Virtual copies are invisible to me in LR 4.3

When I create virtual copies, the total number of instances of the image goes up but I don't see any of the virtual images. I unstack and it shows they're unstacked and "1 of 2" but I still can't see the other. I've turned off all filters and still nothing.
It was happening in 4.3rc and is still happening in 4.3. It is only present in certain catalogs.

jasonjmp2 wrote:
I would have thought that when you are in the Libary in a collection and you make a virtual copy, LR would automatically add the copy to the collection that contains it's Master.
Yes, that is the expected procedure. The VC should be added to the collection automatically if it is created while working in the collection. And I never had a problem with this.
For all of you who have problems with VCs not showing where they are expected:
This could be due to a corrupt Preference File. This file can go "funny" and is then responsible for all kinds of strange behavior of Lr. The remedy is replacing the Preference File.
See here for where to find the Preference file for your OS: http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/preference-file-locations-lightroo m-4.html
See here for how to go about Replacing the Preference File: http://lightroomers.com/replacing-the-lightroom-preference-file/745/

Similar Messages

  • Virtual copies are not synchronized in a second Lightroom catalogue although metadata are written in XMP and synchronization with metadata was selected

    Dear community,
    I operate one Mac with Lightroom 5.7 that is configured to store all metadata in xmp files. The Lightroom catalogue is stored locally on the Mac and only contains references to the images and their xmp files that are stored on a network device. There is another Mac with the same configuration having a separate local Lightroom catalogue and access to the same images on the network device.
    At a starting point, both Lightroom catalogues are identical - they refer to the same images on the network device and contain the same metadata.
    When I update image properties on the first Mac, these changes are reflected in the xmp file. After using the option "synchronize" with activated "metadata synchronization" on the second Mac, the modified image properties are visible on the second Mac. This is fine.
    However, when I create a virtual copy on the first Mac, I realize that the corresponding xmp file gets updated. However, even after synchronization, the virtual copy is not visible on the second Mac. I may modify image properties of the original image and get these modifications replicated to the second Mac, but the virtual copies remain on the first Mac.
    What needs to be done that also virtual copies get synchronized?
    Thank you very mich for your support.
    Best regards,
    Peter

    I do not doubt that File Export / File Import will work to transfer the virtual copies.
    My question was related to the fact whether the imported folder should not previously exist on the second Mac.
    Consider the following situation:
    time = 0:
    first Mac: folder A is in a first status
    second Mac: folder A is in a first status
    time = 1:
    first Mac: folder A is in a second status, export folder A in second status
    second Mac: folder A is in a first status, import folder A in second status
    My question is: What happens with these two folder A on the second Mac? Does folder A in the Lightroom catalogue of the second Mac gets overwritten? Do I receive an error message because folder A is already present in the Lightroom catalogue?
    I understand your answer that everything will be fine on the second Mac if there is no folder A at all at the second Mac while I import the new folder A. Under this assumption, I can import folder A and it will show the second status. Clearly.
    My question is only related to the fact that there is already a folder A on the second Mac, with the same images, but with different metadata and/or virtual copies.

  • Naming Presets for Virtual Copies and PS Edits

    I'm new to Lightroom 4.1 and have been setting everything up... I'm having trouble with figuring out an efficient, clear naming system  to distnguish  Virtual Copies and Copies Edited in Photoshop. I tried using the "File Template Editor in the external Editing window... but I find it VERY confusing. Can anyone recommend a system and the way to enter it as a Preset in the File Template Editor.
    My Image File Naming is as follows:   KOBRIEN_YY_00001.dng 
    Thanks in advance for all suggestions!

    Best to set the Rename Template from within the 'External Editing' panel of Lr Preferences. The format should be along the lines shown in screenshot. You add the custom text after the template has been saved.
    Above should work OK for photos edited in Photoshop, but Virtual Copies are a different beast and can't be renamed using templates. If you do try it the master is renamed, not the copy. The thing is, VCs must have the same base name as the master. However, you can manually edit the Copy Name field in Library Metadata panel.

  • Fix stacks or decouple them from Virtual Copies

    Stacking is too limited if it can only be used in a generic folder views without using keywords or criteria to also filter the images down. Worse, virtual copies seem to be accessible only via stacking. So when stacking is disabled then virtual copies are inaccessible and you can't even tell they exist! LR should either allow access to virtual copies without stacking so they can be accessed anytime OR expand stacks to work all the time OR AT LEAST grey out the create virtual copy command when stacking isn't permitted so we don't sit there creating virtual copies and then can't access them and wonder why not. It's taken me two days to sort out this limitation all the while thinking that I had shut stacking off and/or that LR was broken.

    Stacking is very limited indeed! This is one of the main reasons why I moved away from iPhoto.
    Photo Books in the Aperture trial, better keyword handling and better Stacking are what is making me want to eBay LR and go with AP.

  • Virtual copies and smart collections

    Previous answer not satisfactory.
    Are virtual copies considered by LR to be the same image. Then why have them. They are different especially after I add more processing.
    Therefore when i make a smart collection of aspect = square and rating is 3
    all versions should show up. Not the way it seems to work   LR5.7 on Mac 10.9
    Then I sort at top for 2014 and select to go into a regular collection Best squares of 2014.
    As it works now it is useless because I have to rely on memory to know I made a different version based on a virtual copy.
    I consider this a bug... Again read my other post today.
    If all you can do in collection is just the easy filters what is the point. I can do it manually.
    If this take rocket scientist to code an algorithm to figure out virtual copies are different than originals then get them on it ASAP.
    This is what gets me. If you know they don't work put it right out front on the help page what IT DOESN"T DO. BE HONEST
    YOU are getting paid for that. Why should a customer have to waste his time when feature is obviously deficient.

    Disclaimer: I have no idea what you're talking about, nor did I read your other post today. That said, here are a couple of points which may be pertinent:
    * Virtual copies are 100% different photos (in the catalog database, in collections, etc..).
    * Internally, the main difference between a virtual copy and a real copy is that the virtual copy omits the associated file and records the associated (master) photo instead.
    PS - I recommend understanding how it works before jumping to conclusions about how it doesn't..
    Note: be aware that there are master-photo/virtual-copy attribute filters in the library module (which remain active in develop module..).

  • How does LR3 handle virtual copies and xmp files?

    Hi,
    I see only 1 xmp file and yet I have several virtual copies of that same photograph... where are the corresponding xmp files? I am using exiftool to place some info in the CR2 files and then need to update the corresponding xmp file...
    Thanks,
    Juan

    Hi Juan,
    Virtual copies are only stored in the LR catalog, never in the XMP sidecars. If you update the XMP using exiftool and update the metadata in LR, both the original and the virtual copy will be updated with the XMP data.
    Marc

  • Can you retrieve deleted virtual copies from Lightroom?

    Hello,
    I removed a catalog from LR3 and re-imported it and my develop settings are intact however, my virtual copies are all missing. Is there a way to get those copies re-imported back into LR or could they be in a cache file somewhere on my computer?
    Help!!!
    AlikMc

    That depends on your OS and/or if you did change the defaults.
    Look here: http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/843/cpsid_84313.html

  • I cant see my virtual copies on Lightroom

    I try to create virtual copies in LR, but they are NOT visible, all filter and flags are off. Any help?

    "Not visible,..."   Where may I ask?  Lightroom Library? Windows/Mac File Explorer?
    Virtual copies are only ever visible within Lightroom.
    Pressing [S] will toggle "stack"s on/off for all VCs of the one master image thumbnail. Try pressing [S]
    "all filter and flags are off.."  does that include the "Kind" icons at the end of the 'Attributes' filter tool bar?

  • Virtual copies and DNG files

    I may have completely misunderstood something, but I thought the metadata in a DNG file was contained within the file. The virtual copy function in LR1 is very interesting for making different versions of the same image, but if the image metadata for the virtual copies is in XMP files, does this preclude the use of this function with DNG files?
    Martin

    Thanks. So the XMP metadata block in a DNG file will just contain any non-destrictive edits made on the original file. The information about any edits in virtual copies are then in accompanying files (XML?). Or is this information only contained within the Lightroom database?
    I am just trying to understand how the information is stored and if it is accessible to other applications.
    Martin

  • Virtual Copies did not import with images

    I imported a large group of images from last October and 14 of them had virtual copies created from them, mainly the final copies of images I was using. When imported into a new catalog I created in Lightroom 4 beta, only the raw files came over, not the virtual copies. I do notice that they have all been updated to the 2012 process and I did not tell it to do that. Could this be the problem and do I need to remove and reimport them? This could be a big problem for me as I really like to use Virtual Copies. Thanks for your help.

    Virtual copies are kept only in the Catalogue. They won't be in the xmp data of the master files. They will, however be in the converted catalogue that you'll get when you start using the release version of LR4.
    The other problem (all 2012 process version) seems like it was probably caused by your not writing out the metadata into your master files while they were part of your LR3 catalogue. You might need to do that in LR3 and re-import in LR4.
    Note: it's a bad idea to use the same master files in each catalogue. Make copies and import those in LR4. Much safer.
    Hal

  • Are Virtual Copies saved in Backups? How do I insert a backup into an existing catalog?

    Are Virtual Copies saved in Backups? How do I insert a backup into an existing catalog
    I deleted a tif image file that I didn't intend to, which had several LR virtual copies created from it. The virtual copies had a lot of important history that document my print preparation edits. Are these virtual copies saved in the LR backups?
    If so, how can I insert them into the catalog I am using? I have made a lot of edits in the two days since my last backup and don't want to lose that history either. Do you suggest I make a current backup before retrieving files from my last backup? I know I'm supposed to go to the backup location and open the last backup, but how do I blend that with the current work from the last 2 days?
    Any help would be most appreciated. Thanks, Tom

    Rob,
    That was exactly what I was after. However, I'm still having trouble getting the virtual copies imported. The master file was in my trash, I restored it to the original hard drive folder. Before I got your message I re- imported it to LR but of course LR came up with a new name since I was importing from and saving it to the same folder in LR. And of course no copies. This may have been a mistake, but before starting the procedure you described, I re-named the master file (it seemed that the import from backup would re-create it so I didn't want  a conflict).
    Then I did what you said and used the 'Import From Another Catalog' feature. I found the virtual copies in the backup and checked them. But when the import completed, the it gave me file names  xxx/Copy1, xxx/Copy2 but there was no image or history or metadata. When I tried to find the folder containing the files, it said it couldn't be found. So I missed something in the settings. When I tried again, there was a warning saying the file(s) exists in the catalog and its settings differ. I went ahead anyway and the message I got was "No Photos in previous import"
    Here's what the import from backup shows:
    A box with catalog contents and all the folders and files within them, that you can check.
    A New Photos section, which gives 2 file handling choices: a)add new photos to the catalog without moving them or b) don't import new photos
    A Changed existing photos section with 2 replace options: a) nothing or b) Metadata and develop setting only. If you choose this you can check a box to preserve old settings as a virtual copy.
    Not sure what to do. I changed the master file back to its original name, but that didn't make a difference. Suggestions? Thanks, Tom

  • Can not find virtual copies in Windows folder.

    I can not remember to have encountered this before, so here I go: I just created a virtual copy of some photos from my summer holiday, and all works well. But when I needed to access these photos going the Windows' way (Windows/My Pictures that is), the virtual copies do not appear in my YYYYMM folder. Going back to LR though, they will appear there with a /Copy 1 extension. RIghtclicking the VC, then "Show in Explorer" will highlight the original in the folder, the VC still not being there. Part of the frustration is that I can not remember this happening before (or maybe it has), so I'm wondering if I by accident have changed any settings.
    Running LR 4.1 on Windows 7 64-bit.
    Thanks in advance.

    Andrew Rodney wrote:
    richardplondon wrote:
    My only point, was an observation that there is very little actual practical difference between a virtual copy and a "master" ANYWAY.
    So you have 1 master (an actual raw) and 10 VC’s. What happens to the VC’s if the master gets corrupted?
    If your master has say Adobe Standard as the DNG Profile but the VC has a custom DNG profile, what happens to the VC if that profie goes missing or gets corrupted? Try it.
    If by "master", you mean the Raw file on disk, then if that is corrupted (something I have never yet experienced IIRC; although I still backup against this possibility) then certainly, all images derived from that will suffer. However adding VCs does not increase the absolute risk of that. The way I was using "master", was to refer to the one LR metadata set which, unlike a VC metadata set, currently asserts a functional link to the source file. If that LR metadata set were to get corrupted, (something I have never yet experienced either IIRC, although I still backup against that possibility too) then I might be glad of a VC which I could immediately promote to that role and status instead.
    Certainly bad things may happen to a VC if a required external file is lost or changed - but these are exactly the same bad things, as if the exact same events had happened for the "master" version alongside. I do take the point that there is protection in redundancy - no question - and also that instantly written-out metadata is a useful separate backup of one's work (as I mentioned, I'd be glad if VCs could get the same thing too somehow, someday).
    One-to-many dependency on a single source file can make some good things happen too,though, which may be judged worth any potential added risks. Say deliberate changes are newly made to a Photoshop edit on which several LR image versions are based. These updates will ripple through all virtual versions automatically; whereas if these versions had instead been fully independent, the same changes would need to be made repeatedly to get the same result; assuming one wants all these versions to reflect the changes; which is (should be; needs to be) the realistic expectation, when one has opted to use a cluster of VCs in the first place.

  • No warning when deleting a Master image that is linked to Virtual Copies?!

    Scenario: I am trying to clear out old images to free up storage space, so I go back though thousands of images looking for weak . unrequired shots.
    Problem; when dealing with "mass deletions" it is near impossible to detect which images are "Master copies" from which I have any number of Virtual Copies. And when you hit delete you might well be ruining Virtual Copies without knowing it.
    Surely there is a way to warn you that pics, X, Y & Z are linked to Xcopy1, YCopy1 & Zcopy1 etc, and give you an IMAGE SPECIFIC option to see those copies and make a choice of delete the master or not? I can't beleive Adobe think its user-freindly to have people trawl through each image to check before a deletion?
    I know others have expressed similar concerns, and it seems a REALLY glaring omission in an otherwise decent ptoduct.
    Comments from Adobe staff more than welcome.

    eddybaby66 wrote:
    Your response implies that you know how another person wishes to use the product, and it is clear that you do not know this. Being so prescriptive is no way for Adobe to look at an issue like this either.
    your responce to the observation from the above forum member is a little inelegant and harsh. It is a very good way of telling you where there are VC's of images, but as you said, your methods are your own. Doing things your way and then asking for help and then biting like that is, well up to you how you reply to those offering help and positive suggestions
    I dont' expect Adobe would be so prescriptive and +1 your comment and request is a very valid one

  • Create several virtual copies at once. Looking for a workflow of exporting 650 photo's in two versions

    Hello,
    i have photographed a wedding and i have 650 finished photo's. All came from a 5Dm3 of 5Dm2. All are in raw. The color versions are ready. I have created a preset to convert all 650 edited version to B/W. The key is i will not edit the curve and other light and contrast sliders because, and cropping for that sense since these are all done already. So to make it more simple, i need to silver 650 photo;s in color and B/W. The color versions are done.
    I am looking at three workflows:
    1 create virtual copies of the 650 photo's, filter them out, apply the b/w preset/ make some small tweakes and export the B/W version
    2 export the color version to a 16 bit tiff, import those and the apply the b/w preset/ make some small tweakes and export the B/W version
    3 make an extra copy of the lightroom library and then apply the b/w preset/ make some small tweakes and export the B/W version
    In option one i do not know how to create 650 virtual copies at once. It seems i can do this only one photo at a time which is to time consuming
    In option 2 this is an extra batch and consuming me much more hard disk space
    in option three this is workable but i rather stick to one library
    Any help in this?
    Thanks!!
    Ronald

    Go to the library module, grid view. Highlight all your images and create a new collection. One of the options when you create the new collection is to make new virtual copies. The collection will consist of virtual copies of all your original files. Then, just work with the collection and create your black-and-white images. The virtual copies can be exported just like the regular images. So you can export color and black-and-white versions.

  • Location of virtual copies on a Mac

    I made virtual copies for some of my pictures in order to do different crops.
    While I can see the results in Lightroom, I am unable to see the file (or the .xmp if that's the result).
    They seem not to be located in the same folder. but where???
    Any idea?

    There are loads, see here, but they usually only read bits from the xmp data. AFAIK only LR and Bridge will read everything that LR stores in xmp, but there may be others. As it is an open format I would expect to see greater usage of it being made, as tends to happen with most Adobe developed formats, unless somebody writes a better open format, in which case Adobe adopts it and abounded its original (as has happened with PSD). In the meantime it is the only way to transfer processing data around in image files without making permanent changes to a file, so we have to live with it!

Maybe you are looking for