Vintage Warmer 2 and Logic issue...

Well, it seems that if I have the plug-in delay compensation turned OFF then the vintage warmer2 works fine on instrument or buss tracks. But if I have plug-in delay compensation turned ON, then I get weird things happening like the notes sounding like they're playing faster and then slowing down or notes being skipped entirely in the beginning. Anyone have experience with this? The problem is that by turning off the delay compensation it helps VW2 but screws up other plugins of mine. Why is this only a problem for VW2?

Let me clarify the "working fine" really means that there's still pops and clicks when the track starts playing, but at least the notes aren't being skipped or speeding up or slowing down. I've never seen anything like it. If I turn plug-in delay compensation ON, I get one set of problems and if I turn it OFF, I get a different set of problems. I want to buy this so badly, but I definitely don't want the nightmare of using it if this is how it behaves.
EDIT:
I just read something very interesting in the Logic manual that states "Plug-in Delay compensation is useful for DSP cards (Powercore, UAD1, etc...). It recommends turning OFF the delay compensation if no DSP card is being used. Maybe that's why VW2 works fine with compensation turned off?

Similar Messages

  • EW Hollywood Strings and Logic issues

    I've just bought EW Hollywood Strings and when I try enable it in Audio unit manager is keep coming up with Validation crashed. What am I doing wrong?

    Uninstall everything (EWQL and Hollywood) and reinstall just the PLAY Audio Unit. Then load Logic and authorize with your iLok or over the net, then close Logic and install Hollywood strings.
    I did this with Platinum Pro, what caused it for me was installing PLAY with Logic open at the time.

  • Digi 002r and Logic issue

    I there, Im sorry to post this here but I really dont know were else to find answers. Im stucked with a really nice digi 002r modified by black lion (the signature series, yes). That make this card a jewel, but I cant seem to make it work on my new mac.
    => I dont find the digidesign techsupport center
    => I dont find a proper way to install it. So far Ive tried the 002003_driversv90, wich is made especially for this soundcard model, but it dosent seems like it work. Ive also tried the coreAudio installer v803 wich is the most recent installer and is suppose to work fine on intel but when I turn the soundcard "on" even tho the Digidesign CoreAudio Manager status shows "002R connected @ 44,1K", I cant switch my master computer sound to the 002R, but I can use it in Logic (better than nothing).
    Mayby someone here know how to contact digidesign techsupport, or better, know a trick set the master out of the computer to the 002R?
    Message was edited by: arsene greenman

    And read this ...
    http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/500575-digidesign-002 -rack-logic-9-a.html

  • PSP Vintage Warmer 2 vs. Nomad Factory Analog Signature Pack

    Hello,
    I love my MacBook Pro DP 2.0ghz system running Logic Express. I am finding, however, that I need an analog "fattener" to make my tracks and mixes sound richer and more "old skool."
    Based upon my budget, I have narrowed down my choices to these two:
    PSP VintageWarmer 2 and
    Nomad Factory Analog Signature Pack
    Engineers seem to tilt in the direction of the PSP, but I think the Nomad stuff is just a little less well-known. Do any of you have direct experience with both plug-ins and can offer your opinions? I have posted similar questions on both the Nomad Factory and PSP forums, but I should have a less biased set of responses from this community, I would think.
    Thank you,
    Bart of DIS
    MacBook Pro Dual Core 2.0ghz w/2GB RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   FCP, DVDSP, Logic Express, Adobe CS

    Well, I have spent a few hours demoing PSP Vintage Warmer and the Nomad Factory Analog Signature Pack. Here are my first impressions:
    1) The Nomad interfaces do actually make more sense to me. I still have not figured out how to get to the back panel of the PSP VW yet, although I didn’t really “research” the issue much.
    2) I found that the Nomad’s analog overdriven distortion sounded very realistic. I liked the EQs, both the stand-alone and the channel strip versions. I had a goofy drum machine patch that I looped and tried these plugs on, and the EQ found life and realism in the patch that I did not think was even there.
    Having said all that, I was even more impressed with the PSP Vintage Warmer:
    3) The presets were 100x better. In fact, on the drum loop I was demoing with, EVERY preset sounded good, and better than the Nomad presets, even the clearly inappropriate ones!
    4) Instead of modeling the buzziness of overdriven tubes, the PSP seems to do better at replicating the richer and more subtle warmth of tape saturation.
    5) The PSP VW seemed to have a LOT more headroom and a LOT more depth. Things got analog fat in a hurry without tons of overdrive distortion break-up. I quickly tried it on other things, like vocals, rock guitars, B3, and bass, and found it to be extremely well-mannered, no matter what the input signal.
    I can see how most fans of Vintage Warmer claim they use it on every track. You absolutely can’t screw the thing up, even if you have no real expertise in final mixing and mastering (like me), and if you actually DO have the knowledge and bat-ears to tweak this plug, I’m sure it delivers even more.
    I still have more testing to do. My verdict is certainly not a final one, but right now my money (literally) might be on the PSP Vintage Warmer. I am using Logic, and the included EQ is great—I don’t need another, less “tweakable” one, even if it looks “vintage cool.” What I do need, however, is a plug that subtly saturates and warms the signal so that it sounds like I loaded a 2” tape 24-track Studer in a big-time expensive studio and tracked there. PSP’s Vintage Warmer nails that. With more study and experience, I might even be able to master with it, something I doubt could be done with the Analog Signature Pack.
    Please give me you opinions and feel free to smack mine down, so long as your contentions are instructive and well-informed. Thanks!
    Bart of DIS

  • Java proxy client logical port transport to Q and prod issue in target addr

    Hi All,
    I have a java proxy client having a logical port (configured using NWDS) to consume a web service in the provider system.
    In the logical port, I have given target address, and logical port name. While moving this client proxy NWDI dev track to Q and prod,
    how do I change this target address to point to Q and prod respectively. In other words, even though I am using Visual admin to configure the destination url for the logical port, to point to Q and prod, its still referring to the dev environment provider service after moving the proxy client to Q and prod. What is the suggested approach to take care of this issue
    Thx
    mike

    Hi Michael,
    I can only help from that point of view that I believe this question belongs to the forum
    Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and SAP
    Please try to raise this question there.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ervin

  • Roland TD4SX, Addictive Drums 1.5 and Logic Pro 9 issues

    I have been using AD and Logic with my Roland Drum kit for a little while now and while the automatic mapping from kit to plugin is working for the most part, Logic seems to kill the midi coming from one of the pads (the middle tom 45(A2)) and I'm not sure why. It requires me to remap this pad to another midi key to get it to work. I could only assume that Logic has taken this midi key for its own use but I have no idea how to find out what it is mapped to and how to remove that mapping. Anyone know how to debug this issue?
    I believe this is an issue with Logic specifically. The reason I know this is because that pad and the kit in its default mapping work perfectly in Ableton Live but not in Logic.

    You might find that you have inadvertently 'learned' A2 as a controller assignment. Open the *Controller Assignments* window ⌘-K, and delete the learned message that is 90 39 Lo7 (A2).
    !http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1283/4714022674_7b9b8fd4ac.jpg!

  • Logic 6 and Tiger Issue

    I just upgraded to tiger, from panther.. I'm still using logic pro 6, and after 3 days of erratic behaviour (long long start ups amongst other dialogue boxes), now it wont start up at all.
    I also use a motu 828 mkII, and have installed the latest tiger drivers for this product, to no avail.
    If anyone wants to know, i really don't think it's compatible with tiger, and although i was going to upgrade anyway as soon as i could, now i have a problem..... do i go back to panther in order to finish my tune? what a waste of time! Shame there wasnt a warning from apple..so i do it for you.

    Nathan Pangburn, "Logic 6 and Tiger Issue" #3, 11:38am Oct 26, 2005 CDT
    Be aware, there is one bug that I know of with Logic Pro 6.4 and 10.4. If you try to change a song's metronome settings, Logic will crash.
    I think that's the only known issue.
    The workaround is to create songs in 10.3 with the desired metronome settings and use them as templates in 10.4.

  • Serious issues with motu interface and logic, advice?

    i use a motu 828 mk2, updated to logic pro 7 from 6, everything worked fine for awhile. Sometimes I can spend hours playing and recording software instruments before the program malfunctions. All of a sudden the audio being played becomes out of tune and crackly, fading in and out. Then the screen of the motu begins flipping out, the faders become dim and move kinda erratic and sometimes theres letters that appear NIAG. If I save and close logic, turn off the interface then back on again the problem is gone. (actually sometimes it will work fine again and others it won't. Right now for example I will use logic for a minute and then it comes back again. I keep up on all the mac and logic updates. does my computer cause the problem to the interface or vice versa. Is the interface broke? Do I have the wrong driver?( I downloaded it from motu so I don't believe thats the case). does it have to do with the way all my folders are organized on the hard drive? Has anyone ever heard of anything like this? No? who else could I ask. motu's forum wasn't much help. I almost want to call the geek squad or something like that but I thought all you could give me some ideas. thank you for reading this. I really hope someone replies, even if it's to say which set up you have that works fine, maybe I'll reconsider mine.

    Hey, thanks for the tip. Though, that didn't work. How frustrating, The same problem has occured. Today is the fourth day in a row that I can't use logic. In the past it would act up for a day two then work again. Tuesday ( tomorrow) I'm supposed to have a recording session, It doesn't look too hopeful that this issue will be resolved. Please , if anyone has another suggestion I would greatly appreciate it. Maybe some ideas to isolate the problem. does anyone out there use an mk2? I lost my install disk and downloaded the driver from motu's website, could their universal driver be the problem? I'm getting pretty burnt out with this b/s. Maybe resetting something in logic would help. Any ideas. thank you. I think any response could help.

  • Anyone here using Metric Halo 2882 DSP and Logic 8???? I got issues....

    If you are using the Metric Halo 2882+DSP and Logic 8 please let me know as I am having some goofy issues that I need to bounce off someone that might have been thru this already....
    Thanks

    I have one. What's your problem? BTW, Metric Halo tech support is great. And they have an active and helpful mailing list([email protected]), with the developers answering questions.

  • Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 clapping and crackling issues with Logic Pro x new iMac 27"

    Hi,  I have just purchased a brand new iMac and downloaded Logic Pro x,  I also purchased the Focusrite Scarlett 2i2 interface.  I have downloaded the drivers from the focusrite website and everything is set up,  when I plug in guitar or mic I get really bad clapping and crackling to the point where the sound cuts out altogether.  I have changed buffer size and sample rates and everything else I can think of but nothing seems to fix the problem.  I also deleted the 2i2 drivers and logic and reinstalled them both but still have the same issue,  when I record using the iMac built in mic everything is fine so it's deffinately something to do with the interface.  I am waiting to hear back from Focusrite tech help.  Does anyone else have this problem?  Any help would be appreciated.

    I'm having a similar issue which might indicate that the problem is not your interface.
    Yesterday I migrated all my stuff from my 2009 iMac to a brand new iMac 27", and when I did a quick test to play back some old projects in Logic there was loads of annoying clicks and pops. My interface is a Roland Octa-Capture.
    I also noticed some weird CPU spikes from time to time, which I never had on my older, much less powerful iMac...

  • PSP Vintage Warmer update.

    Hey Guys
    finished searching the forum for more info on this.
    I was just wondering if the latency issue on the vintage warmer 2 has been
    addressed yet.
    I tried the demo (2.0.1) and when I put the warmer on a drum bus there was quite a bit of latency, no matter if the logic plug in delay compensation was on or not.
    That was the latest version I think of that plug in.
    It's quite unusable to me unless the latency gets fixed.
    I hope someone knows either how to fix this or PSP has released a newer
    version I don't know about.
    Anyway, hope they fix it soon or face mass exodus I think.
    -FTIWL

    Just use Debowelerificator version 1.78.
    It sounds much better,and has NO latency,if you use the Triturator presets.
    Cheers

  • Vintage Warmer

    Having all the dynamics plug-ins that come with Logic, do you guys think that Vintage Warmer is worth buying?
    I am very happy with my mixes : Will I be happier?

    If you are looking to make your mixes a little more analog sounding and add some subtle distortion then VW is supposed to do that. But there are some other (and free) ways to achieve similar results. If you are in particular after the sound of tape compression then you might try visiting the Noisevault website and downloading some of the free Impulse Reponses. Particularly they have some there from magnetic tape machines - I believe under the heading "Beamsonic Impulses". Load one of these babies into Space Designer set as an insert effect and it really does give you the character of magnetic tape, though it doesn't do the actual tape compression for you (you have to add a compressor in series to do that). The flavor is very convincing if that's what you are after.
    There are many IR's at this site that will do this sort of thing for you including some taken from classic tube preamps. The tritone digital forum also has some IR's like this as well although you have to join the forum to see them and download them. I don't believe you have to actually use any of their software, though.
    There are a few third party convolution plugs designed to work specifically with short IR's like these as opposed to IR's taken from rooms for reverb purposes. But Space designer is more than adequate for this task even across the output bus.
    One thing worth noting is that sometimes these free IR's aren't recorded or edited that well. Some are too long and actually add a reverb-type tail to your sound when all you should have is the millisecond or so of an 1176 or LA2A etc. Remember, you can always load the IR into a Logic audio track (it's just a wav file) and in the sample editor, do a fade out or a silencing then re-save the file. Then you have the short impulse you want. Actually, Space Designer even allows you to shorten the IR right on the spot to fix this problem. So you might not even need to do that. Basically, Space Designer is good for a whole lot more than just reverb.

  • Cache and performance issue in browsing SSAS cube using Excel for first time

    Hello Group Members,
    I am facing a cache and performance issue for the first time, when I try to open a SSAS cube connection using Excel (using Data tab  -> From Other Sources --> From Analysis Services) after daily cube refresh. In end users
    system (8 GB RAM), for the first time, it takes 10 minutes to open the cube. From next run onwards, its open up quickly within 10 secs.
    We have daily ETL process running in high end servers. The configuration of dedicated SSAS cube server is 8 core, 64GB RAM. In total we have 4 cubes - out of which for 3 is full cube refresh and 1 is incremental refresh. We have seen after
    daily cube refresh, it takes 10 odd minutes to open the cube in end users system. From next time onwards, it opens up really fast with 10 secs. After cube refresh, in server systems (16 GB RAM), it takes 2 odd minutes to open the cube.
    Is there, any way we could reduce the time taken for first attempt ?
    Best Regards, Arka Mitra.

    Thanks Richard and Charlie,
    We have implemented the solution/suggestions in our DEV environment and we have seen a definite improvement. We are waiting this to be deployed in UAT environment to note down the actual performance and time improvement while browsing the cube for the
    first time after daily cube refresh.
    Guys,
    This is what we have done:
    We have 4 cube databases and each cube db has 1-8 cubes.
    1. We are doing daily cube refresh using SQL jobs as follows:
    <Batch xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine">
    <Parallel>
    <Process xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ddl2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2" xmlns:ddl2_2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2003/engine/2/2" xmlns:ddl100_100="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2008/engine/100/100" xmlns:ddl200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200" xmlns:ddl200_200="http://schemas.microsoft.com/analysisservices/2010/engine/200/200">
    <Object>
    <DatabaseID>FINANCE CUBES</DatabaseID>
    </Object>
    <Type>ProcessFull</Type>
    <WriteBackTableCreation>UseExisting</WriteBackTableCreation>
    </Process>
    </Parallel>
    </Batch>
    2. Next we are creating a separate SQL job (Cache Warming - Profitability Analysis) for cube cache warming for each single cube in each cube db like:
    CREATE CACHE FOR [Profit Analysis] AS
    {[Measures].members}
    *[TIME].[FINANCIAL QUARTER].[FINANCIAL QUARTER]
    3. Finally after each cube refresh step, we are creating a new step of type T-SQL where we are calling these individual steps:
    EXEC dbo.sp_start_job N'Cache Warming - Profit Analysis';
    GO
    I will update the post after I receive the actual im[provement from UAT/ Production environment.
    Best Regards, Arka Mitra.

  • Internal table logic issue

    Hi All,
    I have one logical issue related to internal table manipulation.
    I have one internal table :
    I_DAT - This is related to Loading/Unloading of Goods.
    for example with 3 fields
    VSTEL, KUNNA, KMMANG.
    Now suppose my data looks like this after sorting:
    VSTEL   KUNNA    KMMANG
    100       -        -
    200       -        -
    300       -        -
    400       -        -
    -         500      X
    -         600      X
    -         700      X
    -         800      X
    Here 100,200,300,400 are Loading points.
    ANd 500,600,700,800 are unloading points.
    Now what i want is For loading & Unloading points i need to pick up Address and print one after other.
    But how they need to print is:
    FOR INITIAL LOADING OF
    ADDRESS- For 100
    FIRST STOP: FOR LOADING OF
    ADDRESS- For 200
    SECOND STOP: FOR LOADING OF
    ADDRESS- For 300
    Etc .....
    Then
    FOR UNLOADING OF:
    ADDRESS- For 400
    FIRST STOP: FOR UNLOADING OF
    etc.
    FINAL STOP: FOR FINAL UNLOADING OF
    We might get as many records :
    Can any body give me the logic:
    Printing Address is not a problem:
    But Above every address we need to print FIRST STOP, SECOND etc like that.
    For this i need logic.
    Can anybody give the solution!
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Prasad.

    Try this.I think you want output like this......
    DATA: BEGIN OF LINE,
            CARRID   TYPE SBOOK-CARRID,
            CONNID   TYPE SBOOK-CONNID,
            FLDATE   TYPE SBOOK-FLDATE,
            CUSTTYPE TYPE SBOOK-CUSTTYPE,
            CLASS    TYPE SBOOK-CLASS,
            BOOKID   TYPE SBOOK-BOOKID,
          END OF LINE.
    DATA ITAB LIKE SORTED TABLE OF LINE WITH UNIQUE KEY TABLE LINE.
    SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE CUSTTYPE CLASS BOOKID
           FROM SBOOK INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB.
    LOOP AT ITAB INTO LINE.
      AT FIRST.
        WRITE / 'List of Bookings'.
        ULINE.
      ENDAT.
        AT NEW CARRID.
          WRITE: / 'Carrid:', LINE-CARRID.
        ENDAT.
          AT NEW CONNID.
            WRITE: / 'Connid:', LINE-CONNID.
          ENDAT.
            AT NEW FLDATE.
              WRITE: / 'Fldate:', LINE-FLDATE.
            ENDAT.
              AT NEW CUSTTYPE.
                WRITE: / 'Custtype:', LINE-CUSTTYPE.
              ENDAT.
                   WRITE: / LINE-BOOKID, LINE-CLASS.
                AT END OF CLASS.
                  ULINE.
                ENDAT.
    ENDLOOP.
    This is also helpful......
    LOOP AT <itab>.
      AT FIRST. ... ENDAT.
        AT NEW <f1>. ...... ENDAT.
          AT NEW <f2 >. ...... ENDAT.
              <single line processing>
          AT END OF <f2>. ... ENDAT.
        AT END OF <f1>. ... ENDAT.
      AT LAST. .... ENDAT.
    ENDLOOP.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • MacBook Pro Health and safety issue: Potential Burn during normal use

    Hi,
    I am not a complainer. I worked for Apple of 6+ years and have had a top of the line Apple Notebook since Apple created the concept of the laptop notebook.
    I recently experienced a 3rd degree burn using my MacBook Pro that I think Apple needs to warn folks about:
    MacBook Pro 17"
    Machine Model: MacBookPro1,2
    CPU Type: Intel Core Duo
    Number Of Cores: 2
    CPU Speed: 2.16 GHz
    L2 Cache (shared): 2 MB
    Memory: 2 GB
    Bus Speed: 667 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: MBP12.0061.B00
    Serial Number: ()
    SMC Version: 1.5f10
    Sudden Motion Sensor:
    State: Enabled
    I had my laptop on my lap. I was wearing shorts. It noticed that it was warm on my leg where the left side of the MacBook Pro was touching my leg, but it didn't create a reflex pain response.
    Upon completing my session, when I closed the machine and put it away, I noticed a 1 inch x .75 inch blister on my leg where it had been touching the MacBook/Pro; and it has turn out to be a significant burn.
    I checked all the documentaiton that came with my MacBook Pro and there was no warning about the potential of this situation.
    I recommend that Apple let owners know, perhaps through an email or a popup when they visit the Apple site. Lastly, when I encountered this issue, I wasn't running any high performance, compute bound applications. It was email. So, I have to believe that it is possible to detect wait states within the processes running and take the processors to a low power mode of operation when they are not performing actual work. Am I out in left field here?
    I want Apple to be successful. I haven't heard of a similar complaint on any of the high performance PC's at work. Beyond a Health and Safety issue, this is also a reputation issue. Better to face into the storm and honestly deal with this issue.
    A slightly crisp, but loyal, MacBook Pro user.
    Mike Doherty
    MacBook Pro Mac OS X (10.4.5) Potential Health and Safety Issue- 3rd degreee burn potential under normal use

    Mike... I do sympathize with your situation but let me correct you:
    I recently experienced a 3rd degree burn using my
    MacBook Pro
    Do you know what a 3rd degree burn is? A 3rd degree burn involves the dermis, and is full thickness involving the subcutaneous tissues and fat underneath your skin layers. This is something that usually happens when man meets fire, electrocution, and chemical burns. A 3rd degree burn is not typically achieved by a simple transfer of energy by conduction, unless extreme heat for an extended period of time.
    I had my laptop on my lap. I was wearing shorts. It
    noticed that it was warm on my leg where the left
    side of the MacBook Pro was touching my leg, but it
    didn't create a reflex pain response.
    Reflex pain response? Don't try to make up medical terminology. You didn't feel it much like you don't feel the sun when you get a sunburn initially... your skin slowly adjusted to the temperature, and at some point the heat increased over the threshold of which causes damage. You should have gone to the doctor if you were overly concerned.
    Upon completing my session, when I closed the machine
    and put it away, I noticed a 1 inch x .75 inch
    blister on my leg where it had been touching the
    MacBook/Pro; and it has turn out to be a significant
    burn.
    You're right, if you have a 1inch by almost 1 inch heat related blister on your leg, it is bad, nothing that I would consider significant. That is less then 1% of your body, probably about 0.25% to 0.5%, and only a 2nd degree burn. Your most significant complication would be a local skin infection.
    I checked all the documentaiton that came with my
    MacBook Pro and there was no warning about the
    potential of this situation.
    Actually... I'd hate to call you a liar, but I'm pretty sure that it does warn about burns.
    To confirm this, apple has also information online:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=30612
    I recommend that Apple let owners know, perhaps
    through an email or a popup when they visit the Apple
    site.
    They do... link above.
    Lastly, when I encountered this issue, I wasn't
    running any high performance, compute bound
    applications. It was email. So, I have to believe
    that it is possible to detect wait states within the
    processes running and take the processors to a low
    power mode of operation when they are not performing
    actual work. Am I out in left field here?
    No, you're definitely not. Here's where I start to agree with you. For the computer to heat up that much, when not doing things like rendering video is abnormal, and you deserve to have apple check out your computer. I think you should contact them on this concern.
    I want Apple to be successful. I haven't heard of a
    similar complaint on any of the high performance PC's
    at work. Beyond a Health and Safety issue, this is
    also a reputation issue. Better to face into the
    storm and honestly deal with this issue.
    It's harder for other manufacturers... our computers are aluminum, designed to disperse the heat. Technically they are considered "portables" not laptops, but I don't get into that argument because I disagree with the word "portable"... it's meant to work on your lap, and if you can't comfortably using regular apps, you deserve an answer.
    A slightly crisp, but loyal, MacBook Pro user.
    Hey, at least you're taking it with some humor. It's a shame you had to get hurt as a result of your computer. If I were you I would have gone to your Primary Care Physician, documented the burn, and returned your computer for a new one, and for something say, a free iPod for your pain.
    Sorry you got hurt, I think you should have your heat issue professionally investigated through apple care

Maybe you are looking for