Visual Difference on image between acrobat 6 and Above

Dear all,
We have a query on visual difference in the pdf file(particularly in images).
We have also inserted the screenshot image in this mail
Please help and tell me the difference in features on this.
In Acrobat Professional 9.0
In Acrobat Professional 6.0
Regards,
Jayakrishnan

Hi Jayakrishnan,
There can be different reasons of this behavior. Different image formats carry different information along with them. For example, a PNG can carry gamma along with it. Different software follow different ways to handle this. Acrobat 6, being an older version (a very old version actually) works on older algorithm.There weren't many advanced image formats available at that time. Acrobat 9 should be able to handle images with more details.
I can provide you more details if I can look into the data of some sample images that you have.
~Sandeep V.

Similar Messages

Visual difference in image between acrobat 6 and above

Dear all,
We have a query on visual difference in the pdf file(particularly in images).
We have also inserted the screenshot image in this mail
Please help and tell me the difference in features on this.
In Acrobat Professional 9.0
In Acrobat Professional 6.0
Regards,
Jayakrishnan

Hi Jayakrishnan,
There can be different reasons of this behavior. Different image formats carry different information along with them. For example, a PNG can carry gamma along with it. Different software follow different ways to handle this. Acrobat 6, being an older version (a very old version actually) works on older algorithm.There weren't many advanced image formats available at that time. Acrobat 9 should be able to handle images with more details.
I can provide you more details if I can look into the data of some sample images that you have.
~Sandeep V.

Difference in value Between BW and R/3

Hi,
We are in the process of validating reports .We have observed difference in value for credit and debit amount fields in BW and for the same data is coming from standard data source 0EN_JVA_2 (Joint venture: Actual line item using delta extraction) we have done full data load. In the data source the data coming from a single field and that is spited based on debit/credit indicator in R/3.
I need your valuable input on where the problem is for the difference of value between BW and R/3.
Regards
Deva

Hi,
Is there any filterations in the IP?
Any data packet deletion activity in the start rountine?
Any update rule for the key figure is having routine with modifiying the value?
Kindly check.
In case if you are seeing number of records, always aggregation happens.
If the difference is in terms of quantity of the key figure values, kindly check the above three.
Kindly come to us so that we can suggest
Hope this helps
Janardhan Kumar

Image size changes when moving an image between Lightroom and CC.

Image size changes when moving an image between Lightroom and CC.
I opened a .dng image in LR and then opened it in the Develop module. I clicked on Crop Overlay and then on the ‘As Shot’ drop down menu (the lock is closed) and cropped to 11 x 17 and clicked ‘Done’-.
I click Cntl-E and the image opens in CC. There I click on Image > Image Size and the Image Size is 13.288 inches by 20.533 inches.
Why does the image size change?
I believe there is a menu to control the size of the image and I've looked everywhere I can think of in LR and CC, I googled various descriptions and I checked two of Scott Kelby's books, but I just can't figure out how to keep the image a consistent size when moving between LR and CC.
Help!...Please?

The penny will drop soon or maybe the cloud will lift.
In Lightroom all editing is undoable/nondestructive.
Hence a crop of 3x2 is not inches, centimetres, pixels or anything else. It is jst a ratio. When a file is exported, either to PS or disk, then the crop ratio has size determined in respect of pixels and inches or cms.
So my 6000x5000 pixel image I will crop to 3x2 that leaves (before exporting) a 6000x4000 file.
Now when exported it can be set to export at
100pixels per inch and will end up at 60x40" when printed.
200pixels per inch will end up at 30x20"
300ppi will end at 20x13.3"
You will notice in the Crop Tool there are no size denominations such as inches or centimetres as an image file only has pixels and the determination of size is done through exporting or printing.
Hope that helps somewhat..

Amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting

Hi,
After we run 1KEK for ARAP transfer to profit center there is amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting for customere reconciliation account. We checked F.5D and rerun 1KEK this issue still exit.
Any idea for it? Thanks.

hi Kyle,
thanks for the effort, but it wasn't the thing i asked for ...
what i would like to find out is:
if CO area settings are set w/o profit centers, why the system still demands profit center assignment with cost center master data (ie.)
well, i can always turn off the message, but this isn't the solution i want to use ...
i will rather open one PC (along with dummy, of course) even though those are not used for the customer ... although, this will not solve statistical posting to cc with cost element category 11 ...
d.

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v?

Is there any difference in quality between mp4 and m4v? I am figuring out how best to save old VCR files. Is the 264 category the best?

So, what would that software be? Anything that I mentioned, e.g., iMovie? Any Video Converter?
I'm a Mac user so I want files that play "natively" in QT X, QT 7, QL, iPod Touch, iPhone, iPad, and/or TV players. This means I want the H.264/AAC compressed data in MOV, MP4, or M4V file containers. I can use QT 7 Pro, MPEG Streamclip, and /or QT X to move MPEG-4/AAC compressed data to MOV file containers, MPEG Streamclip to movie M4V and MOV MPEG-4/AAC data to MP4 file containers, and Subler to move MP4 or MOV MPEG-4 AVC/AAC/AC3/Chapter data to M4V file containers. This is strictly a simple "copy" operation and no recompression of data is involved. (I.e., the quality is not changed.)
iMovie is a video editor and it forces an export conversion of your project once completed which can degrade quality. Have never used the Any Video Converter so I don't know if it has an audio and/or video "passthrough" feature for data already in a compatible compression formats. If it doesn't then any conversion it makes has the potential to degrade video content.
As to AVI, this is a legacy file container abandoned by Microsoft a dozen years ago in favor of their modernized WMV compression format/file type products. Compared to MKV, AVI is an outmoded/out-of-date container which I don't recommend you use unless you are a glutton for punishment. However, if you must use it, then you might try the AvidMux app. It can "copy" compatible content to a number of file container types—including AVI and MKV. Just don't blame me if its use creates more problems than it solves on current Mac systems.

What's the difference between Acrobat and Livecycle?

I'm creating forms for a very large company.
What's the difference between Livecycle and Acrobat?
I have been creating them in Livecyle - they need to be filled out and emailed (not just the data, the completed form).
Can I create it in Livecycle and save it as Acrobat?
Can it be edited in Acrobat after it's created?

acrobat.exe is part of Adobe Acrobat and acrord32.exe is part of Adobe Reader.

How can I better improve the color of images between Photoshop and Premiere?

I have trouble getting true colors between Photoshop and Premiere CS6.
What can I do to solve this situation?

Premiere Pro works internally with colors in an RGB (red, green, blue) color space. If you want to edit video clips you create in Photoshop in Premiere Pro, create the clips in RGB.
If you want to broadcast the final movie it is best to ensure, in Photoshop, that the colors in your image are broadcast-safe. Assign the appropriate destination color space—for example, SDTV (Rec. 601)—to the document in Photoshop.
You can refer to some suggestion as below:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/premierepro/cs/using/WS6693F22C-C06E-431a-A634-62343C65BA7B.ht ml#WS4AF3A4A1-D276-4f3b-A5B2-D3C19D3269DA
Let me know if you have any more questions on this.
Cheers!
Mandhir

Differences xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?

HI,
there are differences in xml-db between R10g2 and R11_2 ?
where I can find about it
regards
Edited by: astramare on Feb 17, 2011 3:04 PM

ok:
we have changed our DB from R10.2 to R11_2
by using DataPump
we do create a lot of different schema-based xml-Data
by using DBMS_XMLGEN
from a sql/xml-function based View
like
xmldoc := DBMS_XMLGEN.getXML(ctx);
xmldoc_xmlType:=(xmltype(xmldoc)) ;
xmldoc_xmlType.isSchemaValid
dbms_xslprocessor.clob2file
all other xml_schema do work fine after migration
with this one following exception
while validate the output inside a package
we get an error
LSX-00285: Referenzierter Schlüssel "405986.0" ist nicht definiert
to look at differences
I have identical created
one XML-output in the ( old ) 10gR2 -DB
and
one XML-output in the ( new ) 11R2 - DB
both I can ok validate against the same schema inside XML-Spy ( Vers 2006 )
but
the R10_2 XMLType does ok validate in DB 10gR2
the R11_2 XMLType does not validate in R11 !
by view the xml-data-files in XMLSpy or another editor
there obvious a difference:
In the SQL/XML-select I work with .extract
the xml-output from R10 is correct in a xml-like structure
the xml-output from R11 is not
both data-file have the identical ascii-words
but different size in kByte
the call to register the schema in R10_2 and R11_2 is identical:
dbms_xmlschema.registerSchema(
schemaurl => vschemaurl,
schemadoc => xsd_file,
local => FALSE,
gentypes => TRUE,
genbean => FALSE,
gentables => TRUE,
force => FALSE,
owner => dbuser
,CSID => nls_charset_id('AL32UTF8')
the xml-schemas looks :
R10
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
xdb:flags="311"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
R11:
<xs:schema targetNamespace="http://www.abcde.de/nsdir"
elementFormDefault="qualified"
attributeFormDefault="unqualified"
-- new ?!
xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true"
-- flag ?!
xdb:flags="8503"
xdb:schemaURL="http://www.abcde.de/nsdis/SCHEMABEZ.XSD"
xdb:schemaOwner="USER"
xdb:numProps="36">
may be its a problem inside the data in the Views ?
or a difference between R10 and r11 ?
regards

Difference in speed between i5 and Core 2 Duo (same GHz)?

My two-year old MacBook Pro has a 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo processor and 4GB RAM.
The cheapest MacBook Pro introduced today has a 2.4GHz i5 processor with 4GB RAM.
Anyone have any idea what the speed difference might be between these two? Approximately?
And does software have to be re-written to take advantage of the i5? In other words: What do I stand to gain if upgrading today?

Read this page and it should answer your questions.
http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/performance.html
Check out the new remodeled MacOSG website! 24-hour Apple-related news & support.
 MacOSG: An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast  Follow us on Twitter: MacOSG

Lightroom 5 differences in image with library and develop

HI, i am new to this forum and light room so maybe this is somewhere. however i am having some issues with my images been different in the develop mode and the library tab. this is also affecting what is exported, with it been the library version not the developed version. mainly it is that the noise reduction and sharpening is not been shown in the other views. i have tried a bunch of things but nothing seems to work. the shots i have noticed it on were shot at ISO 800-1600 and varying shutter speeds of 3seconds and above.
if anyone has any expereince or and answer/solution to this that would be awesome. this is something that is very frustrating to have happened with this product
thanks

Keith_Reeder napsal(a):
Dave Merchant wrote:
I've never heard of someone editing photos on an audio mixing desk.
And - you have to ask - what benefits would come from being able to do so (or otherwise controlling via Midi)?
Fast editing, controlling more sliders at once, using the mouse or tablet just for brush work or cropping, the rest with sliders or knobs(the better choice), you could look the most time just on the image and the changes, and have no need to look on the sliders.
And just that physically feeling..
Oh and actually like I wrote, solutions are existing, but mostly for Mac(Knobroom,PFixer), and it makes sense..the mapping under Paddy is pretty nice, an example image of a list is here. And you can set the functions for more "pages" on the controller, that means you can set really tons of settings. But Paddy "works" for LR 5.2 in a beta version.. You can find Youtube videos, mostly for the Mac plug-ins

Does anyone know what triggers the switch between text and iMessage in the middle of a conversation? Are there any differences in billing between text and iMessage?

In the middle of a text conversation between another iOS 5.0 iPhone user and myself, the conversation elements switched back and forth several times between Text and iMessage. The phone actually tracked it and put little lines indicating the switch, and my comments changed from green to blue and back again. I can't think of anything I changed in the middle of the conversation. I was outside WiFi range, using the Cell network at the time. Now I tried it again, while i'm on WiFI and the messages are Text (green) again.

1. Windows 8.1 Enterprise w Update is the best. It allows you for sideloading in corporate environment without additional tools and licenses.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/jj874388.aspx
2. N series is for EU (without IE).
3. Profesional is fine, but you will need some tools to achieve the same functionality that you have in "pack" Enterprise.
4. VL is volume license, a type of license for multiple computers (to say it simply)
5. MSDN forum is better alternative for problems like this.
6. Attached to MSDN are licenses or at least references to web resources. Read license agreements carefully and let your installation and use follow the license.
Rgds
Milos

Convert Image between Java2 and Microsoft Visual J++6.0

Hello experts,
Where describe that transforma image
in Java2 to image in Microsoft Visual J++ 6.0.
Please help me,thank you.
bch Oct 20,2004

It's hard to help you when you're being so cryptic. Isn't a jpeg file a jpeg file all the world 'round?

Differences in colours between Photoshop and Bridge

I have a question that have puzzled me for a while. There's some differences between the colours in bridge and in photoshop. When they're previewed in Bridge it has nice warm and sligtly desaturated feel to it. When i open the RAW file in Photoshop it gets much pale and red. Why is that? The same thing happens when i shoot the picture and the first preview shows the warm and desaturated version, but when i see the picture again it's back to the pale and red version. Same thing happens, when i open it in Ligthroom. When i click on a picture, it shows the warm and desaturated version, but quickly return to the other one, after the picture is loaded.
I really like the warm and slightly desaturated version, so is there a way i can keep it, or bring it back? I know it has something to do with the colour conversion, that happens in the camera, but i can't figure out how to use it.
I'm shooting with a Canon EOS 5d mkIII. See a screenshot of the issue.
Please help me...
Lars

There is a non-obvious menu at the top right hand side of Bridge that selects whether Bridge displays the camera generated jpeg within the raw file (your preferred rendering above) or the ACR version (the warmer redder image). I set mine to High Quality so the Bridge version always matches the ACR, even if it takes slightly longer to render.
Canon has its own algorithm for conversion and AFAIK they don't share it with Adobe. My advice is change the Bridge setting so that the two match, and try the other camera profiles under ACR Camera Calibration to see if one is more pleasing than the stock Adobe Standard. Alternatively, you can get into modifying/creating your own camera profiles, but that will take some more study and tools, such as using the DNG Profile Editor.
Richard Southworth

Difference in colour between 2012 and 2010 proc

I know that newer 2012 process tries to save detail in the highlights (different tonal curve I guess), and has much better controls in Basic develop module so I was eager to edit my newest shots in LR4.
However, I wasn't so thrilled how it rendered bright pinkish colours.
Two examples below are cropped parts of a photograph, have default values, using Adobe Standard profile, from Canon7D raw file.
Image done in 2012 process, default values.
And this one is 2010:
It doesn't seem a big deal when viewed in the web browser on the white background, but the difference is very obvious when editing those in LR. Notice that 2012 file has a "better" histogram with "safe" highlight zone.
However, it altered the colours as well and histogram shows that too. Pink blouse seem more washed out. I can assure you that process 2010 file is much more closer to the original scene, original colours.
So... can I do anything about this? Can it be corrected in final LR4 version? Sure I can raise the saturation in the pink channel, but that will raise other, well saturated, areas as well and I won't get the same result like in 2010 proc. file.

I've been testing the "2012 Process" using a Macbeth color checker image (raw). My first goal was to determine what settings in LR/2012 would best match CS5/ACR6/2010. I was not trying to preserve the 2010 process, just want to better understand the difference.
First pass just using the defaults in both versions resulted in differences of 3 to 5 points in the RGB values of the 24 patches of the colorchecker. On some patches, one of the RGB values might be the same, but at least one was different by 3 to 5 points. The 2012 version looked lighter overall, so I suspected that the difference was due to tones (as Jeff Schewe has suggested).
So by trial and error I kept reprocessing the LR4/2012 version, decreasing only the Blacks slider. When I got to a setting of Blacks -8, the black colorchecker patch finally matched all 3 RGB values. All the other patches were very close, with a few differences of only 1 point in RGB values, and usually in only 1 value (red or green or blue, but not all three)
However, there was 1 exception. The Blue value in the colorchecker's Yellow patch had a 7 point difference. All the other primary patches were exact matches.
My colorchecker test images were from a Canon 5D2, processed under the Adobe Standard profile, rendered as 16bit TIFs in Adobe98 colorspace, and stacked as Photoshop layers to read the RGB values.
So I suspect what many are perceiving as color differences are real differences, but are caused by the basic difference in tonal rendition between the 2012 and 2010 processes. For the OP, please reprocess your pinks in LR4 with some different black settings and see if you get closer to your original 2010 version. I'd be curious to hear the results.

Visual Difference on image between acrobat 6 and Above

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for