Virtual host _defaultVHost_ is not available

Hi,
I just installed FMS2 and placed in a dummy sharedBall
application. I can connect to the app once, but every single
connection after that one fails and I see this in the edge.00.log
file:
2006-09-14 17:04:53 26981 (i)2631213 Connection rejected by
server. Reason : Virtual host _defaultVHost_ is not available. -
2006-09-14 17:04:53 26981 (w)2641213 Connection rejected by
server. Reason : [ Server.Reject ] : Virtual host _defaultVHost_ is
not available. -
And then I see this is master.00.log
2006-09-14 17:02:00 26968 (i)2581221 Core (27589) started,
arguments : -adaptor "_defaultRoot_" -vhost "_defaultVHost_" -app
-inst -conf "/usr/local/macromedia/fms/conf/Server.xml" -name
"_defaultRoot_:_defaultVHost_::". -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (i)2581223 Core (27589) is no
longer active. -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (w)2581256 Core (27589)
_defaultRoot_:_defaultVHost_:: experienced 1 failure[s]! -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (i)2581221 Core (27726) started,
arguments : -adaptor "_defaultRoot_" -vhost "_defaultVHost_" -app
-inst -conf "/usr/local/macromedia/fms/conf/Server.xml" -name
"_defaultRoot_:_defaultVHost_::". -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (i)2581223 Core (27726) is no
longer active. -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (w)2581256 Core (27726)
_defaultRoot_:_defaultVHost_:: experienced 2 failure[s]! -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (i)2581223 Core (27589) is no
longer active. -
2006-09-14 17:02:31 26968 (i)2581223 Core (27726) is no
longer active. -
Can anyone shed some light as to why I'm getting these
failures?
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
I sent you an email, maybe it's in your spam box though.
Thanks!Dany
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 03:03:49 -0600
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Connection rejected by server
@http://forums.adobe.com/people/Chicohuman , if you are referring to your RTMFP issue that we are discussing on the other forum post, then that is entirely different from this one, because it is FMS 4.0 in your case (FMS 2.0 in this post's case) and its RTMFP in your case (RTMP in this case). Or are you saying you are also finding connection rejects with RTMP as well ?
I would like to know if the original problem of connection rejects are still happening with VHost being unavailable ?
Thank you !
>

Similar Messages

Trying to access a file from a host that is not available

If I try to access a file on a host that is not available/unreachable, it hangs up for about 5-10 minutes. Is there any way to speed this up? I am using JDK 1.4.2
String filename = "\\\\ip\\myFile.txt"; // ip address is unreachable
File f = new File(filename);
f.exists(); // hangs hereTIA,
DB
Edited by: Darth_Bane on Aug 14, 2009 9:33 PM
Edited by: Darth_Bane on Aug 14, 2009 9:34 PM

I think you can use an IP address in the File spec. Windows allows you to use the IP address rather then the hostname in a // address (UNC?) infact its faster to use the ip over the hostname (windows networking is SLOW anyway)
Why not try dertimining if the machine is connected to the network before trying to get the file? There is something in the NetworkInterface API about pinging a IP or was that in the Socket API. eitherway, i think finding out if the computer is available before the file would make sense, that way you arnt waiting arround to find out if the file on an unavailable machine isnt there when you know the machine isnt online.
Thats my two cents.

Virtual Host Mail Accounts Not Working

Hi. I have attempted to search the discussions for an answer to this, but haven't had much luck.
I have one server running 10.5.8. This server hosts 4 domains, 1 main and 3 virtual. Each domain needs an [email protected] email address. I have created a user in WGM named info and have created the short names for each domain: info (I assume the local domain short name doesn't need the domain.com added), [email protected], [email protected] and [email protected] I have entered the 3 virtual hosts in Server Admin-->Mail-->Settings-->Advanced-->Hosting-->Enable Virtual Hosting section.
The issue is that when I configure Mail for each of the accounts, they are being treated as though they are aliases and not virtual host accounts. In other words, each account sees the exact same mail. When I check Server Admin-->Mail-->Maintenance-->Accounts I do NOT see the three additional virtual host accounts, so clearly they are not being created.
This same server is also the mail server, so each domain's DNS MX record is pointing to this server. Like I said, I can send and receive mail, but it goes to all the accounts simultaneously (as aliases would) rather than individually.
I've scoured the documentation, but cannot seem to find what I have missed here to prevent this from working as it should.
Does anyone have experience with a successful deployment of a situation similar to this one?

I do, indeed, have the addresses set up for one user, as you have ascertained. I suppose that I will alter the setup in the manner in which you describe. What is completely perplexing to me is that if you review Apple's documentation just after the section after describing Mail Forwarding (~pg. 37) you will see that Apple is saying I can set it up the way I have. Directly from the text as follows:
Virtual hosting is a method you can use to host more than one domain name on the
same computer and IP address, with overlapping mail user names.
For instance, a mail server can receive mail transfer requests for two domains,
mail.example1.com and mail.example.com, both of which resolve to the same IP
address. For mail.example1.com, the server would deliver mail to “[email protected]”
to a user mailbox for “bob,” while it would also deliver mail to “[email protected]” to
a different user mailbox. Virtual hosts are essentially the converse of local host aliases.
Again, I state that if this is to be true, then I should have the ability to assign one Open Directory account and give that account the four addresses as above with each having a separate user mailbox. The way it is behaving now is like aliases, not virtual hosts as Apple describes.
I'd love to understand why this is the case, perhaps I'm completely misunderstanding the text.
Thanks again for the help, I'll just create 4 accounts, easy enough.

Virtual Host, new site not working.

OK I'm fairly techie (I write IOS/MacOS apps for a living), I just don't do web technologies. I have SL Server on my iMac running several sites prefectly on one IP.
example.com
webmail.example.com
somethingelse.com
I set up a new site thru Server Admin (clients.example.com). I keep getting "Safari can't find server."
The other sites work beautifully, my DNS settings are ok (checked via "changeip -checkhostname").
I even deleted the client site and copied webmail.example.com since that site works. I did everything I can think of (yes I checked the aliases, general system/site folder permissions, and rebooted several times). Can I only do three sites?
I really just need a list of things to try, most of the setups involve terminal and client Mac OS. It's the same, but since I created all the other sites with Server Admin, clients.example.com should be the same.

If the HTTP requests were getting to the server, the server would answer them (maybe with an inappropriate virtual site, but it'd respond). The "Safari can't find server" error indicates that the client isn't able to contact the server, i.e. a DNS, network connectivity, wrong port etc problem. In this case, since your other virtual sites are reachable, it's probably a DNS issue. "changeip -checkhostname" validates the reverse lookup of the server's primary IP address against its hostname, which isn't what you need to check here. You need to do a forward lookup of clients.example.com and make sure it resolves to the server's IP address. "host clients.example.com" is my favorite for this, although "dig clients.example.com" would give somewhat more detail.

Virtual Hosts in Apache HTTP Server

How to configure virtual hosts in Apache HTTP Server httpd.conf file.
If I want to access my server with some other name(alias), how can I do this ?
Suggestions in this matter would be highly helpful.
Thanks
Vidhyut Arora

Following is a note explaining how to setup
Virtual hosts.
Hope this helps
Ranga
Note:70647.1
Subject: Apache Server Virtual Hosting
Last Revision Date: 07-JUN-2001
PURPOSE
This document discusses considerations for setting up virtual hosts on an
Apache machine, to include how to get the hostname working and how to
configure Apache.
SCOPE & APPLICATION
The information in this document is intended for those who manage multiple sites
using an Apache machine.
REFERENCES
First published in Apache Week issue 31 (6th September 1996)
Last update 20th September 1998
Using Virtual Hosts
Virtual Hosts let you run multiple independent Web sites on a single host with
a single Apache setup.
One of the most important facilities in Apache is its ability to run virtual
hosts. This is now the essential way to run multiple Web services - each with
different host names and URLs - that appear to be completely separate sites.
This is widely used by ISPs, hosting sites and content providers who need to
manage multiple sites but do not want to buy a new machine for each one.
Picking an IP address
There are two types of virtual hosts: IP-based and non-IP-based. The former is
where each virtual host has its own IP address. You must have a new IP address
for each virtual host you want to set up, either from your existing allocation
or by obtaining more from your service provider. When you have extra IP
addresses, you tell your machine to handle them. On some operating systems, you
can give a single ethernet interface multiple addresses (typically with an
fconfig alias command). On other systems, you must have a different
physical interface for each IP address (typically by buying extra ethernet
cards).
IP addresses are a resource that costs money and are increasingly difficult to
get, so modern browsers can now also use 'non-IP' virtual hosts. This
lets you use the same IP address for multiple host names. When the server
receives an incoming Web connection, it does not know the hostname that was used
in the URL. However, the new HTTP/1.1 specification adds a facility where the
browser must tell the server the hostname it is using, on the Host: header. If
an older browser connects to a non-IP virtual host, it does not send the Host:
header, so the server must respond with a list of possible virtual
hosts. Apache provides some help for configuring a site for both old and new
browsers.
Picking a Hostname and Updating the DNS
Having selected an IP address, the next stage is to update the DNS so that
browsers can convert the hostname into the right address. The DNS is the system
that every machine connected to the internet uses to find the IP address of host
names. If your hostname is not in the DNS, no one can connect to
your server (except by the unfriendly IP address).
If the virtual hostname you are going to use is under your existing domain,
you can just add the record into your own DNS server. If the virtual hostname
is in someone else's domain, you must get them to add it to their DNS
server files. In some cases, you want to use a domain not yet used on the
internet, in which case you must apply for the domain name from the
InterNIC and set up the primary and secondary DNS servers for it, before adding
the entry for your virtual host.
In any of these cases, the entry you need to add to the DNS is an address record
(an A record) pointing to the appropriate IP address. For example, say you want
the domain www.my-dom.com to access your host with IP address 10.1.2.3: you
must add the following line to the DNS zone file for my-dom.com:
www A 10.1.2.3
Now, users can enter http://www.my-dom.com/ as a URL in their browsers and get
to your Web server. However, it will return the same information as if the
machine's original hostname had been used. So, the final stage is to tell Apache
how to respond differently to the different addresses.
How Apache Handles Virtual Hosts
Configuring Apache for virtual hosts is a two-stage process. First, it needs
to be told which IP addresses (and ports) to listen to for incoming Web
connections. By default, Apache listens to port 80 on all IP addresses of the
local machine, and this is often sufficient. If you have a more complex
requirement, such as listening on various port numbers, or only to specific IP
addresses, then the BindAddress or Listen directives can be used.
Second, having accepted an incoming Web connection, the server must be
configured to handle the request differently, depending on what virtual host it
was addressed to. This usually involves configuring Apache to use a different
DocumentRoot.
Telling Apache Which Addresses to Listen To
If you are happy for Apache to listen to all local IP addresses on the port
specified by the Port directive, you can skip this section. However, there are
some cases where you want to use the directives explained here:
- If you have many IP addresses on the machine but only want to run a Web
server on some of them
- If one or more of your virtual hosts is on a different port
- If you want to run multiple copies of the Apache server serving different virtual
hosts
There are two ways of telling Apache what addresses and ports to listen to:
- Use the BindAddress directive to specify a single address or port
- Use the Listen directive to any number of specific addresses or ports
For example, if you run your main server on IP address 10.1.2.3 port 80, and a
virtual host on IP 10.1.2.4 port 8000, you would use:
Listen 10.1.2.3:80
Listen 10.1.2.4:8000
Listen and BindAddress are documented on the Apache site.
Configuring the Virtual Hosts
Having gotten Apache to listen to the appropriate IP addresses and ports, the
final stage is to configure the server to behave differently for requests on
each of the different addresses. This is done using <VirtualHost> sections in
the configuration files, normally in httpd.conf.
A typical (but minimal) virtual host configuration looks like this:
<VirtualHost 10.1.2.3>
DocumentRoot /www/vhost1
ServerName www.my-dom.com
</VirtualHost>
This should be placed in the httpd.conf file. You replace the text
10.1.2.3 with one of your virtual host IP addresses. If you want to specify a
port as well, follow the IP address with a colon and the port number
(example: 10.1.2.4:8000). If omitted, the port defaults to 80.
If no <VirtualHost> sections are given in the configuration files, Apache
treats requests from the different addresses and ports identically. In terms of
setting up virtual hosts, we call the default behavior the main server
configuration. Unless overridden by <VirtualHost> sections, the main server
behaviour is inherited by all the virtual hosts. When configuring virtual
hosts, you must decide what changes to make in each of the virtual
host configurations.
Any directives inside a <VirtualHost> section apply to just that virtual host.
The directives either override the configuration give in the main server, or
supplement it, depending on the directive. For example, the DocumentRoot
directive in a <VirtualHost> section overrides the main server's DocumentRoot,
while AddType supplements the main server's mime types.
Now, when a request arrives, Apache uses the IP address and port it arrived on
to find a matching virtual host configuration. If no virtual host matches the
address and port, it is handled by the main server configuration. If it does
match a virtual host address, Apache uses the configuration of that virtual
server to handle the request.
For the example above, the server configuration used is the same as the
main server, except that the DocumentRoot is /www/vhost1, and the
ServerName is www.my-dom.com. Directives commonly set in <VirtualHost>
sections are DocumentRoot, ServerName, ErrorLog and TransferLog. Directives
that deal with handling requests and resources are valid inside <VirtualHost>
sections. However, some directives are not valid inside <VirtualHost> sections,
including BindAddress, StartSevers, Listen, Group and User.
You can have as many <VirtualHost> sections as you want. You can
leave one or more of your virtual hosts being handled by the main server, or
have a <VirtualHost> for every available address and port, and leave the main
server with no requests to handle.
VirtualHost sections for non-IP Virtual Hosts
Non-IP virtual hosts are configured in a very similar way. The IP address that
the requests arrive on is given in the <VirtualHost> directive, and the
host name is put in the ServerName directive. The difference is that there
(usually) is more than one <VirtualHost> section handling the same IP address.
For Apache to know whether a request arriving on a particular IP
address is supposed to be a name-based requests, the NameVirtualHost directive
addresses for name-based requests. A virtual host can handle more than one
non-IP hostname by using the ServerAlias directive, in addition to the
ServerName.
null

Nested virtualization not available in Solaris 11.2

Hello!
Anybody know why virtual hardware virtualization is not available for my Solaris 11.2 guest?
I want to be able to use Solaris kernel zones.
Host environment:
   SuperMicro A1SRM-2758F, 32GB RAM
   ESXi-5.5 (build 2302651)
I know the CPU (Atom C2758) supports both VT-x and EPT that is required for 64bit virtualization nesting
And browsing to:
   https://myip/mob/?moid=ha-host&doPath=capability
Shows me that the (unsupported) feature is available:
   nestedHVSupported
boolean
true
I have created a VM with vHardware vmx-10, selected 'Expose hardware assisted virtualization to the guest OS' and installed Solaris-11.2 as a guest.
I have also checked that 'vhv.enable = "TRUE" ' is to be found in the vmx file.
But from the Solaris guest Kernel zone are not available:
# virtinfo
NAME            CLASS
vmware          current
non-global-zone supported
# uname -a
SunOS global1 5.11 11.2 i86pc i386 i86pc
Anybody have any ideas why this is not available. Worked fine in VMware Fusion.
Best regards,
- Morten Green Hermansen, Fanitas

Hello jmattson!
I tried to add:
vvt.etmt.uc = "TRUE"
to the vmx file and according to the log it got picked up:
2015-03-31T20:03:40.790Z| vmx| I120: DICT
featMask.vm.hv.capable = Min:1
2015-03-31T20:03:40.790Z| vmx| I120: DICT
vhv.enable = TRUE
2015-03-31T20:03:40.790Z| vmx| I120: DICT
vvt.etmt.uc = TRUE
2015-03-31T20:03:40.790Z| vmx| I120: DICT sched.scsi0:4.throughputCap = off
2015-03-31T20:03:40.790Z| vmx| I120: DICT sched.scsi1:3.throughputCap = off
But Solaris will still not support kernel zones:
# virtinfo
NAME            CLASS
vmware          current
non-global-zone supported
Will I then need to upgrade to ESXi-6 - and downgrade to the Web Client :'( for this to work?
Best regards and thank you SO much for your help!
- Morten Green Hermansen, Fanitas

Security problem with virtual host

Hello,
I am using flex builder3 and php5 to run an application built
in codeIgniter 1.6.3 and flex. Problem is that I am using a virtual
host to run codeigniter in browser. My doc root is
htdocs\projects\FlexPHP . Here my flex files resides. In browser I
can access it by giving following url :
http://localhost/projects/FlexPHP/bin-debug/FlexPHP.html
and I am accessing my php application in
http://flexphp/ (path :
htdocs\projects\FlexPHP\src\server-script)
I am calling http service from flex ...
<mx:HTTPService id="phpService"
url="
http://flexphp/profile/ProfileMngr"
resultFormat="e4x" result="showResult()" useProxy="false"
showBusyCursor="true" />
<mx:Button label="Call PHP"
click="phpService.send()"/>
and getting following error
[RPC Fault faultString="Security error accessing url"
faultCode="Channel.Security.Error" faultDetail="Destination:
DefaultHTTP"]
at mx.rpc::AbstractInvoker/
http://www.adobe.com/2006/flex/mx/internal::faultHandler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\project s\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AbstractInvoker.as:216
at
mx.rpc::Responder/fault()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\Responder.as:49 ]
at
mx.rpc::AsyncRequest/fault()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\src\mx\rpc\AsyncRequest .as:103]
at
DirectHTTPMessageResponder/securityErrorHandler()[E:\dev\3.0.x\frameworks\projects\rpc\sr c\mx\messaging\channels\DirectHTTPChannel.as:368]
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEventFunction()
at flash.events::EventDispatcher/dispatchEvent()
at flash.net::URLLoader/redirectEvent()
I have placed cross-domain policy file in server-script
folder as the urls are different but it didnt solve my problem.
I have tried it with another virtual host which is not a
codeigniter application , a simple php page returing a xml..working
properly.
Any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance.

no problem from flex side.. need to escape crossdomain.xml
file in htacess for codeigniter i.e RewriteCond $1
!^(index\.php|images|application|uploads|robots\.txt|crossdomain\.xml)
in htaccess file.

Problem with Virtual Host

i create a virtual host on infrastructure and midtier
if i connect to the home page (http://www.virtualhost.it:7779) it works. if i connect to the http://www.virtualhost.it:7779/pls/portal i get the original page http://server.rsdom.com:7779/pls/portal.
how can i understand the problem?
thanks in advance
giorgio

Sounds like you edited the HTTP Server for the virtual host, but did not update the portal configuration within the repository. If you have access to metalink, see:
Note:218031.1
Subject: Configuring Multiple URLs With Portal 9.0.2 Using Virtual Hosts

Problem with DNS and/or Virtual Host (works from inside, not from outside)

I am running several web sites (as virtual hosts) successfully on one Xserve (192.168.200), which are accessible internally and from the Internet (via forwarding port 80 on our firewall).
Now I am trying to add another web site (newmini.domain.com), which however is running on a Mac mini (also on the same subnet as the Xserve) at 192.168.100. What I did is make an additional entry under the Xserve's DNS for the domain (domain.com) (+ Machine..., pointing to 192.168.0.100). (I also made the necessary changes to the Mac mini's httpd and hosts configuration--no problem there).
Now, here's the strange thing: All computers on the subnet, whose DNS points to the Xserve, can see and browse newmini.domain.com fine. No problem. The computers ask the Xserve for the IP of the host in question, the Xserve says, "192.168.100", the request goes to the Mac mini, and it serves the web site as expected.
But this doesn't happen if the request comes from the Internet. Instead of seeing the Mac mini, the client sees the default web site of the Xserve... So it appears that somewhere, the virtual host part of the HTTP request is lost between our firewall and the Xserve.
Any ideas? Thanks.

It's not going to.
You say you've setup port forwarding on the firewall. Port forwarding only cares about the port number (80). It knows nothing about the nature of the request (e.g. the hostname that the web request is for). Therefore all extenal connections on port 80 get sent to the XServe. The newmini doesn't see the traffic at all.
If you only have a single public IP address you can only forward port 80 traffic to a single machine. Your options are to either use a different port number, or configure the XServe to proxy the connection to the mini (so now the traffic goes router -> XServe -> Mini -> XServe -> router), although that might not do what you want since it still places load and dependencies on the XServe.

Console shows web application deployed to server but not to the virtual host yet things still work, huh?

I finally figured out how to get the virtual hosting piece to work in
wls811. Now I have a question about the console presenting me with some web
app information. The Web Application Modules node and the Deploy tab shows
me the application is deployed to the server and it's Active, however the
console indicates the web app is not deployed to the virtual host and is
inactive. But the server is resonding to requests for each of my Virtual
Host Names, so they must be deployed to the virtual hosts as well.
Anyone with some ideas? Thanks.

do you see any deployment exception in the server.log ? if nothing please post the web.xml and sun-web.xml

OVD plugin returning "Virtual" entry when entry not yet available in OID

Hi,
We've been working on a solution in which a new user has to get immediate access to a website and we, because the provisioning is taking some time, we have implemented a plugin for OVD which basically looks in the OID and if the user exists in OID it will return that entry and otherwise will create an virtual entry (it is not stored in OID) and return this entry to the requestor.
Now this al looks like it is working fine but the requester, OAM in this case, reacts different on a "virtual" entry then a non virtual entry. When it is a "virtual" entry not al headers are filled by OAM. So my question is if there is someone out there who has done something simliar and/or knows why this is happening, because we tried everything and still face this problem. Any help would be appreciated!
Br,
Sarris

Hi Flanjman,
Additional this article may give you more tips.
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/674454/name-resolution-not-yet-available
I’m glad to be of help to you!
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

OAS: The request did not specify a valid virtual host.

Hi,
we install the OAS 3.01 on our system (NT 4.0 sr 4 Worstation).
we start the AdminListener with:
oswctl start ADMIN
the listener starts sucessfully.
trying accessing on the ADMIN-Page with the IE 4.0
(http://[IP-adress]:8888)
the following message occured:
The request did not specify a valid virtual host.
any idea ???
Thank
Martin
null

Dennis Bourgeois (guest) wrote:
: Peter Siket (guest) wrote:
: : Martin Behrmann (guest) wrote:
: : : Hi,
: : : we install the OAS 3.01 on our system (NT 4.0 sr 4
: Worstation).
: : : we start the AdminListener with:
: : : oswctl start ADMIN
: : : the listener starts sucessfully.
: : : trying accessing on the ADMIN-Page with the IE 4.0
: : : (http://[IP-adress]:8888)
: : : the following message occured:
: : : The request did not specify a valid virtual host.
: : : any idea ???
: : : Thank
: : : Martin
: : Hi Martin,
: : we learned that OAS 3.01 only accepts hostnames. The only
way
: to
: : enable communication is to supply a hosts-file with the
: : appropriate entry. I don't know why but so it works.
: : Peter
: Martin,
: I'm running OAS 4.0.8 but here is a thought... In 4.0.8 if you
go
: to the network properties for your listner and add the IP
address
: there then it works. I also found that if you are using
: something like a Cisco domain controller to do load balancing
: you
: will want to list the IP address of the Domain Controler in
there
: as well.
: Dennis
If you access using the hostname, this will be passed onto the
Application Server in addition to the IP address. The
Application Server will use the hostname details to determine
the listener files to use under the $ORACLE_HOME/ows path. This
means you can more than one set of OAS files and therefore in
theory service two different hostname addresses mapped to the
same IP address.
Nigel.
null

Dreamweaver CS5 with PHP, not getting it to work with virtual Host

I have not got far with the book so far. I am still on the second chapter where you set the Virtual Host but after setting up the Dreamweaver site definition and doing the test. I get the error that page cannot be found.
I ask if I can mail the text file of the http.conf and the httpd-vhosts.conf to anyone to see if I screwed up somewhere . I am running on Windows 7 with the WAMP setup.

Mr. Powers,
I used your included file httpd-vhosts.conf. And it did something since now I get a new set of errors.
( ! ) Warning: Unknown: failed to open stream: Permission denied in Unknown on line 0
( ! ) Fatal error: Unknown: Failed opening required 'C:/vhosts/phpcs5/lesson02/site_check.php' (include_path='.;C:\php\pear') in Unknown on line 0
But I checked the properties of the folders and unchecked the 'read only' permission but still gets checked again. I am using Windows 7 64-bit.
I checked on the web nobody says any solutions about it, they only imply that is a permissions issue.
I apologize, I found out the chapter files were encrypted... thanks

My iphone suddenly crashed and asked for restoration, however itunes sends error message of host not available, what should I do?

My iphone suddenly crashed and asked for restoration, however itunes sends error message of host not available (3014), what should I do?

Try -
Error 1004, 1013, 1638, 3014, 3194: These errors may be the result of the connection to gs.apple.com being redirected or blocked. Follow these steps to resolve these errors:
Install the latest version of iTunes.
Check security software. Ensure that communication to gs.apple.com is allowed. Follow this article for assistance with security software. iTunes for Windows: Troubleshooting security software issues.
Check the hosts file. The restore will fail if there is an active entry to redirect gs.apple.com. Follow iTunes: Advanced iTunes Store troubleshooting to edit the hosts file or revert to a default hosts file. See section "Blocked by configuration: (Mac OS X/Windows) > Rebuild network information".
Try to restore from another known-good computer and network.
If the errors persist on another computer, the device may need service.
The "device may need service" means a hardware problem. In that case make an appointment at the Genius Bar of an Apple store.
Apple Retail Store - Genius Bar
Also see:
3014
Restoration of code 3014 will not work?: Apple Support Communities

Virtual Hosts 404 not found

Hi all ,
I have to set up a virtual host on CE7.2
I configure it on "SAP NetweaverAdministrator" --> "Java HTTP Provider Configuration"
virtual hosts name : share_folder
root directory : /share <-- all user and group can access (local directory)
aliases : test_share
after complete configuration.
I access this virtual host by
http://<server>:<port>/share_folder
or
http://<server>:<port>/test_share
all response "404 not found"
Can you give me suggestion.

did you define the alias name dispImageServlet in your web.xml
double click on web deployment descriptors in WSAD , and you will be able to add it very easily

Virtual host _defaultVHost_ is not available

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for