Vlan Interface bit rate

Hi
My management server see's Vlan interfaces at 1Gb interface. What is the actual Bit rate it can handle? lets say for a 6509E sup720 10gig.

Hello pcConvert,
I usually use Lossless but seeing that you have an iBook, I wouldn't try that unless you have a small collection or a big external hard drive. I usually use my 250 GB FW800 drive to store my music instead of my main computer.
For portables, like the iPod, I usually just stick to 128 kbps.
If Lossless was not an option, I'd go to 192 at the very least if using MP3 or 128 for AACs.

Similar Messages

  • Ip nbar bit-rate

    I have a problem with the ip nbar in routers when I configure the interface fastethernet using dot1q. It doesn´t show de bit-rate and max-bit rate for the other vlans than 1.
    FastEthernet0/0.1
    Input Output
    Protocol 30sec Bit Rate (bps) 30sec Bit Rate (bps)
    sna 3000 4000
    snmp 3000 2000
    http 0 0
    proxy 0 0
    dns 0 0
    ssh 0 0
    eigrp 0 0
    ldap 0 0
    imap 0 0
    pbx 0 0
    unknown 0 0
    Total 6000 6000
    FastEthernet0/0.2
    Input Output
    Protocol 30sec Bit Rate (bps) 30sec Bit Rate (bps)
    MS_T_SVR 0 0
    imap 0 0
    smtp 0 0
    sna 0 0
    proxy 0 0
    ssh 0 0
    http 0 0
    dns 0 0
    ldap 0 0
    webdav 0 0
    unknown 0 0
    Total 0 0

    I have a problem with the ip nbar in routers when I configure the interface fastethernet using dot1q. It doesn´t show de bit-rate and max-bit rate for the other vlans than 1.
    FastEthernet0/0.1
    Input Output
    Protocol 30sec Bit Rate (bps) 30sec Bit Rate (bps)
    sna 3000 4000
    snmp 3000 2000
    http 0 0
    proxy 0 0
    dns 0 0
    ssh 0 0
    eigrp 0 0
    ldap 0 0
    imap 0 0
    pbx 0 0
    unknown 0 0
    Total 6000 6000
    FastEthernet0/0.2
    Input Output
    Protocol 30sec Bit Rate (bps) 30sec Bit Rate (bps)
    MS_T_SVR 0 0
    imap 0 0
    smtp 0 0
    sna 0 0
    proxy 0 0
    ssh 0 0
    http 0 0
    dns 0 0
    ldap 0 0
    webdav 0 0
    unknown 0 0
    Total 0 0

  • Netflow on 6509 in Native Mode from Vlan Interface

    I'm trying to get a 6509-E, running Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software (s72033_rp-IPSERVICES_WAN-M), Version 12.
    2(33)SXI9, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2), to send netflow traffic from a vlan interface to a Solarwinds server.
    The server is not seeing all the vlan traffic, but does see all the traffic on the layer 2 ports (not netflow).
    I've seen that a command, ip flow ingress layer2-switched vlan, needs to be enabled, but the OS I have does not support that command.
    Or could it be that MLS is not configured except for a couple commands:
    mls netflow interface
    mls cef error action reset 
    netflow setup:
    Flow export v5 is enabled for main cache
      Export source and destination details :
      VRF ID : Default
        Source(1)       10.31.101.1 (Vlan52)
        Destination(1)  10.30.2.196 (2055)
      Version 5 flow records
      14927339 flows exported in 615072 udp datagrams
      0 flows failed due to lack of export packet
      0 export packets were sent up to process level
      0 export packets were dropped due to no fib
      0 export packets were dropped due to adjacency issues
      0 export packets were dropped due to fragmentation failures
      0 export packets were dropped due to encapsulation fixup failures
      0 export packets were dropped enqueuing for the RP
      0 export packets were dropped due to IPC rate limiting
      0 export packets were dropped due to Card not being able to export  
    interface:
    interface Vlan52
     description AN.VDI.stu
     ip address 10.31.101.1 255.255.255.0
     ip helper-address 10.31.149.200
     no ip redirects
     ip flow ingress
     ip flow egress
     ip pim neighbor-filter 98
     ip pim sparse-dense-mode
     ip cgmp

    Enabling MLS was the fix.
    mls netflow interface
    mls flow ip interface-full
    mls nde sender version 5
    mls cef error action reset   

  • VPLS with IP in the vlan interface

    I have this config in a Cat6500:
    l2 vfi XXX manual
    vpn id XXX
    neighbor 1.1.1.1
    interface vlan XXX
    ip addrr 2.2.2.2
    xconnect vfi XXX
    With this config I can't reach from 6500 other equipments on this vlan with vpls.
    It is ok to setup an ip address in a VLAN interface even if the interface have VPLS "xconnect" configuration?

    Hi Guys,
    I would like to put my idea only but i do't know if it is correct or not.
    but if we defice any ip address on the interface than this will help us to improve anything but will appear in the routing table of PE router and it could be a part of it's routing and MPLS which is not required.
    secondly we are trying to emulate layer2 briedge accross the VPLS backbone not the Layer 3 switch domain. than it could be possible that you configure routing accross the backbone but there is no such kind of mechanism to enable routing.
    please rate if it helps.
    Kamlesh SHarma

  • FWSM vlan interface

    Hello, quick question I hope someone can help with.
    Is it possible for me to create 2 vlan interfaces on the 6500 and have them both in the same subnet?
    For a specific customer requirement I would like to have a vlan interface on the 6500 as default gateway, sat in it's own vrf, and then route all traffic inbound and outbound to this vlan through the FWSM interface, preferably in the same subnet. I don't think this will be possible so just looking for confirmation either way.
    As I will be running EIGRP between a pair of central 6500's and 2 remote offices it will make things much easier for me advertise the connected FWSM interfaces in to EIGRP for access in/out of all my VRF'd subnets. If I need another subnet for each VRF FWSM next hop then I'll have to reditribute a list of statics which I don't really want to do.
    The reason I am not just using the FWSM as gateway is because I need to run HSRP across 3 different devices (another 6500 in a second suite), and failover FWSM will only give me 1 level of redundancy for those gateways.
    Hope that makes sense, let me know if you have further questions.
    Thanks

    Thanks Marvin. You do understand the question, and it occurred to me after writing the above that I could just use a single FWSM inside interface and route in and out of each VRF via that 1 interface (All VRF's belong to a single customer, just required for segregation of internal traffic).
    The third 6500 running HSRP will be located in a DC 100km away connected via dual 1Gb circuits (3ms latency), and has it's own default route to a pair of ASA 5520's. If both FWSM's go down then the gateway will go live in the second site and traffic will be switched over our SP qinq tunnel to that gateway. Relevant BGP bits (MED), etc. will also be in place for seemless failover and traffic flow to and from the /23 pi range peered with the same ISP in each location..
    Thanks again.
    Chris

  • Ipv6 Vlan Interface EUI-64 assignation problem

    Hello, I have 2 routers 1800 series with switch modules incorporated connected with IPv6. Everything is working fine except for the problem that when I assign an IPv6 address to a Vlan (using the EUI-64 format to the switch ports), it assigns the SAME interface id (last 64 bits of the IPv6) of a fastEthernet port (FE 0/0), to the vlan, causing an error problem of duplicity:
    " c..T, overlaps with another prefix "
    Why does the EUI-64 assigns the MAC address of the FastEthernet ports instead of the ones in the switch modules?

    Thanks for the reply, but I just solved the problem. The problem was with the command IPV6 ADDRESS AUTOCONFIGURATION. This command definitely brings up a lot of trouble with VLAN ipv6 address assignation.
    After some testing I concluded that:
    1- If one interface has the IPV6 ADDRESS AUTOCONFIGURATION mode on, the interface could end up with more than one ipv6 global interface address.
    2- You cannot assign this mode to a vlan interface without getting into configuration problems.
    3- If a FastEthernet Interface has this mode on(IPV& A. A.), the router does not let you assign a global unicast address to the vlan interface, and gives the following error message:
    %IPV6-6-ADDRESS: 3FFE:C00:C18:F100:213:C4FF:FE44:4961/64 can not be configurex
    4- For the VLAN`s Interface ID you have to manually assign the link local address with the command line
    IPV6 ADDRESS FE80::1 (or any other unique link local address) LINK-LOCAL.
    This is for Vlans that are in a switch module of the same router.
    All this testing was for a Cisco router 1800 series with a switch module integrated in the router.
    Could be that this command is used for other specific occasions which I am not aware of.
    Regards,
    Grupo GTD

  • Random import bit rates?????????

    My import settings are set to: 192kbps 48Khz AAC with NO variable bit rate. For some random reason itunes stated importing my music at random bit rates usually 3 to 7 kbps below my set rate. I decided to "factory refresh" my computer as it was time hoping it would fix the issue but nothing had seemed to fix it unless I install itunes 6.X and even then its a pain. 192 MP3 works great but the AAC encoder is having issues. Any suggestions? itunes says: "encoded with itunes v7.5.0.20, quicktime 7.3.1." is there a new codec or anything.

    As I believe first came to light in this thread - courtesy of a heads-up from Flynn and verification and a workaround (if it really bothers you) by b noir - there was a so-far undocumented change in the new version of QuickTime (QuickTime actually being responsible for encoding song files in iTunes) which came bundled with iTunes 7.5.
    QuickTime no longer supports Constant Bit Rate Encoding. In its place is Average Bit Rate Encoding.
    Although this change is not reflected in the iTunes User Interface, it accounts for the new state of affairs that you noted.

  • HSRP Issues on VLAN interfaces

    We are experiencing an issue with HSRP and VLANS. We have the VLANS tracked to physical interfaces, with the default decrement value of 10.
    When we physically fail the fiber circuit (pull fiber transmit) the physical port reports down condition. The VLAN reports that it is still up. BOTH routers report that they are the active router and connectivity is lost.
    When the physical port is shut down, the failover takes place and the routers report their state as predicted.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    These routers are 4506's running 12.1(19)EW code
    on WS-X4515 module.

    If there are still active ports, then I would expect the VLAN interface to stay UP on both routers. However, I would not normally expect both routers to be ACTIVE. Could it be that when you take down these physical links, that the routers lose sight of each other as far as the Hellos are concerned?
    About the "If there are still active ports" bit ... don't gorget that a trunk can also constitute an active port in this sense. So if you have go any access switches uplinked to these 4506s, the trunks will be enough to keep the VLAN interface alive.
    Remember also that HSRP has a hold time of only 9 seconds by default, whereas 802.1d Spanning Tree has a convergence time up to 50 seconds by default. So it is possible that if the link you are disconnecting is the active root port of a switch, that the two HSRP routers will lose sight of each other. In that case,they can both become active for a few seconds. Effectively, during the STP convergence the VLAN can be partitioned. It all depends on your topology.
    You are pulling only the transmit fiber. I wonder if enabling UDLD would help here.
    As Georg says, it would be useful to know a bit more about the topology and the configuration.
    Kevin Dorrell
    Luxembourg

  • Problem with bit rate ?

    Hi there,
    Using FCP7.
    After compressing a FCP project with Compressor and burning DVDSP with DVDSP, I realized that  scenes containing objects or people in rapid movement where showing jerked images.
    The slow motion scenes are fine.
    I checked the following
    settings for DVDSP burning: VBR two pass;
    averageBit rate  4,0,
    max rate 7,0
    1) the self-contained QT that I started with is not showing this problem.
    2) the m2v file obtained from compressor (I use preset setting for high quality compression) does not show this problem when I view it with MPEG streamclip
    3) I tried to burn directly the QT file  with Toast 10 …get same problem if not worse !.
    settings for Toast
    automatic re-encoding
    average rate 4,0 Mbps
    max bit rate 8,0 Mbps
    MPEG-2
    I guess my problem comes from the bit rate I used ?
    I am now confused and I am not sure I understood the impact of the bit rate setting on the quality of the resulting DVD, and I believe that using a high bit rate in DVDSP might result in problems for some clients to play the DVD on their player ?
    Could it be something else ?
    could someone please give me advice ?
    Many thanks in advance
    Ivan

    I can only think of two possibilities based on the info available:
    1. Old DVD player (choking on the bitrate spike)
    2. You need to set some compression markers around the scenes while in FCP. This would flag Compressor to pay extra attention to that area. After you output the new clip, I suggest you use the standard High Quality preset (in Compressor) for your program duration e.g., "Highest Quality 90 minute". Don't get creative with the encoding set-up. And ALWAYS used AC-3 audio.

  • Controlling output video bit rate in FCPX

    I ran into a problem: I created a mp4 file with Share/Export File… (settings: Computer, H.264 Faster Encode, 1920x1080 - edited from an HD camera): its video always freezes at a definite point when played on my BD Player connected to my HDTV through HDMI (audio instead continues on the frozen image).
    It seem that the issue is a sudden video bit rate pick of almost 50 Mbps while its average is around 20-30 Mbps. It is not clear to me if this freeze is caused by the BD Player or by the HDTV not being able to handle such pick.
    As a test I used Compressor to control the output bit rate (settings: average 20 Mbps and pick 25 Mbps) and this seems to fix the problem. To be more certain I should do more tests, but I'm confident I found a possible solution.
    I'd like to know if there is a way in FCPX to control such picks (without using Compressor), either in the Share commands (but it seems to me that they don't provide enough setting controls) or in the timeline. By watching the Video Scopes I can see a quite strong signal in the area where the output file has the bit rate pick. But I don't know any way to have a measure useful to identify them before sharing and avoid a trial and error approach...
    Piero
    Below the critical point...

    Tried to upload a PDF instead of PNG, but no luck. The picture shows a quite standard (I'd say...) image but with highly dense graphic of Y' component in the Y'CbCr Parade (in the limits of 0-100 IRE): much more dense than most images in the rest of the movie. So I assume this might mean a higher bit rate... but it's just an assumption.
    Let me summarize my tests:
    1st test: FCPX: Share/Export File.. (settings: Computer, H.264 Faster Encode, 1920x1080)
    - copied the .mp4 file to USB drive
    - USB drive into a BD player connected to HDTV through HDMI >> freezing effect
    2nd test: FCPX: Send to Compressor - Compressor: Create Blu-Ray Disk (on Hard Drive) and Video Job with standard Video settings (Automatically select bit rates = ON)
    - Played the .img disk with "Mac Blu-Ray Player" on my iMac >> same freezing effect in same position as before on HDTV
    3rd test: FCPX: Send to Compressor - Compressor: Create Blu-Ray Disk (on Hard Drive) and Video Job with customized Video settings: Automatically select bit rates = OFF - Average = 20 Mbps - Maximum = 25 Mbps
    - Played the .img disk with "Mac Blu-Ray Player" on my iMac >> NO MORE freezing effect (and smaller file by 30%)
    I might do more tests (mainly on my HDTV) but I believe the point is the bit rate... and the only way to control it is by using Compressor.
    So now my question: is there a color setting that helps in controlling such situation ? e.g. lower saturation, or lower exposure, maybe in mid tones or highlights, or what ?
    Thanks so much for your help
    Piero

  • PROBLEM with 24/96 bit-rate USB DAC that worked fine until I plugged in two

    I'm using a late 2008 15" Macbook Pro that I bought Jan 2009 right before the SD card models came out. Mac OSX 10.6.4 and iTunes 9.2 are installed. I have a Nuforce Icon HDP and a CEntrance DACport 24/96 bit-rate USB DAC (external sound cards) that still work great right now. Note - 16 bit/44 Khz is CD quality, and these 24/96 files are hi-resolution downloads that are closer to SACD or DVD audio.
    I have been evaluating a new third 24/96 USB DAC plugged directly into the Macbook USB port (no hub) which has been working fine for over 2 weeks with 24/96 bit-rate lossless music files in iTunes. Audio Midi Setup is set for 24/96 to match the music file's resolution. After making suggestions to the manufacturer they made some improvements and sent me a new version to listen for the differences.
    I listened to the new one for a day and it worked fine, but when I plugged in the original test sample into the second USB port at the same time as the new one in order to compare them, the sound became garbled and noisy. This never happened when either one was plugged in by itself. Note, if I make changes to the DAC's bit-rate in Audio Midi Setup I usually close iTunes first and then re-open it when I am done.
    Upon hearing this new problem I unplugged both of the new USB DACs and plugged just one of them back in, but now it causes iTunes music playback to pause when one is plugged in and set for 24/96 in audio midi setup. Prior to plugging in both at the same time, either one worked just fine by itself. There is no reason when unplugging one or the other that they shouldn't start working again. But now I can't play any 24/96 music through either one anymore. In quicktime player the songs don't pause like with iTunes, but there is no sound coming through even with just one DAC plugged in at a time. Then I discovered that if I go into Audio Midi Setup application and lower the bit rate to 24/48 then iTunes will resume playing again and I can hear the music fine with iTunes or Quicktime player.
    Basically, my Macbook Pro has now lost the ability to play 24/96 bit rate with either of these new USB DACs, when they both worked fine before I plugged them in at the same time. More confusing is that they use the same USB receiver chip as in one of the DACs that I mentioned above in the first paragraph, and both the HDP and DACport still work fine at 24/96 bit-rate. It's only these two new USB DAC that require me to lower the bit rate in Audio Midi Setup to 24/48 in order to listen through them, and this wasn't a problem as recently as yesterday!
    The computer is acting like some setting needs to be wiped out - it's DEFINITELY NOT the USB DAC's that are faulty because they still both work fine at 24/96 on my wife's iMac (I'm afraid to try plugging in both at the same time to the iMac in case I screw that Mac up too).
    I have reset the PRAM a few times, and this doesn't fix the problem. I thought maybe the com.apple.audiomidisetup.plist file could be corrupted and deleted it, but that didn't help. I don't know what to try next to get the Macbook to start fresh when trying to use these devices, short of having to re-install OSX.
    Please, does anyone have a suggestion of how I can make the Macbook forget it ever saw these two USB DACs, and let me start fresh so they start working normally again? I do dozens of reviews for Head-fi.org and I can't afford to have my Macbook Pro compromised like this, which could prevent me from doing some reviews or evaluating new products.

    UPDATE:
    As noted in the first post, both of these newer USB DAC work fine at 24/96 on my wife's iMac, so it's clear that they didn't both become defective when I connected them to the Macbook Pro at the same time.
    Resetting the Macbook Pro PRAM didn't help, so I removed the hard shell laptop case to get to the battery and remove it, then reset the SMC. After that I could use the original DAC at 24/96 again, but only IF it was plugged into the rear USB port. If I plugged it into the front USB port then the sound was garbled and filled with noise. This was a vast improvement over no sound at all.
    Then I switched to the replacement/updated DAC, but I got no sound at all from either USB port at any bit-rate. And returning to the original DAC again now results in no sound again.
    Sigh... I will reset the PRAM and SMC again, and see how far I can get with this. I'd still love some help. Thanks!

  • HT4914 I have an iTunes library of some 18k tracks. If I subscribe to iTunes Match, can I delete my library from the pc hard drive and then download my entire collection back at the higher bit rate of 256?

    I would like to improve the quality of my iTunes library, most of which were ripped at the old 'higher quality' setting and not lossless.
    I would consider subscribing to the iTunes Match programme if I would later be able to download my music back on to my PC at the improved higher bit rate  stated.
    Is there a problem with this?

    In iPhoto, Select All the Photos you want to move... Then goto  > File > Export >
    Choose the settings as seen here
    Click Export and select your External Drive
    Best to create a Folder to put them in... and away you go...

  • HT204406 how do I download higher bit rate songs from itunes match to replace the lower bit rate I have on my itunes library?

    I have itunes match and I have about 500 songs that were ripped at 128kbps. I have been tolf that I can replace them via itunes match to improve them to 256 or 320?
    I have put them into a playlist in my itunes library and I want to know how I can upgrade their bit rate via itunes match. Can anyone help me?

    Sid,
    With the device connected, click the Summary tab and you will see the "Convert higher bit rate..." option.  Set it to 128.  See picture below:

  • How Can I Make Encore Create a Bluray Image that uses a Bit Rate that Really Fills The Disc?

    I have searched and browsed but have not seen this specific issue.
    I realize that if you leave the bit rate alone, Encore will use the best bitrate. In my experience, it doesnt. I have also found that the Disc Info on the Build tab is never correct. The final transcoded size of the ISO is always very different from what is shown.
    With the current disc I am making, I am encoding 4 HD m2t video files that total 20 GB on disk. The total running time is about 1hr 50m. Leaving everything set to defaults, the final size of the ISO file is 12 GB. I would like the final size to be around 20GB. I would expect that Encore would do this automatically. Changing bitrate in the project settings and re-transcoding does not change the final size. If I manually set the encoding, the size does change but since the Disc Info is unusable, it is excruciating trial and error. You have to pick settings that you think will work, wait hours for it to transcode, then it is way to big or way to small. I cant figure out how to get it to my target size.
    Also, when I transcode the files, Encore never lists the bit rates of the transcoded files. The field is always blank.
    It may also be note worthy that I have to first transcode the files, then build the disc. If I dont do that, the transcoding will hang. Even when I do separate the steps, sometimes when I build the disc from the transcoded files, the build of the disc still hangs.
    I am running a 3 GHz Quad CPU with 4 GB of Ram in 32 bit XP Pro. I have 5 physical drives of 500 GB each. I also use separate physical drives for the source files vs the target ISO. Disk space is not an issue.
    Also, is there any timeframe for when Adobe is going to release a new update? I have also run into other problems on this forum like the wonderful error 6 and the hanging transcoding, although my solutions to both problems were different than what was posted. It is all hit or miss.
    Does anyone know if Adobe going to add a feature like on other disc authoring programs where you click a Fit to disc button and it then calculates the best bit rate for the specified disc size? That would make me very happy.
    I would appreciate any help here.

    Encore does have a fit-to-disc feature, called "automatic transcoding", which chooses the bit rate based upon how much media there is to encode, how much room is currently on the disc, and applying format-legal restrictions (minimum and maximum bit rates allowable by the format).
    So for instance, 30 minutes of video will never fill a disc because the required bit rate to do so would be higher than allowable by the format.

  • Can no longer change bit rate in AAC custom import settings

    I've been re-ripping all my CDs at the new higher bit rate. My import settings were AAC Encoder -- custom, originally set to 256 kbps, VBR, and auto for the other two settings. However, some CDs I wanted at a lower setting, so I would go change the bit rate to either 192 or 224 (just so I'd have more room on my ipod) and there wouldn't be a problem. But now it's stuck -- the pop-up box no longer opens when I choose import settings, AAC Encoder, Custom, so I can't change the bit rate or anything else, and it's stuck on 224 kbps. I can still change bit rate and other settings in the custom menus for MP3, WAV, etc., just not AAC. A repair install of iTunes did not fix the problem.

    Hi, Ed. I am running iTunes 9.0.3.15. When I click custom, the settings description in the details box display what they were before this thing happened = 112 kbps (mono)/224 kbps (stereo), VBR, optimized for MMX/SSE2. The pop-up dialogue box that used to appear (where you could choose the specific bit rate from the drop down menu) does not appear at all.
    However, when I choose anything other than AAC Encoder, and then pick custom, the pop-up box appears and I can choose the bit rate and adjust the other settings as usual. It's just not happening for AAC Encoder anymore. Since the total un-install (following Apple's specified order) and reinstall didn't work, I'm baffled how to fix this .... (If it makes a difference, I changed the bit rate in the custom box while a CD was being burned...Apparently that was stupid, but I had done it previously without incident.) Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for