has preinstalled many different programs. Most of these applications controls some notebook features like FN buttons, controls, etc but of course such software needs hardware resources and slow down the booting procedure.
    In MSCONFIG you can disable some processes and could test how the notebook would run without these applications.
    Furthermore I recommend updating or removing the Tempro tool which was preinstalled by Toshiba!
    The Avira scanner is great. Im using it as well and its for free.
    Its low hardware eater and therefore the notebook should boot faster using Avira instead Kaspersky.

  • Very slow and unsuccessful windows 8.1 installation on latest imac 5 k retina display

    When i bought my 5k retina imac 3 months ago i decided i also wanted to have windows 8.1 in it. For the first time last week i wasnt able to boot windows as it would get stuck on the windows logo screen. After several failed attempts i decided to unpartition my drive using bootcamp and remove windows and then reinstall it from scratch. The installation process is really slow, it takes a good 2 hours to get passed the first part of windows installation and then it either gets stuck on a windows logo when it restarts automatically or when i reach the bootcamp drivers installation it just never gets passed that. The installation interface is also very laggy, for example when i click next it takes a minute or two to load the next part.
    I have tried reinstalling the whole ios using recovery hd and internet recovery and i have also verified my disk using disk utility. Although everything works fine on the mac side and disks are allright , i cannot install windows due to the problem mentioned above. I have tried everything in my knowledge and this is really frustrating as its a new machine, please help me out, cheers.

    Here is my disk layout with a Fusion drive and Bootcamp on the SSD (256G Samsung 840 Pro/1TB Hitachi HDD).
    diskutil list
    /dev/disk0
       #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
       0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *256.1 GB   disk0
       1:                        EFI EFI                     209.7 MB   disk0s1
       2:          Apple_CoreStorage                         128.0 GB   disk0s2
       3:                 Apple_Boot Boot OS X               134.2 MB   disk0s3
       4:       Microsoft Basic Data BOOTCAMP                127.7 GB   disk0s4
    /dev/disk1
       #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
       0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *1.0 TB     disk1
       1:                        EFI EFI                     209.7 MB   disk1s1
       2:          Apple_CoreStorage                         999.3 GB   disk1s2
       3:                 Apple_Boot Boot OS X               650.0 MB   disk1s3
    /dev/disk2
       #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
       0:                  Apple_HFS OSX-FusionHD           *1.1 TB     disk2
    diskutil cs list
    CoreStorage logical volume groups (1 found)
    |
    +-- Logical Volume Group DF140929-90E7-48E1-AC3D-C9C75BA88D1D
        =========================================================
        Name:         OSX-FusionHD
        Status:       Online
        Size:         1127375384576 B (1.1 TB)
        Free Space:   69632 B (69.6 KB)
        |
        +-< Physical Volume C856A74C-EB57-4D1F-8223-0A22215218ED
        |   ----------------------------------------------------
        |   Index:    0
        |   Disk:     disk0s2
        |   Status:   Online
        |   Size:     128030257152 B (128.0 GB)
        |
        +-< Physical Volume 80D91A14-CCC9-47B1-B071-B9ADFF23924F
        |   ----------------------------------------------------
        |   Index:    1
        |   Disk:     disk1s2
        |   Status:   Online
        |   Size:     999345127424 B (999.3 GB)
        |
        +-> Logical Volume Family 019D610F-21AC-4B54-AB0A-6D5F90D520A7
            Encryption Status:       Unlocked
            Encryption Type:         None
            Conversion Status:       NoConversion
            Conversion Direction:    -none-
            Has Encrypted Extents:   No
            Fully Secure:            No
            Passphrase Required:     No
            |
            +-> Logical Volume D9DC0F70-38C7-4AE6-BAC4-CFBE0F8D4F68
                Disk:                  disk2
                Status:                Online
                Size (Total):          1118844862464 B (1.1 TB)
                Conversion Progress:   -none-
                Revertible:            No
                LV Name:               OSX-FusionHD
                Volume Name:           OSX-FusionHD
                Content Hint:          Apple_HFS

  • HP Truevision HD running very slow after installing windows 8

    Hi.
    I have hp 1000-1140TU Notebook PC.
    It came with Windows7-Home Basic and CyberLink YouCam worked smooth on it.
    Since i've installed windows8, and installed Cyberlink YouCam for windows8, my webcam is running really slow! There is too much lag. Please help?

    Hi,
    Did you verify that all of the required drivers were installed after the Win8 install was complete?
    You can check that by clicking on the search charm and then typing in Device Manager and clicking on the device manager icon that appears.
    Best regards,
    erico 
    ****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
    2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

  • Satellite A300-1PH - Very slow statrting of Windows

    Toshiba Satellite A300- 1PH.
    Due to some Viruses, I started the recovery on my laptop and installed the fresh windows Vista Home premium. But now I am facing a problem.
    My windows load very slowly. When I start my Laptop, after the logo of Windows appear, it takes almost 4-5 minutes to load the Destop and the Secreen shows the message "Please Wait".
    Before recovery it never took such a long time. It's been onliy 1 month I have bought it.
    Can any body tell me please what is the actualy problem?

    I am very happy you are satisfied now. Many times on this forum I wrote about right OS configuration.
    Anyway, Tempro is nice application and useful for people with low level of notebook knowledge who need some help with updates and notebook monitoring. In my opinion this can just confuse notebook owners with different messages and upgrade notifications.
    I recommend you to remove it from the system. Believe me with les such background running processes and applications your notebook will run better and more stabile.
    For years I use Avira Antivir and it the best solution. It runs in the background, doesnt need many resources and make updates automatically. You can get it for free under http://www.free-av.com/
    Latest version is 9.00.
    If you have more questions please let me know.
    Bye and good luck.

  • JTable scrolling in Windows 7 very slow compared to Windows XP

    I am running the following test program on jdk-6u18. The program displays a simple 900 rows x 20 columns table with each cell being an integer 1. When I run this is Windows 7, the scrollbar handle cannot keep up with the mouse movement as I drag it up and down. But the scrolling is very smooth if I run it on a Windows XP virtual machine on the same PC. Is there any way to improve the JTable performance on Windows 7?
    Thanks.
    import java.awt.*;
    import javax.swing.table.*;
    import javax.swing.*;
    public class TableTestSimple extends AbstractTableModel {
        static final Integer tableValue = new Integer(1);
        static final String columnName = "Column";
        @Override public int getColumnCount() {
            return 20;
        @Override public int getRowCount() {
            return 900;
        @Override public Object getValueAt(int row, int column) {
            return tableValue;
        @Override public String getColumnName (int columnIndex) {
            return columnName;
        @Override public Class getColumnClass (int columnIndex) {
                return Integer.class;
        public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
            TableTestSimple t = new TableTestSimple();
            JFrame frame = new JFrame("Table Test");
            JPanel panel = new JPanel();
            panel.setLayout(new BorderLayout());
            JTable table = new JTable(t);
            JScrollPane scrollPane = new JScrollPane(table);
            panel.add(scrollPane, BorderLayout.CENTER);
            panel.setPreferredSize(new java.awt.Dimension(1000, 1000));
            frame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE);
            frame.setContentPane(panel);
            frame.pack();
            frame.setVisible(true);
    }

    I ran your code and didn't get the problem stated.Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
    Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    C:\Users\Darryl>java -version
    java version "1.6.0_17"
    Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_17-b04)
    Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 14.3-b01, mixed mode, sharing)Possibly a defective video driver. You could try installing optional updates from Windows Update.
    db

  • ITunes 10.6.3.25 very slow to respond - Windows 7 64 bit

    After having sworn off iTunes over 10 years ago, I just installed the latest version this weekend -- my kids gave me a Touch for Father's Day and my son assured me that iTunes had improved over the years.  My experiences with it so far would indicate that is not the case.
    It takes a number of minutes to synch to my iPod Touch (8Gb version) -- this was before there was even any music on it.  While this is happening, the iTUnes exe is using one full core of CPU processing continually, and the program is unresponsive in Windows.  After much waiting, I managed to get a small test selection of music on the device.  If I play this from within iTunes, it will play, but if I then pick a different song to play, I need to again wait several minutes durig which iTunes is again unresponsive.  The same wait occurs trying to exit iTunes.  I have disabled auto synching, but I am still getting these ridiculous delays.  This is on a fast Intel Core i7 machine, so I can only imagine how long this would take on an older machine.  While this hang is occuring, there is one maxed out core, but there is no change to memory usage, so nothing is actually happening, and the program is just spinnning its wheels.  (Without handling the Windows message queue properly, either.)  This should not be this painful.  These are small mp3 files being transferred onto a small device.  These transfers and synchs should take miliseconds, not minutes..
    Anyone have any suggestions?  I feel like I'm back in 1995 when I try to use this program.

    I hvae the EXACT same issue
    I built a new computer which is EXTREMELY fast overclocked i7 ect and.. ITUNES DOESNT WORK
    I click on itunes which ive uninstalled and reinstalled and reset the winsock AND seen if there were any errors AAAAAAND ive check the Hkey to make sure bonjur was the only one in there which it is and all that happens is my cpu goes to 25% and i cant do anything except go into the task manager and close it! ANYTHING with itunes (everything else is premium speed).
    what do i do
    windows 7 64 bit

  • DB performance is very slow from a WINDOWS machine

    Hi,
    We have written an application which contains a pkg that will write all the logs related to application in the form of a text file. We are using utl file operation to achieve the same. As of now I have 2 Setups. We have two IBM servers with similar configuration, one in which we have installed Windows server 2003 and the other with HP-UX. We have installed 11g version of DB In these two machines. The problem is with the performance of the application. The DB in Unix server takes less time for writing the log. For eg: it takes 10 secs to write 5MB log. But the same takes more than an hour from a Windows machine. I want to know whether the performance of the DB depends on the OS which we are operating from or else it depends on the parameters set for the DB? Kindly help me.
    Thanks
    Vin..

    tyro_vin wrote:
    Hi,
    We have written an application which contains a pkg that will write all the logs related to application in the form of a text file. We are using utl file operation to achieve the same. As of now I have 2 Setups. We have two IBM servers with similar configuration, one in which we have installed Windows server 2003 and the other with HP-UX. We have installed 11g version of DB In these two machines. The problem is with the performance of the application. The DB in Unix server takes less time for writing the log. For eg: it takes 10 secs to write 5MB log. But the same takes more than an hour from a Windows machine. I want to know whether the performance of the DB depends on the OS which we are operating from or else it depends on the parameters set for the DB? Kindly help me.I did some testing a while back between windows and linux and the difference on properly configured windows and linux database servers (same hardware same db version) wasn't worth talking about (< 10% often less than 5%).
    That said it's not clear what exactly you mean. If you mean that writing a 5mb file on a windows machine takes an hour, then yep something is badly wrong - most likely with the hardware. I suspect though that what you mean is that you do a bunch of database work and that takes an hour on one machine and 10s on the other. This is likely to be a problem amenable to response time analysis, that is to say talking your workload and tracing it with timing information to see where it is spending the time. As you say it is your package, you will also be able to (and should) instrument your own code to see where the time is spent.
    given the huge difference, you may well also find that statspack/awr will spit out your offending processes quite well as well.
    regards
    Niall Litchfield
    http://www.orawin.info/

  • Very slow DFSR on Windows Server 2008

    We need to have distributed file system between two location.
    I evaluating possibility to use DFS and two Windows Server 2008 to do it.
    I set up two computer with clean installation of system.
    The test is on two local subnets, so speed should not be an issue.
    Each server is defined in separate logical site.
    The DFSR folder I create on one server has 50 GB / 40,000 files.
    The initial replication still is not finished after couple of days.
    The transfer speed is only about 5kB/s and 3 files / min.
    I increase staging quote to 100GB, so it should not be a limit.
    I also make simple test of speed between both servers.
    I create shared folder on both servers and manually copy files.
    The transfer speed is reasonable 5 MB/s (1000 time faster that DFSR).
    There is no processor load on servers (0% CPU).
    This is test before real use so server do almost nothing else.
    The event log shows sometimes 5014 but followed immediately with 5004.
    Does anybody have an idea what is wrong?

    Thank you for your help.
    The replication process just stopped.
    This morning target folder size is exactly same as yesterday.
    Previously it at least slowly increase.
    I looked at those log files, but I still need to understand them.
    The log level is default (means 4) and there is many entries there.
    Anyway I attached examples, while searching what it their meaning.
    The source server:
    Many warning looking like this:
    20090529 08:30:34.122 2772 SRTR  2344 [WARN] InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion Failed connId:{} rdc:0 uid:{}-v74162 gsvn:{}-v74162 Error:  [Error:170(0xaa) InitializeFileTransferAsyncState::ProcessIoCompletion servertransport.cpp:2235 2772 W The requested resource is in use.] completion:0 ptr:09B27F40
    From time to time errors sequence:
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 DOWN  3991 [ERROR] DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} rgName:Common Volume Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO  3566 InConnection::RestartSession Retrying establish contentset session. connId:{} csId:{} csName:common
    20090529 08:33:33.086 2608 INCO   774 [WARN] SessionTask::Step (Ignored) Failed, should have already been processed. Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::EstablishSession inconnection.cpp:3657 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:4005 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) DownstreamTransport::EstablishSession downstreamtransport.cpp:3984 2608 C The content set is not ready]
    The target server:
    20090529 08:31:33.054 3196 SRTR   784 [WARN] SERVER_EstablishSession Failed on connId:{} csId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) UpstreamTransport::EstablishSession upstreamtransport.cpp:707 3196 C The content set is not ready]
    +    [Error:9051(0x235b) OutConnection::EstablishSession outconnection.cpp:2623 3196 C The content set is not ready]
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN  2723 AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Completion. connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 ptr:056820B0
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 DOWN  2748 [ERROR] AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive Failed on connId:{} csId:{} reqType:AsyncPollRequest reqState:Completed status:9026 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 INCO  2543 InConnection::ReConnect Ignoring reconnect. state:4 connId:{}
    20090529 08:31:33.974 1664 RPCN   663 [ERROR] IoPortManager::ThreadEntryProc (Ignored) Failed IoCompletionProcessVvUp. Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ProcessReceive downstreamtransport.cpp:2809 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2131 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9026(0x2342) AsyncRpcHandler::ReceiveAsyncPoll downstreamtransport.cpp:2073 1664 C The connection is invalid]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET  2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO  5599 InConnection::LogTransferActivity Failed to receive RAWGET uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 fileName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png connId:{} csId:{} stagedSize:0 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 1920 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 INCO  2705 InConnection::ProcessErrorStatus (Ignored) Remote error connId:{} Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]
    20090529 08:30:34.118 1920 MEET  2032 Meet::Download Download Succeeded : false updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_7153b1c3.png uid:{}-v74169 gvsn:{}-v74169 connId:{} csName:common csId:{}
    20090529 08:30:34.118 2588 MEET  1263 Meet::Install -> WAIT Error processing update. updateName:Tutorial_V2_Gerotor_Surfaces_html_6de9f06.png uid:{}-v74168 gvsn:{}-v74168 connId:{} csName:common csId:{} code:170 Error:
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::InstallStep meet.cpp:1657 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) Meet::Download meet.cpp:2052 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) InConnection::RawGet inconnection.cpp:5688 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4768 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) RpcFinalizeContext downstreamtransport.cpp:1096 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:9027(0x2343) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 C A failure was reported by the remote partner]
    +    [Error:170(0xaa) DownstreamTransport::RawGet downstreamtransport.cpp:4711 2588 W The requested resource is in use.]

  • G460 became very slow after installing windows 7...help with one touch recovery??

    hi ...i got a laptop from friend  9 months ago from us ....its g460 with windows 7 home premium os...for practising sharepoint tech: i installed windows 7 ultimate 1 month back and after that i tried to install .net and sharepoint s/w with no use...after that whenever i start its taking neary 15 mins to start itself and then its saying windows s7 is not genuine...si i called up service center and they said that s/w instllation they dont cover under warranty ..and they are charging around sme 2000 bucks to install windows 7 premium  and said that we will also provide one touch recovery...
    cant i with online support do the one touch recovery and get back the laptop in the previous state?? what is this one touch recovery all about?? is it only for data ?? thanks in advance.

    hey durgamavu,
    Do check the following >>
    http://consumersupport.lenovo.com/%28S%28wjgnfm55b​e4kejqew1t0nj55%29%29/lk/en/HintsandTips/hints_sho​...
    WW Social Media
    Important Note: If you need help, post your question in the forum, and include your system type, model number and OS. Do not post your serial number.
    Did someone help you today? Press the star on the left to thank them with a Kudo!
    If you find a post helpful and it answers your question, please mark it as an "Accepted Solution"!
    Follow @LenovoForums on Twitter!
    Have you checked out the Community Knowledgebase yet?!
    How to send a private message? --> Check out this article.

  • AIR 3.0 Application Built in HTML/Javascript VERY SLOW on Windows 7 and XP

    Hello AIR Team,
    The commercial AIR application I'm developing for a client (using HTML/CSS/Javascript) is VERY SLOW on my Windows 7 (64 bit) and Windows XP machines running on the Adobe AIR 3.0 runtime. I notice the poor performance in all aspects of the application, but especially on mouse events (mouseover, mouseout, click).
    However, it runs very well on my Mac OS X 10.6.8 test machine AND from within Dreamweaver CS5.5 on my Windows 7 machine.
    Chris Campbell from Adobe posted in another topic on this forum that he has notified the Adobe Webkit Team about this issue, but I'm anxious to know WHEN the Adobe AIR Team will release an AIR update/patch to resolve these performance issues.
    Any ETA on the update/patch?
    ~Oscar

    This performance issue is tracked in adobe bugbase: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=2958614
    It is appreciated that anyone affected by this issue could leave vote notes about how the fix is important for you and your business.
    Thanks,
    Jian
    Adobe Flash Runtime team

  • USB 3 and Windows 8 very slow

    Greetings.
    I'm new on this forum allthough I have had this mobo about ½ year, but when I tried to get Windows 8 Pro upand running I ran into troubble.
    Intel Rapid Start don't work in Win8, worked really good in Win7
    Can't switch "Windows 8" feature on in BIOS (have read here, that I'm not the only one with that problem)
    But my biggest complain is the performance of USB3. I use it for backup, and it is very slow compared to Windows 7. I can't find any USB3 driver on MSI's download. I know ASUS has made an "USB3 BOOST" but I don't know what it is, or if it is helping. Windows 8 has native driversupport for USB3, but it is only to get it to basic work, much much slower than the same USB3 port in Windows 7. Does anyboby know how to raise the USB3 speed?
    Sorry for my English. As I'm danish, English is not my first language, but I hope you get the meaning of this 

    Could well be a driver issue as you mentioned. MSI doesn't make the drivers, they are supplied new ones by the vendor of the hardware. Normally they are tested by the MSI engineers first, certified to be good, and then released on their webite for download. The growing pains of 'Vista' 8 (sarcasm) continue!

Maybe you are looking for