Video Over Low Speed Link

Posting some family videos on a website, plenty of bandwith
on the web server side. However on the user side anything less than
1.5 downstream the video plays for a few seconds and then buffers
and then again so I never get a good video play.
I've only played with the buffer time up to 5.0 and gets
better but of course there is the wait thing and I don't know how
to put a preloader for the video part. Any thoughts here are
appreciated by me and my kids Grandmothers.
Thanks.

Buffer 15 to 30 seconds. Make sure to tell them there will be
a long load time. There really isn't much you can do besides
that.

Similar Messages

Video Conferencing over Low speed WAN links

Hi there,
Can somebody explain possible point-to-nultipoint video conferencing solution over low speed WAN links ?
( I have central site and about 20 remote sites - hub and spoke configuraition)
a. What is the minimum BW requirement
b. If using Cisco Video advantage at users desktop how do we select the proper MCU at the central site ?

Buffer 15 to 30 seconds. Make sure to tell them there will be
a long load time. There really isn't much you can do besides
that.

Data, voice, video & fax over the satellite link

Hi,
We have a requirement for Cisco voice to be implemented at our satellite teleport. This is basically to connect our teleport location HO to Barge (sea platform - rig) via the satellite. At the rig we would require data, voice, video & fax services. The satellite WAN BW is 256kbps. The Barge users will use four telephones, one fax & will do videoconferencing. They will communicate with teleport HO & use the PSTN for internationatal dialling using the HO voice gateway.There is no Cisco call manager in place. There is PBX (Brand-NEC, Model- NECX 2400) system at the HO.
Appreciate if somebody can recommend as to what would be the best way to provide voice, fax & video connectivity to the users in the barge.Thanks.
Rgds./
Sack

Buy Unified Communications Manager, SageCom XMediusFAX, and a Cisco ISR G2 router for the head office to provide PSTN calling and faxing support. Buy a second ISR G2 with Unified Communications license, the appropriate CME license count, and a ISM running CUE for voicemail. Configure UCM and CME to communicate using a SIP trunk and configure QoS on the satellite to prioritize the voice and signaling traffic. You will not get video calling across a link that small.

Cisco 2811 routers to route video over ip for polycom equipment.

Hi forum,
We are currently using polycom equipments over ISDN links for video conferencing, however, we intend to switch to our EIGRP E1 lines for that. all our sites are currently using 2811 routers to route both data and voip traffic. How do I provision the network so that I can use my E1 lines for video over ip, How should I design it?
Besides, How do i provide video over ip service to my mobile users who vpn into my network.
Thanks and best regards,
paul

first, on provisioning your network for video over ip, make sure you can implement the QoS required to provide a clear, unchoppy video stream.
your design could look something like the following:
polycom >> network >> router >> E1 >> router >> network >> user
(very basic description, you may require more detail depeding on your needs)
also, for video over ip to your vpn users, you might be able to use something like cisco IPTV or the likes. (depending on the type of video you want to provide your users)
please see the following link for video over ip for polycom:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk1077/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080111c1b.shtml#configqos
please see the following link for more QoS for video conferencing info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk757/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094968.shtml
please see the following link for info on video over ipsec vpn:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns340/ns394/ns171/ns241/netbr09186a0080125154.html

Why do i have to turn on my cellular data to send my photo or video over text ( otherwise it wont send at all) when my home wifi is on

every time i try to send a photo or video over text it try and send for like 5 seconds and then not deliver.

Your Welcome.. and on your questions I'm going to have to put a pot of coffee on and put my thinker into action see what I can come up with with sending pictures messages The Link I included explains the why and the How..
On your second Question how to take a picture that is in the folder you mention try long pressing on the picture and see if brings up a small list of options if does see if shows your Gallery as an option if so press it see then see if any happens hopefully it move to the Gallery.. hit your home button then hit your apps button go to Gallery and see if the picture is in there and it may already be in there under a certain label but give that a try and let me know what ya came up with.. b
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multimedia_Messaging_Service

Crazy low speed from the off

hi all,
im a (relatively) new BT customer in a brand new build house. Before moving in i did some digging around to see what sort of speeds i could get with different providers and settled on BT as they seemed to be the best average and i preferred the BT home hub compared to the other ISPs offerings. (i would also add that im an IT engineer so did the usual **bleep** studying beforehand although whether this is a disadvantage remains to be seen)
i have been on the service for a month or two now and am getting dreadful low speeds. On average i get 750kbps down (max 950kbps) and 200kbps up. i have checked the disitance to the exchange with all the usual tools and its 0.9 miles away apprently. I have checked out all of my wiring and tried several ADSL filters but this is the speed i am stuck with.
I opened a case with BT and am getting the usual. (i would mention at this point that there is an issue with the BT site where you check what speeds you MAY get, if you're not a BT customer (which i wasn't) and you stick your address you get the 'up to 12meg' result, if you ARE a BT customer then you put your actual phone number in you get the REAL result. in my case i was advised i would get 'around 12meg' but then i was told i would actually get 'around 1meg', this is not good)
i am advised by BT that my exchange will get ADSL2 by the end of this year (2x-3x? ADSL) but im not counting my chickens. For info i came from a great 20meg cable connection in my old house so theres a big old step in the right direction
Im sure that this has been covered many a time on these forums so apologies if i just havent found my answers and feel free to just link me somewhere or copy and paste some jazz
anyone have any ideas or suggestions?
thanks in advance
David

As already been advised in bits and bobs:
The top tips for a good connection on a long line are as follows:
1) Is removing the bell wire as I have already advised and to have a good clean socket, with all the wires moved away from the connected wires, or snipped off all together, just to ensure as little interference as possible.
2) Would be to get a business hub, there are two available on Ebay, the 2701 (pictured right) and the 2700hgv (pictured left), now the 200HGV's seem to give a better sync speed by about 300kbps give or take, but I find they are less stable, whereas the 2701 decreases the sync speed but is far more stable, and good at holding onto low SNR's, I've seen it hold all night at -2dB Noise Margin and Im on a 9km line.
3) Would be to get a shieled RJ11 cable, as this can reduce the amount of interference, and also importantly it has the twists in as the telephone cables do to refract UV radiation, and Impulse noise just to name a few things. And the ends of them are gold plated with 24k gold just to ensure maximum transition .
Regards Edd
Check your Line
BT Speedtester

Low speed

Have very low speed - 0.225 mbs, download. On signing up I was told I will be receiving minimum of 8mbs, average of 15mbs and a maximum of 19mbs. Besides being passed from pillar to post as no-one understands why the broadband is so low I have just been informed that the maximum I can get is now 10mbs - quite a big difference? I have also been told I will be charged to have the phone line looked at even though it was only installed by BT two months previously so I will be paying twice. Is this right? I have been lied to, called a liar, transferred to every department within BT. Each member of staff has told me they can't help that I need to be transferred to a different department so after five hours on the phone I am still at square one! This has been going on for two months. Oh I was also told I would receive compensation for not receiving a service but apparently I'm suddenly not eligible for this. I can get faster broadband (more than 10mbs) for cheaper elsewhere. BT have broken the contract by not supplying me with the service that they promised. BT staff don't seem to know much as they can't even agree on the rate of broadband I should be receiving. This is not to mention how rude they have all been towards me. I am thankful that everything is recorded as this proves that I am not at fault and there are obviously training issues that need to be addressed within all departments in the company. Has anyone else had the same experience? Can any moderators respond?

Hello, thanks for your response.
I can assure you that i have tried absolutely everything including replacement router, filters etc.
The line was only installed on the 14th April, and BT only guarantee their work for a month! I paid £130 to have a line installed...
They have admitted there is a fault in the line, but even after 6 hours of diagnostic tests still cant find the problem. These tests werent all carried out today but over the past 2 months yet they still didn't send another engineer round to check the line had been installed correctly. I was only offered this option once the "28 day" warranty on the line had expired hence I was expected to pay for it. If this information is incorrect, i have been lied to by the Technical team at BT once again.
The end result after approx 6 hours on the phone today was that i demanded a full refund for the past 2 months of broadband that i was paying for but not receiving, which was granted after a struggle, and a cancellation of the contract due to BT breaching the contract on at least 2 counts. The first being that i was lied to by the initial sales advisor about the speed of the internet connection i was to expect and BT could not honour this and the second due to paying for a service that i was not receiving. I still have not resolved the problem with the line itself which needs to be looked at by BT regardless of which isp i decide to go with now.
I think BT really need to look into the staff they have on the end of the phone as they have been nothing but helpless and i can imagine that they have lost BT 1000's of customers due to their lack of knowledge or training.

FR: Keep Video and Audio clips Linked in Multicam once razored

Here is my feature request, if you agree please cut and paste and submit to feature request!
https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform
*******Enhancement / FMR*********
Brief title for your desired feature:
Keep Video and Audio cuts in a Multicam sequence linked together when using the razor tool.
How would you like the feature to work?
Whether inside a multicam created sequence, or a multicam sequence that has been pasted into another layer on a separate sequence, I want the video and audio to remain linked together when a cut is made. Currently, when I make a cut, the audio and video become unlinked and I have to first a. make all the razor cuts, then b. go and relink the video and audio clips back together. Takes an extra 30 minutes every time now.
Why is this feature important to you?
To save time and stop the long redundant process of click selecting the video and audio and linking them, over and over and over, in a multicam sequence. Obviously if I can do it manually, it can also be done in-program.

When you create the multicam sequence manually (still the best way, I think), video and audio remain linked.

Connection issues and low speeds

Hi there,
my family have been with BT now for about 3 or so years and the connection had been rather good until about late last year. According to my family it's everytime I come back home from uni the internet starts to play up as in:
. Low speeds
.Drops out and loses connection
Believing it was somehow my laptop causing the issues I backed everything up and completly wiped it because BT support thought it may be a virus on my machine even the the checks came back with nothing. So I've wiped my laptop and restarted it like it was a brand new laptop...still we're having these issues so I refuse to believe it's my laptop causing the problems. I've changed the chanel on the hub so many times it just doesn't make a difference. Tried different DSL adapters tried different cables even a wired connection causes problems. I am begining to think it's because the router has had it but I am willing to try anything at this point before asking for a new router from BT. Even BT don't seem to know what the problem is all they do is reset the routers chanel every single time I ring them.
So any advice or help would be greatly appreaciated
Many Thanks
Benjamin
PS - sorry for any grammar/spelling mistakes , I've written this in a hurry before the internet drops out again...

Hi Welcome to the community forums
Here is a basic guide to getting help from the community members done by CL Keith Please read through the link posted http://forumhelp.dyndns.info/speed/first_steps.html
once you have posted the information asked for then the community members can help you more
Thank You
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Streaming iTunes (shared library) video over ethernet...

I'm hoping someone with combined iTunes and networking savvy might be willing to help me out here. Here's the setup,
I have an Intel iMac hooked up to Fantom 1TB drive via USB 2.0 (iTunes library on external). The iTunes library is shared to an iBook G4 over ethernet via a Linksys Wireless B router (but both comps are wired in for max speed). (To be clear, when I say 'shared' I mean that I open iTunes on the iBook with it's own library and select the shared iMac library from within the iTunes GUI). When I go to play videos over the shared library on the iBook they are quite choppy and slow and I'm wondering where the bottleneck is.
I'm using Cat5e cable (1000Mbs+ so far as I can gather), but the router ports are 10/100 as is the ethernet port on the iBook (max 100Mbs). Further, the iBook has only 32MB of VRAM (although I've upgraded the RAM to 1.12GB). The iMac is running Leopard 10.5.5, iBook running Tiger 10.4.11, both machines running iTunes 8.0.1. I'm presuming that the read and transfer rates of the external are not the issue here because there are no problems viewing on the iMac, but I could be wrong.
So is the bottleneck the 10/100 ethernet ports on the router/iBook, the iBook VRAM, or is there something inherent in iTunes library sharing itself that is causing the delays? I also have an Xbox 360 which reads the same shared library via Rivet/Connect360 over the same network and router and videos are fine on the Xbox which makes me think the problem is with the iBook or iTunes.
I ask because I'm considering upgrading the router, and even replacing the iBook, but if it's something to do with iTunes itself, then there's not much point.
Thanks to any and all who can offer advice.

This evening I tried to narrow down the problem further and I think it boils down to the iBook not being able to process the video data fast enough rather than the transfer rate over the network or something inherent in iTunes.
To do this I shared my library folder on the network and copied a file from it to the iBook's HDD, adding it also to iTunes locally on the iBook. The quality is the same whether I view it:
1) Through the iTunes GUI 'SHARED' library over the network
2) By opening it directly (using Quicktime) over the network through the mounted shared folder in finder
3) Viewing it in Quicktime directly from the iBook's internal HDD
4) Viewing it locally in iTunes from the iBook's HDD
Now the question is whether the iBook should be able to view this video smoothly given its hardware, or do I have the logic board VRAM problem that I've been reading about...I guess an issue for another post/topic.
Thanks for trying to help Tom.

Streaming video over http

Hello
I need your help to understand how streaming over http works
In our company we have about 600 users who will be able to view streaming video over http hosted in Internet
We have 100 Mbps Internet link . What can we expect to happen in the network when there is contention for resources to access video on our network which delivers best effort service for video
We have enough bandwidth 4 gigs in local area network to core , so there's no real bandwidth cruch
How to differentiate or monitor bandwidth used for http streaming as against http normal traffic
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

One step closer:
Changed the crossdomain.xml file (more permissive settings).
Changed the encoding on FMLE to vp6. Working somewhat (don't know what I did to make it start streaming through hds).
But at least now I can get the individual streams in the set manifest file to work:
http://localhost/hds-live/livepkgr/_definst_/livevent/livestream1.f4m
http://localhost/hds-live/livepkgr/_definst_/livevent/livestream2.f4m
http://localhost/hds-live/livepkgr/_definst_/livevent/livestream3.f4m
BUT when I try to play the streams through the set manifest file from http://localhost/liveevent.f4m I'm getting the following error:
"The F4m document contains errors URL missing from Media tag." I'll search the forums to see if anyone else has come across this problem.
I used the f4m config tool to make the file. These are the file's contents:
<manifest xmlns="http://ns.adobe.com/f4m/2.0">
<baseURL>http://localhost/hds-live/livepkgr/_definst_/liveevent/</baseURL>
<media href="livestream1.f4m " bitrate="200"/>
<media href="livestream2.f4m " bitrate="500"/>
<media href="livestream3.f4m " bitrate="1000"/>
</manifest>
Thanks

Facing Problems in Streaming Video over internet using FMS 3.5

I,am using FMS 3.5 to stream video over internet.This video will be a part of a website www.mywebsite.com . I have the webserver in my company. This webserver has the local LAN IP : 192.168.10.19 which is binded with a public internet ip 212.77.xx.xx .This website is hosted using IIS 6.0 on OS windows 2003 server with SP2
I created a swf name sample.swf from sample.flv file and gave it the rtmp address as follows:
rtmp://192.168.10.19/vod/_StreamingVideo_/sample.flv (where _StreamingVideo_ is the instance on the server, and 192.168.10.19 is the LAN IP of server) ,and it worked fine and every one within the local company network could see the streaming video. Now i tried to replace this local address with the public address and the address became as follows:
rtmp://212.77.xx.xx/vod/_StreamingVideo_/sample.flv
After giving this public IP in the rtmp address i,am getting a message "Failed to load Flv from the address rtmp://212.77.xx.xx/vod/_StreamingVideo_/sample.flv" and as as result the video is not streamed and it only shows the progress bar on the link
www.mywebsite.com/VideoStreaming/Sample.html without loading the video. I have also checked the ports 80,1935,1111 on the server and they are open. Is there any problem with my rtmp address with public IP or any other reason ??. Please help me out in this regard because im realy stuck here.

Adding to my previous post this is the XML output i get when i try to access the fms admin console from local ip address i.e http://192.168.10.19:1111/fms_adminConsole.htm
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <result>
<level>error</level>
<code>NetConnection.Connect.Rejected</code>
<description>Admin user requires valid username and password.</description>
<timestamp>2/3/2010 8:26:08 AM</timestamp>
</result>
but when i try to access fms admin console through public ip (http://212.77.xx.xx:1111/fms_adminConsole.htm) then it gives me the following :
Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage.
Any more suggestions Jay (because really ur the only one helping me out in this so far) ??

Sky Fibre constant drop out and low speed

Hi everyone,
Just recently switched provider from Plusnet fibre to Sky fibre and boy, has it been a stressful few days. First off, our fibre went live on the 6th of this month but these last couple of days I've been experiencing low speeds between 10-20 mb which I understand is meant to be normal (Never had this issue when I joined plusnet) and I have constant drop outs when I'm surfing the net or playing internet games on my Wii U
I've phoned Sky within the last two days and told them what's going on and they've done some tests on their end and they are telling me that I'm getting speeds up to 41 mb which I'm not getting, but they can't seem to understand why I keep having this drop out issue with my devices and my laptop and my gaming console. They have sent me a new hub, but I personally don't think sending out a new hub will make a difference. I've stuck a a Ethernet cable into my Sky fibre router and attached a openreach router, to the other end and see if that stops the drop out.
I'm inclined to leave sky, because I have a feeling this poor service will continue, unless someone can help me.
Thanks

Jan 1 00:00:07 syslog: BusyBox v1.17.2
Jan 1 00:00:16 syslog: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Jan 1 00:00:24 syslog: Line 0: VDSL G.993 started
Jan 1 00:00:31 syslog: Line 0: VDSL2 link down
Jan 1 00:00:34 syslog: Line 0: xDSL G.994 training
Jan 1 00:00:42 syslog: Line 0: VDSL G.993 started
Jan 1 00:01:01 syslog: Line 0: VDSL2 link up, Bearer 0, us=9995, ds=39998
Jan 1 00:01:04 syslog: ptm0.1 - WAN link UP.
Jan 1 00:01:04 syslog: Received valid DHCP lease from server. Connection UP.
Jan 1 00:01:04 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.97.46]
Jan 1 00:01:05 syslog: Send out NTP request to ntp1.isp.sky.com
Jan 1 00:01:05 syslog: Time has been set from ntp1.isp.sky.com
Aug 9 00:05:11 syslog: Received NTP Sync Reply from ntp1.isp.sky.com
Aug 9 00:11:49 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:11:56 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link DOWN.
Aug 9 00:11:57 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:12:04 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link DOWN.
Aug 9 00:12:06 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:12:08 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link DOWN.
Aug 9 00:12:09 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:12:21 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link DOWN.
Aug 9 00:12:22 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:12:23 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link DOWN.
Aug 9 00:12:24 syslog: eth2 (switch port: 1) Link UP 100 mbps full duplex
Aug 9 00:12:32 syslog: Line 0: VDSL2 link down
Aug 9 00:12:34 syslog: Clear IP addresses. IP connection DOWN.
Aug 9 00:13:41 syslog: eth2 - WAN link UP.
Aug 9 00:13:41 syslog: Received valid DHCP lease from server. Connection UP.
Aug 9 00:13:41 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 00:19:01 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 00:47:49 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 01:22:53 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 01:51:41 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 02:24:57 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 02:54:57 syslog: Send out NTP request to ntp1.isp.sky.com
Aug 9 03:00:00 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 03:32:58 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 04:07:26 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 04:39:12 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 05:11:16 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 05:37:04 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 05:37:05 syslog: Send out NTP request to ntp1.isp.sky.com
Aug 9 06:01:57 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 06:30:27 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 06:54:27 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 07:27:25 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 08:01:35 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 08:25:35 syslog: Send out NTP request to ntp1.isp.sky.com
Aug 9 08:28:51 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]
Aug 9 09:04:13 syslog: Connection Up. SNO/MAC/IP: [A502155D006292/C03E0F9F81C4/151.231.102.13]

Can not view video over the Internet on WVC80N

I set up the web cam, set up the port forward etc so now I am able to:
   1. view/change web cam settings inside my home network.
   2. view video inside my home network.
   3. view/change web cam settings over the Internet.
But I am not able to view video over Internet. Every time I did so (using IE browser), after clicking the view video button, I got an error : There are too many user connections or the device is busy, please try again latter.
Anyone has a fix on this? I set up port forwarding on port 1024 (that's how I can chage settings over Internet).
I spent 2 hours on the phone with Linksys tech support but they could not find the reason.
Thanks,
Sam

Who is your ISP? How you are trying to access your Camera from the remote location? Along with Port 1024 you need to do port forwarding for port 80 on your router for the Cameras IP address. As WVC80N works on your HTTP Port.
To access your camera from the Remote location, you need to use http://wan ip:80.

Welcome to the Voice and Video over WLAN Discussion

Welcome to the Cisco Networking Professionals Connection Wireless Forum. This conversation will provide you the opportunity to discuss issues surrounding Voice and Video over WLAN. We encourage everyone to share their knowledge and start conversations on issues such as bandwidth intensive wireless applications, and any other topic concerning Voice and Video over WLAN.
Remember, just like in the workplace, be courteous to your fellow forum participants. Please refrain from using disparaging or obscene language or posting advertisements.
We encourage you to tell your fellow networking professionals about the site!
If you would like us to send them a personal invitation simply send their names and e-mail addresses along with your name to us at [email protected]

This is easily done with dial peer statements . The dial peer in your originating router must route the calls to the terminating router first. That would look like :
dial-peer voice xxxxx voip ( the xxxxx is just a tag)
destination-pattern 45... (that would route any 5-digit calls beginning with 45)
session-target ipv4:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx (ip address of the terminating router)
If digitones are to be dialed after the connection is established, use the statement:
dtmf-relay-h.245-alphanumeric
You could also use a statement to specify the codec to be used:
codec g711ulaw
You would need multiple voip dial peers if the calls were going to different routers based on the dialed digits. If all calls are sent to the same terminating router, use all wild cards in the dest-pattern statement.
At the terminating router configure pots dial peers:
dial-peer voice xxxxx pots
dest-pattern 45...
port x/x (whichever port the call is to be terminated on)
prefix 45 (this re-inserts matched digits which are stripped off by the pots dp)
Repeat for other ports which will receive calls.
Paul

Video Over Low Speed Link

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for