[VIA] highest cpu/fsb support

I have an MSI mobo - KT4V (MS-6712) VIA KT400 chipset based
I would like to know what is the fastest cpu/fsb that can be used with this mobo.
I dont want to buy the wrong chip and have to return it because it wont work
Some help PLEASE!!!
I THANK YOU NOW FOR ANY INPUT
P.S. KT4V is written on the box - KT4V-L is written on the sticker with the bar code thats on the box

Hi
Here is a link to the MSI site about your motherboard. You can use up to an Athlon 3200+ providing it has a 333fsb. They are fairly hard to find. As long as the cpu does not have a 400fsb, you are ok.
The -L at the end indicates that it has onboard lan.
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=620

Similar Messages

Setting BIOS CPU FSB clock to 333

Hello everyone,
I recently acquired the K7N2-Delta ILSR (MS-6570) motherboard; nVIDIA Next GF2 400 FSB DDR. The CPU is an Athlon XP 2500 1.85 GHZ, 333 MHz.
The mainboard specs states the Socket A (Socket - 462) supports AMD Athlon XP processors @ FSB 266/333/400. I have the jumper J11 on the board set to 'short'.
With all that said, I've tried adjusting the CPU FSB Clock Frequency to 333 in the BIOS Setup Utility yet 200 is the highest option it gives. Does the CPU Interface have to be set to 'High Performance'? Other adjustments necessary?
Thanks for any feedback!

200 mhz fsb is the correct setting, DDR is just that "double data rate" so 200 x 2 = 400 mhz
MikeB

KT3 Ultra2-C FSB support?

About 13 months ago I purchased a prebuilt PC system and made the mistake of assuming (based on the name) that the KT3 Ultra2-C (MS-6593) was similar to the rest of the KT3 Ultra2 line, which I had heard good things about, and I expected similar future processor support. In fact if you do a Google search you will dig up some old news releases that even state that MS-6593 supports Barton CPUs. Flash forward in time, and I discover that despite the extremely similar name, the Ultra2-C apparently does not support the newer 333 FSB CPUs. A search on this site comes up with some posts that say this is because the Ultra2-C doesn't even have the 1/5 divider, so the PCI speeds at 166 will be far out of spec.
Can anyone confirm if they have gotten Bartons to work with this motherboard? Or otherwise confirm if this board is in fact lacking a 1/5 divider at 166 FSB? Can this be fixed with a BIOS update?
The BIOS allows one to set a CPU FSB up to 200 mhz, and the board came with overclocking utilities, etc. Speaking as an engineer myself, it is completely illogical to make a product that supports high FSB but does not have a 1/5 DIVIDER at 166! I also can't believe a company would release a product with such a similar name yet have such critical differences in features.
Signed,
Confused and Disappointed

Yepp, it does not have the 1/5 divider, similar to the KT3 Ultra-ARU. But the Ultra-ARU is often reportet to run at FSB166, but it is not official
CPU list:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_cpu_support_detail.php?UID=357
misc page:
http://www.msi.com.tw/program/products/mainboard/mbd/pro_mbd_detail.php?UID=357
greetz sj

Question about CPU FSB and K7N2-L

This is probably a nub question, but here goes anyway:
I currently have an 1800 XP Palomino processor which supports 266mhz fsb. I just installed this board with this processor and left all the jumpers at default. After reading the manual it says I should short jumper J11 (133/166mhz) on the mobo, and make the appropriate settings in the bios to achieve 266mhz for the cpu fsb. Now, I know it says this in the manual, but I thought I'd better make sure that this is the right procedure before I go ahead and do it so I don't screw anything up.
If anyone could help me out on this it would be greatly appreciated.
TIA

Cheers... it's interesting how many people make that mobo/RAM choice. I use a K7N2G-L with Crucial PC2700 DDR (2x256) and it works fine. Kudos on reading the manual, frequently it has the answers you're looking for. You're correct... make sure J10 (FSB Mode Jumper-133MHz position) and J11 (FSB Frequency Jumper-133/166 position) are set correctly, BIOS settings on the "Advanced Chipset Features" page are correct for your processor/RAM, and you should be all set. There is a good article on driver loading order (by liquidsoul) on the http://www.amdforums.com site... look under "MSI Motherboards".

Diamond Plus; Cell Menu CPU FSB Set at 250 x11 but Board Running 200.9 x14

I have FSB set at 250 with the CPU multiplier set at x11. Memory is set at an FSB / DRAM ratio of 1:1. The memory modules are in slots 1 and 2 (green / purple). While in the BIOS Cell Menu it is reporting Memory frequency at DDR500 and the CPU at a slight underclock. This agrees with the above settings. However, in BIOS / Standard CMOS Features / CPU Configuration, it shows the CPU running at 2816Mhz with a multiplier of x14. This is equal to the settings (200.9 x14) that are applied when "Load Optimized Defaults" is loaded and saved. All of the settings in the rest of BIOS setup are definitely set to Manual and the setting values as noted in the first sentence.
CPUZ is also reporting a FSB of 200 with a multiplier of x14. It's showing the memory as PC3200 and running at DDR400 which makes sense if FSB is really running at 200. Long story short, it's reporting everything at the stock settings as set by "Load Optimized Defaults". It is correctly showing the memory in dual channel and the command address rate at 1T. This is the latest version of CPUZ. I had an older version saved on CD. I tried this old version and it reported the same thing.
I have all of the dynamic overclocking options, wakeup options, cool n' quiet and automatic fan speed controls (except northbridge) disabled. If there's any other options that could throttle down the CPU I sure couldn't find them. Even if there were, my CPU is running atb 39C at idle so it shouldn't kick in any thermal throttling. When I flashed to the version 1.19 BIOS version at MSI Tech Support's direction to solve the "phantom modem" issue, I took the extreme route to clearing CMOS; powered down, removed or disconnected all the components, pressed the clear CMOS button, removed the battery for 30 minutes, pressed the clear CMOS button again, reinserted the battery, pressed the clear CMOS button yet again, reinstalled / reconnected the minimum required components, flashed the BIOS, cleared CMOS again, cleared nvram, loaded optimized defaults and saved, manually adjusted all the settings, reinstalled / reconnected the remaining components.
I'm at a loss to explain this. MSI Tech Support says they can't help me because this involves overclocking and they're not allowed to provide advice.
Anyone have any ideas as to what could be causing this?
Thanks in advance for any help provided.

I've been experimenting with different combinations of FSB / Multipliers / Memory dividers. My best performance is with the CPU at 250 x12 for 3.0 GHz, and memory still at 3-3-2-8, 1:1 and 1T. This is all at stock voltages and I'm not willing to risk frying anything by raising it even a little bit. It's running fast, smooth and cool. That's all I'm looking for so that's as far as I'm going to take it.
Here are a few reports from Everest:
OC:
CPU Properties:
CPU Type AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
CPU Alias San Diego S939
CPU Stepping SH-E4
CPUID CPU Name AMD Athlon(tm) 64 FX-57 Processor
CPUID Revision 00020F71h
CPU Speed:
CPU Clock 3000.0 MHz (original: 2800 MHz, overclock: 7%)
CPU Multiplier 12.0x
CPU FSB 250.0 MHz (original: 200 MHz, overclock: 25%)
Memory Bus 250.0 MHz
DRAM:FSB Ratio CPU/12
Chipset Properties:
Motherboard Chipset nVIDIA nForce4 SLI X16, AMD Hammer
Memory Timings 3-3-2-8 (CL-RCD-RP-RAS)
Command Rate (CR) 1T
SPD Memory Modules:
DIMM1: Muskin 991492 1 GB PC3200 DDR SDRAM (3.0-3-2-8 @ 200 MHz)
DIMM2: Muskin 991492 1 GB PC3200 DDR SDRAM (3.0-3-2-8 @ 200 MHz)
BIOS Properties:
System BIOS Date 03/21/06
Video BIOS Date 06/24/04
DMI BIOS Version 080012
Graphics Processor Properties:
Video Adapter nVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX
GPU Code Name G70GTX (PCI Express x16 10DE / 0091, Rev A1)
GPU Clock (Geometric Domain) 275 MHz
GPU Clock (Shader Domain) 275 MHz
GPU Clock (ROP Domain) 275 MHz
Idle:
Sensor Properties:
Sensor Type Winbond W83627EHF/EHG (ISA A10h)
GPU Sensor Type Analog Devices ADT7473 (NV-I2C 2Eh)
Chassis Intrusion Detected Yes
Temperatures:
Motherboard 35 °C (95 °F)
CPU 32 °C (90 °F)
Aux 39 °C (102 °F)
GPU1: GPU 35 °C (95 °F)
GPU1: GPU Diode 43 °C (109 °F)
GPU1: GPU Ambient 37 °C (99 °F)
GPU2: GPU 30 °C (86 °F)
GPU2: GPU Diode 42 °C (108 °F)
GPU2: GPU Ambient 34 °C (93 °F)
Cooling Fans:
CPU 6027 RPM
Voltage Values:
CPU Core 1.41 V
Aux 2.98 V
+3.3 V 3.30 V
+5 V 5.54 V
+12 V 12.46 V
+5 V Standby 4.92 V
VBAT Battery 3.01 V
GPU1: GPU Vcc 3.26 V
GPU2: GPU Vcc 3.26 V
Load (Prime95):
Sensor Properties:
Sensor Type Winbond W83627EHF/EHG (ISA A10h)
GPU Sensor Type Analog Devices ADT7473 (NV-I2C 2Eh)
Chassis Intrusion Detected Yes
Temperatures:
Motherboard 37 °C (99 °F)
CPU 49 °C (120 °F)
Aux 40 °C (104 °F)
GPU1: GPU 35 °C (95 °F)
GPU1: GPU Diode 43 °C (109 °F)
GPU1: GPU Ambient 38 °C (100 °F)
GPU2: GPU 30 °C (86 °F)
GPU2: GPU Diode 42 °C (108 °F)
GPU2: GPU Ambient 34 °C (93 °F)
Cooling Fans:
CPU 5819 RPM
Voltage Values:
CPU Core 1.45 V
Aux 2.98 V
+3.3 V 3.28 V
+5 V 5.54 V
+12 V 12.46 V
+5 V Standby 4.92 V
VBAT Battery 2.98 V
GPU1: GPU Vcc 3.25 V
GPU2: GPU Vcc 3.26 V
I'm getting the same anomaly with the value for CPU Fan. That's the chipset fan speed for sure. It matches the BIOS reading and it's the only fan I have plugged into the mainboard. Everything else is running from a rheobus.
The NB temp on this mainboard is really exceptional. The NB on my old DFI SLI-DR routinely ran in the 48-49C range. I guess the MSI cooling solution is pretty efficient. One other thing though, I'm using Arctic Silencers on both of my graphics boards. The intake fan on the "slave" board is directly above one of the chipsets. That may be drawing an additional bit of heat off of the chipset.
As far as the voltage values, I'm getting the same skew with a different mainboard, BIOS and PSU so this looks like an Everest issue.
IMHO, if your machine isn't doing flakey things that can't be attributed to anything else then your PSU is adequate. If you do go with the Diamond Plus and SLI, I would suggest upgrading the PSU. It seems that the 1 kilowatt PSU's are all the rage now but in reality 700W is more than adequate. Adjustable potentiometers must be nice if you know what you're doing with them. I don't so I don't bother looking for that feature.
Hope this is helpful or at least of some interest.

Awr show this sql as highest cpu consuming sql .Is this sql need tunning?

Hi,
As awr reports showing this sql as the highest CPU consumer
Please consider me newbie and help me to understand this.
Thanking you ..
SQL ordered by CPU Time            DB/Inst: Snaps:
-> Resources reported for PL/SQL code includes the resources used by all SQL
   statements called by the code.
-> % Total DB Time is the Elapsed Time of the SQL statement divided
   into the Total Database Time multiplied by 100
    CPU      Elapsed                  CPU per % Total
Time (s)   Time (s) Executions     Exec (s) DB Time    SQL Id
     2,658      2,665            1     2658.18     5.7 5aawbyzqjk8by
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, ta
s_site ts where trp.tsa_id = tti.tsa_id and tti.status = 1 and ts.site_id = trp
.site_id and (tti.max_install != trp.pushed_rsn and ((tti.max_install = 0 and
(trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :1) or (tti.max_installComplete sql =>
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, tas_site
ts
where
trp.tsa_id = tti.tsa_id
and tti.status = 1
and ts.site_id = trp.site_id
and
tti.max_install != trp.pushed_rsn
and (
       (tti.max_install = 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :1
       ) or
       (tti.max_install > 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :2
       ) or
       (tti.max_install = trp.pushed_rsn and
       tti.max_install <> 0
) or
(trp.pushed_time !=
to_date(tti.created_date,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * ts.workahead_time
) and
to_date(sysdate,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * :3
) > trp.pushed_time
)getting the explain plan for the above sql =>
QL> SELECT plan_table_output FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR('g6c8y31xr06vp',0,'ALL'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID g6c8y31xr06vp, child number 0
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, tas_site
ts where trp.tsa_id = tti.tsa_id and tti.status = 1 and ts.site_id = trp.site_id and
(tti.max_install != trp.pushed_rsn and ((tti.max_install = 0 and (trp.pushed_rsn -
trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :1) or (tti.max_install > 0 and (trp.pushed_rsn -
trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :2) or   (tti.max_install = trp.pushed_rsn and
tti.max_install <> 0 ) )) or (trp.pushed_time != (to_date(tti.created_date,'dd-MON-yy
hh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * ts.workahead_time) and ((to_date(sysdate,'dd-MON-yy
hh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * :3) > trp.pushed_time))
Plan hash value: 2862358316
| Id | Operation               | Name                 | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT        |                      |       |       |   601K(100)|          |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE            |                      |     4 |   216 |   601K (10)| 02:00:14 |
|   2 |   CONCATENATION         |                      |       |       |            |          |
|   3 |    NESTED LOOPS         |                      |   200M|    10G|   579K (6)| 01:55:52 |
|   4 |     MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN|                      | 2849 | 99715 |    12   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAS_SITE             |     7 |    70 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |      BUFFER SORT        |                      |   407 | 10175 |     9   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAS_RECEIPTS_PROCESS |   407 | 10175 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL   | TAS_TSA_INFO         | 70411 | 1306K|   203   (6)| 00:00:03 |
|* 9 |    HASH JOIN            |                      |     2 |   108 |   203   (2)| 00:00:03 |
|* 10 |     HASH JOIN           |                      |   407 | 14245 |     7 (15)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAS_SITE             |     7 |    70 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL | TAS_RECEIPTS_PROCESS |   407 | 10175 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL   | TAS_TSA_INFO         | 21474 |   398K|   196   (2)| 00:00:03 |
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
   1 - SEL$1
   5 - SEL$1_1 / TS@SEL$1
   7 - SEL$1_1 / TRP@SEL$1
   8 - SEL$1_1 / TTI@SEL$1
11 - SEL$1_2 / TS@SEL$1_2
12 - SEL$1_2 / TRP@SEL$1_2
13 - SEL$1_2 / TTI@SEL$1_2
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   7 - filter("TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"<TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE@!),'dd-MON-yy
              hh24:mi:ss')+.000694444444444444444444444444444444444445*:3)
   8 - filter("TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"<>TO_DATE(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("TTI"."CREATED_DATE"),'dd-M
              ON-yy hh24:mi:ss')+.000694444444444444444444444444444444444445*"TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME")
   9 - access("TRP"."TSA_ID"="TTI"."TSA_ID")
       filter(("TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"<>"TRP"."PUSHED_RSN" AND (("TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"=0 AND
              "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"-"TRP"."CURR_RSN"<"TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"*:1) OR
              ("TTI"."MAX_INSTALL">0 AND "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"-"TRP"."CURR_RSN"<"TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"*:2
              ) OR ("TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"="TRP"."PUSHED_RSN" AND "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"<>0)) AND
              (LNNVL("TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"<TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(SYSDATE@!),'dd-MON-yy
              hh24:mi:ss')+.000694444444444444444444444444444444444445*:3) OR
              LNNVL("TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"<>TO_DATE(INTERNAL_FUNCTION("TTI"."CREATED_DATE"),'dd-MON-yy
              hh24:mi:ss')+.000694444444444444444444444444444444444445*"TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"))))
10 - access("TS"."SITE_ID"="TRP"."SITE_ID")
13 - filter("TTI"."STATUS"=1)
Column Projection Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22]
   2 - "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7], "TTI"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."STATUS"[NUMBER,22],
       "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."CREATED_DATE"[DATE,7]
   3 - "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7], "TTI"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."STATUS"[NUMBER,22],
       "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."CREATED_DATE"[DATE,7]
   4 - "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7]
   5 - "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22]
   6 - (#keys=0) "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7]
   7 - "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7]
   8 - "TTI"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."STATUS"[NUMBER,22],
       "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."CREATED_DATE"[DATE,7]
   9 - (#keys=1) "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7],
       "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."CREATED_DATE"[DATE,7], "TTI"."STATUS"[NUMBER,22],
       "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"[NUMBER,22]
10 - (#keys=1) "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7], "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22]
11 - "TS"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TS"."WORKAHEAD_COUNT"[NUMBER,22],
       "TS"."WORKAHEAD_TIME"[NUMBER,22]
12 - "TRP"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."SITE_ID"[NUMBER,22],
       "TRP"."CURR_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_RSN"[NUMBER,22], "TRP"."PUSHED_TIME"[DATE,7]
13 - "TTI"."TSA_ID"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."STATUS"[NUMBER,22],
       "TTI"."MAX_INSTALL"[NUMBER,22], "TTI"."CREATED_DATE"[DATE,7]
105 rows selected.sizes of concerned objects=>
OWNER           SEGMENT_NAME                   SEGMENT_TYPE         TABLESPACE_NAME      EXTENTS           BYTES_
AZD_SCHM     TAS_TSA_INFO                   TABLE                TATSU_DATA_TS             22        7,340,032
AZD_SCHM     TAS_TSA_INFO_PK                INDEX                TATSU_DATA_TS             17        2,097,152
AZD_SCHM     TAS_RECEIPTS_PROCESS           TABLE                TATSU_DATA_TS              1           65,536
AZD_SCHM     TAS_RECEIPTS_PROCESS_IDX       INDEX                TATSU_INDEX_TS             1           65,536
AZD_SCHM     TAS_SITE                       TABLE                TATSU_DATA_TS              1           65,536
AZD_SCHM     TAS_SITE_NAME_UNQ              INDEX                TATSU_INDEX_TS             1           65,536
AZD_SCHM     TAS_SITE_PK                    INDEX                TATSU_DATA_TS              1           65,536
--------------- ------------------------------ -------------------- -------------------- ------- ----------------Please suggest how to tune this above SQL
Does above sql plan looks good
Any comment and help is highely appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
IVW

ivw wrote:
Complete sql =>
Please suggest how to tune this above SQL
Does above sql plan looks good
Any comment and help is highely appreciated.Your SQL is probably incorrectly using the OR operator. In its present form it means this:
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, tas_site
ts
where
trp.tsa_id = tti.tsa_id
and tti.status = 1
and ts.site_id = trp.site_id
and
tti.max_install != trp.pushed_rsn
and (
       (tti.max_install = 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :1
       ) or
       (tti.max_install > 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :2
       ) or
       (tti.max_install = trp.pushed_rsn and
       tti.max_install <> 0
union all
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, tas_site
ts
where
(trp.pushed_time !=
to_date(tti.created_date,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * ts.workahead_time
) and
to_date(sysdate,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * :3
) > trp.pushed_time
and not (above condition)So one of the two parts of the SQL are missing all the join predicates between the tables due to the OR operator at top level. The way the SQL is formatted, it might be meant to read like this:
select distinct trp.site_id from tas_receipts_process trp , tas_tsa_info tti, tas_site
ts
where
trp.tsa_id = tti.tsa_id
and tti.status = 1
and ts.site_id = trp.site_id
and
(tti.max_install != trp.pushed_rsn
and (
       (tti.max_install = 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :1
       ) or
       (tti.max_install > 0 and
           (trp.pushed_rsn - trp.curr_rsn) < ts.workahead_count * :2
       ) or
       (tti.max_install = trp.pushed_rsn and
       tti.max_install <> 0
or   (trp.pushed_time != to_date(tti.created_date,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * ts.workahead_time
      and to_date(sysdate,'dd-MON-yyhh24:mi:ss') + (1/24/60) * :3 > trp.pushed_time
)But you need to find out what exactly it is supposed to express from a logical point of view. Very likely the present form is simply incorrect. Depending on your data correcting the usage of the OR operator might even render the DISTINCT operator redundant which is probably at present used to remove the many duplicates generated by the missing join predicates.
Regards,
Randolf
Oracle related stuff blog:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

Which kind of the CPU can support the FMLE3 to encoding the h264 format

The Signal is yuv or pcm stream , i use the fmle3.0 to encoding to the h.264 format.
Once started.the CPU utility rate is going up to the 100%.
I want to konw,which kind of the CPU can support the live stream.
In other words,My require is encoding the one live stream the cpu utility rate is below 30%.

These are the system requirements:
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashmediaserver/flashmediaencoder/systemreqs/
Other people may have real-world experience to share...
Jody

I just brought Lightroom 5 via online, but cannot support by MAC, how come?

i just brought Lightroom 5 via online, but cannot support by MAC, how come?

Serial numbers for LR are cross platform and CC memberships also are cross platform.
You can download Lightroom's latest update here for Mac: blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2014/11/lightroom-5-7-now-available.html
Regards

Get Windows 10 app reporting 'CPU not supported' Acer Aspire 5738Z

Hi, My first post here so please be gentle I have an Acer Aspire 5738Z with a T4200 Pentium Dual core CPU running Windows 7 Home Premium. The Get Windows 10 app is telling me that I can't install Windows 10 because the CPU isn't supported. A bit of research suggests that this is because NX is not enabled in the Bios, however, even though the CPU supports NX there is no option to enable it in the latest Pheonix Bios incarnation (v1.34) on the notebook. I've chatted with Acer support but it seems all they can do is follow their script and point me towards the Microsoft website where you can check if Win 10 is going to be compatible with the notebook. This obviously pointless as I get the same result. Does anybody know how I can enable NX on the CPU please or if indeed the problem can be overcome by a different method ? I surely can't be the only one with this problem ? Cheers for any help offered

I don't know your CPU, but if your CPU should normally support NX-feature (google said yes), this thread could be interesting for you:http://community.acer.com/t5/Windows-10/AOD257-Windows-10-upgrade-reports-cpu-wouldn-t-support-NX/td-p/372309/jump-to/first-unread-message I have solved the NX-problem by installing a clean Win7. Additional hints: Here you can see if your CPU supports NX:Open Windows Explorer. Right click This PC or Computer and choose, ‘Properties’. Then select the ‘Advanced System settings’ option. Next, from the ‘System Properties’ window, select ‘Advanced’ tab. Choose the ‘Performance’ section now and from the new Performance Options window that appears on your computer screen, select ‘Data Execution Prevention tab’. If you see below a message like "Your computer's processor supports hardware-based DEP", your CPU should support NX You can also try the following:Open the Command Prompt with administrator rights! and enter:bcdedit.exe /set {current} nx AlwaysOnThis should enable NX in your Windows system (not in your BIOS). And if your BIOS is able to enable or disable NX (respective XD), you can look here:http://acer--uk.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/27071/~/how-to-enable-or-disable-secure-bootUnfortunately my BIOS has no option to enable or disable NX and I also can't select secure boot.

CPU not supported

Hi, i have a HP Pro 3015 microtower and i bought an AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, i checked my mainboard (Violet6) in the hp website and it supports this cpu, but when i start my pc i get a message like "CPU not supported, the computer will shut down i few seconds". Any help?
(Now i'm using the integrated Athlon II X2)
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi,
Well, that why I said: check BIOS first. Other thing comes to my mind, the PSU is only 300W therefore it may not have enough power to drive the new CPU.
Good luck.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

CPU FSB clock

I don't know much of computers and i have just bought an Athlon XP 2000+ processor. What BIOS settings do i have to change to make it work at the correct operating speed?
I've anyone could help me, i don't wanto fry my PC.
AMD says it's 266 for the CPU FSB clock it this correct?
thanks
Montana

Welcome
It may be set up correctly now. What speed is your chip running now - about 1667 MHZ. How is chip IDed at startup - XP2000+? If not, say you have 2000+ Tbred, set FSB to 133 (266 DDR) and multiplier to 12.5 (think that's correct default). Be sure to give your motherboard manual a good read! Will help with settings.
Depending on your motherboard model, memory, cooling etc, you may (with some experience) be able to run that chip to 166-200 FSB. But don't try above 133 FSB without proper research. You can damage your system. You'll have to furnish your system details to get a better handle on its potential.

Confused about the 'cpu fsb clock frequency' setting, etc., in cell in bios

just got a new k8n neo2-f nforce3 board with an a64 3500+ venice chip. It is properly recognized in the bios and windows as an a64 3500+ at 2.2ghz, but I'm confused about the cell menu settings in the bios. I see a 'cpu fsb clock frequency' which was automatically set at 200mhz, but the fsb runs at 1Ghz (1000mhz), so what is the 'fsb clock frequency' if not equal to the cpu fsb? Is 200 the correct setting for that? Should I need to change any of the other settings in here? I wonder, because my 3dmark03 score only went up 200 points from the same system with a AthlonXP 2500+ chip and kt4avl mobo, which seems like a low increase to me.....

I would set that to Manual in BIOS, so that you can incremently increase the CPU speed without causing a sudden crash. Each system is different and operates within the specs of not only the CPU, but system memory and PCI-E add-ins as well. Your video card is the primary driver behgind your 3DMark scores...but you haven't listed that?!

Cpu fsb clock setting?

I bought a Microstar MS-6380E KT3 Ultra with an AMD Athlon XP 1800+ (1.53Ghz) 266FSB CPU -- it just got in today.
I have it all set up EXCEPT for the clock frequency. The 6380 has a default of 100mhz, up to 220. But the AMD Athlon XP 1800+ is supposed to be a 266 fsb.
I don't want to overclock my system -- am afraid to endanger my system when I really don't need the extra processing power. I just want it set the way it should be.
There's another field -- CPU Ratio/Vcore (V), w/ the following manual description for it:
The items are used to adjust the CPU clock multiplier (artion) and CPU core voltage (Vcore). The fields provide users a tool to overclock the system. WARNING: Changing CPU Ratio/Vcore could result in the instability of the system; therefore, it is NOT recommended to change the default setting for long-term usage.
I was gonna _guess_ that I set my CPU FSB Clock to 133 and input a CPU clock multiplier (ratio) of 2 (assuming I could do that). Is that the correct way to configure this AMD Athlon 1800+ to this motherboard? The 'CPU core voltage (Vcore)' descriptor is what is making me afraid of experimenting. I would really hate myself if I destroyed my new cpu and/or motherboard less than 6 hours of having received it.
Please advise.

I doubt you can set the clock multiplier to "2" - simply it isn't available. Even if it is available and u hv not unlock your CPU, adjusting the multiplier ratio has no effect at all.
The default multiplier for 1800+ is 11.5x. Multiply it by 133fsb you get 1529.50mhz, hence xp1800+ (1.53G).
Don't confuse yourself, juz follow this setting if u r not overclocking:
FSB Clock: 133
CPU Ratio: AUTO
CPU VCORE: AUTO

845 Ultra ARU CPU FSB Ratios?

The bios provides DRAM Frequencies of 200, 266 and Auto. Given a FSB of 100, that means the ratio of CPU:FSB is 1:1 and 3:4. (What is 'Auto')
If I run the FSB at 133, are these ratios preserved, or does some other ratio come into effect. If I choose FSB of 133 and DRAM Frequency of 266, will I be running at 354 DDR? If so, do you think a stick of Corsair PC2700 (333 DDR) will O/C to that level?

Quote
Originally posted by jdurg
If I recall correctly, once you reach a front-side-bus of 123 MHz, the ratio sticks at 1:1. So at a fsb higher than 123, the memory ratio will ALWAYS be 1:1 no matter what you set it at. X( You are correct on your ratio assumptions, but at 123 MHz the memory ratios become useless. The Auto option is as it suggests. The BIOS will automatically set all the RAM timings per what the chips are rated at. So if you have the memory set to Auto, you won't be able to change the CAS timings and the other various memory options.
The lack of memory ratios on this particular board is what really hurts it. I've got my 1.8A P4 overclocked to 2.52 GHz on a 140 MHz fsb. However, the CPU is being choked to death by a memory bandwidth of only 2.0 GB/s. If there were more memory ratios than the one 1:1 ratio that MSI gives us, I'm sure I could improve my system's performance quite a bit. The other problem with the MSI board, that affects me at least, is that the temperature sensor seems to be out of whack. PC Alert III and MBM5 say that my CPU is at 67-68 degrees Celsius under a full load. With the case open and my hand right on the heatsink during that full load, I can tell you that the reported temperature is at least ten degrees off. If it were really 68C, I would not be able to keep my hand on it without it feeling really warm.
So those are the only two things about the 845 Ultra-ARU that make me really wish I had gotten a different motherboard. :(
Hi jdurg.
I just found a post on Usenet that was very interesting. The poster has an 845 Ultra ARU. Here's the quote:
All this time I used fuzzylogic 4 to overclock my 1.6a to 2.1 @ 133. now I
actually went into BIOS and adjusted my memory settings. This is what I did:
Changed....
DDR Frequency: from 266 to AUTO
Configure DRAM Timing by: from MANUAL to SPD
What I noticed was the CAS# LATENCY changed from 2.5 to 2 (I didn't adjust)
Now I use a program called CPU-Z to get information on the CPU, MB, and MEM.
speeds. Before the changes on the motherboard/CPU speed was normal like:
Before: (with out bios changes)
CPU Frequency: 2119.1 MHz
Clock Multiplier: x 16.0
FSB Frequency: 132.4 MHz
MEM Frequency: 351.4 MHz
before I had problems of computer freezing after a few hours.
Now: (after bios changes)
CPU Frequency: 2119.1 MHz
Clock Multiplier: x 16.0
FSB Frequency: 132.4 MHz
MEM Frequency: 264.9 MHz
also CAS# L: 2clocks, RAS# to CAS# Delay: 2clocks, RAS# Precharge: 2clocks
and Cycle time: 5clocks.
now my main question is how come the MEM Freq. has changed/decreased?
and my system is very stable now (no crashes). is this normal? I have a
no-name, cheap(only paid $60 can.) is this normal for this mem chips?
There was no reply to the message, but it looks like he was getting a 3:4 memory speed ratio with the FSB at 133. This is good! He had DRAM Frequency set to 266 and memory timings set to Manual. Using AUTO and SPD brought his memory back to a 1:1 ratio. My board won't be in until the end of the week... is there anyway you could verify this on your board?

KT880 Delta-FSR XP2400 266 fsb support?

Anyone know if the KT880 Delta-FSR does support my current CPU?
AMD XP2400 266fsb
Thanks.

Very odd chart, it shows the Duron Applebred CPU's as the only 266FSB CPU's supported. One would think that if it can use those, it could use the T-Breds and thornton's as well
This shows the board only supporting 333/400FSB

[VIA] highest cpu/fsb support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for