Very stupid claim service policy

I brought ipad2 for 3 months. And used by usual daily without case or other skin norrmally then have some abrasion. After 4 months my ipad2 have been problem about 3G service as shown no sim. I sent to apple service center but they told me cannot claim because my iPad2 have been abrasion scatch.
Oh my god ...... Why they told me like that I just want to fix problem about 3G carrie is not work .Can you fix just a little problem for 4 months ipad2.
But apple center told me can not do that I have to paid more 400 us dollars. Oh man.. Nonsense policy Apple
Ok apple. disappointed for 20 years love your support
Ref Case No 258613164
Chidchanok D.Sophon
Bangkok Thailand Report

Correct ....user to user cause I would like to Warnning to Apple User to knew about this.
Apple Don't care ( Used to be AppleCare)
Your iPad Warrnty will be expired immediately while your iPad have scratched.

Similar Messages

Cisco cat 3560 service-policy output problem

I have just use the 3560 to replace 3550 switchs, but the cat3560 does not support the command "service-policy output" which was supported by 3550,
we have already use this command in 3550 to control the network traffic.
so there somebody knows if there an schedule to implement this command?
Thank you very much.

"service-policy output" is not supported in 3560/3750 due to ASIC limitation. See if "srr-queue bandwidth limit" command will work for you
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225sed/scg/swqos.htm#wp1253412

Fundamental ACL & Service Policy related questions

Hi All,
apologies in advance for seemingly stupid questions but I was forced to ask them as I have ALWAYS had great difficulty in using debug on Cisco platforms. Nothing ever shows up when I set up debug despite configuring "logging console" and setting the level to 7 etc. I have no clue why that is and if it's because all debugging messages go to the debug log instead of being prnted on the console, or what it is...I just don't get it. When I'm saying logging console...please print it on the console! Anyway, that rant aside...
I have a VERY simple topology like so
A few servers in this VLAN
ISP <---> 3560G (Physical Routed Port) <--> SVI (VLAN)
ASA5520 <--> Internal VLAN
With regards to ACLs and their direction, when an ACL is applied to a physical port (or in cases where QoS is enabled and a service-policy) is applied to either a routed physical port on the 3560, saying that the policy is applied in the "in" direction (or 'input' in case of service-policy) does that mean 'inbound' in either direction? As in IF that routed port is my direct connection to the ISP, and I set up "ip access-group myacl in" (or service-policy input myPolicymap) ...will that be applicable if the traffic enters that port from the ISP side OR from the internal network side, or "IN" for it is always JUST the ISP side because it's assuming that all traffic generated from inside the network going out to the Internet is implcitly allowed UNLESS an ACL somewhere in the network restricts that?
then, in case of an SVI...I believe just like the physical routed port, I can ONLY implement an "Inbound" ACL on this as well. So when I implement either a Heirarchical policy-map or just an access-group "in", then what is "IN" ...traffic entering this VLAN from the internal network and those public servers going out to the Internet AND Traffic entering this VLAN from the ISP/Internet via the physical routed Port OR is it JUST the latter, or is it just the former?
Now Lastly, when I have the physical ports to which the ASA and each of those physical servers are connected to sitting on the public VLAN, if I apply port-based ACLs or service-policies to them, then again, what direction is the "IN" ACL applied? Both? i.e. traffic coming into it from the public servers and the Internal network through the ASA, and the Internet OR just the traffic coming into it from the Internet, but the traffic going out from the servers to the Internet is not subjected to this ACL or service-policy
Again, very sorry for a dumb question but I'm seeing bizzare things in my network so was just wondering before I decide on what kind of security I want to plan/design
Thanks in advance

The mystical difference between debug output going to the console versus showing up in syslog is "logging debug-trace". On goes to syslog, "no logging debug-trace" goes to console. I've been bit by this one myself.
ACLs on physical ports have directionality like the cable plug: "in" is from the cable entering into the switch or firewall, "out" is leaving the device to run along the cable to somewhere else. On Catalyst switches port ACLs are inbound (receiving packets) only. Obviously, on directly connected devices, one devices out is the other devices in.
ACLs on SVI's depend on whether your are running a base image or services image; services images can do IPv4 and IPv6 in both directions. However, port ACL's trump routed ACL's; if both exist, the port ACL is the only one applied. I think if a directly connected port has no port ACL, no ACL is applied at all; routed ACL's on SVI's only apply to transitions between VLANs inside the switch, not to traffic entering physical ports.
-- Jim Leinweber, WI State Lab of Hygiene

OWSM user name token service policy for a proxy service at OSB

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while trying for the OWSM user name token service policy Authentication for a proxy service at OSB. I am using the PS4 SOA suite with AIA foundation pack. very first I am login into the EM console and choose the domain<soaosb_domain> form web logic domain I moved to security->security provide configuration. Inside the security provide configuration we have to key store section and I expand that and we have a configure button inside the keys tore. I click that button and it open a new page. In that page I got the Java key store (JKS) as the default key store and in the access Attributes I keep the default key store path and fill password and confirm password fields. Then in Identity certificates I fill the signature key and Encryption key with key Alias as 'orakey' and same password which I am mentioned at access Attributes. I got the message like the key store is created successfully. Then I restarted the server and again I am login into the EM console and choose the domain<soaosb_domain> form web logic domain I moved to security. In security I choose the credentials. In credentials we have create key. In the create key I add the key as hari-key and provide the hari as a user and his password.
While trying to test the proxy service i am getting the [OSB Security - OWSM: 387253] Failed to initialize OWSM Credential Manager. Please validate the Key store Configuration.
can anyone please look at this and suggest me how can I proceed for this.
Thanks
Hari

anyone please respond to the above request.
Thanks
Hari

ACE - incomplete 'sh service-policy NAME detail' listing

Hi guys,
our customer reported to me problem with incomplete 'sh service-policy CLIENT_VIP detail' listing. this listing is not complete and ends with 'Unexpected header: 0'.
he reported, that (for example) 25 policy maps in policy-map multi-match working correctly and listing is complete, but more policy maps in the policy-map multi-match cause incomplete listing and this extra policy maps are not working properly.
I tried copy his config file to my ACE, and service policy listing is complete.
any ideas? maybe no more resources for this context (I got no 'sh resource usage' from the customer till now).
ACE SW: 3.0(0)A1(5a)
config has 39 class maps in the class-map multi-match CLIENT_VIP definition
thanks,
martin

I forgot... customer reported behavior, that is very important:
Primary problem is, that removed class from policy-class multi-match is still working (!) and new added class is not working. configuration is ok, because without too many classes in policy-map multi-match are this config parts operational.
is this known defect?
resources usage is without problem.
martin

Service policy counters not working..

I have a service policy on a 6509 interface so I can see what the packets per second of a video stream coming out of a DVR (digital video recorder) is. This DVR has 16 security cameras attached and I'm concerned that when someone views all 16 cameras the video stream is going to be huge.
So I create a service policy to match an access list for all IP from the DVR. But no counters increment unless I add in some other match statement. I added in a match protocol telnet and the service policy counters started to work. I removed the match on telnet and the counters stopped. Telnet has nothing to do with the DVR. Here is the config of the class map, policy map and show commands: (By the way video is streaming through this interface continually during this excercise)
MATCHING ACCESS LIST ONLY:
class-map match-any DVR
match access-group 130
policy-map DVR-test
class DVR
ROC-6509-DU-A#sh access-list 130
Extended IP access list 130
10 permit ip host 164.72.2.125 any
ROC-6509-DU-A#sh policy-map int
GigabitEthernet2/5
Service-policy output: DVR-test
Class-map: DVR (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
30 second offered rate 0 bps
Match: access-group 130
0 packets, 0 bytes
30 second rate 0 bps
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
0 packets, 0 bytes
30 second offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
ADDING IN TELNET:
class-map match-any DVR
match access-group 130
match protocol telnet
policy-map DVR-test
class DVR
ROC-6509-DU-A#sh policy-map int
GigabitEthernet2/5
Service-policy output: DVR-test
Class-map: DVR (match-any)
524025 packets, 70724866 bytes
30 second offered rate 3991000 bps
Match: access-group 130
523896 packets, 70689220 bytes
30 second rate 3991000 bps
Match: protocol telnet
129 packets, 35646 bytes
30 second rate 0 bps
Class-map: class-default (match-any)
18696 packets, 11180265 bytes
30 second offered rate 129000 bps, drop rate 0 bps
Match: any
If I remove the 'match protocol telnet' and clear the counters, no longer do the counters for the access-list 130 increment - put back in match telnet and they start to increment.
This is a Sup720 with IOS 12.2(18)SXE3
Is this a bug or do I not have my class map or policy map correct?

The hardware ASICs do not support collecting the individual policer information.
Try:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/c3550/1216ea1/3550scg/swqos.htm#xtocid1990743

Error while applying the Service Policy

Hi,
I am getting the below error while applying the service policy to the Interface.
I have set the mpls exp 4 as well as want to limit the bandwidth to 1Mbps
PE#sh policy-map setexp-GBoIP
Policy Map setexp-GBoIP
    Class GBoIP-traffic
      set mpls experimental imposition 4
     police cir 1024000 bc 32000
       conform-action transmit
       exceed-action drop
PE(config-if)#int vlan 2007
PE(config-if)#service-policy input setexp-GBoIP
QoS-ERROR: Addition/Modification made to policymap setexp-GBoIP and class GBoIP-traffic is not valid, command is rejected
As well as I have created new clas--map with priority and Bandwidth and applied in output direction, I got the belwo error while applying the Service policy in
PE(config-if)#service-policy out TEST
bandwidth command is not supported in output direction for this interface
PE(config-if)#service-policy output TEST
priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface
Any idea why so ?
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Nilesh

Check the current value of IGW_AWARDS_S sequence and make sure the MINVALUE in the patch (i.e. 10000) is not greater than the current one.
OERR: ORA 4007 MINVALUE cannot be made to exceed the current value (Doc ID 19824.1)
You may also log a SR.
Thanks,
Hussein

Why doesn't "show service-policy url-summary" work?

Does any one know -- At Cisco Live this year -- this command was shown as an Option to see the number of
hits on L7 class maps urls.
It's not an option for me: Running A3 (2.5)
Thanks,
From A2 documentation (maybe this command was dropped from A3 -- but that would be unfortunate)
To display the statistics for all policy maps or a specific policy map that is currently in service, use the show service-policy command. This command also allows you to display statistics for a specific class map in a policy or the hit counts for match HTTP URL statements in a Layer 7 HTTP policy map. If you do not enter an option with this command, the ACE displays all enabled policy statistics.
show service-policy [policy_name [class-map class_name]] [detail | summary | url-summary] [|] [>]
Syntax Description
policy_name
(Optional) Identifier of an existing policy map that is currently in service (applied to an interface) as an unquoted text string with a maximum of 64 alphanumeric characters. If you do not enter the name of an existing policy map, the ACE displays information and statistics for all policy maps.
class-map class_name
(Optional) Displays the statistics for the specified class map associated with the policy.
detail
(Optional) Displays a more detailed listing of policy map or class map statistics and status information.
summary
(Optional) Displays a summary of policy map or class map statistics and status information.
url-summary
(Optional) Displays the number of times that a connection is established based on a match HTTP URL statement for a class map in a Layer 7 HTTP policy map.
The URL hit counter is per match statement per load-balancing Layer 7 policy. If you are using the same combination of Layer 7 policy and class maps with URL match statements in different VIPs, the count is combined. If the ACE configuration exceeds 64K URL and load-balancing policy combinations, this counter displays NA.

Hi Dan,
The url-summary has only been added to the ACE module code at this time. The A2 code train is only for the module, while the A3 train is only for the appliance. The good news is that later this year, we will have a new software coming out (A4) that will be the exact same image that can be loaded on either the module or the appliance, hence all functionality will be the same for both (except the acceleration and optimization that only the appliance will support.
Hope this helps,
Sean

Why is the signal at my home so much weaker than when I moved here in February 2013? I only get one or two bars and very poor data service if any at all.

Why is the signal at my home so much weaker than it was when I moved here in February 2013? I get only one or two bars and very poor data service if any at all. Calling to ask the question results in a vortex of questions that have little to do with the problem and no resolution or answer.

I have a Droid Ultra phone. The signal reduction seems to only be in the general area of my home. If I go downtown, the signal improves to what it once was at home. Everything at my home is as it was when the signal was good, including cable TV service. There has been no new construction in the area that I know of.
Thanks for trying to resolve the issue. Just this morning while trying to view web pages, I found that I could not load any.
Ron

Policy map/ class map/ service policy for IOS xr

Hi,
I need to create a policy map and class map/service policy to limit the amount of bandwidth that can be used on one interface both in and out.
I need the cap for the bandwidth to traverse this circuit to ne 10 Meg.
the IOS xr version we are using is 4.3.4
I was hoping someone could help me out by giving me a configuration example I could follow.
Thank you.

for instance like this:
policy-map police-in
class class-default
police rate 10 mpbs <optionally set burst>
policy-map shape-out-parent
class class-default
shape 10 mpbs <optional burst config>
service-policy shape-out-child
policy-map shape-out-child
class class-default
queue-limit 10 packets
int g 0/0/0/0
service-policy police-in in
service-policy shape-out-parent out
also have a look at CL 2013/2014 (orlando/sanfran) ID 2904 for more QOS details
and the support forum article of "asr9000 quality of service architecture"
xander

Can't apply service-policy to atm int?

Attempted to apply service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS to ATM Int:
class-map match-any GOLD
match mpls experimental topmost 5
match ip precedence 5
class-map match-any BRONZE
match mpls experimental topmost 3
match ip precedence 3
class-map match-any SILVER
match mpls experimental topmost 4
match ip precedence 4
policy-map MPLS-EGRESS
class GOLD
priority percent 5
set mpls experimental topmost 5
class SILVER
bandwidth percent 10
random-detect
set mpls experimental topmost 4
class BRONZE
bandwidth percent 20
random-detect
set mpls experimental topmost 3
class class-default
set mpls experimental topmost 0
fair-queue
random-detect
interface ATM4/0.102 point-to-point
description TRUNK LINK TO PE_B
bandwidth 16000
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.252
no ip redirects
no ip proxy-arp
ip ospf message-digest-key xxx
no snmp trap link-status
mpls ip
pvc PE_B 10/102
tx-ring-limit 3
oam-pvc manage
encapsulation aal5snap
service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS
And it *appears* to apply without error, but logs show:
Jul 28 09:34:32.550 aest: %SCHED-3-SEMLOCKED: Virtual Exec attempted to lock a semaphore, already locked by itself -Traceback= 0x61317864 0x62658A88 0x620F0A4C 0x60DD3668 0x60DD5648 0x6135ABD8 0x61379744 0x62644508 0x626444EC
Jul 28 09:34:33.870 aest: I/f ATM4/0.102 VC 10/102 class GOLD requested bandwidth 0 (kbps), available only 0 (kbps)
And ATM4/0.102 does not include the service-policy output MPLS-EGRESS when I do a show run nor when I do a sho policy-map interface?

Resolved my own issue - I needed:
vbr-nrt 32000 16000
under the atm sub int...

Service Policy won't attach to interface - NO error

Hi,
Am doing some simple CE VoIP QoS for a IPSEC/GRE Customer. I try to ATTACH the policy to the tunnel outbound and the command is accepted without any error but nothing appears in the config.
Here's the base config:
class-map match-all IPSEC-VPN
match access-group name IKE_ACL
class-map match-all ROUTING
match ip dscp cs6
class-map match-all NETWORK-MANAGEMENT
match ip dscp cs2
class-map match-any VOICE-SIGNAL
match protocol rtp
match ip precedence 3
match ip dscp cs3
match ip dscp af31
match ip dscp af32
class-map match-any VOICE-BEARER
match ip precedence 5
match ip dscp ef
match ip dscp cs5
policy-map SHAPE-ADSL-UPLINK
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 50
random-detect
random-detect ecn
policy-map VoIP-QoS
class VOICE-BEARER
priority percent 34
class VOICE-SIGNAL
bandwidth percent 5
class ROUTING
bandwidth percent 2
class NETWORK-MANAGEMENT
bandwidth percent 2
class IPSEC-VPN
bandwidth percent 2
class class-default
(config)# int t203
(config-if)#service-policy output SHAPE-ADSL-UPLINK
NOTHING appears in the config and sh policy-map int t100 shows an unapplied policy.
Using:
c836-k9o3s8y6-mz.123-8.T5
Another bug?
Thx

Policy should read (nested):
policy-map SHAPE-ADSL-UPLINK
class class-default
bandwidth remaining percent 50
random-detect
random-detect ecn
service-policy VoIP-QoS

Service-policy output not working in Cisco 3560 switch

We got some Cisco catalyst 3560 that we want to control the bandwidth
on the ports. Can this be done, and how do i do it?
Ive got 3550s that can do policy-map with the interface command;
service-policy output(and input) <policyname>
But 3560 only seems to handle service-policy input.
If i try to configure output, it says the following:
SW(config-if)#service-policy output 4mbit-out
police command is not supported for this interface
Configuration failed!
Warning: Assigning a policy map to the output side of an interface not
supported
Any workarounds or new ways to accomplish bandwith-control on a 3560 ?
regards,
Rajib

The 3560 & 3750 (& 2960) don't support egress policy-maps. They do however support queueing so it is possible to achieve similar results by applying an ingress policer to your user ports to classify (& police?) the traffic, at the egress port you can then queue the traffic based on it's DSCP or CoS value that it was classified with (same as 3550).
It is also possible to restrict the bandwidth in use at an egress port with the interface command 'srr-queue bandwidth limit <10-90>' where 10-90 represents a percentage of the links bandwidth. For example if you want to restrict a 100Mbps port to 10Mbps you would use the command 'srr-queue bandwidth limit 10'
HTH
Andy

Very bad customer service!

I am a photographer and in June 2013 I decided to join the newly launched Creative Cloud single application subscription program for Photoshop CC.
At the same time I purchased a Lightroom standard license (Lightroom was not available on the Creative Cloud at that time).
The monthly price for Photoshop CC with a one year commitment was 24,59 Eur for Europe (I live in Czech Republic). I didn’t quite understand how that translates from the 19,99 USD of the US subscription, but fair enough Adobe is not a charity and they have the right to decide to charge what they want for their products. Plus the subscription prices were clearly showed on their website, so I decided to join anyway.
Honestly I was very happy both with Photoshop and Lightroom and I think they are two fantastic pieces of software so I didn’t mind the price I paid for them.
Then a few months after I get a call from my bank saying that my card has been blocked because it might have been compromised following some online payments I made. And after a little research I find out that (citing the Adobe website) “Very recently, Adobe’s security team discovered sophisticated attacks on our network, involving the illegal access of customer information as well as source code for numerous Adobe products. We believe these attacks may be related.
Our investigation currently indicates that the attackers accessed Adobe customer IDs and encrypted passwords on our systems. We also believe the attackers removed from our systems certain information relating to 2.9 million Adobe customers, including customer names, encrypted credit or debit card numbers, expiration dates, and other information relating to customer orders.
Great, now I am for two weeks without card while my bank gets me a new one (they are not that fast in Czech Republic).
Fortunately I also read online that (citing the Adobe website) ”Adobe is also offering customers, whose credit or debit card information was involved, the option of enrolling in a one-year complimentary credit monitoring membership where available.”.
Honestly I misunderstood that as a one year complimentary Creative Cloud membership and I thought that was very nice of Adobe, they didn’t have to do it, and to me it showed an effort to say “we are sorry” and to try to retain their customers’ trust.
Some time passes and I am obviously still getting charged monthly for my subscription.
So I contact Adobe through the online chat…..turns out that I am not eligible for the one year complimentary subscription (none of the agents actually explained to me that I had misunderstood the offer) but after a bit of complaining and waiting online I get offered a one month complimentary subscription!?!?!.
You can make up your own mind on how to interpret that but to me that meant that Adobe recognized their responsibility but tried everything possible to get rid of me with the minimum possible.
The guy on the chat however said that if I am not satisfied I can ask him to escalate.
I do so and he tells me that I will be contacted within 2-3 business days.
A week after I have not been contacted yet, so I call the support again and I am told that they are very sorry for not getting back to me and I will be (again) contacted within 2-3 business days.
TWO weeks after that chat I finally get a mail from Adobe, which is now offering me 2 months complimentary subscription.
I realize I better take what they give me so I reluctantly accept.
Not even a week after that, I realized that Adobe launched a new Photoshop Photography program where they give the Photoshop CC license + Lightroom 5 for 9.99 USD or 12.29 Eur with a yearly commitment. This is half what I pay now, not even considering the one off Lightroom 5 license that I already paid (129.15 Eur). The special offer expires on the 2nd December (less than a week from now at the time of writing this).
The good news is that existing CC subscribers can ask to transfer to this program for free.
So I contact the Adobe support again and they happily confirm that I can switch to the new program.
BUT I would lose the 2 free months as they cannot be transferred to the new program because it is already discounted.
I spend a good deal of effort explaining that the 2 free months are not a discount but are a compensation for me being without card for 2 weeks so I should be able to retain them, but the support person on the other side of the chat just politely dismisses every argument.
I understand that Adobe did not have to allow existing subscriptions to transfer to the new offer for free, I purchased a service and then a few months after the price went down, fair enough this happens.
If the price went up on the other end I would have still kept my original price.
However what infuriates me is that since any existing subscriber can join the cheaper offer, Adobe has actually penalized me in front of all the other customers and the reason why they have penalized me is that my data have been compromised on their servers.
You draw your own conclusions but to me this is very bad customer service.

This is the transcript of the conversation I had with your colleague over the support chat, then unfortunately my connection dropped and I lost him:
Saka: Hi Francesco.
Francesco: Hello
Saka: I have received your initial question. I'll be glad to check and help you with this.
Francesco: thank you
Saka: Sorry for the wait. Please do stay online.
Francesco: ok
Saka: Francesco, I have checked and see that we have issued 2 months free for the subscription Nov 21, 2013. Your next billing date is on 27.2.2014.
Francesco: but I have already been billed on 02.12
Saka: I'll be right with you.
Saka: Are you referring to Clenství ve službe Creative Cloud s jednou aplikací pro Photoshop (rocní) or Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novejší)?
Francesco: the first one should have been canceled, the second one has been activated
Francesco: with the 2 months free of charge added to it
Saka: Yes, the first subscription has been cancelled.
Francesco: I have been bulled only 12.29 Eur so it is for the second subscription
Francesco: the first one was 24.99 Eur I think
Saka: Yes, you have been charged € 12,29 for the new order Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novejší).
Saka: You can continue using the subscription without any issues.
Francesco: so where are the 2 months free of charge?
Saka: We have provided 2 months for your Clenství ve službe Creative Cloud s jednou aplikací pro Photoshop (rocní).
Francesco: those have been transferred on the Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novejší)
Francesco: as confirmed by your colleague and by the mail I received
Francesco: This is the mail confirmation
Francesco: Užívejte si našich služeb o něco déle Bezplatně jsme prodloužili vaše předplatné produktu Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novější) o několik dalších dnů (62). Nové datum pro obnovu předplatného je nyní 26-únor-2014 (PT). Děkujeme, že jste si předplatili náš produkt! Tým služby Creative Cloud
Francesco: Which confirms that the next billing date for Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novější) is 26/2/2014
Saka: Francesco, we have provided 2 months free only if you are willing to continue subscription till the commitment date. The order gets cancelled since you have purchased for Program na úpravu fotografií Photoshop (Pro vlastníky licence k produktu CS3 a novejší) at lower rate.

Command "service-policy input policy-name permit-any" will not work

Hi all,
have a SG500 with latest Firmware, but this command will not work.
service-policy input QoS_01 permit-any
i get this error message:
% Wrong number of parameters or invalid range, size or characters entered
without the option "permit-any or deny-any" the command is successfully.
What is the reason?
It is important, directly to specify this options. Otherwise to lose the access to the switch.
Regards
Stefan

Hi Tom,
i have a ACL / ACE and create a QoS "policy table" put the "policy class map" (with class mappings) in it.
And now i will bind this QoS policy to a Ethernet port.
cli tutorial example say:
Use the service-policy Interface Configuration (Ethernet, Port-channel) mode command to bind a policy map to a port/port-channel. Use the no form of this command to detach a policy map from an interface.
This command is only available in QoS advanced mode.
Syntax
service-policy input policy-map-name default-action [permit-any | deny-any]
no service-policy input
Example:
witchxxxxxx(config-if)# service-policy input policy1 permit-any
A cisco support open a ticket for me.
-Stefan

Very stupid claim service policy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for