Vista OS and Adobe Standard 9.x

I would like to hear input from Vista users that have
experience with Adobe Acrobat Standard 9.x
Is there any problems with the functionality of Adobe
Standard 9.x on your Vista OS? What are they, and how did you
correct it (them)?

Thank you for your response. These forums are specific to the
Acrobat.com website and its set of hosted services, and do not
cover the Acrobat family of desktop products. Please visit the
following forums for any questions related to the Acrobat family of
desktop products:
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bbeda8b/
Regards,
Ksenija
Acrobat.com moderator

Similar Messages

  • I am using Adobe Reader X on a laptop with Windows Vista OS and Adobe Reader XI on an older laptop with Windows XP OS.  While filling out the same form on each computer, I have found that I can save info on the older laptop, but not on the newer one.  Thi

    I am using Adobe Reader X on a laptop with Windows Vista OS and Adobe Reader XI on an older laptop with Windows XP OS.  While filling out the same form on each computer, I have found that I can save info on the older laptop, but not on the newer one.  This is a big problem.  I must be able to save on the newer computer.  Do I need to buy a new computer with a more up-to-date OS?  Please help.

    Adobe Reader X can only save reader-enabled forms. Adobe Reader XI can save all forms.

  • Vista Premium and Adobe Reader 8.12 Problem

    I downloaded Adobe Reader 8.1.2 and when the download was finished the the computer said "Setup was completed successfully." When I try to open a PDF file using Adobe Reader 8.1.2 , I get a message that says "Windows has encountered a problem caused by Adobe Reader. Currently , there is no solution to the problem reported" to close." Vista suggest that I go and download the lastest version of Adobe Reader which is 8.12. I have uninstalled all Adode Readers from my computer, closed , reopened and reinstalled Adobe Reader. Each time I attempt to open a PDF file, Vista Premium Windows closes the process.
    Any ideas what my problem is and how I can get Adobe Reader to work? Thanks

    I don't have Vista, but in XP I have found deleting the printer driver
    and re-installing sometimes works.
    Mike

  • Word 2007 to pdf in Adobe Standard 8.1 errors

    I have an XP PC with Word 2007 and Adobe Standard 8.1.  I'm having issues converting some
    word docs to pdf but not all.  You click on the acrobat tab in Word and run the converter, but it stops midway thru the process and says "Error"  Other documents work fine.  Could it be a template issue or something in the document itself that Adobe doesn't like, ie a symbol, format, font??  Any assistance would be appreciated.

    Often it is a document issue, combined with some of the screwy ways that OFFICE 2007 is working. You might try saving parts of the document to another file and delete parts until you find where there is a problem. That might likely point to the issue. Also, try to print to the Adobe PDF printer to check for potential issues. One thing that can crop up with the PDF Maker is that you run out of memory in the TEMP folder. To check that, turn off adding tags to the PDF (really bloats things) and try again. If it works, it is likely a memory issue and cleaning out the TEMP folder might take care of the problem.

  • Why does the Adobe Standard profile make a mess of old NEF files?

    Recently I've been reprocessing some old NEF files taken with the Nikon D50 camera years ago, and I was startled to find that the Adobe Standard camera profile does a bad job on them: the photos come out muddy-looking, really unacceptable, with too much yellow and magenta. I can fix the problem by choosing the Camera Standard profile, which gives acceptable results. However, I believe that Adobe Standard is generally recommended by Adobe, and I wonder what the problem is here. Does anyone know?
    I currently use a Nikon D7000, and Adobe Standard seems to work well enough with that camera.
    Later: After checking and comparing more carefully, I think that perhaps I prefer Camera Standard with the D7000 too. Adobe Standard is certainly acceptable with the D7000, but Camera Standard gives blue skies of clearer blue, and less exaggerated reds. So the best fix for me is probably to make Camera Standard my default for all cameras.
    Looking around the Web, I see various people complaining about too much magenta with Adobe Standard, although other people are happy with it.
    Message was edited by: Jonathan Palfrey

    Yammer P, thanks for the input.  I have been working with the DNG Profile Editor since the first version was available.  I also started using the Passport software when it was first available.  I first worked on a profile for the D200 and after many attempts I finally have one that works great.  The Camera profiles did not exist at that time and the D200 does not have Picture Control Profiles, I believe that was first available with the D300.  Adobe did generate Picture Control Profiles for the D200 and they are also available in Nikon Capture NX2. 
    I currently have a D700, and have spent a lot of time working on profiles for this camera.  I have used the DNG Profile Editor's Chart Tab to generate profiles for most of the Camera Profiles and Adobe Standard.  I find that Adobe Standard profile is brighter than the Camera profiles by about 0.25 stop.  After working on this for about 2 years I have decided to use the Camera Neutral with a modified tone curve and slight reduction in saturation as my starting point and no changes in hue.  I also generated a modified Picture Control profile for Neutral using the Nikon Picture Control software that has the same characteristics and loaded it into the camera.  I get good agreement between jpg's from the camera and the nef file that opens in ACR without adjustments.   The tone curve I used only has three points - the In/out values are 27/22, 127/127, 228/233 and saturation was set to -5. 
    I don't understand what Adobe changed when they genrated the Adobe Standard Profile instead of the ACR4.x versions, but I like the ACR4.x version better.  

  • Severe Magenta Cast Some Cameras Adobe Standard

    Adobe Standard
    Generic Daylight Profile for Canon G10 Created by me with a Macbeth Chart and the DNG Profile Editor (not of this scene specifically) and Adobe Standard as the Base Profile.
    Images from a Canon Powershot G10.  Both have exactly the exactly the the same settings.  White Balance Auto and then Auto Tone with Brightness set back to default of 50.
    Download DNG file here
    Download Generic Daylight Profile for G10 used in this example here.
    Happens with my 5D (original) as well.  Does not happen with Leica M9 and can't say for any other cameras at this time.

    Actually, I wouldn't expect that much difference between most camera sensors under the same controlled conditions.  I suspect if you divided up the Adobe Standard profiles into sensors and other factors more meaningful than make and model, the differences might be more obvious.
    So, for example, I see little difference between a Nikon D80 and a Canon (which uses the same APC sensor technology [down to the manufacturer], I think) there is little difference. But when I compare Nikon and Ricoh I see a much more obvious difference. The fact is that the image guts of most DSLRs these days are made from one of at most three manufacturers.  The majority come from two. A few others that I recall had similar sensors and image processing engines also seemed pretty similar.
    The Adobe Standard is not about trying to pull the wool over our eyes.  It is about establishing a baseline for raw image manipulation.  The fact that most sensors and bodies will really respond pretty closely aside, there could be outliers. Making the standard based on the make and model allows for a more natural way to handle presets and what-not from the point of an application.  The fact that, under the covers, most cameras really respond quite similarly in similar median conditions is not all that interesting.
    It is at the extreme edges of image reproduction that the makes, models and even specific bodies will be most drastic (which is why getting to know your camera in extreme shooting conditions is important, and why being able to make your own profiles is so powerful.)
    At any rate, if your particular make and model (or even specific body) is not to your liking, it is pretty easy to make your own standard.  Because I don't have a studio, I've gone ahead and made "standards" like based on things like time of day (for natural light) or "my living room" which sometimes give me an easy out. No one needs to use Adobe Standard. Heck, if you really like the in-camera settings and Adobe profiling doesn't work then it may be that the vendor software is the way to go. Double heck, some professionals still think this whole raw thing is stupid and shoot JPEG. This solves a whole raft of problems -- decisions one doesn't even have to make.  Just get exposure right and go!

  • I have vista OS and a game on facebook says need adobe flash player 12.0.02 or later. I have version 15 and it's not bringing it up. What could be wrong?

    I'm trying to play a game on facebook, but when I go to play it, it comes up with a message saying I need to install adobe flash player 12 or later. I installed version 15 but it still keeps getting that message to install version 12 or later. I checked in my control panel under programs installed and it shows that adobe flash player 15 active x listed. So why won't the game see it? Do I need an older version of adobe flash? Maybe version 12, if so where can I find it. I tried to find 12 but every site keeps taking me to 15.
    I have Windows Vista Home Premium OS. I have Firefox version 32.

    Hello,
    You might not have the plugin for Firefox installed. Adobe has two different versions of Flash - one for Internet Explorer and another for Firefox. Internet Explorer uses ActiveX. You can check if Firefox has the plugin by going to:
    * Tools > Add-ons > Plugins, or
    * [Image: New Fx Menu] > Add-ons > Plugins
    In Firefox, go to this link and Adobe should give you right correct installer:
    * https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
    If for whatever reason it is not choosing the correct OS for you, you can manually select Windows Vista and "Other Browsers" here:
    * https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/

  • Windows Vista Home Version and Adobe Flash Player 10.

    I use Windows Vista Home Version and I am finding it difficult to download Adobe Flash Player 10.
    It appears to have been downloaded but on examining Control Panel, I discovered that its content is empty (no size is aportioned to it).
    Most importantly, I am unable to play videos that require adobe flash player.

    I understand Vista is a 32 bit.
    IE 8 is what I have but I would consider IE 9 if that would be necessary.
    Just a bit more update. I just tried to download Adobe FP 10 again with the following results, again:
    The Adobe Download Manager windows shows:
    FP 10.3 Status as 100% "Installation Pending".
    FP 10.2 Status as 100% " Instatlling Application"
    and that will go one forever but never really actually installs anything and just keeps cycling through the "Add to Download" e.g. "Fanbase", "Times Reader"
    and "Adobe Air" (none of which I want added to the download), and the download and installation shows as 100%.
    Go figure!

  • Windows vista, internet explorer 8 and adobe reader 9

    I have windows vista, internet explorer 8 and adobe reader 9.  When i open pdf files from a website i cannot save the document.  I don't get an error message, it just does not open.

    Have you tried capturing these application in separate packages?  I have been successful in capturing IE8 in one package and Adobe Reader XI in another package and then using the OptionalAppLinks option in the IE8 package to point to the Adobe Reader dat file.  Just make sure that both packages work outside of the applinking.  Also, you can try to install Adobe to the native machine and see if the embedded pdfs work in the virtual IE package. 
    These are just the troubleshooting steps that I would take to narrow down what is causing the issue you are seeing.
    Lance

  • Have Adobe Standard CS 5 (Student), and would like to upgrade to Creative Cloud (Non-Student) - won't accept my serial number for special pricing for existing users

    I currently use Adobe Standard CS 5. It was bought with the Education discount. I would like to upgrade to Creative Cloud and see that they have special pricing for existing customers that use past versions of Creative Suite. I am no longer in Education, so I will have to buy a full version. This is fine, but it won't accept my serial number for the discounted pricing. Is there something else I should be doing?

    Hi there
    Please contact our Sales team who will assist with your order - 800-585-0774
    Thanks
    Bev

  • If I purchase Adobe Standard, how many computers can I install it onto? And is there any way of buy an additional subscription? i.e. if it can only be installed onto two, is it possible to purchase a third installation?

    The company I work for are looking to purchase Adobe Standard, how many computers can this be installed onto? We need it on three computers so if it is only possible to install it onto two is it possible to install it onto a third computer without having to buy the software twice?
    Thanks

    Hi There,
    We would like to inform you that you can just activate 2 machines with one subscription, however, you can just use one at a time.
    If you wish to use the 3 machine, then, you would have to purchase another subscription with a different email address.
    You would need another email address, because the activation is done via email address and more than two activation on 1 email is not possible.
    Please revert if you need any more information on this.
    Thanks,
    Atul Saini

  • Just got a new MacBook Pro Retina and Adobe Creative Suite 6 Design Standard. OS x 10.8.3 and Photos

    Just got a new MacBook Pro Retina and Adobe Creative Suite 6 Design Standard. OS x 10.8.3 and Photoshop 13.0.4 runs extremely slow. Why?

    Moving this conversation to Photoshop discussion forum

  • What is Adobe Standard and the other camera profiles?

    OK, so i'm using my Canon 5d mark II, shooting RAW in the Neutral picture style.  When I load the photo into Lightroom, at the bottom under Camera Calibration the program shows that by default it has loaded the photograph using the Adobe Standard camera profile.  My question is: Is Lightroom taking the end result of the RAW data being shot with the Neutral picture style and loading it into Lightroom where it translates the photograph (RAW + Neutral picture style) using Adobe Standard?  Or is Lightroom taking the photograph (RAW + Neutral picture style) and overriding the Neutral picture style setting in my camera and replacing it with another picture style it calls Adobe Standard?
    Another and potentially easier to understand way of asking the question would be if I shot two photographs in RAW, one with the Neutral picture style set in my camera and one with the Landscape setting, and then loaded them into Lightroom using Adobe Standard camera profile, would the two photographs look any different?
    Sorry, I am new to digital photography and all adobe programs, and would greatly appreciate the help of a veteran.

    The photos would look exactly the same. The picture style that your camera is set on makes no difference to the raw image. That picture style is carried in your raw file as just a tag that tells Canon's raw converter how to interpret the data. Adobe doesn't use that information.
    It's up to you to choose the profile that meets your artistic desires.
    Hal

  • On opening some pdfs in new tab, get a box labeled Adobe Acrobat with a ? in it. Right click on the link gets the pdf. What does the box and ? mean. Running W7, FF 10.0.2, Adobe Standard 9. Thanks

    On opening some pdfs in new tab, get a box labeled Adobe Acrobat with a ? in it. Go back to the original link, right click on the link gets the pdf. What does the box and ? mean and why do I get it when trying to open some pdfs? Running W7, FF 10.0.2, Adobe Standard 9. Thanks.

    Assuming that you are using IE10 / IE11 on Windows: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2716529

  • Baffled! What are adobe acrobat 8.1 standard and adobe reader 8.1.05

    My laptop has installed adobe acrobat 8.1 standard. I need to complete an online form which requires a minimum of adobe reader 8.1.05 so I downloaded adobe reader X, assuming this would work, but get a pop-up notice telling me I need to upgrade and still cannot insert text in the form. Can anyone advise me what I need to download? I really am confused what the adobe acrobat does and what the reader does!

    The developer very poorly phrased the requirement.
    The proper phrasing could be "You need to update your version of Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat to minimum version of 8.1.05."
    Adobe Reader and Adobe Acrobat are 2 distinct products, one only reads the other is a full processing product., but both products interact with the same file format and for the same version number Adobe Acrobat has the same capabilities that Adobe Reader has and then some features that are unique to Acrobat.
    With JavaScirpt a developer can identify the product (Adobe Reader or Adobe Acrobat), the variation (Reader, Standard, Professional, Business Tools) and the major and minor version of the product. And with that information and knowledge of the capabilities of each version, can make a custom message for the end user if a newer version is needed. This script can be executed as the PDF is opened. With some simple coding the developer could have even cusotmized the message for the procuct that tue user had. Had this been done, it would have been very clear as what you had to do. This information and properties have been avilable since the introduction of JavaScript in vesion 3.01.

Maybe you are looking for