Viewer Looking Different than Designer

Hi. I've upgraded version from CrystalViewer10 to CrystalViewer11. I have 2 question to ask. 1. Currently I used CrystalViewer11. I've created a report using Cross tab wizard. I used function DisplayString to display my recordnumber in crosstab. The recordnumber (in DisplayString formula) are print out well in desinger..1,2,3,4,5...10.Anyhow..it does not happened in viewing. The result printing just 1,1,1,1,1,1...1. Did I miss something class / component? 2. In CrystalViewer10, while viewing the report, I can export to PDF but it does not happened after I've change to CrystalViewer11. The result are print out with condition (problem no 1) & come out this error while trying to convert. <img src="/C:%5CDocuments%20and%20Settings%5CAdministrator%5CMy%20Documents%5CMy%20Pictures%5Cerror_pdf" alt=" " /> Error: com.crystaldecisions.reports.a.a(Ljava/util/Properties;)V Please kindly advise.-AN-

Try adding a copy merged layer to the top of the stack before flaterning (Shift Alt Ctrl e)

Similar Messages

Published Page Looks different than designed in IWeb

It's the oddest thing... I designed the site, using a blank template and building it from scratch. Every page displays fine, except for this one. It looks perfect in IWeb, but when published, even to my desktop folder, certain parts of two text boxes are transparent, showing the background behind it.
Here is the link to the page so you can see what I'm talking about:
http://www.terrybowdenfootballcamp.com/AboutTheCamps.html
Any ideas? Any help is GREATLY appreciated!
Thanks
Kim in FL

It appears that on the About the Camp page your text boxes don't have the fill enabled as they do in the other pages letting the page background show thru. Try clearing the text boxes and reapplying the fill. Or copy a text box from another page, replace the text with that of a problem box and see if that will fix it.
Another general fix would be to close iWeb, delete the iWeb preference file, com.apple.iWeb.plist, reboot the computer and try again.
OT
Message was edited by: Old Toad

Look different in Design view and Browser Preview

Why do it look different in Design view and Browser
Preview?

"MA_DAVIDLEE" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:e39mte$las$[email protected]..
> thank you for reply and the url is www.cipr.com.tw. you
can see the
> navigation position is different in Design view. Thank
you!
>
How could I see the Design view? Can you post a
screenshot?

Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
[IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

Colors in FCP looks different than when playing in QT7

The colors of the video's in FCP looks different than when playing back in QuickTime. I wonder if it can be a color management setting in FCP? I have the same problem when playing a clip in AE. I have two FCP machines, but only one of them is having this problem. Any ideas of what I can do to get the right colors back?

Have you enabled Final Cut Studio Color Compatibility in the QT Player preferences?

The way Aperture renders my Nikon RAW (NEF) files look different than...

The was Aperture renders my NEF files looks different than NX...
Ok so I use all the in camera setting/tools to the best of abilities to try and cut my editing down as much as possible but when shooting RAW I end up having to tweak every images to get them back to what they really look like... I shoot often RAW and JPG combined and when I open a NEF in NX and a JPG in PS they are identical and need very little work, when I use Aperture the NEF files are very different looking from the JPG (or NEF in NX) and every single one needs tweaking (I get more redish/pinkish skin, often a hint of green cast to (slightly off WB/tone thing) and more contrast.
Below is screenshot showing the difference between a JPG (or NEF in NX) and a RAW file in Aperture
[img]http://www.pbase.com/ray645/image/120052970/original.jpg[/img]
This is just a silly snap shot in very flat overcast light, and has the least amount of shift or difference of any image type so far, when I use strobes, shoot for a more contrasty image, gel for color and manual WB the differences are huge almost to the point that you would think you where looking at two completely different images and not the same NEF opened in different software.
How do I go about getting Aperture to render my NEF's more like what I shot like NEF in NX, JPG in anything, and even the back of the camera screen?

Thank you, that seems like will work, just having the boost turned down a bit on import has helped tremendously but I cant stop feeling like I am moving towards the "Fix it in post" mentality
I will need to get better at tweaking my images... No matter how I try I cant kill the pinking skin or the very faint green glow in blond hair or bright neutral tones without affecting other areas of the image.. I am sure I will figure it out but anyone having any tips or links that could speed up my process I would appreciate it.
The green is weird its like someone snuck a small florescent light into all my shoots without telling me, not major but enough to be annoying.
I shoot a ton of motor sports (3000 images a weekend) and shoot JPG and have gotten good at using in camera pre sets, knowing what I got and getting it right in the camera, I wish Nikon would give up the code or whatever is needed for all the info to be carried over to Aperture..... I would pay the $100 or whatever to use the NX engine in Aperture

Lightroom Image Looks Different than in Windows Viewer/CS5/etc.

I've seen this discussed elsewhere, but I believe the nature of my issue may be a bit different, so please excuse the repeat inquiry.
I'm currently using Lightroom 3 on a 17' Samsung Syncmaster 920NW on two different desktops. The hardware configuration for each machine is also identical, with only a few minor exceptions. However, the images on one machine display drastically differently in Lightroom, as opposed to any other Windows application. I've updated the video drivers for both computers, reinstalled the monitor drivers for both, and have uninstalled/reinstalled Lightroom on both with no success in remedying the discrepancy.
Any assistance would be greatly appreciated in finding a solution to this issue. It's very frustrating to be anchored down to one desktop due to the inconsistencies of the other.
Thanks!

You need to calibrate both monitors to identical settings, the luminance value being very important, using an appropriate calibration tool and software.
Spyder Elite software has a specific settings too enable you to match monitors across machines in a studio setting, or from a desk top to a laptop. Without calibration images in viewed in colour managed applications will always look different. If you do not wish to colour manage you can always set a colour space such as sRGB as a monitor profile on all the machines, the only difference you will see then will be down to the luminance value of the monitor. However this will mean images viewed on other peoples screens may differ markedly from your own. The real solution to colour problems is to use colour management and this means calibration of your monitor as a basic requirement.

Duplicate version looks different than original -- same adjustments

This morning I imported a few photos (D70 RAW), found they looked good with the default processing (no adjustments applied other than the default RAW 1.1 processing), and created duplicate versions to crop to different sizes. The duplicate versions look different -- the dark areas of the photos are lighter and noisier (sorry, still learning proper photo terminology). The duplicate versions have the identical adjustments (none). I tried toggling the cropping on/off, and the duplicate versions still look different.
This is very odd... has anybody else experienced this?
iMac 24" 2.16GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2.0 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB Nikon D70

I did a little more investigation on this issue, and found that when I make the duplicate version, the image still looks identical. It is when I crop the image that things get messed up -- even if I then remove the crop adjustment.

920 cartridge looks different than the old one

I just bought some new ink cartridges for my Officejet 6500a 710n-z printer. I bought the same 920 XL cartridges that I have bought and successfully installed before. However, the most recent ones would not install!
These new cartridges are different than the others -- on the bottom, they only have the gold-colored contact plate. The others had the gold plate and a little bubble-like item that I think was called an ink window. Other than that, the cartridges are exactly the same.
Have these cartridges changes? What do I need to do to make them work in my printer?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello BezaNH,
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
Sorry to hear about the issues with the Officejet 6500 not reading the new generation cartridges. I believe I found a document that may help you resolve this.
Some steps you will have done such as, remove and install cartridges, I would still suggest following through with all the steps. The images of the cartridges are that of the older generations cartridges, the steps are the same regardless.
'The following ink cartridge appears to be missing or damaged' Error Message Displays on the Printer....
Let me know how those steps work out, I will be keeping an eye on the thread.
JERENDS
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

Circular loop in question slide even though branching view looks different

I'm having a bit of trouble getting captivate to do something
every simple. I need to ask a few short yes/no questions if the
user answers "No" to all then they get redirected to a web address.
If they answer yes they get a different slide that points them to
the contact details.
My problem is that no matter what answer I give for the
questions I end up getting sent to the contacts slide. The
branching view looks like it should do what I need.
Is there a way of telling from the XML export if there is a
problem with the source?

Hmm... that's a weird one.
Does your "failure" slide comes before the "success" slide in
your project? If not, try switching them around and see if that
fixes things.
Otherwise, I'm wondering if it's not an issue of the Quiz
preferences being too limiting to ever get to the "failure" slide.
Depending on the order your slides appear in, Captivate may not be
allowed to go to the "failure" slide.
Quiz navigation issues typically result from the settings in
the Quiz preferences being incorrect. I'd try setting the quiz to
Optional in the Quiz preferences and then play with some of the
other settings to see if that helps.

Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box. But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different. The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for. Here is a link to a pic.

Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked. I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
I wouldn't expect anything less from them. It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out. If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box. The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

Format text (Preview is different than Design)

On my WIP site I cannot get the text in one box center aligned. It looks fine in Design but not in Preview or online. Have tried everything I can think of.
Please look at brownelllibrary.businesscatalyst.com on the page "About Us" under Limits and Loan periods and lt me know how to solve this problem.
Thank you.

Hi,
When you edit the text of the text box you can press 'Ctrl+A' on windows or 'Command+A' on MAC to select all the text. That way you can determine the empty spaces. I'm afraid that in Muse you can't get the spaces to display like the way it does in Word.
Check this screen shot,
I have pointed out the spaces in the text editor.
Regards,
Abhishek Maurya

'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play' (makes timing errors)

In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play' Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.

You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option.

Why would the browser preview display look different than what I am seeing in the design view? Pls help!

When working with accordion panels, when I first insert the widget it looks fine, then I begin customizing the content and then the Preview display does not look the same as the Design display. For instance, in the design display the panel aligns with the adjacent image, but in Preview, it appears offset by one or two pixels.

Hi,
Please take a look at this post with similar discussion : Re: What I see in Design mode is not the same in Preview mode. ?
Regards,
Aish

How come that the design mode looks different than preview mode with slideshows?

hello,
I am placing a slideshow on the site. when I look in the preview mode the slideshow is not exactly in the same place.
How come? Am I doing somthing wrong?
thanks for response

Welcome to the medium that is the web. Every browser has it's own text layout engine and "web-safe" fonts are a misnomer. You cannot rely on text line breaking the same in different browsers. Thus creating text frames that snuggly fit the text within is likely to result in what's occurring on your site in some browsers or browser versions.
As a general rule, you should attempt to use Web Fonts whenever you can. Use "Web Safe" fonts as a second choice. And only use System fonts as a last resort and only for small amounts of text (since they become an image when output).
If you want a specific portion of text to absolutely never go to two lines, you'll want to put it in a text frame that significantly wider than the text so when the line length varies the text doesn't wrap to a new line.
"Web Safe" fonts are not a single font but actually a list/stack of fonts where the browser goes through the list until it finds a font that's available on the current viewer's device. The fonts in the list/stack are similar in visual appearance and font metrics, but any difference in font metrics is sufficient to result in changes in line breaks, so when using web safe fonts you need to account for much larger variations in line length and line breaking than will occur when using a Web Font.

Viewer Looking Different than Designer

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for