VLAN for AP interface

Hello,
could you help me is it best practice to place LAP-AP interfaces to magement VLAN?
Thanks in advance

ok, is it safe to place LAPs to in-band management VLAN?

Similar Messages

  • VLAN for WLC interface (ISE Policies Based on SSID)

    I have ISE 1.1 and WLC 2504
    I used this link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11640/products_configuration_example09186a0080bed902.shtml
    But I am confuse on the WLC configuration
    If I have only one ESSID for corporate user(and many DATA vlan because each AD group is assosiated to one specific  VLAN)
    I have already created Management interface associated with management Vlan
    Wich interface interface should I associate on the corparate WAN ( WLAN  -->General --->Interface/interface group)  ?
    Should I create another interface ? wich Vlan ID should I associate to this interface
    or should I use Management  interface
    Please advise

    check the following links , they are very helpful:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9bd1.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10315/products_configuration_example09186a0080bc8129.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008076317c.shtml
    Please make sure to rate correct answers

  • Extending VLANs across routed interfaces

    Hello;
    I'm trying to create a L3 core network. The core equipment will be Cisco 3750 enhanced. My idea is make each link between core 3750 a routed interface, with /30 IP addresses.
    The problem is the customer needs some VLANs extended across the full enterprise. Is there any way to encapsulate the VLAN inside routed interface?
    Thanks in advance.

    I realize this thread is 5+ years old, but I feel like commenting anyway.
    If you want to encapsulate the vlan across that link, you won't be able to use routed interfaces.  You will need to use a layer 2 trunk(dot1q).  Therefore, I wouldn't bother with the /30 addresses unless you want to monitor that specific link by IP.  In that case, use a special VLAN just for those two interfaces and put your /30 addresses on the vlan interfaces.
    If you want fast fail over on a layer 2 link, well then, use Rapid STP.  The goal should be to get rid of those flat VLANs that span the core and switch to your original plan of routed interfaces using EIGRP or OSPF.

  • VLANs for the WiSM

    Hi Everybody,
    we followed the cisco layered model in our campus design where we have 6500 switch at the core, 4500 at the distribution and 3750 at the access layer.
    The connectivity between the core and the distribution is layer 3, the connectivity between the distribution and access layer is layer 2.we have all the intervlan routing on the distribution switches.we have recently installed two WiSM controllers in our core and planning to deploy light weight access points.
    we want to use the exiting VLANS that we created for the wired users on the distribution switch for Wireless LAN users . I wanted to know if this is possible because as the dynamic interfaces for the Wireless VLANS would be created on the WiSM that is on the core switch and as the dynamic interface are like SVIs for the Wireless VLANS.
    Secondly i wanted to know what does it mean to assign a VLAN to the WiSM
    Regards,
    Ahmed Zubedi

    I would recommend keeping the wired vlan separate from the wireless vlan.
    You need to assign a vlan for the service port of the controllers. This is local to the 6500 and is not routeable. This is how the controllers talk to the 6500. I normally do like a 192.168.1.x

  • Separate VLAN for manag. only on wire?

    I'm having hard time trying to understand how to configure Aironet 1200 in a way such that I have two VLANs (for example X and Y, both not 1) so that I have X for only management and management is not seen on wireless side at all, and Y for public traffic.
    I went thru' all the old postings about this subject but found no complete example of running config to do it. If anyone has successfully completed doing this, please, can you post a example of IOS command listing how to do it.
    Regards,
    Pauli Borodulin

    Here is a working config that I have. I have two wireless vlans (186, 187) and a third ethernet only vlan (101) which is the management vlan.
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption vlan 186 key 1 size 128bit 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    encryption vlan 186 key 2 size 128bit 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    encryption vlan 186 key 3 size 128bit 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx transmit-key
    encryption vlan 186 key 4 size 128bit 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    encryption vlan 186 mode wep mandatory
    encryption vlan 187 key 1 size 128bit 7 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx transmit-key
    encryption vlan 187 mode wep mandatory
    ssid weponly
    vlan 186
    authentication open
    ssid wepeap
    vlan 187
    authentication open eap eap_methods
    authentication network-eap eap_methods
    speed basic-1.0 basic-2.0 basic-5.5 basic-11.0
    rts threshold 2312
    channel 2412
    station-role root
    no cdp enable
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    interface Dot11Radio0.186
    encapsulation dot1Q 186
    no ip route-cache
    no cdp enable
    bridge-group 186
    bridge-group 186 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 186 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 186 source-learning
    no bridge-group 186 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 186 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio0.187
    encapsulation dot1Q 187
    no ip route-cache
    no cdp enable
    bridge-group 187
    bridge-group 187 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 187 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 187 source-learning
    no bridge-group 187 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 187 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    ntp broadcast client
    interface FastEthernet0.101
    encapsulation dot1Q 101 native
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 1
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.186
    encapsulation dot1Q 186
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 186
    no bridge-group 186 source-learning
    bridge-group 186 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0.187
    encapsulation dot1Q 187
    no ip route-cache
    bridge-group 187
    no bridge-group 187 source-learning
    bridge-group 187 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 172.25.101.17 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip default-gateway 172.25.101.1

  • Configuring Management VLAN for standalone Nexus 5k

    Hi All,
    The architecture in the attachment doesnt require redundancy and hence has a single N5k with N2k as FEX. The setup is working fine except for the management vlan and mgmt 0 interface being down.
    As of now, mgmt0 interface has no link connected to it. The VLAN for nexus management is also down as mgmt0 cant be assigned to vlans.. Configuring management IP to Loopback interface also doesnt allow adding the same to management vlan.
    Is mgmt0 an RJ45 compatible port with N5596? and is there a way I can have out of band management for Nexus 5596? Is there a way I can assign a management IP to the FEX?
    Thanks for the inputs.
    Thanks,
    Bala S

    Hello Balachandhar,
    Mgmt interface on N5K exists to provide out of band management to the device.
    Mgmt interface belongs to management vrf. You can reach the N5K on mgmt interface once you configure IP to mgmt interface and connect it to upstream switch port belonging to mgmt vlan.
    The FEX cannot be seperately managed. You need to connect to the parent N5K device and manage it.
    HTH
    Padma

  • Switch config for Inline Interface Pair

    Hello all
    Am having a doubt here, so need your help.
    I want to configure an IPS in inline interface mode. What I have is
    internet rtr---->Switch----->outside intrface of ASA
    Here, I want to monitor/inspect the traffic coming from the internet.
    I am planning to connect the inline interfaces to the same switch.
    What am not sure is what will be the switchport configuration for the inline interface pair?
    Also, How the switch will forward traffic to the IPS and then IPS to the ASA?
    Thanks in advance
    ..Abhi

    What are you using for an IPS, an appliance? an IOS IPS in the Internet router or the ASA?
    If you want to feed the output of your IPS into the same switch as the input, you'll need to create two separate VLANS, one for the switch interfaces that are outside your IPS and the other for the interfaces that are inside your IPS.
    interface Gi0/1
      switchport access vlan 10
    switchport mode access
    switchport nonegotiate
    interface Gi0/5
      switchport access vlan 20
    switchport mode access
    switchport nonegotiate
    interface vlan 10
    interface vlan 20
    - Bob

  • Vlan for dmz

    Can anyone tell me how to do a simple dmz on my router, its got 2 ethernet interfaces, I have set up a vlan for this on my switches, its for a e-mail server, !!
    Thanks
    Carl

    check out the following link :
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5413/products_feature_guide09186a0080235e23.html

  • Dedicated vlan for WLC

    Hi,
    In reviewing the lab for WLC configuration, they used a dedicated vlan for all APs and the WLC to communicate with CAPWAP.
    In the production environment I'm designing for, a campus network that has many LAN connected sites all with different vlans at the edge, that would entail trunking another vlan out to the edge switches. It also requires the MetroEthernet provider to provision the same beforehand.
    One of the advantages of the WLC is the ability to avoid having to add vlans at the edge for WLANs, but what about a dedicated vlan for the APs and WLC to communicate with CAPWAP? A best practice?
    Thanks.

    As best practice we've only two options, keep the AP on L2 vlan(not scalable) of management or on any L3(vlan that is not part of dynamic interface of WLC) which is scalable and good for highavailability.

  • VLAN for Management Traffic

    Hello Everyone,
    I'm still learning cisco and networks in general but I need to separate management traffic from the regular network.  The switch is a cisco catalyst 5406-E.  My question is do I need to create a new subnet for the VLAN and how would I do that? The commands I have to create a VLAN and add the switch ports are
    Switch(config)# vlan 15
    switch(config-vlan)# name Management
    switch(config)# interface GigabitEthernet2/6
    switch(config-if)# switchport access vlan 15
    Now this creates vlan 15 and adds the GE 2/6 interface to vlan 15.  How do I add it to a new subnet?  Am I going in the right direction?

    In general, if you want to use separated VLAN for management, you can create VLAN + SVI (routed interface of the VLAN) with IP address + some access list on SVI and VTY (“SSH/telnet lines”) for better security.
    Example:
    ==== C4500 – L3 SWITCH CONFIG ====
    //create VLAN 15
    vlan 15
    name MGMT
    //create access list with ip addresses, from which management of all switches with SVI 15 will be accessible
    //Note: this access list (ACL) does not control access to management of L3 switch/router where the ACL is applied on SVI, only to all other switches in VLAN 15 that have default gateway set to ip address 10.0.15.1 (see next step)
    ip access-list extended MGMT_SWITCH
    remark ====ICMP====
    permit icmp any 10.0.15.0 0.0.0.255
    remark ====ADMIN====
    permit ip 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.15.0 0.0.0.255
    remark ====MONIORING-SERVERS====
    permit ip 10.0.100.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.15.0 0.0.0.255
    remark ====NTB-SERVICE====
    permit ip 10.0.200.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.15.0 0.0.0.255
    //create SVI/interface of the VLAN 15, add IP address and assign access list
    //Note: DO NOT assign empty access list to interface, it can make your router inaccessible!
    interface Vlan15
    description MGMT
    ip address 10.0.15.1 255.255.255.0
    ip access-group MGMT_SWITCH out
    //create ACL for VTY line of L3 switch/router; this ACL controls access only to management of L3 switch, access to all other switches with SVI 15 is controlled by previous ACL
    ip access-list standard VTY
    remark ====ADMIN====
    permit 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255
    remark ====MONIORING-SERVERS====
    permit 10.0.100.0 0.0.0.255
    remark ====NTB-SERVICE====
    permit 10.0.200.0 0.0.0.255
    //assign ACL to vty lines
    line vty 0 4
    access-class VTY in
    ==== OTHER L2-ONLY SWITCHES CONFIG ====
    //create VLAN 15
    vlan 15
    name MGMT
    //create SVI 15
    interface Vlan15
    description MGMT
    ip address 10.0.15.50 255.255.255.0
    //set default gateway/default route to SVI of c4500
    ip default-gateway 10.0.15.1
    //some higher-level switches require use of following CLI parameters instead:
    ip routing
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.0.15.1
    This is just one of many ways to do the management separation.

  • Setting up 2 vlans for 2 pixs.

    I have a situation that I was trying to seek some assistance on. At this site, there are 2 Internet connections, 1 T1 and 1 Cable. Right now everything is going out the T1. They would like to add the cable ISP and a PIX 501 for guests and have all the Access Points using the Cable ISP and keep everything internal using the T1 like they are now. The current setup goes like this. T1 -> PIX 515 -> Cisco 4000 series router -> 2950. Would like the add the Cable -> PIX 501 -> 2950 -> AP. I know that I need to configure a VLAN for the wireless on the 2950s, but how would I configure a default route since the default route is being used already for the the other VLAN? I think that I am making this much more difficult than it really is.

    I hope I understand your question taht you want to install two ISP uplink into your pix.
    There is no chance to connect your pix to two ISPs, at same time only one ISP can be used as active. In 7.2 version there is the option for tracking and in this case the second ISP connection can become active.
    You can add maximum three default route, but using the same outside interface, but this is not acceptable for this scenario.
    If you install second PIX, just use in the guest VLAN as default GW the new PIX inside interface and that's all. On 2950 you just use L2 VLAN.
    bye
    FCS
    Please rate me if I helped.

  • What is the idea behind specifying the voice VLAN under the interface

    Hi,
    What is the idea behind specifying the voice VLAN under the interface? (Is it needed for both 802.1P and 802.1Q?)
    Regards
    M

    The voice vlan command is what tells the IP phone what VLAN it should use...
    The idea is that setting the native vlan on the port controls what VLAN the attached PC goes into, and the voice vlan tells the phone which VLAN it should go into.
    It doesn't have any direct relation to QoS, as the port could be configured to ignore or take action on QoS markings with or without the voice vlan command.
    Aaron

  • Distortion in Save For Web interface

    I am still having problems with my Save For Web interface. Attached is a screen where you can see that with just the Optimized view showing (in this case 72%), the picture looks as expected. But if I go to 2-up or 4-up views, the 2nd image (which was the 72% Optimized) is now all pixelated as if it were a GIF.

    OMG!  How many years have I been using this program and I have never noticed this until now?!?
    Sorry for the brain fart and thanks for pointing that out!!! 
    I am really having a good laugh at myself about this one!
    Jules

  • Hi all, i'm new and facing a problem while creating a new file for Xcode. I can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController".this problem happen after i upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version.Appreciate for any help rendered.

    Hi all, i'm new to Mac book & Xcode. I'm learning and facing problems while creating a new file for Xcode. Before i upgrade the software, i have no issue to create simple steps in apps. After upgrade Xcode to 4.6 version, i'm facing lot's of issue eg.
    1) "the identity "iphone developer" doesn't match any valid certificate/ private key pair",
    2) can't select the box "with XIB for user interface" if the subclass is "UIViewController"..
    Appreciate for any help rendered.

    Mikko777 wrote:So what is the best?
    I wouldn't judge. I've been to Arch for a week, you know? But as said, it's VERY close to it.
    What I dislike after a week is makepkg not handling dependencies automatically (which would be overhead, so probably not appropriate).
    Mikko777 wrote:Also theres KDEmod for modular kde, dunno if its for 64 bits tho.
    Don't actually need that as said ... I see no real benefit of having that other than not beeing a KDE user or having Gentoos useflags.
    Mikko777 wrote:PS:You produce a lot of text and welcome smile
    Yeah. Wonder why I'm still employed? So do I ...

  • Creation of Server Proxy for  Message interface with External Defination

    Dear All,
    I am getting a problem while generating a server proxy for the inbound interface . The request message used in the inbound interface is a external definition which is uploaded using a XSD file. The XSD file was supplied by a third party which is having very high complex strucuture and used lot of abstract data types in the design. When i tried to generate the proxy in the R/3 system (Transaction SPROXY) for the inbound interface i am getting following error.
    Interface uses external and internal message definitions
    Message no. SPRX122 *
    Diagnosis
    In a message interface you can use messages from different sources:
    Message types and fault message types edited in the Enterprise Services Repository
    Messages imported into the Enterprise Services Repository (external definitions, RFC, IDoc)
    In the current message interface, message types from different sources have been used. Since messages from these different sources must be handled differently during proxy generation, such a mixture of messages within a message interface is not possible.
    System Response
    The interface cannot be generated.
    Procedure
    Change the interface definition accordingly in the Enterprise Services Repository.
    Please guide me, how to generate the proxy for the interface with external defination message. I could nt geneate manullay, because it is having very high complexity and its a big structure.
    Is there is any way to generate the proxy for interface with external definition
    Regards
    Vijayanand

    Hi,
    i.       Import your message schemas from external definitions, or RFCs or IDocs from SAP systems. These definitions already contain data types.
    ii.       Create a message interface and reference the messages of the external definition, or the RFC or IDoc message.
    Check this, it may help you
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/3f/01623c4f69b712e10000000a114084/content.htm
    REgards
    Seshagiri

Maybe you are looking for