Video card for Premiere Pro 4.1

I am trying to decide on which video card to get with my new Windows 7 desktop. I run CS4 Master Suite, mostly:
Premiere Pro
After Effects
Photoshop
My criteria would be:
1.Stability.
2. Performance (most importantly for PP and AE, less so for PS)
3. Quiet. I don't want a jet engine in my office.
4. Price. I will spend whatever it takes, but less is more!
I have been researching this for days and cannot figure out what the answer is. I see on the PPBM project that the top machines use a ATI HD4870, but I have also seen some reviews that this card can be pretty noisy.
In case it matters, here are the specs on my new machine:
The new machine is a Dell XPS 9000 (basically a newer version of my current machine). It will sport:
1 Intel Core i7-920 processor (4 cores)
12 GB RAM
One 1 TB OS drive (SATA) (WD Caviar Green variable speed)
One Project RAID 0 array with 3 drives of 2TB each (SATA) (WD Caviar Green variable speed)
Dual 30" 2560 x 1600 monitors
(I will be posting a seperate question about the RAID project drive ... I see some discussion on this board that perhaps I would be better off with 3 seperate drives. I will be asking about that seperately)
Comments? Suggestions?
Thanks in advance!.

+1 on the very slow green drives
for Adobe you never want an ATI card
nVidia is Cuda enabled and off loads some of the load to GPU.
with upcoming CS5 and the Mercury engine you have very very few choices. all are nVidia
285
and higher Quadro series. (which give no absolutely no performance gain over the 285) in fact most of the quadro are based on the much slower 260.
nVidia managed to get Adobe to agree to this can you guess why?
hopefully before release they will at least support the 295 and (doubtfully the 260)
Scott
ADK

Similar Messages

Video card for Premiere Pro

I am considering purchasing a new 2013 Imac 3.2 GHz quad core I5 with 16 GB of ram. I would probably get the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX with 2GB GDDR5 video card. My question is would the video card allow for Mercury Playback and if not would it get me close to that kind of performance the Mercury Playback provides with Premiere Pro?

Let's assume you are willing to spend € 1000 on your system.
If you get the GTX 660 Ti, you are out of around € 250-300 and that leaves you with around € 700-750 to spend on your disk setup. You already have an 8-port LSI controller. You also have 4 disks, set up as two raid0 arrays, giving you an approximate transfer raid of 260 BG/s on each array if they are modern disks, maybe 200 GB/s if they are somewhat older.
If you were to get say 6 Seagate Constellation ES 1 TB disks @ € 90, that would set you back around € 540 but you gain 6 TB of raw space (5 TB net in raid5), and when configured as a 6 disk raid5 array would give you about 600 GB/s transfer rate. This would require moving one raid0 array to the Marvell ports on your mobo. To me that looks like a better solution than the Titan card.

ATI 5770 1GB Video Card For Mac Pro dvi hdmi cable

I am sending video signal over a 50FT HDMI To DVI from my Mac Pro (3,1) via ATI 5770 1GB Video Card For Mac Pro (5.0 GT/s) (181062917108) and I cannot get a constant signal to my TV. The signal stays on for a few seconds or several hours or my TV (Samsung) says there is no signal or I get just a gray static screen.
I never had a problem before with my previous video card the 512MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT with a 25ft long cable. Any ideas people?

A cable of about 5 meters (16 ft) can be manufactured to Category 1 specifications easily and inexpensively by using 28 AWG (0.081 mm²) conductors.[114] With better quality construction and materials, including 24 AWG (0.205 mm²) conductors, an HDMI cable can reach lengths of up to 15 meters (49 ft).[114]
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI
You may need a higher-quality cable or a lower resolution for your display to make this work without an HDMI Repeater.

GPU Acceleration Cards For Premiere Pro CS5

Hello:
I am ready to invest in a GPU accelerated graphics card that will speed up playback and use the Mercury Playback Engine in GPU mode.
From what I could find on the Adobe site, these are the cards that are supported for Premiere Pro CS5
Supported NVIDIA video cards for GPU acceleration (CS5):
GeForce GTX 285 (Windows and Mac OS)
GeForce GTX 470 (Windows)
Quadro 4000 (Windows and Mac OS)
Quadro 5000 (Windows)
Quadro 5000M (Windows)
Quadro FX 3800 (Windows)
Quadro FX 4800 (Windows and Mac OS)
Quadro FX 5800 (Windows)
Quadro CX
Can anyone give me a recommendation from your own experience? Is the list of cards above still valid?
Thanks,
Rich Locus

So... before I go out and spend $650 on a GeForce GTX 680, it is this simple to make it work in CS5?
Yes.
(1) Make sure the card has at least 1GB of VRAM (which the GTX 680 has).
(2) Edit the cuda_supported_cards.txt to add one line: GeForce GTX 680 (starting in column 1)
(3) Install the card?
Do step 3 before step 2.
Also, you can simply delete the cuda_supported_cards.txt file
and achieve the same result.
Will Premiere Pro recognize that I have the card and immediately take advantage of the GPU capabilities, or do I have to change options?
You will need to specify:
"MPE GPU Acceleration" in your Project Settings:
If you do not have a supported card (or have not applied the hack),
this option will be greyed out.

Dual Monitor video cards for HP Pro 3400

I am looking to add a 2nd monitor to my HP Pro 3400 MT and want to make sure I get a video card that will not have any compatibility issues. I'm not doing any gaming so I don't think I need anything super fancy and I would prefer not to have to upgrade the power supply.
So my questions are:
Is the HP Pro 3400 MT compatible witha PCI Express 3.0 card? 2.1 ?
How much power draw from the video card would require me to upgrade the power supply (my PC is stock, no added peripherals). Is there a way for me to determine how much is being currently (no pun intended) drawn?
Are there any drawbacks to usnig the built-in video card for 1 monitor and a new, single-ouput card for the other (vs a dual-output card) ?
Anything else I need to consider when deciding on a new video card?
Thanks.

Hi,
You might get better assistance on the HP Enterprise Business Forum since you have a business class PC.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

New GTXGe Force770 video card but Premiere pro not seeing it?

Hi - this is probably a dumb question.. but i have upgraded with a new video card which is CUDA enabled but in New Project Settings the Video render box is greyed out. What do I have to do to have Premiere & Photoshop use the maximum power of this new video card ? Am sure there is something I haven't done? is ther some driver I need to download?
HELP appreciated!

History of MINIMUM requirements from CS3 to Cloud to see if that card is DIRECTLY supported, or if you need to do the hack for CS6
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/system-requirements-premiere-pro.html
If your nVidia card has at least 1Gig of video ram, use the nVidia Hack http://forums.adobe.com/thread/629557 - which is a simple entry in a "supported cards" file

Is Lightroom a viable tool to manage video assets for Premiere Pro?

I'm trying to determine the easiest workflow for cataloging and importing DSLR video footage for my video productions. Generally, I simply drag my video footage from the memory card over to my RAID array and store the footage in a subfolder named after the date it was shot. I'd love to be able to use the metadata features of lightroom to help catalog my vast library of footage. Currently, the only way I have it organized is by date and then by Premiere Pro project.
Does anyone use Lightroom for video cataloging? I know it is possible, but I have found little info on whether this is a common workflow.
I'd like to avoid using a different third party cataloging system, so if any of you are using lightroom for your premiere pro cataloging I'd love to hear your advice.

+1 on the very slow green drives
for Adobe you never want an ATI card
nVidia is Cuda enabled and off loads some of the load to GPU.
with upcoming CS5 and the Mercury engine you have very very few choices. all are nVidia
285
and higher Quadro series. (which give no absolutely no performance gain over the 285) in fact most of the quadro are based on the much slower 260.
nVidia managed to get Adobe to agree to this can you guess why?
hopefully before release they will at least support the 295 and (doubtfully the 260)
Scott
ADK

Which dual DVI video card for Mac Pro?

We just got a Mac Pro at work with a single DVI port video card. Want to use 2 monitors, but don't want to order an incompatible card. Don't need screaming performance, just a stable setup for a sprawling desktop with some applications running low-res/low-frame-rate animation.
One Evga card that looked like about the right specs was shown on MacMall's site as 'platform: universal' but the manufacturer's site specifed Windows and Vista. Called MacMall and tech support said it wasn't supported. So, now I'm suspicious.
Anyone have a list of decent cards that will work? Would like to keep it at or under $100.

You could just add an adapter, though not everyone is happy with that, for your 2nd port on the GT120.
Could wait for Nvidia eVGA GTX 285 Mac Edition next month.
http://eshop.macsales.com/item/EGVA/01GP31080TR/
There is/was and should be 8800GT with nice specs and dual monitor support.
Barefeats is a great resource of tests and benchmarks.
This gives a good idea of what cards and what to expect:
http://barefeats.com/nehal10.html
Some discussions of 4870, GTX285 etc.
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=705291
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=7546575#post7546575
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=694042
And some comments on the FX 4800 and using in Windows vs OS X:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=705457

Best Export / Video settings for Premiere Pro. Help Needed.

What's the best settings when you want to export a video from Premiere Pro for the web or otherwise. Best settings = good quality video and LOW file size.
Benchmark : The videos on Apple Trailers. Check them out at http://www.apple.com/trailers
The trailers are of high quality video, great sounds, and the Large sizes all fall under the 25MB mark. Any ideas on HOW this is done and what
settings in Premiere Pro CS3 might be able to replicate such standards?
Any help is appreciated. I normally use Encoder and export using H264 but that always seems to have an Audio lag. Any similar issues?
Thanks a mil!

I understand that better quality = bigger file size. That's true in most cases, but there is a way around it, I'm just not sure what that way is. As I mentioned in the original post, the benchmark is http://www.apple.com/trailers . The non-HD videos on any movie page on that site hardly ever exceeds the 25MB mark. The videos are 2-3minutes long, and while they may not be top-notch BD visuals, they look way better than 95% of the stuff that's streamed off the net.
That's why I asked if anyone had any ideas on how to replicate something like that. Say I had a avi file of great quality, shot with a Panasonic DV Cam. I Capture the footage, do whatever I have to in Pr, and the result is now a 3minute video. I want it exported to a Quicktime file, I want it to look visually pleasing like the trailers on Apple, and I want it to fall under 25MB. I have tried H.264 encoding, regular Quicktime, and Quicktime via Encoder. Nothing reaches the expected quality.
For more examples visit http://www.passionpictures.com.my/pages/recent.aspx and download those simple 30second clips. All Quicktime, mostly under 5.5MB. If Pr can't do it, then I don't know what can...so I'm sure Pr can do it.
Problem is, how? Experimentation is definitely a way to go, I get that. But on the basis of the scenario given above...how is it done?

Need a new video card for 2008 pro

hi to all,
i have a mac pro early 2008
with next parts
2*2,8 ghz quad core
10gb 800 mhz ddr2
ati radeon hd 2600 xt 256mb
and osx 10.8.4
i like to upgrade this so that i can use flight game x-plane
the recommend system specifications are
3ghz(multi core)
4gb ram
a directx 11 video card with 1 gb onboard,dedicated vram
i realy don't know what they mean with this,so what's the best video card that i can use in this system
a good(best) card without problems
i would stay with ati radeon bcse at this moment no problems with them
thanks for your help
marc

New Nvidia Quadro/GeForce Drivers for OS X 10.8.5 (12F45) + CUDA Update
Monday's news had a report from a Mac Pro owner that the (Sept. 19th) Nvidia Driver Update for OS X 10.8.5 (12F37) were broken by the OS X 10.8.5 Supplemental Update (12F45). Wednesday he sent a FYI on another driver update. (Popup from the previous install's web check I assume.)
"New Nvidia driver for 10.8.5 Supplemental restores functionality
Recently I send you a mail, describing a problem with Nvidia drivers (for build 12F37) after updating to the latest supplemental OS update (12F45).
Yesterday, a friendly window popped up, asking me to download a new Nvidia Geforce driver. After finishing, I can use the NVidia driver again within 10.8.5. (12F45)
Just for completion.
Kind regards, Jörg"
Thanks Jörg. After getting his mail I checked the Nvidia drivers download page again and there is now a new update available (as well as a later Cuda version). See Quadro & GeForce Mac OS X (12F45) Driver Release 313.01.03f02 which also refers to a later CUDA driver - v5.5.25. (Driver page's Additional Info tabs have install info.) '
GTX from EVGA is a 680, but some do go for a PC version 670.

Upgrading a Video Card for Mac Pro (Early 2008)

I have little experience upgrading systems hardware and I was hoping to get some input as I try to figure out a cost effective card for my 2008 mac.
What I have:
* 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel
* ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
* with OSX 10.10.2 Yosemite
. . . so far I am looking at the 5770 HD to be a likely replacement if I buy the right one (some, if I'm understanding correctly, aren't compatible because they were flashed for older systems or are simply defective and so require selective shopping— hence, they were not officially supported). Also, I am unsure if OS Yosemite runs the older cards.
I work with Photoshop, Illustrator, and play games like Starcraft2 and WoW.
My question is:
Which video cards are compatible with my system and what would be the best replacement? . . . and will I have to downgrade from OS Yosemite to run certain cards?
Thanks in advance!

Hi there, welcome to the community.
My advice to you, to achieve cost effective performance, would be to use any vanilla NVIDIA graphics card. Newer versions of Mac OS X have drivers that should be compatible with the card out of the box. The only downside to using a non-mac specific card is that you wont see the boot up process, as the graphics card wont be initialized until the system is completely loaded. If this concerns you, leave your old card in one of the slower, unused slots if possible.
If you are worried about compatibility, I would recommend purchasing at Best Buy, where you can take advantage of their return policy.
For more info, check out:
How to breathe new life into a dying Mac Pro | iMore

Best video card for mac pro

Mac Pro Info:2x2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon
MacPro1, 1
It says my mac pro (2006-2007) model had PCIe slots, but it doesn't mention PCI 2.0 slots. i'm looking to upgrade my video card to one of the better ones for this computer. currently i have a radeon x1900 XT 512 card. it can get clunky at times. I've been reading a lot about the Radeon HD5770, but it says it works with PCI 2.0. i've been reading that a lot of people that currently have the x1900 XT upgrade to the HD5770. but I don't want to buy an incompatible one. I just did that on my RAM and had to return it.
Does anyone know if this card will work? and will both mini display ports work as well?
or do you have a better suggestion for an upgrade?
i don't do a whole lot of gaming, but i like having a junky desktop with 30 browser windows open and 10 other programs open at the same time. i would like a card that is good for that. thanks again!

OpenGL 3.2 support15
Image quality enhancement technology
Up to 24x multi-sample and super-sample anti-aliasing modes
Adaptive anti-aliasing
16x angle independent anisotropic texture filtering
128-bit floating point HDR rendering
http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/ati-radeon-hd-5000/hd-5770/Pages /ati-radeon-hd-5770-overview.aspx#5
X1900 http://www.amd.com/us/products/desktop/graphics/other/Pages/x1900-specifications .aspx
not all ATI Radeon graphics cards are HDCP ready.
Complete feature set also supported in OpenGL® 2.0
Barefeats: adding the Radeon HD 5870 or 5770 to your 2006 Mac Pro won't cause it to "leap tall buildings in a single bound." But these new cards will help you "clear low buildings with a running start."
OpenGL 2.1 Released on July 2, 2006. Where is the 4.2 support, or even 3.2 support??
Apple lags by over half a decade and has not done much to modernize graphic driver support to current available standards.
OpenGL 4.2 Released on 8 August 2011[33]
Supported Cards: Nvidia GeForce 400 series, Nvidia GeForce 500 series, Nvidia GeForce 600 series, ATI Radeon HD 5000 series, AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series, AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series
Support for shaders with atomic counters and load/store/atomic read-modify-write operations to a single level of a texture.
Capturing GPU-tessellated geometry and drawing multiple instances of the result of a transform feedback to enable complex objects to be efficiently repositioned and replicated.
Support for modifying an arbitrary subset of a compressed texture, without having to re-download the whole texture to the GPU for significant performance improvements.
Support for packing multiple 8 and 16 bit values into a single 32-bit value for efficient shader processing with significantly reduced memory storage and bandwidth.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGL
OpenCL 1.1 was ratified by the Khronos Group on 14 June 2010 - "Hello, that is full two years ago." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL#cite_note-11
OpenCL 1.2 On 15 November 2011, the Khronos Group announced the OpenCL 1.2 specification,[13] which added significant functionality over the previous versions in terms of performance and features for parallel programming. Most notable features include:
Device partitioning: the ability to partition a device into sub-devices so that work assignments can be allocated to individual compute units. This is useful for reserving areas of the device to reduce latency for time-critical tasks.
Separate compilation and linking of objects: the functionality to compile OpenCL into external libraries for inclusion into other programs.
Enhanced image support: 1.2 adds support for 1D images and 1D/2D image arrays. Furthermore, the OpenGL sharing extensions now allow for OpenGL 1D textures and 1D/2D texture arrays to be used to create OpenCL images.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL
OpenCL is a trademark of Apple Inc.

Fastest Video Card for Mac Pro with Dual-Core Intel Xeon

Can anyone offer advise on whether I can update the video card in my Mac Pro Dual-Core Intel Xeon computer? I'm pretty sure i can but I have no idea how to upgrade and what to look for in video cards. I do know that I want something fast, hopefully faster than the current ATI Radeon X1900 XT for use with Aperture 3.0. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

5770 in the 2006 Mac Pro
ATI HD 5770 MC742ZM A

PCIe x1 video Card for Mac Pro 2006?

Hello ,
My need is a little backwards of the regular request. We have a 2006 Mac Pro (upgraded to the dual quad-core Xeon 2.33ghz E5345) we are using for LTO data backup, not the usual graphics/editing setup.
So what we have found is the original NVidia card is PCIe 8x graphics, we also have an 8x RAID card and an 8x SAS HBA for the LTO tape drives. All this is taxing the PCIe bus on this older mac. We would like to free things up a bit by putting in a video card that does not attempt to use, or at least reserve a full 8 lanes for it's own use.
If this was a newer Mac Pro then no issue... But as it is now, I am getting lockups and freezes and other issues that I am sure are related to having 3 high-bandwidth cards in the same machine.
Anyone know of a good x1 business graphics card that can work for a Mac Pro (Snow Leopard 10.6.8)
Robert

Move the cards.
Some slots can't be 16x, and one can't be 8 or 16x.
Also, the PCIe is 1.1 which means half the bandwidth of current specification.
A driver or utility ought to tell you it isn't getting bandwIdth I guess.
A PC with PCIe 2.1, or wait for next generation of motherboards that could have even more bandwidth, PCIe 3.0, to support things like ThunderBolt, SSD controllers with 8 and 16Gbit/sec in bandwidth.
Or a computer with more than 4 PCIe slots or an expansion chassis.
What could be cause?
drivers
IOKit
Rule out means trial and error of trying with just one thing changed at a time and get it working, then move on.
7300GT in slot #3 for starters.
Put your most demanding in slot #1 which is double width.
More air flow, boost the darn fan rpm and keep them @ 1200 rpm
I'd pull drive bay #4 and keep it free to allow more airflow for an 8x card
High density FBDIMMs. Odd but 4GB DIMMs run cooler and better, and in 1,1 the ideal is just a set of 4 (two on each Riser) for 4 x 2GB or 4 x 4GB.
Different SAS and RAID cards. Maybe they don't get along and have bus contention or driver conflict.
Are you using ATTO? usually a good bet.
You aren't using Mid-2010 Mac Pro and can't use 64-bit kernel, which is a shame but simplifies troubleshooting and no issue with 64-bit drivers.

Buying Video Card for Mac Pro

I am researching all over the net. Just trying to get a 100% answer. I was wondering if this video card works with Mac Pro
VisionTek 900244 Radeon HD 4870 512MB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFire Supported Video Card - Retail
The manufacture is different, but it is still Radeon HD 4870 512 MB GDDR5 just like the one at the Apple Store. But the Apple store is 349.00
Thanks

Well, I think it's more for a hobbyist. Like hatter said, even with the possibility of bricking a card, there is that certain satisfaction of "learning at new art", and I guess there is always the great feeling of "beating the system", so to speak.
It does pose as a good choice though budget wise, if you are willing. Only reason why I ended up buying an apple oem 4870 is that I had a $200 gift card to apple...and the mini-pcie cable shipping from ATI was too expensive (more than double the price of the cables -_-) If not for that though, I would have bought a pc card. On my 1st gen, the 1GB memory would have served me better since I'm still running PCIe 1.0 (2.5 GT/s).
Plus, buying a PC 4870 gives you the option to run crossfire if you so choose to in the future. According to someone in macrumors, Apple deliberately removed crossfire ability in the OEM 4870, rendering it impossible.
I think the apperance of bootcamp too, also makes flashing a MUCH more attractive option. However PCs being most reliable, we no longer need a separate PC to flash. Everything can be done straight in bootcamp on one machine.
Once the GTX 285 hits, expect a "race to dump GTX 285 ROM" thread to start up there after

Video card for Premiere Pro 4.1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for