Very slow performance in CS6 X64 compared to CS5 X64 and temp file very big

Hello to everyone,
I have the same problem as described on this link and the same "solution" to move to layer "easily without delay" !
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4290563
the solution to remove these huge delays is:
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4290563
"1.  Go the Layers Palette fly-out menu and select Panel Options... "
"2.  Set Thumbnails to "None"
My computer setup:
Windows 7 x64 SP1
CPU Core i7 (@3.7 GHz)
NVIDIA GTX295 (latest drivers)
Total 12Gb RAM (8Gb for system + 4Gb for RAMDISK R:\)
C:\ = SSD
D:\ = Velociraptor 150Gb
E:\ = Velociraptor 300Gb
R:\ 4Gb (temp files for windows, user, winzip and more)
My tests with file 66.4 MB with much layer, text, group. Photoshop is already running and I use the menu "File / Open" :
IN CS5 (12.0.4) X64:
about 6.13 seconds
size of the temporary file on C:\ = 2951296 KB
Setup in photoshop:
10943 Mo memory seen
Percent of possible use memory 82% (8974 Mo)
IN CS6 X64:
about 137 seconds
size of the temporary file on C:\ = 20216832 KB
Setup in photoshop:
10991 Mo memory seen
Percent of possible use memory 82% (9012 Gb)
Sorry for my bad English, I do my best to explain the problem identified.
Steve

Hi Adam,
I did the test and that's exactly the right solution. Actually if I put "128" (which is default in CS5) instead of 1024 (which is default in CS6), charging is as fast as with CS5 and in addition the temporary file is also much less fat (the same size with CS5 !)
I note that the speed problem that I mentioned is not really a problem, but only because of a difference in configuration "default" of the two versions.
Still the problem of activation or none of "Thumbnails" which creates delays (even unable to work properly) to move layers or group. Problem mentioned (and shown in video) on the link I put in my first message !
Thank you,
Steve

Similar Messages

  • Lion: very slow performance of my macbook pro

    very slow performance.
    went to terminal, did the top command, and got following results (mind you, ONLY have Safari and of course Terminal open):
    Processes: 96 total, 4 running, 9 stuck, 83 sleeping, 419 threads      19:07:17
    Load Avg: 1.99, 1.81, 1.59  CPU usage: 2.36% user, 5.21% sys, 92.41% idle
    SharedLibs: 1660K resident, 0B data, 0B linkedit.
    MemRegions: 15947 total, 2662M resident, 47M private, 209M shared.
    PhysMem: 695M wired, 2175M active, 1083M inactive, 3953M used, 13M free.
    VM: 250G vsize, 1093M framework vsize, 699065(68) pageins, 1724738(881) pageouts
    Networks: packets: 70104/55M in, 66648/10M out.
    Disks: 966630/9347M read, 327765/18G written.
    PID   COMMAND      %CPU  TIME     #TH  #WQ  #POR #MREG RPRVT  RSHRD  RSIZE
    4058  top          5.2   00:03.32 1/1  0    28   29    912K   216K   1620K
    4055  bash         0.0   00:00.02 1    0    20   23    356K   216K   1112K
    4052  CVMCompiler  0.0   00:00.30 1    0    30   69    7780K  220K   16M
    4051  login        0.0   00:00.08 2    1    33   63    928K   216K   2184K
    4049  Terminal     0.3   00:01.34 7    3    128+ 164+  7580K+ 13M    15M+
    4042  ocspd        0.0   00:00.02 1    0    26   33    420K+  276K   1376K+
    4041  WebProcess   0.0   00:04.35 7    3    119  201   16M-   10M    26M-
    4039  Safari       1.1   00:09.44 12   3    193  413   47M-   20M    81M-
    3958  spindump_age 0.0   00:00.02 2    2    38   55    356K   220K   1100K
    3956  spindump     1.3   00:42.93 16/1 13   228  145   46M+   15M    53M+
    3953  aosnotifyd   0.0   00:00.18 3    1    53   279   2064K  3532K  6156K
    3939  AddressBookM 6.8   06:59.11 4    1    68   4067+ 2131M- 3308K  1554M-
    3895  lsboxd       0.0   00:00.06 2    2    49   69    1156K  6820K  3292K
    3031  cookied      0.0   00:01.36 2    1    42   82    2028K  268K   3
    every minute or so the computer blocks, every 3 or 4 hours I have to restart etc.
    any suggestions?

    ok, stopped syncing in System preferences and even (horror) deleted the file which reappeared in seconds.
    now waiting to see if stopping the syncing helps - though computer is now working a bit better, the info on Activity Monitor would indicate it is not a real improvement
    473           AddressBookMobileMeSharingAgent          me          1,4          4          1.020,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    312           helpd          me          0,4          65          358,9 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    0           kernel_task          root          1,1          76          336,6 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    459           Mail          me          0,4          9          276,2 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    194           java          root          0,1          30          162,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    405           Safari          me          0,5          12          120,0 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    407           Safari Web Content          me          0,2          7          100,3 MB          Intel (64 bit)
    195           WindowServer          _windowserver          0,5          7          64,4 MB          Intel (64 bit)

  • Acrobat very Slow performance (50% CPU usage)

    My acrobat 9 PRO (9.3.2) has suddently started to use 50% of my CPU usage everytime a *.pdf document is opened.
    It is the task Acrobat.exe which is the problem. This results in VERY slow performance and I cannot use the review function without adobe is crashing!
    This has not always been a problem!
    Does anyone know why this is happening?
    I have tried to uninstall and reinstall acrobat, without any luck!
    Thanks
    Peder

    You probably have the same problem as I do. I use version 9.3.3 on a fairly powerful machine with Windows vista. In my case, the problem is related to the weblink.api (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/675941?tstart=0). I also uninstalled, reinstalled, repaired - nothing helps.

  • InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text

    InDesign CC 2014 very slow performance when dragging images and changing text.
    Running on 2010 Macpro 2.4GHz. 8GB RAM. Any solutions? I've read through many forums on this and tried several fixes.

    Have exact same issue on  my Windows 7 machine. Resetting preferences is a workaround.
    So I start InDesign whilst holding down these keys.
    Ctrl + Alt + Shift (Windows) or Cmd + Ctrl + Opt + Shift (Mac)
    Whilst inDesign is usable again with this fix- I have to do it every time so it trashes all my preferences so NOT GOOD long term fix. Otherwise InDesign freezes and can only be stopped by forcing a quit.
    I have manually deleted the preference files and I have created a brand new admin account - but still no luck - will be onto support tomorrow

  • Smart collection very slow (performance)

    I have a problem with the Smart Collection. They are very slow in 3.2
    I did a little test and compared 2.7 with 3.2 with the same catalog.
    In 2.7 catalog all the smart collections are very fast.
    So I have the same catalog with the same smart collections. Often they take 5 - 10 seconds when clicked the first time.
    Even a Smart collection yielding 2 images can take up to 5 - 10 seconds.
    This is the Smart Collection
    Name:              Testing
    Match:             All
    Field:               Filename
    Expression:     contains
    Value              ANH_20090331_4253.JPG,ANH_20090331_4254.JPG,
    This should result in 2 image. The full names are given.
    In LR 2.7 the results are there in a split of a second. In 3.2 the first time you click on it it takes 5 - 10 seconds. The processor goes to 50% all the time.
    Even a normal collection (not smart collections) with 97 images takes more than 5 seconds when clicked. This is very slow.
    The second time it is within a second. But clicking another "difficult smart collection" and returning, then again it takes 5 - 10 seconds.
    For the record:
    Lightroom version: 3.2 [692106]
    Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (Build 2600)
    Version: 5.1 [2600]
    Application architecture: x86
    System architecture: x86
    Physical processor count: 2
    Processor speed: 2,9 GHz
    Built-in memory: 2047,0 MB
    Real memory available to Lightroom: 716,8 MB
    Real memory used by Lightroom: 150,8 MB (21,0%)
    Virtual memory used by Lightroom: 148,0 MB
    Memory cache size: 62,4 MB
    System DPI setting: 96 DPI
    Displays: 1) 1280x1024
    Serial Number: 116040017934919748523304
    Application folder: C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.2
    Library Path: D:\Lightroom\FotoDatabase\FotoDatabase-3.lrcat
    Settings Folder: C:\Documents and Settings\Dick\Application Data\Adobe\Lightroom

    Smart collections are really slow for me also.
    It takes well over two minutes to populate the collection's images counts when first starting lightroom.  I have approx 80 smart collections, some quite complex, but even so, this seems very slow.  Once the inital counts have populated, showing the images is reasonably fast.
    The rest of LR is pretty fast, SC's are the only thing that bothers me.
    Using LR 3.3RC, high end PC:
         Win7x64
         i7/860
         16GB RAM
         SSD for boot
         SSD for LR
         45,000 images in catalogue
    Mike

  • E50 very slow performance

    my E50 is giving very slow performance anyway to tune it up ?? dosn't hangs but its slow ?? any solution ps whats the best antivirus to install in E50 ?

    I don't use your same workflow, and I assume you're shooting RAW. However,  after I have built 1:1 previews in LR (which takes a LONG time), when I click on a file to decide if it's sharp or not, it still takes 5-10 seconds for each file to load. And my computer isn't slow, and I have the same issue on my laptop, which is new and fast. I haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this problem, nor much acknowledgement from Adobe. My files are from a Nikon D7100 with 24 megapixels, so the file size is likely a factor.
    If you are shooting the type of subjects where you use 1:1 previews primarily to determine sharpness, you could consider Photo Mechanic (unfortunately it costs $150) as the first step in your workflow. It uses the embedded jpg files in the RAW file, so it loads 1:1 jpg previews almost instantly. Sports and nature photographers use this product all the time, mostly to delete losers.

  • Formatted Search with DI  leads to a very slow performance - HELP....

    Hello There
    I have defined some formatted search in OPCH - everything is working fine.
    I have added some logic to this form via the DI.(handlling 1 item press_event), and I get a very very slow performance - the ADDON-EXE jumps TO 230MEGA of memory, and entering values to each row in the tables/item in the form takes about 15 seconds.
    Any suggestions?
    RGDS
    HAGAI

    Hi Hagai,
    Normally an addon written using the DI would take up 60-80MBs.
    Are you filtering out all events except for the item press event for the form? If you are not filtering events then this can have quite a drastic affect on performance.
    What logic have you got behind the press event? If the addon exe is ballooning out to 230MB then it suggests that there is either a problem with a memory leak or that an error is occuring in the code. I would recommend putting try/catch clauses at suitable places in the code and maybe specifically setting objects to null and calling the .NET garbage collector to try and minimise the potential for memory leaks.
    Are you sure that it is the combination of the formatted search and the addon that is causing the problem, i.e. if you take away the formatted search but leave the addon do you still get poor performance or does everything speed up?
    Hope this helps,
    Owen

  • Very slow performance, need assistance

    I have a program that has very slow performance (and I mean SLOW).  I was hoping somebody could tell me how to improve the performance.  I know where it hangs up (at LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.) but I'm not sure what I need to do to make it quicker.  Any help would be appreciated.
    TABLES: vbak,
            vbpa,
            adrc.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_detail,
             vbeln TYPE vbak-vbeln,
             erdat TYPE vbak-erdat,
             vdatu TYPE vbak-vdatu,
             adrnr TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
             sa_name TYPE adrc-name1,
             sa_street TYPE adrc-street,
             sa_city TYPE adrc-city1,
             sa_state TYPE adrc-region,
             sa_zip TYPE adrc-post_code1,
             sa_tel TYPE adrc-tel_number,
             kunnr TYPE vbpa-kunnr,
             ag_name TYPE kna1-name1,
             ag_street TYPE kna1-stras,
             ag_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
             ag_state TYPE kna1-regio,
             ag_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
             ag_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
             vkbur TYPE knvv-vkbur,
             we_num TYPE likp-kunnr,
             we_name TYPE kna1-name1,
             we_name2 TYPE kna1-name2,
             we_street TYPE kna1-stras,
             we_city TYPE kna1-ort01,
             we_state TYPE kna1-regio,
             we_zip TYPE kna1-pstlz,
             we_tel TYPE kna1-telf1,
           END OF ty_detail.
    DATA: it_detail TYPE TABLE OF ty_detail WITH KEY vbeln adrnr kunnr we_num,
          wa_detail LIKE LINE OF it_detail.
    DATA: addressnum TYPE vbpa-adrnr,
          temp_kunnr TYPE likp-kunnr.
    * S E L E C T I O N - S C R E E N
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK required WITH FRAME TITLE text-002.
    SELECT-OPTIONS:  s_vdatu FOR vbak-vdatu OBLIGATORY.    "Req delivery date
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK required.
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF BLOCK temp WITH FRAME TITLE text-001.
    SELECT-OPTIONS:  s_auart FOR vbak-auart OBLIGATORY.
    PARAMETER:  p_parfun TYPE vbpa-parvw DEFAULT 'Z5' OBLIGATORY.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF BLOCK temp.
    *INITIALIZATION.
    *  REFRESH s_auart.
    *  CLEAR s_auart.
    *  s_auart-sign = 'I'.
    *  s_auart-option = 'EQ'.
    *  s_auart-low = 'OR'.
    *  APPEND s_auart.
    *  s_auart-low = 'ZDT'.
    *  APPEND s_auart.
    * END OF SELECTION SCREEN
    * M A I N - B O D Y
    *Main select statement.
    SELECT a~vbeln a~erdat a~vdatu c~adrnr c~kunnr
        INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_detail
        FROM vbak AS a
          INNER JOIN vbap AS b
              ON b~vbeln = a~vbeln
          INNER JOIN vbpa AS c
              ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
    *          AND c~posnr = b~posnr
                   WHERE a~auart IN s_auart
                   AND a~vdatu IN s_vdatu
                   AND c~parvw = p_parfun.
    LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
          FROM adrc INTO (wa_detail-sa_name, wa_detail-sa_street, wa_detail-sa_city, wa_detail-sa_state,
                            wa_detail-sa_zip, wa_detail-sa_tel)
          WHERE addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
          FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-ag_name, wa_detail-ag_street, wa_detail-ag_city, wa_detail-ag_state,
                            wa_detail-ag_zip, wa_detail-ag_tel)
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
      SELECT SINGLE c~kunnr INTO temp_kunnr
          FROM vbpa AS a
              INNER JOIN lips AS b
                ON b~vgbel = a~vbeln
              INNER JOIN likp AS c
                ON c~vbeln = b~vbeln
                WHERE a~vbeln = wa_detail-vbeln.
      wa_detail-we_num = temp_kunnr.
      SELECT SINGLE name1 name2 stras ort01 regio pstlz telf1
          FROM kna1 INTO (wa_detail-we_name, wa_detail-we_name2, wa_detail-we_street, wa_detail-we_city, wa_detail-we_state,
                            wa_detail-we_zip, wa_detail-we_tel)
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-we_num.
      SELECT SINGLE vkbur FROM knvv INTO wa_detail-vkbur
          WHERE kunnr = wa_detail-kunnr.
      MODIFY it_detail FROM wa_detail.
    ENDLOOP.
    PERFORM display.
    INCLUDE zpartner_displayf01.
    Regards,
    Davis

    Hi Davis,
      The culprit is the select inside the loop.
    YOu should use for all entries instead .
    I will show for one select, you do similar thing for others:
      SELECT addrnumber name1 street city1 region post_code1 tel_number
          FROM adrc INTO table itab_adrc
    for all entries in it_detail
          WHERE addrnumber = it_detail-adrnr.
    sort itab-adrc by addrnumber.
    LOOP AT it_detail INTO wa_detail.
    read table it_adrc with key addrnumber = wa_detail-adrnr.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
    move fiedls of it_adrc into wa_detail.
    endif.
    ENDLOOP.

  • Very slow performance in Lightroom 3??

    I just upgraded to Lightroom  3.0 and I am very suprised how slow it is!?!  I don't have a very large library and I'm on two reasonably new computers yet the difference from Lightroom 2 (snappy performance) to Lightroom 3 (VERY sluggish) is quite suprising..
    I'm using it on a XP and a Vista system with the same results...
    Is anyone else experiencing this???
    Thanks,
    Ken

    I've noticed a slow down in performance with Lightroom 3 as well. As far a looking around the forum for older threads, ...found older lightroom 1 and 2 threads.
    Your Title "Very Slow Performance in Lightroom 3??" fits what I'm looking for just perfectly.
    Jim

  • Very slow performance on my T43

    Hi, my T43 is runnig very slow, it takes a lot of time to open and close web pages and files and the start time is very long. I would appreciate some tips to speed up my laptop.Thanks
    Message Edited by aelairet on 06-23-2008 03:04 AM

    I'm running XP. Won't do Vista. No new fatware if I can help it. I just inherited a broken machine and gonna' put Linux on it.
    FYI,
    The  Prefetch directory was a new one to me just recently. Selecting all and deleting was a definite improvement. ALSO, empty the trash. All those deleted files are still on the hard drive unless they are deleted from the trash directory.
    Defrag is your best friend. Under accessories and system tools is this handy utlitity. I defrag once a month and just makes things run better. If you're into it, set the Virtual memory on your hard drive. Virtual memory is what Windows uses instead of hardware memory. It used to be called the swap file. I always had it set manually but then I let Windows decide how to manage this memory and it didn't work. I very soon ran out of memory. STUPID me. So I set the virtual memory to minimum 1024 and maximum 1024. It's fixed and my T23 is running really smooth.
     And if you are running into these kind of issues but know you have hard drive space left, do all of the above. You and your machine will be very pleased.
    Message Edited by T23FUN on 07-08-2008 01:34 PM
    ThinkPad T23, 2647 HU8, Based on 2647-8RU: PIII-M 1.20GHz (512KB), 512MB RAM, 40.0GB HDD, 14.1 XGA(1024x768) TFT LCD, 8x8x24x/8x CDRW/DVD, Modem(MPCI), Ethernet(CDC), WinXP Home, Linksys Wireless B adapter.

  • I bougnt my S5 a month ago and I am having two major issues.  The screen is very slow to respond.  When the screen is dark and I press the home button, it doesn't come on.  I have to press the button anywhere from 4-10 times and then it usually flashes on

    I bougnt my S5 a month ago and I am having two major issues.  The screen is very slow to respond.  When the screen is dark and I press the home button, it doesn't come on.  I have to press the button anywhere from 4-10 times and then it usually flashes on and back off.  It is very, very frustrating.  The other issue is that the battery drains very quickly.  I have called Verizon numerous times regarding these issues.  They tell me to do different things that never help.  We eventually did a factory reset and it still has the same issues.  Help!  It is a brand new phone and unfortunately I am in a new two year contract.  Ugh. Is there anyone out there who can help me?

    I have done that several times.  In fact, every time I call Verizon with my phone problems, they have me do the same things repeatedly.  I keep telling them I have already done them but they insist they are SURE it will work this time.  It never does.  After doing the factory reset and it still not working correctly, they act like they are confused, almost like I am lying.  I did what you suggested above on the slim chance it would work this time but it did not.  I bought two S5's that day and the other one works perfectly fine.  I know I got a bad phone.  Verizon just does not listen.  It is a bad phone.  I just want a new phone that works properly.  Is that too much to ask?  I bought a new phone that has been bad from day one.  Why oh why do I have to spend hours of my time on the phone, in the store, on the computer, trying to rectify this?  It shouldn't be this difficult!  Help please!!!

  • Linksys E4200V2 - VERY Slow Performance-WIRED, WIRELESS, INTERNET SPEED

    Hi everyone...  I just want to start by saying that I am a very unsatisfied customer! 
    I purchased the Linksys E4200 V2 on 02.06.2012 since this is the latest high end router from Linksys which according to the specs and the reviews this router is supposed to be super mega fast...the box should probably say SUPER MEGA SLOW.
    I called support and after spending two hours on the phone they said that the case will be escalated and that someone will contact me within 48 hrs - It has now been more than 72 hrs and no phone calls or emails have come my way - the router is still not performing.
    The following is my setup:
    HP Quad Core Desktop with Windows 7 x64 bit with 8GB RAM
    Network Card is an integrated 1GBPS card
    I've upgraded all of my ethernet cables to Cat 6  (to see if this made and difference - which it did not)
    LinkSys E4200 V2 router
    Western Digital My Book Duo Live 6TB external drive with ethernet port of 1GBPS
    This weekend I went as far as reinstalling a fresh copy of Windows 7 x64 on a Solid State Hard drive
    My PC is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 cable
    The My Book Duo is connected to the E4200V2 via Cat 6 Cable
    The E4200V2 is connected to my cable modem via Cat 6 Cable
    ISSUES:
    WIRED
    I am getting no more than 20mbs when I copy a 85GB folder from my PC to my external My Book Duo.  I expected to get either 1GBPS speed or at least 400MBs speed since all devices are connected via 1GBPS interfaces and the cables ar Cat 6.  I am using both the native windows copy and paste and I am also using TeraCopy to copy files.
    WIRELESS
    The wireles speed is BAD as well - I am not getting no more than 50MBS with my laptop located just 20 inches from the router.
    CABLE MODEM CONNECTION
    When I run speed tests to the internet I am getting a very slow speed test of 1.5MBS and sometimes I get 20MBS with the E4200V2 router.
    With my OLD Netgear router I get speed tests of 28MBS and never 1.5MBS.

    AndrewGoldy wrote:
    Hi there,
    I've got a very similar problem.
    I've got the Cisco Linksys E4200 (Firmware Version:  1.0.05 build 7 Aug 23, 2012).
    With my previous router, I was able to copy files over the wired network at roughly 11MB/sec (about 100Mbps).
    Now, with the new Linksys router plugged in, with the same cables and pcs, etc, I can only get an average copy rate of 4.4MB/sec - under HALF the speed that I was previously getting - and often sustained slow speeds of roughly 1.8MB/sec
    Any ideas???
    Otherwise I'm returning this router for something else!!!
    I can see that you already have the latest firmware. It might be that the firmware is corrupted. What I can suggest is to reflash the firmware, reset and reconfigure the router. You might as well try to disable WMM.

  • Dragging clips to bins is very slow in Premiere CS6

    I just upgraded to Premiere CS6 from CS 5.5 (no thank you, CC) and have problems with very slow speed when dragging clips from one bin to another in the Project panel. Here are the specifics:
    I have about 1500 clips in a bin that I'm sorting through in the Project panel, putting clips into other bins as I classify them. If I have the 1500 clips sorted by the Name field, there's no delay as I move a clip or clips from the big bin to one of the smaller bins. If, however, I sort the 1500 clips by Media File Path in the Project panel (which puts the clips in chronological order because the file names reflect date and time), then doing the same work results in an 8-second delay every time I try to move a clip between bins.
    I get the 8-second delay each and every time I drag a clip between bins. It occurs whether I select a single clip to drag or drag multiple clips. As soon as I sort in the panel by Name field instead of the Media File Path field, dragging has no delay.
    I have no such trouble with delays in CS5.5, so I'm at a loss. I need to have the bin sorted by Media File Path, because I need them in chronological order as I evaluate them. But an 8-second delay each time I move a clip bogs me down so much it's impractical to get any sorting done.
    I suspect this is a bug. I've upgraded to CS6.05, but that didn't fix it. Does anyone have a workaround?
    Thanks,
    Mike Boom

    A good suggestion. I did try that earlier, but alas, no luck.
    Sorting works across all bins in the Project panel, so once you sort on the Media File Path, drags are slow from all bins, even if you segment into bins as small as two clips.
    Premiere is doing something bad with sorts after CS5.5. Looks like Adobe fell down on regression testing for the updated version. Then again, it's got to be hard to regression test as many features as Premiere has.

  • Fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION very slow performance in bacth job

    Hi all experts!
    Does any one having a problem with slow performance while using the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION and running in batch mode for a big population of data ?
    I have tried to use          
        nocommit         = 'X' as parameter in the fonction HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION
    and calling after each update.
        CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
          EXPORTING
            wait = 'X'.
    And the performance is very long.
    I also remarque that if we run for a small population like less than 500 employees then it finish within 20 mins. But If I ran for a polulation of 5000 employees then it take more than 6 hours = 3600 mins. ?
    Thanks for your answer.
    Hugo Nguyen

    Call Function module 'HR_PSBUFFER_INITIALIZE' After each call to HR_INFOTYPE_OPERATION.
    Refer [link|http://brookshireconsulting.com/technical_update.html] for more information.
    I have tried it my own and it do improve the performance,.
    Hope this improves the performace for you as well.
    Regards
    Shital

  • Very, very slow performance

    Lightroom's performance on my computer has become, at times, intolerably slow.  After rebooting my iMac and not opening any other programs or browsers, it just took about eight minutes to import 23 files, and a few more minutes to build 1:1 previews.  When things are running fine this might take one minute.  (I always build 1:1 previews on import and this happens with recently imported files as well as older ones, so it's not a question of having to build previews on the fly.)  I've had extremely slow performance ("Loading") just moving from one photo to another in the Library and Develop modules or moving from one module to another, typically up to about 90 seconds, or when LR is "preparing the file" for export or edit in PS.  But not always -- sometimes it's quite zippy -- and there's no pattern that I can see.  Generally when this is occurring, memory "pressure" and CPU usage are normal, but it happens when usage is minimal as well.  Occasionally there is a spinning beach ball but not usually. 
    My catalog has about 30k photos and very few presets of any kind.  Probably 75% of these files have never been edited at all.  I don't make hundreds of local adjustment, rarely more than ten in one image.  I have about 40 Smart Collections with an average of several hundred images each.  I rarely use Smart Previews.  I optimize and back up the catalog every time I exit LR, which is a few times a week.  My file/folder structure is simple and clean:  /Pictures/year/day.
    I'm running LR 5.4 on a mid-2011 iMac, 3.4 GHz Intel Core i7, with 16GB of memory.  I have the Lightroom catalog and previews on the main drive, which is a 250GB SSD with about 100GB free.  (Problem happened when my catalog was on different internal drive, too.)  My pictures folder is on an internal drive with over 100GB available.  I have the maximum cache size set to 50GB.  I'm running Mavericks but it was just as slow under Mountain Lion.  It was just as slow in earlier versions of Lightroom, major and minor.  Other programs/apps run just fine on my computer, including Photoshop.  (Generally, LR's performance is the same whether or not PS is running.)  The only performance issue I've noticed since switching to Mavericks is that Finder stalls for several seconds every once in a while.
    I've seen this Lightroom problem referred to on various forums, including Adobe forums, for a long time now -- years -- and I've never seen a definitive fix.  I think I've answered all of the questions that are usually asked.  Is there any solution to this?  I use LR 30-40 hours per week.  I'm tearing my hair out and the option of moving to another program would be the very last resort, but I might have to do that. 

    I don't use your same workflow, and I assume you're shooting RAW. However,  after I have built 1:1 previews in LR (which takes a LONG time), when I click on a file to decide if it's sharp or not, it still takes 5-10 seconds for each file to load. And my computer isn't slow, and I have the same issue on my laptop, which is new and fast. I haven't seen a satisfactory answer to this problem, nor much acknowledgement from Adobe. My files are from a Nikon D7100 with 24 megapixels, so the file size is likely a factor.
    If you are shooting the type of subjects where you use 1:1 previews primarily to determine sharpness, you could consider Photo Mechanic (unfortunately it costs $150) as the first step in your workflow. It uses the embedded jpg files in the RAW file, so it loads 1:1 jpg previews almost instantly. Sports and nature photographers use this product all the time, mostly to delete losers.

Maybe you are looking for