Vlan base Qos on Cisco Nexus 5K

Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)
where i couldn't see any police command under the policy map

Hi,
Please find the below link for configuration guide for Nexus 5K.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli/sm_snmp.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/system_management/513_n1_1/b_Cisco_n5k_system_mgmt_cg_rel_513_n1_1_chapter_01110.pdf
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/configuration/guide/cli_rel_4_0_1a/sm_snmp.pdf
Regards,
Gaurav

Similar Messages

Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)

Is Cisco Nexus 5596UP support vlan base Policing and traffic shaping on code NX OS version: 5.1(3)N1(1)
where i couldn't see any police command under the policy map

I have tested this issue on another 5548UP with L3 running the same NX-OS version and get the same problem. Show CDP from the switch is not discovering devices, but the neightbors can see the 5K in question. Reboot sometimes will fix it, but not always. I suspect a problem with the software since that doesn't happen in NX-OS 5.2. The one I am using is
Software
BIOS:      version 3.6.0
loader:    version N/A
kickstart: version 5.1(3)N2(1)
system:    version 5.1(3)N2(1)

Ask the Expert: Configuration, Design, and Troubleshooting of Cisco Nexus 1000

With Louis Watta
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions about design, configuration, and troubleshooting of Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches operating inside VMware ESXi and Hyper-V with Cisco expert Louis Watta. Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches deliver highly secure, multitenant services by adding virtualization intelligence to the data center network. With Cisco Nexus 1000V Series Switches, you can have a consistent networking feature set and provisioning process all the way from the virtual machine access layer to the core of the data center network infrastructure.
This is a continuation of the live Webcast.
Louis Watta is a technical leader in the services organization for Cisco. Watta's primary background is in data center technologies: servers (UNIX, Windows, Linux), switches (MDS, Brocade), storage arrays (EMC, NetApp, HP), network switches (Cisco Catalyst and Cisco Nexus), and enterprise service hypervisors (VMware ESX, Hyper-V, KVM, XEN). As a Technical Leader in Technical Services, Louis currently supports beta and early field trials (EFTs) on new Cisco software and hardware. He has more than 15 years of experience in a wide variety of data center applications and is interested in data center technologies oriented toward data center virtualization and orchestration. Prior to Cisco, Louis was a system administrator for GTE Government Systems. He has a bachelor of science degree in computer science from North Carolina State University. .
Remember to use the rating system to let Louis know if you have received an adequate response.
Louis might not be able to answer each question because of the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center community Unified Computing shortly after the event.
This event lasts through Friday, JUne 14, 2013. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other Cisco Support Community members.
Webcast related links:
Slides
FAQ
Webcast Video Recording

Right now there is only a few features that are not supported on N1Kv on Hyper-V
They are VXLAN and QOS Fair Weighted Queuing. We are currently demoing VXLAN functionality at Microsoft TechEd Conference this week in New Orleans. So VXLAN support should be coming soon. I can't give you a specific timeline.
For Fair Weighted Queuing I'm not sure. In the VMware world we take advantage of NETIOC infrastructure. In the MS world they do not have a NETIOC infrastructure that we can use to create a similar feature.
Code base parity (as in VMware and Hyper-V VSMs running NXOS 5.x) will happen with the next major N1KV release for ESX.
Let me know if that doesn't answer your question.
thanks
louis

Macvtap over Cisco Nexus ...

Hi everybody!
First all my apologizes for my english language!
I have a standard server running linux (centos 6.5) with kvm to install and configure virtual machines. I tried to use macvtap driver to setup the virutal network interfaces. I not use ucs Cisco servers or Nexus 1000v switches!
The physical ethernet is connected to Cisco Nexus 2000 (with a Cisco Nexus 5548up). To default a standard switch not working with the macvtap configuration because the swith to be support "reflective relay" or "hair pinning" propierties for to this works.
Is possible configure the Cisco Nexus 5548up/2000 to this works? Capabilities how to Adapter-FEX, veheternet, VM-FEX o similars can help me?
Know you some docs over this?
Thank you all.

Hi Tony,
You do not have to worry about PFC. Priority-Flow-Control is something which is related to FCOE or DCBX protocol. With iSCSI as this is a TCP traffic, you have to make sure that you have a proper QOS for the IP Subnet or VLAN that has your iSCSI hosts transmitting the data. As iSCSI rides over TCP this is the major issue that I have seen related to the valid QOS config for the traffic. There is not best practice for it but you have make sure that you added it to a class other than BE or Scavanger class.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
-amit singh

Ask the Expert: Cisco Nexus 2000, 5000, and 6000 Series Switches

with Cisco Expert Vinayak Sudame
Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to learn and ask questions how to configure and troubleshoot the Cisco Nexus 2000, 5000 and 6000 Series Switches with Cisco subject matter expert Vinayak Sudame. You can ask any question on configuration, troubleshooting, features, design and Fiber Channel over Ethernet (FCoE).
Vinayak Sudame is a Technical Lead in Data Center Switching Support Team within Cisco's Technical Services in RTP, North Carolina. His current responsibilities include but are not limited to Troubleshooting Technical support problems and Escalations in the areas of Nexus 5000, Nexus 2000, FCoE. Vinayak is also involved in developing technical content for Cisco Internal as well as external. eg, Nexus 5000 Troubleshooting Guide (CCO), Nexus 5000 portal (partners), etc. This involves cross team collaboration and working with multiple different teams within Cisco. Vinayak has also contributed to training account teams and partners in CAE (Customer Assurance Engineering) bootcamp dealing with Nexus 5000 technologies. In the past, Vinayak's responsibilities included supporting MDS platform (Fiber Channel Technologies) and work with EMC support on Escalated MDS cases. Vinayak was the Subject Matter Expert for Santap Technologies before moving to Nexus 5000 support. Vinayak holds a Masters in Electrical Engineering with Specialization in Networking from Wichita State University, Kansas. He also holds Cisco Certification CCIE (#20672) in Routing and Switching.
Remember to use the rating system to let Vinayak know if you have received an adequate response.
Vinayak might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Data Center sub-community, Other Data Center Topics discussion forum shortly after the event.
This event last through Friday July 12, 2013. Visit the community often to view responses to youe questions of other community members.

Hi Vinayak,
Output of "show cfs internal ethernet-peer database"
Switch 1
ETH Fabric
Switch WWN logical-if_index
20:00:54:7f:ee:b7:c2:80 [Local]
20:00:54:7f:ee:b6:3f:80 16000005
Total number of entries = 2
Switch 2
ETH Fabric
Switch WWN logical-if_index
20:00:54:7f:ee:b6:3f:80 [Local]
20:00:54:7f:ee:b7:c2:80 16000005
Total number of entries = 2
Output of "show system internal csm info trace"
Switch 1 in which "show cfs peers" show proper output
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145339 (CSM_T) csm_sp_buf_cmd_tbl_expand_range(8604): No range command in buf_cmd_tbl.
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145280 (CSM_T) csm_set_sync_status(6257): Peer RT status PSSed
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145188 (CSM_T) csm_sp_handle_local_verify_commit(4291):
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145131 csm_continue_verify_ac[597]: peer is not reachable over CFS so continuing with local verify/commit
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145071 csm_tl_lock(766): Peer information not found for IP address: '172.16.1.54'
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.145011 csm_tl_lock(737):
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.144955 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_build_tl_lock_req_n_send(941): sending lock-request for CONF_SYNC_TL_SESSION_TYPE_VERIFY subtype 0 to Peer ip = (172.16.1.54)
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.143819 (CSM_T) csm_copy_image_and_internal_versions(788): sw_img_ver: 5.2(1)N1(2a), int_rev: 1
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.143761 (CSM_T) csm_sp_get_peer_sync_rev(329): found the peer with address=172.16.1.54 and sync_rev=78
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.143699 (CSM_T) csm_sp_get_peer_sync_rev(315):
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.143641 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_build_tl_lock_req_n_send(838): Entered fn
Mon Jul 1 05:46:19.143582 (CSM_T) csm_set_sync_status(6257): Peer RT status PSSed
Switch 2 in which "show cfs peers" does not show proper output
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.885354 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 77 seq 482
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884992 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd channel-group 51 mode active, cmd pseq 357 seq 369
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884932 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 11, cmd pseq 357 seq 368
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884872 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 357 seq 367
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884811 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd description process_vpc, cmd pseq 357 seq 366
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884750 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd channel-group 51 mode active, cmd pseq 352 seq 365
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884690 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport trunk allowed vlan 2, 11, cmd pseq 352 seq 364
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884630 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd switchport mode trunk, cmd pseq 352 seq 363
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884568 (CSM_ERR) csm_pss_cmd_tree_walk_cb(2057): Parent command not found for cmd description process_vpc, cmd pseq 352 seq 362
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.884207 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3011): Preparing config into /tmp/csm_sp_acfg_1733916569.txt
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.878695 csm_get_locked_ssn_ctxt[539]: Lock not yet taken.
Mon Jul 1 06:13:11.878638 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(2937): Recieved sp acfg merge request for type: running cfg
Mon Jul 1 06:12:29.527840 (CSM_T) csm_pss_del_seq_tbl(1989): Freeing seq tbl data
Mon Jul 1 06:12:29.513255 (CSM_T) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3106): Done acfg file write
Mon Jul 1 06:12:29.513179 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(3011): Preparing config into /tmp/csm_sp_acfg_1733911262.txt
Mon Jul 1 06:12:29.508859 csm_get_locked_ssn_ctxt[539]: Lock not yet taken.
Mon Jul 1 06:12:29.508803 (CSM_EV) csm_sp_acfg_gen_handler(2937): Recieved sp acfg merge request for type: running cfg
Mon Jul 1 05:53:17.651236 Collecting peer info
Mon Jul 1 05:53:17.651181 Failed to get the argumentvalue for 'ip-address'
Mon Jul 1 05:40:59.262736 DB Unlocked Successfully
Mon Jul 1 05:40:59.262654 Unlocking DB, Lock Owner Details:Client:1 ID:1
Mon Jul 1 05:40:59.262570 (CSM_T) csm_sp_del_buf_cmd(1713): Deleting comand with Id = 1
Mon Jul 1 05:40:59.262513 DB Lock Successful by Client:1 ID:1
Mon Jul 1 05:40:59.262435 Recieved lock request by Client:1 ID:1
Mon Jul 1 05:40:41.741224 ssnmgr_ssn_handle_create_get: Session FSM already present, ID:1
Mon Jul 1 05:40:41.741167 ssnmgr_handle_mgmt_request: Create/Get request received for session[process_n5kprof]
show cfs lock gives no output.
Just to further clarify, we have 4 5548UP switches in the same management vlan. 2 switches are in one location lets say location A and they are CFS peers and are working fine.
These two switches which are having problem are in location B. All the switches are in the same vlan. Essentially the all CFS multicast messages will be seen by all 5548 switches as they are in the same vlan. I am assuming that this might not create any problems as we specify the peers in the respective configurations. Or do we have to change the CFSoIPv4 multicast addresses in location B or may be configure a different region.
Regards.

Cisco Nexus 3000 ssh access

I have a Cisco Nexus 3172T in a small environment running System version: 6.0(2)U3(1). I am using a vlan as management access, i.e. vlan100 is on every device and is using for snmp/ssh access. On the same switch I have one non-switchport (routed) port (eth1/6 in this case) connecting to a remote datacenter. I am able to SNMP poll and ping the vlan100 interface on the switch from everywhere, and I am able to SSH login while I am connected on any of the VLANs that are known to the switch. My problem comes when trying to access (SSH) the switch from the remote datacenter location (SNMP/Ping also works from the remote location). The only way to SSH access the switch from the remote location is only if I SSH in on the routed port (i.e. eth 1/6).
I am not using the dedicated management port on the switch (nor I have any plans in the future). I am also running very plain config, a few switchports, one routed port, and the default control-plane policy (which is only policy pps). There are the ACLs on the VTY.
Am I running into a known bug or is there some configuration requirement to allow this ?
thanks
dragan

Its not in a VRF or anything like that is it?
Also have you tried setting the ssh source interface to be vlan 100.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus3000/sw/security/6x/b_Cisco_n3k_Security_Config_6x/b_Cisco_n3k_Security_Config_6x_chapter_0110.html#task_4AFC76AF5CD04C728EF30CB15EAE2655

Enabling ECN marking on Cisco nexus 3064

Hi,
I have a requirement to enable ECN marking on CIsco nexus 3064 switch. ECT(0) traffic is being switched.
Tried the below configs, But not quite helping.
==================================
n# sh policy-map type network-qos nq_pm_1
Type network-qos policy-maps
===============================
policy-map type network-qos nq_pm_1
    class type network-qos nq_cm_1
      mtu 1500
      congestion-control random-detect ecn
    class type network-qos class-default
      mtu 1500
     congestion-control random-detect ecn
n# sh run | beg "system qos"
system qos
service-policy type qos input iscsi
service-policy type network-qos nq_pm_1
n# sh policy-map type queuing pqu
Type queuing policy-maps
========================
policy-map type queuing pqu
    class type queuing cqu
      random-detect minimum-threshold 10 packets maximum-threshold 350 packets
      bandwidth percent 50
    class type queuing class-default
      bandwidth percent 50
      random-detect minimum-threshold 5 packets maximum-threshold 5 packets
n# sh run int e1/21
!Command: show running-config interface Ethernet1/21
!Time: Tue Apr 29 09:04:35 2014
version 5.0(3)U5(1b)
interface Ethernet1/21
no switchport
service-policy type queuing output pqu
ip address 15.0.20.1/24
what could possibly be missing?
Thanks
Jose.

Duplicate post.
Go here: http://supportforums.cisco.com/discussion/12190426/ecn-marking-cisco-nexus-3064

3850 - auto qos voip cisco-phone

I am having an issue where it appears that the "auto qos voip cisco-phone" command is marking down my voice packets COS and DSCP values to 0. Anyone else notice this? I am connecting Cisco 7945 phone to the interfaces with this command applied to the interface. I verified that the IP Phone is sending COS = 5 and DSCP = ef to the switchport. I verified the packets inbound to the switchport and the packets outbound as they transit to the destination IP Phone's switchport.

Hi joshua,
What is the IOS-XE version you are running on your 3850 ?
Post your switchport configuration (7945 phone connected)
Here is 3.3 QoS config guide & I noticed it says something like below qouted. So make sure this trust device command is there & your port is configured for standard VoIP port connectivity.(like voice vlan, etc)
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3850/software/release/3se/consolidated_guide/configuration_guide/b_consolidated_3850_3se_cg/b_consolidated_3850_3se_cg_chapter_01101000.html#reference_8A1C35AB2874498F90C4F5600301BE9D
"The trust device device_type interface configuration command is only supported in an auto-QoS configuration, and not as a stand-alone command on the switch. When using the trust device device_type interface configuration command in an auto-QoS configuration, if the connected peer device is not a corresponding device (defined as a device matching your trust policy), both CoS and DSCP values are set to "0" and any input policy will not take effect"
HTH
Rasika
***** Pls rate all useful responses ****

VSM and Cisco nexus 1000v

Hi,
We are planning to install Cisco Nexus 1000v in our environment. Before we want to install we want to explore little bit about Cisco Nexus 1000v
• I know there is 2 elements for Cisco 1k, VEM and VSM. Does VSM is required? Can we configure VEM individually?
• How does Nexus 1k integrated with vCenter. Can we do all Nexus 1000v configuration from vCenter without going to VEM or VSM?
• In term of alarming and reporting, does we need to get SNMP trap and get from individual VEM or can be use VSM to do that. OR can we get Cisco Nexus 1000v alarming and reporting form VMware vCenter.
• Apart from using Nexus 1010 can what’s the recommended hosting location for VSM, (same Host as VEM, different VM, and different physical server)
Foyez Ahammed

Hi Foyez,
Here is a brief on the Nexus1000v and I'll answer some of your questions in that:
The Nexus1000v is a Virtual Distributed Switch (software based) from Cisco which integrated with the vSphere environment to provide uniform networking across your vmware environment for the host as well as the VMs. There are two components to the N1K infrastructure 1) VSM 2) VEM.
VSM - Virtual supervisor module is the one which controls the entire N1K setup and is from where the configuration is done for the VEM modules, interfaces, security, monitoring etc. VSM is the one which interacts with the VC.
VEM - Virtual ethernet module are simply the module or virtual linecards which provide the connectivity option or virtual ports for the VMs and other virtaul interfaces. Each ESX host today can only have one VEM. These VEMs recieve their configuration / programing from the VSM.
If you are aware of any other switching products from Cisco like the Cat 6k switches, the n1k behaves the same way but in a software / virtual environment. Where the VSM are equal of a SUPs and the VEM are similar to the line cards. The control and the packet VLANs in the n1k provide the same kind of AIPC and Inband connectivity as the 6k backplane would for the communication between the modules and the SUP (VSM in this case).
*The n1k configuration is done only from the VSM and is visible in the VC.However the port-profiles created from the VSM are pushed from the VSM to the VC and have to be assigned to the virtual / physical ports from the VC.
*You can run the VSM either on the Nexus1010 as a Virtual service blade (VSB) or as a normal VM on any of the ESX/ESXi server. The VSM and the VEM on the same server are fully supported.
You can refer the following deployment guide for some more details: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/guide_c07-556626.html
Hope this answers your queries!
./Abhinav

Cisco Nexus IP SLA

1. Does Cisco Nexus 7K, 5K support IP SLA?
2. If so, is it covered under base license?
For 7K, I'm running 5.1 with the following licenses.
* LAN_ADVANCED_SERVICES_PKG
* LAN_ENTERPRISE_SERVICES_PKG
For 5K, I'm running 5.0.2 with the following licenses
* ENTERPRISE_PKG
* FC_FEATURES_PKG

Hey I was wondering if this Feature is available yet? If so what is the version OS I need to upgrade to. I am currently running
System version: 5.1(3)
Thanks

Cisco LAN Management Solution is required to support Cisco Nexus 5548P and 5596UP switches?

Hi,
Could someone help to know what Cisco LAN Management Solution is required to support Cisco Nexus 5548P switches and Cisco Nexus 5596UP switches?
These new Cisco switches are being implementing on customer network and he ask us that he requires these equipments be supported on a LMS solution (customer currently is using LMS 3.2.1)
Can someone help?
Thanks in advanced,
guruiz

Some very limited Nexus support is present in LMS 3.2.1 - see the supported device table here.
To get more complete support, including the 5596UP, they need to upgrade to LMS 4.x (e.g. LMS 4.2.2 is the latest and is sold under the Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.2 umbrella). The major upgrade from 3.x to 4.x requires purchasing an upgrade license.
Some functions (namely User Tracking ) will not be available on the 5k due to non-support of the requisite MIB on the device. I believe LMS still doesn't let you do VLAN management on 5k's - you need to use DCNM for that if you want to do it from a GUI.
See the table here for LMS 4.2 device support.

Cisco Nexus 3K Layer 3 Connectivity Issue while using Optical SFP

Dear All,
Am facing L3 reachability issue between N3k switched, even in same subnet. Also checked that VLAN is allowed under trunk port.
I can able to see the switch details as CDP neighbour.
We are using SVI, and found all the SVI and Interface protocol status is up/up. So to test I use a host to directly connect N3k with Optical SFP in access port, found failure on reachability, but while replacing with SFP ethernet module instead of SFP optical module reachability is okay.
Please help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Kannan,

Hello Amit,
Pls find the following details..
We use SFP-10G-LR Modules on both end, we also replaced and checked with SFP-10G-SR modules as well..
Software
BIOS: version 1.9.0
loader: version N/A
kickstart: version 6.0(2)A1(1b)
system: version 6.0(2)A1(1b)
Power Sequencer Firmware:
Module 1: version v3.1
BIOS compile time: 10/13/2012
kickstart image file is: bootflash:///n3500-uk9-kickstart.6.0.2.A1.1b.bin
kickstart compile time: 9/5/2013 14:00:00 [09/05/2013 22:37:16]
system image file is: bootflash:///n3500-uk9.6.0.2.A1.1b.bin
system compile time: 9/5/2013 14:00:00 [09/06/2013 02:25:01]
Hardware
cisco Nexus 3548 Chassis ("48x10GE Supervisor")
Thanks for the reply,and sry for my delayed response..

Cisco Nexus 5548UP - Enhanced vPC

Hello,
We will be deploying a new Cisco Nexus 5K environment with 2248 FEX's.
The firewall in the environment (non-Cisco), only supports static Port-channels - i.e "ON" configuration and not LACP.
For redundancy we will be patching it into the environment in a topology where VLAN's are trunked and connected to two FEX modules as on page 2 of this document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus5000/sw/mkt_ops_guides/513_n1_1/n5k_enhanced_vpc.pdf
Every example I've seen online uses LACP instead of a static Port-channel. My questions are:
Will this cause any issues in the event of port failure?
Is this best practice?
Are there any "gotchas" or caveats with this design?
Many thanks in advance.
Jacob

I always like to use LACP where and when I can. Some devices, like your firewall and vmware do not support LACP. As long as both devices are configured correctly and using mode-on, there should be no issues with this. I do not like mode-on for this reason, as it does not negotiate anything before bringing up the port-channel. Therefore just confirm it is configured as mode-on on both sides and you should be fine. This should not cause any disruption if one link fails, but I would test the configuration before putting this into production.

Cisco Nexus 1000v stops inheriting

Guys,
I have an issue with the Nexus 1000v, basically the trunk ports on the ESXi hosts stop inheriting from the main DATA-UP link port profile, which means that not all VLANS get presented down that given trunk port, its like it gets completey out of sync somehow. An example is below,
THIS IS A PC CONFIG THAT'S NOT WOKRING CORRECTLY
show int trunk
Po9        100,400-401,405-406,412,430,434,438-439,446,449-450,591,850
sh run int po9
interface port-channel9
inherit port-profile DATA-UP
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 438-439,446,449-450,591,850 (the system as added this not user)
THIS IS A PC CONFIG THAT IS WORKING CORRECTLY
show int trunk
Po2        100,292,300,313,400-401,405-406,412,429-430,434,438-439,446,449-450,582,591,850
sh run int po2
interface port-channel2
    inherit port-profile DATA-UP
I have no idea why this keeps happening, when i remove the manual static trunk configuration on po9, everything is fine, few days later, it happens again, its not just po9, there is at least 3 port-channel that it affects.
My DATA-UP link port-profile configuration looks like this and all port channels should reflect the VLANs allowed but some are way out.
port-profile type ethernet DATA-UP
vmware port-group
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk allowed vlan 100,292,300,313,400-401,405-406,412,429-430,434,438-439,446,449-450,5
82,591,850
channel-group auto mode on sub-group cdp
no shutdown
state enabled
The upstream switches match the same VLANs allowed and the VLAN database is a mirror image between Nexus and Upstream switches.
The Cisco Nexus version is 4.2.1
Anyone seen this problem?
Cheers

Using vMotion you can perform the entire upgrade with no disruption to your virtual infrastructure.
If this is your first upgrade, I highly recommend you go through the upgrade guides in detail.
There are two main guides. One details the VSM and overall process, the other covers the VEM (ESX) side of the upgrade. They're not very long guides, and should be easy to follow.
1000v Upgrade Guide:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_2_1_s_v_1_4_a/upgrade/software/guide/n1000v_upgrade_software.html
VEM Upgrade Guides:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/datacenter/nexus1000/sw/4_2_1_s_v_1_4_a/install/vem/guide/n1000v_vem_install.html
In a nutshell the procedure looks like this:
-Backup of VSM Config
-Run pre-upgrade check script (which will identify any config issues & ensures validation of new version with old config)
-Upgrade standby VSM
-Perform switchover
-Upgrade image on old active (current standby)
-Upgrade VEM modules
One decision you'll need to make is whether to use Update Manager or not for the VEM upgrades. If you don't have many hosts, the manual method is a nice way to maintain control on exactly what's being upgrade & when. It will allow you to migrate VMs off the host, upgrade it, and then continue in this manner for all remaining hosts. The alternate is Update Manager, which can be a little sticky if it runs into issues. This method will automatically put hosts in Maintenance Mode, migrate VMs off, and then upgrade each VEM one by one. This is a non-stop process so there's a little less control from that perspective.   My own preference is any environment with 10 or less hosts, I use manual, for more than that let VUM do the work.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
Regards,
Robert

Cisco Nexus 5596UP SFP Problem

Hi All,
We are using Cisco Nexus 5596UP on DC.
we want to use 1g-mm gbic for fiber connection, but do not link up
sh int 1/29 trans det
    transceiver is present
    type is 1000base-SX
    name is CISCO-FINISAR
    part number is FTRJ-8519-7D-CSC
    revision is --
    serial number is FNS0841A2RK
    nominal bitrate is 1200 MBit/sec
    Link length supported for 50/125um fiber is 550 m
    Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 300 m
    cisco id is --
    cisco extended id number is 4
   Transceiver calibration is invalid
sh int eth 1/29
Ethernet1/29 is down (Link not connected)
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 0005.73e8.bea4 (bia 0005.73e8.bea4)
Description: Zer_fiber
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 0/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is access
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
Input flow-control is off, output flow-control is off
Rate mode is dedicated
Switchport monitor is off
EtherType is 0x8100
Last link flapped never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters 07:11:12
30 seconds input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
30 seconds output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 bytes/sec, 0 packets/sec
Load-Interval #2: 5 minute (300 seconds)
    input rate 0 bps, 0 pps; output rate 0 bps, 0 pps
RX
    0 unicast packets 928 multicast packets 0 broadcast packets
    928 input packets 6764 bytes
    0 jumbo packets 0 storm suppression bytes
    0 giants 928 input error 0 short frame 0 overrun   0 underrun
    0 watchdog 0 if down drop
    0 input with dribble 0 input discard
    0 Rx pause
TX
    0 unicast packets 0 multicast packets 0 broadcast packets
    0 output packets 0 bytes
    0 jumbo packets
    0 output errors 0 collision 0 deferred 0 late collision
    0 lost carrier 0 no carrier 0 babble
    0 Tx pause
0 interface resets

Hi,
We are using 1000Base-SX SFP in N7K with release 6.0.2,
But, we can't use 1000Base-SX in 5596UP with release 5.0(3)N2(2b)
1000Base-SX writes are supported on the web page you suggested. However, in accordance with the following configuration does not work.
sh run int eth1/29
interface Ethernet1/29
switchport access vlan 645
speed 1000
duplex full
sh int status | inc 1/29
Port          Name               Status    Vlan      Duplex Speed   Type
Eth1/29       ---          notconnec 645       full    1000    1/10g
sh int eth 1/29
Ethernet1/29 is down (Link not connected) - But link connected...
Hardware: 1000/10000 Ethernet, address: 0005.73e8.bea4 (bia 0005.73e8.bea4)
Description: ---
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
     reliability 0/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA
Port mode is access
full-duplex, 1000 Mb/s, media type is 10G
Beacon is turned off
sh int eth 1/29 transceiver details
Ethernet1/29
    transceiver is present
    type is 1000base-SX
    name is CISCO-FINISAR
    part number is FTRJ-8519-7D-CSC
    revision is --
    serial number is FNS0841A2RK
    nominal bitrate is 1200 MBit/sec
    Link length supported for 50/125um fiber is 550 m
    Link length supported for 62.5/125um fiber is 300 m
    cisco id is --
    cisco extended id number is 4
   Transceiver calibration is invalid
thank you for your interest
Regards,
Yücel

Vlan base Qos on Cisco Nexus 5K

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for